pedestrian & bicycle roadway design – safe, smart and defendable
DESCRIPTION
Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable. Connecting Communities & People with Trails 2010 Workshop Series Ottawa County Parks & Recreation Commission August 12, 2010. Josh DeBruyn, AICP Pedestrian and Bicycle Coordinator Michigan Department of Transportation. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Pedestrian & BicycleRoadway Design –
Safe, Smart and Defendable
Josh DeBruyn, AICPPedestrian and Bicycle Coordinator
Michigan Department of Transportation
Connecting Communities & People with Trails2010 Workshop Series
Ottawa County Parks & Recreation CommissionAugust 12, 2010
![Page 2: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Developed in Response to:
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/Ped-BicycleSafety3-7-06_162714_7.pdf
![Page 3: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Safety & Liability
Does pursuit of safety expose an agency to liability?
• liability for action
• liability for inaction
• liability for trying something new
![Page 4: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Safety & Liability
Safety - Driven by Profession
Liability - Imposed by Law
![Page 5: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Professional best practice:– AASHTO
• e.g. “The Green Book”
– ITE / FHWA Guidelines and Research
– MDOT Design Manuals
– MMUTCD
– What has worked elsewhere
Safety
![Page 6: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Bicyclists Belong on the Road
SOURCE: The Greenway Collaborative, Inc. www.greenwaycollab.com
Motorists scan roadway for vehicles,
don’t often scan sidewalk
Typical Typical crash crash scenarioscenario
![Page 7: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Pedestrians won’t go out of their way!
![Page 8: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Ideally, pedestrians would cross at a Ideally, pedestrians would cross at a controlled intersectioncontrolled intersection
![Page 9: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
But the reality is quite differentBut the reality is quite different
![Page 10: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Crossing the street: no problem, right?
Pedestrians take greater chances
When crossing opportunities are low,
![Page 11: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The Greenway Collaborative, Inc. www.greenwaycollab.com
Pedestrians: Safety in Numbers
More Pedestrians = Increased Driver Expectations of Encountering a Pedestrian = Increased Pedestrian Safety
![Page 12: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
What is a good pedestrian / bicycle design?
• put peds/bikes in logical travel paths
• put peds/bikes where they will be seen by motorists
• make clear to motorists where to expect peds/bikes
• calm traffic flow
![Page 13: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Features that increase motorist expectation of bikes/peds:
The Greenway Collaborative, Inc. www.greenwaycollab.com
• Conspicuous geometry• median refuge island• curb extensions
• Conspicuous markings/signs• crosswalk• bike lane• route designation
![Page 14: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Four GOOD Design Ideas
to Enhance
Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety
![Page 15: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
BIKE LANES1.
They’re safer than sidewalk
![Page 16: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
• Major Streets w/o Bike Lanes 1.28• Minor Streets w/o Bike Lanes 1.04*• Streets with Bike Lanes 0.50• Sidewalks 5.32 (* = shared roadway) (1.0 = median)
Source: William Morita, U.W. – “Accident Rates for Various Bicycle Facilities” – based on 2,374 riders, 4.4 million miles
Bicyclist Danger Index
![Page 17: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
One strategy: Narrow Existing Lanes to Provide Bike Lanes
![Page 18: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Striped Bicycle Lanes
• Typically done during repaving
• Can have a traffic calming effect on multiple lane roads.
![Page 19: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Challenge: Right Turn Lanes
![Page 20: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Challenge: Right Turn Lanes
Columbia, MO
![Page 21: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
4-to-3 Lane Conversions -“Road Diets”
2.
ALLleft turns cross one lane only
![Page 22: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Michigan study – 8 corridors
Injury crashes
26%
E. Lansing M-43
Ped. Injuries
37%
![Page 23: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Benefits of Road Diets for Pedestrians
Fewer travel lanes to cross
With medians or crossing island: break a long crossing into 2 shorter crossings
Reduce top end travel speeds
![Page 24: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
MID-BLOCK CROSSINGS
• People Will Cross Anyway – Make it Safer
• No Turning Movements - No
“right-hook”
• Crossing only One Direction of Travel at a Time
The Greenway Collaborative, Inc. www.greenwaycollab.com
3.
With refuge island
![Page 25: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
The alternative to mid-block crossings:The alternative to mid-block crossings:
![Page 26: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Median refuge islands – shorter and safer crossing
Lansing
Bulb-outIsland
Bulb-out
National statistics: refuge islands reduce
pedestrian crashes by 40%
![Page 27: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
ISSUE: Multiple Lanes Create a Multiple Threat Crash Scenario
![Page 28: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
SOLUTION: Set Yield Lines Back
30’
![Page 29: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
STAGGERED CROSSWALKS - point pedestrians in right direction
![Page 30: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Signing Rural Roads as Bike Routes
4.
New York State Bikeway
![Page 31: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
AASHTO: Some rural highways are used by touring bicyclist for intercity and recreational travel.
Paved shoulders can significantly improve the safety and convenience of bicyclists and motorists along such routes.
Shoulders as Bicycle Facilities
![Page 32: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Bike Routes
• Wayfinding tool - not a facility
– Guide to specific destinations
– Use strategically for less obvious routes
![Page 33: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
State – significant trails:
Southern Michigan Cross State Trail
![Page 34: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
County routes:
Bridge-to-Bay trail
St. Clair county
![Page 35: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Are these legally defensible?
• Bike Lanes - ?
• 4 – 3 Lane Conversions (Road Diet) - ?
• Mid-Block Crossings - ?
• Signing Rural Bike Routes - ?
![Page 36: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Road
Agency
Liability
![Page 37: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
The Highway Exception:
“…each governmental agency shall maintain the highway in reasonable repair so that it is reasonably safe and convenient for public travel.”
Governmental Tort Liability Act – MCL 691.1402(1)
Highway Exception:
![Page 38: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
“The purpose of the highway exception is not … an unrealistic duty to ensure that travel upon the highways will always be safe. … [W]e discern that the true intent of the Legislature is to impose a duty to keep the physical portion of the traveled roadbed in reasonable repair.”
-Wilson v Alpena Co Rd Comm (2006)
Highway Exception:
![Page 39: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
““Repair and Maintain” only:Repair and Maintain” only:
• No general duty to make road “safe”No general duty to make road “safe”
• Repair broken or dilapidated surfaceRepair broken or dilapidated surface
• No requirement to “improve, augment or No requirement to “improve, augment or
expand”expand”
• Maintain what was originally builtMaintain what was originally built
Nawrocki v Macomb Co Rd Comm (2000)
Highway Exception:
![Page 40: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
No liability for:
• Design or redesign defects:
“The plain language of the highway exception to governmental immunity provides that the road commission has a duty to repair and maintain, not a duty to design or redesign.”
Hanson v Board of Rd Commissioners of Mecosta County (2002)
![Page 41: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
No liability for:
• Lane width• Shoulder width• Normal cross slope• Horizontal curvature • Super elevation • Transition area
• Vertical curvature• Vertical clearance• Stopping sight distance• Bridge width• Horizontal clearance• Structural capacity
![Page 42: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
No liability for:
• Traffic signs and signals:
“…state or county road commissions have no duty, under the highway exception, to install, maintain, repair, or improve traffic control devices, including traffic signs.”
Nawrocki v Macomb Co Rd Comm (2000)
“The highway exception does not impose a duty on municipalities to install, maintain, repair, or improve traffic signals.”
Johnson-McIntosh v City of Detroit (2006)
![Page 43: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
• Street light poles:
“…streetlight poles, like “traffic signals and signs,” are not part of the definition of “highway”…(under the highway exception).”
Weaver v Detroit (2002)
[relying on Nawrocki]
No liability for:
![Page 44: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
No liability for:
• Accumulations of ice and snow
“…the accumulation … of ice and snow on a sidewalk, regardless of whether it accumulated through natural causes or otherwise, does not constitute a "defect" in the sidewalk”
Estate of Buckner v. City of Lansing (2008)
![Page 45: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Liability limited to:
Vehicular travel lanes:*Vehicular travel lanes:*““The duty …extends only to the improved The duty …extends only to the improved portion of the highway portion of the highway designed for designed for vehicular travelvehicular travel and does not include and does not include sidewalks, trail ways, crosswalks, or any sidewalks, trail ways, crosswalks, or any other installation outside of the improved other installation outside of the improved portion of the highway designed for portion of the highway designed for vehicular travel.” vehicular travel.”
Grimes v MDOT (2006)
*Applies to state and county roads only
![Page 46: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Liability limited to:
Maintenance conditions that “… a reasonable road commission would understand …posed an unreasonable threat to safe public travel…”
Wilson v Alpena Co Rd Comm (2006)
•Road surface “defects”:
![Page 47: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Liability for road surface conditions:
– Rutting
– Potholes
– Manhole covers
– Dilapidated road surface
– Traveled (vehicle) lane edge drops
– Missing storm sewer grates
![Page 48: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
No liability for:
• Rough or uneven surfaces
“Nearly all highways have more or less rough and uneven places in them, over which it is unpleasant to ride; but because they have, it does not follow that they are unfit and unsafe for travel.”
Wilson v Alpena Co Rd Comm (2006)
![Page 49: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Are these legally defensible?
• Bike Lanes -
• 4 – 3 Lane Conversions (Road Diet) -
• Mid-Block Crossings -
• Signing Rural Bike Routes -
YES
YES
YES
YES
![Page 50: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
No Agency Liability Because:
• No Design liability
• All involve signs, signals, or features outside the road bed surface
• Recognized as a reasonable measure to address a specific safety problem
• Empirical evidence it promotes safer travel
![Page 51: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
PublicEmployee
Liability
![Page 52: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Public Employee Liability• Employee/agent immune from tort liability if all
the following conditions are met:
– Employee acting within the scope of his or her authority.
– Engaged in the exercise or discharge of a
governmental function.– Conduct does not amount to gross negligence that
is the proximate cause of the injury or damage.
MCL 691.1407 (2)
![Page 53: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Gross Negligence means conduct so reckless as to demonstrate a substantial lack of concern for whether an injury results.
• Examples:
– Stop sign down or covered by vegetation
– Employee running a stop sign or speeding while talking on cell phone
Public Employee Liability
![Page 54: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Public Employee Liability
“The” proximate cause of the injury or damage:
– Supreme Court defined as “the most immediate, direct and efficient cause of “ damage”
– Only one proximate cause
Robinson v Detroit (2000)
![Page 55: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Are these legally defensible?
• Bike Lanes -
• 4 – 3 Lane Conversions (Road Diet) -
• Mid-Block Crossings -
• Signing Rural Bike Routes -
YES
YES
YES
YES
![Page 56: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Risk of public employee liability is slight because:
• No gross negligence:– Recognized as a reasonable measure to address a
specific safety problem– Empirical evidence it promotes safer travel
• More than a single cause of the accident and injury– Injured driver error– Other driver error
![Page 57: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
LIABILITY SUMMARY:
• AGENCY liability risk low:– Repair and Maintain
– No design liability– Road bed surface only
• PUBLIC EMPLOYEE liability risk also low:– Gross negligence standard– “The” proximate cause requirement
![Page 58: Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design – Safe, Smart and Defendable](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c08550346895db9082e/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Thank You
Questions?
MDOT’S MISSIONProviding the highest quality integrated transportation service for economic
benefit and improved quality of life.