persistent identification

39

Upload: dh-benelux

Post on 09-May-2015

71 views

Category:

Presentations & Public Speaking


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Persistent identification: supporting digital humanities Alina Saenko

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Persistent identification
Page 2: Persistent identification

         

●  2005: a not-for-profit organisation founded by S.M.A.K., Argos, M HKA and MDD and focussed on the preservation of audiovisual arts  

●  2011: ‘Centre of Expertise in Digital Heritage’: development and dissemination of knowledge on and expertise in the digitisation of cultural heritage

●  Focus on all aspects of the digitisation process: creation, cataloguing, storage, sharing, exchange and reuse of digital heritage content

●  Flemish projects: CEST, Scoremodel Digital Sustainability, TRACKS, VIAA, opencultuurdata.be, Persistent Identification  

●  European projects: ATHENA, ATHENAplus, PREFORMA, Europeana Space, DCA, Linked Heritage

●  Erfgoedstats | SODA | SIP creator  ●  packed.be | scart.be | projectcest.be | scoremodel.org | projecttracks.org  

   

Page 3: Persistent identification

PERSISTENT IDENTIFICATION:

MAKING DIGITAL

HUMANITIES RESEARCH EASIER

Alina Saenko | PACKED vzw 13.06.2014

Page 4: Persistent identification

CONTENTS

§ The problem: How to lead digital humanities researchers to rich and trustworthy museum data?

§ The solution: Persistent identification of data as a technical requirement, making DH research possible

§ The project: Museum sector

4

Page 5: Persistent identification

THE PROBLEM

Page 6: Persistent identification

RESEARCHERS LOOK FOR -  trustworthy data from a source they can refer to, but…

6

Page 7: Persistent identification

RESEARCHERS LOOK FOR -  rich machine-readable data, which they can use for

digital analysis and research, but…

7

Page 8: Persistent identification

MUSEUMS STRUGGLE

-  how to keep online available data up-to-date? -  how to keep online available data complete/

comprehensive? -  how to publish the rich data in a machine-readable

format? -  how to get online available data as high as possible in

the ranking of search engines?

8

Page 9: Persistent identification

IS THERE A SOLUTION? Complex... But one important technical requirement: § Museums should gain control over the web address which points

to the information about a work of art in their collection.

§ Museum should aim for keeping this web address as persistent as possible in order to become a trustworthy source of information and to increase the internet traffic to the web address.

§ Museums should consider themselves as online publishers of their own collection data.

How does that work in practice?

9

Page 10: Persistent identification

THE SOLUTION:

PERSISTENT URIS

Page 11: Persistent identification

WHAT IS AN URI? 1.  make things and data accessible via the web

11

http://www.smak.be/collectie_kunstenaar.php?

la=en&id=&i=0&t=&tid=&y=&l=b&kunstenaar_id=1608&kunstwerk

_id=1490

http://www.smak.be/collectie_afbeeldingen/billing.jpg

Page 12: Persistent identification

WHAT IS AN URI? 2.  uniquely identify things on the web

12

Johanna Billing: ������

http://viaf.org/viaf/120189360

Page 13: Persistent identification

WHAT IS AN URI? 3.  link different things on the web to each other

13

Page 14: Persistent identification

14

Page 15: Persistent identification

PERSISTENT URI’S ENSURE:

§ stability and accessibility of published data over time

§ high ranking in search engines because they are human-readable and do not change

§ enrichment of data via external authorities because they are deliberately shared with others

15

Page 16: Persistent identification

16

Page 17: Persistent identification

17

Page 18: Persistent identification

HOW TO IMPLEMENT PERSISTENT URIS FOR WORKS OF ART?

- Use a good syntax

- Distinguish between work, data and representation

- Reuse existing persistent URIs

- Act as publisher

18

Page 19: Persistent identification

GOOD SYNTAX:

http:// [domain]/ mandatory

[type object]/ optional [type document]/ optional

[identification number] mandatory

Page 20: Persistent identification

GOOD SYNTAX:

http:// smak.be/collection/

work/ id/

A256

Page 21: Persistent identification

NOT A GOOD SYNTAX:

http://www.smak.be/collectie_kunstenaar.php?la=en&id=&i=0&t=&tid=&y=&l=b&kunstenaar_i

d=1608&kunstwerk_id=1490

Page 22: Persistent identification

Distinguish between art work, data and representation

22

Work In collection A

Data B

Data A

Data C …

Representation A

Page 23: Persistent identification

ART WORK:

http://���smak.be/collection/���

work/���id/���

A256

Page 24: Persistent identification

DATA: http://���smak.be/collection/���

work/���data/���A256

Page 25: Persistent identification

REPRESENTATION: http://���smak.be/collection/���

work/ representation/���

A256

Page 26: Persistent identification

WORK, DATA & REPRESENTATION

26

Work http://

smak.be/collection/work/

id/A256

Data B http://

museuminzicht.be/collection/

work/data/ A256

Data A http://

smak.be/collection/ work/data/

A256

Data C http://

museuminzicht.be/collection/

work/data/ A256

Representation A http://

smak.be/collection/work/representation/

A256

Page 27: Persistent identification

Reuse existing persistent URIs

Use external authorities for contextual data (institute, artist, date, object name), because: § stuff that is not managed by the museum, probably

already has an identifier somewhere else § they may contain contextual information that the museum

doesn’t have yet § often available as structured data in an open format § support of the Semantic Web idea

27

Page 28: Persistent identification

ARTIST – JOHANNA BILLING

RKDartists: ���http://explore.rkd.nl/explore/

artists/26958

Freebase: ���https://www.freebase.com/

m/0fn5hr

VIAF: ���http://viaf.org/viaf/

120189360

Page 29: Persistent identification

INSTITUTION - SMAK WIKIdata: ���

http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1540707

Page 30: Persistent identification

Act as publisher

§ Persistency can only be ensured by virtue of the publisher of the data. Therefore, museums should take up this responsibility in order to make digital humanities research based on their data possible.

30

Page 31: Persistent identification

THE PROJECT

Page 32: Persistent identification

PERSISTENT IDENTIFICATION PROJECT § 10 fine arts and contemporary art museums -> 10 data sets § Bottom-up approach § Deals with a lot of technical and practical questions § Works with data exports from our partners § Adds new persistent URIs next to existing data §  Identifies and links 7 entities in 10 data sets: art work, data,

representation, institute, date, artist, object name

32

Page 33: Persistent identification

OPEN REFINE

33

Page 34: Persistent identification

EXPECTED RESULTS

- show improved retrieval and enrichment in a demonstrator application

-  the new PIDs and the PIDs from external authorities integrated in the collection data

-  future websites with linked and enriched data (researches get more contextual information, than museums have)

34

Page 35: Persistent identification

35

Data

Representation

Data

Art work

Representation

Data

Page 36: Persistent identification

BENEFITS FOR MUSEUMS

§ makes registration and online publication of data easier! § scientific exposure § more control and user statistics about the online use of

collection data § improves accessibility of internal researches for external

audience

Concrete future plans: § VKC data hub: open data repositories § LUKAS representations hub: access to images of works of art

Page 37: Persistent identification

BENEFITS DIGITAL HUMANITIES

§ the data published by museums are high in ranking (easier to find for researchers)

§ behind the links there is trustworthy information

§ the data are rich in contextual info

§ museum as a switchboard between different data sources

Page 38: Persistent identification

THANK YOU! [email protected]

Page 39: Persistent identification