perkins eastman architecture consulting interior design · perkins eastman architecture consulting...

Perkins Eastman ARCHITECTURE

CONSULTING

INTERIOR DESIGN

PLANNING

PROGRAMMING

March 4, 2014

Hon. Meenakshi Srinivasan

Chair S 0

New York City Board of Standards and Appeals

250 Broadway, 29th Floor

New York, NY 10007

; 7 Re: New York Methodist Hospital

Center for Community Health

505-525 6th Street (Block 1084,

Lots 25, 26, 28, 39-44, 46, 48,

L ' " 50-59, 164, 1001, and 1002)

BSA Cal.No. 289-13-BZ

Dear Chair Srinivasan and Commissioners:

We are submitting this letter in connection with the application by New

York Methodist Hospital ("NYM" or the "Hospital") for a variance to facilitate the

development of a new ambulatory care facility (the "Center") Hospital's main campus in

Brooklyn. This letter and the attached materials provide responses to questions asked by

the Board at the February 11, 2014, public hearing on the application, as set forth below.

1. Provide studies for lesser variance options for the Center that (i) fully comply with

the applicable height and setback regulations in the R7B district and (ii) reduce the

degree of the building's non-compliance with the applicable height and setback

regulations in the R6B district.

Attached to this letter is a Lesser Variance Study prepared by Perkins

Eastman Architects, consisting of illustrative diagrams for alternate designs of the Center

that would require a lesser variance. The Study is a preliminary analysis of how the Hospital's

needed program would be accommodated in such alternate versions of the building. While

further analysis would be needed to finalize the program of such a building, the attached

illustrative diagrams are representative of the nature and degree of program impacts that would

result.

The Lesser Variance Study examines three modifications to the

proposed Center's building envelope: (i) an increased setback at the 4th floor in the R6B

district; (ii) an increased setback at the 5,h through 7th floors in the R6B district; and (iii) an

increased setback at the 6th floor in the R7B district to achieve full compliance with the

R7B height and setback regulations. The portions of the building, as currently proposed,

that would be eliminated by such modifications are shown on the Lesser Variance

Reductions diagrams attached to this letter.

The first lesser variance option would increase the building's setback

from 5th Street in the R6B district by an additional 15 feet, to a total depth of 20 feet from

the street. In the current design for the Center, the western wing of the building contains a

surgical suite with 12 operating rooms (ORs) on the 3rd floor, a post-anesthesia care unit

NORTH AMERICA

ARLINGTON, VA

BOSTON MA

CHARLOTTE, NC

CHICAGO, IL

NEW YORK, NY

OAKLAND. CA

PITTSBURGH, PA

STAMFORD, CI

TORONTO, ON

SOUTH AMERICA

GUAYAQUIL, ECU

ASIA

MUMBAI, IND

SHANGHAI, PRC

MIDDLE EAST

DUBAI, UAE

PERKINS EASTMAN ARCHITECTS, PC

115 FIFTH AVENUE

NEW YORK, NY 10003

T. 212.353.7200

F. 212.353.7676

WWW.PERKINSEASTMAN.COM

ARCHITECTURE

CONSULTING

INTERIOR DESIGN

PLANNING

PROGRAMMING

• The relocation of CSS and Materials Management to a floor with smaller

dimensions requires a reduction of the program area for one or both of these

functions, with impacts on the efficiency of the building's operations. (See Lesser

Variance Study, 4th Floor Plan Diagram)

• To accommodate the surgical suite, the current design for the Center has a stiffer

floor construction at the 3rd floor to reduce vibration and deflection. This stiffer

construction is achieved by utilizing standard-depth beams over shorter spans,

requiring a denser column spacing on the floor immediately below. The more

tightly-spaced columns do not significantly impede the configuration of CSS and

Materials Management, but they would result in compromised or displaced PACU

units if the PACU suite is relocated to the 2nd floor. (See Lesser Variance Study, 2nd

Floor Plan Diagram)

• As an alternative to maintaining standard-depth beams and denser column

spacing on the 2nd floor, the building could be designed with a deeper 3rd floor

construction to achieve the floor stiffness required for the surgical suite. This would

take the form of deeper structural framing members, spanning between fewer,

farther-spaced columns than in the above option, to provide the stiffness required

for the surgical floor. This solution results in either a greater floor-to-floor height

for the floor and, in turn, the building, or a reduced headroom condition on the 2nd

floor, with its associated loss of flexibility, compromised design, and complex

coordination, maintenance, and construction, as described below.

» The location of CSS on the 4th floor with an increased setback from 5th Street would

require that the building's soiled elevator and flanking support spaces be moved

southward to remain within the building envelope. (See Lesser Variance Study, 4th

Floor Plan Diagram) In order to accommodate the relocation of the elevator shaft

and support spaces on the 3rd floor while maintaining sterile connections, the

building's surgical suite must be reduced in size. This would require the

displacement of support space or a reduction in the size of one or more ORs, with

a resulting reduction in services to the community. (See Lesser Variance Study, 3rd

Floor Plan Diagram)

• CSS and Materials Management both rely heavily on the western wing's service

elevators. Moving these facilities two floors up in the building would increase

demand on the service elevators, with impacts on other users of the elevators, and

Perkins Eastman

(PACU) on the 4th floor, and Central Sterile Services (CSS) and Materials Management on

the 2nd floor. As discussed in the application, the vertical adjacencies between these

facilities are needed to create a controlled, sterile environment for the building's surgical

functions and efficient travel distances for patients and staff. The PACU suite contains 36

patient rooms in order to maintain a 3-to-1 ratio to the building's ORs, as required by New

York State Department of Health code. The amount of space for PACU cannot be

reduced in size without requiring a reduction in the number of PACU rooms and, in turn, a

reduction in the number of ORs on the 3rd floor. The Study therefore accomplishes the

additional setback at the 4th floor by swapping the PACU suite with CSS and Materials

Management on the 2nd floor. While this design modification maintains the needed vertical

adjacencies and allows an increased setback at the 4th floor, it creates a number of issues,

including possible impacts on the size of ORs, as follows:

ARCHITECTURE

CONSULTING

INTERIOR DESIGN

PLANNING

PROGRAMMING

The Lesser Variance Study also examines the impacts of providing more

significant setbacks along 5th Street to achieve full compliance with the height and setback

regulations in the R7B district and to reduce the height of the portion of the building in the R6B

district to four stories. In particular, the eastern wing's 6th floor is set back by approximately an

additional 20 feet to the R6 district boundary line, and the western wing's 5th through 7th floors are

set back approximately by an additional 69 feet to the R6 district boundary line. As

demonstrated by the diagrams, the design of the Center cannot be modified as suggested

without significantly reducing the size of or completely eliminating certain departments or

services and compromising the building's flexibility, efficiency, and ability to provide

innovative care programs. In particular:

• Many of the ambulatory surgery and clinical institute facilities would be severely

reduced in size, resulting in a building that leaves the Hospital's programmatic

need for additional space largely unsatisfied. In the Lesser Variance Study, the

Orthopedics Institute is reduced by 1,053 departmental gross square feet (dgsf), or

16%; the Cardiology Institute is reduced by 2,958 dgsf, or 25%; the Cancer Care

Institute is reduced by 11,463 dgsf, or 38%; and the Women's Center is reduced

by 2,343 dgsf, or 15%. The total reduction in clinical program (including the loss

of the hyperbaric chamber facilities, described below) is 22,622 dgsf, which is

more than 1 8% of the 123,208 dgsf accommodated by the current design for the

Center.

• Support facilities that are critical to the operation of the surgical suite would also be

compromised. In the Lesser Variance Study, CSS is reduced by 196 dgsf, or 6%,

and Materials Management is reduced by 538 dgsf, or 28%.

• Certain facilities would be eliminated entirely. In the Lesser Variance Study, the

building would not be able to house any hyperbaric chamber facilities.

• Many healthcare program areas would be relocated or reconfigured, with the

resulting elimination of efficient adjacencies. In the Lesser Variance Study, the

Women's Center on the 7th Floor can be accommodated only by splitting the

department into two spaces, one on each side of the building's circulation core,

resulting in a bifurcation of services, increased travel times, and less efficient

circulation paths for patients and staff. Rapid Response Lab and USP 797

Pharmacy are relocated from the 6lh floor to the 4th floor, two floors away from the

6th floor Institute for Cancer Care that such facilities predominately serve. Further,

mechanical and electrical equipment spaces currently located in the setback areas

would be displaced, requiring a reconfiguration of program areas to

accommodate them in new locations.

In short, a building with the suggested setbacks would be inadequate to satisfy

the Hospital's programmatic needs.

Perkins Eastman

require additional travel times for each delivery made to these spaces. (See Lesser

Variance Study, 4th Floor Plan Diagram)

2. Provide diagrams illustrating the programmatic issues associated with construction a

larger portion of the Center, e.g. up to five stories, over the existing Hospital garage.

Perkins Eastman

The attached Garage Overbuild Study demonstrates the programmatic

deficiencies of a development that includes construction over the existing Hospital garage. The

proposed design configuration of the Center on the U-shaped development site is based on a

design principle by which two distinct circulation paths are provided (i) for patients and (ii) for staff,

oriented around a centrally located core, with patients led progressively toward more controlled,

private, and dedicated spaces—from the waiting area to registration, then to processing, then to

preparation, and finally to treatment in the eastern and western wings of the building. This design

not only provides a rational, efficient circulation network, but it is also needed to accommodate

certain ambulatory care facilities in the building. The surgical suite, for example, must be located

in the Center's western wing because the central core area and eastern wing do not have sufficient

dimensions to accommodate the facilities. The PACU unit and CSS, which must be adjacent to the

surgical suite, are therefore also located in the western wing, on the floors immediately above and

below.

An additional wing located over the existing Hospital garage, with a height of

five stories (or more or less), would not satisfy the Center's programmatic needs because the

geometry would necessitate that it be functionally and operationally segregated from the

remaining portion of the building. Connections could not be made between the garage wing and

the main building because (i) the vehicular driveway and loading area would separate the garage

wing and the rest of the building on the ground floor (see Ground Floor Plan Diagram) and (ii)

security, infection-control, and operational standards for the ambulatory surgery facilities would

prohibit pass-through access to the garage wing on the 2nd through 4th floors, which house CSS,

PACU, and the ORs (see 2nd Floor Plan through 4th Floor Plan Diagrams). A connection would be

possible only at the 5th floor, and even then would create a very long, inefficient circulation

network between the main portion of the new facility and the garage wing of the building—a

circulation network which would run through departments rather than distribute to them

efficiently from a central core. In addition, the program areas within the garage wing and western

wing on the 5th floor would have no functional relationship to each other, and therefore any

connection between them would be detrimental to such programs and introduce security,

infection, and efficiency concerns. (See 5th Floor Plan Diagram)

Such a design would also require an additional vehicular drop-off and

pedestrian entrance on 5th Street, since almost all of the garage wing's floors, including the ground

floor, could not be accessed from the building's central circulation core on 6th Street. This

configuration would require an inefficient utilization of space, with more area dedicated to vertical

and horizontal circulation and vehicular access, and would result in increased vehicular traffic on

5th Street. (See Ground Floor Plan Diagram) In short, the building would have the same

deficiencies as the Complying Development. To the extent that the garage wing complied with

applicable height and setback and rear yard equivalent regulations, it would similarly contain very

narrow floor plates, capable of accommodating only inefficiently small suites for the Hospital's

clinical institutes.

3. Explain why the proposed floor-to-floor heights of the Center, particularly those for the 6th

and 7th floors, are needed.

The floor-to-floor height of most of the proposed Center's floors is 14'-0",

which is appropriate for accommodating the medical facilities and equipment that the

Center may need now or in the future. The consistency of this height among the building's

floors provides appropriate flexibility for the reprogramming of the building.

Perkins Eastman Architects studied an alternate design for the Center in

which the 5th through 7th floors are each reduced in floor-to-floor height by 6 inches to

reduce the total building height by 1'-6". As shown by the attached elevation comparison

ARCHITECTURE

CONSULTING

• NTERlOR DESIGN

PLANNING

PROG R AAA M i N G

Perkins Eastman

and massing comparison, these modifications result in a negligible reduction in the

building's apparent height, while reducing the building's planning flexibility. They also

compromise the efficiency of the building in a number of ways:

• The design, coordination, and maintenance of the building's utilities would

become more complex. The height reduction would require a greater compaction

of overhead utilities and equipment, with various systems lines and equipment

needing to be either split to reduce overall depth or ganged, thereby limiting

access to those lines and the equipment located behind them.

ARCHITECTURE

CONSULTING

iNTERIOR DESIGN

PLANNING

PROGRAMMING

• Similarly, the height reduction would limit routing options for major ductwork and

pipes, requiring a finer level of coordination and fabrication by contractors—with

more conflicts in the field and costly and time-consuming field fixes.

• The height reduction would in some cases require the flattening of ductwork,

resulting in suboptimal height-to-width ratios. Such ratios would result in increased

surface friction, requiring either larger fans or increased demands on fans, with the

associated wear and tear. They would also result in increased face velocities for air

passage in some cases, and in turn reduced patient comfort.

• Design responses to the above problems, where possible, would in many cases

require beam cuts and the utilization of shallower, heavier beams, with significant

added costs.

In light of the significant benefits to be gained by the proposed floor-to-

floor ceiling heights, and the negligible benefit and new issues that would be created by

decreasing such heights, we believe that the proposed design is highly appropriate.

4. Discuss whether the proposed rooftop mechanical enclosures can be set back

farther from 5th Street.

As shown in the attached Equipment Screen Study, consisting of an 8th

Floor Plan Diagram, 9th Floor Plan Diagram, and Section Diagrams, the rooftop

mechanical closures for the proposed Center have been designed to provide the minimum

required clearance around the rooftop equipment currently planned for the building. They

cannot be set back farther from the street for this reason. As the design of the building

advances, we will explore options for the mechanical equipment that may require smaller

enclosures.

We would be pleased to provide the Board with any additional information you

need. Thank you for your consideration.

Very truly yours,

Francis Gunther, AIA

Principal

•3 THROUGH LOT B: R6 R6B

ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY

BLOCK C.L.

THROUGH LOT

SKY EXPOSURE PLANE 2.7/1

(NARROW STREET)

149' 5.8" HT.

5TH

STREET

CORNER LOTS C & D: R6 R7B ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY

BLOCK C.L

CORNER LOT R&

/

SKY EXPOSURE PLANE 2.7/1 /

(NARROW STREET)

272.1'j, /

140' 3.6" HTT^

MAX. HEIGHT OF FRONT WALL

60' OR 6 STORIES,

WHICHEVER IS LESS

(R6)

R7B CORNER LOT

.MAX75' j

k MAX 60'

6TH

STREET 5TH

STREE

JJ Ik

Tl fF

AREAS OF NON-COMPLIANCE

SKY EXPOSURE PLANE

PERMITTED BUILDING ENVELOPE LESSER VARIANCE REDUCTIONS

NEW YORK METHODIST HOSPITAL CENTER FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH MARCH 4, 2014 ILLUSTRIATIVE. FOR INFORMATION ONLY

LESSER VARIANCE REDUCTIONS l?nt, + inn»

5TH STREET 95-10"

6TH STREET IMPACTED PROGRAMATIC SPACE o

<

CO

LESSER VARIANCE REDUCTIONS


LESSER VARIANCE REDUCTIONS ><-ri i n ri—rn KR^IS Ik i r»/n T^Avl/lllQ T? O L'f lllOll

DISPLACED MECHANICAL SPACE MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE FROM

RELOCATED ABOVE WILL RELOCATED TO THIS FLOOR

12-6"

5TH STREET

LU

LU

<

oo

'CATED MECHANICAL

IMPACTED PROGRAMATIC SPACE | | LESSER VARIANCE REDUCTIONS

NEW YORK METHODIST HOSPITAL CENTER FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH

LESSER VARIANCE REDUCTIONS r~r\ i ri n—rn K S-<\S i k i n / i

MARCH 4, 2014 ILLUSTRIATIVE. FOR INFORMATION ONLY

Dnvl/ino 17 4i L'f moil

DISPLACED MECHANICAL SPACE

RELOCATED 5TH STREET

GATED MECHANICAL

LESSER VARIANCE REDUCTIONS


LESSER VARIANCE REDUCTIONS /TI i I~I ri—rr> A ik i n / n A k ir\ A ~I r» T}/\l#l.r 1 11 L2 TP *1 L.'"t"lll *111

GREEN ROOF

ULTRA

SOUND

CLEAN

SUPPORT BONE

DENSITY

WAITING

(40 SEATS) CONSUL

RELOCATED MECHANICAL

LESSER VARIANCE REDUCTIONS IMPACTED PROGRAMATIC SPACE

DISPLACED MECHANICAL SPACE

RELOCATED 5TH STREET

1


LESSER VARIANCE REDUCTIONS -7Ti i r~1 ri—rn A \s ik i n / r» Dnvl/iiio TTocfmon

No Plan Changes 6TH STREET Illustrative - For Information onl>

LESSER VARIANCE STUDY

inym NEW YORK/METHODIST HOSPITAL

Perkins Eastman

BSA

The Center for Community Health NY Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn

Ground Floor Plan N

03-04-2014 Scale: 1" = 32-0" rT

OFFICE LOADING

DOCK

5 TORAGIi

HOT

ROOM TRABH CHUTE

BALER

PHARMACY/SUPPORT STAGING

AREA EQ

STORAGE BLDG

UPPORI HLEBOTOMY STAIR A

PHARMACY

V /SUPPORT STAIR C

WOMENS

PEDESTRIAN

-ENTRANCE

5TH STREET

LU

LU

oo

No Plan Changes 6TH STREET Illustrative - For Information only


nym JEW YORK/METHODIST HOSPfW

BSA

The Center for Community Health Perkins Eastman

NY Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn

First Floor Plan N

03-04-2014 Scale: 1" = 32'-0" rr

STAIR D

OFFICE LOADING

DOCK

I TORAGI i

HOT

ROOM TRASH CHUTE

BALER

FIRE

)MMAN ) STAGING

AREA

STAIR B

Compromised / Displaced PACU due to denser column grid for Surgical Suite above

5TH STREET

LU

Sc

CO

PACU and Special Procedures relocated from Fourth Floor

Illustrative - For Information only


nym NEW YORK^METHODIST HOSPITAL

BSA The Center for Community Health

Perkins Eastman


Second Floor Plan N

03-04-2014 Scale: 1" = 32'-0" ft

Surgery and support spaces impacted due to required shifting to the south of soiled elevator and support spaces 5TH STREET

ENT

a ll E

ix

5

rvJ

jtrer

3 h°

id

(r

h0

a V

(r

h0

W

y^i

JC ..J UROLOGY

LU

LU

<

oo

nym JEW YORK/METHODIST HOSPIT/>

Perkins Eastman

The Center for Community Health



BSA NY Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn

Third Floor Plan N

03-04-2013 Scale: 1" = 32'-0"

5TH STREET

6% Reduction (196dgsf) -Location of soiled elevator to be coordinated w/ Surgery Support

3,789dgsf

m

28% Reduction (538dgsf)

USP 797 PHARMACY No direct adjacency to Cancer Center

MATERIALS MANAGEMENT

2,541 dgsf / EMER6

ELEC

i \ STAIR A ~y\

EMERG

ELEC

V STAIR C ^ r-—

I2WKST)

16% Reduction (1,053dgsf)

No direct adjacency to Cancer center Illustrative - For Information only



The Center for Community Health Fourth Floor Plan

03-04-2014 Scale: 1" = 32-0"

5TH STREET

Displaced Mechanical Unit from 7th Floor roof


UROSCIENC D47dgsif

l [ 3 £ ^

.3 £ ^

LU | I

j

No Plan changes



nyim NEW YORK/METHODIST HOSPITAL

BSA The Center for Community Health

Perkins Eastman


Fifth Floor Plan N

03-04-2014 Scale: 1" = 32,-0" (X

5TH STREET

Displaced Mechanical and Electrical


LLI

LU

|

i— oo

Displaced Mechanical _ and Electrical



BSA The Center for Community Health NY Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn

Sixth Floor Plan N

03-04-2014 Scale: 1" = 32'-0"

5TH STREET



-Department split across circulation core creating less efficiency


LU

<

oo

Illustrative - For Information onl;


nym JEW YORK/METHODIST HOSPIT/I

BSA



Seventh Floor Plan N

03-04-2014 Scale: 1" = 32-0" £T

5TH STREET

/•

LU

CO



nyim JEW YORK/METHODIST HOSPIT/

BSA



Rad0nc(B1) Floor Plan N

03-04-2014 Scale: 1" = 32'-0" ££

MAIN

ELECTRICAL ROOM

EMERGENCY

ELECTRICAL ROOM

RAMP DOWN

DOWN TO

P2 FLOOR IT SUPPORT/ IT TRAINING/

SECURITY Relocated from

Fourth Floor

STAIR B

y/z/jd///,

HEMATOLOGICAL D^JCOLO :Y J

HEMATOLC (jlCAL ONCOLOGY

CARDIOLOGY NEUROSCIENCES

CSS/SU (3 LOCKERS/USP 797 PHAI MACY/F |R LAB/FROZEN SE; CTIONS LAB/ MAT M^IGMT t

ORTHOPElj :s CENTRAL STERILE SUPPLY - 3,789dgsf

6% reduction (196dgsf)

MATERIALS MANAGEMENT - 2,541 dgsf


CENTRAL STERILE SUPPLY - 3,789dgsf



28% reduction (538dgsf) SURGERY/I REP

Off

ENT/UROLC |GY

CENTRAL STERILE SUPPLY - 3,789dgsf




3ACU /REC3 VERY

DROPOFF

1

LOBBY

^ ik

PHLEBOTOMY /PH/RMACY

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES BIO MEC T / IT TRAINING / SECURIT r

SPECIAL PROCEDURES

RADIATION

IMAGING I URGENT CARE I PRE ADMIT

ONCOLOGY

DEPARTMENTS REMOVED:

HYPERBARIC CHAMBER -4,805dgsf

DEPARTMENT REDUCTIONS:

ORTHOPEDICS CLINIC-16,919dgsf

16% reduction (1,053dgsf)

CARDIOLOGY CLINIC - 9,323dgsf


CANCER CENTER-19,392


WOMEN'S CENTER - 13,693dgsdf


TOTAL DEPARTMENTAL GROSS SF REDUCTION:

-23,356dgsf

nym NEW YORK/METHODIST HOSPITAL

Perkins Eastman


Illustrative - For Information onl}


BSA

NY Methodist Hospital

03-04-2014 Scale: 1" = 32'-0"

J I, J 1, J t, J \ J 1,

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS & VEHICULAR

DROP-OFF 5TH STREET

LU

UJ

J

VEHICULAR/ PEDESTRIAN

ACCESS

OPEN

SECURE

CONTROLLED 6TH STREET

LU

2 LU

PRIMARY / PATIENT

CIRCULATION <• STAFF AREAS /

CIRCULATION

O WAITING / ORIENTATION

o PROCESSING / PREP

O TREATMENT/ CONSULTATION

BUILDING SYSTEMS

SUPPORT

Garage Overbuild Study

nynn NEW YORK/METHODIST HOSPIW

Perkins Eastmai

The Center for Community Health L 03-04-2014

BSA SIY Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn

3round Floor Plan ^

n

< n=

/\

J i, J ̂ J i, J i, J ̂

PUBLIC

OPEN

SECURE


169'

« s

« 1 «

•« tJ 111

NO FUNCTIONAL CONNECTION -PATIENTS & MEDICAL STAFF

CANNOT PASS BETWEEN WINGS

DUPLICATE ACCESS / CIRCULATION / CONTROL AREAS

DUPLICATE / SPLIT BUILDING SYSTEMS

SECURE

CONTROLLED

PUBLIC OPEN

6TH STREET

SECURE

CONTROLLED

UJ z> •Z. LU

Sc X

/\

1 L 1

M o 4 ' "

O O o o

PRIMARY/PATIENT

CIRCULATION

STAFF AREAS /

CIRCULATION

WAITING /ORIENTATION

PROCESSING/PREP

TREATMENT/

CONSULTATION

BUILDING SYSTEMS

SUPPORT

Garage Overbuild Study ILLUSTRATIVE. FOR INFORMATION ONLY


Perkins Eastman

The Center for Community Health 03-04-2014

BSA MY Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn

Second Floor Plan ^

3 1 T

J I, J I, J >1 J 1, J"

PUBLIC

OPEN

SECURE

CONTROLLED

->

5TH STREET

DUPLICATE / SPLIT BUILDING" SYSTEMS- SECURE

CONTROLLED

PUBLIC ^ OPEN 1

6TH STREET

SECURE

CONTROLLED

LLI ZD Z LLI

3; X I— CO

j u y

P. O

o o o o

PRIMARY / PATIENT

CIRCULATION

STAFF AREAS /

CIRCULATION

WAITING / ORIENTATION

PROCESSING /PREP

TREATMENT/

CONSULTATION

BUILDING SYSTEMS

SUPPORT

Garage Overbuild Study

' N 1 1

N

I

nyim EW YORK/METHODIST HOSPITAL

^erkins Eastman

The Center for Community Health 03-04-2014

BSA MY Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn

Fhird Floor Plan ,Jjk

U7

PUBLIC

OPEN

SECURE


NO FUNCTIONAL CONNECTION -PATIENTS & MEDICAL STAFF

CANNOT PASS BETWEEN WINGS

SECURITY, INFECTION CONTROL & EFFICIENCY RESTRICTIONS

DUPLICATE ACCESS/ CIRCULATION / CONTROL AREAS

DUPLICATE / SPLIT BUILDING" SYSTEMS- SECURE

CONTROLLED

PUBLIC OPEN

6TH STREET

SECURE

CONTROLLED

UJ

n:

9. o o o o o

PRIMARY / PATIENT

CIRCULATION

STAFF AREAS /

CIRCULATION

WAITING/ORIENTATION

PROCESSING/PREP

TREATMENT/

CONSULTATION

BUILDING SYSTEMS

SUPPORT



Perkins Eastman

The Center for Community Health BSA NY Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn

Fourth Floor Plan 03-04-2014

I 1, J I I I \

UJ

A

PUBLIC

OPEN

SECURE


CIRCULATION THROUGH WINGS WOULD INTRODUCE SECURITY & EFFICIENCY ISSUES & DISPLACE

PROGRAM AREA

INEFFICIENT CIRCULATION NETWORK

DUPLICATE ACCESS/ CIRCULATION / CONTROL AREAS

SECURE

CONTROLLED

PUBLIC OPEN

6TH STREET

SECURE

CONTROLLED

J

II

LU ZD

LLl

X

P-O

o o o o

PRIMARY / PATIENT

CIRCULATION

STAFF AREAS /

CIRCULATION

WAITING/ORIENTATION

PROCESSING / PREP

TREATMENT/

CONSULTATION

BUILDING SYSTEMS

SUPPORT

•


nym NEW YORI^F METHODIST HOSPITAL



Fifth Floor Plan N

03-04-2014

MASSING AS PER 01 -28-2014 SUBMITTAL

MASSING WITH 5TH-7TH FLOOR HEIGHT REDUCTION

NEW YORK METHODIST HOSPITAL CENTER FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH

MASSING COMPARISON NORTH ELEVATION

MARCH 4, 2014 ILLUSTRATIVE. FOR INFORMATION ONLY

T71 » [. + 11M111

MASSING AS PER 01 -28-2014 SUBMITTAL MASSING WITH 5TH-7TH FLOOR HEIGHT REDUCTION

NEW YORK METHODIST HOSPITAL CENTER FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH MARCH 4, 2014 ILLUSTRATIVE. FOR INFORMATION ONLY

MASSING COMPARISON VIEW FROM 5TH ST AND 8TH AVE.

5TH STREET

6TH STREET • Enclosed mechanical area

! I Screened mechanical area

LLl ZD

LU

<

CO

ILLUSTRATIVE. FOR INFORMATION ONI

Equipment Screen

Study

nynn NEW VORI^fMfFHOniST HOSPITAl

Perkins Eastman


8th Floor Plan n

2014-03-04

) (b)©<5)

LU

LLI > <

oo

6TH STREET Enclosed mechanical area

! Screened mechanical area

ILLUSTRATIVE. FOR INFORMATION ONI

Equipment Screen

Study

nym NEW YORK/Mf-THOtJlST HOSPITAl

Perkins Eastman


9th Floor Plan n

2014-03-04


BLOCK C.L

SKY EXPOSURE PLANE 2.7 M

(NARROW STREET)

272.1'

COOLING TOWER

W/REQUIRED FREE

AREA AROUND

86.13'.is. 40' 3.72HT. T

1 -Section at Cooling Tower


BLOCK CL

SKY EXPOSURE PLANE2.71

(MARROW STREET)

272.1' ^ 145' 7.9' HT. T

EMERGENCY

GENERATORS TIGHT

TO SCREEN (w/FLUE

EXTENSION ABOVE)

86.13' J,

2 - Section at Emergency Generator

P.L.

ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY BLOCK C.L. P.L.

-20'

REQ'D

SETBACK

't it I

CORNER LOT

/

R6-

/

*

£

a

I n- ~J*Z-

8 MECHANICAL frlCLOS f-*

-RE

? INSTITUTES (AFFILIATED PHYSICIA^IOFFICES

3 M3T1TITESIAFHWTH) PHYSICIAN OFFICES

-R7B CORNER LOT

AIR HANDLING UNIT

w/DUCTWORK ABOVE &

ACCESS AISLES.

"(AHU BEYOND SHOWN

DASHED)

"-2V

LO CNJ

T

3-

15'^

REQ'D

BETBACC

5 HEMATCU3GCAL OUC&OGY —~~ r ">

iPAOl,'RECOVERY ]

3 SURGERY•PRE? CO

*

2 CSSSURGEAL LOCKERS "*T v=

1 MAGtNG \ URGENT CARE t PRE ADMIT LO

C RADlATlOM OrtCOLOGV s;

Ovl CM

3=lp

S01 PARKHG

SC 2 PARKING CO ^— M

3 - Section at Air Handling Unit

- y OUT LOTS ' ••

49fl£

&

Nfw yoh*/mfrwontSThospiai

Perkins Eastman


Equipment Screer

Study


2014-03-04 0

perkins eastman architecture consulting interior design · perkins eastman architecture consulting...

Documents