performances of frozen-spin polarized hd targets for ...pd: 2 k, 2 t df: 12 mk, 15 t ibc: 0.3 k, 1...
TRANSCRIPT
@ PST05, Nov.14-17, 2005
T. Kageya1,2
on behalf of LEGS Spin Collaboration
1. Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY, USA2. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA
*
* Supported by a research grant from the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. National Science Foundation
Performances of frozen-spin polarized HD targets for Nucleon spin experiments.
MotivationMotivation
Nucleon Spin Sum Rules
Gerasimov−Drell−Hearn
Nucleon spin strucure at Q2=0
LEGS covers ~65%Measurement down to pion threshold is important
Forward Spin−Polarizability
Test of chiral perturbation theories
LEGS covers ~90%Measurement down to pion threshold is important
γ dE3γE
3/2σ - 1/2σ∞
πm∫2π4
1 =0γ
γ dEγE
3/2σ - 1/2σ∞
πm∫2π4
1 =2κ22mα-
Multipole Amplitudes
Double polarization observablesAsymmetries E and GNeutron channels πon and π−p
Attractive Features Polarized HD Target
1. Pure Solid Targets
* Only unpolarizable nucleons associatedwith target cell which can be measured separately and subtracted in coventional way
2. Long Spin-Relaxation time
~ 1 year in beam
3. H D : Higher D polarization
4. H D
Can Select H D
H D
Polarize H in HD using polarized ortho -H 2
H 2
Ortho -> Para
Para
Polarize H at 12mK, 15 T
Spinexchange
Polarized H in HDH 2
Ortho
Para
HD : L = 0
L =1
L = 0
No spin exchange to HD (Frozen Spin)
H H
H H
HHH
HH
H H H H
DD
DD
12 mK, 15 T Age: ~ 3 months
(Half in 4.5 days)
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Eq
uil
ibri
um
Po
lari
za
tio
n [
%]
T [mK]
HD at 15 Tesla
H vectorD vectorD tensor
Expected Polarizations
12 milli−Kelvin and 15 Tesla
HD target Produced, Calibrated,
Polarized and On the beam
Down to 10 - 4 of H2 in HD
PD: 2 K, 2 T
DF: 12 mK, 15 T
IBC: 0.3 K, 1 T
: TC: 2 K, 0.12 T
Polarized and Aged
Distillation
(1) HD ice productionTE calibration
(2) Polarization Measure.
(3) Polarization Measure.
On BeamMonitor PolarizationT1 Measurements
Cross-Coil NMR for Measuring Target Polarization
H D
Typical NMR Scans for the SPHICE Target at TE
Hydrogen Deuterium
����������� �� � ��� �������
� ������ !"#$%&%&'(
) *,+ -/.0)21
-3+ -
*3+ -�.3)41
5 + -�.3)4*
5 + *�.3)4*
6 + -�.3)4*
6 + *�.3)4*
����������� �� � ��� �������
�7����� !"#$%&%&'(
) 5 + */.0)2*
) 5 + -/.0)2*
) *,+ -/.0)21
-3+ -
*3+ -�.3)41
5 + -�.3)4*
5 + *�.3)4*
����������� �� � ��� �������
� ������ !"#$%&%&'(
) */+ -,.8)41
-3+ -
*3+ -�.3)41
5 + -�.3)4*
5 + *�.3)4*
6 + -�.3)4*
6 + *�.3)4*
����������� �� � ��� �������
�7����� !"#$%&%&'(
) 5 + *,.8)4*
) 5 + -,.8)4*
) */+ -,.8)41
-3+ -
*3+ -�.3)41
5 + -�.3)4*
5 + *�.3)4*
UpDown
UpDown
NMR Signal =
9,:<;=; 9?>�; ; >�; :<;�;
9,:<;=; 9?>�; ; >�; :<;�;
9,:<;=; 9?>�; ; >�; :<;�;
9,:<;=; 9?>�; ; >�; :<;�;
Summary of HD target polarizations during recent runs at LEGS
Fall 2004 17 days + 7 % + 53 %, - 26 %
Year Duration P(D) P(H)
Spring 2005 32 days + 31 % + 30 %, -7 %
0 100 200 300 400 500Time +hrs/
�0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8noitaziralo
PTarget #3 Polarization during November 2004 Run
T1#D' 238 day
T1#H' 241 day
T1#D' 292 day
T1#H' 883 day
p in PD
p in QIBC
d in PD
d in QIBC
Summary and Rationalization of Fall and Spring Data v1.nb 1
Spin transition: H HAllowed fast passage RF transition
mD = - 1mD = 0
mD = + 1
ab
c
mH = -1/2
mH = +1/2d
e
f
!
�
"#
���� � ��� � �� �� � � � � � � � ��� �� � ��!
$!
�� �� � � � �
!
�
"#
�� � � � � � �� �� � � � � � � � �� � � � ��!
$%
� � �� � � � �
$,"#
$&��� ��
�Fall'04: P(H) = 53%,P(D) = 7%
Spin transition: H D Saturated Forbidden RF Transition
mD = - 1mD = 0
mD = + 1
ab
c
mH = -1/2
mH = +1/2d
e
f
Nd > Nb, Ne > Nc Nd = Nb, Ne = Nc
0 200 400 600 800Time +hrs/
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8noitaziralo
P
Target #4 Polarization during April 2005 Run
T1#D' 345 day
T1#H' 187 day
T1#H' 243 day
7�Occcccccc2
Occcc2
H in PD
H in QIBC
D in PD
D in QIBC
Summary and Rationalization of Fall and Spring Data v1.nb 1
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
-200-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200
helicity 1/2! + D
empty cell
full cell
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
-200-150-100 -50 0 50 100 150 200
helicity 3/2! + D
empty cell
full cell
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
-200-150-100 -50 0 50 100 150 200
E"#
Missing Energy (MeV)
helicity 1/2! + D
LEGS production run #2, deepUV-1 (Spring'05)
D(!,"#n) P
! = 92% P
D = 31%
E! = 341 MeV $cm
("#n) = 105
o
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
-200-150-100 -50 0 50 100 150 200
E"#
Missing Energy (MeV)
helicity 3/2! + D
- target cell and Al wirescontain the only unpolarizable nucleons;
- background is sampled in runs with an empty cell
D(g,pi0n)341MeV105 full&empty_FS
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Ea
sy
286 ±7 MeV
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Ea
sy
!Lab
(deg)
349 ±5 MeV
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
D(",#$n) LEGS run#2, deepUV-1
D(",#$n) T.S.-H. Lee [Impulse]
n(",#$n) SAID[FA04K]
!Lab
(deg)
396 ±7 MeV
D(",#$n)
PD = 30% (avg)
Spring'05
2nd
Production run
% %
- very preliminary -
LEGS exp schedule FY05-06
Experiment schedule - through 2006 :
! FallÕ04:!H !!D(!" ,# o
) to extract!H(!! ," o
) and!H(!! ," +
)
! FYÕ05:!H !!D(!" ,# o
) to extract!D(!! ," o
)
¥ SeptÕ05-JanÕ06: install Time-Projection-Chamber
¥ FebÕ06 ÐAprÕ06: H2(! ," +
) , D2(! ," ±
) calibrations
¥ MayÕ06 ÐJuneÕ06:!H !!D(!" ,# ±
) - run 1
¥ AugÕ06 ÐSeptÕ06:!H !!D(!" ,# ±
) - run 2
extract:!D(!! ," #
),!D(!! ," +
),!H(!! ," +
)
¥ OctÕ06: expected end of LEGS experiments
Figures of merit table - Schaerf/Sandorfi Ð NovÕ05
Figures of merit for Butanol and HD
target
Low-resolution and Low-Intensity
!-beam (a)
high-resolution Low-Intensity
!-beam
(b)
High Intensity
!-beam
(c)
Nuclear-background-limited
High Intensity
!-beam (d)
Atomic-background-limited
High Intensity
!-beam (e)
Figure of merit
"eff (P eff)2
1.4 "eff (P' eff)2
(P eff)2 (P eff)
2/A (P eff)
2/Z
2
p in C4H9OH
0.017 0.110 0.23 0.0031 0.0069
n in C4D9OD
0.010 0.010 0.18 0.0021 0.0070
p in HD
0.019 0.067 0.45 0.1500 0.4500
n in HD
0.010 0.014 0.46 0.1500 0.4500
(a) count rate is beam-limited; reactions on p, n distinguished; bound vs free not distinguished; Peff = P¥f
(b) count rate is beam-limited; reactions on p, n distinguished; bound vs free distinguished with cut; Peff = P¥[ Pfree / (Pfree + 0.2¥Pbound) ]
(c) beam flux can be increased as needed; count rate is limited by accidentals; Peff = P¥f
(d) beam flux can be increased as needed; count rate is limited by dead time from nuclear events; Peff = P¥f
(e) beam flux can be increased as needed; count rate is limited by dead time from atomic electrons; Peff = P¥f
complete set of exp
Complete set of measurements with longitudinal target polarization: target beam (1a) P1(H) P1(D) CR , CL , L
(1b) Ð P1(H) P1(D) CR , CL , L
(2a) P2(H) P2(D) CR , CL , L
(2b) Ð P2(H) P2(D) CR , CL , L
separates separates
rH and
rD Dvector and Dtensor
observables observables
- example: ! + HD " #o (from LEGS/BNL)
separates
!, G, E
Separate reactions to n from p with TPC
+ n � p + �--
� n + �0
+ p � n + �+
� p + �0
Separate !
Central tracking_OctÕ05
Central tracking with magnetic analysis in a Time-Projection Chamber
¥ isolate neutron reactions:
! + n " #Ð p
separate
D(! , "Ð p) from D(! , "+ n)
measure the #± charge
TPCLarge-bore 2 tesla solenoid
p" -
" +
LEGS spin experiments
1. Compton backward-scattered polarzied γ beam
3. Polarized HD solid target
0.17 < Eγ < 0.42 GeV
< Pγ > ∼ 90 %
2. 4 π detector
(σ1/2
− σ3/2
)/ Εγ ;
Total cross sections
The LEGS-Spin Collaboration
¥ Brookhaven National Laboratory
A. Caracappa, S. Hoblit, O. Kistner, F. Lincoln, L. Miceli, M. Lowry, A.M. SandorÞ *, C. Thorn, X. Wei
¥ Forschungszentrum J�lich GmbH
M. Pap, H. Gl�ckler, H. Seyfarth, H. Str�her
¥ James Madison University
C. S. Whisnant
¥ Norfolk State University
M. Khandakar
¥ Ohio University
C. Bade, K. Hicks *, M. Lucas, J. Mahon, S. Kizigul
¥ Syracuse University
A. Honig
¥ University di Roma - Tor Vergata
A. DÕAngelo *, A. dÕAngelo, D. Moricciani, C. Schaerf, R. Di Salvo, A. Fantini
¥ University of South Carolina
K. Ardashev, C. Gibson, B. M. Preedom *, A. Lehmann
¥ University of Virginia
S. Kucuker, R. Lindgren, B. Norum, K. Wang
¥ Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University
M. Blecher, T. Kageya
37 people from
10 institutions in
3 countries
LSC list MayÕ05
Post-Docs (NSF)
Grad Students
* LSC Executive com
γγγγ
ee′′′′
Laser-Electron-Gamma-Source (LEGS)
4ωωωω Nd-YLF
ring laser
Ar-Ion laser
λλλλ(nm) 263 300 351 488 515
Eγγγγ
(max)
471
MeV
421
MeV
368
MeV
275
MeV
262
MeV
NSLS Ee = 2.8 GeV
200 250 300 350 400
Inte
nsi
ty (
arb
. u
nit
s)
Eγγγγ (MeV)
263 nm & 351 nm
263 nm only
Eγγγγ400300
γγγγ beam energy determined by e′′′′ tagging
Eγγγγ = Ee - Ee′′′′ , ∆∆∆∆Eγγγγ = 3 MeVE tag
(min) = 150-180 MeV
SASYSASY CurrentCurrent SetupSetup
γ
Separating H and D data
Separating!H and
!D data with spin flip - example, !o production
Run A:!H !!D with parallel spins Run B:
!H !"D with anti-parallel spins
! !" LA= !
"p(!" ,# o
)$% &' +!"D(!" ,# o
)$% &'
! "" RA= !
"p("" ,# o
)$% &' +!"D("" ,# o
)$% &'
! !" LB= !
!p(!" ,# o
)$% &' +!"D(!" ,# o
)$% &'
! "" RB= !
!p("" ,# o
)$% &' +!"D("" ,# o
)$% &'
!" (p) = " 3/2 #" 1/2( )p= " !$ R
B #" !$ RA%& '( + " "$ L
A #" "$ LB%& '( from "p # !op
$
!" (D) = " 3/2 #" 1/2( )D= " !$
L
A #" "$R
B%& '( + " !$L
B #" "$R
A%& '( from "D # !oX
- similarily, runs with different PD separate Vector and Tensor D-observables
- in general, one fits out different observables from runs with different polarizations
!,"#
"#
!,"#
!,"#
$
µ
!
! "#
Before
After
After
DBefore
H
Forbidden Adiabatic Fast Passage
Efficiency of transfer = 67%
!! " #
! "#
$
�
% , & , #
�
(!)
��� � � � �� � �
��� � � ���
�� �� ���� � � ��
� �� � � � ��� � � � �� � � ��
HD target cycle:
target injection into dilution fridge;
~min 45 days at 15 Tesla / 12 mK
loading In-Beam-Cryostat
¥ 0.25!K and 1.00 Tesla
extraction with Transfer-Cryostat
¥ 2.5!K and 0.120 T
5 cm
HD target cycle-OctÕ04