RARE PRIDE CAMPAIGN PROJECT PLAN for the

Uson Buang Pongco-Bonga Fish Sanctuary and Marine Reserveby the

Department of Environment and Natural Resources Region VLocal Government of Bacacay, Albay

andRare Conservation

Ruby Mendones, Conservation Fellow

Campaign Project Plan Table of ContentsA. Executive Summary

1. Introduction - Framing the problem 2. Campaign Theory of Change: a strategy for change -

Table and narrative3. Site summary4. Project team & key strategic partners

B. Social marketing profile 1. Formative Research - TWG & Stakeholder meetings

consensus workshop outputs; Directed Conversations; FGD; Photo voice

2. Concept Model 3. Results Chain 4. Establishing a baseline: quantitative survey 5. Understanding our audience

C. MPA Governance and Management plan (BROP ) 1. Abstract2. Introduction3. Objectives4. MPA profile5. Action plan6. Funding opportunities

D. Monitoring plan E. Work Plan with Budget F. Endorsement of this plan G. References and Acknowledgements H. Appendices

1. Fisheries profile2. Executive Order for TWG & Mancom- May 26-27

“Nothing stops an organization faster than people who believe that the way they worked yesterday is the best way to work tomorrow.”- Jon MadonnaThe significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level at which we created them. –Albert Einstein

2

3. Survey Questionnaire 4. Survey results5. EcoGov MPA Effectiveness Rating 6. Letters of Support 7. Threat ranking8. Factor chain

3

A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. Introduction

Philippines as the centre of the centre of global marine biodiversityScientists refer to the 7,107 islands that make up the Philippines as the “center of the center” of global marine biodiversity. Its waters are home to whales, dolphins, 50 species of sea horses and over 2,000 species fish, including the largest fish in the world, the whale shark. Marine resources are also critical to the food security and livelihoods of Filipinos, as fish provide over 50% of their protein and support the livelihoods of millions of fishers and fish-related industries throughout the country. The Philippines is located in the Coral Triangle, a vast region in Southeast Asia made up of 18,500 islands and 647 million hectares of ocean. It is often referred to as the “nursery of the seas” because of the more than 500 species of coral and hundreds of thousands of hectares of sea grass and coastal mangrove forests that shelter and sustain a level of marine diversity unmatched anywhere on the planet.

Species and Habitat under Complex ThreatsToday, however the global center of marine biodiversity is under extreme pressure. Over 40% of the reef and mangroves in the region have disappeared in the last 40 years. Near-shore overfishing is a serious threat to these natural resources, and reversing the effects will require a significant change in human behavior. Less than five percent of the Philippines’ coral reef ecosystems are still in pristine health, and in some fishing grounds, biomass is less than 10% of what it was 50 years ago. Most near-shore fishing is conducted by subsistence fishers in coastal communities although illegal intrusions by commercial fishers into municipal waters are cause for concern.

A Campaign to Transform the ContextDeveloping local approaches to addressing the threat of overfishing is increasingly recognized as vital to long-term economic and environmental sustainability in the region. The vision behind this plan, and the current cohort of 12 campaign developed under the Rare Pride Program in the Philippines, is to facilitate true community buy and ownership of the local Marine Protected Areas building on the tools developed in 20 years of experience in MPA management in the Philippines and combining it with the Rare Pride Methodology for social marketing. Through this strategy the objective is to get the local fishers population as well as the wider

4

community in the Barangays surrounding the MPA to take ownership in and understand the benefit of no-take-areas and support essential management activities such as enforcement and governance of the MPA.

Cohort Theory of change: a strategy for change

In order to eliminate the principle threat of overfishing and destructive fishing the governance and enforcement infrastructures of the no-take-zone (NTZ) at 12 sites in the Philippines will be strengthened via a proven self-assessment and planning tool, the Participatory Coastal Resources Assessment tool (PCRA). Key target audiences (local fishers and gleaners; the local community, the MPA enforcement team and local LGU officials) will be informed of the benefits of the No Take Zone (NTZ), the rules of the sanctuary, and the processes for becoming more engaged in the MPA management committee. Fishers and gleaners will come to believe in MPA as a tool for food security, and will support new reporting structures for arrests and prosecution of intruders. The conservation results will include increased perceived fish catch, increases in fish numbers and species richness, increase in invertebrates, and increase in coral reef health.

5

2. Uson Buang Pongco Bonga Campaign Theory of Change

Theory of Change:

K + A + IC + BR BC TR CRTA1.Primary Fishers (from

Uson, Buang and Pongo Bonga)

know the benefits and the

rules from the NTZ

TA2 Organized community (secondary)

.Awareness of the role at their level in pursuing

plans and programs for the MPA and aware

of benefits of MPA

Fishers fully convinced that the MPA is both a source of sustained income and food therefore they must believe they can stop intrusion in the NTZ

Organized communities are willing to participate in and support meetings and activities related to MPA

fishers discuss with one another

the consequences of

breaking the rules and their role in the MPA

management

They will talk among

themselves their role in managing

local marine resources for the

community

The local mgt. Council is

strengthened to enforce the

regulation on the MPA and in

implementing the Mgt Council Plan

They will entrust the leadership of

UBPBFSMR

Increase the number of

fishermen to stop intruding into the

NTZ Increase the number of

fishermen to sustain support to

NTZ by passing intelligence to Mgt

Council and enforcers

Increased level of participation in

MPA management

Reduced incidence of

intrusion and fishing inside the MPA NTZ

Increase in fish catch; increase fish biomass;

increase in reef health

6

K + A + IC + BR BC TR CR TA 3.

Communities (primary)

Communities are aware of the benefits and

regulations of their NTZ and know who to

report to

TA4 (secondary)Awareness of the MPA structures,

levels of authority and corresponding

functions, duties and

responsibilities in achieving goals

for the MPA

Communities have increased level of support in the enforcement of regulations in the MPA

Performs their role in providing CRM services in the 36 coastal barangays including MPA management in Uson Buang Pongco Bonga

communities discuss with one

another their role in reporting

intrusions, violations in

support to MPA management

Key LGU employees will

discuss with each other their role to

further strengthen the MPA structure

The Council is strengthened to

enforce the regulation on the

MPA and in implementing the Mgt Council Plan

Increased protection through

monitoring effectiveness of

regulations in the MPA

increase the number of community

members who sustain support to NTZ by reporting

violations, intrusions

For the Local Goverrnment Unit

employees to afford the MPA

sustained policy support

Reduced incidence of

intrusion and fishing inside the MPA NTZ

Inncrease in fish catch; increase fish biomass;

increase in reef health

7

Theory of Change narrative:

Theory of Change narrative: In order to reduce the threat of increased incidence of intrusion and fishing inside the MPA NTZ, the target audiences comprised of fishers & costal residents from Uson, Buang and Pongo Bongawill (primary TA), and organized groups and key LGU employees (secondary/BR groups the campaign will work with) from will be made aware of the benefits of having an NTZ as well as the rules and regulations with regard to the NTZ.

The behavior change will become evident when the MPA rules are actively enforced leading to an increase in arrests and prosecutions of intruders into the MPA. Also, the fishers are encouraged to voluntarily comply with MPA rules. This will result in reduced fishing in the MPA and increased sustainable fishing gears such as hook and line.

In the end, the campaign’s impact will be measured by significant changes (knowledge, attitudes and behavior), increased coral reef health, increased fish numbers/biomass/species richness, increased invertebrate numbers /species richness and fishers’, and increased perceived fish catch.

The campaign will be successful if the live hard coral cover and fish density increase by 10 percent by July 2012 (compared to baseline from May 2011). Shifts from negative attitudes that sees MPAs as a restriction on their livelihood and fishing shift to perception of the MPA as a food security “bank of the sea” that brings benefits to the whole community and future generations in the form of dividends of increased fish catch around the MPA.

8

3. Site summary(This section corresponds to the site summary created during the first University Phase. Please revise it, noting that a few minor changes have been made to the information required, and insert it here)Project Name

Project Name Uson Buang Pongco Bonga Fish Sanctuary and Marine Reserve

Project Data Effective Date 2011-06-12 Project Scope and Vision

Scope/Site Name Bgy. Uson

Scope/Site Description A 46.25-hectare “No Take Zone” in Bacacay, Albay established and supported by the Local Government Unit in keeping with its being a DENR declared a Priority Marine Protection Area for its being a migratory path of whalesharks,tuna, reef fishes, and other marine species.

Vision Statement Text A model learning site that showcases the many different benefits of having a balanced coastal and marine ecosystem that is well-managed by its stakeholders with institutionalized and functioning systems.

Biodiversity FeaturesBiodiversity Area Amount of hectares in site Municipal waters: 165,000 has; coastline: 143 km; 45.63 NTZ; land

area of Municipality 616 has; area of MPA: 11,220 has; fishery reserve: 453.25 has

Biodiversity Background 1. An overview of the area’s biodiversity, including ecosystem types and an estimate for species richness for as many groups as possible (refer to data from

1.Reef: 3 sites 38.8 % live coral cover having acropora and non-acropora spp., presence of Halimeda spp. (algae); tridacna; seagrass and mangroves (no status assessment

9

similar sites where need be). 2. List any recent research on

the site’s biodiversity (provide full references for all work in last decade).

3. Provide a list of vegetation types, including the main types of woodland, grassland and similar communities, and cultivated land, indicating whether any are of particular conservation interest.

4. Provide a list of introduced species. Where possible, include English, local, and scientific nomenclature, and indicate whether the species is causing any problems and to what extent.

5. Provide information on other species of special interest (perhaps they are taxonomically unique in some way, are valuable for medical or other purposes), potential flagship species, etc.

2. Fish census 9/25/01 by BFAR Benthic lifeform assessment 9/25/01 by BFAR

3. Mangrove spp dominated by Bakauan spp (Rhizopora apiculata; coconut, pandan spp locally called karagomoy

4. no noted introduced spp.

Labridae family are present in good quantity. Reef fishes also present. They are important in aquarium fish trade

Biodiversity FeaturesBiodiversity Area Amount of hectares in site Municipal waters: 165,000 has; coastline: 143 km; 45.63 NTZ; land

area of Municipality 616 has; area of MPA: 11,220 has; fishery reserve: 453.25 has

Biodiversity Background 1. An overview of the area’s 1.Reef: 3 sites 38.8 % live coral cover having acropora and non-

10

biodiversity, including ecosystem types and an estimate for species richness for as many groups as possible (refer to data from similar sites where need be).

2. List any recent research on the site’s biodiversity (provide full references for all work in last decade).

3. Provide a list of vegetation types, including the main types of woodland, grassland and similar communities, and cultivated land, indicating whether any are of particular conservation interest.

4. Provide a list of introduced species. Where possible, include English, local, and scientific nomenclature, and indicate whether the species is causing any problems and to what extent.

5. Provide information on other species of special interest (perhaps they are taxonomically unique in some way, are valuable for medical or other purposes), potential flagship species, etc.

acropora spp., presence of Halimeda spp. (algae); tridacna; seagrass and mangroves (no status assessment

2. Fish census 9/25/01 by BFAR Benthic lifeform assessment 9/25/01 by BFAR

3. Mangrove spp dominated by Bakauan spp (Rhizopora apiculata; coconut, pandan spp locally called karagomoy

4. no noted introduced spp.

Labridae family are present in good quantity. Reef fishes also present. They are important in aquarium fish trade

11

Protected Area Categories What is the status of the protected area? What are the main threats to the area?

Declared FSMR Municipal Ordinance No. 107 s. 2002

Legal Status Information about the various legal statutes and regulations relevant to your site and the wildlife that live there.

Priority Marine Resources Conservation (having been part of Albay Gulf) as declared by DENR in 1997 for reef fishes, whaleshark, tuna, elasmobranchs

Legislative Context List all the formal legal instruments which relate to your site (“soft” and “hard”): International Conventions your country has signed on to, special international designations it might boast (e.g., a World Heritage Site, Man and Biosphere Reserve), any relevant national and local conservation-related legislation, and deeds of public/private ownership of your site. As you do so, give them a score from 1-5 according to how effective you think they presently are (with 1=not effective and 5=very effective).

1. Ramsar, IUCN, CBD, Coral triangle2. RA 8550-Fisheries Code of the Philippines3. Albay Provincial Environment Code of 20024. Ordinance No. 107 s 2002 by LGU Bacacay

Physical Description Description of the site; is it mountainous, forested, coral reef, etc. Topographical information of the site. Climatic information of the site.

Rolling and undulating terrain, Type II climate Rainy season from October to January and dry season from February to September. Average temperature is 22 degrees Celsius on rainy wet and 27.07 degrees Celsius on wet season.

Biological Description Biological description of the site that has not been discussed elsewhere and that you want to have in your reports.

Nine islets: Bogias, Pagliswican, Umagob, Masaginsin, Tumarab, Langaton, and two islands in Namanday and CAGRARAY where the MPA is located. There are five mangrove species identified and existing in the municipality. A total of 136.55 ha is devoted to aquaculture ponds. Seagrass patches located in Uson and Tambilagao area. Algae and seaweeds also present in Uson. Green algae locally known as lato are

12

found in Nahapunan, Bariw and Damacan, all of Sula Channel. Eucheuma culture known as gulaman can be grown in Namanday, Tambilagao, Cagbulacao, Busdac and Buang.

Socio-Economic Information

Description of the economy at the site. Make a list of all the living and non-living resources that are presently being extracted from your site. Where possible, give some measure of the value of these products in local currency (per item, kilo, bundle, etc.). As a way of putting these numbers into a meaningful context, indicate how much a laborer would normally be paid by the hour or for a day’s work.

Fishery dependent population based on LGU existing data (2010). Mat weaving is an alternative source of income. Average mat production is two mats per day per person at 100 pesos per mat sold in the City of Tabaco. A laborer is paid some 250 pesos for a day’s work. Deep sea fishers on the average get 10 kilos per fishing effort, shallow water fishers get two kilos per fishing effort.

Historical Description Brief overview of the history of the site. Do other countries contest it? Has it been logged? When was it made into a protected area? Was the site once part of a colony?

It was founded in 1649. It was made into Protected Area in 2002. It was not logged, original vegetation remains. No huge trees since upland is dependent on rain. Not farmed either.

Cultural Description Description of the main cultural groups at or near the site. What religions are practiced? Are the people a minority group within the country? Are there any cultural traditions that you need to know in order to be able to work in the site, for example, special holidays, or beliefs about how the site should be treated?

Native Bicolanos who speak Bicol inhabit the area. Majority is Roman Catholic. Feast Day is every August 16th.

Access Information Description of how to access the site (by boat only? By car using what roads, etc). Give times when access

Access is only by boat. Difficult to access during northeast monsoon. From Tabaco City there is daily trip to Uson at 12.00 noon. The boat leaves the next day for Tabaco City Port located in Bgy. San Roque.

13

is harder or easier due to things like rainy season or winters.

Visitation Information Details on what someone should know in order to visit the site, for example where they should originate their trip, or who might rent them a boat.

They must start trip from Legazpi City. They then must take a bus to Tabaco City then form Tabaco City take a tricycle to Bgy San Roque where the port to Uson is located. Chartered trips may be arranged with Mike Basallote

Current Land Uses Information about land tenure and land use at the site.

Predominantly agricultural; Alienable and disposable with patches of timberland along the villages outside the site e.g. Salvacion

Management Resources Description of the management structure, resources, organizations, roles, and any other information relevant to management of the site.

The Local Government Unit of Bacacay at the Municipal level assumes over-all management on the FSMR. The Mayor is directly supported by the Mun. Adricultural Officer-Pio Caneso who has oversight function on the FSMR Management Council. The Management Council is supported by four functional units: Fishery Law Enforcement Team, Surveillance Team; Sanctuary Maintenance; and Monitoring and Evaluation. The latter is manned by LGU, Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources and other government entities like the DENR.

IUCN Red-list SpeciesRed-List Species Enter the common and scientific

names of any species at your site that are listed by IUCN Red Data list and give a brief explanation of why they are listed and what their current status is.

Tridacna sp.- giant clam ( Critically endangered due to overharvesting)Chelonia mydas-Green sea turtles ( Endangered due to habitat destruction; entangled in fish nets and hunted for meat)Rhincodon typus- whaleshark (Endangered due to strandings)Tuna spp.- threatened due to overharvesting or overfishing

Other Notable SpeciesOther Notable Species Common and scientific names of

other important species at your site Wrasse fish (“Mameng” in Filipino and “Bukhawon” in the MPA village (subject to validation as to what particular species hence, no

14

such as endemic species, keystone species, commercial species.

scientific name yet)Pandan spp. Endemic to the site used for mat weaving

Location and Topography

Project Latitude The latitude of your project site using numbers between -90 degrees and 90 degrees.

13°13’-13° 22’

Project Longitude The longitude of your project site using numbers between -180 degrees and 180 degrees.

123°42’-123°57’

Country/Countries The country/countries of your site. PHILIPPINES

States/Provinces The name(s) of the states and/or provinces where your site is located.

ALBAY

Municipalities The name(s) of the municipally/municipalities where your site is located.

BACACAY

Legislative Districts The name(s) of the legislative districts where your site is located.

FIRST DISTRICT OF ALBAY

Location Details A textual narrative about the location.

Bacacay occupies the eastern slope of Mayon Volcano, in Southeast of LUZON ISLANDS, PHILIPPINES descending to the lowlands facing the Pacific Ocean. The town lies on the eastern part of the Province of Albay and includes the island of Cagraray I, it is bounded on the north by Tabaco Bay on the south by the Municipality of Sto. Domingo and Albay Gulf; on the East by Lagonoy Gulf and on the West by the Municipality of Malilipot.

Site Map Reference Paste a GoogleMaps URL into this box (http://maps.google.com/), by locating your site on Google Maps,

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=bacacay+albay+philippines&sll=37.0625,-

15

then click “Link” to have the map of your site referenced.

95.677068&sspn=23.542772,71.015625&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Bacacay,+Albay,+Bicol+4509,+Philippines&t=h&z=11

Comments Any additional information about your site’s location that has not been included above, but you think you will need to be included in your site summary.

Average fish catch per fishing effort of motorized outrigger boat: 10 kilosAverage fish catch per fishing effort of non-motorized boat: 2 kilos

Human StakeholdersHuman Stakeholder Population Size

Total number of people who live within the target site.

3,036 individuals, 535 Households but total population of Albay Gulf fishers:343,269 in 2007 from SUMACORE, Inc.

Social Context Additional information on population, including demographic, geographic, etc.

Albay Gulf: declared Priority Site for Marine Conservation by DENR in 1997.

16

Stakeholder Matrix (Project Team)Given Name

Surname Resource ID

Organization Position Roles Email Phone

Given name Surname Initials or nickname

Name of the organization this person works for

Job title or work description (i.e.

fisher, stakeholder)

Team member, project leader, stakeholder,

project advisor, etc.

Email address

Cell and office phone numbers

Eduardo Castelo Ed MFARMC Chair Stakeholder 09128939583

Pio Caneso Pio Mun. Agric. Office Mun. Agriculturist Project advisor 052-5583243

Danny Barotilla Danny LGU-Pongco-Bonga Bgy. Capt. stakeholder

Gina Bustamante Gina Buang Buang stakeholder

Manuel Basallote Manny LGU-Uson -do- Team member 09198686860

Maria Lourdes

Achero Malou MAO-LGU Bacacay Agric. Technician 09166962307

Joselin Marcus

Fragada RED Marc DENR V RED- Regional Executive Director

Supervisor redreg5@yahoo.com

052-4820691

Felix Mendoza Felix DENR PAWCZMS V

Regional Technical Director

-do- rtdfcmendoza@yahoo.com

09175094970

Mafe Reganit Pot -do- Science Res. Assistant

TWG DENR member

Arnel Boholst Arnel LGU Bacacay President, MFAMMC Bicol Region

Advisor

Fr. Efren Bantog Fr. Efren SOLT-Bgy. Cabasan Parish Priest

Myrna Baylon Mina DENR PAWCZMS Sr. EMS TWG-DENR member

053-4820269

17

Organization MatrixName Role(s) Given Name Surname Email Phone

Name of organization that may be involved or integral to the success of the Pride campaign

Role that this organization might play in the Pride campaign

Primary contact’s given name

Primary contact’s surname

Email address Cell and office phone numbers

AKO Bicol Partylist Legislation, lobbying in CongressSource of supplemental funds for Barrier Removal Strategies

Atty. Rodel Atty. Pido Christopher

BatocabeGarbinCo

www.akobicol.com c/o Rey Kallos09324359666

LGU-Provincial Government of Albay

Source of fund; legislation support and tourism promotion

Gov. Joey Salceda www.albay.gov.phgovoffice@albay.gov.ph

(052) 481 2555. (052) 480 3444

Diocese of Legazpi Barrier Removal Strategy (Mat making and Grameen banking)

Rev. Fr. Ramon “Fr. Monching”

Segubiense sacleg@globalink.net.ph Phone: +63 52 8205302              +63 52 820-5302           Telefax: +63 52 481-2384

AudienceAudiences # of People in Audience Audience Summary

Short name for each target audience

Target audience population

TA1-Fishers 100

TA2-Organized community 100

18

Audiences # of People in Audience Audience SummaryTA3- Coastal residents 1132 -

TA4- key LGU employees 10

ThreatsThe IUCN Threats Classification Scheme http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes/threats-classification-scheme-ver3offers a hierarchical listing of the causes of species decline and gives the following major headings.

1 Residential and Commercial Development1.1 Housing and Urban Areas1.2 Commercial and Industrial Areas1.3 Tourism and Recreation Areas

5 Biological Resource Use5.1 Hunting and Trapping Terrestrial Animals5.1.1 Intentional Mortality (Human Use)5.1.2 Incidental or Accidental Mortality (bycatch)5.1.3 Persecution/control5.1.4 Motivation Unknown/Unrecorded5.2 Gathering Terrestrial Plants5.2.1 Intentional mortality (human use)5.2.2 Incidental or accidental mortality (bycatch)5.2.3 Persecution/control5.2.4 Motivation Unknown/Unrecorded5.3 Logging and Wood Harvesting5.3.1 Intentional mortality (human use - subsistence/small scale)5.3.2 Intentional mortality (human use - large scale)5.3.3 Incidental or accidental mortality (bycatch - subsistence/small

scale)5.3.4 Incidental or accidental mortality (bycatch - large scale)5.3.5 Motivation Unknown/Unrecorded5.4 Fishing & harvesting aquatic resources5.4.1 Intentional mortality (human use - subsistence/small scale)5.4.2 Intentional mortality (human use - large scale)5.4.3 Incidental or accidental mortality (bycatch - subsistence/small

scale)5.4.4 Incidental or accidental mortality (bycatch - large scale)5.4.5 Persecution/control5.4.6 Motivation Unknown/Unrecorded

9 Pollution9.1 Domestic and Urban Waste Water9.1.1 Sewage9.1.2 Run-Off9.1.3 Type Unknown/Unrecorded9.2 Industrial and Military Effluents9.2.1 Oil Spills9.2.2 Seepage from Mining9.2.3 Type Unknown/Unrecorded9.3 Agricultural and Forestry Effluents9.3.1 Nutrient loads9.3.2 Soil erosion, sedimentation9.3.3 Herbicides and pesticides9.3.4 Type Unknown/Unrecorded9.4 Garbage and Solid Waste9.5Air-borne Pollutants9.5.1 Acid Rain9.5.2 Smog9.5.3 Ozone9.5.4 Type Unknown/Unrecorded9.6 Excess Energy9.6.1 Light pollution9.6.2 Thermal pollution9.6.3 Noise pollution9.6.4 Type Unknown/Unrecorded

2 Agriculture and Aquaculture1.4 Annual and Perennial non-timber crops1.4.1 Shifting agriculture1.4.2 Small-holder farming1.4.3 Agro-industry farming1.4.4 Scale Unknown/Unrecorded1.5 Wood & pulp plantations

6 Human Intrusions and Disturbance6.1 Recreational Activities6.2 War, civil unrest and military exercises6.3 Work & other activities

10 Ecological Events10.2 Volcanoes10.2 Earthquakes/tsunamis10.3 Avalanches/landslides

19

1.5.1 Small-holder plantations1.5.2 Agro-industry plantations1.5.3 Scale Unknown/Unrecorded1.6 Livestock farming & ranching1.6.1 Nomadic grazing1.6.2 Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming 1.6.3 Agro-industry grazing, ranching or farming1.6.4 Scale Unknown/Unrecorded1.7 Marine and Freshwater Aquaculture1.7.1 Subsistence/artisinal aquaculture1.7.2 Industrial aquaculture1.7.3 Scale Unknown/Unrecorded

3 Energy Production and Mining3.1 Oil and Gas Drilling 3.2 3.2 Mining & quarrying3.3 3.3 Renewable energy

7 Natural System Modifications7.1 Fire & fire suppression7.1.1 Increase in fire frequency/intensity7.1.2 Suppression in fire frequency/intensity7.1.3 Trend Unknown/Unrecorded7.2 Dams & water management/use 7.2.1 Abstraction of surface water (domestic use)7.2.2 Abstraction of surface water (commercial use)7.2.3 Abstraction of surface water (agricultural use)7.2.4 Abstraction of surface water (unknown use)7.2.5 Abstraction of ground water (domestic use)7.2.6 Abstraction of ground water (commercial use)7.2.7 Abstraction of ground water (agricultural use)7.2.8 Abstraction of ground water (unknown use)7.2.9 Small dams7.2.10 Large dams7.2.11 Dams (size unknown)7.3 Other ecosystem modifications

11 Climate Change and Severe Weather11.1 Habitat shifting and Alteration11.2 Droughts11.3 Temperature extremes11.4 Storms and Flooding11.5 Other impacts

4 Transportation and Service Corridors4.1 Roads & railroads4.2 Utility & service lines4.3 Shipping lanes4.4 Flight paths

8 Invasive and Other Problematic Species and Genes8.1 Invasive non-native/alien species8.1.1 Unspecified species8.1.2 Named species8.2 Problematic native species8.3 Introduced genetic material

12 UnknownAcanthaster plancii crown of thorns predator of reef

Key Biodiversity Targets

Direct Threats Severity Contributing factors [including indirect threats]

Use the full IUCN classifications above to make a list of all the threats you consider the most important to your site and to any notable species within it.

Rate the relative severity of each threat on a scale of 1-4, where 1=low, 2=medium, 3=high, 4 =very high.

20

Tourism and recreation area 2 Misibis Resort on the other end of the island. Pressure on the reef

Soil erosion and sedimentationstorms and flooding

2 Shifting agricultureClimate Change

Acanthaster plancii (CoT)2 Rise in population due to erratic weather patterns

Fishing and harvesting aquatic resources

3 Weak law enforcement in other areas

Fishing & harvesting aquatic resources

4 High market demand for fish productsIncreased number of fishers and human population dependent on fishing as a source of income, and sustenance.

Source of information:Municipal Agriculture Office, Municipality of Bacacay, Albay and Bgy. Capt. Manuel Basallote, LGU Bgy Uson, Bacacay, Albay

B. SOCIAL MARKETING PROFILEThe planning work conducted was ground-truthed with a range of key stakeholders and experts through stakeholder meetings, focus group discussions and one-on-one interviews. These helped to build a composite portrait of the campaign target audiences, and design the quantitative survey (Section B4 and Appendix H) which was subsequently carried out across the campaign target area. The quantitative survey will both help us understand our primary audiences and allow us to establish a baseline for measuring change after the Pride campaign.

The formative research section below aims to provide a record of all qualitative research conducted, people spoken to and key outputs. The sequences in which the results of the formative research are presented here do not necessarily correspond to the chronology in which the data was collected, and in some cases, multiple iterations of the research, such as directed conversations with target audiences, were required.

21

1. Formative research

1. NAME: LARRY BARRAMEDAOCCUPATION: FISH BOAT OPERATOR AND BARANGAY COUNCIL MEMBER (USON)GIST OF DISCUSSION: Larry is not dependent on fishing. It is his secondary source of income. But to the fishers using his boat, fishing is their primary source of income. He has seen how fish catch has declined through the years. He ran for a position in the Council thinking he could help other fishers find ways to make ends meet. At the PCRA, he learned the interconnectivity of the ecosystems and is so interested at developing a tour package in the village. He said he realized how important it is to develop and protect the mangroves, seagrass and coral reefs so people could come and learn from them. He also talked about developing food stations where people could come and eat fresh seafood or simply tour around the mangroves. He is interested in sponsoring an ordinance that would put money in erecting board walks and signages. He finished Hotel and Restaurant Management so he sees himself managing a restaurant in the village in the coming years. He was so drawn to the benefits of the sea that he volunteered to take the students to neighboring villages for the KAP survey.

Kagawad Larry Barrameda ( center wearing white shirt and white cap) with some of his colleagues at the Council and local village police who kept watch over the student-enumerators during the KAP survey.He receives honorarium amounting to 250 pesos from the Bicol University during the awards night in Uson. The honorarium was a surprise to him and to the other village officials who facilitated the activity. He explainins the resource map of Uson that he and his groupmates have drawn at the PCRA.

22

2. NAME: Franscisco BalingbingOCCUPATION: Fisher

GIST OF DISCUSSION: He has expressed optimism that the new leadership of Mayor Betito will continue to support what they have established in 2001. He has noted however, the decrease in logistics support from the Municipal LGU. He noted some mismanagement in the Sanctuary and noted increased violations over the last five years. He continues to fish for a living and would be interested to volunteer again should he see any concrete steps and enabling mechanisms for fishers to be actively involved in MPA management.

3. NAME: LORENZO BARBACENA

OCCUPATION: FisherGIST OF DISCUSSION:Mr. Barbacena is very passionate about the sea. He has seen how the local fishery resource fed and sustained the lives of the villagers. He has seen the wrath of typhoons and the bounty of the sea. He is an active member of the core group that established the fish sanctuary. He is well respected in the village and is quick to relate the sea with the Church doctrine of creation and dominion. He admitted having used dynamite before because in the old days it was popular and people really needed to use dynamite to catch too many schools of fish. He later learned the disadvantage of dynamite fishing and of using efficient fishery implements when fish catch declined. He expressed hope for the sea. He welcomes people who come to their village to help the locals and those who want to enjoy the beauty of nature that are under their stewardship.

(L-R) Mr. Balingbing and son being interviewed during the KAP survey. Mr. Barbacena (leftmost) with his groupmates at the recently held PCRA.

23

Eduardo Castelo, MFARMC Chair “The Municipal Ordinance of the MPA was adapted from the Philippine Fisheries Code ( RA 8550). He said that there are policies to protect the marine resources of Bacacay. They Organized a “Bantay Dagat” team to secure the protection of the marine resources. He also said that some fishing activities are destructive for the marine habitat. He cited “tanking tamba” as an example. They also conduct patrolling through deputized Bantay Dagat in the barangay. He also stated that the process of enforcement starts with the information dissemination to the residents and fishers regarding ordinances being implemented. If problems or violations like illegal fishing occur, the local police would take appropriate action. There are also consultations for the fishers regarding the fishing ordinance. Member of the MFARMC coordinated with each other to manage the implementation of the policy and to maintain the proper implementation for the whole barangay.”

Arnel Boholst, Regional Fisherfolk representative; MFARMC Chair 1998 to 2009. He said that the FLET of Bacacay implements the Fishery Rules and Regulations within the municipal waters. This enforcement team is also in charge of the proper dissemination of information regarding the rules and regulations they implement. Members of MFARMC cooperate in the implementation of policies. They give “humanitarian consideration” to those who have committed the offense for the first time. Those who committed serious offenses are put to jail.

Lourdes Cerillo, Secretary of MFARMC.She took part in clean up drives and she just replaced Rosalinda Baron, former secretary who died. She admitted not to know too much about MFARMC.

Rodrigo Borromeo, Auditor, MFARMC considers having a fish sanctuary in Bacacay Albay a privilege. They said to have worked hard to prohibit illegal activities. They coordinate with fishers and police force to introduce the programs to minimize illegal fishing.

Alberto Baron, member of MFARMC, Roberto Beatriz and Rolando Bibon said they are focusing on cleaning the sea from solid waste.They said they warn the violators upon committing first offense. They said they anticipate conflicts since the violators are insistent that they catch fish using illegal methods. According to Ramiro Bartumen, MFARMC member, they give nets to deserving fishers. Edgardo Baron, MFARMC member said they coordinate with the residents to implement fishery policies. They encourage people to have alternative sources of income so they will not abuse the marine resources. In cases of violations, imprisonment and penalties are likely the consequences.

Outputs from the consensus workshop and vote on benefits from the MPA at your TWG and stakeholder meeting.

24

Further you can include here:- Outputs from Focus Group Discussions- Photo voice- Any other relevant qualitative research

As a guide you can also reference the Formative research and directed conversations section E p 38 to 43 in Lola)

2. Concept Model

All Rare Pride campaigns start with building a concept model, which is a tool for visually depicting the situation at the project site. Through validation with several stakeholders and marine experts Stuart Green, Pablo Roxas and MERF Marine Scientists . The following concept model was developed illustrating the conservation target, indirect threats and contributing factors at Uson Buang Pongco Bonga. The model was created using the Miradi software. Miradi is being developed to assist conservation practitioners going through the adaptive management process outlined in the Conservation Measures Partnership's Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation (www.miradi.org). It entails a standardized nomenclature and threat taxonomy developed by the IUCN. The following chart is what the Uson MPA concept model looks like once all of the direct and contributing factors to the Uson MPA have been inputted. The connecting arrows highlight the relationship between the factors and how they impact different targets in the Uson Buang Pongco Bonga MPA NTZ.

25

26

3. Results ChainResults chains clearly and concisely lay out the expected sequence of results that the campaign is expected to create all along our Theory of Change for each of our target audiences. It is generally recognized that before adopting a new behavior a person moves through a series of stages. These stages can be summarized as pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, validation, action, and maintenance. Not all individuals in a target segment will be in the same stage of behavior change, so activities and messages will need to be tailored to the different stages at which the target audiences are. Understanding the steps in our results chain has also helped narrow down our preliminary objectives for each target audience before we begin collecting data.

The campaign’s proposed approach can be represented as three results chain, two for the primary audience to be targeted (fishers and community from Uson, Buana and Pongco-Bonga) and a further one for community representatives that will become part of the Managament Committee (secondary TA)

27

28

The basis for building the above results chains was the concept model illustrated in section B2 as well as the threat ranking and factor chains included that were subsequently developed in consultation with partners and stakeholders ( see Appendix H7 and H8). The threat ranking helped identify the priority threat to be addressed by the campaign, based on scope, severity and irreversibility of the threat at the site. The factor chains subsequently served to illustrate the causal sequence of factors that lie behind the primary threat and the target groups that the campaign needs to reach to address the threat. The result chains illustrate the results required to achieve the campaign’s desired goals and aim to constitute a road map for changes the campaign would like to bring about for each target audience. The result chains were also used as a foundation for developing the campaign quantitative survey and obtaining the information 1 that would be required to design effective social marketing and behavior change interventions for the campaign.

1

29

4. Establishing a Baseline: Quantitative surveyAfter conducting qualitative research the LAP conducted a quantitative survey of adults living in XXX. This pre-campaign survey was conducted in March 2010 to gain a better understanding of the knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) of the target audiences in relation to the MPA and desired behavior changes as well as to establish a baseline for measuring the impact of the campaign on these audiences through the campaign. The results from the KAP survey are the basis for the creation of SMART objectives relating to the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) components of the campaign’s Theory-of-Change (ToC).

A second post campaign survey will be conducted at the end of one year of the campaign activities being implemented in May 2009 to measure any change in these KAP variables in order to assess the level of attainment of the SMART objectives. A full description of the results can be found in the Project Plan Appendix F4. The following table summarizes the number of people interviewed and the geographical distribution of the survey.

Geographic scope of survey

Fig. __ Satellite photos of the villages covered by the MPA (Red box shows the no take zone (not on scale)

30

Survey target audiences and sample size

N of peopleSample size at95%CL and 3%CI

Sample size at95%CL and 5%CI

Final sample size choice

TA 1 primary(fishers in three -Uson; Buang, Pongco-Bonga villages 100)-no intrusion, intelligence, sustain support)

92 80 92

TA 2 (organized groups -100 BFARMC, MFARMC, BDC, ManCom)- active management

92 80 92

TA 3 primary (406-Uson; 726 from Buang, Pongco-Bonga)Community within the three villages covered by the FSMR (MPA)- passing intelligence, participation in FSMR management )

1132 243-Uson328-Buang.Pongoc-Bonga=571

243

TA 4 KEY LGU employees- (Budget, Planning and Devt., PNP Chief, DILG officer, Gen Services Chief, AT (3) Mayor and Vice Mayor- reinforce policy support to Uson FSMR

10 10 10

Total 1326 741 427

31

Sampling methodology

TA1Fishers in three villages

TA2 –organized groups (BFARMC, MFARMC, ManCom)

TA3 – Communities within the coastal villages

TA4- LGU key people

Stratified sampling

Geographic scope of survey

N of people in listed locality

N of TA in locality

% of total TA in locality

sample size for TA in locality

N of TA in locality

% of total TA in locality

sample size for TA in locality

N of TA in locality

% of total TA in locality

sample size for TA in locality

N of TA in locality

% of toal TA in locality

Sample size for TA in locality

Barangay 1 –Uson

659 40 - 40 40 - 40 120 243

Barangay 2-Buang and Pongco

1317+931=2248

60 - 60 60 - 60 724 152

LGU 100 100 100 100 1132 10 10TOTAL 2,907 1132 10Respondent selection method(This should be written in such a way that someone trying to replicate the survey has enough information to be able to use the same method)

Fifteen enumerators will be tasked to interview fishermen in the two sites. One group composed of seven will take charge in interviewing TA 1 while the other group composed of 8 members will be tasked to cover TA 2 sites. The upper left portion of each set of questionnaires will be marked for an enumerator to distinguish which form goes to what group of interviewees.

Same grouping of enumerators will be tasked to interview two sites. There will be total enumeration of interviewees so that all 100 of them will be included in the sample size.

Random sampling will be carried out by dividing the area into grids for random site selection. Since the households are spaced sporadically, then the enumerators could determine by judgment which households to choose and would take note of those who refuse to cooperate with the enumerators.

Total enumeration of identified respondents.

32

Survey planning

Total survey sample size 427Time for enumerator to do one survey 0.5 hrN of hrs enumerator works a day 5 hrsN of surveys one enumerator can do a day 8N of enumerators available 57N of surveys done a day by total n of enumerators 427N of days needed to do survey 1Additional days needed for travel if any 2Dates for training of enumerators & final survey testing April 12, 2011Beginning and end date of survey April 27-29, 2011N of people available to do data entry 2Beginning date of data entry May 4, 2011Date of completion of data entry May 25, 2011

33

5. Understanding our audience

TA1 - PRIMARY AUDIENCE – FISHERS ( N= 100)

What do we know about this group?

THE TARGET AUDIENCE 1 IS IN THE CONTEMPLATION STAGE. By definition, this means that the fishers are aware of the proposition but ambivalent about changing. During this stage they assess barriers ( time, expense, hassle, fear) as well as the benefits of change.

42 percent of the fishers live in Uson, while 51 percent in other areas within the municipality of Bacacay while some 7 percent live in other municipalities. Some 19 percent of the fishers were aged 55 or older and 18 percent were aged 35-39. Some 42.6 percent have attained some or all secondary education while 41 percent achieved some or all intermediate education. Majority (97 percent) was Roman Catholics, most or 71 percent were male. Some 62 percent considered fishing as primary source of income. The average number of people living in their household was between 2-6 with 78 percent. More than half or 62.4 percent lived within the annual income of 30,000 pesos or below while half or 52.8 percent of the fishers used nets or what is locally known as “hikot”.

Knowledge83 percent can list the benefits of the NTZ.

Some 70 percent of the fishers agreed that the local fishers regularly participate in the management decisions of the NTZ.Some 69 percent of the fishers know who to report to in cases when there is intrusion. 4 percent of the fishers often follow the regulations of the NTZ.

Attitude36 percent of the fishers think it is easy to report violations of rules and regulations such as intursion to NTZ.

Some 82.9 percent of the fishers listed at least one benefit of having a No Take Zone. Some 69 percent said violations and intrusions must be reported to local police, local law enforcers or village heads. Some 51 percent said the local community benefits from having a NTZ nearby.Their attitude towards the MPA as it relates with fish catch is that MPA caused decreased in their yield. Results showed that some 44.8 percent of the fishers believed that fish has decreased as a result of MPA establishment.Some 89.8 percent strongly agreed or agreed on the fact that the fishers know the boundaries of the NTZ.

34

Practice Some 66 percent concurred that no one can collect shells or fish inside the Fish Sanctuary. Preferred radio station was Bombo Radyo at 36.4 percent followed by DZGB at 23.9 percent. 73 percent of fishers have not discussed with each other regarding the consequences of breaking the rule on MPA

Trusted sourcesTheir top three trusted sources of information on the environment were as follows: religious leaders (19.6 percent); TV person ad DENR (both at 14.1 percent); and person on radio at 6.5 percent.It is noteworthy that 14.4 percent do not listen to radio

Media sourcesThe fishers primarily trust family and friends as source of information (96. 8 percent); followed by public meeting (96.6 percent); Television (92.7 percent); DENR (92.5 %) and local leaders and teachers (both at 91.3 percent)

Any other relevant information

The top three choices for flagship species include: lobster (55 percent) snapper (45.7 percent) and sea turtles (34 percent). The three ways by which fishers believe they would be affected by climate change were: increased water temperature leading to death of corals and less fish (45 percent); sea level rise ( 33 percent and increased typhoon strength less reliable work and crops (31 percent).

Comments There are media resources available such as a port area where people aggregate in Buang, a concentration of school building, bgy hall and daycare center in Uson and a port area in Pongco Bonga.

TA2 - SECONDARY AUDIENCE – Organized groups in the community (N=100)

What do we know about this group?

THE TARGET AUDIENCE 2 ARE IN THE CONTEMPLATION STAGE. Like the target audience 1 (fishers), this implies that the members of the organized groups are aware that there is a problem in their behavior as regards their attendance to meeting regarding the NTZ and the UBPBFSMR upkeep in general, in the last six months but are ambivalent in changing.Half or 55.6 percent of the organized groups said fish catch stayed the same despite the presence of the MPA.

Knowledge 67 percent of the organized community members saw benefits of having a NTZ in the vicinity. Also, 91.7 % has knowledge of the boundaries of the NTZ. Some 75 percent of them said no one can collect shells or fish inside the UBPBFSMR. 56 percent know who to report intrusions to.

35

Attitude 46 percent of the organized groups says it is easy to attend at least six meetings of the UPBBFSMR mgt. committee in 12 months; Also, 90.9 percent said they support or strongly support for increasing the enforcement of rules of the MPA. 39 percent of the organized community will entrust the leadership of UBPBFSMR to community members and local village officials.

Practice 64 percent of the organized community said they have not talked to anyone about their role in managing the MPA. 39 percent of fishers and local leaders are most involved in decision making in the NTZ the past 6 months.

Trusted sources

Target audience 2 listed radio, law enforcement official and television as trusted sources of information.

Media sources

58.3% of this target group sampled in the campaign’s questionnaire survey preferred news as media format . 23% listened to the radio daily (6.00 am to 2.00 pm being preferred listening times); 54.5% do not read the newspaper. Preferred media format was video at 30.8 percent however, drama, comedy, puppet show were less liked.

Any other relevant information

The residents are sporadically located in the three villages hence, the use of media resources such as presence of barangay hall, port area and docking area of fishers could help achieve goals for KAIC.Majority or 61 percent believed they will be affected by typhoon strength and less reliable work and crops followed by increase in typhoon frequency (54 percent) and sea level rise.

Comments

TA3 - PRIMARY AUDIENCE – COASTAL RESIDENTS (N=1132)

What do we know about this group?

The behavior stage of TA 3 is consistent with those of the other two target audiences- contemplation. Half or 45.4 percent some or all secondary completed; 97 percent are Catholics. Mat making is the source of income at 28.27 percent followed by agriculture at 19.6 percent and fishing at 18.90 percent.

Knowledge65 percent of the residents are aware of the benefits and regulations of their NTZ and know who to report to in case of intrusion is high at 78.8 percent

36

AttitudeCommunities have increased level of support in the enforcement of regulations in the MPA is 63.8 percent.

64 percent of the organized community said they have not talked to anyone about their role in managing the MPA

PracticeOnly 3.1 percent have reported two or more intrusions in the MPA to the enforcement team in the last 6 months

Trusted sources

DENR is considered most trustworthy at 35 percent; followed by law enforcement officials, local government environment officials, person on radio and person on television.

Media sources

Primetime Bida or a series of television soaps account for the most preferred medium at 17.2 percent followed by news at 13.8 percent; books and documentary show are least preferred.

Any other relevant information

The residents considered increase in water temperature leading to death of corals and less fish as the leading manner by which they could be affected by climate change followed by increase in typhoon strength less reliable work and crops and sea level rise. Snapper is the most popular creature followed by lobster and sea turtle.

Comments

TA4 - SECONDARY AUDIENCE – LGU (data from quantitative and qualitative research conducted for this campaign, see Appendix H4

What do we know about this group?

This group make up for a small number of innovators but are crucial in sustaining the gains of social marketing in the sense that they determine priorities for fund allocation. They review policy agenda and could spell the difference in implementation in the succeesing years after the social marketing campaign is done.

KnowledgeSome 100 percent listed local police, local enforcers and village head as persons to report to in case there is intrusion. They registered the highest value for knowledge among the four target audiences hence only the KAIC were given attention in terms of behavior change. They will be made aware of he MPA structures, levels of authority and corresponding functions, duties and responsibilities in achieving goals for the MPA

AttitudePerforms their role in providing CRM services in the 36 coastal barangays including MPA management in Uson Buang Pongco Bonga

Half ot the target audience 4 have talked to local government environment officials about their role in reporting

37

Practice intrusions.

Trusted sources

Not prioritized

Media sources

Not prioritized

Any other relevant information

Not prioritized

Comments

K A IC BC0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

TA 1TA2

Fig. ___ Comparison between TA 1 and TA 2 as regards stage of behavior.

Frequency count

38

The figure evidently shows that both target audiences are in the contemplation stage of behavior change since the levels are above 75 percent. There is so much work to do in terms of , encouraging conversations along the topic on regulation, intrusion in the MPA and the benefits they could get out of a well- protected MPA.

39

C. MPA Governance and Management plan (BROP)

Abstract

Marine Protected Areas are suggested as the most effective tool in fisheries management. They serve as safe haven for fish, invertebrates, and corals to breed and grow to improve fish biomass, abundance, diversity, and improve reef habitats. The Uson Buang Pongco Bonga Fish Sanctuary and Marine Reserve has been established over the last 10 years through the Municipal Ordinance No. 93 Series of 2001. This ordinance describes rules and regulations in the no take zone, penalties per violation, definition of boundaries, and a management body designated to oversee and perform day to day activities. A management plan was drafted and adopted to describe the major strategies and activities that the management will follow. However, over the years, the management performance was rated “PASSING” based on recent MPA rating and is still at level “1” [initiated]. The management body or Management Committee (ManCom)] acknowledged this rating during the organizational development workshops. This can be attributed to the lack of support of department heads and line agencies, poor implementation of action plan and undefined functions of the management body. These resulted to increasing intrusion and weak enforcement continuum [PCRA]. Likewise, KAP revealed that very few individuals knew about the NTZ and its boundaries and while some are knowledgeable, they don’t take any responsibility or action to help manage the MPA. In terms of biophysical status, Uson NTZ has no updated coral reef data to speak of.

In Uson NTZ, poor governance and poor implementation of enforcement continuum calls for improvement through well thought off strategies within the protected area taking into account community participation in the process. The diagnostic process [PCRA, MPA rating, OD]- had been instrumental in identifying such issues thereby used as basis in crafting this MPA Governance and Management Plan to improve governance, enforcement and community buy-in. This MPA-GMP will be carried out by the MPA Management Body [TWG and ManCom] within the timeframe July 2011-July 2012 ( assuming reef data is made available the soonest they could conduct the assessment and will be assessed regularly during meetings. This MPA-GMP will be supported by funding opportunities from various sources such as the Municipal CRM budget, Line Agencies, NGOs, trust fund set up for the Reef and Small Grants from prospective local organizations.

1.Introduction This section should focus on why the plan delves into governance and enforcement and how it fits into the overall campaign strategy

The Philippines ranked first with the most number of MPAs in the world. About 25% of the worlds MPAs are found in the Philippines. However, 15% of these MPAs are expected to be decimated on an annual basis due to poor governance and weak enforcement (Aliňo 1998). In fact, during the Rare-initiated workshop in Cebu, on February 2010, these 2

40

issues surfaced as the most pressing compared to pollution, sedimentation, land-use issues, and climate change. This workshop was attended by scholars and experts in their fields in the Philippines.

Governance refers to the clarity of processes in selecting leaders to manage the MPA and enforcement [a subset of governance] refer to the capacity and availability of logistics to perform such roles that involves the entire continuum such as deterrence, apprehension, case filing and decision. The poor selection of leaders and weak capacity to enforce MPA boundaries and policies will result in the lack of community buy-in to support leaders and projects, unregulated unsustainable fishing activities inside MPAs, and unpopular MPA boundaries and ownership. Subsequently, MPA benefits are not maximized and the community will lose pride over the local MPA.

The Rare Pride Campaign is geared towards changing the behaviour of local fishers and community in order to stop intrusions into the MPA and gain greater community buy-in for improved MPA governance and enforcement. The current plan seeks to strengthen the structures and processes supporting the MPA management and enforcement so that the fishers and community are able to embrace these behaviour changes and take ownership of the MPA and the benefits that it can provide.

2.Objectives and scope1. To improve MPA enforcement processes by November 2011 [i.e. upgraded guardhouse, enforcement,

protocols/plans, intelligence network and communication, logbook system]2. To improve MPA governance system by November 2011 [i.e. regular meeting, increase membership,

documentation, management planning, evaluation, monitoring team]3. Improve MPA effectiveness rating to level 3 [enforced] by June 2012

4.Tools Tools employed included Participatory Coastal Resource Assessment (PCRA) tools; an MPA effectiveness rating workshop and a Technical Working Group (TWG) and Management Committee (ManCom) Organizational Development ( OD) and planning workshops

Three participatory assessment methods were used to assess current status of fisheries, management performance and community knowledge and practices namely Participatory Coastal Resource Assessment (PCRA), TWG and ManCom OD and planning workshops and KAP survey.

1. The PCRA is a critical assessment tool that takes into account the community as the main source of information and data gatherers. It has been widely used in the Philippines since the birth of community-based resource management projects in over 3 decades now. This tool generated a whole suite of focused group discussions [FGDs] not limited to fishery enforcement, resource map, MPA

41

history and etc. The objective of which is to improve community buy-in right at start of project and understand the fishery status in the locality.

2. The MPA effectiveness rating system is a self-assessment tool initiated by CCEF and modified by EcoGov to determine management performance of MPA. It is a system that came about to address the need to improve the overall quality of management-since most MPA face difficulty in enforcement due to poverty and general lack of awareness about the coastal environment. This rating was administered on June 3-4, 2011 with the newly reconstituted MPA management body [TWG and ManCom]. This tool generated conclusions on management status and management focus, collated documents supporting rating, and basis for planning.

3. Organizational development is a conceptual, organization-wide effort to increase an organizations effectiveness and viability through an external facilitator. In our case, we employed OD to assess the local organizations i.e. the TWG and ManCom vis- a vis MPA management on separate dates. These workshops generated action plan focusing on improving organizational performance and strengthening for improve MPA governance and enforcement.

5.MPA profile Table_._: Result of the MPA Enforcement FGDYear Number

of infringement

Types/forms of infringement/gears used

Intruders (from where, who, age group)

Course/s of action taken (apprehension, affidavit writing, litigation, imprisonment)

Forms of incentives/disincentives

Year 1 4 Cyanide and Mostly old 1 apprehension; no further None

42

(After MPA establishment)

compressor fisherfolks; no further details

action taken

Year 2 15 Cyanide and compressor, net

Mostly old fisherfolks; no further details

1 apprehension; no further action taken; patrol boat not functioning

None

Year 3 26 Cyanide and compressor, net

Mostly old fisherfolks; no further details

No further action; marker buoys lost

None

Year 4 31 Cyanide and compressor, net

Mostly old fisherfolks; no further details

1 apprehension; no further action taken; patrol boat and marker buoys issues

None

Year 5 46 Cyanide and compressor, net

Mostly old fisherfolks; no further details

No further action None

Year 6 75 Cyanide and compressor, net

Mostly old fisherfolks; no further details

1 apprehension; no further action taken; dismissed due to lack of technical support (GPS)

None

MPA history, resource use and enforcement Include a digitized resource map, outputs from FGD on enforcement and MPA history. Discuss any results of other PCRA tools-if necessary and

reference the H9 “fisheries profile” where all results from the PCRA are summarized.1. PCRA

a. FGD on enforcementb. FGD on MPA Management History [use formative research results during pre 1st university phase]

History of the Management of Marine Resources

Year (s) Project or event Goals Responsible ImplementingAgency

Outcome Public Perception of

Project or Event

Notes

1999 The villagers of Uson proposed a fish sanctuary

Protect coral reefs

LGU Bgy. Res. No.7 s. 1999

FS only existed on paper

No development to establish FSMR on site

43

2000 Assessment To determine existing coastal resources

FRMP project of BFAR

To include the bgys of Buang and Pongco-Bonga

Polarized community

CRM component PCRA. CO-IEC in 4 bgys.

2001 FSMR Orientation Workshop

To establish FSMR

FRMP, LGU TWG formed 1st TWG July 27, 2001Aug. 7, 2001 planningAug. 22, 2001 Buang Public hearing

2003 Markers installed To indicate the boundaries of no take zone

LGU Initially it served its purpose to determine the boundaries.

At first, it was accepted but later it was destroyed by unidentified fishers.

2007 Sumacore, a Spanish-government funded project operated in Bacacay, Albay

To do CRM BFAR, LGU Livelihood component was realized and so were the funding support for the procurement of buoys

They were well accepted.

2009 Rare Pride Coordination

2010 Buoys were installed To promote No take zone boundary identification

Sumacore and BFAR

Improved patrolling

positive

44

MPA HistoryTable.__ History on MPA enforcement

Year Number of infringement

Types/forms of infringement/gears used

Intruders (from where, who, age group)

Course/s of action taken (apprehension, affidavit writing, litigation, imprisonment)

Forms ofincentives/disincentives

2002(After MPA establishment)

Meron pero hinid nahuli

Year 2003 -do-

Year 2004 -do-

Year 2005 -do-

Year 2006 -do-

Year 2007 4-5 persons Pag bomba Buang, Salvacion30-40

Bacacay PNP Kulong maghapon

Year 2008 7 persons compressor San Roque Tabaco 17-20

Bacacay Police Station No incentive

Year 2009 2-3 persons Pangke sa may sanctuary

Cabasan, Buang, Uson

Turn over Bacacay PNP Wara insentibo, Kinasuhan (naalop) o pinatawad

c. Threats and management challenges of the MPA

Table _._Hard enforcement Soft enforcement Management Body

1. Irregular operation of enforcement

1. Lack maintenance plan for marker buoys

1. Issues among members

2. Lack of understanding

45

team / bantay dagat 2. Use of cyanide and

compressor fishing 3. Dynamite fishing

operations

2. Lack maintenance plan for guardhouse

3. Absence of bulletin board, signboards and marker

4. Lack of communication facilities– handheld radio

5. Lack pumpboat and maintenance plan

on roles and functions3. Some member

discretely allow intruders

4. Attendance during meetings

5. TWG and ManCom are not fully operational due to lack of updated mandate such as EO or SB Resolution

Table . Technical Working Group CompositionName Office and Position Contact ResponsibilitiesPio Caneso MAO LGU Oversees FRMMa. Lourdes Achero AT, LGU Assits the MAOEduardo Castelo MFARMC Chair Policy makingReynaldo Agaser MENRO Designate Mun. FLET

Table _._. Management Committee Composition and FunctionsCommitees Lead person

[Barangay MC] Composition in the Barangay

Functions

Enforcement [patrol]

Manuel Basallote Fishwardens [6], tanod [6]

[1] Logbook maintenance [2] Manage rotation/schedule [3] Ensure that there is enough logistics for the team [4] Coordinate with the local government officials re. surveillance and passing intelligence [5] systematizing patrolling [6] maintain buoys and billboard

46

Biophysical monitoring [corals, fish, invertebrates]

PB Salvacion Buarao

FLET Municipal level led by Rey Agaser

[1] Pagkuha ug datos [tinuig] [2] Pag analyze sa datos [3] Pagsulat sa manila paper aron mabasa sa tanan [4] Pagsulat

IEC Kag. Larry Barrameda

PTA Officers [], Barangay Officials [], TWG

[1] Pagandam ug informasyon [2] Pagpahigayon ug mga edukasyon activities [3] Pag-organize/pagfacilitate sa study tour o bisita

Financing CF Ruby Mendones

(Mayor Tobias Betito Make Trust fund actively support the activities of the ManCom

Management Focus

Relevant indicators

Total Available points

Actual Score per Management Focus

Actual Score divided by Total Available Points

Management Plan 4, 10, 27, 38, 39 9 1 11.1%Management Body 5, 11, 20, 29,32, 40 10 1 10.0%Legal Instrument and support 6, 9, 37, 41 6 5 83.3%Community Participation 1, 3, 8 7 7 100.0%Financing 12, 19, 28, 35, 49 7 3 42.9%IEC 7, 14, 23, 44, 45, 46 12 0 0.0%

Marine Protected Area Effectiveness Rating

47

Enforcement 13, 15, 21, 25, 26, 30, 36 19 7 36.8%Monitoring and evaluation 2, 18, 24, 33, 34, 42, 43 9 2 22.2%Maintenance of infrastructure and site development

16, 17, 22, 31, 47, 48 6 2 33.3%

85

1. TWG and ManCom VM and composition, EO reference

Vision: A premier tourist destination with law-abiding, participative and God-loving citizenry who lived in a ecologically balanced environment and a progressiveand sustainable economy under a shared, transparent and virtuos leadership.

Mission: to promote economic growth and well-being of the people through the effective delivert of basic services, sustainable resourcegeneration and utilization, livelihood opportunities, agri-business and eco-tourism programs.

48

Technical Working Group of the Municipality was reorganized from its 2002 formation. New members included technical staff from DENR Regional Office who were all from the Protected Areas Wildlife and Coastal Zone Office under the CF’s supervisor, Director Felix Mendoza of DENR Regional Office No. 5. During the OD workshop, it was agreed that new members be added in the group those coming from DILG, PNP and MPDC. To date, the TWG have had some five meetings since the Rare Pride Campaign started its mobilization activities. The SB Resolution that will reconstitute the TWG, define its function and set its direction is yet to be approved.

The ManCom was revived through the recent effectivenss rating workshop held iin Uson. Old Mancom members who were also active members of Bgy. FLET took part in the meeting. A pertinent Executive Order would be drafted and submitted to the Municipal Mayor in order to provide legal basis for the ManCom to operate and receive funds from the CRM budget of the MAO.

MonitoringProgress of the BR implementation strategy will be measured against the specific SMART objectives outlined in the action table above.

The overall success of the Governance and Management Plan will be measured through the EcoGov/CCEF MPA effectiveness rating tool.The goal of the Plan, in combination with the Rare pride campaign is to up 1 level higher from present or achieve level 3 “Enforced” by June 2012The monitoring plan of the Pride campaign foresees the monitoring of a number of additional metrics to assess the progress on barrier removal, behavior change and threat reduction:

49

% of members of Mgt Committee belonging to listed categories (local village leaders, influential family members, local women’s associations, private sector representatives, local religious groups, civil service and the youth sector)

% of days per month that there is a record of 24/7 guarding coverage in log book Increase in arrest for year 1 Number of attendees of Barangay Assemblies Monthly activities conducted by enforcement team (outreach, market denial, foot patrols, meetings

with community intelligence partners, etc.) average n of reports of intrusions received per month by the enforcement team N of intrusions from local versus outside fishers Decrease in intrusions from community and adjacent village Decrease in illegal and destructive fishingFor more details on the frequency and methods for data collection please refer to the campaign monitoring plan.

Feasibility and Impact

This action plan underwent expert validation and approval process. The planning workshop was facilitated by an external auditor, Rodolfo Santos, PhD. He has a long history of organizational development facilitation in organizations of various level and scale in the Philippines following a diverse business model. The tool used in planning i.e. MPA Effectiveness Rating is a standard tool in the Philippines to assess management performance of MPAs which has been published by White et al. 2001 and was further enhance by EcoGov Philippine and UP-MSI [MEAT]. The action plans was an output of the 2 day workshop participated by the TWG, consulted to ManCom local fishers, enforcers, LGU department heads who are considered experts in their localities thereby producing a ground truth strategies. Since this will be integrated in the Project Plan where LAP/LCE endorsement is affixed, the same signature will suffice for approval. This action plan will be validated back to the community after a series of iterations during module 3 to serve as the road map to achieve Level 3 status by June 2012.

6.Action Plan [This are the activities that resulted out of your MPA effectiveness rating action planning workshop and TWG and ManCom planning workshops. Timeline should follow the campaign life. You may include other strategies and activities from existing MPA plans and other meetings relevant to governance and enforcement.

50

ACTION PLAN

Critical Areas

Relevant indicators

Smart Objective

Specific Activity

Persons responsible

Timeframe Budget ('000 PhP) Source of

budgetSupport needed Remarks

Management Plan (11.1%)

Management plan adopted and legitimized by the LGU or PAMB [ang plano sa pamamahala ng MPA ay inaprubahan ng SB]

review and revise management plan in order to achieve level 3 sa july 2012.

workshop upang I rebyu ang lumang management plan at I update

MAO Caneso together with members of Management Committee

4th week of July 3

LGU/external/Rare BR Funds

LGU, DENR,DILG  

 

     MPA management plan and/or ordinance reviewed/updated in a participatory process [ang plano sa pamamahala ng MPA ay narebyu at na-update]              

considered sub-activity of Management Plan adopted and legitimized by the LGU or PAMB

 

MPA management plan including budgetary requirements incorporated in the LGU development plan

             

construed as sub activity. If the Mgt Plan has been adopted and legitimized it means this item has been addressed already

management body 10%

Management body formed and functional [nabuo na ang grupo na mamamahala sa MPA ay ito ay kumikilos]

Revive/activate the FSMR mgt. council as indicated in the original (2001) mgt. plan

to include as an activity in the planning workshop

MAO Caneso together with members of Management Committee

4th week of July none

DENR, Rare, LGU LGU

workshop must include planning and commitment building

51

 

     Management body active and supported by legal instrument [ang grupong namamahala sa MPA ay aktibo ay suportado ng legal na instrumento]

               

 

     Management body capable to run the MPA independently [may kakayanan ang grupong namamahala ng MPA na pamahalaan ito nang walang tulong mula sa labas]                

 

Performance of management body regularly monitored and evaluated with community/stakeholder participation [ang takbo ng papamahala sa MPA ay regulara na tinatasa]

integrate the practice of performance mgt. monitoring in the mgt. body

conduct mgt effectiveness rating discussion included in monthly meeting to determine if level 3 is achieved

LGU with the help of MFARMC and Rare

every 3 months none      

 

     Management body capacitated for fund sourcing

set up trust fund for MPA mgt.

prepare mgt plan for submission to signatories (Atty. Regala and Ruby Mendones)

LGU with MFARCM and Rare July-August none      

52

legal instrument

     Formal commitment from the Provincial Council giving MPA stronger political support

obtain formal support from the province esp.financial support

Resolution from Bgy., suported by the Mun. and endorsed to Gov. Salceda

Uson Bgy.- PB Salvacion Buarao Agosto        

Financing

     Budget from LGU or from other sources allocated and is accessible for MPA management [may badyet mula sa LGU para sa pamamahala ng MPA]

clarify budget on MPA what object of expenditure (training? Gasoline? Other services?)

know from Budget office of LGU and at Bgy. Council

Manuel Basallote Jun-11        

   

ensure that MPA mgt cost base of mgt plan is integrated in the AIP.

Mgt. Committee meet with LGU and Bgy. Council

Manuel Basallote Agosto none      

 

     Budget from LGU or from other sources is being allocated and accessed for 2 or more consecutive years [may alokasyong badyet para sa pamamahala ng MPA mula sa LGU sa loob ng 2 taon]

           

 Addressed if the above activity is done  

 

     Environment friendly enterprise and/or fees collected as a sustainable financing strategy

Establish user fee system through SB resolution

Resolution from SB so they can collect user's fee

Ruby Mendones Agosto 2011  none      

53

IEC

     Education program raising awareness about MPA functions and benefits started [may programang pang-edukasyon na napasimulan]

To run a literacy program on sustainable fishing with Alternative Learning Program of Bacacay

Discuss with ALP coordinator and implement the action plan

DEPED, Bgy. Council of Uson

July 2011-July 2012 10

Rare Core fund fr IEC and DENR Counterpart

handouts on Sustainable fishing and other learning kits

ICRMP funds of DENR will be tapped for this

 

     IEC activities conducted [gumugulong na ang mga gawaing pang-edukasyon]

Install sign boards in the Poblacion and in the three bgys covered by the MPA

Design and install signboards ManCOm Aug-11 5

Solicit from Supra Feeds  

signboards will be pretested in the community

 

Education program sustained public awareness and compliance [mayroong pangmatagalang programang pang-edukasyon]

To make sustainable fishing part of the Bacacay curriculum sponsored by Bicol University College of Education

reequest from DepEd

Ruby Mendones

August-October none

counterparting

DENR, BU, DepEd, First Congressional District, AKO Bicol  

 

IEC program on MPAs sustained over the years c/o SM              

 

     Advanced IEC materials developed and disseminated with assistance from partners and/or private sector grants (e.g. video production)

To produce underwater video and plug for educational purposes

Video production Rare

August-Dec. 2011

 5 for copy production

 DENR, Rare. LGU

 UW Footage of MERF  

 

MPA emphasizes on public education and is being used as a study tour site, residents advocate for MPAs                

54

ENFORCEMENT 36.8%

Collaborative patrolling and surveillance conducted by mandated enforcement group and local community volunteers, records maintained and open to everyone [kasama ang komunidad sa pagpapatrolya, may plano sa pagpapatrolya]

Include in the updating of mgt.plan discussion on budget allocation for honorarium

Revive schedule of seaborne patrol, renew deputization through retraining of flsh warden

MAO Caneso kasama ang mga kinatawan ng dating Management Committee August

MAO and BFAR  none    

 

Fishing effectively stopped inside the sanctuary zone [wala nang nangingisda sa loob ng sanktuwaryo]

               

 

Enforcement system fully operational [ang pagpapatrolya ay regular na gumagana]                

M and E

     Regular participatory biophysical monitoring being conducted [ang bayopisikal na monitoring ay regular na ginagawa] involve MFLET

Request to the Mayor for the MFLET to do assessment ; include this in plan updating.

Mr. Rey Agaser, MENRO

July 2011, July 2012

c/o LGU mun. (MENRO and MAO)  none    

 

     Annual participatory biophysical monitoring and timely feedback of results being implemented for 2 consecutive years or more, monitoring team accountable for reliability of results [after 2 years from establishment or the baseline reference up to the evaluation period]                

55

 

     Socio-economic monitoring regularly conducted, monitoring team accountable for timely feedback and reliability of results

               

 

     Evaluation of ecological and socio-economic impacts conducted and feedback mechanisms are in place                

 

Performance M&E linked to an incentive system regularly conducted see program

on M and E              

Maintenance 33.3%

     MPA billboards, boundary markers/anchor buoys maintained [ang mga billboards, markets at boya at napapangalagaan]

Improve maintenance system

ask authority to rehabilitate guardhouse to be paid by Mr. Basallote. (concreting of roof); the Bgy will write the Mayor. Kapt. Buarao Jul-11

c/o Mr. Basallote  none    

 

     Support facilities constructed/added

 

reinstall by having sinkerr;

MAO to request from BFAR wn the year c.o BFAR

 5 for gasoline and food    

     repaint billboard

Ruby Mendones July

c/o Ruby Mendones

 2 for travel of staff  DENR-Rare  

56

Opportunities for funding:1. Municipal- CRM as one of the basic services of the LGUs is allotted annual

appropriation. The activities and facilities shall be funded from the share of LGUs in the proceeds of national taxes and other local revenues and funding support from the national government, its instrumentalities and government-owned or –controlled corporations. (Id., sec. 17(g))

2. External- There is an existing informal agreement that will be forged by the DENR, LGU and an industry called Supra Feeds that will make possible the automatic donation of a peso per sack of feeds sold for the upkeep of the Fish Sanctuary and Marine Reserve. This was initially determined through the Ridge Run for Reef held in March 2011 to raise funds for the MPA. Supra Feeds is an agrichemical company based in Ligao City in the Province of Albay.

3. Others-Support to MPA is one of the priorities of the Department of Agriculture’s Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Coral Triangle Initiative. For extension and training services, the Regional Fisheries and Training Center (RFTC) based in Pili, Camarines Sur provides an opportunity for fishers to be trained on sustainable fishing practices. The Bicol University School of Fisheries in Tabaco, Albay could also be a good source of training and extension services support.

57

D. Monitoring PlanTarget Audience

SMART Objectives Threat Reduction Coservation Reseult

TA 1-friends

K The percentage of fishers who can list any benefits of the NTZ to the local commuity from having an NTZ nearby will increase from 83 percent measured in May 2011 to 100 percent measured in August 2012 ( an increase of 14 pp (Q23B in KAP Survey) A The percentage of fishers who thinks it is easy to report violations of rules and regulations such as intrusion into the NTZ will increase from36 percent measured in May 2011 to 50 percent measured in August 2012 (an increas of 14 pp 34 D in Kap SurveyICThe percentage of the fishers who have not discussed with anyone regarding the consequences of breaking the rule on MPA will decrease from 73 percent measured in May 2011 to 43 percent measured in August 2012 ( a decrease of 30 pp, Q38 on KAP Survey BR The percentage of fishers who strongly agree or agree that rules of the no take zone are regularly enforced so that violators are caught and punished will increase from 67 percent measured in May 2011 to 77 percent mseasured in August 2012, an increase in 10 pp (Q35F in KAP Survey)BC The percentage of fishers who follow rules and regulations often at the UBPBFSMR will increase from 14 percent measured in May 2011 to 30 percent measured in August 2012 ( an increase of 14 pp (Q65 in KAP Survey)BC The percentage of fishers who are most involved in deicision making in the NTZ in the last six months will increase from 30 to 70 percent measured in May 2011 to 70 percent as measured in August 2012, an increase in 40 pp, Q21 in KAP survey.

The percentage of fishers who have seen in the NTZ resource users specializing in the target fish such as aquarium fish, mollusk etc. will decrease from 37 percent measured in May 2011 to 30 percent measured in August 2012 ( a decrease of 7 pp, Q 40 in KAP surveySuggest using the % from subsistence fishers from inside the village and nearby village from same question instead if the acquarium fish,mollusks collectors (see commenst in appendix results section)

The percentage of resident who perceive increase in fish catch as a result of establishing the MPA will increase from 45 percent measured in May 2011 to 55 percent measured in August 2012 ( an increase in 10 pp Q33 in KAP survey)

TA 2-members of organized groups

K Awareness of the role at their level in pursuing plans and programs for the MPA and aware of benefits of MPAA Organized communities are willing to participate in and support meetings and activities related to MPA

IC They will talk among themselves their role in managing local marine resources for the communityBC They will entrust the leadership of UBPBFSMR

58

TA 3-residents K Communities are aware of the benefits and regulations of their NTZ

and know who to report to

A communities have increased level of support in the enforcement of regulations in the MPAcommunities discuss with one another their role in reporting intrusions, violations in support to MPA managementIC The Council is strengthened to enforce the regulation on the MPA and in implementing the Mgt Council PlanBC increase the number of community members who sustain support to NTZ by reporting violations, intrusionsPlease insert the SMART objectives for TA3!

TA 4 K Awareness of the MPA structures, levels of authority and corresponding functions, duties and responsibilities in achieving goals for the MPA

A Performs their role in providing CRM services in the 36 coastal barangays including MPA management in Uson Buang Pongco Bonga

IC Key LGU employees will discuss with each other their role to further strengthen the MPA structure

E. ENDORSEMENT OF THIS PLANThis plan has been shared with and endorsed by the Technical Working Committee and Management Committee of the Uson MPA It was also shared with key stakeholders such as fishers, residents and organized groups as well as with those interviewed during the directed conversations. Throughout the planning process new ideas and recommendations have been incorporated and revisions made, to the extent that this plan has now been approved by all critical partners including the Mayor of Bacacay, the LAP supervisor and Rare. The

59

plan will be posted on RarePlanet, which will continue to be used for information sharing and periodic updates: www.rareplanet.org (insert link to your campaign milestones page).

This plan has been read and approved by

HON. TOBIAS C. BETITOMunicipal Mayor, BacacayJuly 15, 2011

FELIX C. MENDOZARegional Technical Director, PAWCZMS DENR VJuly 15, 2011

60

F.References and AcknowledgementsReferencesInsert a list of all literature consulted & referenced in the planExample: Margoluis, R. A. & Salafsky N. (1998) Measures of Success, Island Press, Washington DC. Jenks B. (2001) An island under threat;; 96pp Searon Press

AcknowledgementsI am most grateful to my supervisors, Joselin Marcus Fragada and Felix Mendoza, Regional Exceutive Director and Regional Technical Director of DENR V, respectively for the support they have been generously extending to me and to my site;

I am also forever grateful to Rare’s Survey Pro instructor, Analisa Bianchessi, for enabling me to comprehend Survey Pro and the many wonders it offers; She has been very patient every step of the way.until the results of the survey took an amazing shape, that of the audience persona.

To my PPM/ Advisor Ms. Crissy Canlas for all the fine tunings and the journey with PEP2. Thanks a whole lot, Crissy! Big thanks to Pablo Rojas for the insights on governance and enforcement as regards reef protection:; Fel Cadiz for the mentoring; Dr. Ronet Santos for the OD inputs and the excel tutotials;Glocel for the smiles, warmth, tender loving support we thought we can only get from her; for Stuart Green-for the greatest challenge ever posed-and his sense of sacrifice to keep PEP2 well on its way to achieving its goals; Brooke Sadowsky for the pleasure of her company in Boljoon as our guest and mentor on qualitative research; to PEP2 team in America-Amy, Martha, Dale, Steve, Brett, Paul Butler and the Rare Conseration brains-collective. Truly, you are all Rare!

To my colleagues in DENR and my reef ranger clique whose contributions to this plan were invaluable indeed. Special thanks to Cathy, Ate Dessa, Bel, Sheryll, Vince, Venal, Cherry, Dag, Tian, Marybeth, and Arman (the survey questionnaire!) for this journey;

Thank you Bicol University Dean Noemi Ibo, Dr. Rose Frias, Prof Alex De Guzman and Prof. Valenzuela with their AB Political Science students who took the challenge and made sure we have the KAP survey result at hand in a day. You are all amazingly great!!!

My parents: Mama and Papa; Mama Yaying and Papa Melio; my aunts: Maye, Manen,my niece Ella for the SurveyPro support she gave and the joy of working together under pressure; Manoy Basil, Manay, Jeff, May, and Ia for the happy moments; Nette, Mother Trinidad, Ate Honor and Ate Fening for the unceasing prayers,

My friends: Malou and Eric Parlade for the friendship made to last a lifetime; and

Julius whose company and idea of inner peace have bridged many loose ends including my schedules and priorities.

61

G.APPENDICES1.Fisheries profile

Refer to fisheries profile template for this, insert only those sections that you have done through your PCRA

Table 1.Problem Tree of Uson based on focus group discussion at the PCRA 2011

62

Fisheries demographics

Details Number

Number of fishermen (full time) in Uson 44

Number of fishermen (part time) 30

Number of fishers (women) 5

Number of fishers (children) 15

Number of gleaners 20

Number of boats motorized 25

Number of non-motorized boats 17

Ave. number of individuals in a motorized boat/trip

3-5

Ave. number of individuals in a non-motorized boat/trip

3

Other forms of livelihood /month Mat making, carpentry,

Lean months for fishing/why Dec to February

Peak months for fishing/why March, April, May

MPA History

63

Year Uses of Core Zone Uses Buffer Zone

Before establishment Fishing ground

1 year after establishment

No take zone Fishing and navigation

2 years after establishment

No take zone -do-

3 years after establishment

No take zone -do-

Gear type

Expenses per trip (hook, nylon, net, bait)

Number of kilos caught per trip

Number of kilos sold

Price per kilo

Net income

Types of expense from sales

Number of kilos to take home

Pangjke 5k net, 2-3 persons

5-15 kgs

4 kgs 80/kg Rice, sugar

coffee

Banwit

Bentol 40 per kilo na gastos sa bait o pain (Paon)

semilya 50 pcs

Pang-eskwela

baklad ugog) 2

kilosFishpond 399K Sugpo,

bangus3x harvest/yr,

100 kilos bangusSugpo 24K

Hati angdelihensya

pangkain 1-5 kilos

64

Resource use and issues codingUse Code Issue CodeHuman settlement Yes Poisonous substances NonePower station Non

eCommercial fishing None

Chapel Yes Mangrove harvesting YesSchools Yes Reclamation NoneAgricultural land Yes Garbage disposal YesHook and line fishing Yes Inadequate IEC YesSpear fishing Yes Habitat destruction YesBottom set gill nets Yes Lack of law enforcement YesFish landing area Yes Poaching YesDocking area Yes Sedimentation NoneNavigational route Yes River discharges noneMultipurpose hall Yes Gleaning inside MPA no

Gleaning Yes Fishing inside MPA yesResorts YesFish corral YesFish traps YesFish ponds YesGuardhouse yes

65

Year Number of infringement

Types/forms of infringement/gears used

Intruders (from where, who, age group)

Course/s of action taken (apprehension, affidavit writing, litigation, imprisonment)

Forms of incentives/disincentives

2002(After MPA establishment)

There were violation but wee not apprehended

Year 2003 -do-

66

Year 2004 -do-

Year 2005 -do-

Year 2006 -do-

Year 2007 4-5 persons Dynamite fishing Buang, Salvacion30-40

Bacacay PNP Put to jail the whole day

Year 2008 7 persons compressor San Roque Tabaco 17-20 Bacacay Police Station No incentive

Year 2009 2-3 persons Pangke sa may sanctuary

Cabasan, Buang, Uson

Turn over Bacacay PNP

Wara insentibo, Kinasuhan (naalop) o pinatawad

Trend Diagram

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 20100

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fishcatch (kg)

67

Fig. __ Amount of fish catch in kilograms over time. (PCRA, 2011 Uson)

The participants to the recent PCRA conducted plotted this downward trend of fish catch noted that the high volume of fish catch in the early 70s was also due to the presence of illegal fishing methods such as use of dynsmite that was then unregulated. They have noted the downward decline of fish catch through time especially in recent years.

Survey Questionnaire Republic of the Philippines

Province of Albay MUNICIPALITY OF BACACAY

Uson Buang Pongco Bonga Fish Sanctuary and Marine Reserve

Pride English Program 2 (Philippines)Baseline Survey (2010) and Post-campaign Survey (2012)

Hello, ako po si _________________________________ estudyante kan Bicol University. Nagigigbo pa kami ki survey ngunyan manongod sa kapalibutan asin mga tawo digdi saindong barangay. Salamat po sa imong pakisumaro sa survey na ini sa paagi ki pagsimbag sa mga kahapotan. Anu man po na impormasyon na itatao nindo pati ngaran dae po ipapaaram sa iba. An mga kasimbagan po nindo makatabang na marhay sa pagplano ki masurunod na mga aktitbidad sa barangay na ini.

Dapat po at least 15 years old ka para maka participate sa survey na ini.

KAP Survey #: __________

Year

68

An participasyon mo sa survey na ini boluntaryo. Pwede po na dae magsimbag sa kahapotan na sa iling mo dae moa ram an kasimbagan. Pero importante an mga pananaw mo samuya kaya laom mi na mapartisipar ka. Pwede po kita magpoon na kan interview?

Respondent agrees to be interviewed [ ] Yes (If no, keep tally on separate sheet of paper)

SECTION 1 - BACKGROUND INFORMATION FILLED IN PRIOR TO THE INTERVIEW WITHOUT ASKING THE RESPONDENTBarangay:[ ] Uson [ ] Buang [ ] Pongco Bonga Date (month/day/year): ___________________

Survey period:[ ] Pre campaign - Baseline (Feb 2011) [ ] Post-campaign (June 2012)

Gender of respondent: [ ] Male [ ] FemaleTarget Audience[ ] TA1 - Fishermen (random)[ ] TA2 – Organized groups-MFARMC, BFARMC, BDC[ ] TA3 – Uson Residents (random)

SECTION 2 - SOCIOECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC QUESTIONS"To begin, I would like to ask you some questions about yourself"

(1) Which of the following statements best describes you [choose only one]: (Arin ka po difdi sa mga binaggit? Magpili ka po ki saro) - You are a fisher that fished at least 1 time in the past month near the Uson Buang Pongco Bonga FSMR (UBPBFSMR), - You are a fisher that fished at least 1 time in the past month in the (UBPBFSMR), - You are a gleaner that gleaned at least 1 time in the past month near the (UBPBFSMR), - You are a gleaner that gleaner at least 1 time in the past month in the (UBPBFSMR), - You are a Community Folk from Barangay Uson- You are a Fisher from neighboring Barangay that fished at least 1 time in the past year near the (UBPBFSMR),- You are a Fisher from neighboring Barangay that gleaned at least 1 time in the past year near the (UBPBFSMR)- You are a member of the organized groups- None of the above

(2) Where do you live in relation to the UBPBFSMR? Do you live inside of Uson, In Buang, in Pongco Bonga, or somewhere else? [choose only one] (Sain ka po naka istar, sa mismong Uson, Sa Buang o sa Pongco Bonga? O sa luwas kan mga binggit na Barangay?Saro po an pilion)

[ ] I live in Uson (Nakaistar sa Brgy. Uson)[ ] I do not live in Uson but I live in Bacacay (Bako sa Uson pero taga Bacacay)[ ] Other (iba pa) ___________

69

(3) How old were you at your last birthday? (Pira an edad mo sa nag aging compleanyo mo?)[ ] 14 or younger [ ] 15 to 19 [ ] 20 to 24 [ ] 25 to 29 [ ] 30 to 34 [ ] 35 to 39[ ] 40 to 44 [ ] 45 to 49 [ ] 50 to 54 [ ] 55 or older

(4) What is the highest level of education you attained? (Ano po an inabot mo sa pag iskwela, magpili po ki saro sana)[ ] No school completed (dae naka-eskuwela)[ ] Some or all primary completed (Grade 1 antos Grade 3)[ ] Some or all intermediate school completed (Grade 4 antos sa pagka kumpleto sa Elementarya)[ ] Some or all secondary completed (Nakatungtung o nakatapos ki High school) [ ] Some or full college/university completed (Nakatungtong o nakatapos sa kolehiyo)[ ] Some or full vocational course (Nakatapos ki vocational course)[ ] Some or all of religious school/college completed (Nakatungtong o nakatapos ki pageswela sa relihion)[ ] Refused to answer (Habo magsimbag)

(5) If you belong to a religion/sect, please tell me which religion/sect. [choose one only] (Ano an sa imong Reliheyo o sekta, magpil ki saro)

[ ] Roman Catholic [ ] Iglesia Filipina Indipendiente (IFI) [ ] Iglesia Ni Kristo[ ] Church of Latter Day Saints [ ] Born Again [ ] Muslim/Islam[ ] Protestant [ ] Seventh Day Adventist [ ] Jehovah's Witness[ ] Baptist [ ] Local/traditional [ ] Refuses to answer[ ] None [ ] Other ________________

(6) What is your primary occupation or sector in which you work? [choose one only] (Ano po an sa imong pinaka hanapbuhay?)

[ ] Agriculture [ ] Fishing [ ] Gleaning (pagkua ki mga shells [ ] Small business (nagatinda) [ ] Office work [ ] Food preparation or restaurant [ ] Professional (Lawyer, Health care provider, Teacher)[ ] Artisan (crafts) [ ] housework [ ] student[ ] Not currently employed [ ] other private company [ ] fish vending[ ] non-governmental organization [ ] self employed[ ] government (local) [ ] government [ ] Other ________________ [ ] N/A

(7) What is your secondary occupation or sector in which you work? [choose one only] (Ano man ang imong ikaduwa na hanapbuhay o sideline?)[ ] Agriculture [ ] Fishing [ ] Gleaning (pagkua ki mga shells [ ] Small business (nagatinda) [ ] Office work [ ] Food preparation or restaurant [ ] Professional (Lawyer, Health care provider, Teacher)[ ] Artisan (crafts) [ ] housework [ ] student[ ] Not currently employed [ ] other private company [ ] fish vending

70

[ ] non-governmental organization [ ] self employed[ ] government (local) [ ] government [ ] Other ________________ [ ] N/A

(8) How many people live in your household? (Pira po kamo gabos na naka istar sa harong?) [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5 [ ] 6 [ ] 7 [ ] 8 [ ] 9 [ ] 10 [ ] More than 10

(9) In the past calendar year, from January to December, what is your best estimate of the total income earned by all family members that currently live in the same home with you. Again, this information will not be shared with anyone. (If can give daily to monthly just compute) (Pira man an suma total na ganansya kan bilog na pamilya sa laog kan naka aging taon)

[ ] Below 30,000 Pesos [ ] Between 30,000 and 50,000[ ] Between 50,001 and 75,000 [ ] Between 75,001 and 100,000[ ] Greater than 100,000 Pesos [ ] Not sure [ ] Refused to answer

(10) What percentage of this annual income comes from fishing? (Pirang porsiyento kaini an hali sa pagdagat?)[ ] 0% [ ] 1 - 20% [ ] 21 - 40% [ ] 41 - 60% [ ] 61 - 80% [ ] 81 - 100%

(11) What percentage of this annual income comes from gleaning? (Pirang porsiyento kaini an hali sa pagsira sa tampi?)[ ] 0% [ ] 1 - 20% [ ] 21 - 40% [ ] 41 - 60% [ ] 61 - 80% [ ] 81 - 100%

(12) If Fishing, what gears do you use? (kung pagdagat, ano ang saimong gamit sa panagat)[ ] Hikot [ ] Fish trap (bobo)[ ] Hook & Line (banwit) [ ] Spear fishing (pana) [ ] Other ________________

SECTION 3 - TRUSTED SOURCES OF INFORMATION & MEDIA ACCESS/EXPOSURE

(13) People hear information about the environment from many different sources. I am going to read you a list of sources from which you might hear information about the environment, and I would like you to tell me whether you would find that source "Most trustworthy [MT], Very trustworthy [VT], Somewhat trustworthy [ST], or Not trustworthy [NT], Not sure/Don't know (NS/DK) (Dakol an impormasyon manongod sa kapalibutan. Arin sa mga ini an sa hiling mo makosog an pagtobod mo-MT, minatobod ka -VT, pwedeng tobodan-ST, dae pwede tobodan -NT, wara ka masabi-NS/DK)

a. Person on the radio [ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DKb. Person on television [ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DKc. Report in newspaper or magazine [ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DKd. Law enforcement official [ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DKe. National government environment officials-

DENR [ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DK

f. Local government environment officials [ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DK

71

g. Local community leaders [ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DKh. Religious leaders [ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DKi. Friends or family members [ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DKj. Teachers [ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DKk. Scientist [ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DKl. Information on poster or billboard [ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DKm. Information in printed booklet [ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DKn. Information from puppet show [ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DKo. Information from public meeting [ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DKp. Conservation volunteer [ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DKq. Kuya Kim / Richard Gutierrez [ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DKr. NGO environmental officials [ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DKs. Bantay dagat [ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DKt. Lideres kan UBPBFSMR [ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DKu. Barangay captain [ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DKv. Information received sa text sa cellphone [ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DK

w. Who would you trust the most (from list above or other) if they told you something about the environment? (Sisay sa mga ini an pinaka pigatobodan mo kun may tataramon sya sa kapalibotan?)

[ ] person on radio [ ] person on television[ ] report in newspaper/magazine [ ] law enforcement official[ ] national government environment official [ ] local government environment official[ ] local community leaders [ ] religious leaders[ ] friends or family members [ ] teachers[ ] information on poster/billboard [ ] information in printed booklet[ ] information from puppet show [ ] information from public meeting or festival[ ] conservation group volunteer [ ] Celebrity/Soap Star/ Entertainer[ ] Non-government environmental officials [ ] Barangay captain[ ] UBPBFSMR lider [ ] Bantay dagat[ ] Other ________________ [ ] N/A

(14) In the past month, would you say that you usually listened to the radio never, up to 3 days per week, 4 to 6 days per week, or 7 days per week. (Pirang beses ka ngadangog ki radio sa laog ki sarong semana?)

[ ] Never [ ] Up to 3 days per week [ ] 4 to 6 days per week [ ] 7 days per week

72

A) When you listen to the radio, which radio stations are your most preferred stations? (Anong istasyon an pinaka piga danggog mo)

[ ] DZGB Legazpi [ ] Magic Radio [ ] DZRC Legazpi [ ] OK FM [ ] Fox FM Legazpi[ ] Bombo Radyo Legazpi [ ] One Radio Tabaco [ ] No favorite station[ ] Don't know [ ] Don't listen to the radio [ ] Other _______________

B) When you listen to the radio, what is your favorite type of program that you like to listen to? (Anong klase sa mga programa ang piga dangog mo, magpili ka ki saro programa)

[ ] Local music [ ] International music [ ] News [ ] Sports[ ] Talk shows [ ] Dramas [ ] Religious [ ] No favorite[ ] Don't listen to radio [ ] Other ________________

C) When you listen to the radio, Monday to Friday, what are the most likely times for you to listen to the radio? (Ano na oras ka nagadangog ki radio pwede magpli antos 2 na simbag)

[ ] Before 6:00 a.m. [ ] 6:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. [ ] 10:01 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.[ ] 2:01 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. [ ] 6:01 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. [ ] After 10:00 p.m.[ ] No particular time [ ] Off and on all day [ ] Don't know[ ] Don't watch/listen

D) When you listen to the radio, Saturday and Sunday, what are the most likely times for you to listen to the radio? (Ano na mga oras ka nagadangog sa radio sa aldaw na Sabado asin Domingo)

[ ] Before 6:00 a.m. [ ] 6:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. [ ] 10:01 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.[ ] 2:01 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. [ ] 6:01 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. [ ] After 10:00 p.m.[ ] No particular time [ ] Off and on all day [ ] Don't know[ ] Don't watch/listen

(15) In the past month, would you say that you usually read a newspaper or magazine never, up to 3 days per week, 4 to 6 days per week or 7 days per week? (Nagabasa ka ba ki mga magazine o mga basahon, pira na beses sa laog ki sarong semana)

[ ] Never [ ] Up to 3 days per week [ ] 4 to 6 days per week [ ] 7 days per week

A) Which newspaper or magazine do you usually read. Please tell me up to three publications that you read most often. (Ano na klase ki babasahon an tiga basa mo)[ ] Philippine Daily Inquirer [ ] Manila Bulletin [ ] MayonTimes[ ] Dyaryo Veritas [ ] Bicol Reporter [ ] Philippine Star [ ] No favorite [ ] Don't know [ ] Don't read [ ] Other _______________

(16) I am going to list some different types of media programs, and I would like you to tell me how much you like each program type. Do you like it the most (MOST), like it a lot (ALOT), like it a little (LITTLE), or not like it? (Arin na mga programa an sa imong paborito. Sa simbag mop o paki taram sakuya kun moyahun mong maray, moya, moya ki diit o habo mo)

73

a. Tagalog Love Melodies [ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not likedb. Classic Oldies Music [ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not likedc. Traditional Music [ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not likedd. Local news [ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not likede. National news [ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not likedf. International news [ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not likedg. Sports [ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not likedh. Religious programs [ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not likedi. Talk show programs [ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not likedj. Dramas [ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not likedk. Comedy [ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not likedl. Puppet shows [ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not likedm. Locally-produced video [ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not likedn. What other types of media programs do you like to watch, listen to, or read about? (Ano pa an programa na muyamo

dangogon, hilingon o basahon apwera kan mga binanggit?_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SECTION 4 - ASSIGN RESPONDENT TO STAGE-OF-BEHAVIOR-CHANGE

(17) Do you glean or fish or both? (choose on only) Nagasira ka sa tampi o nagadagat ka[ ] yes, I glean (nagakua sa tampi) [ ] yes, I fish (Managat) [ ] yes, I glean and fish[ ] no I don't glean and don't fish [ ] N/A

(18) (If respondent said no I don't fish and I don't glean in previous question then don't ask question and select "behavior is not relevant to this respondent")

I am going to read you a list of 6 statements about whether or not you have gone fishing or gleaning in the UBPBFSMR in the past 6 months. I want you to listen to all 6 statements, then tell me which one statement best represents you: Arin sa mga minasunod an mina representar saimo.

[ ] I have never considered stopping fishing/gleaning in the UBPBFSMR (wala ako plano na magtonong sa pagsira sa UBPBFSMR)[ ] I have considered stopping fishing/gleaning in the UBPBFSMR but do not want to stop doing so (nagga isip na ako magpondo

sa pagsira sa UBPBFSMR)[ ] I intend to stop fishing/gleaning in the UBPBFSMR in the next 6 months but have not done so yet (Mapondo na ako mag sira sa

UBPBFSMR sa masunod na anom na bulan)

74

[ ] I have talked to someone about stopping fishing/gleaning in the SPMS in the past 6 months but have not stopped yet (nakastorya ako na magpondo na magsira sa UBPBFSMR sa naka aging bulan bulan ugaring padagos pa ako na nagasira duman)

[ ] I have only gone fishing/gleaning in the UBPBFSMR a few times in the past 6 months (nakapanagat ako sa UBPBFSMR minsan sana sa laog ki anom na bulan)

[ ] I have not fished/gleaned in the UBPBFSMR in the past 6 months (dae ako nakapagsira sa UBPBFSMR sa naka aging anom na bulan)

[ ] Behavior is not relevant for this respondent.(Bako aplikable an arin man digdi sa respondent)

(19) I am going to read you a list of 6 statements about following regulations of the UBPBFSMR I would like you to listen to all 6 statements, then tell me which one statement best represents you: (basahan ta ka ki anom ka linya manongod sa regulasyon sa UBPBFSMR, arin sa mga ini an mina representar saimo)

[ ] I have never considered following the regulations of the UBPBFSMR (dae ko tiga isip na magsunos sa mga regulasyon sa UBPBFSMR)

[ ] I have considered following the regulations of the UBPBFSMR but don't want to do so (aram ko an mga regulasyon sa UBPBFSMR pero wara ako plano na magsunod kaini)

[ ] I intend to follow the regulations of the UBPBFSMR in the next 6 months. (plano ko na magsuond sa regulasyon sa maabot na anom na bulan)

[ ] I have talked to someone about following the regulations of the UBPBFSMR in the past 6 months. (nakastorya na ko sa iba manongod sa pagsunod sa regulasyon sa UBPBFSMR sa naka aging anom ka bulan)

[ ] I often follow the regulations of the UBPBFSMR but not at all times. (Nagasunod ako sa regulasyon sa UBPBFSMR pero bako sa sa gabos na panahon)

[ ] I have always followed the regulations of the UBPBFSMR in the past 6 months (Nagasunod ako sa regulasyon sa UBPBFSMR san aka aging anom ba bulan)

[ ] Behavior not relevant to this respondent

(20) I am going to read you a list of 6 statements about whether or not you have been involved in governance and management of the UBPBFSMR in the past 6 months. I want you to listen to all 6 statements, then tell me which one statement best represents you: Arin sa mga minasunod an mina representar saimo.

[ ] I have never considered attending meetings of the UBPBFSMR Management (Dae ako naga isisp na mag atendir sa mga pagtiripon manongod sa UBPBFSMR Management)

[ ] I have considered attending meetings of the UBPBFSMR Management, but don't want to do it (Tiga isip ko mag atendir sa meetings manongod sa UBPBFSMR pero habo ko gibohon)

[ ] I intend to attend meetings of the UBPBFSMR Management in the next 6 months but have not done so yet (Igwa ako ki intenston na mag atendir sa UBPBFSMR meeting sa masunod na anom na bulan pero dae ko pa nagibo ini)

[ ] I have talked to someone about attending meetings of the UBPBFSMR Management in the last 6 months (May nakahuron na ako manongod sa pag atendir ki meeting manongod sa UBPBFSMR sa maabot na anom na bulan)

[ ] I have attended at least 1 meetings of the UBPBFSMR Management in the last 6 months (May na atendiran na ako ki meeting kan UBPBFSMR management sa uminaging anom na bulan)

75

[ ] I have attended at least 6 meetings of the UBPBFSMR Management in the last 6 months (May na atendiran na ako ki anom na meeting kan UBPBFSMR management sa uminaging anom na bulan)

[ ] Behavior is not relevant for this respondent

(21) I am going to read you a list of 6 statements about whether or not you have reported any intrusions into the UBPBFSMR to the enforcement team in the past 6 months. I want you to listen to all 6 statements, then tell me which one statement best represents you:

[ ] I have never considered reporting any intrusions in the SPMS (Dae ako naga isisp na mag report ki anu man na pagbalga manongod sa lei kan UBPBFSMR Management)

[ ] I have considered reporting any intrusions in the SPMS, but don't want to do it (Tiga isip ko na mag Report ki pagbalga manongod sa lei kan UBPBFSMR Management

[ ] I intend to report any intrusions in the UBPBFSMR in the next 6 months but have not done so yet May intensyon ako na magreport ki pag balgar sa lei kan UBPBFSMR sa masuond na anom na bulan pero dae ko pa

nagigibo)[ ] I have talked to someone about reporting any intrusions into the UBPBFSMR in the last 6 months but have not reported any yet.

May nakahoron na ako manongod sa pag report ki anuman na bagbalgar kan lei sa UBPBFSMR sa nag aging anom na bulan pero dae pa ako nag report.

[ ] I have reported one intrusion in the UBPBFSMR to the enforcement team in the last 6 months (Nag report na ako ki saro na pagbalga sa UBPBFSMR sa uminaging anom na bulan.

[ ] I have reported two or more intrusions in the UBPBFSMR to the enforcement team in the last 6 months (Nag report na ako ki duwa o labi pa sa duwa kan mga pagbalgar sa UBPBFSMR sa naga pasunod kan lei san aka aging anom na bulan.

[ ] Behavior is not relevant for this respondent A

SECTION 5 - ESTABLISH BASELINES FOR AND MEASURE CHANGE IN KNOWLEDGE SMART OBJECTIVESNow, I would like to ask you some questions about the local environment and wildlife that live in this area.

(22) Please state below whether you believe each regulation is either true or false as a UBPBFSMR Rules/Policies: Simbagon po kun tama, sala o dae sigurado an minasunod

a. Only members of the UBPSFSMR can harvest fish inside the UBPBFSMR. An miyembro sana an pwede mag sira sa laog kan UBPBFSMR

[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

b. No-one can fish or collect shells inside UBPBFSMR Warang iba an pwede mag sira o mag kua maski shells sa laog kan UBPBFSMR.

[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

c. Only Hook and Line fishing is allowed inside the UBPSFSMR.Banwit sana an pwedeng klase nin pagsira sa laog kan UBPBFSMR.

[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

d. Anyone can glean inside UBPBFSMR, just fishing is not allowedPwede magkua ki mga shells, balat sa UBPBFSMR pwera

[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

76

kan pagsira na iyo an bawal. e. It is legal to use cyanide and dynamite to catch fish in the buffer

zone around UBPBFSMR Legal an paggamit ki cyanide ngani makadakop sa luwas kan UBPBFSMR.

[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

f. The elected officials are allowed to take fish from the UBPBFSMR when they visit An mga elehidong opisyal pwede tugutan na magsira sa UBPBFSMR

[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

g. After five years of no fishing being allowed, the UBPBFSMR canh. be harvested again. Maka agi an limang taon na bawal an

pagsira sa laog kan sanktwaryo, an mga sira sa UBPBFSMR pwede na giraray na dakopon digdi.

[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

(23) COHORT QUESTION - Some of the questions I am going to ask you are about the no-take zone that is going to be or has been created in your local area. A no-take zone is a clearly identified area Zone (NTZ)

(24)A) COHORT QUESTION - Are there any benefits to the local community from having a no take zone nearby? (If respondent

answers YES then please also ask next question) [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

B) COHORT QUESTION – (Ask only of those who said yes to previous question) What local community benefits are there from having the no take zone nearby? You can tell me up to 3 that you know. (Do NOT read out answers but tick as appropriate or add to other) [ ] more fish[ ] area for fish to reproduce[ ] bigger fish [ ] bigger or better coral/habitat for fish[ ] more fertile fish [ ] bank of the sea/food security [ ] better regulation/management of fishing activities [ ] no more destructive fishing in that area[ ] community ownership [ ] new skills [ ] better/new access to tourism [ ] better community cohesion [ ] Other _______________________________ [ ] N/A

(25) COHORT QUESTION - I am going to read you a list of people, and I would like you to tell me for each one how much you believe they have been involved during the past 6 months in important management decisions, such as in determining the size and location of your local no-take fishing area

77

a. National Government officials [ ] Regularly [ ] Occasionally [ ] Never [ ] NS/DKb. Local Government officials [ ] Regularly [ ] Occasionally [ ] Never [ ] NS/DKc. Scientists and/or fisheries experts [ ] Regularly [ ] Occasionally [ ] Never [ ] NS/DKd. Local leaders [ ] Regularly [ ] Occasionally [ ] Never [ ] NS/DKe. Local fishers [ ] Regularly [ ] Occasionally [ ] Never [ ] NS/DK

(26) COHORT QUESTION - I am going to read you a list of people, and I would like you to tell me for each one how much you believe that during the past 6 months they have been able to determine the regulations for your local no-take fishing area. Were these individuals the most important decision makers, involved but not the decision makers, or not involved in decision-making?

a. National Government officials [ ] Most involved [ ] Involved [ ] Not involved [ ] NS/DKb. Local Government officials [ ] Most involved [ ] Involved [ ] Not involved [ ] NS/DKc. Scientists and/or fisheries experts [ ] Most involved [ ] Involved [ ] Not involved [ ] NS/DKd. Local leaders [ ] Most involved [ ] Involved [ ] Not involved [ ] NS/DKe. Local fishers [ ] Most involved [ ] Involved [ ] Not involved [ ] NS/DK

SECTION 6 - ESTABLISH BASELINES FOR AND MEASURE CHANGE IN ATTITUDE SMART OBJECTIVES

(27) Please state below whether you agree or disagree with the following statements on the possible impacts on the local community if the SPMS Rules/Policies are not strictly observed by fishers: SA for Strongly Agree, A for Agree, D for Disagree, and SD for Strongly Disagree

a. Fish will be scared out of the sanctuary and into the fishing nets ( [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SDb. Fish species will continue to decline in number or disappear [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SDc. Illegal fishers from outside will be encouraged to come in and blast fish

within the SPMS [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD

d. The corals begin to die when the fish are taken away [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SDe. The local community will be poorer and less united [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SDf. We will catch more fish [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD

(28) Please state below whether you agree or disagree with the following statements associated with poor governance of the UBPBFSMR

a. Only a few people are involved with the UBPBFMSR management [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD

78

b. No-one knows who is managing the UBPBFSMR [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SDc. Local Residents know who and when guarding takes place and so are

able to enter UBPBFSMR when the guards are not there ( [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD

d. "Outsiders" say that there is more fish, but we don't see any [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SDe. There is no patrol boat to chase after the illegal fishers, so the illegal

fishers just come and ignore the rules knowing they won't be caught [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SDf. Only men are involved in the UBPBFSMR, so the interests and

concerns of women or youth are being ignored [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SDg. The UBPBFSMR regulations need to be followed by all people who go

into the sanctuary [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD

(29) What is your level of support for increasing the enforcement of the regulations of the UBPBFSMR [ ] Strongly do not support the increase in enforcement

[ ] Do not support the increase in enforcement [ ] Support the increase in enforcement [ ] Strongly support the increase in enforcement[ ] Unsure

(30) What do you think of the size of the UBPBFSMR [ ] Too Big [ ] Too Small

[ ] Just the right size [ ] Unsure [ ] N/A

(31) What do you think of the location of the UBPBFSMR [ ] In the right place (saktong lugar) [ ] In the wrong place (salang lugar)

[ ] Unsure (di sigurado) [ ] N/A

(32) Who should primarily enforce the rules and regulations of the UBPBFSMR [ ] Coastguard [ ] Fishers/Gleaners

[ ] Bantay dagat (licensed enforcers) [ ] National Police[ ] Local village officials [ ] Other ________________

(33) Who would you trust most to head and govern the UBPBFSMR Management Committee [ ] Community members [ ] Fishers/Gleaners

[ ] Local village officials [ ] Local government officials[ ] Other ________________

(34) Has your catch increased, decreased or stayed the same as a result of the UBPBFSMR (If the person does not fish or glean mark as NA)

[ ] Decreased (nagbawas) [ ] Increased (nagdakol) [ ] Stayed the Same (parehas) [ ] N/A

79

(35) CUSTOMIZE according to BC and BR: I am going to read to you a number of activities, and I would like you to tell me whether you would find it easy or difficult for you to do that

A) Attend at least 6 meetings of the UBPBFSMR Management Committee in 12 months ( [ ] Easy (madali) [ ] Difficult (dipisil) [ ] Not sure (di sigurado) [ ] Not applicable

B) Run a UBPBFSMR Committee every month (mapadalagan an komitiba sa UBPBFSMR kada bulan)[ ] Easy (madali) [ ] Difficult (dipisil) [ ] Not sure (di sigurado) [ ] Not applicable

C) Participate in other UBPBFSMR related activities such as public consultations and coastal clean-ups (ma-iba kung igwa aktibidad na may kinaaraman sa UBPBFSMR kaiba an meeting, coastal clean-ups, etc)[ ] Easy (madali) [ ] Difficult (dipisil) [ ] Not sure (di sigurado) [ ] Not applicable

D) Report violations of rules and regulations such as intrusions into UBPBFSMR (masumbong kung igwa makita na biolasyon siring kan pagsira sa laog kan UBPBFSMR)

[ ] Easy (madali) [ ] Difficult (dipisil) [ ] Not sure (di sigurado) [ ] Not applicable (36) COHORT QUESTION - I am going to read you a number of statements about the management of the local no take zone. For

each statement, I would like you to tell me if you strongly agree (SA), agree (A), disagree (D), or strongly disagree (SD) with it. a. There is a clear plan for how the no take zone will be managed [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DKb. Local village fishers regularly participate in management decisions

of the no take zone) [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK

c. Local people know boundaries of the no take zone [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DKd. There was not enough planning done before the no take zone was

established [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK

e. There is enough money and other resources to fully manage and enforce the rules of the no take zone [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK

f. The rules of the no take zone are regularly enforced so that violators are caught and punished [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK

g. The rules of the no take zone are unclear and local fishers don't understand them [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK

h. The rules of the no take zone are designed more to protect the fish than to help the fishers [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK

i. The infrastructure, equipment and facilities to enforce the rules of the no take zone are adequate [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK

j. There is an adequate communications program about the no take zone [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK

80

k. Staff of the no take zone are adequately trained [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK

l. There is a regular management effectiveness assessment conducted for the no take zone [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK

m.Research & monitoring activities of the no take area are adequate [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DKn. There are no current problems with the no take zone management [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK

SECTION 7 - ESTABLISH BASELINES FOR AND MEASURE CHANGE IN INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION SMART OBJECTIVES

(37) CUSTOMIZE to IC objectives in TOC - In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about benefits to the community of a well enforced sanctuary? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about this. Sa naka aging anom na bulan may kinahoron ka manongod sa benepisyo ki sanktwaryong dagat na napakaray an pagpalakaw? Kun iyo sisay an naka horon mo?

[ ] Have not talked to anyone (Wara ki nakahoron maski sisay)[ ] Talked to spouse/partner (nakistorya sa agom)[ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws (nakistorya sa ugangan)[ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or older (nakistorya sa mga anak 16 anyos pataas)[ ] Talked to your children aged 15 or younger (nakistorya sa mga anak 15 anyos pababa)[ ] Talked to friend or neighbor (nakistorya sa amigo asin pagtaraning)[ ] Talked to village elder or local authority (nakistorya sa gurang/membro sa Brgy.Council)[ ] Talked to National government environmental officials (nakistorya sa goberno)[ ] Talked to Non-government environment officials (nakistorya sa NGO opisyales)[ ] Talked to Local government environmental officials (nakistorya sa local na opisyales)[ ] Talked to a Local fisher or Gleaner (nakistorya sa taga Uson na mananagat)[ ] Other _________________________________A) If you did talk about this, can you tell me what the main thing was you discussed (ano man an napaghoronan nindo

manogod kaini?) ______________________________________________________________________________

( 37) In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about your role in reporting intrusions in the UBPBFSMR to the enforcement team in order to benefit the community? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about this. Sa naka aging anom na bulan may kinahoron ka manongod sa papel mo sa pagreport sa mga pagbalgar kI lei ki sanktwaryong dagat mga nagapalakaw kaini? Kun iyo sisay an maka horon mo?[ ] Have not talked to anyone (Wara ki nakahoron maski sisay)[ ] Talked to spouse/partner (nakistorya sa agom)[ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws (nakistorya sa ugangan)[ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or older (nakistorya sa mga anak 16 anyos pataas)

81

[ ] Talked to your children aged 15 or younger (nakistorya sa mga anak 15 anyos pababa)[ ] Talked to friend or neighbor (nakistorya sa amigo asin pagtaraning)[ ] Talked to village elder or local authority (nakistorya sa gurang/membro sa Brgy.Council)[ ] Talked to National government environmental officials (nakistorya sa goberno)[ ] Talked to Non-government environment officials (nakistorya sa NGO opisyales)[ ] Talked to Local government environmental officials (nakistorya sa local na opisyales)[ ] Talked to a Local fisher or Gleaner (nakistorya sa taga Uson na mananagat)[ ] Other _________________________________

A.If you did talk about this, can you tell me what the main thing was you discussed (ano man an napaghoronan nindo manogod kaini?) _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

38. In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about "the consequences of breaking the UBPBFSMR rules & regulations"? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about this. Sa naka aging anom na bulan may kinahoron ka manongod sa sa mga pagbalgar kI lei ki sanktwaryong dagat? Kun iyo sisay an maka horon mo?

[ ] Have not talked to anyone (Wara ki nakahoron maski sisay)[ ] Talked to spouse/partner (nakistorya sa agom)[ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws (nakistorya sa ugangan)[ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or older (nakistorya sa mga anak 16 anyos pataas)[ ] Talked to your children aged 15 or younger (nakistorya sa mga anak 15 anyos pababa)[ ] Talked to friend or neighbor (nakistorya sa amigo asin pagtaraning)[ ] Talked to village elder or local authority (nakistorya sa gurang/membro sa Brgy.Council)[ ] Talked to National government environmental officials (nakistorya sa goberno)[ ] Talked to Non-government environment officials (nakistorya sa NGO opisyales)[ ] Talked to Local government environmental officials (nakistorya sa local na opisyales)[ ] Talked to a Local fisher or Gleaner (nakistorya sa taga Uson na mananagat)[ ] Other _________________________________

A.If you did talk about this, can you tell me what the main thing was you discussed (ano man an napaghoronan nindo manogod kaini?) __________________________________________________

39. In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about "your own role in managing your local marine resources"? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about this.

[ ] Have not talked to anyone (Wara ki nakahoron maski sisay)[ ] Talked to spouse/partner (nakistorya sa agom)[ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws (nakistorya sa ugangan)[ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or older (nakistorya sa mga anak 16 anyos pataas)[ ] Talked to your children aged 15 or younger (nakistorya sa mga anak 15 anyos pababa)

82

[ ] Talked to friend or neighbor (nakistorya sa amigo asin pagtaraning)[ ] Talked to village elder or local authority (nakistorya sa gurang/membro sa Brgy.Council)[ ] Talked to National government environmental officials (nakistorya sa goberno)[ ] Talked to Non-government environment officials (nakistorya sa NGO opisyales)[ ] Talked to Local government environmental officials (nakistorya sa local na opisyales)[ ] Talked to a Local fisher or Gleaner (nakistorya sa taga Uson na mananagat)[ ] Other _________________________________

A.If you did talk about this, can you tell me what the main thing was you discussed (ano man an napaghoronan nindo manogod kaini?) __________________________________________________

SECTION 8 - ESTABLISH BASELINES FOR AND MEASURE CHANGE IN BEHAVIOR SMART OBJECTIVES

40. COHORT QUESTION - SHOW MAP LABELLED A – I am going to read you a list of different types of fishers, and for each one, I would like you to tell me whether you remember seeing someone like that fishing in this area in the past 6 months. Please answer S for Seen, NS for Not seen, and NS/DR for Not sure/Don't remember (show the No Take Zone (NTZ) on a map of the area but don't mention whether it is NTZ or not) . Basahan ta ika ki mga mga klase ki parasira na pwede mong nailing sa laog ki anom na bulan sa mapa na ini. An simbag po nakailing (s), dae naka iling (ns) o dae na maromodoman dae sigurado (ns/dr)

a. Subsistence fishers from your village mga sadit na parasira [ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DRb. Subsistence fishers from nearby villages mga sadit na parasira sa harani

sa Uson [ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR

c. Subsistence fishers from outside areas mga saradit na parasira na taga luwas kan Uson [ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR

d. Small-scale commercial fishers from your village mga sadit na commercial fishers [ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR

e. Small scale commercial fishers from nearby village sadit na commercial fishers harani sa Uson [ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR

f. Small scale commercial fishers from outside areas mga saradit na commercial fishers hale sa luwas kan Uson [ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR

g. Commercial fishers using trawls, ring net, etc (commercial fishers na minagamit ki trawl, bulibuli) [ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR

h. Large-scale industrial fishers using large trawls, purse seiner darakulang parasira na minagamit ki hulbot hulbot, trawl [ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR

i. Sports / Game fishers targeting Tuna, Bill fish, marlins etc para pana na mina banwit ki darakula na mga sira siring kan tuna asin iba pa na nagsisira sa lawod

[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR

j. Other resource users specializing in target fish such as aquarium fish, mollusks (trochus) and live fish, lobster, etc mga para sisid na minadakop ki buhay na sira, lobster asin mga darakulang shell o budyong

[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR

83

41. I am going to read you a list of different types of fishers, and for each one, I would like you to tell me whether you remember seeing someone like that fishing in this area in the past 1 year. Basahan ta ika ki mga mga klase ki parasira na pwede mong nailing sa laog ki sarong taon sa lugar nindo. An simbag po nakailing (s), dae naka iling (ns) o dae na maromodoman dae sigurado (ns/dr) Please answer S for Seen, NS for Not seen, and NS/DR for Not sure/Don't remember (show an area that is NOT a NTZ on a map of the area but don’t mention whether it is NTZ or not) COHORT QUESTION

k. Subsistence fishers from your village mga sadit na parasira [ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DRl. Subsistence fishers from nearby villages mga sadit na parasira sa harani

sa Uson [ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR

m.Subsistence fishers from outside areas mga saradit na parasira na taga luwas kan Uson [ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR

n. Small-scale commercial fishers from your village mga sadit na commercial fishers [ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR

o. Small scale commercial fishers from nearby village sadit na commercial fishers harani sa Uson [ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR

p. Small scale commercial fishers from outside areas mga saradit na commercial fishers hale sa luwas kan Uson [ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR

q. Commercial fishers using trawls, ring net, etc (commercial fishers na minagamit ki trawl, bulibuli) [ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR

r. Large-scale industrial fishers using large trawls, purse seiner darakulang parasira na minagamit ki hulbot hulbot, trawl [ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR

s. Sports / Game fishers targeting Tuna, Bill fish, marlins etc para pana na mina banwit ki darakula na mga sira siring kan tuna asin iba pa na nagsisira sa lawod

[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR

t. Other resource users specializing in target fish such as aquarium fish, mollusks (trochus) and live fish, lobster, etc mga para sisid na minadakop ki buhay na sira, lobster asin mga darakulang shell o budyong

[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR

42. COHORT QUESTION – During the past 6 months, would you say that you have been regularly involved, occasionally involved, or not involved with the creation and/or the management of a no-take fishing area in your local area (sa naka aging dose na bulan, masasabi mo na regular kang kaiba, paminsan minsa na kaiba sa pagmukna ni manihamiento sa UBPBFSMR

43.[ ] Regularly involved (kaiba pirmi) [ ] Occasionally involved (paminsan minsan lang)[ ] Never involved (dae maiba) [ ] Don't know/not applicable

44. In the past 12 months, have you attended any meetings related to UBPBFSMR Management, how many times did you attend? (sa naka aging dose na bulan, pirang beses naka atendir sa meeting manongod sa UBPBFSMR?

84

45. [ ] Never attended a meeting [ ] Attended at least 1 meeting[ ] Attended at between 2-5 meetings [ ] Attended at least 6 meetings[ ] More than 7 meetings [ ] Not applicable

46. In the past 12 months, have you attended the reef assessment of the UBPBFSMR about how many times did you attend? (sa naka aging dose na bulan, pirang beses naka atendir sa meeting manongod sa UBPBFSMR?

[ ] Never attended any assessment [ ] Attended at least once[ ] Attended at between twice [ ] Attended at least thrice[ ] More than thrice [ ] Not applicable

47. If you were to report someone who has broken the rules & regulations of the UBPBFSMR, who would you report them to? (kung ika ma report na may nag balga kan lei buda regulasyon sa UBPBFSMR kisay ka ma report? [YOU CAN CHOOSE MORE THAN ONE ANSWER].

[ ] Local police [ ] Local law enforcement[ ] Kapitan [ ] Municipal mayor[ ] Next door neighbor (pagtaraning) [ ] Husband/Wife[ ] Myembro kan local na manihamiento kan UBPBFSMR [ ] Dae ma Report [ ] Other ________________

48. In the last six months have you heard of anyone reporting someone breaking the UBPBFSMR rules & regulations to the enforcement team? (sa naka aging anom na bulan, nakadangog ka na igwang nag report na igwa ki mga pag balga kan mga lei asin regulasyon sa UBPBFSMR?) [ ] Yes [ ] No

SECTION 9 - UNDERSTAND BARRIERS & BENEFITS OF BEHAVIOR CHANGE

49. CUSTOMIZE TO THE BR STRATEGY - What benefits might there be in establishing a UBPBFSMR Management Committee? Ano sa hiling mo an pwede makuang benepisyo sa pag establisir ki Management Committee sa UBPBFSMR?) (Write in one or more answer, None or Don’t Know)

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

50. CUSTOMIZE TO THE BR STRATEGY - What barriers might there be in establishing a UBPBFSMR Management Committee? (Ano sa hiling mo an pwede maka ulang sa pag establisir ki Management Committee sa UBPBFSMR (Write in one or more answer, None or Don’t Know)

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

85

51. CUSTOMIZE TO SITE If you were to encourage a friend to stop intruding in the MPA to fish, what would you suggest would be a good incentive? (kung ika hapoton, ano an marhay na paagi na mainganyar an mga parasira na dae na mag dakop ki sira sa laog kan UBPBFSMR)[ ] receive public recognition by the Mayor (Makakuha ki pagmidbid sa publiko sa paagi ni Mayor)[ ] receive public recognition in the media (Makakiuha ki pagmidbid sa paagi kan radyo)[ ] be celebrated at a fiesta (iselebrar kasabay sa fiesta)[ ] receive an award (tawanan ki premyo o pagmidbid)[ ] knowing that you are protecting the food security of the children in the community Maogma nan a maka contribuer sa pagdakol ki sira para sa masurunod na henerasyon[ ] more and bigger fish in the future Mas dakol buda mas darakula na sira sa maabot na panahon[ ] Other ________________

52. CUSTOMIZE TO SITE If you were to encourage a friend to take part in the MPA management meetings, what would you suggest would be a good incentive? (kung ika an hahapoton, ano an marhay na pabuya tanganing maingganyo an mga tawo na mag atendir ki meeting kan UBPBFSMR

[ ] receive public recognition by the Mayor (Makakuha ki pagmidbid sa publiko sa poaagi ni Mayor)[ ] receive public recognition in the media (Makakiuha ki pagmidbid sa paagi kan radyo)[ ] be celebrated at a fiesta (iselebrar kasabay sa fiesta)[ ] receive an award (tawanan ki premyo o pagmidbid)[ ] knowing that you are protecting the food security of the children in the community Maogma nan a maka contribuer sa pagdakol ki sira para sa masurunod na henerasyon[ ] more and bigger fish in the future Mas dakol buda mas darakula na sira sa maabot na panahon[ ] Other ________________

SECTION 10 - EXPOSURE TO CAMPAIGN ACTIVITIES & MESSAGES

53. I am going to ask you about a number of ways in which you may or may not have seen or heard about the UBPBFSMR. For each method, I would like you to tell me whether you remember seeing or hearing that source in the past 6 months.

a. Traditional Music [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't knowb. Local News [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't knowc. National News [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't knowd. Sports [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't knowe. Religious Media Program [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't knowf. Talk Show Program [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't knowg. Puppet Show [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't knowh. Locally Produced Video [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

86

i. Poster or Billboard [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't knowj. Printed Booklet [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't knowk. Public Meeting (Festival) [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't knowl. Celebrity/Soap Star/Entertainer [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't knowm. SMS on your phone [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

54. Of all of the different ways in which you remember seeing or hearing about UBPBFSMR in the past 6 months, which one, if any, did you think had the most impact on you? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

55. Of all the different ways in which you learned about UBPBFSMR in the past 6 months, what do you think was the most important message that you learned from them? ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SECTION 11 - GROUND TRUTHING - NO OBJECTIVE56. Please name 3 creatures that live in the sea that you are particularly fond or proud of. (do not read out options but tick box as

appropriate and/or fill in the blank for any additional answers) - FLAGSHIP SPECIES QUESTION 1st Option[ ] snapper (bukhawon) [ ] giant sea clam (taklobo, hagdanan)[ ] parrot fish (mulmul) [ ] sea turtle (pawikan)[ ] sweet lips (lipti) [ ] red grouper (suno)[ ] rabbitfish -siganids (koyog) [ ] lobster (banagan)[ ] moray eel (palos) [ ] Other (iba pa) ________________

a. Please have a look at the 4 photographs labeled A,B,C,D. Which of the sea creatures shown on the photograph do you like best? – FLAGSHIP SP QUESTION - 2nd OPTION (Involved providing enumerators with labeled images)[ ] A (snapper) [ ] B (giant sea clam)[ ] C (parrot fish) [ ] D (sea turtle)[ ] E (sweet lips) [ ] F (red grouper)[ ] G (rabbitfish) [ ] lobster (banagan)

[ ] Other (iba pa) ________________

57. COHORT QUESTION - I am going to read you a number of strategies that might help solve any possible current problems in the management of your local no-take area. For each strategy, I would like you to tell me if you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree that it would help solve any current problems with managing the no-take area.

87

Igwa ako ki babasahon na mga istratehiya na pwedeng makatabang na maresolbar an manehamiento kan UBPBFSMR. Sa lambang babasahon, taramon mop o kun mina uyon ka ki marhay, uyon ka, dae ka uyon, daeng dae ka uyon o dae ka ki masasabi o kasimbagan

a. Increased local community involvement in management of the no take zone Pakikisumaro kan mga taga barangay sa pagmanehar kan UBPBFSMR

[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK

b. Limiting involvement in management of the no take zone to fishers only An mamenahar kan UBPBFSMR mga para sira sana

[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK

c. Increased and strict law enforcement of the no take zone rules by Police/Navy and EnforcersDugangan an parabantay buda pakosogon an pagpasunod kan lei kan mga pulis asin iba pa ba bantay

[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK

d. Increased and strict law enforcement of rules by local community fishers with enforcement rightsDugangan an pagpartisipar kan local na komunidad sa pagpasunod kan lei

[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK

e. Develop new rules for the no take zone in a process that includes the whole communityMagmukna ki bago na mga panuntunan sa paagi nin sarong proseso na masakob sa mga miyembro sa komunidad

[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK

f. Change the size and/or the location of the no take zoneBagohon an pinamugtakan kan UBPBFSMR asin bagohon an sakop na lugar kan ini

[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK

g. Make sure that local fishers have the exclusive right to fish in the areas around the no take zoneSiyertuhon na an mga parasira igwa ki exclusibong diretso na magsira sa palibot kan UBPBFSMR

[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK

SECTION 12 - CLIMATE CHANGE

58. Do you strongly agree (SA), agree (A), disagree (D), strongly disagree (SD), Not sure/Don't know (NS/DK) with the following statement:a. Climate change is not going to cause any problems in my

communityAn pagbago ki klima makakapagdara ki problema sa arin man na komunidad

[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK

88

b. Climate change is already a problem in my communityAn pagbago ki klima saro na namamatean na problema sa komunidad

[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK

c. Climate change is likely to become a real problem for my community in the coming 5-10 yearsAn pagbago ki klima siguradong magiging problema sa komunidad sa maabot na 5-10 taon

[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK

d. If our local NTZ is well managed it will help buffer some of the effects of climate change in the futureKun an UBPBFSMR marhay an palakaw, matabang ini na makabawas sa maraot na epekto kan pagbago ki klima sa maabot na panahon

[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK

59. Name up to 3 ways in which you believe climate change could affect your community in the next 5-10 years. (DO NOT READ OPTIONS, SELECT UP TO 3)Anu ano po sa imong pagmati an mga pwedeng mangyari na maka apekto sa komunidad sa maabot na lima hanggang sampolong taon?

[ ] sea level rise ( permanenteng pagtaas kan tubig sa dagat)[ ] increased water temperature leading death of corals and less fish (pag init kan tubig na ma kausa kan pagkagadan kan mga bahura asin madulot ki pagdiit kan sira sa dagat)[ ] increase of typhoon frequency (madakol an bilang kan bagyo na ma agi sa lugar na ini)[ ] increase of typhoon strength, less reliable work and crops (Mas makosog an mga bagyo, madiit an trabaho asin an mga pananom ma apektuhan[ ] more people from the upland will move to the coastal areas in case of crop failureAn mga naka istar sa bolod malipat sa tampi kan dagat kun magdiit an aning pananom[ ] change in weather patterns Mabago an panahon[ ] less rainmas diit an uran[ ] Other ________________ iba pa:__________________[ ] N/A

Dios Mabalos po!

89

Photos of KAP Survey conducted in three villages covered by the MPA

90

2.Executive Order for TWG & Mancom(Insert the Executive Order Document and/or other legal documents that outline the composition, roles and establishment of the TWG and Mancom (and Management Council if applicable))

3.Survey results(Refer to Result sections template in Lola, p 49-83)

Summary of ResultsThe survey sampled a cross section of the Uson Buang Pongco Bonga community, with and even split between men and women. The sample size represents four target audiences distributed as TA1: fishers (92); organized community members (92); coastal residents (243) and TA4 (10).

91

92

Target Audience occupation

93

94

95

Media Preferences of target Audiences

96

What about the other trusted sources? Please include all graphs

97

Practices

98

99

100

Please comments whether you think the data above from the stages of behavior question is reliable

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

This graph is mislabeled. Should read something like “% of TA who have seen different types of fishers inside the MPA”. Also please include full graph (options E, F, etc). Not sure why in your SMART objectives you used the option on fisgers targeting mollusks instead

of the option A and B above, as these % are really high.

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

4.EcoGov MPA Effectiveness Rating

Management Focus Relevant indicators

Total Available points

Actual Score per Management Focus

Actual Score divided by Total Available Points

Management Plan 4, 10, 27, 38, 39 9 1 11.1%Management Body 5, 11, 20, 29,32, 40 10 1 10.0%Legal Instrument and support 6, 9, 37, 41 6 5 83.3%Community Participation 1, 3, 8 7 7 100.0%Financing 12, 19, 28, 35, 49 7 3 42.9%IEC 7, 14, 23, 44, 45, 46 12 0 0.0%Enforcement 13, 15, 21, 25, 26, 30, 36 19 7 36.8%Monitoring and evaluation 2, 18, 24, 33, 34, 42, 43 9 2 22.2%Maintenance of infrastructure and site development

16, 17, 22, 31, 47, 48 6 2 33.3%

85Please add full criteria and scoring in your appendix

5.Letters of Support (Insert any letters of support for the campaign by key partners, politicians etc) (reference Lola p 169)

137

138

6.Threat Ranking Scope, Severity & Irreversibility

Each threat is ranked by Scope, Severity and Irreversibility against each target using the following scoring guide:

KEY TO THREAT CRITERIA (Based on Miradi definitions)A: SCOPE (Area)

4 = Very High: The threat is likely to be very widespread across all or much of your site.3 = High: The threat is likely to be widespread in its scope, and affect conservation targets at many locations at your site.2 = Medium: The threat is likely to be localized in its scope, and affect the conservation target at some of the target’s locations at the site.1 = Low: The threat is likely to be very localized in its scope, and affect the conservation target at a limited portion of the target’s location at the site.B: SEVERITY – The level of damage to the conservation target that can reasonably be expected under current circumstances (i.e., given the continuation of the existing situation).4 = Very High: The threat is likely to destroy or eliminate the conservation target over some portion of the target’s occurrence at the site.3 = High: The threat is likely to seriously degrade the conservation target over some portion of the target’s occurrence at the site.2 = Medium: The threat is likely to moderately degrade the conservation target over some portion of the target’s occurrence at the site.1 = Low: The threat is likely to only slightly impair the conservation target over some portion of the target’s occurrence at the site.C: IRREVERSIBILITY – The importance of taking immediate action to counter the threat.4 = Very High: The effects of the direct threat are not reversible (e.g., wetlands converted to a shopping center).3 = High: The effects of the direct threat are reversible, but not practically affordable (e.g., wetland converted to agriculture).2 = Medium: The effects of the direct threat are reversible with a reasonable commitment of resources (e.g., ditching and draining of wetland).1 = Low: The effects of the direct threat are easily reversible at relatively low cost (e.g., off-road vehicles trespassing in wetland).

139

(Insert jpeg from your Miradi threat ranking with brief summary explanation; include experts consulted and any assumptions made; if factor chains are not aligned with content of plan the explain any discrepancies) (reference

Serena island p35)

Poison fishing as a practice never came out in the KAP survey nor in focus group discussion. This was disclosed during the pre-University Phase when the CF conducted a structured interview to key informants. There sre about ten fishers practicing this but they claimed they were not from any of the MPA covered villsages. However, since they target species that inevitably use cyanide poison, the item on the threat ranking on poison fishing is considered top priority.This was the basis of identifying fishers as the primary audience apart from the fact that the campaign is done by a cohort. The poison fishers are not expected to come out in the open so that fishers as population in this campaign makes sense.

140

7.Factor Chain(Insert jpeg from your Miradi factor chains with brief summary explanation; include experts consulted and any assumptions made; if factor chains are not aligned with content of plan the explain any discrepancies) (reference Serena island p38)

141

Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of Albay

Municipality of Bacacay

OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL MAYOR

CREATING THE BACACAY MPA MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, MANDATING ITS FUNCTIONS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

WHEREAS, Article II, Section 16 of the 1987 Constitution provides that the State shall protect and advance the right of the people to a balanced and healthful ecology in accordance with the rhythm and harmony of nature;

WHEREAS, the Local Government Code of 1991 or Republic Act No. 7160, devolves the management of the municipal waters and its fisheries and aquatic resources to the municipal government;

WHEREAS, the Philippine Fisheries Code of 1998 or Republic Act 8550, mandates that the municipal government may enact appropriate ordinances which shall ensure the sustainable development, management and conservation of its territorial waters including its fisheries and aquatic resources;

WHEREAS, the municipality of Bacacay enacted Municipal Ordinance (MO) No. 197 series of 2002 which provides for the establishment and management of the Uson Buang Pongco Bonga Fish Sanctuary and Marine Reserve;

WHEREAS, the Bacacay LGU in partnership with the Barangay Local Government of Uson and RARE Incorporated implements a two-year Bacacay Marine Sanctuary Pride Program;

WHEREAS, effective and sustained governance and enforcement of marine sanctuaries in Bacacay is an essential component for the successful and meaningful implementation of the two-year Bacacay Marine Sanctuary Pride Program;

142

WHEREAS, there is still a need to clearly delineate the policy-making and implementing components of the management body and to encourage the participation of various sectors in the management of the marine sanctuaries;

NOW, THEREFORE, premises considered, and by virtue of the powers vested in me by law, I, Hon. Tobias Betito, Mayor of Bacacay, do hereby order the following:

Section 1. CREATION and COMPOSITION. There is hereby created a Bacacay MPA Management Committee (MC) that shall serve as the implementing unit of the management body managing the Bacacay Marine Sanctuary. The MC shall serve as the implementing unit of the management body, while the TWG serves as the policy-making unit. The MC shall be composed of a municipal level management executive committee that shall consist of the following:

Municipal level executive committee:

1. Municipal Agriculturist or his/her representative2. Municipal Environmental Management Office (MENRO) or representative3. SB Chair Committee on Environment4. Barangay Captain of Uson or representative5. Bgy Captain of Buang or representative6. Bgy. Captain of Pongco Bonga or representative

The barangay level MC shall be composed of the following: 1. Members of the Barangay Council2. People’s Organizations 3. Members of the BFARMC4. Representatives of the Bantay dagat in the area5. School teachers6. Purok leaders7. Representative from a women’s organization in the area8. Representative of the Youth organization in the area9. Representative of the religious group in the area 10.Senior citizens11.Business organization

Section 2. FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES. The Bacacay MPA Management Committee shall enforce the rules and regulations pertaining to the protection, maintenance, and conservation of the marine sanctuaries in the municipality and supervise day-to-day operations with the following specific functions and responsibilities;

Municipal level MC:

143

a) Prepare and implement the Bacacay MPA Annual Investment Plan and Budget based on the long-term Management Plan prepared by the Bacacay MPA TWG;

b) Assist in the facilitation of meetings at the barangay level MC activities;c) Propose and recommend policy initiatives to the Barangay, Municipal Legislative Councils and the Bacacay MPA

TWG;d) Supervise the conduct of regular patrolling and guarding of the MPA done by barangay and municipal

enforcement teams;e) Supervise the conduct of regular biophysical and socio-economic surveys; f) Conduct orientation and training workshops on MPA-related activities;g) Supervise the conduct of Information, Education and Communication Campaign;h) Prepare proposals for submission to the Bacacay MPA TWG for their resource generation activities;i) Prepare activity and financial reports to be submitted to the Bacacay MPA TWG;j) Coordinate with the Barangay level Management Committees;k) Perform such functions as deemed necessary

Barangay level organizations1. Conduct regular patrolling in the marine sanctuaries2. Encourage barangay governments to incorporate MPA management related activities in the barangay annual

investment plan3. Conduct regular biophysical and socio-economic monitoring with assistance from Bacacay MPA TWG4. Conduct IEC-related activities5. Collect user fees in accordance with the relevant municipal ordinances and remit to the MLGU their share of the

collected fees6. Implement environmental-friendly livelihood activities supportive of MPA management with assistance from MLGU

and national agencies7. Maintain the patrol boat, billboards, buoys and guardhouse8. Coordinate with the municipal level MC

Section 3. OFFICERS AND TERMS OF OFFICE. The Bacacay MPA MC shall be led by the Municipal Agriculture Office. The Municipal Agriculture Office shall serve as the secretariat of the MC. The MEC at the barangay level shall be led by the Chair of the Bgy Development Council. The MC members at the barangay shall sign up for membership in the four (4) subcommittees. The subcommittees of the MC at the local level shall be elected by the members of the PO. The term of office of the local level MC chairperson and subcommittee chairperson shall be two years.

Section 4. REPLACEMENT OF OFFICERS. Non-performing MC Officers at both the municipal and local level may be replaced by the Local Chief Executive with reasonable cause and upon recommendation of the TWG.

144

Section 5. MEETINGS. The Bacacay MPA MEC at the municipal shall meet at least once month. The MCs at the local levels shall also meet regularly at least once a month. The MC members shall hold a regular meeting upon proper notice from the chairperson.

Section 5.MPA MANAGEMENT SUBCOMMITTEES. The municipal level MEC shall coordinate the activities of the subcommittees at the local barangay level. The MC at the barangay level shall consist of the following subcommittees: 1] Law Enforcement and Maintenance, 2] IEC/ Capability Building, 3] Resource Monitoring and Evaluation, 4] Livelihood and Ecotourism. The subcommittees at the barangay levels shall perform the following functions:

Law Enforcement and Maintenance Regular guarding and patrolling within the marine sanctuary Maintain a logbook system for the enforcement activities in the MPA Apprehension of violators of the marine sanctuary ordinance Ensure that bantay dagat members are properly trained and deputized Repair and replace dilapidated/destroyed buoy/markers, patrol boats, and other infrastructure related to the MPA Act as witness during court litigation

Resource Monitoring and Evaluation: Conduct regular monitoring of the biophysical status of the marine sanctuary, Conduct regular monitoring of the socio-economic status of the fishers in the area; Retrieve waste and other non-biodegradable materials at the bottom of the marine sanctuary that are detrimental to

the growth of corals,

IEC/Capacity Building

Conduct regular information dissemination within their respective barangays regarding the MPA, Disseminate information on the different activities that are allowed and prohibited in the marine sanctuary Keep records such as management plans, financial reports, enforcement logbooks, minutes of meetings, ordinances,

resolutions, pictures, videos, etc.

Livelihood/Ecotourism Committee Recommend project ideas and prepare project proposals for the financial sustainability of the management of the

MPA Oversee the expenditure related to MPA management based on the MPA management plan and budget Track all revenues generated by the MPA and make a report on its application Supervise the collection of user fees

145

Oversee the implementation of livelihood activities in the area Monitor and report the progress of all livelihood projects in the area.

Section 7. SOURCES OF FUNDS AND ACCOUNTING SYSTEM. The Municipal and Barangay Governments shall allocate annually funds to implement the Bacacay Marine Sanctuary Management Plan and other necessary activities of the Management Committee. The application of funds shall follow the regular government accounting procedures. The expenses incurred in the conduct of monthly meetings at the barangay level shall be shouldered primarily by the PO and supported by the municipal government.

Section 8. OBLIGATION OF THE BARANGAY GOVERNMENTS. The barangay governments of Uson, Buang and Pongco-Bunga are obliged to allocate funding for the management of the MPA and to support its management.

Section 9. This Executive Order shall take effect immediately upon signing hereof.”

Done this ___________________ at Bacacay, Albay, Philippines.

HON. TOBIAS C. BETITO Municipal Mayo

146