patent trolls in today's economy

14
NPE in today’s Patent economy Alexander Alduncin M.A. & Paola Buitron J.D.

Upload: pbuitron

Post on 11-Aug-2015

91 views

Category:

Law


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Patent Trolls in Today's economy

NPE in today’s Patent

economy Alexander Alduncin M.A. & Paola Buitron J.D.

Page 2: Patent Trolls in Today's economy

What is aPatent Troll?

Page 3: Patent Trolls in Today's economy

The term “patent troll” is usually reserved for those who acquire patents from inventors or

companies, and then sue operating companies for patent infringement.

Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.

Supreme Court, 1908. Established the principle that patent holders have no obligation to use

their patent.

Paola Buitron
Kenneth, already went through what is a patent troll and I would like to elaborate that a patent troll can be a
Page 4: Patent Trolls in Today's economy

S.1137Protecting American Talent and Entrepreneurship Act of 2015 

Page 5: Patent Trolls in Today's economy

Customer Stay

Large Loophole allows many manufactures to qualify as customer if they buy/import

components 

Customer Stay Provision

Allows a Court to stay a motion against a

retailer or end user that is accused of infringing

a patent or patents pending resolution against

the Manufacture.

Page 6: Patent Trolls in Today's economy

Why notProduct Liability?

Page 7: Patent Trolls in Today's economy

Product Liability refers to the obligations or duties of manufactures, other middleman, or retailers to

consumers, purchasers, users, and even bystanders when a product is found to be defective.

Under common law, Warranty Action is a theory under which a plaintiff could bring a suit for personal

injury or property damage caused by a defective product

Page 8: Patent Trolls in Today's economy

Decline in patent suit filings

NPE cases concentrated in certain district courts as 5 out of 94 district courts account for

42%

of all identified NPE decisions from 1995 to 2014 (p. 16)

Page 9: Patent Trolls in Today's economy

Data

• UGA Patent Litigation Datafile (Henry et al. 2013)

• All cases where District Court (DC) ruled invalid patent, valid but no infringe, or valid & infringe. No summary decisions, dismissals, etc

• Removed observations with no listed dates, missing data

• Divided into 2 subsets: 1929-2006 & 1991-2006

• Also incorporate Lex Machina & PWC summary reports on patent litigation, 2013-2015

Page 10: Patent Trolls in Today's economy

Premise #1Cases Decided Over Time

Page 11: Patent Trolls in Today's economy

Premise #2Repeat Litigators

Page 12: Patent Trolls in Today's economy

MLogit Regression Results

Page 13: Patent Trolls in Today's economy

Delaware District Court

Page 14: Patent Trolls in Today's economy

Future Steps

• Identify other important variables?

• Updated data for new trends- Sag (2014) dataset

• Incorporate premise 3 via regression if possible, or summary statistics otherwise

• Look at thrown out cases