paul foster, director, barton willmore
TRANSCRIPT
BARTONWILLMORE
UK Onshore Oil and Gas:
Planning and Environment Summit
Wednesday, 6th July, 2016
Manchester Conference Centre
BARTONWILLMORE
Paul Foster
Planning Director
“Speeding up the planning process for
shale gas whilst ensuring local
communities are fully involved in
planning decisions that affect them –
an impossible dream?”
What has the Government done to speed up the Planning System for
Shale Gas?
How does Cuadrilla’s and Third Energy’s experience of the planning
system compare to appealing against non-determination?
What are the public’s key concerns about shale gas extraction and
how they can they be addressed?
Can the system cope with the expected increase in planning
applications?
Is there a quicker and fairer way to determine shale gas applications?
The message from Government is clear …
“We need more secure home grown energy supplies – and shale gas must
play a part in that. To ensure we get this industry up and running we can’t
have a planning system that sees applications dragged out for months, or
even years on end. Oversight by the Health and Safety Executive and the
Environment Agency of shale developments makes our commitment to
safety and the environment crystal clear. We now need, above all else, a
system that delivers timely planning decisions and works effectively for
local people and developers”
Amber Rudd MP
Secretary of State Energy and Climate Change
13th August 2015
And more recently …
“We need to tackle the issue of extensive planning delays head-on if we are
to reap the benefits that shale gas offers to our energy security, jobs and
wider economy.
Firms that want to explore for shale need to be confident that their
applications will be processed in a timely way and examined purely on a
planning basis. The new measures we’ve introduced will help to make this
happen.
We are addressing a problem that causes unnecessary delays and benefits
no one.”
Andrea Leadsom MP
Minister of State for Energy and Climate Change
18th May 2016
What has the Government done to speed up the planning system
(in England) for shale gas development so far?
September 2015 Planning for Onshore Oil and Gas Written Statement
Identifying underperformance of
LPAs in respect of all onshore
oil and gas applications
50% or fewer applications made
within the statutory
determination period or agreed
extension on 3 or more
applications, in 2016 until 2019
SoS will take account of
exceptional circumstances
before naming and shaming for
1 year
SoS will consider calling in any
oil & gas applications during this
period.
Greg Clark MP
September 2015 Shale Gas and Oil Policy Written Statement
Clarity about a national need to explore shale gas and oil
Shale gas will be a bridge to support climate change targets and
help reduce high-carbon fuels such as coal.
Clear expectation that local planning authorities should ensure that decisions on
[shale gas] applications are made within the statutory timeframes: 16 weeks where
an application is subject to EIA
Appeals against refusals of planning permission or against non-determination will be
treated as priority for urgent resolution
Recovery criteria for appeals means SoS is likely to recover appeals for shale gas
Active consideration of calling in shale applications (but will this make a difference?)
April 2016 – amendments to Town and Country Planning General Permitted
Development Order 2016
Drilling of boreholes for groundwater and seismic monitoring no longer requires
formal planning application if up to 28 days with no notification to the MPA, and up to
24 months for groundwater monitoring where notification is given in advance,
subject to conditions and limits
Lord Bourne of
Aberystwyth
In reality …
Applications by Cuadrilla Bowland for
up to four exploration wells, hydraulic
fracturing, testing, gas pipeline and
connection to gas network
Application ref LCC/2014/0096 – Preston
New Road, Little Plumpton, Fylde
Application ref LCC/2014/0101 –
Roseacre Wood, Fylde
Submitted: 2 June 2014
Validated: 5 June 2014
Refused: 29 June 2015
Appeal submitted: 27 July 2015
Recovery letter: 26 November 2015
Planning Inquiry: 9 February-16
March 2016
Inspector’s Report to SoS: 4 July
2016
SoS’s decision: ?
2 years so far
Application by Third Energy UK Gas
Limited to hydraulically stimulate and
test the various geological formations
previously identified during the 2013
KM8 drilling operation, followed by the
production of gas from one or more of
these formations into the existing
production facilities, followed by wellsite
restoration.
Application ref NY/2015/0233/ENV –
KMA wellsite, Alma Farm, Kirby
Misperton
Submitted: 15 May 2015
Resubmitted: 29 July 2015
Validated: 29 July 2015
Permitted: 27 May 2016
1 year
Pushing the Non-Determination Appeal Button
What would a typical timetable for non-determination of appeal for hydraulic fracturing
operations look like?
o Week 1 – validation of planning application
o Week 17 – appeal against non-determination
o Week 25 – Appeal recovered by SoS
o Week 30 – Public Inquiry opens
o Week 32 – Public Inquiry closes
o Week 47 – Inspector Report submitted to SoS
o Week 60 – SoS issues decision
Public engagement
“The Government is committed to ensuring that local communities
are fully involved in planning decisions that affect them. . . It is
important that the public has objective information about shale and
that communities are effectively engaged.”
Greg Clark
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
16 September 2015
“Industry needs to engage early and often with local communities.
Local communities are at the heart of the developing shale gas
industry which will bring benefits for the whole nation. We must all
continue to challenge the myths and misconceptions about shale.”
Andrea Leadsom
Minister of State for Energy and Climate Change
18 May 2016
But it’s clearly still not working …
The key concerns
Lack of technical understanding hampering informed decision-making
Impact on aquifers and groundwater supply
Vehicle movements
Remediation
Impact on climate change
Induced seismicity
Total objection in principle to fracking
Source: Atlas
And the practical challenges for all parties
Scale and detail of information prepared, understood and digested
Costs in resources and time to monitor and respond to consultation
comments from stakeholders and the local community
Unending demands for more information to be provided by operators
Dissecting what is not material to the consideration in land-use planning
If there is a national need to explore for shale gas, what can be done to
make the process fairer and quicker and more certain for all concerned?
Fairer
o Earlier and regular engagement with stakeholders and community
groups to provide answers
o Transparency from the start
o Try to avoid technical language and jargon
o Use the screening and scoping stages to your advantage
o Be upfront at the start about the possibility of appealing against non-
determination
o Explain to communities what are material considerations and weight
attributed
Quicker
o Front load the process - no surprises when the application is submitted
to the MPA
o Upfront timeline agreed with operator and LPA – Planning Performance
Agreements?
o Consider the appeal route for hydraulic fracturing after 16 weeks
• Advantages
Priority for resolution by PINS
Prospect of more certainty about outcome if recovered by SoS
Comparable timeframe to determination by MPA (TEL and Cuadrilla)
Still incorporates public engagement
• Disadvantages
Costs of public inquiry
Takes the decision making out of the hands of the local authority
PINS resources and capability
Conclusions
A partnership approach between the operator, the MPA and stakeholders
will pay dividends in the future
Full and early engagement with the local community to explain and inform
but accept many will never be persuaded
Focus on the most relevant information and avoid jargon
Don’t be afraid to appeal against non-determination – that’s what it is there
for!
bartonwillmore.co.uk
BARTONWILLMORE