patient safety metrics
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
CLINICAL PERFORMANCE AND EMPLOYEE SAFETY METRICSExecutive Dashboard
NIH Clinical Center
October 2017
![Page 2: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Patients’ Perceptions• Overall Hospital Rating• Would you Recommend the NIH CC?
![Page 3: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
Qtr 1 2016 Qtr 2 2016 Qtr 3 2016 Qtr 4 2016 Qtr 1 2017 Qtr 2 2017
Per
cen
t P
osi
tive
Sco
reOverall Hospital Rating
Overall Rating of Hospital - Inpatient Overall Rating of Hospital - Outpatient
NRC Benchmark (Inpatient) CMS HCAHPS Benchmark (Inpatient)
![Page 4: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
Qtr 1 2016 Qtr 2 2016 Qtr 3 2016 Qtr 4 2016 Qtr 1 2017 Qtr 2 2017
Per
cen
t P
osi
tive
Res
po
nse
Would You Recommend the NIH CC?
Would Recommend Hospital - Inpatient Would Recommend Hospital - Outpatient
NRC Benchmark (Inpatient) CMS HCAHPS Benchmark (Inpatient)
![Page 5: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Infection Control Metrics • Hand Hygiene• Central-Line Associated Bloodstream Infections
• Whole-house• Intensive Care Unit
• Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections• Intensive Care Unit• Surgical Oncology
![Page 6: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2015-Q4 2016-Q1 2016-Q2 2016-Q3 2016-Q4 2017-Q1 2017-Q2 2017-Q3
Per
cen
t A
dh
eren
ce
Hand Hygiene Adherence
Data collected by Unit-based
Data collected by Independent Auditors
![Page 7: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
2015-Q4 2016-Q1 2016-Q2 2016-Q3 2016-Q4 2017-Q1 2017-Q2
Infe
ctio
ns
per
10
00
cat
het
er d
ays
Whole-house Central-Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) Rate
n=7n=6
n=6
![Page 8: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
2015-Q4 2016-Q1 2016-Q2 2016-Q3 2016-Q4 2017-Q1 2017-Q2
Infe
ctio
ns
per
10
00
cat
het
er d
ays
ICU Central-Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) Rate
ICU CLABSI Rate NHSN ICU Benchmark
n=1
n=1n=1
![Page 9: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
2015-Q4 2016-Q1 2016-Q2 2016-Q3 2016-Q4 2017-Q1 2017-Q2 2017-Q3
Infe
ctio
n p
er 1
00
0 f
ole
y d
ays
ICU Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections
ICU CAUTI Rate NHSN ICU Benchmark
n=1
![Page 10: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
2015-Q4 2016-Q1 2016-Q2 2016-Q3 2016-Q4 2017Q1 2017-Q2
Infe
ctio
ns
per
10
00
cat
het
er d
ays
Surgical Oncology Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections
Surgical Oncology NHSN Benchmark
![Page 11: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
2015-Q4 2016-Q1 2016-Q2 2016-Q3 2016-Q4 2017-Q1 2017-Q2
Infe
ctio
ns
per
10
0 P
roce
du
res
Surgical Site Infections (SSI) Rate
SSI Rate Clinical Center Average
![Page 12: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Nursing Quality Metrics • Falls• Pressure Injury• Medication Administration Barcoding
![Page 13: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
2015-Q4 2016-Q1 2016-Q2 2016-Q3 2016-Q4 2017-Q1 2017-Q2
Falls
per
10
00
pat
ien
t d
ays
Inpatient Falls Rate
Falls Rate NDNQI Benchmark
![Page 14: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
2015-Q4 2016-Q1 2016-Q2 2016-Q3 2016-Q4 2017-Q1 2017-Q2 2017-Q3
% o
f Su
rvey
ed P
atie
nts
wit
h H
osp
ital
-Acq
uir
ed P
ress
ure
Inju
ries
Pressure Injury Prevalence
CC Mean National Mean (NDNQI)
The uptick in pressure injuries is largely due to injuries associated with long complex operative cases. An
interdisciplinary team (nursing, surgery, anesthesia, wound care) reviewed OR positioning practices, use of
compression stockings, oral breakdown related to endotracheal tubes, etc..
![Page 15: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
90%
91%
92%
93%
94%
95%
96%
97%
98%
99%
100%
Med
icat
ion
Bar
cod
ing
Use
(%
)Knowledge Based Medication Administration (KBMA)
Medication Barcoding Usage Report
% KMBA Used Goal
![Page 16: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Emergency Response• Code Blue and Rapid Response
• Types of Patients• Type of Event• Patient Disposition
![Page 17: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
16-Qtr 4 17-Qtr 1 17-Qtr 2 17-Qtr 3 Total
Inpt 10 15 21 12 58
Outpt 12 9 11 13 45
Employee 14 16 8 9 47
Visitor 3 2 3 4 12
Incorrect Calls 0 0 0 0 0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180N
um
be
r
Code Blue Response: Types of "Patients"
![Page 18: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
16-Qtr 4 17-Qtr 1 17-Qtr 2 17-Qtr 3 TOTAL
Arrest 1 2 5 2 10
Acute Emergency 14 14 10 9 47
Stable Event 25 26 28 27 106
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180N
um
be
r
Code Blue Response: Type of Event
![Page 19: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
16-Qtr 4 17-Qtr 1 17-Qtr 2 17-Qtr 3 TOTAL
Transfer to ICU 12 10 14 7 43
Transfer to OSH 13 15 8 10 46
Remained on Unit 4 6 14 13 37
Expired 1 1 1 0 3
Released 3 2 2 1 8
Other 7 8 4 7 26
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180N
um
be
r
Code Blue Response: Patient Disposition
![Page 20: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
16-Qtr 4 17-Qtr 1 17-Qtr 2 17-Qtr 3 Total
ICU 5 7 11 8 31
Unit/Other 1 0 1 0 2
Remained on Unit 5 10 14 13 42
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80N
um
be
r
Rapid Response Team: Patient Disposition
![Page 21: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Blood and Blood Product Use• Crossmatch to Transfusion (C:T) Ratio• Transfusion Reaction by Class• Unacceptable Blood Bank Specimens
![Page 22: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
2015_Q4 2016_Q1 2016_Q2 2016_Q3 FY2016_Q4 FY2017_Q1 FY2017_Q2 FY2017_Q3
Cro
ssm
atch
to
Tra
nsf
use
d U
nit
s R
atio
Crossmatch to Transfusion (C:T) Ratio
C:T Ratio CC C:T Ratio Goal
The NIH CC goal is to have a C:T ratio of 2.0 or less. Monitoring this metric ensures that blood is
not held unused in reserve when it could be available for another patient.
![Page 23: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
0.000
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.006
0.007
0.008
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
FY2015 FY2016 FY2017
Per
cen
t o
f Tr
ansf
usi
on
sTransfusion Reactions by Class
Anaphlactic and Other Febrile, Non Hemolytic Hemolytic, Septic, Anaphlactoid, and TRALI
![Page 24: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sept-17
Per
cen
t u
nac
cep
tab
le s
pec
imen
s
Unacceptable Blood Bank Specimens
Percent specimens with collection problems CC Threshold
![Page 25: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Clinical Documentation• Medical Record Completeness
• Delinquent Records• “Agent for” Countersignature Adherence• Unacceptable Abbreviation Use
• Accuracy of Coding
![Page 26: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17
% r
eco
rds
del
inq
uen
t af
ter
30
day
sDelinquent Records
(>30 days post discharge)
Joint Commission Benchmark Delinquent Records
![Page 27: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% v
erb
al o
rder
s si
gned
in 7
2 h
ou
rs
"Agent for" Orders Countersignature Compliance
% of Compliance CC Goal
![Page 28: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2014-Q1 2014-Q2 2014-Q3 2014-Q4 2015-Q1 2015-Q2 2015-Q3 2015-Q4 2016-Q1 2016-Q2 2016-Q3 2016-Q4 2017-Q1 2017-Q2 2017-Q3
% a
pp
rop
riat
e u
se o
f ab
bre
viat
ion
s"Do Not Use" Abbreviation Adherence
Compliance with Abbreviation Use CC Goal
![Page 29: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2014-Q1 2014-Q2 2014-Q3 2014-Q4 2015-Q1 2015-Q2 2015-Q3 2015-Q4 2016-Q1 2016-Q2 2016-Q3 2016-Q4 2017-Q1 2017-Q2
% a
ccu
racy
of
cod
ing
Accuracy of Record Coding
Accuracy of Coding CC Goal
New staff on-board;
transitioning to ICD-10
![Page 30: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Employee Safety • Occupational Injury and Illness
![Page 31: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
TRC ORC DAFW DJTR DART
NU
MB
ER O
F C
ASE
S
OSHA CLASSIFICATIONS
Comparison of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses for CC Employees: 1st and 2nd Quarter 2017
1QTR 2QTR
• Two-thirds of M/S cases (12/18) occurred in Pharmacy.
• Eight M/S cases occurred in the new Intravenous Admixture Unit (IVAU)
• Total Recordable Cases (TRC) spiked with an increased number of Other Recordable Cases (ORC)
• Musculoskeletal trauma (M/S) without patient contact remains the most common OI
• Injuries in IVAU include repetitive motion injuries as well as body mechanics issues
• Hospital Safety and Occupational Medicine are working with IVAU staff to address ergonomic issues
![Page 32: Patient Safety Metrics](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051712/586cbd6c1a28ab114f8b6876/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
52%
30%
9%
9%
Types of Occupational Injuries Reported in 2nd Quarter 2017 n=34
M/S Trauma Wounds ERGO Other