patient safety in women’s health: view from the national observatory

48
Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory Prof James Walker Clinical Associate National Patient Safety Agency

Upload: zamora

Post on 12-Jan-2016

23 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory. Prof James Walker Clinical Associate National Patient Safety Agency. Background. The NPSA: was established July 2001 is a Special Health Authority - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Patient Safety in Women’s health:View from the National Observatory

Prof James Walker

Clinical Associate

National Patient Safety Agency

Page 2: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Background

The NPSA:• was established July 2001

• is a Special Health Authority

• has been created to co-ordinate efforts to identify and learn from patient safety incidents

Page 3: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Clinical Governance

Governance Developed: • An organisation with a memory, which looked at

learning from adverse incidents in the NHS; and • Building A Safer NHS for Patients, which set out the

government’s plans to address OWAM’s recommendations.

Page 4: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Why is patient safety important?

Page 5: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Medicine in the old days was simple, safe and ineffective.

Now it is complex, very effective but potentially dangerous

Sir Cyril Chantler,Chairman of the King's Fund Chairman of Board

GOSH

Page 6: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975

Source: General Register Office and OPCS, Reproduced in Birth counts, Table A10.1.3. Graph by Alison Macfarlane

Dea

ths

per

100,

000

tota

l birt

hs

Abortion and miscarriage

Prolonged labour, trauma and other causes

Toxaemia

Haemorrhage

Puerperal sepsis

Puerperal phlebitis, thrombosis and embolism

Maternal mortality by cause (E&W) 1935-78

Page 7: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Maternal Mortality in Iraq

Page 8: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Maternal Mortality in Iraq

• Massive Obstetric Haemorrhage 28%• Post Abortion 19%• Eclampsia 17%• Infection 15%• Post Anaesthetic and Other 14%• Obstructed Labour/Ruptured Uterus 7%

Page 9: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Obstetric Claims

• Obstetric claims account for over 70% of all NHS litigation expenses with an average cost of cerebral palsy cases of £1.5m.

• Current estimate that obstetric claims amount to £400m of total £600m projected NHS costs.

Source:

Learning from litigation: an analysis of claims for clinical negligence

Vincent, Davy, Esmail, Neale, Elstein, Cozens, Walshe

August 2004

Page 10: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

A problem in maternity services?

• Findings from root cause analyses of 37 adverse events/near misses in obstetrics (Ashcroft, 2002)– in 92% cases there no guidelines or protocols to advice on

clinical practice or organisational issues– 49% members of staff were unfamiliar with labour ward

protocols and failed to follow them

• CEMD report ‘Why mothers die 1997-1999’ highlighted need for guidelines to be used– “women are still dying of potentially treatable conditions

where the use of simple diagnostic guidelines may help”

Page 11: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Fire risk

Page 12: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

"First, Do No Harm"

• Most practitioners are caring individuals– Highly skilled– Highly trained

• But we still make mistakes• Usually in repetitive (normal) tasks

– Omission

• It is not usually the emergency

Page 13: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory
Page 14: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Problems for the Beaver

• Learn task but watching and doing– Trial and Error

• Learning ends with the accident– No audit trail of problems– No “system” memory

• No guideline development• Continued accidents• The system is inherently dangerous

Page 15: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Safety First

• Simplifying and encouraging reporting of safety incidents

• More rapid reporting and notification of serious incidents to the NPSA within 36 hours leading to more rapid learning

• Capturing risky situations • Using patient safety data to inform

learning and action locally – analysis, learning and feedback.

Safety First highlights key areas for improvement in current safety reporting systems in the NHS. These include:

Page 16: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Event Reporting

• Mainstay of risk management • Part of every-day practice• Within the airline industry

– routine error (near miss) reporting followed by root-cause analysis and risk management, has led to a 4 fold reduction in major airline incidents

Page 17: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Error Analysis

• The traditional way

– person approach

– individual involved is questioned

– the problem tackled at that level

• Tackling the individual

– does not remove the pre-existing risk of error

– the error trap

Page 18: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Person Approach

• "If a surgeon has made a deep incision in the body of a man with a lancet of bronze and saves the man's life, or has opened an abscess in the eye of a man and has saved his eye, he shall take 10 shekels of silver.

• If a surgeon has made a deep incision in the body of a man with his lancet of bronze and so destroys the man's eye, they shall cut off his hand”– Laws of Hammurabi, Babylon, BC 1792

Page 19: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Root-cause analysis of major airline events

• Failure to follow accepted procedures • Misinterpretation of instruments • Incorrect decisions • Ignoring advice from colleagues • Failure of team working • Equipment failure • Pilot error

Page 20: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Themes from systematic review of the data

• High proportion of incidents reported relate to Trust maternity ‘trigger list’ categories

• Following these the top five themes are: – Communication– Staffing levels– Medication– Equipment– Patient ID

Page 21: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Reason’s ‘Swiss cheese’ model

some holes dueto active failures

other holes due tolatent conditions

hazards

losses

defences. barriers and safeguardsJames Reason 1997

Page 22: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

System Approach

• Wider in its remit

– more open

– based on concept of system failures

– Different outcome for the individual

– more likely to produce solutions

• reduce the chance of recurrence.

• requires trusting environment

– a ‘no blame’ approach

Page 23: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Systems Approach

• More comprehensive covering

– The person

– Team

– Procedure

– Environment

– Organisation

Page 24: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Systems Approach

• Not

– ‘who made a mistake’

• but

– ‘how and why have the defences failed’

Page 25: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

“We can’t change the human condition, but we can change the conditions under which humans work”

James Reasons

Solution

Page 26: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Defences, barriers, and safeguards

• Technical– alarms, physical barriers, automatic shutdowns

• Human – doctors, midwives, administrators

• Documentation– guidelines, standard operating procedures

• Act to – prevent error– protect the patient

• Defences are mostly successful– but not infallible.

Page 27: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Safety

• Driving is safer– Design

• Speed limits• ABS

– Safety• Car design• Seat belts• Airbags

• We are not better drivers

Page 28: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Increasing the number of Barriers to prevent Patient Safety Incidents

Swiss Cheese

Cheddar Cheese

Page 29: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Guidelines

• Keep them simple• For routine things

• Use checklists

• Use audit of practice

Page 30: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Are they effective?

“The distribution of methodologically sound clinical guidance does not, however, ensure

implementation”

The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 2001, p93

Page 31: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Guidelines

• Too many• Too complicated

• End unto themselves• Job is done

• Not proven or validated

Page 32: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Yorkshire Guidelines

• Consensus guidelines– Obstetricians and Anaesthetists– All units in Yorkshire

• Commenced May 1997 • By 1999, all units using• Regional audit of cases

– Each hospital auditing own cases– Regional co-ordination– Collection of data

Page 33: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

0

5

10

15

20

25

To

tal

No of cases Stay over 24hours

Ventilated

1998

1999

2000

2001

ICU admissions in Yorkshire

Page 34: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Airline industry similar to medicine

• requires concentration – long periods of little activity– sudden emergencies – instant decision making

• team working which is interdependent

Page 35: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

In Medicine

• Experts often not present at time of crisis

• (a latent failure)

– be aware of the possibility of failure

– be prepared to recognise and recover

• Assess possible risks

– risk assessment

• Rehearsing familiar scenarios

– Drills

• Common sense training

Page 36: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Drills and Skills

• Teach basic skills– For all

• Multidisciplinary– Team working

• Update

Page 37: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Airline industry

• Guidelines for the routine• Check lists

• Drills for emergencies• Experience for the unusual

• If they make a mistake - they die too

Page 38: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Designing out faults

• Copied from industry

• Assess the environment leading to the event

• Design solutions

– Training/supervision

– Design equipment/Hospital

– Encourage change in behavior

• (Guidelines)

Page 39: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

a) periodically plot spillage area on an X-bar chart, look for special causes (audit)

b) double the size of the fixtures (prevent)

c) hire an attendant to monitor and reprimand “less hygienic” users (supervise)

d) Hand out guidelines on entry to toilet

what would you do?

Source: Wall Street Journal, used by John Grout,NPSA Seminar, 17 January 2003

JFK International terminal men’s restrooms

Page 40: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

e) etch the image of a fly on the porcelain - (Focus)

Source:Wall Street Journal, used by John Grout,

NPSA Seminar, 17 January 2003

JFK International terminal men’s restrooms

Page 41: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Drug Administration

Page 42: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Fully assess risk

• Past history• Woman’s understanding of the risk• Flagging of the problem• Notifying

– (warning/planning)• Guidelines

Page 43: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

What about Obesity?

• Increasing problem • Not allowed to talk about

it• We do not weigh people

any more• Ignore the problem• Wait for the disaster

Page 44: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Approach to Risk

You need to know: Min age is 12. Max weight is 16st. Min height is 4'11''. Unsuitable for pregnant women or anyone unable to climb up into the cockpit or fit in a standard car seat.

You need to know: Full manual driving licence required. As a guide max weight is 16st to 18st and you should be between 5'1'' and 6'4''.

Page 45: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Solution Development Processes

• Understanding the what, how and why• Identify potential solutions• Risk assess solutions• Pilot and learn • Implementation • Evaluation and impact assessment

Page 46: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

Where are we now?

• Guidelines to inform– Routine

• Checklists to focus– Prompts– Memory aids– Care Bundles

• Drills for skills– Regular – For all

• Audit trail – Prove what you do

Page 47: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory

We need to share the learning from our mistakes to try and stop them happening

again …..

Page 48: Patient Safety in Women’s health: View from the National Observatory