passion and fruit.pdf

8/9/2019 passion and fruit.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/passion-and-fruitpdf 1/105

How to Master

Your Life

N.W. Passion



Contents

Acknowledgments 6

Preface 7

Introducon

!ogma

"t#molog#

Intelligence

Proof$"%idence

Learning

Is t&is a P&iloso'&#(

Master# is )W*&olisc

Pers'ec%e

+&a'ter ,- rut& / 0rigins ,1Pseudo23cience

&e 4rain

0rigins of t&e 5ni%erse

Intelligent !esign

Proteins

0rigins

&e !ark Ages

0rigins +ont.

+&a'ter - Natural Law 8

9ree2Will

Moralit#

ransgressions of Natural Law )Wrongdoings*

Moral +ul'a:ilit#

Natural Law %ersus Man;s Law

+onscience

<o%ernment / Natural Law

Moralit# 3u''orts 9reedom

&e Polical Answer for 9reedom

Natural Law "='ressions

0ur 0rigins and t&e Acce'tance of 3la%er#

~ 2 ~



In>nite Possi:ilit#

+&a'ter - W&o are You( ?

You are In>nite

W&at are You(

&e All

"nerg#@nowing Yourself / !istracons

4eing 3elf2is&

Wa#s to @now &#self

&e Num:er ,

+&a'ter 1- 5ni%ersal Laws 1

&e Law of Mentalism

&e Law of +orres'ondence

&e Law of i:raon

&e Law of Polarit#

&e Law of B&#t&m

&e Law of +ause and "Cect

&e Law of <ender

&e Law of <eneraon

&e ?t& 5ni%ersal Law(

+&a'ter D- +reate Your Bealit# D6

&e ri%ium

&oug&ts are &ings

Nega%e Mental Programing

4e Mindful of Your &oug&ts

Want

+onscious Mental Programming

Ins'iraon

Life Pur'ose

AconE 9ocus / Will'ower

@nowing

9ait&

!ou:t

~ 3 ~



9ailure

+&a'ter 6- !iet;s ACect on Fualit# of Life 6

W&# does e%er#t&ing :ad feel so good(

&e !angers of !air#

&e !angers of Animal Protein

+ardio%ascular !iseaseAcidosis

Protein

4usng t&e 4, M#t&

+orru'on in t&e Nutrional Arena

3u''ort from Nutrional GAut&ories

Im'acts of &e Animal Agriculture Industr#- Human and "n%ironmental

WaterE Land / Air

Human 3tar%aon

<rass29ed 4eef

&e 3oluon

+&a'ter 7- A !iet to "n&ance Progress 7

3'ecies 3'eci>c !iet

0ur 9rugi%orous Bela%es

5ni%ersal Law and 3uCering

&e 3#m:ioc Belaons&i' of Plants and Humans

W&at is eganism(

A H+L9 Plant2:ased Lifest#le

+alories

3ugar(

3tarc& is t&e 3ta'le of t&e WorldJs Healt&iest Po'ulaons

4ut +on%enonal Wisdom 3a#s +ar:s Make You 9at

Besults2:ased Kudgment

&e 3u'er>cialiat# of Weig&t2Loss

W&at A:out !ia:etes(

Are &ere <ood 9ats(

&e +alorie Batio

+&a'ter - Healt&E Wealt& / 3uccess ?,

~ 4 ~



9ind Wealt& in Healt&

Wealt&# is Not Bic&

W&at is 3uccess(

How !o I 3tart(

3lee'E WaterE 3ugar

9itness

3ta#ing H#drated and Low23odium

3lee'

!o W&at You Want

3c&ool;s Bole in 3uccess

9ollow Your Passion

A:out t&e Aut&or ,8,

"ducaonal Ins'iraons and ools to 3ucceed ,8

rut& and G0ccult @nowledge

!ietar# / 9itness Ad%ice for a Healt&# Lifest#le

egan 9ilmsE 3'eec&es / Info

4i:liogra'&# ,81

Cover Design: David Kong, Arcus Designs

Copy Editing: Lauren Andalora, Geek In Glasses

~ 5 ~



Acknowledgments

&is :ook would &a%e :een a lot more c&allenging to 'roduce wit&out t&e &el' and su''ort I recei%ed

from m# famil#. o 'ut it sim'l#E t&e# took care of me during t&e lengt&# wring 'rocess. &ese 'eo'le

made sure I was taken care of enoug& to focus as muc& aenon as I 'leased on t&is :ook. I would like

to s'eciall# t&ank m# mot&erE fat&erE and grandmot&er for t&eir tremendous su''ort wit&out #ouE I sll

would &a%e found a wa# to get t&is :ook wrienE :ut it would &a%e :een muc& more c&allenging and

t&ere;s no telling &ow long it would &a%e taken. I also gi%e t&anks to m# animal friends for t&e

uncondional lo%e t&e# &a%e s&own me during mes of stress and worr#. I t&ank m#self I e='ress

gratude to t&e 'ower wit&in me t&at lead me to com'lete it. I s&ow a''reciaon to nature for t&e lo%e

and :eaut# it &as s&own me w&ic& ins'ired me to com'lete t&is :ook. 9inall#E I must t&ank t&e readerE

for wit&out #ouE t&is informaon would go unnoced.

~ 6 ~



Preface

I would like to state t&at t&is :ook is intended to ser%e all forms of life. &is :ook was created out of

'ur'oseE 'assionE dut#E desireE con%iconE and lo%e. &is :ook is 'art of m# lifeJs work and w&at some

ma# call m# lifeJs 'ur'ose. M# intenon and goal is to s'read certain trut&s I &a%e :ecome aware ofE and

ideas t&at will 'osi%el# inuence all life to t&e :est of m# knowledge.

&e maOor t&eme of t&is :ook are met&ods an indi%idual can ulie to take more control o%er &er or &is

life. It is :ased oC m# own struggles and Oourne# to take control of m# life. I &a%e e='erienced t&e

feelings t&at arise w&en #ou are not li%ing t&e life #ou want to li%e. W&en #ou feel #ou are li%ing #our life

for some:od# else or Gmaking a li%ing Oust to sur%i%eE it is sing. &is is not &ow weE as a s'eciesE were

meant to li%e. &is is sla%er#E not in a '&#sical senseE :ut a newE more discreet form in modern mes.

"=isng and not li%ingE Gnot creangE is damaging to us on man# le%els. We are &ere to create and enOo#

doing an#t&ing :esides t&is leads to stressE angerE de'ressionE and a &ost of ot&er nega%e and

destruc%e emoons. It saddens me t&at I saw m#self 'ass t&roug& t&is low state of e=istence and low

le%el of consciousnessE and I &a%e seen ot&ers go t&roug& it also. 3omemes control ma# seem out of

our &andsE and w&en it isE I call t&at fate.

W&en fate &a''ensE t&ere is not&ing t&at we can do to c&ange fate;s doings aQer t&e# &a%e occurredE

:ut I now know t&at fate is not #our desn#. An# indi%idual can rise out of a disagreea:le situaon if t&e#

trul# want toE and t&at is a :ene>cial 'iece of knowledge t&at I oCer to &umanit# :# wring t&is :ook.

All it takes to clim: out of t&e &ellis& 'it #ou are in is t&e )want* and t&e care. Am:ion is #our greatest

asset w&en it comes to accom'lis&ing somet&ing. Am:ion is t&at :urning >re wit&in us allE gi%ing us t&e

a:ilit# to make our dreams a realit#. 3ome of us &a%e lost t&at >re and gi%en u'. &e worldE certain

circumstancesE and 'arcular e%ents can &a%e t&at eCect on some 'eo'le. 9or t&e 'eo'le w&ose >re is

a:out to die outE I reall# &o'e t&at t&is :ook will &el' ins'ire #ou to kee' going and not :ecome anot&er%icm.

I am also wring t&is :ook for m#self. I came u' wit& t&e idea to 'ut all t&e knowledge and trut& I know

into words. I feelE w&en I doE t&at it will ser%e me :eerE and t&at it can :e used to ser%e ot&ers. W&en

t&oug&ts are fragmented t&e# lose t&eir 'ower. Wring t&is :ook :egan to form and mold t&ese

fragmented t&oug&ts into a singleE uni>ed ent#. &is creaon &as t&e 'ower to start a maOor c&ange in

m# lifeE t&e li%es of ot&ersE and t&e 'lanet as a w&ole. &is is m# missionE and I trust it will :e :ene>cial

and successful for all.

~ 7 ~



Introduction

Here;s an interesng stor# on &ow I 'icked t&e tle GHow to Master Your Life. M# %ision was for t&is to

:e a :ook like t&e kind #ou would see in t&e self2&el' secon in G4arnes / No:le;s. YetE t&is :ook is also

e=tremel# uniRue. It is a self2&el' :ookE :ut it is constructed to &el' t&e aggregate S t&at isE &umanit# as

a w&oleE and all life on t&e 'lanet. I &a%e learned t&roug&out m# life e='eriences t&at in order to &el'

ot&ersE #ou must &el' #ourself and :# &el'ing ot&ersE #ou will also &el' #ourself. &is :eaufulE dualisc

relaons&i' is a model for t&is :ook. 3elf2&el' t&en :ecomes a s#m:ioc relaons&i' :etween ot&ers

and #ourself.

In t&e 'rocess of wring t&is :ookE man# 'eo'le &a%e asked me S and fairl# enoug& S if I &a%e mastered

m# own life. W&# would an#one :u# a :ook tled GHow to Master Your Life if t&e aut&or &asnJt e%en

mastered &is own( I c&allenge t&e reader to consider t&ese Ruesons- W&at is life master#( Has an#one

ali%e trul# mastered t&eir life( o :ecome greatnessE #ou must use greatness as #our guide. &ereforeE

master# is not a set goal to :e ac&ie%ed and forgoenE :ut a 'rocess. In t&is wa#E m# 'osion diCers from

w&at Gcommon knowledge or mainstream consciousness considers master# to :e. I assert t&at t&ere is

no certain 'oint in #our e='erience w&ic& #ou must reac& :efore #ou can start e=&i:ing master#.

Mastering #our life starts wit& e%oluon.

Master# is not some elusi%e or esoteric t&ing t&at is nearl# im'ossi:le to ac&ie%e. &e a:ilit# to master

our li%es rests inside all of usE onl# waing to :e awoken. &e willingness to e%ol%e is all #ou need. &enE

m# friendE #ou are mastering #our life t&roug& eac& of #our e='eriencesE w&ic& is master# in and of itself.

&e 'rocess :ecomes t&e as'iraon. &e Oourne# is t&e desnaon. Mastering is master#. W&en #ou

follow #ou &eart and t&e trut&E t&en #ou will trul# ne%er fail again.

Dogma

!ogma is t&e single most 'owerful ent# t&at can destro# an# c&ance at im'ro%ing #our life. o im'ro%e

in&erentl# means to c&angeE w&ereas dogma means to &old a strict '&iloso'&#. 4# de>nion t&e# are

o''osing forces w&ic& necessaril# neutralie eac& ot&er t&ereforeE c&ange and dogma cannot coincide.

A:iding :# a 'arcular dogma is e=tremel# liming to an indi%idual;s a:ilit# to c&ange t&eir t&oug&tsE

w&ic& decimates t&eir a:ilit# to c&ange t&eir acons. !ogma is- a set of 'rinci'les laid down :# an

aut&orit# as incontro%er:l# true. In t&is wa#E dogma means to not RuesonE and to not dou:t #our

current 'ers'ec%e of realit# or :eliefs. &is is onl# conduci%e to sta#ing in t&e same 'lace #ouJ%e alwa#s

:eenE :ut if #ou c&oose to c&ange t&at S w&ic& is w&# I &o'e #ouJre reading t&is :ook S t&en #ou must

:e a:le to c&ange #our 'ers'ec%e.

4elief can :e dou:ted and must :e dou:tedE :ecause fait& is e%en more 'owerful t&an :elief. YesE fait&

includes :eliefE :ut t&e onl# wa# to strengt&en fait& is to dou:t w&at #ou &a%e :een told or t&ink to :e

true. o strengt&en an#t&ingE t&ere must :e an o''osing force going against it. &is is w&ere angels and

demons come in. &e demon is actuall# an o''osing force and will strengt&en #ou if #ou donJt let it

~ 8 ~



o%ercome #ou. &e c&allenges in oneJs life are w&at I like to call Gdemons. &e c&allenges &el' us to

growE and wit&out t&emE we could not e%ol%e. As t&e# sa#E w&at doesnJt kill #ou makes #ou stronger.

An enem# to dogma is an o'en mindE and dogmaJs :est friend is a closed one. 9or t&is :ook to &el' #ouE

#ou must &a%e an o'en mind to e%er#t&ing t&at is 'resented &ereE e%en if #ou donJt agree at >rst. 9or

wit&out an o'en mindE dogma will t&ri%eE c&ange will not occurE and aem'ts to im'ro%e #our life will

fail or occur muc& more slowl# t&an desired.

Beligion is deri%ed from t&e Lan %er: religareE meaning Gto e :ack to &old :ack to t&wart from

forward 'rogress to :ind. Beligion &olds one :ack from t&e forward 'rogress of consciousness :#

demanding dogmac :elief from its followers itJs a s#stem of control rooted in unc&allenged 'rinci'les.

Anot&er connotaon of t&e word religion means to Greunite wit&. In t&is wa# religion need not :e a

nega%e ent#. &e onl# religion to follow is Gtrut&. Make trut& #our religion and #ou can;t :e misled.

Beligion includes dogmaE :ut t&atJs not to sa# #ou must :e a dogmac 'erson if #ou engage or take 'art

in religion. Beligion was originall# meant to guide 'eo'le unaware of t&eir own di%init# to t&eir own

&ig&er sel%es. W&ile dogma is usuall# associated strictl# wit& religionE dogma can :e more t&an religion.

All t&at must e=ist for dogma to :e 'resent is a :elief or o'inion t&at one is not willing to c&ange no

maer t&e e%idence or circumstances. &is mental en%ironment st#mies self2im'ro%ement andrealiaon of t&e trut&. Luckil#E dogma is literall# t&e Lan word for o'inionE and o'inions can c&ange.

Beligion is a :eginnerJs le%el 'racce in s'iritual e%oluon- it can guide a 'erson if t&e# donJt take it

literall# and are a:le to e=tract t&e carefull# orc&estrated knowledge :urrowed wit&in religious te=ts.

&ere are codes t&at one must learn to decodeE so t&at one can e='erience t&e full :ene>t of w&at

religion &as to oCer. 4# decoding #ou are not necessaril# GreligiousE :ut are on t&e 'at& of knowledgeE

trut&E and wisdom. It is recommended to :e a decoder of religion if #ou wis& to use it as a guide. !ecode

it like #ou would a :eauful 'oem or a m#t&ological stor#. Poems and m#t&olog# usuall# arenJt meant to

:e taken literall#E :ut to :e deconstructed and studied like a '&iloso'&er. Howe%erE it is acknowledged

t&at t&ere are some real &istoricalE literal accounts in religious te=tsE :ut t&e# are usuall# few and far:etween.

AgainE religious dogma will greatl# &inder #our e%oluonar# 'rocess. &is cannot :e em'&asied enoug&.

It is recommended to stud# knowledge em:edded in religionE :ut 'lease do not stud# onl# oneE :ut

man# or all. A )w*&olisitc stud#E or wa# of going a:out somet&ing t&at encom'asses a :road or t&oroug&

area of o:ser%aon and 'erce'onE will rea' #ou a )w&ole* understanding. &is le%el of understanding is

'aramount to im'ro%ing #our life circumstances.

Etymology

"t#molog#E or t&e stud# of t&e origins of wordsE will :e a met&od of de>ning some ke# terms t&roug&out

t&is :ook. &e truest meaning of a word is deri%ed from t&e meaning of t&e origin of t&e word. &e

meanings of man# words &a%e :een tam'ered wit& t&roug&out &istor#. 3ome words &a%e :een c&anged

so muc& t&at t&e# mean t&e e=act o''osite of w&at was originall# meant. akeE for e=am'leE t&e word

Gnice.

~ 9 ~



)Nice* Modern de>nion- 'leasing agreea:le delig&Tul

)Nice* "t#molog# and origin-

,D8S,88 Middle "nglis&- foolis&E stu'id U 0ld 9renc&- sill#E sim'le U Lan nescius ignorantE inca'a:leE

eRui%alent to ne2 nega%e 're>= V sci2 )stem of scre to know see science* V 2us adO. suX=

&e 'oint of s&owing #ou t&is is to demonstrate &ow :ackwards and :astardied t&e "nglis& language

&as :ecome. &ereforeE et#molog# will :e used to 'ro'erl# and correctl# con%e# 'arcular meanings.

As t&e great '&iloso'&er Ludwig Wigenstein saidE Gt&e limits of m# language mean t&e limits of m#

world.

Intelligence

Intelligence is not solel# constuted of a scien>c or intellectual mind. It is deri%ed from t&e Lan word

intelli E meaning GintellectE and t&e Lan word genereE meaning Gto create or t&e crea%e as'ect of our

'ersonalit#. &e crea%e as'ect of our 'ersonalit# also includes t&e facules of intuion and fait&. It isE in

factE im'ossi:le to e=em'lif# intelligence :# Oust using t&e intellectual mind. rue intelligence is found in

t&e :alance of one;s intellectual mind wit& t&e intui%e and crea%e mind.

Proof/Evidence

W&at constutes as 'roof or e%idence for t&at w&ic& is said in t&is :ook( Not&ing. Bealit# must :e

acce'ted on an indi%idual :asis. Man# indi%iduals will onl# acce't t&at w&ic& t&e# can o:ser%e and

'ersonall# e='erience. If t&e trut& is stated and t&e e%idence is t&ereE it means not&ing if one can;t

'ercei%e t&e e%idence for w&at it isE so as to register it in &is$&er mind as trut&. All uni%ersal trut&s can

ne%er c&angeE :ut t&e# will not :ecome trut&s in t&e mind of a 'erson unless t&at indi%idual acce'ts

t&em as trut&s. 9or e=am'le- It;s a trut& t&at we need o=#gen to :reat&eE :ut one ma# c&oose not to

acce't t&at as a trut&. If t&is indi%idual goes for a long di%e wit&out an o=#gen tankE t&en t&e# will :e

forced to come :ack u' for air. If t&e stu::orn di%er takes an o=#gen tank :efore returning to t&e de't&s

of t&e sea and can now :reat&eE t&en &e will realie it is a trut& t&at we need o=#gen. It is onl# :ecause

of &is direct 'ersonal e='erience t&at &e &as acce'ted t&e trut&. He ma# &a%e de:ated logical fact at>rstE :ut now &e cannot Rueson t&at we all need to :reat&e in o=#gen to sur%i%e. &e most ske'cal

minds are usuall# onl# con%inced t&roug& 'ersonal e='erience t&at seemingl# forces u'on t&em to learn

t&e trut&.

&is :ook is not 'urel# scien>c in t&e sense t&at not all claims are :acked2u' wit& 'eer2re%iewedE

scien>c Oournals or arcles. Man# of t&e claims 'resented wit&in are :ased in scien>c 'rinci'lesE

~ 10 ~



&owe%erE t&ere are some conce'ts t&at ma# not lie wit&in t&e :oundaries of o:ser%a:le science. 9or

t&oseE intuion s&ould :e ulied. Intuion is a knowledge source in and of itselfE and is o:ser%a:le

t&roug& one;s own feeling. 3cience can t&en :e used to test if t&e feeling ma# :e true :ut man# mes

we can;t know somet&ing for sure. If we feel somet&ing is correct and :ased in trut&E t&ere is good

reason to take note of t&at feeling and not disregard it. You can also test %alidit# t&roug& 'ersonal

e='erience and o:ser%aon in t&is regard. It is 'ossi:le to maintain or 'erform t&e scien>c met&od on

#ourself and #our own e='eriencesE as well. A good e=am'le is tesng t&e eCects of diet on '&#sical

'erformance.

Learning

A 'erson t&at is enrel# ske'cal creates an en%ironment w&ic& is non2conduci%e to learning. 0n t&e

o''osite end of t&e s'ectrumE a 'erson t&at is enrel# acce'ng or na%e is not in a 'ro'er en%ironment

to learn eit&er. &e most 'rofound learning en%ironment resides in t&e :alance :etween t&ese 'olesE

w&ere one is as eRuall# ske'cal and acce'ng of new informaon.

In a senseE fait& is reRuired to trul# learnE :ecause new informaon would go in one ear and out t&e

ot&er in instances w&ere indis'uta:le e%idence was not :e 'resent in t&e moment. 4lind fait& is

dogmac and relates to a closed mindE :ut it;s im'ortant to &a%e Gconstruc%e fait&E or t&e mind state

w&ere #ou;re a:le to &old new informaon in #our mind w&ile not full# acce'ng it or disregarding it.

Howe%erE &olding onto t&at informaon alone is not enoug& it must :e tested t&roug& #our own

o:ser%aon and e='erimentaon to e%entuall# know or consciousl# decide if it as a trut& or not. &is is

es'eciall# im'ortant if #ou &a%e a gut or intui%e feeling t&at somet&ing ma# :e true. Intuion acts as a

guideE :ut if #ou don;t want to end u' lostE t&en #ou s&ould sll o:ser%e w&ere #ou are instead of using

:lind fait& as #our guide.

GIt is t&e mark of an educated mind to :e a:le to entertain a t&oug&t wit&out acce'ng it. 2 Aristotle

Is this a Philosophy

NoE not reall#. P&iloso'&# is t&e lo%e of wisdomE :ut also a searc& on a grand scale for t&e seemingl#

unanswera:le Ruesons of life. Man# trut&s are claimed to :e known and 'ro%ided t&roug&out t&is

:ookE so t&e 'riorit# is not a:out '&iloso'&iing. &e 'riorit# is re%ealing t&e trut&s t&at I &a%e :ecome

aware of t&roug& m# Oourne# and stud#.

&is :ook was wrien to ser%e t&e trut& :ut I am sll on t&e in>nite 'rocess of learningE so I do not

claim to know all uni%ersal knowledge and trut&s. How can one mortal man know all trut&( An# :ook or

an#one w&om claims to know t&e full trut& is :ased u'on dece'on. &ere areE &owe%erE man# trut&s

t&at are known and t&at will delineated from somet&ing t&at onl# ma# :e true. M# goal isnJt to &a%e

followers of t&ese teac&ingsE :ut to &a%e it so t&at 'eo'le can learn a great deal from it. I &a%e learned a

~ 11 ~



great deal o%er t&e #ears and &a%e taken t&ings from man# diCerent '&iloso'&ies and tediousl# found

t&e trut&s :uried wit&in eac&.

I donJt categorie m#self as a '&iloso'&er S alt&oug& I am a lo%er of wisdomE w&ic& is t&e literal

de>nion of w&at a '&iloso'&er is S :ut I &a%e generall# gat&ered wisdom from '&iloso'&#E scienceE

religionE s'iritualit#E t&e occultE and certain indi%iduals. I did t&is in order to come u' wit& a wa# of life

:ased in trut&. I &a%e sim'l# molded all t&is di%erse knowledge into one ent# I refer to as trut& IJ%e

molded it into a singleE sim'leE and uni>ed w&ole. As t&e sa#ing goesE GNot&ing is new under t&e sun.

&is :ook e='ounds on t&e wisdom of man# to create Gteac&ingsE and was constructed :# taking Oewels

from diCerent 'ers'ec%es and :ringing t&em toget&er to s&are a treasure of incessant a:undance. 0ne

t&at is eit&er t&e trut& or t&e closest to t&e trut&.

I would also like to state t&at I am sll a student m#self. M# own 'ersonal 'erce'ons are constantl#

e%ol%ingE as s&ould #ours. Not an# one 'erson ali%e knows e%er#t&ing. +onstantl# learning is one of t&e

ke#s to life master# :ecause c&ange is t&e onl# constant.

3ome of #ou w&o are ade't in stud#ing religionE s'iritualit#E '&iloso'&#E t&e occultE or science will see

t&e 're%ious source of some of w&at t&is :ook e='lains. In actualit#E all knowledge is no oneJs to claim.

All knowledge e=ists t&roug&out t&e uni%erse and is onl# waing to :e disco%ered. &is is not occulsm

as w&at man# ma# %iew it as. &e root meaning of occult is G&iddenE :ut no knowledge is trul# &idden. It

is 'art of t&is :ookJs 'romise to :ring some of t&ese so called Goccult trut&s to lig&t. I am not t&e onl#

source of t&is informaonE so I do not claim to &a%e t&e onl# ke# to t&e mastering of oneJs life. W&at I do

claim to &a%e in t&is :ook is a certain 'ers'ec%e a uniRue 'ers'ec%e. Here is w&at I im'lore #ou to do

if #ou &a%enJt alread#- &a%e #our own 'ers'ec%e. @ee' it in line wit& t&e trut& to t&e :est of #our a:ilit#

:ecause trut& is t&e ulmate realit#. Wisdom trul# unfolds w&en one is a:le to take :its and 'ieces of

knowledge from diCerent sources and com:ine t&emE and t&en act u'on t&is knowledge for t&e :ene>t

of all.

!astery is "#$holistic

Master# must >rst come in t&e mind :efore it can :e e='ressed an#w&ere else. &is mental master# is

a:solutel# )w*&olisc :ecause t&ere are man# 'at&wa#s to strengt&en t&e mindE and t&ere are also man#

'at&wa#s t&at lead to its weakness. &ere is not Oust Gone 'at& t&at can kee' t&e mind funconing at its

o'mum 'otenalE and t&e true is same for its detriment. &e 'at&wa#s will :e e='lained in furt&er

su:secons of t&is c&a'terE :ut to gi%e an e=am'leE t&ink a:out t&e funconing of a car. A car is not

going funcon at its o'mum ca'acit# for long if t&e onl# as'ect t&e dri%er takes care of is 'uZng gas int&e car. &ere are man# ot&er factors t&at constute &ow well a car runs- t&e re 'ressureE re

alignmentE transmissionE oilE ot&er engine uidsE and so on. o kee' t&e car running at 'eak

'erformanceE t&e mec&anic)s* doing t&e tune u' needs to make sure all of t&ese factors are running

smoot&l#. If notE t&e mec&anic needs to to' oC t&e re 'ressureE >= t&e uid le%elsE correct t&e

alignmentE c&ange t&e oilE and so fort&. If somet&ing is going wrong wit& t&e carE we canJt Oust >ll u' t&e

gas tank and e='ect to sol%e t&e 'ro:lem)s* t&at would :e an un2)w*&olisc or reduconist wa# of

~ 12 ~



%iewing t&e 'ro:lem. &e reduconist a''roac& usuall# looks at t&e eCects and negates t&e underl#ing

causes. W&en taking a )w*&olisc a''roac&E all as'ects must :e considered. )W*&olisc is wrien t&is

wa# :ecause it :eer em'&asies t&e im'ortance of w&oleness.

+onsider a 'erson wit& acne- 'uZng medicated cream on t&e face to su''ress t&e s#m'toms does

not&ing to remed# t&e cause. &is a''roac& is not )w*&olisc. We now know acne is t#'icall# diet2

relatedE w&ic& is linked to &ormone 'roducon. &e causes for t&e e=ternal eCects )acne* are locatedwit&in t&e indi%idualJs :od#. &e food t&e# 'ut into t&eir :od# and &ow t&eir &ormones are reacng

inside t&eir :od#. &e skin is t&e largest organ and is a great com'ass for telling us w&at is going on

internall#. If we don;t a''roac& t&e treatment of acne )w*&oliscall#E t&en alle%iang t&e suCer will :e a

lost cause. It;s referred to as a lost cause :ecause t&e cause isn;t known or acknowledged. &e cause

can;t :e 'ercei%ed :ecause one is not looking at t&e :igger 'icture.

&e )w*&olisc a''roac& s&ould :e a''lied w&en tackling all c&allenges in our li%es. W&en somet&ing

goes wrong we cannot onl# focus on one as'ect or Oust t&e eCect. We need to >nd out t&e underl#ing

'ro:lem. W&en t&ere is a 'ro:lemE it t#'icall# encom'asses mul'le as'ects of an indi%idual;s lifeE

w&ic& ma# seem o%erw&elmingE :ut t&is is actuall# 'osi%e. +onsider t&is- w&en one :ig 'ro:lem in an

indi%idual;s life is resol%edE man# ot&er 'ro:lems seem to %anis& simultaneousl#. o :ring :ack m# car

analog#- c&anging t&e oil will not onl# sto' t&e engine from knockingE :ut gi%e t&e car a :eer gas

mileage and 'erformance in most cases.

Perspective

Pers'ec%e 'la#s a large role in seeing a 'ro:lem for w&at it trul# is w&en we do t&isE we &a%e t&e :est

odds for sol%ing t&e 'ro:lem. +&anging our 'ers'ec%e can;t c&ange t&e trut&E :ut it can c&ange &ow we

feel a:out our realit#E and actuall# &el' us to :eer see t&e trut&. Alwa#s looking at t&ings linearl# can

cause us to feel like we are stuck and in t&e eCect stage wit&out an# a:ilit# to resol%e t&e cause. &e

narrow mind misses t&e :igger 'icture. If we em:race a )w*&olisc %iew of our e='erienceE t&en we can

see t&e full 'icture. 3omemes we need to rise a:o%e our 'ro:lems to get a :eer %iew of w&at;s reall#

going on and t&e ste's we can take to o%ercome c&allenges. As #ou read t&is :ookE #ou will de%elo' a

more )w*&olisc %iew and learn some trut&s w&ic& will &el' #ou resol%e an# issues t&at arise in #our life.

~ 13 ~



Chapter %: &ruth ' (rigins

In order to li%e a life of &armon#E )rut&* must :e #our guiding 'rinci'le :efore all ot&ers. Wit&out trut&E

life is fake. It is a waste to li%e a lie. o a%oid t&isE t&e trut& must :e disnguis&ed from lies. I will carefull#

e='lain trut& so t&at #ou can understand it full# and unlock t&e a:ilit# to trul# learn. Learning :ecomes

interru'ted w&en one confuses trut&s wit& untrut&sE making understanding c&aoc. All trut& isn;t

known :# one )wo*man consciousl#E :ut it is 'ossi:le to trut&full# know somet&ingE :ecause t&e trut& iso:Oec%e and immuta:le.

You ma# remem:er earlier t&at I said c&ange is t&e onl# constant and ask w&#E t&enE is t&e trut&

o:Oec%e and not su:Oect to c&ange( 4ecause trut& 'ro'agates c&ange and constant c&ange is trut&.

Howe%erE t&e trut& itself doesn;t c&ange. &e trut& is similar to water. Water is ed u' in a c#cle of

constant c&angeE #et it retains its true nature. Alt&oug& it ma# :e froen like ice or liRuid like rainE it is

alwa#s water- a single o=#gen atom co%alentl# :onded :etween two &#drogen atomsE H202H. It is a

'owerful force t&atE e%en w&en distorted into a su:stance suc& as steamE will alwa#s return to its true

form.

&e :iggest 'iece of misinformaon and most destruc%e idea :eing tossed around collec%e

consciousness is t&at o:Oec%e trut& does not e=ist. &is is furt&est from t&e trut& rut& is eternal.

Man# 'eo'le don;t want to acce't t&is :ecause it interferes wit& ego. &e idea t&at trut& is a:solute is

oQen greatl# feared wit&in an# )wo*man. &e ego &ates de>nite realiesE :lanket statementsE and

o:Oec%it#. rut& is :elligerentE rut&lessE and merciless :# its %er# natureE :ecause it is at war wit&

dece'onE liesE and mind control. 9urt&ermoreE w&en t&e trut& is known it 'laces one in a 'osion of

res'onsi:ilit#. &is is w&# man# do not want to acce't t&at trut& is o:Oec%e and cannot :e c&anged it

t&en :ecomes a res'onsi:ilit# t&at most do not want to undertake.

+ertain acknowledged trut&sE suc& as '&#sical lawsE are agreed u'on. &e# will e=ist for as long as t&e

uni%erse e=ists it can :e said wit& suret# t&at t&e eCects of gra%it# will &a%e t&e same eCects in t&e

future. Howe%erE w&en it comes to t&ings we can do t&at aren;t limited :# t&e laws of natureE t&en trut&

can onl# e=ist in t&e 'ast and t&e 'resentE not in t&e future. 9or e=am'le- it is true t&at car accidents

&a%e occurred and do occurE &owe%erE it is not true to sa# t&at #ou will get in a car accident in t&e future

no maer &ow likel# it is to &a''en. 3tascs like calculaon of 'ro:a:ilit# can :e used to 'redictE :ut

t&at is all. 3tascs are not t&e eRui%alent of trut&E and t&erefore 'ro%ide no re'ort of desn# or de>nite

realit#. 9ate is w&at G&as and Gis &a''ening fate is ne%er w&at is Ggoing to &a''en. W&at is going to

&a''enE outside of '&#sical lawsE is su:Oect wit&out constraint. W&at is going to &a''en is desn#E w&ic&

is determined t&roug& our c&oices and acons.

&e idea of rela%isc trut& and morals is t&e :asis for all e%il. W&en we :elie%e t&ere is no o:Oec%e

rig&t or wrongE no o:Oec%e incorrect or correctE and no o:Oec%e trut& or lieE t&en we :elie%e t&ese

t&ings are 'urel# constructs originang in t&e &uman mind. If we :elie%e eac& indi%idual is t&e ar:iter of

w&at is moral and w&at is trut&E t&en t&is will :e used for Ous>caon on one;s 'at& of engaging in

immoral acts. Peo'le are t&en allowed to :elie%e t&e# can [create[ rig&ts in t&eir mindsE e%en t&oug&

rig&ts cannot :e created :ecause t&e#;re alread# in&erent in nature. &e idea of moral rela%ism needs

to :e a:olis&ed from t&e minds of t&e 'eo'leE so t&e# can :egin to li%e in &armon# wit& nature andE

~ 14 ~



conseRuenall#E &a%e a &ig& Rualit# and more enOo#a:le life.

&e idea of moral rela%ism and su:Oec%e trut& is :ased in t&e religion of 3atanism. 3atanists :elie%e

t&at all morals and %alues are &uman construcons. It is one of t&eir main tenetsE alongside feeding all

self2centered desires or ego 'leasures. &e 3atanic religion was not :roug&t u' :ecause I;m a +&risan or

a 'art of anot&er GsacredE religion. GIE t&e aut&orE do not classif# m#self as religious :ecause I don;t

wors&i' or follow an# religion. 3atanism was not :roug&t u' to %ilif# and demonie it. It was :roug&t u'

:ecause moral rela%ism is most likel# t&e :eginning 'oint on t&e 'at& to following t&is religion.

3atanists claim to :e at&eistsE :ut t&e#;re dogmac in t&eir world%iewE so t&e# are religious in realit#

)religionE in summar#E includes dogma*. Man# 'eo'le &a%e a 3atanic :elief s#stem and don;t e%en know

it. &e religion &as :een 'ro'agated t&roug&out societ# for some me now. 3atanists also :elie%e in

social !arwinism or eugenics. &is is a '&iloso'&# t&at ad%ocates t&e im'ro%ement of t&e &uman gene

'ool t&roug& ar>cial selecon and coerced mang or a:snence. 4# remo%ing certain indi%idual;s

re'roduc%e a:iliesE less desira:le genecs will not :e 'assed on and t&erefore reduce o%er me. Fuite

sim'l#E it is sa#ing- let t&e weak 'eris& and let t&e strong rule. "ugenics was t&e main Ous>caon :e&ind

t&e Kewis& Holocaust and man# ot&er genocides. It is im'ossi:le to :elie%e in eugenics if #ou are a moral

a:solust. 0ne must :e a moral rela%ist to acce't eugenics into t&eir :elief s#stem. &e 3atanic religion

and ot&er dark occult orders :elie%e 'ersonal sur%i%alE moral rela%ismE and eugenics s&ould :e our

guiding 'rinci'les. It doesn;t maer w&om one %iolates and causes &arm to w&en sur%i%ingE seeking

'leasureE or leZng t&e strong rule :ecause moralit# is rela%e in t&eir minds. 3atanists use moral

rela%ism to Ousf# &orri>c acts for w&at t&e# deem is t&e greater good.

It is e=tremel# im'ortant to 'oint out t&e destruc%e and erroneous nature of t&is line of t&inking.

0:Oec%e rig&t and wrong do e=ist t&e# e=ist in&erentl# in natureE and t&is is a maOor 'remise of natural

law or moral law.

Pseudoscience

PseudoscienceE or Gfalse scienceE doesn;t mean t&at a conce't is erroneous or wit&out merit :ut rat&er

t&at it &as not :een o:ser%ed wit&in t&e realms of t&e scien>c met&odE as of #et. 0ne suc& e=am'le of

t&is is t&e conce't of a rig&t2 and leQ2:rain dic&otom#E an idea well2known :# t&e general 'u:lic. &is

conce't deri%es from and is acce'ted in t&e >eld of 's#c&olog#E :ut it is considered 'seudoscience :#

t&e strict scien>c communit#.

&ere &as :een de:ate as to w&et&er t&e informaon on t&e rig&t$leQ2:rain dic&otom# is wit&out

su:stance and totall# incorrect. &e 'ossi:ilit# t&at it is false ma# :e t&ereE :ut t&e conce't &as

rele%ance to t&e &uman 's#c&eE and can :e t&oroug&l# e='lained t&roug& t&e following e='lanaon. &e

main 'remise t&at s&ould :e con%e#ed is t&at consciousness &as a dual natureE and can :e eit&er in

:alance or a state of im:alance. Im:alances in eit&er direcon result in mental sickness.

It is acknowledged t&at t&e literal rig&t &emis'&ere of t&e :rain isn;t res'onsi:le for a certain set of

emoonsE nor is t&e literal leQ &emis'&ere. Neuroscience sll &as a long wa# to go in understanding

consciousnessE and it ma# ne%er full# com're&end it. +onsciousness is t&e most elusi%e su:Oect t&at

~ 15 ~



man;s science can stud#. Argua:l# it is somet&ing t&at we cannot stud# full# wit& our current

mainstream met&od of materialisc science :ecause certain Ge%idence leads us to :elie%e

consciousness is trul# immaterial. It would :e arrogant and incorrect to make a con>dent claim t&at

current neuroscience &as a good &old on &uman consciousness. &ereforeE t&e 's#c&ological conce't of

rig&t and leQ2:rain is used in conOuncon wit& our knowledge of certain :rain 'arts and funcon to :est

con%e# t&e :asic conce't of t&e &uman 's#c&e.

&he )rain

It is essenal t&at we understand &ow im'ortant :alance :etween t&e leQ and rig&t &emis'&eres of t&e

:rain is for &ig& Rualit# of &uman funconing. &e two &emis'&eres are wit&in t&e Neo2corte=$tera

nece'&alon$gre# maer 'oron of t&e :rain. &is is t&e 'art t&at sciensts refer to as t&e &uman :rainE

and w&at disnguis&es us from non2&uman animals. &e ot&er 'arts of t&e :rain are t&e B2+om'le= or

Gre'lian :rainE w&ic& 'ro%ides us wit& autonomic )t&oug&tless* funcons like :reat&ingE our :asic

motor funconsE ree=es to smuliE and sur%i%al res'onses like >g&t or ig&t. Lastl#E we &a%e t&e lim:ic

:rain or t&e Gmammalian :rainE w&ic& is res'onsi:le for emoon to :e e='erienced in our '&#siolog#.

&e Neo2corte= contains two &emis'&eres w&ic& are oQen referred to as t&e leQ2:rain and rig&t2:rain.

&e nature of t&e leQ :rain is 'urel# intellectual and is res'onsi:le for logicE anal#cal t&oug&tE and

scien>c met&odolog#. LeQ :rain dominance results in rigid ske'cismE sciensmE racismE s'eciesismE

soli'sismE e=treme egosmE moral rela%ismE social darwinismE eugenicsE and aut&oritarianism. W&en

t&ere is a leQ2:rain im:alanceE t&e lim:ic or emoonal 'art of t&e :rain will s&ut down and t&e sur%i%al

as'ect re'lian :rain will rule o%er. &e mentalit# summoned :# t&is im:alance leads one to :ecome a

controller and t&ink t&e# are t&e masters of ot&er indi%iduals.

&e nature of rig&t2:rain is intui%e and is res'onsi:le for crea%it#E )w*&olisc t&oug&t and com'assion.Big&t :rain dominance results in nai%et\E :lind :eliefE religious e=tremismE soli'sismE unwort&inessE self2

loat&ingE order followingE and a willing sla%e. W&en t&ere is a rig&t2:rain im:alance t&e B2com'le=E or

sur%i%al 'art of t&e :rainE :ecomes s&ut down and lim:ic :rainE or emoonsE dominate. &e nega%e

manifestaon of a rig&t2:rain summons t&e mentalit# of a sla%e and constantl# tells one not to stand u'

for t&emsel%es. Peo'le wit& t&is im:alance are ruled :# t&eir emoon.

&e mental sc&ism and im:alance t&at results :etween t&ese leQ and rig&t :rain im:alances is w&at

leads to destrucon in our li%es and t&e li%es of ot&ers. Wit& a leQ2:rain im:alanceE t&e indi%idual

declares t&at s$&e is god and &as t&e rig&t to control e%er#t&ing$e%er#oneE :ecoming a self2asserted

sla%e master. &e indi%idual wit& a rig&t2:rain im:alance declares t&at s$&e is 'owerless to c&angean#t&ing and self2im'oses 'ersonal sla%er#. 4ot& im:alances creates a 'at& of destrucon for eit&er

t&emsel%es or ot&er indi%iduals.

A furt&er e='lanaon and :#'roduct of t&is leQ2:rain %ersus rig&t2:rain dic&otom# is a world%iew

sc&ism. &e indi%idual :elie%es w&oll# in eit&er randomness or determinism. &e world %iew of

GBandomness 'ro'oses t&at t&e uni%erse is a grand cosmic accident wit& nature :eing dead. &ere is no

creator in t&is world%iewE w&ic& means t&at t&ere is no underl#ing intelligence in nature. &ere is no

~ 16 ~



suc& t&ing as s'iritual$moral$natural law. "=istence &as no 'ur'ose ot&er t&an to connue e=isng. All of

t&ese are t&e &allmarks of non2:elief in a creatorE totalitarianismE and dark occulsm.

!eterminism is a '&iloso'&ical ideolog# t&at 'ro'oses somet&ing controls e%er# e%ent in creaonE

generall# godE wit& all occurrences :eing 'reordained. 9ree will is an illusionE and t&erefore does not

e=istE so acon is wit&out reason and ulmatel# meaningless. !eterminism means alread# setE and t&at

e%er#t&ing is 'redicated u'on or fated. &is rig&t :rain im:alance causes one to :elie%e &umans are

'owerless to create c&ange. &ese modes of t&oug&t are &allmarks of sla%e t&ink and religiouse=tremism.

Accuratel# 'ercei%ing and understanding realit# is accuratel# 'ercei%ing and understanding t&e trut&.

Bealit# is com'osed of :ot& a determinisc and a random com'onent. &e !etermined com'onent is

natural law or cause and eCectE ot&erwise known as uni%ersal lawE moral lawE karmaE etcetera. Natural

law &as :eenE isE and will :e in eCect as long as t&e uni%erse is in e=istence. W&et&er one :elie%es in

karma or notE most do understand w&at it means and t&at e%er# acon #ields a reacon. &is law

'ro%ides us wit& t&e determinisc 'oron of our realit#E :ecause one cannot esca'e t&e real lawE

nature;s law.

(rigins of the *niverse

o full# understand t&e laws of natureE we must ask t&e Rueson of &ow t&e uni%erse came to :e(

&is :ook doesn;t claim to &a%e Gall t&e grand answers a:out t&e uni%erse and life. &e Rueson of god

&as :een one of t&e greatest Ruesons and one of t&e most de:ated to'ics since anRuit#. &e literal

meaning of t&e word Ggod is- rulerE su'erior aut&orit#E and 3u'reme 4eing. <odE as descri:ed :#

monot&eisc religionsE resem:les a dictator. Howe%erE :ased on t&e e%idenceE no suc& ent# e=ists. Itcan;t :e ruled out :ecause it can;t :e dis'ro%en #etE :ut t&e e%idence for a uni%ersal ruler e=isng isn;t

well su''orted enoug& to &a%e good reason to :elie%e t&e uni%erse is ruled :# a :eing wit& an iron >st.

0ne t&ing t&at t&e e%idence does su''ort is a creator of t&e uni%erse. &ere are two models for t&e

uni%erse;s e=istenceE and t&e >rst is t&e Gstead#2state model. &is model 'ostulates t&at t&e uni%erse

&as alwa#s :een in e=istence. Howe%erE t&is model is a maOor assum'on :ased u'on 'rimi%e science.

NowE modern science &as s&ot down and :lown t&e stead# state model awa#. 0%erw&elming and almost

indis'uta:le e%idence su''orts t&e t&eor# t&at t&e uni%erse &ad a :eginning. "%idence for t&is can :e

found in t&e e='ansion of t&e uni%erse. Besearc&ers wanted to :elie%e t&at t&e uni%erse alwa#s was and

alwa#s will :eE &owe%erE o:ser%aons o%er t&e last &undred #ears &a%e descri:ed gala=ies #ing awa#from eac& ot&er. "%idence suggests t&at if gala=ies are furt&er :ranc&ing out from eac& ot&er t&enE long

agoE t&e# were once clum'ed toget&er. &is means t&at somet&ing started t&eir mo%ementE w&ic& is

w&# we &a%e t&e :ig :ang t&eor#. &e second e%idence for t&e :ig :ang t&eor# is t&e cosmic :ackground

radiaon 'roduced as remnants of t&e :ig :ang. &is e%idence 'ro%ed to :e a fatal :low from t&e old

outdated %iew of t&e stead#2state model. &e t&ird e%idence for t&e :ig :ang t&eor# is t&e rela%e

a:undance of lig&t elements suc& as &#drogen and &elium. Now a fourt& 'iece of e%idence &as :een

recentl# disco%eredE w&ic& is gra%itaon ri''les or wa%esE resulng from t&e :ig :ang.

~ 17 ~



W&en "instein de%elo'ed &is eRuaons for t&e t&eor# of general rela%it#E it s&owed t&at t&ere was an

origin of t&e uni%erse. Howe%erE "instein didn;t want to acce't t&is so &e added somet&ing called a

Gcosmological constantE w&ic& was taken :ack out :# "instein &imself w&en &e later realied it was

incorrect. He realied t&is w&en more e%idence su''orted t&e :ig :ang t&eor# and t&at t&e uni%erse was

e='anding. He stated t&at introducing t&e cosmological constant was t&e :iggest mistake of &is scien>c

career. 3ke'cs and materialists didn;t want to acce't t&e :ig :ang t&eor# :ecause t&e# knew it

su''orted t&e 'ossi:ilit# t&at somet&ing :egan t&e uni%erse and t&at t&ere is a creator.

W&at is of utmost im'ortance is all t&at was created in t&is e%ent called t&e :ig :ang. All maer and

energ#E as well as me and s'ace were :roug&t into e=istence. &e :ig :ang t&eor# reRuires a creator

:ecause somet&ing cannot come from not&ing. 3ke'cs t&at don;t :elie%e in a creator of t&e uni%erse

must &a%e an alterna%e e='lanaon for &ow t&e :ig :ag came a:outE :ut t&e# lack logic and 'ro:a:ilit#.

&ere needs to :e a cause.

Man# ske'cs will oQen askE Gw&at caused t&e ;causeE; or t&e creator( WellE t&ere surel# is an a:surdit#

in 'ro%ing in>nite regressi%e e%ents. If t&ere is a cause for t&e creator t&en w&at caused t&at cause( And

w&at caused t&e cause t&at caused t&at cause( In realit#E t&e cause is one- t&e original cause. &ecreator is un2caused. Kust like t&e domino eCectE t&ere is one cause to iniate t&e seRuence of falling

dominoes. &e most logical 'ro:lem2sol%ing tec&niRue to ulie &ere would :e G0ccam;s raor. &is

'rinci'le states t&atE among com'eng &#'ot&esesE t&e one wit& t&e fewest assum'ons s&ould :e

selected. More com'le= soluons ma# 'ro%e correctE :ut it is :eer to make fewer assum'ons in t&e

a:sence of certaint#- t&e sim'lest answer is usuall# correct. &e cosmological argument states-

Premise ,- W&ate%er :egins to e=ist &as a cause

Premise - &e uni%erse :egan to e=ist

Premise - &erefore t&e uni%erse &as a cause

&is argument &as :een &ea%il# de:ated for some meE :ut it is t&e most logical and :est e='lanaon for

e='laining e=istence. We must understand t&at t&e cause for t&e uni%erse must :e immaterial since all

maer was created aQer its creaon. AlsoE t&e >rst law of t&ermod#namics does not a''l# :efore t&e

uni%erse;s creaon. &is law states t&at energ# cannot :e created nor destro#ed. Howe%erE t&is is a

uni%ersal '&#sical law and t&erefore does not a''l# to an e=istence :efore t&e uni%erseJs ince'on. &e

two immaterial t&ings t&at e=ist are mind and a:stract o:Oects. &e 'ro:lem wit& a:stract o:Oects are

t&at t&e# cannot cause an#t&ing. 9or e=am'le- num:ers are a:stract o:Oects. &e laws of arit&mec

cannot create or generate an#t&ing. &e eRuaon ) V ] 1* did not create an#t&ing material. If no

mone# in :eing de'osited into t&e :ank and one e='ects interest to :e accrued :# t&e laws of arit&mec

aloneE s$&e will :e fore%er :ankru't. &e mat&emacal laws of t&e interest eRuaon cannot createmone# wit&out a 'ersonal agent >rst acRuiring it and distri:ung some into a :ank.

&e Laws of Nature 'roduce no e%entsE t&e# onl# e='lain t&e 'aern :# w&ic& e%er# e%ent t&at can

&a''en must conformE Oust as t&e rules of arit&mec state t&e 'aern to w&ic& all monetar#

transacons must conform. In one senseE t&e laws of nature co%er t&e w&ole >eld of s'ace and me. In

anot&erE t&e# lea%e out t&e w&ole real uni%erse. &e incessant torrent of actual e%ents w&ic& make u'

true &istor# must come from somew&ere else to t&ink natural laws can 'roduce t&em is like t&inking

~ 18 ~



#ou can create real mone# :# sim'l# doing sums. 9or e%er# law sa#s in t&e last resort- GIf #ou &a%e AE

t&en #ou will get 4E :ut >rst catc& #our A. &e Laws will not do it for #ou. 2 +.3. Lewis

&e laws of '&#sics could not create t&e uni%erseE :ecause it is not an agent t&at can generate an# kind

of eCect. Newton;s laws of moon did not create a soccer :all to roll across t&e ground. &at could onl#

:e done :# t&e agenc# of an indi%idualE wit& intenonE using t&eir legs and energ# in t&eir muscles to

kick t&e :all.

&e 'rimordial >re:all t&at e=isted :efore "art& refers to t&e 'rimi%e uni%erseE so it could not :e t&e

cause. &e cause must &a%e :een immaterial and not e=isng wit&in t&e :ounds of me and s'aceE if all

maerE meE and s'ace were created aQer t&e creaon of t&e uni%erse. It can :e e=tremel# diXcult to

imagine a realit# wit&out maerE meE or s'aceE and t&at is 'recisel# w&# man# classif# t&is cause as

unknowa:le and also t&e creator. Howe%erE t&e creator of t&e uni%erse could not &a%e :een an a:stract

o:OectE :ut it must &a%e :een a form of intelligence.

&e :est e='lanaon for e=istence is a creator. &ere need not :e an e='lanaon for t&e :est

e='lanaon. Ma#:e no one knows &ow t&e creator is t&e original cause or t&e e=act 'ro'eres of t&e

creatorE :ut it is most sensi:le to acknowledge a creator is t&e :est e='lanaon for t&e e=istence of our

uni%erse and all life. If t&ere was no cause t&en our e=istence would :e t&e result of randomness or

some grand cosmic accident. It is nai%e to :elie%e suc& a t&ingE as will :e detailed ne=t t&roug& 'roof of

intelligent design.

Intelligent Design

Intelligent design states t&at it takes a source of intelligence for somet&ing to come into :eingE meaning

a creaon reRuired 'ure intenon and will to :e created. We can noce t&is w&en we look at almost an#

structure or mac&iner#E es'eciall# com'le= onesE w&et&er it :e a &ouseE carE or Oet engine. We know

t&ese structures and mac&ines were not t&e result of random occurrences. Natural forces suc& as wind

and tem'erature could not &a%e created t&em. A 'ersonal agent needs to :e introduced wit& will and

intenon to create t&ese t&ings. An intelligence is needed to 'roduce suc& a com'le= work. 3omeone

from t&e ,?t& centur#E w&om &as ne%er seen a Oet engineE would not t&ink it was a 'art of natureJs

construcon. 3$&e would fairl# and logicall# come to t&e conclusion t&at t&is com'le= mac&ine were t&e

creaon of a designer. He ma# not know w&om created it or :e a:le to e='lain &ow it was createdE :ut

it;s onl# raonal to see t&at it is t&e result of intelligent intenonal designE and not random occurrences.

3eeing a :eauful landsca'e 'ainng and assuming t&at it was not t&e work of t&e 'ainterE :ut of

random occurrenceE would :e undermining t&e 'ainter.

&e eart&E t&e sk# and t&e cosmos are all 'art of a :eauful and e=traordinar# 'ainng. It was not t&e

result of a grand cosmic accidentE :ut was t&e intenonal creaon of a magni>cent intelligence. &e

o''osion to intelligent design is t&at t&e uni%erse e=ists :ecause of a grand cosmic accident and all

t&ings and s#stems are t&e result of randomness. Howe%erE it is found t&at t&e laws of '&#sics and t&e

masses of t&e %er# 'arcles t&e make u' t&e uni%erse &a%e to :e %er# >nel# tuned or e%er#t&ing would

fall a'art.

~ 19 ~



0ne of t&e most undenia:le 'roofs for intelligent design is in t&e mat&emacs of t&e 9i:onacci

seRuence. &is eRuaon is found t&roug&out all t&ings in natureE inanimate o:Oects and li%ing :eings

alike. You can see suc& 'aerns in a seas&ellE a owerE and a snowake. &e one w&om disco%ered t&is

mat&emacal seRuence is an Italian mat&emacian named Leonardo 9i:onacci. He generated a list of

num:ers :# adding t&e two 're%ious num:ers. 9or e=am'le- )8 V , ] ,* ), V , ] * ), V ] * ) V ] D* )

V D ] * )D V ] ,*.

It kee's on going like t&is in>nitel#. 9i:onacci came to t&e realiaon t&at t&is seRuence of num:ers

came to descri:e man# items found in nature. &e num:er of dais# 'etals is ruled :# t&e mat&emacal

laws of t&e 9i:onacci seRuence and t&e s'irals of t&ese sunower orets &armonie wit& t&e 9i:onacci

seRuence. &e dis'la# of t&e orets on a sunower are in 'erfect dis'la# of DDE 1E and ,. Kust to list a

few ot&ers- t&e s'iral in a 'ine coneE a 'inea''leE gala=iesE and an ocean wa%e. &is mat&emacal

seRuence a''ears to :e t&e trademark of an intelligent designer or arc&itect.

&e mat&emacal formulaonE called t&e golden rao or golden mean ),.6,8?7*E 'ro%ides furt&er

e%idence for a designer. &is rao e=&i:its itself in t&e dou:le &eli= of !NA :etween t&e &eli=es widt&

and c#cle lengt& )1 angstroms long $ , angstroms wide ] ,.6,...*. &is rao also e=&i:its itself in t&estructure of a well2'ro'oroned )wo*man- it would :e t&e measurement from t&e foot to t&e na%el

di%ided :# t&e measurement from t&e na%el to t&e to' of t&e &ead eRualing out to ,.6,.

Argua:l# t&e most com'elling e%idence for intelligent design came out of two arcles in &ig&l#

'resgious scien>c Oournals. In Kanuar# 8,8 G3cience !ail# stated t&at t&e golden rao was o:ser%ed

for t&e >rst me in t&e Ruantum world of solid state maer. An arcle in GNature in Marc& 8,8

e='lained t&at t&e golden rao &as now :een o:ser%ed in a magnec com'ound. 9or t&e >rst me a

nano2scale s#mmetr# &as :een o:ser%ed in solid state maer. Fuantum '&#sics is t&e stud# of t&e :ase

le%el 'arcles t&at make u' nature. In ot&er wordsE t&e smallest o:ser%a:le :uilding :locks of energies

or 'arcles t&at make u' e%er#t&ing.

G4# tuning t&e s#stem and ar>ciall# introducing more Ruantum uncertaint# t&e researc&ers o:ser%ed

t&at t&e c&ain of atoms acts like a nano2scale guitar string. !r. Badu +oldea from 0=ford 5ni%ersit#E w&o

is t&e 'rinci'al aut&or of t&e 'a'er and dro%e t&e internaonal 'roOect from its ince'on a decade ago

unl t&e 'resentE e='lains- [Here t&e tension comes from t&e interacon :etween s'ins causing t&em to

magnecall# resonate. 9or t&ese interacons we found a series )scale* of resonant notes- &e >rst two

notes s&ow a 'erfect relaons&i' wit& eac& ot&er. &eir freRuencies )'itc&* are in t&e rao of ,.6,^ 2

3cience !ail#

GMat&emacs is t&e language wit& w&ic& god &as wrien t&e uni%erse. 2 <alileo

&e reason t&e golden rao and t&e 9i:onacci seRuence gi%e e%idence for intelligent design is :ecause of

t&eir tec&nicalit# and 'recision. Wit&out intelligent designE t&e uni%erse was :irt&ed out of randomness.

+an randomness create com'le= s#stems or &a%e 'recision( Bandomness is c&aos. Will and intenon are

necessar# to &a%e 'recision. &e golden rao and 9i:onacci seRuence found in nature 'ro%ides us wit&

e%idence of an arc&itect and t&e mat&emacal language wit& w&ic& nature was wrien.

~ 20 ~



&e science of intelligent design a:solutel# :lows an# ot&er t&eor# out of t&e water w&en it comes to

descri:ing t&e uni%erse t&at we li%e in. 0ne would :e deluding t&emsel%es if t&e# t&oug&t t&e uni%erse

was created :# random occurrences and not :# t&e intent of an arc&itect$designer$creator. If one t&inks

t&isE it is surel# t&e result of not knowing t&e em'irical data w&ic& &a%e :een 'resented me and me

again. If t&is is not t&e caseE ma#:e one 'refers t&e idea of a creator2less uni%erse.

A uni%erse wit&out a creator :rings u' t&e necessar# Rueson of &ow life came to :e. We now know t&att&e uni%erse &ad to :e %er# >nel# tuned for life to e%ol%e. 9or t&ere to :e lifeE t&e room for error is

e=tremel# minuscule. &e cosmological constant is tuned to ,8 to t&e ,8 t&at;s ,8 decimal 'laces. No

one t&inks t&at is accidental. It would :e unreasona:le. If t&e condions in t&e uni%erse were oC from

t&e cosmological constantE Oust slig&tl#E e%en oC o%er ,8 to t&e , trilliont& decimal 'lacesE t&en we

wouldn;t :e &ere :ecause t&e uni%erse would :e drascall# diCerent making it im'ossi:le for us and all

ot&er life to e=ist. 3uc& 'recision and >ne tuning gi%es e%idence :e#ond a reasona:le dou:t for a Gtuner.

It is out of t&e Rueson t&at t&is unfat&oma:l# 'recise num:erE t&e cosmological constantE arose :#

c&ance.

3ome sciensts &a%e come u' wit& a mul2%erse t&eor# w&ic& states t&at an e=traordinaril# &ig& num:erof uni%erses e=istE and luck# for usE ours was t&e one t&at is a:le to su''ort life. &is t&eor# is necessar#

to &el' e='lain t&e e=tremel# im'ro:a:le situaon of our uni%erse su''orng life. &ere would &a%e to

:e a mul2%erse to get t&e 'ro:a:ilit# for Grandomness to :e a reasona:le e='lanaon. Howe%erE t&is

t&eor# is not tec&nicall# scien>cE :ecause a mul2%erse cannot :e o:ser%ed. A mul2%erse would :e

uno:ser%a:le in 'rinci'leE and t&e onl# one we can o:ser%e is t&is one. &ere;s no e%idence to :elie%e

t&at we e=ist in a mul2%erse and t&erefore it is not raonal to consider. It;s a common fallac# w&en one

creates t&eories to su''ort a conce't t&e# alread# :elie%e. &e onl# reason for t&is mul2%erse t&eor#

would :e to derail t&e >ne tuning 'osion. &is t&eor# does indeed inate 'ro:a:ilisc resources :#

'ostulang countless uni%erses and re'resents t&e 'eak of man;s irraonalit#. AndE e%en if t&ere is a

mul2%erseE w&o;s to sa# a creator didn;t fas&ion t&e mul2%erse(

If #ou get enoug& :a:oons t#'ing on ke#:oards in &o'es of 'roducing one of 3&akes'eareJs worksE it

ma# e%entuall# come to :e. Yet no one looks at 3&akes'eareJs workE in t&e a:sence of inde'endent

e%idenceE and t&inks a countless num:er of :a:oons were t#'ing and created it at random. &e :eaut#E

eleganceE and com'le=it# of 3&akes'eareJs work o:%iousl# came a:out from a single aut&or or designer

it is t&e most raonal e='lanaon.

Howe%erE if intelligent design sll isn;t con%incingE t&e maOor aws in t&e t&eor# of !arwinian e%oluon

needs to :e discussed. +&arles !arwin was aware t&at &e could 'roduce no %ia:le e%idence t&at all life

came from a common ancestor one of t&e man# facts t&at in%alidated &is t&eor#. He admied to &is lack

of e%idence in a c&a'ter of &is :ook called G!iXcules of t&e &eor#. !arwin;s &o'e was t&at t&ese

diXcules would :e sur'assed :# new modern scien>c ad%ances. Howe%erE Ruite t&e o''osite &as

&a''enedE and ad%ances in science refute !arwin;s t&eor# :it :# :it.

!arwin ne%er addressed t&e Rueson of &ow t&e >rst li%ing organism came into :eingE :ecause &e

wasn;t aware t&at t&is lack of informaon mig&t in%alidate &is t&eor#. &e 'rimi%e science of !arwin;s

~ 21 ~



da# :elie%ed t&at life &ad a %er# sim'le structure. !uring t&is me 'eriodE s'ontaneous generaonE

w&ere:# li%ing t&ings could arise from non2li%ing t&ingsE was commonl# acce'ted as fact. +onsider

maggots in meat- it was t&oug&t t&at slaug&tered es& 'roduced maggotsE unl a scien>c e='eriment

was 'roduced to descri:e t&at it was onl# an illusion. A 'iece of animal es& was 'ut into glass Oar and

seemingl# 'roduced maggotsE :ut w&en t&e glass Oar was co%ered from t&e start no maggots came to :e.

3ciensts t&en :egan to realie t&at ies were de'osing microsco'ic lar%ae on t&e meat aQer t&e# saw

ies tr#ing to get inside t&e co%ered Oar. It was also t&oug&t t&at frogs s'ontaneousl# arose from mudE

mice from w&eatE and :acteria from inanimate maer.

3oon aQer !arwin;s 'u:licaon of G&e 0rigin of 3'eciesE t&e famous 9renc& :iologistE Luis PasteurE

refuted t&e m#t&s of s'ontaneous generaon t&at la# ground for e%oluon aQer man# studies and

e='eriments.

Pasteur said- G+an maer organie itself( No oda# t&ere is no circumstance know under w&ic& one

could aXrm t&at microsco'ic :eings &a%e come into t&e world wit&out 'arents resem:ling t&emsel%es.

0ne of t&e >rst e%oluonists to take on t&e issue of t&e origin of life was t&e :iologistE Ale=ander 0'arin.

His &o'e was to descri:e &ow t&e >rst li%ing cellE t&at was t&e common ancestor to all li%ing :eingsEcould emerge. Ne%ert&eless &is eCorts resulted in failure.

0'arin stated- G5nfortunatel#E t&e origin of t&e cell remains a Rueson t&at is actuall# t&e murkiest

as'ect of t&e w&ole t&eor# of e%oluon.

&ere were man# more e='eriments t&at aem'ted to 'ro%e t&e t&eor# of e%oluon in t&e 8t& centur#.

0ne of t&e most well2known e='eriments was conducted :# t&e American c&emistsE 3tanle# MillerE in

,?D. He gat&ered a few sim'le organic molecules :# triggering a reacon among certain gases &e

claimed would &a%e :een around during t&e 'rimordial "art&;s atmos'&ere. &e e='eriment was

considered to :e scien>c 'roof for t&e t&eor# of e%oluonE :ut turned out to :e not&ing of t&e sort.&e in%alidit# of t&e e='eriment was e%entuall# admied :# Miller &imself. o t&is %er# da#E e%er#

aem't to account for t&e origin of life :# e%oluonists &as ended in e'ic failure.

oda# we understand t&at li%ing cells are e=tremel# com'le= in com'osion and funcon. &ese

com'le=ies could not &a%e :een realied in !arwin;s me :ecause of t&e 'rimi%e microsco'e

tec&nolog#. &ese microsco'es could onl# detail a cell enoug& t&at it a''eared like a featureless :lo:. It

was not unl t&e in%enon of t&e 'owerful electron microsco'es in t&e middle of t&e 8t& centur# t&at

it was realied &ow organied and com'le= cells wereE w&ic& could not :e a 'roduct of c&ance.

&ousands of microsco'ic 'arts work in &armon# and unison for t&e cell to funcon and sta# ali%e.

Wit&out all t&e organelles e=isng at once toget&erE t&e cell could not funcon. &e organelles act as

data:anksE factories and re>neriesE 'ower s#stemsE storage s#stemsE and trans'ortaon s#stems. &ese

could not :e a result of 'ure coincidence. A li%ing cell works wit& a com'lete and undenia:le intricac#. If

!arwin &ad t&e tec&nolog# of toda#E &e would ne%er &a%e ne%er 'ro'osed &is 'ast t&eor#.

~ 22 ~



Proteins

9or life to originateE 'roteins must :e constructed. Proteins are t&e :uilding :locks of life and t&e

c&ances of a 'rotein arising out of a 'rimordial sou' of amino acids is astronomicall# low.

&e odds of geZng amino acids seRuenced 'ro'erl# are ,8 to t&e 71t& 'ower. 0t&er 'ro:a:ilisc

&urdles must :e o%ercome too. Amino acids must :e aac&ed to eac& ot&er using a 'e'de :ond. &e

odds of t&is is ,8 to t&e 1Dt& 'ower. Now t&e correct o'cal isomer to :uild t&e 'rotein must :eo:tained. Amino acids come in two diCerent t#'es of o'cal isomers. &is raises t&e odd to anot&er ,8

to t&e 1Dt& 'ower. All t&e odds added toget&er sum u' to :e ,8 to t&e ,61t& 'owerE or ,61 eros. &ese

are t&e c&ances of >nding a funconal 'rotein in t&is uni%erse :# c&ance. 9or com'arisonE t&ere;s ,8 to

t&e 8t& elementar# 'arcles in t&e uni%erseE ,8 to t&e ,6t& seconds since t&e :ig :angE and ,8 to t&e

,?t& e%ents since t&e :eginning of t&e uni%erse. W&ere is t&e logic and reason in t&is e='lanaon(

Wit&out e%idenceE t&is &#'ot&esis is one of im'ro:a:le c&ance. It doesn;t get t&e Oo: done and it;s not

considered a %alid e='lanaon for t&e origins of life or t&e uni%erse :# an# serious scienst.

&e com'le= structure of !NA also 'resents e%idence for an intelligent designer. Humans &a%e o%er

:illion leers of !NA informaon in eac& cell. 3ome e%oluonists sa# t&at we are ?_ or ?D_ similar to

an a'e in !NA structureE :ut e%en a _ diCerence results in ,6 million s'elling errors. Howe%erE t&is is

not errorE :ut diCerent and new informaon. &e e%idence doesn;t su''ort a common ancestorE :ut a

common designer. W&en we see similar :uildingsE it is oQen :ecause t&e# are all works of t&e same

arc&itect. We s&are D8_ of our !NA wit& a :ananaE :ut t&at doesn;t mean we are &alf :anana. A

common designer is a muc& :eer e='lanaon for t&e similaries in our !NA to t&at of a'es.

!eo=#ri:onucleic acid )!NA* is informaon similar to a coded message. It resem:les a language

com'rised of t&e four diCerent :ases )<A+*E and t&e e%idence su''orts t&is. All informaon for a li%ing

organism is stored in t&is data :ank. 1 nucleodes com:ine to 'roduce 8 amino acidsE w&ic& t&en

com:ine to 'roduce ,88E888 'roteins. "%er# cell in t&e &uman :od# is 'acked wit& feet of !NAE and

t&e codes t&at com'rise of it &a%e all t&e &allmarks of a language w&ic& :iologists are onl# :eginning to

crack. "%en if we can;t read a languageE it is sll recognia:le as a languageE and eac& language must

&a%e an aut&or.

G"%oluon is dead. It oCers a 'aral e='lanaon for &ow a s'ecies can e%ol%e wit&in itselfE :ut it cannot

e='lain &ow new Gkinds of animals are 'roduced. !arwinian e%oluonists couldn;t &el' :ut see t&e aw

in natural seleconE so t&e# added a new mec&anism called Gmutaon to e='ound u'on t&eir t&eor#.

Howe%erE mutaons usuall# result from distorons in or damages to t&e !NA of li%ing :eings and

generall# cause &arm. Mutaons &a%e ne%er :een o:ser%ed to add com'letel# new genec informaon

and it seems im'ossi:le for mutaon to allow life to acRuire new organs.

!NA is most de>nitel# a codeE and a code s#stem is t&e result of a mental 'rocess. &e reRuirements for

a codeE t&enE is an intelligent source or in%entor. In factE maer cannot generate an# codeE Oust as t&e

'&#sical laws cannot generate an# mone# in t&e :ank. Mone# needs to :e organied into t&e :ankE Oust

as t&e code needs to :e organied into :eing. &is reRuires t&at a t&inking :eing %oluntaril# e=ercises

cognionE crea%it#E and free will. &ere is no law of nature t&at gi%es e%idence to :elie%e informaon

~ 23 ~



and languages can originate :# t&emsel%es in maer.

!arwinian e%oluonists ignore a %er# im'ortant e%ent in t&e origin of life known as t&e G+am:rian

e='losion. Man# s'ecies a''ear Ruite a:ru'tl# according to t&e fossil record of t&e +am:rian 'eriod.

Howe%erE t&is contradicts !arwin;s t&eor# of one common ancestorE :ecause according to t&e e%oluon

t&eor#E life graduall# e%ol%ed and di%erged. In t&e +am:rian 'eriodE t&e di%ergences in life occurred at

onceE no graduall#E as 'ro%ed in t&e fossil record. &is com'letel# decimates !arwin;s tree of life t&eor#.

In factE !arwinJs own words refute &is t&eor# of Ge%oluon.

GIf numerous s'eciesE :elonging to t&e same genera of familiesE &a%e reall# started into life all at onceE

t&e fact would :e fatal to t&e t&eor# of descent wit& slow modi>caon t&roug& natural selecon. 2

+&arles !arwin

GYou ma# :e sur'rised to know t&at t&e fundamental assum'ons u'on w&ic& e%oluonar# t&inking is

:ased are not at all con>rmed :# 'aleontolog#. 2 Professor Bo:erto 9undi

All organisms S :acteriaE algaeE and &umans alike S a''ear a:ru'tl# in t&e fossil recordE wit&out an#

known links connecng t&ese grou's to eac& ot&er. If e%oluon was correctE t&en museums would :eo%erowing wit& t&e transions of GkindsE suc& as a re'le2:irdE walking sea creaturesE and a'e2man. In

realit#E t&ese are m#t&ological creatures. Modern science claims !arwinian e%oluon can turn

am'&i:ious mammals into w&alesE dinosaurs into :irdsE and a'es into &umans. &ere would &a%e to :e

o:ser%a:le e%idence in w&at !arwin refers to as Gc&anges in kinds. A Gkind refers to a su:OectE suc& as

an animalE t&at e='resses t&e same nature or c&aracter. G"%oluon can &a''en in regards to ada'taon

wit&in a s'ecies or GkindE w&ic& can :e referred to as s'eciaon. &is is a t#'e of micro2e%oluonE suc&

as a wolf :ecoming a dog t&roug& domescaonE creang new s'ecies. A cou'le e=am'les of s'eciaon

or ada'taon are- t&ree2s'ined sckle:acksE >nc&esE and t&e Ge%oluon of :acteria and %iruses.

Howe%erE t&e Ge%oluon t&at occurs &ere aren;t c&anges in kinds. &e sckle:acks sll remain >s&E t&e

>nc&es sll remain :irdsE and t&e :acteria and %iruses sll remain :acteria and %iruses. &ere are noc&anges in kinds as !arwin 'ro'osed.

If somet&ing is !arwinian e%oluonE t&en #ou s&ould :e a:le to answer t&e RuesonE Gw&at did it

:ecome( If t&e su:Oect is sll t&e same kind of animalE suc& as a :ird remaining a :irdE t&en no

!arwinian e%oluon &as occurred. &ese c&anges in Gkinds are also referred to as macro2e%oluon. &is

form of e%oluonE w&ere:# one famil# of animal can e%ol%e into a diCerent famil# of animalsE is said to

reRuire millions to :illions of #ears. W&at se'arates dogs from cats for e=am'le is t&eir famil#

classi>caon. !ogs are in t&e famil# GcanidaeE w&ile cats are in t&e famil# Gfelidae. !arwinian e%oluon

'ro'oses it;s 'ossi:le for an e%oluon across families to occur. Howe%erE t&is is not o:ser%a:le and

t&erefore incom'a:le wit& t&e scien>c met&od. &e scien>c met&od is de'endent u'on o:ser%a:le

and re'eata:le e='eriments. Ironicall#E w&at is uno:ser%a:le can;t :e re'eata:le. 3ome ma# askE G&ow

can t&e :ig2:ang t&eor# :e scien>c t&en( WellE one answer would :e t&at we can sll o:ser%e t&e

uni%erse e='anding. Howe%erE we cannot o:ser%e a re'le turning into a :irdE unless we were to :e

immortal in our current :odies we sim'l# do not &a%e t&e millions or :illions of #ears to scien>call#

o:ser%e t&is 'rocess &a''ening. !arwinian e%oluon is 'seudoscience and is erroneousl# 'edaled :# t&e

scien>c communit# as real. o :elie%e in !arwinian e%oluon reRuires massi%e amounts of :lind fait&.

~ 24 ~



&is is ironicE :ecause most sciensts look down on fait&. Here;s w&at a follower of sciensm &as to sa#

a:out fait&-

[9ait& is t&e great co'2outE t&e great e=cuse to e%ade t&e need to t&ink and e%aluate e%idence[ 2 Bic&ard

!awkins

3ince t&ere is no trul# o:ser%a:le e%idence of !arwinian e%oluonE a cou'le of fossils were oCered as so2

called G'roof t&at transional s'ecies once roamed t&e "art&. 3adl#E t&e science and e%idence doesn;tsu''ort t&is as fact. Yet museums dress u' stuCed dummies and get make2u' arsts to [reconstruct[

t&ese m#t&ological creatures. !arwinian e%oluonists sim'l# in%ent %er# diCerent faces for t&e same

skull using t&eir imaginaon. &e# 'ut &alf2man$&alf2a'e creatures in front of a >re and la:el it an

e=&i:it of w&at actuall# &a''ened in G&istor#. Well ma#:e it did &a''en in G&is stor#E :ut it;s onl# a tale

of >con. &ese &alf2man$&alf2a'e creatures are also in sc&ool te=t:ooksE e%en com'uter generated for

t&e G&istorical and scien>c documentaries$learning 'rogramsE and entertainment. Most of usE

es'eciall# t&e new generaonE &a%e :een 'rogrammed since sc&ooling to consider Ruesoning

Ge%oluon ridiculous.

It was found t&at fossils included :# !arwinian e%oluonists under classi>caons suc& as Homo erectusEHomo sa'ien arc&aicE or Homo egaster actuall# :elong to diCerent &uman classi>ed races li%ing on "art&

toda#. Peo'le located on diCerent connents do e=&i:it structural diCerences in skull t#'e. Howe%erE

w&en t&e w&ole skeleton is com'ared to t&ese so2called &alf2man &alf2a'e s'eciesE t&e# were %irtuall#

idencal. &e skulls of some of t&e modeled &alf2man$&alf2a'e creatures were actuall# reconstructed

using a &uman skull wit& a 'rimate Oaw :one. In ot&er wordsE !arwinian e%oluon &as :een one of t&e

:iggest &oa=es 'eddled t&roug&out t&e Gscien>c communit#. 3ome force of control must not want us

to realie w&ere we came from as a s'ecies.

(rigins

We cannot understand an#t&ing 'ro>cientl# wit&out understanding its origins. 9or e=am'le-

understanding t&e meanings of a word to t&e :est of our a:ilit# is most 'ossi:le t&roug& stud#ing its

origin or et#molog#. &ink of t&e tele'&one or +&inese w&is'ers game w&ere 'eo'le in a line 'ass a

message t&roug& word of mout&. An indi%idual at one end of t&e line decides on a '&rase and w&is'ers

it to t&e )wo*man on t&e rig&t. &e message ows seRuenall# t&roug& t&e line of 'eo'le unl it reac&es

t&e endE and t&e last 'erson s'eaks t&e '&rase loudl#. Man# know t&is game and remem:er t&at t&e

message c&anges drascall# and %irtuall# e%er# me. 3omemes t&e wording itself doesn;t c&ange

drascall#E :ut t&e meaning of t&e message does. @nowing t&e origin of somet&ing is of utmost

im'ortance for understanding somet&ing to t&e :est of our a:ilit#.

&e 'ro:lem is t&at muc& of &uman &istor# &as :een tam'ered wit& or c&anged drascall# t&roug&out

t&e ages. If we wis& to understand &ow t&e uni%erse worksE &uman natureE and our 'otenal desnies

t&en we need to :eer understand our origins in a )w*&olisc sense. Beduconist science claims t&at our

origins are t&e result of a random e='losion called t&e G:ig :angE :ut fails to e='lain w&at caused it and

~ 25 ~



t&e 'erfect condions for life came a:out. Beligion 'uts fort& t&at e%er#t&ing in creaon was t&e result

of a se'arate or e=ternal >gure called GgodE :ut fails to e='lain muc& else. &e di%ine source t&at is

referred to as god didE in factE create t&e uni%erse and w&at is known as t&e G:ig :ang. Howe%erE realit#

is not totall# determinisc :# t&is source. 9ree2will is called free2will for a reason. It :rings t&e random

com'onent to realit# in t&e form of c&oice. &e source controls e%er#t&ing u' to t&e 'oint of t&e

e%oluon of a :eings; free will. W&en t&e term e%oluon is used wit&out RuotesE I refer onl# to t&e

e%oluon of consciousnessE not !arwinian Ge%oluon.

Human origins are also Ruesona:le. We are a %er# lost s'ecies. &is can :e realied :# o:ser%ing t&e

%astE needless suCering and destrucon t&at &as &a''ened t&roug&out meE and is sll &a''ening toda#.

&e old adage goes somet&ing likeE Gif #ou do not know w&ere #ou are fromE #ou do not know w&ere #ou

are going. 0ur origins seem to :e t&e result of an e='eriment according to t&e ancient 3umerian and

Meso'otamian &istorical accounts. It cannot :e said wit& ,88_ certaint# e=actl# &ow &umanit# came to

:e as we areE :ut t&e trut& will :e re%ealed in full one da#. 9or nowE t&e most logical e='lanaon lies in

t&e Ginter%enon t&eor#. &e ancients communicated wit& &ig&l# ad%anced :eings called t&e Anunnaki.

&e# scul'ted &ierogl#'&s de'icng t&ese :eings and t&eir interacon wit& &umanit#.

Muc& of t&e informaon regarding our origins is &iddenE :ut t&is t&eor# is currentl# t&e most logical orcom'lete e='lanaon. Let it :e known t&at ,88_ 'roof of our origins does not reside in t&is :ookE and

t&at I do not claim to know t&e full trut& on t&is su:Oect. Muc& is #et to :e disco%ered and re%ealed.

Ne%ert&elessE t&e dots do connect rat&er strongl# &ereE more so t&an in ot&er t&eoriesE so I will 'roceed.

&e inter%enon t&eor# of &uman e%oluon states t&at t&e creator controlled our e%oluon to a 'ointE

and t&en our e%oluon :ecame interfered wit& :# t&e Anunnaki race menoned a:o%e. It is said t&e#

created t&e &uman animal t&roug& genec mani'ulaonE fusing t&eir own !NA wit& t&e !NA of

w&ate%er animal or life2form &umans also came from. It is t&oug&t t&at t&is could :e t&e a'eE w&ic&

would e='lain our genec similaries. It would also e='lain &ow we are similar to an a'eE #et do not

s&are a common ancestor as e='lained in t&e !arwinian Ge%oluon model. 0r ma#:e we were createdmore so from scratc& and not infused wit& t&e !NA of an a'e. Ne%ert&elessE our similaries to t&e a'e

can;t :e ignoredE e%en t&oug& we are a muc& diCerent s'ecies. Ma#:e t&e Neandert&al was a failed

e='eriment and not enoug& Anunnaki !NA was used. &ere are man# 'ossi:ilies according to t&e

inter%enon t&eor#E :ut t&e# all make more sense t&an !arwinian e%oluon and$or t&e religious

creaonist stor# t&at we were made from dirt.

NowE some ma# t&ink t&is is funn# or cra#E and I understand w&#. &e inter%enon or G". creaon

t&eor# is %er# ta:oo and not recognied or gi%en merit :# societ#. &e %er# of e=istence of

e=traterrestrials )".s* is oQen dismissed. &e t&oug&t of Galiens or an#t&ing related is laug&ed at :#

man#E :ut it is unfat&oma:le to t&ink t&at no ot&er life outside of "art& e=ists in t&e uni%erse wit& its

in>nite %astness. Logicall#E "art& cannot :e t&e onl# 'lanet t&at is &a:ita:le for life. "%en NA3A is >nding

mul'le eart&2like 'lanets wit& t&e @e'ler telesco'e. "%en if no ot&er eart&2like 'lanets e=istedE it would

:e na%e to t&ink t&at onl# life could :e su''orted &ereE or on an eart&2like 'lanet. We sim'l# cannot

know w&at ot&er life forms could li%e on and$or in.

Man# rig&Tull# askE Gw&# don;t we see t&ese :eings( &eor# suggests t&at t&e ".;s &a%e a:andoned usE

~ 26 ~



like a kind of Gcosmic a:andonment. &is could :e t&oug&t of like a 'arent a:andoning t&is c&ild. !ue to

t&e diXcult# and confusion of growing u' aloneE t&e c&ild usuall# de%elo's 's#c&ological issues. !oes

t&is not descri:e &umanit#;s current state( It seems as if we were cut oC from our origins and true 'ast.

0ur stor# seems to go :ack muc& furt&er t&an "art&E to a galacc or e%en uni%ersal origin. In 'lace of t&e

trut&E we &a%e :een taug&t a &is2stor#. His stor# is somet&ing t&at an indi%idual or grou' of men wrote.

It is a work of >conE rat&er t&an an account of our true 'ast. 0ur2stor# is muc& diCerent t&an &is2stor#.

&ere is no dou:t we &a%e :een decei%ed and lied to on man# occasions :# t&e grou's w&o control mass

informaon. &ankfull#E t&e Inter%enon t&eor# of &uman e%oluon oCers anot&er e='lanaon of ourstor# t&at :rings our s'ecies muc& closer to t&e trut&.

&he Dark Ages

&e so2called G'owers t&at :e &a%e sustained t&eir 'ower structure t&roug& t&e ignorance of t&e

masses. WeE t&e 'eo'leE gi%e our 'ower awa# to Gt&e 'owers t&at :e. 3ome call t&ese :eings t&e

GIllumina. Howe%erE t&is term is too :road and misleading. 9or a :eer descri'onE t&is :ook will use

t&e term G!ark Lords. It sounds kind of cool too &e term Glord means ruler. Howe%erE it is onl# et&ical

to rule #ourself and not an#one else. A dark lord wis&es to rule o%er ot&er :eings and 'ro'agates

dece'onE ignoranceE fearE and darkness to t&ose t&e# wis& to control.

&e dark lords are e=tremel# knowledgea:le and %er# skilled at a''l#ing t&is knowledgeE w&ic& is w&#

t&e# wield so muc& 'ower. &e old adage t&at Gknowledge is 'ower isnJt necessaril# true. It Js t&e

Ga''licaon of t&at knowledge w&ic& leads to 'ower. &e masses eit&er lack knowledge or lack t&e

inia%e to use it. More oQen t&an notE t&e# lack knowledge in general and t&is is w&# ignorance is an

e%il. Ignorance is w&# t&e dark lords &a%e so muc& 'owerE and t&e# alwa#s will if ignorance connues to

're%ail among t&e masses.

Muc& of t&e informaon of our origins is most likel# locked awa# in t&e acan secret arc&i%es in Bome.

It is esmated t&at t&ese arc&i%es contain D miles )km* of s&el%esE not counng t&e new underground

storage s'ace. ItJs t&eoried t&at man# ke# elements of our ancient 'ast &a%e :een enclosed in t&is

'lace. &e arc&i%es are &ea%il# guarded and are also a :ase for t&e dark lordsE wit& t&e Po'e and t&e

Boman +at&olic +&urc& :eing a 'art of 'ro'agang mass ignorance.

ItJs acknowledged t&at ignorance sll 're%ails toda# and t&is is w&# t&ese mes can sll :e considered

'art of t&e dark ages. Howe%erE we are coming to t&e end of t&is c#cle and t&e lig&t &as :egun to s&ine

t&roug& t&e darkness. &e me of t&e dark lords is almost u'. In t&is me and eraE we are at a maOor fork

in t&e road. "it&er we kee' walking t&e 'at& of ignorance or c&oose t&e 'at& of knowledge. &e 'at& of

knowledge leads to t&e trut&E 'owerE enE and &a''iness. &e 'at& of ignorance leads to more suCeringE

unnecessar# deat&E fearE and melanc&ol#. &e >rst ste' to o%ercoming t&is 'rison and t&e c#cle of

ignorance is to :e a seeker of trut&.

(rigins Cont+

~ 27 ~



If our stor# was told full# and trut&full#E it would :e re%ealed t&at t&ere is %irtuall# no c&ance t&at

eart&lings are t&e onl# life forms in t&e uni%erse. It would also :e na%e to assume we are t&e most

intelligent or ad%anced creatures ali%e. Kust as an ant ma# not :e a:le to understand a &umanE we ma#

not :e a:le to full# 'ercei%e a more com'le= life form. &e t&eor# of ". inter%enon wit& t&e &uman

race is also known as t&e Gancient astronaut t&eor#. 3ome of t&e ancient Meso'otamian &ierogl#'&s

actuall# de'ict :eings wit& a t#'e of suit resem:ling t&at of a s'acesuitE as well as #ing %e&icles and

590 t#'e mac&ines. It would :e erroneous to :rus& t&is e%idence oC as meaningless art or merecoincidenceE and to assume it was Oust imaginaon and entertainment for t&e ancients. W&at is :eing

'ro'osed &ere is t&at &ierogl#'&s and arfacts are communicaons of actual G&istorical accounts.

&e gods t&at man# cultures refer to in t&eir m#t&olog# can also :e seen as t&e Anunnaki. If t&oug&t on

long enoug&E one would come to t&e realiaon t&at t&e :est wa# to descri:e :eings wit& suc& ad%anced

tec&nolog#E in ancient mesE would :e as eit&er demonsE angelsE gods or de%ils. 3ome of t&ese :eings

e='ressed t&e 'ower of ig&t so t&e# were de'icted wit& &a%ing wings. `eusE t&e god of t&e sk#E

&arnessed t&e 'ower of electricit# t&roug& &is tridentE w&ic& conducted lig&tning :olts. It was descri:ed

as di%ine or su'ernatural :ecause it was not understoodE :ut it ma# &a%e :een some form of ad%anced

tec&nological wea'on. !emigods )&alf &umanE &alf god*E suc& as HerculesE were also s'oken a:out inm#t&olog# of man# cultures.

&ese :eings are also descri:ed in G&e 4ook of "noc& wit&in t&e 4i:leE w&ere it talks a:out t&e

Ne'&ilim or demigod giants t&at once roamed t&e "art&. Man# ot&er te=ts and cultures s'eak of Gt&ose

from t&e &ea%en to eart& came. +ertain as'ects in t&e 4i:le are com'letel# falseE :ut it s&ould not :e

dismissed com'letel# as a fair#tale :ook wit& no informaon on actual G&istorical accounts. +ertain

analogies Oust need to :e decoded.

Here is a :i:lical account referring to t&e &alf2Anunnaki-

<enesis 6-1 G&e Ne'&ilim were on t&e eart& in t&ose da#sE and also aQer t&atE w&en t&e sons of <od

came in unto t&e daug&ters of menE and t&e# :ore c&ildren to t&em t&e same were t&e mig&t# men t&at

were of oldE t&e men of renown.

It is im'ortant to note t&at t&e Ggods were wors&i'ed :# man#E :ut t&e wors&i'ers were decei%ed into

t&inking t&ese gods were some&ow Gdi%ine. It cannot :e said wit& suret# w&et&er t&e Anunnaki were

disagreea:le or agreea:le :eings. &e# ma# :e like &umans wit& some good and :ad. BegardlessE t&ese

:eings are not t&e creator of t&e uni%erse des'ite :eing wors&i'ed as suc&. "%en t&e Anunnaki &ad a

creator. It does not maer &ow 'owerfulE ad%ancedE or e%ol%ed a :eing is wors&i'ing an#t&ing outside

of #ourself is foll#. &ere need not :e an# wors&i'ing of :eingsE onl# res'ect for t&e good an ent# :rings

fort&. 5lmate gratude goes towards t&e source$creator of all life.

&e Anunnaki account re%eals t&at &umanit# was created as a sla%e race to mine gold for t&em. It is

t&oug&t t&at t&e# needed t&e gold for t&eir longe%it#$immortalit#E to restructure t&e atmos'&ere on

t&eir 'lanetE or for some ot&er t#'e of ad%anced tec&nolog#. &ere were two main :rot&ers w&o

go%erned t&e e='edionE "nki and "nlil. &e# connuousl# argued and dis'uted o%er t&e moralit# of t&e

~ 28 ~



w&ole ordeal. In t&e Gm#t&E "nki was t&e creator or G'rotector of &umanit#. "nki;s :rot&er "nlil

disagreed wit& "nki and t&oug&t t&at &umans were an a:ominaon and s&ouldn;t :e used for sla%e

la:or. "nlil e%entuall# com'osed a 'lan to destro# &umanit# wit& a ood. &e Anunnaki accounts almost

'arallel :i:lical accounts &ereE wit& Ggod warning Noa& of t&e ood and Noa&Js ark. &e Adam and "%e

stories in t&e <arden of "den also 'arallel t&e Anunnaki accounts of t&e creaon of t&e >rst &umans. &e

structure of our !NA is also reminiscent of a ser'ent like t&e one in t&e :i:leE w&ic& ga%e us our

knowledge or Gad%ancement in consciousness. &e knowledge of good and e%il came from our genec

mani'ulaon w&ere we :egan to &a%e c&oice$free will.

It is t&eoried t&at w&en t&e Ggods we creang our s'eciesE t&e# made a mistake and ga%e us too muc&

of t&eir own genec informaonE making us closer to t&em in terms of intelligence. &e# t&en decided to

deac%ate some of t&e !NA coding so our intelligence was at a le%el t&at would :e easier to control. It is

t&oug&t t&at t&e GOunk !NA sciensts canJt e='lain is t&e leQo%er non2ac%ated !NA t&e Anunnaki

made useless. &at would mean our GOunk !NA isnJt reall# GOunkE :ut !NA t&atJs inac%e and needs to

:e ac%ated to ser%e its 'ur'ose. If t&is is t&e caseE t&en &uman e%oluon &as great 'otenal.

&ere is muc& more informaon on t&is %er# res'ecta:le 'osion on our origins. Muc& e%idence and

researc& su''orts itE enoug& to >ll anot&er :ookE along wit& t&e e%idence against !arwinian Ge%oluon.If #ou wis& to know more a:out &uman origins t&en go into more researc& on t&e su:Oect. 0nl# :asic

informaon on &uman origins &as :een 'ro%ided &ere. &e trut& is sim'leE :ut it &as also :een &idden. It

takes muc& work to unco%er it on t&e 'art of t&ose w&o wis& to know t&e trut&. Ne%ert&elessE it is wort&

it. &e e=act e='lanaon of &uman origins ma# not :e ,88_ known as of #etE :ut t&e :est e='lanaon so

far s&ould :e acknowledged. Fuesoning w&at &as :een taug&t to us a:out our originsE and t&e status

RuoE is a great >rst ste'. NowE we s&all go into t&e stud# of moralit# and natureJs laws to de%elo' a

greater understanding of &ow im'ortant t&ese to'ics are to our life and t&e li%es of ot&ers.

~ 29 ~



Chapter ,: -atural Law

&e word Gnatural is deri%ed from t&e ancient @emean$"g#'an word Gneter. We can see t&e

similarit# :etween neter2al and natur2al. In ancient @emet neter meant Gs'irit. Natural law is also

s'iritual lawE :ecause nature is s'irit. &e word natural &as :een tainted from its original meaning. &e

conce't and statement Gnatural laws is used Ruite &ea%il# in t&e reduconist scien>c communit#.

Howe%erE t&ese laws encom'ass a muc& wider sco'e t&an w&at modern or mainstream science c&ooseto 'ercei%e. Nature is not a dead force. Nature is a li%ingE intelligent force. Nature is s'irit. All s'irit is is

li%ing intelligence. It does not im'l# t&e e=istence of a ruling godE :ut it does ins'ire :elief in a creator.

Natural law &as :een referred to as man# t&ings in &istor#. &e Law of +ause and "Cect )Gfor e%er# acon

t&ere;s an eRual and o''osite reacon and GeCect in%aria:l# follows cause*E t&e Law of Aracon )Gt&e

energ# #ou emit is t&e energ# #ou aractE Generg# ows w&ere aenon goes and Gas #ou t&inkE feel

and act so #ou s&all :e*E @arma or Moral Law )G#ou rea' w&at #ou sow*E and &e <olden Bule )Gdo

unto ot&ers as #ou would &a%e done to #ourself* or a more accurate and$or less am:iguous %ersionE Gdo

not unto ot&ers as #ou would 'refer not to &a%e done unto #ourself.

All in allE natural law &as :een knownE recogniedE and descri:ed in man# wa#s t&roug&out t&e ages.

W&en discussed in t&e conte=t of science or e=amined t&roug& t&is lensE it is usuall# acce'ted as Gcause

and eCectE :ut is somemes considered G&ocus2'ocus w&en descri:ed :# s'iritual sciences.

Ne%ert&elessE it all is essenall# t&e same t&ingE and it is crucial to recognie t&is.

&e ancient @emeans$"g#'ans were a &ig&l# ad%anced ci%iliaon t&at :uilt e=traordinar# structuresE

suc& as t&e great '#ramids of <ia. Modern arc&itects and engineers sll mar%el at t&ese structures and

understand t&at t&e# can;t :e recreated wit& our current scien>c understanding and tec&nolog#.

"g#'tologists will t&eorie t&at t&ese '#ramids were :uilt wit& sim'le stone c&iselsE ro'esE ram'sE and

man 'ower. Howe%erE t&ere is no wa# t&e# could &a%e :een constructed so 'recisel#E and wit&in t&e me

frame of construconE wit& suc& sim'le tools. &e '#ramids are also %irtuall# ,88_ 'ercent accurate in

alignment wit& t&e 0rion 3tar constellaon. 4ased on our current understanding of t&e ad%ancement of

knowledge and tec&nolog#E it would im'ossi:le to create suc& astronomical feats so long ago. A

ci%iliaon seemingl# so ad%anced for t&eir me must &a%e know man# t&ings t&at we don;t currentl#

understand in t&e da# of t&e Gmodern man. Most of w&at t&e ancients did &ad signi>cance and reason

:e&ind it. Ancient @emeans also wrote man# &ierogl#'&s on t&eir walls descri:ing de'icons of

s'iritual realiesE suc& as t&e aQer life and t&e natural law t&e# followed. It would :e unwise to disregard

t&is 'art of t&eir ci%iliaon and mistake it for imaginar# stor# created for mere entertainment. +ountless

ot&er &ig&l# ad%anced ci%iliaons &ad similar &ierogl#'&sE s#m:olsE wringsE and scul'tures t&at all

resem:le eac& ot&er. o name a few- Ancient 3umeriaE ancient Meso'otamiansE ancient AtecsE ancient

0lmecsE and ancient Ma#ans.

Ancient "g#'t$@emet followed a certain order w&ic& is also known as natural law it was t&e law of

GMa;at. Ma;at was :asicall# t&eir wa# of life and t&e s#stem :# w&ic& t&eir ci%iliaon o'erated in

&armon#. Ma;at was a goddessE :ut more so re'resented a conce't to :e understood instead of an

actual deit#. 3&e re'resented trut&E orderE and Ousce 'ersoni>ed. Ma;at literall# means Grut& in t&e

~ 30 ~



ancient @emec languageE and re'resented natural law as well. &e @emeans were in close &armon#E

understood itE acknowledged itE and res'ected its e=istence. In realit#E natural law is not some god to :e

wors&i'edE it is a uni%ersal force t&at is onl# to :e acknowledged and worked wit&. &e @emeans &ad a

s#stem of 1 'rinci'les$ideals t&at t&e# c&ose to re'resent natural law. Argua:l# t&is ci%iliaon was

greaterE more 'owerfulE and understood t&e inner workings of t&e uni%erse more so t&an our current

modern ci%iliaon does now.

0ur current societ# is starng to s'read t&e outrageous noon t&at free2will doesn;t e=ist. &is noon isstemming from t&e mainstream materialisc reduconist scien>c communit#. &e# t&ink all c&oices are

onl# t&e eCects of neural ac%it#E so our acons are essenall# a 'roduct of c&emical signals instead of

our own freedom of c&oice. Howe%erE t&is is a dece'on and is t&e result of an o%er2anal#cal leQ2:rain

im:alance. 0ur c&oices Gcause t&e neurons to >re in t&e 'aerns t&e# do. Neurons can;t Gcause or

in&i:it c&oice. If t&is was t&e case t&en t&ere was no 'oint for t&e @emeans to li%e :# t&eir 'rinci'lesE

:ecause t&e# didn;t &a%e a c&oiceE so t&e laws of Ma;at couldn;t :e followed. 4ut t&en if t&e# didn;t &a%e

a c&oiceE t&en t&e# &a%e no c&oice :ut to li%e :# t&e 'rinci'les of Ma;at.

&is :elief :ecomes reall# sill# once #ou dig dee' enoug&. Wit&out free willE t&is :ook was forced to :e

wrien and #ou &ad no c&oice in reading it. &is t&oug&t 'rocess is t&e result of insanit# and is a %irus

infecng man# minds toda#. It creates a %icm mentalit#E in w&ic& e%er#t&ing is determined :# fate and

we &a%e no control o%er our own desn# and life. Wit&out free willE someone can Ousf# t&e negaon of

res'onsi:ilit# for t&eir acons. No one would &a%e to :e moral or sto' immoralit# t&e# witnessed.

Wit&out free willE e%il could not e=ist :ecause if we no c&oice in an#t&ing t&en e%er#t&ing would :e

su:Oec%e. No one could :e &eld accounta:le for t&eir acons :ecause t&e#;re not c&oices. If t&is :elief

s'reads far enoug&E t&is world will :ecome a 'erfect world for more c&aos to reign. Natural law would

sll :e in eCectE :ut natural law does not care a:out &umanit#. It;s indiCerent or a'at&ec :ecause it is

onl# a force.

.ree#ill

9ree2will is t&e com'onent t&at :rings some randomness to our realit# and e='erience. 9ree2will is

delineated from t&at of natural law in t&at it;s not determined :# natural 'rinci'les. Howe%erE c&oices do

not esca'e t&e conseRuences of natural lawE t&ere is sim'l# no force t&at forces a c&oice to :e made. We

&a%e t&e freedom of c&oiceE :ut our c&oices are su:Oect to causal factors t&at t&en ac&ie%e t&e eCect)s*.

&ere is no set decision t&at man must makeE :ecause it would no longer :e free2will. An#one or an#

ideolog# w&ic& asserts t&at man doesn;t &a%e free2will is eit&er a decei%er or massi%el# far from t&e

trut&. "%er#one &as t&e 'ower of c&oice and free2will so don;t let an#one tell #ou ot&erwise. 9ree2will isa natural rig&t. It can :e %iolatedE :ut it is alwa#s ours to own.

It is e=tremel# im'ortant to understand t&e nature of trut&o:Oec%e moralit# :eing included wit&in

trut&:ecause man# indi%iduals greatl# limit t&emsel%es :# acce'ng t&ings t&at are not true and

disregarding w&at is conseRuentl#. !isregarding w&at is true is argua:l# more damaging. &is is referred

to as ignorance or ignoring t&e trut&. 3ome consider t&is t&e onl# real e%il. Howe%erE ignorance must :e

disnguis&ed from Gnescience.

~ 31 ~



Nescience is deri%ed from Lan wit& t&e 're>= Ne2 meaning GnotE or not 'resentE and sciereE meaning

Gto know. Nescience essenall# means to not know or :e unaware :ecause knowledge was a:sent or

not 'resent. &is is not ignoranceE :ut somet&ing una%oida:le at t&e s'eci>c me. Nescience sll &as

conseRuencesE :ut t&e main 'oint is t&at it is una%oida:le at t&e meE unlike ignorance. Ignorance

deri%es from t&e Lan %er: ignorareE meaning to not know e%en t&oug& necessar# informaon is

'resent. W&en t&e informaon is a%aila:leE :ut an indi%idual willfull# refuses or disregards itE &e &as

c&osen ignorance.

!orality

Moralit# and trut& go &and in &and. Kust as t&ere is an o:Oec%e trut&E t&ere is an o:Oec%e rig&t and

wrong. &is means rig&t and wrong are ne%er rela%e. &e# are unc&anging :ecause natural law was set

into 'lace since t&e :eginning of me or t&e creaon of t&e uni%erse. Natural LawE or moral lawE is

immuta:le and alwa#s in eCect. Natural law is not a suggesonE nor a t&eor#- it is a law.

o understand w&at is rig&t and wrongE we must >rst understanding w&at a rig&t is. &e :est wa# to do

t&is is t&roug& a'o'&ac inRuir# or aXrmaon t&roug& negaon we come to a conclusion of w&at

somet&ing is :# e='laining w&at it is not.

It;s uniRue t&at Gwrong can mean two t&ings. A wrong can mean Gmorall# unacce'ta:le or Gincorrect.

&is is :ecause t&e# are :ot& t&e same t&ing a wrong is incorrect. Incorrect means not :ased in trut&E

w&ic& is in o''osion to natural law. Acons :ased in somet&ing wrong or incorrect result in t&e &arm of

ot&er senent :eingsE w&ic& is immoral. We esta:lis&ed t&at a Grig&t is e%er#t&ing t&at a wrong is notE

so a rig&t cannot result in t&e &arm of ot&er senent :eings. A rig&t is in &armon# wit& natural lawE

:ecause it is :ased in trut& and it Oust so &a''ens t&at Grig&t also means Gcorrect. Moralit# isn;t an

im'ermanent 'aradigm :ased u'on one;s 'ers'ec%e- moralit# is a:solute and o:Oec%e rig&t and

wrong can ne%er trade 'laces.

Wit&out 'ro'er moralsE c&aos is created. No one in t&eir rig&t mind wants t&is &ence w&# e%il can :e

categoried as a mental sickness. &is mental sickness is literall# a :#'roduct of maOor leQ2:rain or rig&t2

:rain im:alances. Indi%iduals e='ressing t&ese im:alances aren;t in t&eir Grig&t or Gcorrect minds.

+&aos resides w&ere t&ere is im:alance as a result of ignorance or denial of t&e trut& and$or w&at is

rig&t or correct.

+&aosE also known as Gmanifested e%ilE occurs w&en 'eo'le use Ous>caons to falsel# make somet&ing

rig&t. Kus>caon is deri%ed from t&e Lan noun jusE meaning Grig&t law and t&e Lan %er: facereE

meaning Gto make to create. Kus>caon literall# means to Gcreate a rig&tE w&ic& is im'ossi:le :ased

on t&e 'rinci'les of natural law. Big&ts are in&erent in nature- t&e# are o:Oec%eE immuta:leE eternalE

and cannot :e created :# man.

&ere are two 'illars of enlig&tenment 'ertaining to moralit#- t&e sacred feminine )non2aggression

'rinci'le* and t&e sacred masculine )self2defense 'rinci'le*. o know t&ese and a''l# t&ese to #our life is

to trul# e=&i:it self2master#. &e sacred feminine is t&e >rst 'illar and states not to engage in %iolence.

&is means to not iniate an# wrong acon or use of '&#sical force to constrainE coerceE or com'el #our

~ 32 ~



will on anot&erE t&erefore %iolang t&e free will of anot&er :eing. &e sacred feminine is w&at a

controlling 'erson needs to learn and enact to :e a :eer indi%idual.

&e sacred masculine essenall# states- stand u' for #ourself and ot&ers w&om are :eing &armed. !oing

not&ing w&en witnessing a wrongdoing eRuates to a'at&#E and a'at&# oCers tacit com'licit# for

w&ate%er is not acted u'on. 4eing silent and non2Oudgmental is more &ateful t&an standing u' for w&at

#ou know is rig&t. All :eings &a%e t&e in&erent rig&t to use force for defending t&emsel%es against t&e

%iolence of anot&er.

New age religion is aem'ng to s&ut out t&is masculine 'rinci'leE and are onl# aiding marketers of

mass a'at&#. &e go%erning elites want t&e masses to acce't w&ate%er wrongs are occurring instead of

>g&ng for w&at is rig&t. Acce'tance is t&e main tenant :eing 'ro'agated :# t&is new age religion.

Alt&oug& acce'tance is :ene>cial in certain instancesE it is destruc%e to acce't t&e occurrence of

%iolence. Wrongdoings are unacce'ta:le and acce'ng e%il is w&at e%il wants :ecause Ge%il onl# 're%ails

w&en t&e good do not&ing.

-atural Law &ransgressions "#rongdoings$

MurderE tres'assingE ra'eE coercionE assaultE kidna''ingE im'risonmentE 'ro'ert# t&eQE and more are all

essenall# a form of t&eQ. Murder is Gtaking a :eing;s life. res'ass is Gtaking a :eing;s rig&t to

'ersonal 'ri%ac#. Ba'e is Gtaking awa# a :eing;s rig&t to :odil# safet# and control. +oercion is Gtaking a

:eing;s rig&t to make t&eir own good2willed c&oice t&roug& t&reats of &arm. Assault is Gtaking awa# a

:eing;s rig&t to :e free from 'ur'oseful '&#sical &arm. @idna' and im'risonment are Gtaking awa# a

:eing;s rig&t to &a%e :odil# autonom# and mo%e freel#. Pro'ert# t&eQ is Ruite literal in t&e sense of

Gtaking. "%er# wrong is a t&eQ in some form. &ereforeE freedom from t&ese wrongdoings are :asicall#

'ro'ert# rig&ts. &is means #our :od# and #our life are #our 'ro'ert#.

0wners&i' reRuirements include t&e rig&Tul 'ossessionE control of usageE and res'onsi:ilit#. 9or t&ose

w&om ma# Rueson if #ou can own #our :od##ou do You ma# not &a%e created #our :od# iniall#E

:ut #ou and e%er# ot&er :eing &a%e :een granted owners&i' reRuirements. No :eing &as t&e rig&t to

%iolate anot&er;s :od# and e%er# :eing &as t&e rig&t to 'rotect t&eir :od# from ot&ers aem'ng to

%iolate it. Moral law can sim'l# :e reduced to one s'iritual law- G!on;t 3teal

!oral Culpa0ility

Moral cul'a:ilit# is t&e determinaon of w&o is at fault and ulmatel# deser%ing of :lame for t&e acons

t&at result in t&e &arm or loss of ot&ers. +ul'a:ilit# is deri%ed from t&e Lan word culpaE meaning fault

and$or :lame.

Peo'le t&at commit wrong acons usuall# tr# to gi%e t&eir freedom of c&oice awa# and di%ert t&eir

res'onsi:ilit# for t&eir own acons awa#. Bat&er t&an feigning ignoranceE t&e indi%idual usuall# comes

~ 33 ~



tries to di%ert res'onsi:ilit# onto an order2gi%er. Howe%erE order2followers are e%en more guilt#$cul'a:le

t&an t&e order2gi%erE as will :e e='lained.

"%il cannot :e done if it wasn;t for t&e acce'tance and 'erformance of t&e e%il Gacon itself. &e Kewis&

Holocaust wouldn;t &a%e :een carried out if no one followed t&e orders of Hitler. Most atrocies can;t

&a''en wit&out an order2follower. An order2follower asks no Ruesons :ecause t&e# wouldn;t :e an

order2follower if t&e# did. It :ecomes im'ossi:le to consider if somet&ing is morall# correct if no

Ruesons are asked and orders are followed instantl#. &ereforeE it is wrong to follow ordersE :ecausefollowing orders lea%es out consideraon of w&at t&e morall# correct t&ing to do is.

It;s understoodE es'eciall# 'ertaining to modern 's#c&olog#E t&at 'ast trauma :uried dee' wit&in t&e

su:conscious mind can create an ent# suc& as an order2follower. &e 'erson is dealing wit& unresol%ed

trauma in a c&aoc wa#. &e 'erson usuall# is dealing wit& a:andonment issues in t&eir li%es and is

looking for a fat&er >gure or someone w&o can tell t&em w&at to do. &ese order2followers &a%e

:asicall# gi%en u' on life and decided t&e# don;t want to &a%e an# res'onsi:ilit# for t&eir acons. &us

t&e# delegate to a master. Howe%erE t&e# are deluded. &e order2follower sll carries full res'onsi:ilit#

:ecause it is im'ossi:le to delegate w&at 'ertains to natural law. &e act of gi%ing aut&orit# and control

to a master turns t&e order2follower into a mec&aniedE mindless om:ie2like :eing.

&e order2follower is a 'rogrammed mac&ine t&at is not su''osed to e=em'lif# feelings of com'assion.

0nes &umanit# is leQ out of t&e 'icture and t&e re'lian :rain takes o%er. &e onl# result t&at can come

from order2following is e%il and c&aos. We all &a%e t&e 'ower to sa# Gno. 0rder2followers e=ist

e%er#w&ere aut&orit# e=ists. 3ome of t&e :iggest current da# e=am'les are in 'olice forcesE cultsE gangsE

cor'oraonsE certain sociees and fraternal ordersE and t&e militar#.

-atural Law versus !an1s Law

Man;s law is c&ild;s 'la# in com'arison to nature;s law. Nature doesn;t care if man doesn;t want

somet&ing to &a''en Oust consider natural disasters. Man could make a law outlawing &urricanesE :ut

&urricanes will sll come. Plans don;t maer eit&er. ParadesE weddingsE and :eac& %acaons get rained

on. Ho'efull# t&is alone s&ows t&e 'ower of nature is unsto''a:le and %astl# out of t&e control of man.

Man;s law will alwa#s :e inferior and su:ser%ient to natural law.

Man;s law is made u' in t&e mind of manE w&ile natural law is in&erent in nature. Natural law is eternal

and immuta:leE w&ile man;s law is im'ermanent and su:Oect to c&ange. &e 'rinci'les t&at are t&e

foundaon of man;s law essenall# mean t&at it is not :ased in trut& :ecause t&e trut& is o:Oec%e and

eternal. Natural law is 'redicated u'on t&e 'rinci'le of trut& and is in&erent to creaon. Man;s law is

:ased u'on constructs of t&e mind and dogmac :eliefs. Man;s law is usuall# com'lied wit& under

duress and fear of 'unis&mentE w&ile natural law can onl# :e &armonied wit& using knowledge and

'ro'er understanding. Natural law is inde'endent of locaon and meE w&ereas man;s law is de'endent

u'on t&ese. Man;s law c&anges at t&e w&im of t&e legislators w&o enact t&ese laws and t&e %otersE

w&ic& means we consider morals rela%isc. &is is 'art of t&e cause of our suCering.

~ 34 ~



Conscience

o &a%e a conscience is to &a%e common sense. +onscience is deri%ed from t&e Lan 're>= con2 meaning

Gtoget&er and t&e Lan %er: sciereE meaning Gto know to understand. &ereforeE conscience literall#

means Gto know toget&er. "='ressing conscience is :eing in &armon# wit& common knowledge or t&e

common sense of natural lawE w&ic& reRuires knowing t&e o:Oec%e diCerence :etween rig&t and

wrong. It s&ould not &a%e to :e taug&tE :ecause we are :orn in&erentl# knowing w&at is rig&t andwrong. Howe%erE somew&ere along t&e line of our de%elo'mentE we &a%e :een decei%edE 'rogrammedE

mani'ulatedE and t&erefore confused a:out t&e 'rinci'les of moralit# and 'ro'er et&ics. Humanit# was

taug&t t&at rig&t and wrong doesn;t maer in certain instancesE so it &as :egun to :e considered rela%e

in man# situaons. We must detac& from t&at 'rogramming and :egin to remem:er w&at we alread#

knew at one 'oint in our li%es- t&e o:Oec%e diCerence :etween rig&t and wrong.

2overnment ' -atural Law

9irst of allE go%ernment deals in legal %ersus illegalE w&ic& &as no correlaon to rig&t %ersus wrong.

!es'ite :eing used s#non#mousl#E t&ese are two com'letel# diCerent 'aradigms. <o%ernment &as

unlawfull# tricked us into :elie%ing t&at legal and illegal is rig&t and wrong. &e fact t&at laws c&ange

o%er me and %ar# :etween states s&ows t&at t&e# do not reect moralit# :ecause t&e trut& is o:Oec%e.

&e go%ernment &as also tricked usE naonal and glo:al ciensE into :elie%ing t&at t&e# &a%e Ourisdicon

o%er us. Kurisdicon is deri%ed from t&e Lan noun jus or juris meaning GlawE and t&e Lan %er: dictareE

meaning Gto s'eak to sa#. Kurisdicon means to sa# w&at is law. "%er#one &as t&e rig&t of freedom of

s'eec&E so Ourisdicon s&ould not :e restricted or 'ri%ileged to onl# t&e go%ernment. 9urt&ermoreE

s'eaking t&e law s&ould onl# :e to informE not to dictate. Howe%erE t&is would :e redundant and

unnecessar# if e%er#one knew natural laws. &e fact t&at t&ere is Ourisdicon s'eaks to t&e realit# t&at'eo'le &a%e lost touc& wit& t&eir in&erent knowledge of rig&t and wrongE and t&eir connecon to

natural law.

4ecause natural law is t&e onl# true lawE laws dictated :# t&e go%ernment s&ould :e ,88_ in accordance

and alignmentE ot&erwise t&e# deser%e to :e diso:e#ed or disregarded. 5nfortunatel#E t&e s'eaking and

wring of lawsE or OurisdiconE isn;t Oust to inform. &e go%ernmentE w&o claims t&is rig&tE does so to

unlawfull# force 'eo'le to conform to t&eir own lawsE w&ic& is in direct o''osion to natural law. Not

onl# do t&e# create and enforce lawsE :ut t&e# claim t&at man# of t&eir acons are Grig&ts. W&at &as

&a''ened is t&at a grou' of 's#c&o'at&s &a%e deemed t&emsel%es wort&# to enforce lawsE t&at t&e#

created to su''ort t&eir own 'ower structure and &a%e goen t&e masses of 'eo'le to :elie%e t&at t&ego%ernment is legimate in %iolentl# enforcing t&eir will on ot&ers.

&is dece'on &as in>ltrated our minds so dee'l# t&at some of us e%en feel guilt w&en we don;t com'l#

wit& legal statutes or man;s law. Patrioc 'ro'aganda turns into fundamental social :eliefs if 'us&ed for

long enoug& :# t&e media t&roug& t&e well2known tacc of &#'nosis Gendless re'eon. 0ne great

e=am'le of t&is was Nai <erman# and t&e t&ird Beic&. If #ou &a%e an aut&orita%eE or res'ected grou'

of 'eo'leE sa#ing somet&ing long enoug& incessantl# e%entuall#E 'eo'le will :egin to :elie%e itE e%en it

~ 35 ~



it;s not true. AlsoE t&e :igger t&e lieE t&e more 'ower it &as to fool. &e KewsE and ot&er races were

connuousl# demonied unl it :ecame mass :elief. Acons classi>ed as legal were not necessaril# rig&t

acons classi>ed as illegal were not necessaril# wrong eit&er. &e Legal %s. Illegal facade is onl# a s#stem

used to 'rotect t&e interests of t&e go%erning elites. &e genocide of t&e Kews was legal &ereE :ut not

rig&t. &e genocide of man# ot&er 'eo'les are also considered to :e legal :# t&e ruling go%ernments

carr#ing it out at t&e me. Anot&er e=am'le is t&e genocide of t&e na%e Americans.

<o to t&e origin and et#molog# of t&e word Ggo%ernmentE and #ou;ll >nd out t&e word literall#

translates to GMind +ontrol. <o%ern comes from t&e Lan %er: gubernareE meaning Gto control. And

t&e Lan noun mensE meaning Gmind. &is et#mological :reakdown of go%ernment is oQen de:ated and

askedE Gw&# isn;t it deri%ed from t&e suX= 2ment( Howe%erE it;s o:%ious w&# t&e "nglis& language c&ose

a word meaning Gmind to construct t&e word go%ernment. Mind also means Gt&e state of and

go%ernment is also oQen referred to as Gt&e state. 9or somet&ing to e=ist in t&e material realit#E it must

>rst e=ist in t&e mind. &is 'rinci'le will :e e='lained in muc& more detail in t&e c&a'ter discussing t&e

uni%ersal laws.

!orality 3upports .reedom

9or a societ# to e='erience 'eaceE 'eo'le must understand and 'racce natural$moral law. #rann# and

sla%er# are in%ersel# 'ro'oronal to t&e social 'resence of moralit#. Less moralit# eRuates to more

suCering. A societ# t&at em:races moral rela%ism will ne%er &a%e freedom.

It is common knowledge t&at moral rela%ism e=ists in all aut&orita%e s#stemsE w&ic& em:race statutesE

ordinancesE and codesE and use terms suc& as Glegal and illegal. Legal and illegal onl# :ene>ts t&e

go%erning aut&ories in t&e ruling class. W&et&er it;s :elie%ed or notE all go%ernments ser%e a ruling

classE including democracies. &e reason for t&is is :ecause all go%ernments claim to &a%e t&e aut&orit#

to dictate w&at 'eo'le can doE w&ic& is a %iolaon of free will and natural law. No go%erning :od# or'erson &as t&e rig&t to tell anot&er w&at t&e# can and cannot doE and t&en t&reaten coercion if t&e

indi%idual does not com'l#. "%er#one does &a%e t&e rig&tE &owe%erE of self2defense and defense of

ot&ers w&ose rig&ts are :eing %iolated.

&he Child in 4umanity

+&ildren are incredi:l# intelligentE :ut it is not in t&is sense t&at &umanit# acts. Humanit# acts as c&ildren

in t&e &el'less sense. 0ne could sa# t&at our consciousness is underde%elo'ed. &is is mainl# :ecausewe are collec%el# scaredE 'arcularl# of t&e unknown. It is t&is fear t&at causes us to delegate our rig&ts

awa# in e=c&ange for su''osed safet# or defense. We are :orn into sla%er#E and in our ina:ilit# to see

t&at we can :reak freeE we gi%e u' our freedom.

G&ose w&o surrender freedom for securit# will not &a%eE nor do t&e# deser%eE eit&er one. 2 4enOamin

9ranklin

~ 36 ~



&he Political Answer for .reedom

Anarc&#- no rulersE dictators or masters. No o''ressors.

Anarc&# is deri%ed from t&e <reek 're>= 2an meaning Gwit&outE t&e a:sence ofE and t&e <reek noun

ArchonE meaning Gmaster ruler. Anarc&# doesn;t mean wit&out laws or rules it literall# means wit&out

rulers. A societ# can &a%e rules and laws t&at re'resent natural lawE :ut a societ# does not need rulers to

enforce t&ese rules. Natural law sim'l# enforces itself :# wa# of cause and eCect.

How will Anarc&# :e esta:lis&ed in societ#( 3elf2go%ernance must >rst :e esta:lis&ed among t&e masses.

W&en 'eo'le free t&emsel%es :# seeingE t&inkingE and acng :ased on natural law t&en e=ternal

dominion can no longer remain. As 'eo'le :ecome more self2aware and conscienousE anarc&# will

naturall# rise.

-atural Law E5pressions

LetJs start wit& t&e nega%e. W&at we use to create in t&e nega%e genera%e 'olarit# is fear. 9ear is

unconsciousnessE w&ic& iniates ignorance or t&e denial of trut&. Ignorance leads to t&e internal

e='ression of confusionE w&ere #ou are at war wit& #ourself :ecause #ou are not in control of #ourself

an internal state of anarc&#. &is internal confusion and lack of control results in one wanng to control

w&ate%er t&e# can e=ternall#. An e=ternal monarc&# is created. &is e=ternal control results in

manifested e%il$c&aos.

W&at we use to create in t&e 'osi%e genera%e 'olarit# is lo%e. It is re'resented :# e='anding

consciousness :ecause lo%e iniates learning or :uilding knowledgeE w&ic& is t&e acce'tance of trut&.@nowledge leads to t&e internal e='ression of so%ereignt#E w&ere #ou are t&e ruler of #ourself and &a%e

com'lete control. An internal monarc&# is created. 4eing t&e master of #ourself results in true freedomE

and t&ere:# fosters an e=ternal anarc&#. W&en one realies s$&e can onl# control t&emsel%esE not

e=ternal e%entsE t&e# no longer incite %iolence u'on ot&ers. 9reedom results in manifested good$order.

(ur (rigins and the Acceptance of 3lavery

As descri:ed in t&e 're%ious c&a'terE it seems t&at since our origins as a s'eciesE we &a%e :een in:ondage :# :eings claiming to :e our rulers. If we were created as a sla%e raceE it would make sense w&#

so man# of us em:race su:mission to aut&orit#. It must &a%e :ecome a 'art of our 's#c&olog# to

em:race aut&orit# aQer ages of o:e#ing.

It seems t&at t&e Ggods &anded down to us s#stems of control t&e# created to kee' &umanit# at :a#

wit&out t&e need for constant enforcementE like gi%ing a c&ild a nann# if t&e 'arents are oQen gone.

~ 37 ~



&ese s#stems of control were mone#E go%ernmentE and religion. WeE in essenceE agreed to kee'

oursel%es in c&eck :# acce'ng t&ese control s#stems as legimate and necessar#. We sllE toda#E are

consenng.

In6inite Possi0ility

If we want to e='erience freedom as a s'eciesE we need to em:race in>nite 'ossi:ilit#E including t&e

'ossi:ilit# of c&aos. In>nite 'ossi:ilit# includes c&aosE :ut t&e fear of it will onl# lead to more c&aos. 9ear

is literall# c&aos in and of itselfE so w&ate%er results out of t&at fear will :e more c&aoc t&an em:racing

t&e 'ossi:ilit#.

Peo'le fear w&at would &a''en if t&ere was no go%ernment and if t&ere was no:od# to 'rotect t&em.

Howe%erE t&e go%ernment knows t&at it is not t&eir rig&t to 'rotect usE :ut t&e 'eo'le;s rig&t to 'rotect

t&emsel%es. &e go%ernment claimsE dece'%el#E to :e our 'rotector. YetE ironicall#E t&e go%ernment is

actuall# t&e 'er'etrator of muc& of t&e crime t&at e=ists in t&is world. It is t&e distri:utor of goods and

ruler of marketsE t&e creator of 'ri%ilege and 'o%ert#. &is is one factor t&at causes 'eo'le to li%e in a

constant state of sur%i%al or fear of losing w&at t&e# &a%e and :eing reduced to t&e sur%i%al state of

e=istence.

Progress doesn;t &a''en during a state of fear or scarcit#E wit& aut&ories telling 'eo'le w&at do and

t&reatening t&em. rue 'rogress e=ists in a:undance and in>nite 'ossi:ilit#. In realit#E t&e fear of c&aos is

t&e fear of freedom. &e go%ernment uses tools of sla%er# and t&reats of im'risonment in order to force

'eo'le to conform to t&eir will t&is is c&aosE t&e e=act t&ing 'eo'le are li%ing in fear of.

G&ere is onl# one true di%ide t&at se'arates &umanit# into two disnct t#'es of indi%iduals. &e

criterion for t&is di%ide is w&et&er or not an indi%idual :elie%es in Gaut&orit#E and t&erefore :elie%e t&at

t&ere is legimac# to sla%er#. 2 Mark Passio

~ 38 ~



Chapter 7: #ho are 8ou

GHeed t&ese wordsE #ou w&o wis& to 'ro:e t&e de't& of nature- If #ou do not >nd wit&in #ourself t&at

w&ic& #ou seekE neit&er would #ou >nd it outside of #ourself. If #ou ignore t&e wonders of #our own

&ouseE &ow do e='ect to >nd ot&er wonders( In #ou is &idden t&e treasures of treasures. @now t&#selfE

and #ou will know t&e uni%erse and t&e gods. 2 An inscri'on ari:uted to t&e oracle P#t&ia at t&e

em'le of A'ollo in !el'&i <reece

Muc& 'ower comes t&roug& understanding w&o #ou are. o do t&isE it must :e esta:lis&ed t&at #ou are a

so%ereign :eing. &e word so%ereign is deri%ed from t&e Lan ad%er: super meaning Ga:o%e and t&e

Lan noun regnum w&ic& means Grulers&i' control. 3o%ereign means a:o%e control or rulers&i' of

anot&er. "%er# li%ing :eingE wit&out e=ce'onE on t&is 'lanet and in t&e uni%erse is a so%ereign. &is is

due to natural law :ecause of t&e rig&ts all li%ing :eings 'ossess. &ere is no legimate owners&i' o%er

anot&er so no :eing s&ould :e a sla%e.

8ou are In6inite

!eat& is a common fear t&at we all get at some me during our li%es. We fear deat& sim'l# :ecause we

don;t understand it. 3ome t&ink t&at we Oust cease to e=ist w&en we GdieE s'eci>call# w&en our material

:odies cease to funcon. W&en t&at &a''ensE w&at is It like( Is a cease in our conscious awareness e%en

logical( W&at we can currentl# o:ser%e is consciousnessE :ut t&e end of consciousness cannot :e

e='erimented u'on.

[Bealit# is 'art of logical s'ace. &ings must :e logicall# 'ossi:le for it to e=ist e%en if we cannot sense

it.[ 2 Wigenstein

I am not assuring #ou t&at we will kee' our e=act same consciousness in t&e GaQer2life w&en weE our

'&#sical :odiesE sto' funconing and we Gdie. Ma#:e our life as we know it will cease and our

consciousness will reincarnate into t&e :irt& of anot&er &umanE non2&uman animalE or e%en an "..

Ma#:e our consciousness will :ecome one wit& t&e consciousness of t&e "art&$<aiaE or ma#:e e%en t&e

source. W&at e=actl# &a''ens wit& our consciousness aQer our current material :od# dies cannot :e

s'oken a:out wit& ,88_ suret#. W&at is known is t&at our awareness and consciousness will alwa#s :e

t&ere. It will c&angeE :ut it will ne%er cease. &e idea t&at our consciousness ceases to e=ist is not :ased

in an# logical realit#.

0ne of t&e main ideas 'ro'agated :# t&e mainstream Gscien>c communit# is t&at consciousness is

onl# a 'roduct of our :rain and t&us w&en we Gdie we cease to e=ist. Howe%erE &ow could non2e=istence

:e logical( You ma# not :elie%e in t&e #ing s'ag&eZ monsterE :ut #ou can at least imagine or Gsee a

#ing s'ag&eZ monster in t&e mind. +an #ou e%en 'icture w&at non2e=istence looks like( +an non2

e=istence e%en :e de>ned( +an an#one draw a 'icture of non2e=istence( 3ome ma# sa#E Gwell w&at

a:out t&e creator t&en( &e answer would :e in t&at t&e creator can :e seen and e='erienced all

~ 39 ~



around #ou. &e source is in t&e treesE t&e :reeeE t&e landsca'eE t&e sk#E t&e :irdsE t&e :eesE #ouE meE

and e%er#one else. W&ere is non2e=istence(

Non2e=istence is 'seudoscience :ecause it cannot :e e='erienced or o:ser%ed :# t&e scien>c met&od.

It is a [:elief[ and reRuires [fait&[ to :elie%e in suc& a realit#E or non2realit#. I am not %ilif#ing or

ridiculing science and its accom'lis&ments I;m 'oinng out t&at science is se%erel# awed and

contradicts itself maOorl#. 9ollowing t&e science of man reRuires as muc& fait&E if not moreE t&an religion.

&is scien>c fait& is called [sciensm. Intelligence is a :alance :etween t&e two e=tremes of :lind fait&and ske'cism. Intelligence is Gintellect V intuion and cannot :e e='ressed if someone onl#

e=em'li>es one of t&ese enes- Intelligence is :alance.

If we are to o%ercome t&e tra'E t&e 'risonE and t&e c#cle of ignoranceE we must in :e in :alance and :e a

seeker of trut&. &is is a 'at& of knowledge wit&out fear. &ere is a certain order in w&ic& t&is :ook must

'resent t&is message. 9irst and foremost is t&e knowledge of self knowing t&at #ou are an in>nite :eing

and knowing w&o #ou are internall#. @nowing w&o #ou are is t&e :asis to knowing lifeE t&e mindE t&e

&eartE and &a''iness.

#hat are 8ou

You are not #our :od#. You are not #our armsE torsoE faceE or e%en #our :rain. &e G#ou t&at is #our

'ersonalit# and t&oug&ts is intangi:le. &is #ou is immaterial. It is com'osed of 'ure

consciousness$energ#E and as "instein saidE Generg# cannot :e created nor destro#ed. You alwa#s e=ist

and can ne%er trul# die. Your current e='erience is im'ermanentE in t&at it can endE :ut t&ere;s alwa#s a

new :eginning. &e :od# can dieE :ut #ou as t&e mind$s'irit can ne%er die. "nerg# onl# c&anges form.

&ese :od# 'arts t&at we use are onl# tools to o'erate in t&is material world.

It is a leQ2:rain im:alance and su:seRuent t&oug&t 'aerns suc& as materialism w&ic& result in t&e

erroneous line of reasoning t&at we Gare our :rain. It;s a 'roduct of a 'urel# intellectual mind t&at can;t

see t&e :igger 'ictureE :ecause t&is 'erce'on ulies %er# lile imaginaon and intuionE w&ic& is

necessar# to e='ress true intelligence.

We &a%e t&ese :od# 'arts or GtoolsE :ut we are not t&em. We use a :rainE :ut we are not our :rain. You

seeE t&e realit# is in our e%er#da# language. We sa# we G&a%e a :rain and we Guse our :rainE :ut &ow

can we &a%e somet&ing and use itE if we are t&at somet&ing( It would :e a :it like sa#ing a com'uter &as

a com'uterE w&en we know t&at reall# a com'uter is a com'uter. It take a 'ersonal agent to use and own

t&e com'uter. We must :e more t&an t&e somet&ing in Rueson to G&a%e or Guse it. &e trut& is t&atwe are t&e G&a%er and Guser of our :rain. Let;s us :e intelligent and use our :rains &ere.

&e :rain is Oust a tool t&at we use to o'erate and funcon in t&is ! material realit#. If someone uses it

or t&inks wit& it t&en t&e# &a%e to :e acknowledged as real. W&o is t&is someone( &is someone is our

true intangi:le immuta:le self. It is t&e master controller :e&ind e%er#t&ingE e%en t&e :rain. It;s also kind

of like sa#ing a car'enter is &is saw. NoE t&e saw is Oust a tool t&at &e uses to cut woodE and it;s sill# to

t&ink t&at t&e tool is a li%ing :eing. &inking consciousness is Oust a construct of t&e :rain is like t&inking

~ 40 ~



is ca:le. W&en t&e :reaksE t&e ca:le doesn;t cease to e=ist. Plug t&e ca:le into a new E and

'rograms can :e :roadcasted and watc&ed. &e ca:le 'rogramming is somet&ing e=ternal and needs

a '&#sical medium to :e c&anneled t&roug&. We do not cease to e=ist w&en we dieE Oust like

:roadcasts doesn;t cease to e=ist w&en a :reaks. 0ur true self is t&e userE not w&at;s :eing used. You

are not #our :od#. You are a 'art of t&e sourceE G&e All.

&he All

G&e All is mind. Intelligence is mind. You are a 'art of it. Not&ing can e=ist outside G&e AllE :ecause

t&en it wouldnJt :e G&e All. 3ince #ou e=ist inside G&e AllE #ou are essenall# a 'iece of G&e All and

t&erefore G&e All simultaneousl#. &ere is 'risne knowledge in t&e ancient &ermec teac&ing Gas

a:o%e so :elowE as :elow so a:o%e. It can :e a :it confusing at >rstE :ut #ou are essenall# t&e uni%erse

:ecause #ou are a 'art of it.

5sing an analog#E t&e original source or G&e All started out like a %ase and t&en decided to se'arate

itself into %arious units of consciousness. We are all Oust 'ieces of t&is %aseE :ut we are all sll t&e %ase.

&e AllE for t&e ad&erers to religionE is w&ic& #ou would call god. &is is not to sa# t&at #ou are not

welcome to learn from t&ese teac&ings if #ou are religious or irreligious. "%er#one is welcome of e%er#

religion or creed. 4ut :ecause t&e word god is misleadingE man# interc&angea:le terms will :e used for

G<odE suc& as- NatureE G&e AllE t&e sourceE and t&e uni%erse.

In essenceE #ou are 'art of t&e uni%erse and are t&e uni%erse simultaneousl#. You are :asicall# god. You

are not t&e god of ot&er :eings #ou rule #ourself w&en in &armon# wit& t&e uni%ersal lawsE w&ic& we

will discuss in t&e ne=t c&a'ter.

How does t&at feel( "=traordinaril# em'owering(

GWe are a wa# for t&e cosmos to know itself. 2 +arl 3aganE famous astro'&#sicist and aut&or

Energy

It;s a :it less com'licated to e='lain w&at we are made u' of t&an to e='lain our origins. rut&full#E we

ma# not &a%e an origin :ecause we e=ist as 'ure conscious energ#. &e >rst law of t&ermod#namics

states t&at energ# can neit&er :e created nor destro#ed.

"nerg# is in>nite :ecause energ# is e%er#t&ing in t&e uni%erseE G&e All. "%en material maer is energ#E

Oust a more dense form of it. If we remem:er :ack to grade sc&ool scienceE we recollect t&at t&ere are

diCerent forms of maer. "ac& &as its own moleculesE atomsE and electrons %i:rang at diCerent s'eeds.

&e densest forms of maer mo%e t&e slowest and t&e &ig&er t&e %i:raon t&e less dense t&e maer. If

we go in order from most dense to least it would :e- solidsE liRuidsE gasesE and 'lasma. &is sim'le

~ 41 ~



conce't deri%es from :asic c&emistr#.

5sing t&is understandingE we can see t&at maer is neit&er created nor destro#ed. According to t&e >rst

law of t&ermod#namicsE w&ic& is a uni%ersal '&#sical lawE it onl# c&anges form. IceE a solidE is not

destro#ed w&en t&e molecules s'eed u' and G&eat to melt into liRuid. Ice does not %anis& into t&in air.

&e ice onl# c&anges form. As #ou can seeE ice &as t&e same 'ro'eres of energ# :ecause it is energ#.

Maer is energ# and energ# is maer. We can onl# 'ercei%e oursel%es as material wit& our >%e senses of

sig&tE smellE touc&E tasteE and sound. Howe%erE we are muc& more t&an meets t&e e#e- we are in>nite

Anot&er analog# would :e to com'are our :od# to a cu'E and our consciousness to t&at of t&e water

inside t&e cu'. urn t&e cu' u'side down and t&e water s'ills out. W&ere did t&e water go( !id t&e

water cease to :e( If we look on t&e groundE we would see t&at t&e water is sll waterE it &as Oust lost its

container.

As immaterial energec :eingsE we &a%e e=traordinar# 'ower. &e is no limit 'ertaining to energ#.

Howe%erE t&e funconing material :od# &as its limits. It gets inOured o%er me and deteriorates in old

age. 0ur energec :od# is a diCerent stor#E t&oug&. We can use it to ta' into in>nite intelligenceE to

reOu%enate &ow we feelE create our realit#E and among man# ot&er t&ings not generall# t&oug&t of to :e

'raccal. &e geniuses t&at we t&ink are smarter t&an t&e maOorit# are in fact not smarter t&an t&e ne=t

'erson no one is smarter t&an anot&er. As t&e sa#ing goes G!o not Oudge a >s& :# its a:ilit# to clim: a

tree. &e geniuses Oust &a%e t&e a:ilit# to ta' into in>nite intelligence and$or t&e# &a%e mastered a skill

t&at com'lements t&eir own nature. A sRuirrel will seem like a genius among ot&er animals if t&e test is

clim:ing trees.

&ere is a 'o'ular sa#ing t&at &umans onl# use ,8_ of our :rains. A''arentl# it &as :een de:unked :#

modern neurosciensts w&o claim we use our full ,88_. &e# actuall# &a%e 'ersuasi%e and conclusi%e

e%idence to :ack t&is u'. 9or e=am'leE all regions of t&e :rain lig&t u' during roune dail# tasks as

s&own t&roug& :rain image scanning. 9urt&ermoreE :rain damage &as signi>cant eCects on our cogni%e

a:ilit#. 9or e=am'leE %icms of stroke are maOorl# im'aired aQerwards due to t&e :rain damage caused

:# lack of o=#gen to t&e :rain. If we onl# use ,8_ of our :rains t&en w&# would stroke %icms :ecome

drascall# im'aired :# :rain damage(

&is is logical reasoningE :ut w&o said intelligence and &uman 'otenal originates solel# from t&e :rain(

How is it t&at some 'eo'le can seem e=tremel# or a:normall# intelligent( Are t&e# using 88_ of t&eir

:rains( &is conclusion would :e ludicrous. &ere is onl# one ot&er e='lanaonE w&ic& is t&at t&e :rain is

:ut a Gtool to o'erate in t&is world. We are :ut a Gg&ost in a mac&ineE as a '&iloso'&er :# t&e name of

<il:ert B#le descri:es it. Alt&oug& &e was mocking t&e ideaE t&is is w&at a s'irit :eing t&e Guser of t&e

:od# essenall# is. A s'irit can also :e considered a Gmind or a direct access to in>nite intelligenceE if

#ou will. 0ur :odies are a s&ell t&at dies and wit&ers awa#E :ut t&ere is somet&ing intangi:le t&at

o'erates it. &is :eing animates t&e material :od# and gi%es it life. We are t&e &uman animal. Animal is

deri%ed from t&e Lan word animaE w&ic& means G:reat&E and :reat& re'resents t&e s'irit or soul.

Would it :e smart to walk in front of a trainE :ecause #ou know t&at #ou are an in>nite :eing( No. 4ut

#ou must :e a:le to :elie%e in t&e unt&inka:le. 9or e=am'le- Walking t&roug& a wall is almost

unfat&oma:leE :ut to accom'lis& dreams #ou must :e a:le to :elie%e t&at t&e Gim'ossi:le can occur.

&at it is at least a 'ossi:ilit# in #our mindE in w&ic& an#t&ing can &a''en. &e 'ast is not a determinant

~ 42 ~



of t&e 'resent or t&e futureE so literall# an#t&ing in t&e 'resent moment &as t&e 'ossi:ilit# of &a''ening.

"nerg# is in>niteE and #ou are energ#E t&erefore #ou are in>nite. &ere are in>nite 'ossi:iliesE Oust as

#ou are in>nite.

+ountless socieesE religionsE '&iloso'&iesE and sc&ools of t&oug&t understood t&is. &e ancient

"g#'ans$@emeans :elie%ed in t&e aQerlife w&ile 4udd&ists and Hindus :elie%ed in reincarnaon. &e

Na%e American tri:es :elie%ed in a s'irit. &ere are countless e=am'les of 'ast 'eo'les understanding

t&is uni%ersal trut& t&at t&e# were in&erentl# energ# and can ne%er trul# die. &ese sociees e='ressed

t&is knowledge in a less scien>c and less linear mannerE :ut t&e# knew ne%ert&eless.

3cience is Oust now :eginning to com're&end w&at ci%iliaons &a%e known since t&e :eginning of me.

Fuantum '&#sics is argua:l# t&e area of science making t&e :iggest lea's 'ertaining to Gdisco%ering t&e

Gunseen. Fuantum '&#sicsE also known as Ruantum mec&anicsE is t&e stud# of t&e interacons :etween

energ# and maer. Man# t&eories &a%e :een 'ostulated :# t&is scienceE suc& as me tra%elE mul'le

dimensionsE and t&e a:ilit# t&at t&e mind alone &as t&e 'ower to aCect t&e interacon of 'arcles.

Muc& of t&is would :e la:eled as 'seudoscience :# ignorant and closed2minded 'ersons. Howe%erE

muc& of t&ese t&eories originate from &ig&l# res'ecta:le and re'uta:le men. Al:ert "instein is one of

t&e largest &ouse&old names in science and was a Ruantum '&#sicist. In t&e 'astE man# regarded t&is

man as cra# for &is radical ideas and e='ressionE :ut now &is mind and work is legendar#.

&e :iggest lie is t&at t&e >%e senses let us e='erience all t&at t&ere is to realit#. How is it t&at science is

Oust now coming to gri's wit& t&e trut& t&at t&ere is muc& moreE w&en diCerent ci%iliaons scaered

across t&e world came to t&ese same conclusions long ago( &is knowledge is em:edded wit&in our

!NAE :ut ignorance &as 'er'etuated for millenniums now. &ankfull# 'eo'le are waking u'. ItJs not onl#

at&eists t&at donJt realie t&e 'ower t&at t&e# &oldE :ut itJs most of t&e religious folk as well.

9nowing 8ourself ' Distractions

&ere are so man# distracons t&at :arrage us e%er# da#E t&at we :arel# get a c&ance to &ear our own

inner2%oice. &e dark lords consider distracon one of t&eir main wea'ons. If we are distracted enoug&

from oursel%es t&en we will ne%er know w&o we are or :e a:le to ulie our 'otenal. &e masses are

ooded wit& misinformaon t&roug& man# meansE suc& as tele%ision and ot&er forms of media.

ele%ision is a :ig distracon :ecause it engrosses t&e senses and all le%els of t&e &uman mindE and

:egins to 'rogram us t&roug& t&e su:conscious. &is 'rogram &as t&e a:ilit# to inuence t&e &uman to a

great degree. It is surel# not a coincidence t&at tele%ision s&ows are called G 'rograms.

&e ele%ision generall# Gtells lies to #our %ision :# in>ltrang t&e su:conscious mind wit& t&e 'rogram.

&e %iewer usuall# ends u' 'la#ing out t&e emoons and$or acons t&at were taken in su:consciousl#.

&e %iewer doesnJt realie t&at t&e# are doing t&is :ecause t&e 'rograming is so su:tle. &is is w&at

makes it so eCec%e and dangerous. &e tele%ision works as a form of mind control and &as :een used

as suc& since its in%enon. &e >rst commerciall# manufactured tele%ision set was manufactured in

<erman#. <erman# was also t&e worldJs >rst countr# to run regular ser%icesE w&ic& were used

e=tensi%el# to s'read Nai 'ro'aganda. Wit&out t&e tele%isionE Nai <erman# ma# &a%e not :een w&at it

was. Ho'efull# t&is gi%es insig&t into &ow 'owerful t&is de%ice is. It &as t&e 'ower to swa# masses :#

~ 43 ~



dum:ing t&em down wit& 'ro'agandaE stereot#'icalE and content t&at is wort&less in reall# smulang

t&e mind to learn and grow.

NowE t&is is not to sa# t&e tele%ision is in&erentl# e%il. &is :ook ne%er 'reac&es an#t&ing dogmacE and

it;s acknowledged t&at t&e tele%ision &as its construc%e uses as wit& educaonal s&ows or mo%ies wit&

a good moral to t&e stor#E :ut e%en t&ese t#'es of content &a%e :een tainted. 4eing cauous w&en it

comes to tele%ision is a must #ou must discard t&e 4.3. If #ou must watc& tele%isionE I suggest #ou sta#

awa# from t&e 'rogramsE w&ic& includes t&e regular wit& commercials or ca:le$satellite . &iswould mean #ou use t&e tele%ision for t&e sole 'ur'ose of a %iewing de%ice to watc& mo%ies or ot&er

content t&at are not 'rograms. &is ma# seem confusingE :ut #ou can :e #our own :est Oudge &ere. Is

t&e content in Rueson going to e%ol%e #our consciousness or is it not going to &old #ou :ack in #our

Oourne#( Are #ou managing #our me correctl#( Instead of watc&ing tele%isionE is t&ere somet&ing else

t&at needs to get done and t&at deser%es more focus( r# to :e true to #ourself a:out w&et&er #ou

s&ould :e watc&ing tele%ision or not. Is t&e content to smulate #our :rain and cul%ate #our mind(

3ome indi%iduals &a%e t&rown out t&eir tele%ision and e='ressed e=traordinar# :ene>ts. !oing t&is is not

a must to grow and 'rogress along #our Oourne#E :ut if #ou get rid of itE #ou can sll watc& content on

#our com'uter or go to t&e mo%ies.

Music is anot&er form of media t&at can kee' #ou 'rogrammed in a wa# t&at kee's #ou from >nding

#ourself. Music is %er# 'owerful in aCecng t&e mindE es'eciall# t&e su:conscious and emoons of a

'erson. Music &as t&e a:ilit# to :ring fort& angerE sadnessE de'ressionE or aid in creang Oo#E e=citementE

and com'assion. &e :est wa# to know if a form of music is going to :e of :ene>t to #our mind is to :e

aware of &ow it makes #ou feel. If #ou feel cat&arsis or Oo#E t&en t&e music is likel# 'osi%e. If #ou listen

to t&e music in anger and feel angr#E t&en t&e music will likel# 'rolong t&ose feelings. Music is also a

great tool for awakening an indi%idual. Posi%e music %i:rates at a certain energ# le%el t&at is &ig&

enoug& to 'osi%el# inuence #our own %i:rator# >eld.

&ere are so man# distracons from t&e outside worldE usuall# in t&e form of mediaE t&at can nega%el#

inuence us and 're%ent us from focusing on our goal. &is is a tec&niRue used :# t&e dark lords to

furt&er kee' t&e masses in :ondage. It is im'ortant to remem:er t&at some t&ings &a%e not #et :een

taintedE and to seek out t&ose w&ic& &a%e t&e a:ilit# to &el' us if we engage in t&em wit& an o'en mind.

&e ke# to minimiing distraconsE as wit& e%er#t&ing elseE is :alance. Wit&out :alanceE t&ings go to

t&eir e=tremiesE w&ic& is unsustaina:le. &ereforeE it is not im'lied t&at #ou must forsake all media if

#ou want to know #our inner2self. We can learn and :e ins'ired from ot&er 'eo'le;s creaonsE :ut if #ou

are constantl# distracng #ourself wit& t&emE t&en e%en t&e 'osi%e content will kee' #ou from

e='anding #our knowledge of self.

)eing 3elfish

o gain a dee'er understanding of selfE it onl# makes 'ro'er sense to :e Gself2is&. Most 'eo'le t&ink of

Gsel>s& wit& a nega%e denotaon and connotaon. Howe%erE sel>s&ness can :e a good Rualit# if

'racced in moderaon. &ere is an agreea:le form of :eing self2is& t&at entails concentrang on t&e

self for self2im'ro%ement. It is im'ossi:le to gain knowledge of self wit&out focusing on self. 3omeone

~ 44 ~



w&o is alwa#s tr#ing to 'lease ot&ers and ne%er focuses on t&emsel%es :ecomes a 'awn in t&e game of

life. &e# will ne%er >nd t&emsel%es or know w&o t&e# trul# are :ecause t&e# ne%er look wit&in. o :e

skillfull# self2is& is a good t&ing for one w&om wants to e%ol%e t&eir consciousness and e='erience self2

master#. 0ne cannot master self wit&out :eing self2is&. 0nl# 'eo'le w&o care solel# a:out t&eir wants

will la:el #ou wit& t&e disagreea:le form of Gsel>s&E :ecause t&e# feel #ou s&ould focus on t&em and

not #ourself. &e# 'roOect t&eir sel>s&ness onto #ou :ecause t&e# cannot understand t&at #ou deser%e

aenon too.

It is not e='ected t&at one engage in self2alienaon in order to increase t&eir knowledge of self. &is

would :e detrimental to #our life. No one wo)man* is an island. Wit& t&at :eing saidE #ou will need to cut

some 'eo'le out of #our life t&at are not ser%ing #ou an#more. Peo'le can :e distracons as well. &e#

gi%e oC t&eir own energ# and %i:raonsE w&ic& &a%e t&e same a:ilit# to aCect #our well:eing as an#

form of media. It;s fairl# argued t&at t&e 'eo'le w&o #ou surround #ourself wit& are actuall# more

'owerful inuences on #our mind t&an and ot&er media. It is im'ortant to c&oose #our com'anions

wisel#E as t&e# can eCect #ou 'osi%el# or nega%el#. It is alwa#s a c&allenge to lea%e certain 'eo'le

:e&ind w&en t&e# &a%e :een in #our life for a w&ileE :ut t&is is a natural 'art of c&ange. If #ou seek t&e

'at& of trut&E c&ange will :e freRuentl# encountered. +&ange is t&e onl# constantE e=ce't in t&e case of

trut&. You must let go of an#t&ing t&at isnJt ser%ing #ou an#more. It ma# sound cold or &ars&E :ut it is a

necessar# realit#. &e lig&tness and 'ure :liss t&at is e='erienced from releasing unnecessar# :urdens is

wort& it. You will t&ank #ourself for releasing 'arasites t&at were sucking #ou dr#.

!on;t :e afraid to :e self2is&.

#ays to 9now &hyself

AQer #ou &a%e let go of e%er#t&ing t&at isnJt ser%ing #ou itJs me to seriousl# di%e wit&in. You can use

tools to &el' #ou understand w&at #ou see wit&in. Mediaon is a great 'racce to di%e wit&in. &ere are

man# sources out t&ere to learn meditaon in t&e linear sense. Howe%erE t&ere is a side to meditaon

t&at #ou can onl# learn from #ourself. &e :asis of meditaon is t&e :reat&. &e :reat& is s'irit and

slowing t&e :reat& downE w&ile :reat&ing dee' wit&in from t&e a:domenE is w&at #ou do '&#sicall# to

'ut #our mind into a medita%e sate. Beleasing all t&e mental c&aer and focusing on t&e :reat& is onl#

one sim'le e='lanaon and 'ers'ec%e of t&e man# out t&ere. Meditaon doesn;t &a%e to :e #ou in a

RuietE secluded 'lace eit&er. Meditaon can &a''en w&en #ou;re 'la#ing s'ortE walkingE cookingE and

e%en talking. Meditaon is mindfulness t&e mindful awareness of eac& 'resent moment.

It can take a w&ile to de%elo' 'ro>cienc# in meditaonE :ut t&ere is no me limit wit& 'racce. In realit#E

#ou ne%er trul# master meditaon :ecause t&e 'rocess of mastering is master#. Man# s'iritualists agree

t&at w&en #ou master #ourselfE #ou &a%e mastered meditaon and t&at #ou must master meditaon in

order to master #ourself. 0nce #ou &a%e mastered #ourselfE #ou;%e mastered #our life. As a:o%e so

:elow as :elow so a:o%e.

4esides meditaonE t&ere are ot&er studies and tools to &el' #ou. Astrolog# and numerolog# are great

sciences t&at can &el' #ou to understand t&e nature and 'ersona t&at #ou take on in t&is life. Astrolog#

deals wit& t&e 'lanetar# :odies and t&eir 'osion or relaon to certain worldl# e%entsE including t&at of

~ 45 ~



#our life. &e most well2known and widel#2used 'iece of astrolog# is t&e &orosco'e and$or natal c&art.

&is 'recious tool uses di%inaon :ased u'on t&e 'lanetar# alignments during t&e me of #our :irt&.

Astrolog# is e=traordinar# signi>cant :ased on t&e 'remise and ma=im GAs a:o%eE so :elow. As :elowE so

a:o%e.

Numerolog# is a di%inaon s#stem t&at discerns relaons&i's using mat&emacs. "%entsE for e=am'leE

can :e traced to num:ers or a numerical origin. &e num:ers can also :e :ased u'on mes and names.

In numerolog#E e%er#t&ing reduces to a num:er. 9or e=am'leE A],. &e end num:er is almost alwa#s

reduced to a single num:er aQer addionE wit& t&e e=ce'on of master num:ersE w&ic& &a%e t&eir own

'ur'ose. &e :asis of numerolog# is reducing data to single num:ers. 9or e=am'le- t&e num:er )777*

would :e added u' to ,E and t&en , would :e summed u' to . &e num:er t&ree &as a certain

meaning in numerolog#E Oust like eac& 'lanetar# :od# &as a 'arcular meaning in astrolog#. "ac& num:er

contains a diCerent %i:raon and t&is is w&at essenall# com'oses of realit#. &ere is not&ing in t&e

uni%erse t&at is wit&out meaning. Not&ing is randomE and t&at is w&# num:ers &a%e so muc&

signi>cance. Num:ers are a decoding mec&anism.

Numerolog# and astrolog# are similar in natureE :ut :ot& &a%e t&eir own 'ur'ose and wa# of deli%ering

t&e message. It is suggested t&at #ou stud# :ot& and c&oose w&ic& one works :est for #ou. You ma# like

:ot& eRuall# and c&oose to use t&em in conOuncon. Numerolog# seems to :e more accurateE :ut

astrolog# seems to :e more detailed.

&roug&out t&e agesE astrolog# and ot&er occult studies suc& as numerolog# &a%e :een demonied and

gi%en a :ad re'utaon. Peo'le dismissed t&ese forms of studies as mere witc&craQ and sorcer# to

'artake in wrongdoings. Numerolog# is mainl# 'racced :# t&e dark lordsE #et t&at doesn;t mean t&ese

studies are e%il. &e fact t&at t&e dark lords 'artake in t&ese di%inaonsE and are in suc& a state of 'owerE

aest to t&e :ene>ts t&at astrolog# and numerolog# oCer. AgainE t&ese are tools. &e dark lords use

t&em to o''ress t&e massesE :ecause we are ignorant of t&ese &ig&l# :ene>cial tools and &ow to use

t&em res'ecta:l#.

&e dark lords 'la# wit& us :# s'reading t&e ideaE using tradional wisdom and mass mediaE t&at t&ese

'racces are satanic or wort&less. We are ignorant and fearful of t&ese 'raccesE w&ic& onl# :ene>ts

t&ose Gin 'ower. &e dark lords are e=tremel# skilled at s'reading misinformaon t&roug& instuons

most 'eo'le res'ect. &e# &a%e in>ltrated all as'ects of societ#E suc& as religious instuonsE t&e

educaon s#stemE t&e medical industr#E and t&e food industr#. Misinformaon is :eing s'read from

e%er# direcon. Not onl# &a%e #ou :een distracted all #our lifeE :ut &a%e also :een lied to :# sources #ou

&a%e trusted and t&oug&t were re'uta:le. If #ou Rueson t&e integrit# of t&ese %alua:le toolsE I would

suggest t&at #ou :egin to stud# t&em an#wa#s to see for #ourself &ow well t&e# can actuall# work.

In trut&E none of t&ese di%inaon s#stems work awlessl# and aren;t guaranteed to make sure #ou know

e=actl# w&o #ou are. 0nl# #ou can know w&o #ou are no e=ternal t&ing is a de>nite or relia:le source for

t&is knowledge. Mindfulness t&roug& meditaon is t&e most relia:le source :ecause it comes from

wit&in. Astrolog# and numerolog# are more like guides. Anot&er great tool is a :ook. A :ook will ne%er

gi%e #ou Gunderstanding of t&e knowledge of GselfE :ut it will &el' awaken t&e knowledge wit&in #ou if

#ou are o'en. You ma# :e a c&est2full of nouris&ing knowledgeE :ut wit&out t&e ke#E #our knowledge is

wort&less. 3omemes a :ook can :e t&e ke# to unlock certain :its of knowledge wit&in #ou t&at would

~ 46 ~



ot&erwise lie dormant in t&e su:conscious wit&out :eing accessed t&roug& meditaon. Please donJt Oust

read t&is :ook. I im'lore and insist #ou read man# :ooks on #our Ruest for t&e trut& and knowledge of

self.

&he -um0er %7

&e num:er , is an e=tremel# signi>cant num:er :ecause of t&e 'ower it wields. Man# are actuall#

familiar wit& t&is num:er and its e%il connotaon. Howe%erE t&is is a num:er of a great &uman 'otenal

t&is is our 'ower. You are t&e ,. We are t&e ,.

, re'resents oneness :# :onding mul'le 'arts toget&er and :eing t&e sum. &e num:er , stands for

deat& and destruconE :ut also resurreconE transformaon and ascension. Kust like t&e >er# '&oeni=

t&at rises out t&e as&esE t&is is #our 'otenal. You must :e tested and e%en knocked down to #our lowest

'oint :efore #ou can stand taller. o :uild a new em'ireE t&e old must >rst :e torn down.

Pertaining to Kudaism and +&risanit#E t&ere were , disci'les and +&rist. +&rist was t&e , t& disci'leE so

toget&er t&e# created t&e ,. Kaco: &ad , sonsE w&om were t&e 'recursors to t&e , tri:es of Israel

Kaco: made t&e ,. Pertaining to wel%eler 3&iJa IslamE t&ere were , legimate successors to t&e

'ro'&et Mu&ammad Mu&ammad made t&e ,.

&e num:er , &as :een a constantl# resurfacing in religionE m#t&olog#E :eliefE measurementsE and so

on. In our current societ#E t&e num:er , is an incessantl# reoccurring num:er. &ere are , &ours on

t&e clockE t&ere are , mont&s in t&e #earE for e=am'le. &e num:er , actuall# signi>es a c#cle and , is

w&at :reaks t&e c#cle. W&ere t&ere is a ,E t&ere is alwa#s a ,. &ereJs a ,t& sign in astrolog#E a ,t&

mont& in a #earE a ,t& moon c#cleE and a ,t& womanJs c#cle. &ere was a ,t& disci'le and t&at was

+&rist. , is em'&asied &ere :ecause it relates to t&e master# of #our life. o master #our mind #ou

must e='ress t&e a:ilit# to &a%e #our old and outdated 'aradigms :roken down and re:uilt.

If #ou li%e :# t&e num:er , and donJt o'en #our mind to see t&e trut& of t&e ,E t&en #ou will alwa#s :e

stuck in t&e c#cle and will ne%er full# grow to t&e ne=t le%el of :eing. , &as re'resented a 'rison of

societ#. &ere are , lines in a cu:e our minds in t&e collec%e consciousness of societ# &a%e :een

closed inside a :o= wit& dogmac :elief s#stems or G4.3. If #ou fear t&e num:er ,E it is a realit# t&at

#ou will :e tra''ed in t&at :o=. , re'resents c&ange and transformaon it &as t&e 'ower to free #ou.

&e num:er , is cle%erl# 'laced into e%er#t&ingE :ut we are distracted :# t&e num:er , :ecause we

'ick u' on t&at 'aern mistakenl#. It is t&is distracon t&at kee's us in t&e c#cle of stagnaon. o :reak

t&is c#cle and :e freeE we must acknowledge t&e c#cle and understand t&at we are t&e manifestaon of

e%oluon- t&e ,.

, is not t&e onl# 'owerful num:erE :ut t&e energ# of t&at num:er will 'ut #ou on track wit& #our life. It

is transformaonal. It is t&e energ# t&at t&is :ook was :orn out of.

~ 47 ~



Chapter : *niversal Laws

o master #our life #ou &a%e to &a%e to master #ourself. &e uni%erse is #ouE and it is mental. @nowing

t&e laws of t&e uni%erse and &ow it o'erates will 'ro%ide a master ke#.

&ese 5ni%ersal Laws aren;t :eliefs or religious dogma t&ese laws are eternal trut&. Man#E if not allE of

t&ese uni%ersal laws can also :e tested and %eri>ed :# t&e scien>c met&od of o:ser%aon.

&he Law of !entalism

&is law states t&at t&ere is an in>nite mind t&at occu'ies and com'oses t&e uni%erse. &at w&ic& #ou

ma# call an omni'resent s'irit or force is not&ing ot&er t&an a magni>cent mind. G&e AllE or t&at w&ic&

man# refer to as G<odE em:odies e%er#t&ing in t&e uni%erse All is mind. &e e=istence of mind is &ea%il#

de:ated :# mainstream scienceE :ut it;s onl# a maer of me :efore t&e# acknowledge it. Mind is onl#

li%ing intelligence. Kust :# looking out into natureE one can o:ser%e t&e :rilliance of t&e li%ing

s'irit$uni%ersal mind.

"%er#t&ing in e=istence is t&e result of a mental construct. &e :lade of grassE t&e coarse sandE t&e e::

and ow of t&e deE t&e 'ure &armon# of nig&t and da#. It is all t&e act of t&e source of intelligence. &e

law of mentalism will alwa#s :e in eCectE :ecause t&e mind cannot sto' :eing. It is im'ossi:le for G&e

All to sto' :eing :# its %er# nature.

&e In>nite li%ing mind &olds immeasura:le 'ower :ecause it consists of all realit#. If mind consists of all

realit# t&en #our t&oug&ts &a%e a:soluteE undenia:le 'ower to aCect #our realit#. 5nderstanding t&at

t&e uni%erse is mind is t&e :eginning of a great awakening. It :ecomes knowledge t&at we are co2

creators wit& t&e source. We can start to create our own realit# :# our %er# own t&oug&ts &e Law of

Mentalism is t&e :asis to knowing &ow to create. @nowing &ow to create is knowing t&e 'ower of t&emind and is 'art of t&e 'rocess of life master#. It is modern da# alc&em#E t&e mental art of

transmutaon.

+urrent Gscience is sll learning and growingE and cannot e='eriment on all t&at e=ists. Wo)men* w&o

t&ink t&e# can know and test all are ca%ing to foll# and arrogance. 0ne cannot e='eriment on w&at t&e#

cannot 'ercei%e. As long as we are &uman :eingsE we will ne%er Gconsciousl# understand t&e uni%erse in

all its m#ster# and com'le=it#. YesE science can 'ro%ide e%idence for man# of t&e laws of t&e uni%erseE

:ut not all t&at t&ere is. &e :est met&od to t&is understanding is to go wit&in oneJs own selfE :ecause

t&at is w&ere t&e connecon to t&e GAll resides. &is connecon does not lie in reduconist e=ternal

e='erimentaon.

&e 'urel# scien>c mind s&ould gladl# acce't most of t&e uni%ersal lawsE :ut as for t&e Law of

MentalismE t&ere ma# not :e acce'tance at >rst contact wit& t&is rut&. Howe%erE if it is not acce'tedE

t&e rest of t&e laws of t&e uni%erse will :e of no use. &e# will work against #ouE instead of for #ou. &e

im'ortance of t&e mind needs to :e gi%e 'ro'er res'ect. Your own mind will decei%e #ou ot&erwiseE

:ased on #our lack of awareness of t&e trut&. &e mind is t&e :asis to inner workings of t&is magni>cent

uni%erse. Wit&out acce'ng t&at t&is creaon is mindE t&ere would :e no reason for an#t&ing. Wit& no

~ 48 ~



reasonE t&ere is no causeE and wit& no causeE t&ere is no eCect. 0ur e=istence is an eCectE so t&ere must

:e a cause and a reason. Wit&out t&is understandingE #ou will :e %icm to t&e Grandom occurrences of

t&e uni%erse. You will :e lost if Greason cannot trul# :e acce'ted.

It is not to :e asked t&at #ou :lindl# acce't reason wit&out Rueson. You must Rueson e%er#t&ing

encountered on t&e 'at& of knowledge and trut& e%en t&is %er# :ook. Howe%erE it;s said in con>dence

t&at if #our Ruesoning is logicalE t&en it will result in acce'ng reason. 3ound logic and reasoning is

'ro%ided in good &o'es t&at #ou will see. If reason did not e=istE t&en not&ing would &a%e meaning.Wit&out reasonE man# t&ings could not e=ist or :e taken seriousl#. &e %er# reason t&at Greason is

necessar# to learn s&ould 'ro%ide e%idence for reasonJs e=istence. Beason is intelligent design. Beason is

mind mind is G&e All. &e uni%erse is t&e creaon of G&e All. &e uni%erse is mental. Here:# t&e Law

of Mentalism.

&he Law of Correspondence

&e Hermec ma=im t&at &as :een re'eatedl# stated in t&is :ookE Gas a:o%e so :elowE as :elow so

a:o%eE is t&e Law of +orres'ondence e='lained sim'liscall#. "ssenall# t&is law illustrates t&at w&at

&a''ens on one 'lane$densit# of realit# is also &a''ening on anot&er. It ma# :e of a diCerent

'ers'ec%eE :ut t&ese &a''enings do corres'ond to eac& ot&er. As a:o%eE w&ic& is Gt&e &ea%ensE so

:elowE w&ic& is eart& or a singular 'erson. &e re%erse is also trueE Gas :elowE so a:o%e. &is is not to

sa# one side causes t&e ot&er. &ere is no se'arate realit# for t&e two sides of a 'encil. It is one uni>ed

w&oleE Oust like w&en a 'encil is 'icked u' &oriontall# and :ot& ends rise. &e eraser did not cause t&e

wring end to riseE and t&e wring end did not cause t&e eraser to rise- t&e# are :ot& a 'art of t&e same

'encil.

&e stud# and science of astrolog#E for e=am'leE :ases its enre conclusions oC of corres'ondence. In

s'aceE or Gt&e &ea%ensE 'lanetar# :odies e='ress certain relaons&i's. 0n eart&E t&ese 'lanetar#

alignments or relaons&i's are used to discern certain e%ents and 'redicted outcomes. &e 'lanetar#alignments do not cause certain e%entsE t&e# onl# corres'ond wit& t&em and suc& is t&e same for

certain e%ents not causing certain 'lanetar# alignments. ItJs all corres'ondence. 3ome ma# call t&is Gt&e

Law of Parado=E and rig&Tull# so. 3ince we are indi%iduals w&o e='erience certain e%ents on eart& from

t&is 'ers'ec%eE it ma# look like t&e 'lanets are causing our fateE :ut t&is is not true. Astrolog# s&ould :e

&onored for w&at it is and used as a ma' to gi%e us direcons on our 'at&. 9ate does not dictate desn#.

We G&a%e created our fate and Gare creang our desn#.

&e Law of +orres'ondence also re%eals itself in sacred geometr#E suc& as in t&e 9i:onacci seRuence and

t&e golden meanE w&ic& manifests itself in>nitel# in nature. &is Law is one of :est laws to connect t&e

dots leading to a more e='anding realit# t&an w&at we &a%e :een misled to :elie%e e=ists.

&he Law of ;i0ration

&e Law of %i:raon states t&at e%er#t&ing in e=istence is ne%er at rest. It is all mo%ing or %i:rang at a

certain s'eed. &is law is easil# acknowledged t&roug& modern science. I discussed 're%iousl# t&at most

of us learned a:out diCerent states of maer in grade sc&ool. &e most gross$dense states of maer

%i:rate t&e slowestE and t&e less dense t&e# getE t&e &ig&er t&e %i:raon. "%er#t&ing &as a certain

~ 49 ~



molecular %i:raon e%en t&ings t&at look as if t&e# are not mo%ingE suc& as a :lock of wood.

&e molecules of t&e wood :lockE w&ic& look staonar#E are actuall# mo%ing. &is %i:raon can also :e

called a wa%elengt&. All forms of maer create a wa%elengt& 'redicated u'on t&e s'eed t&eir 'arcles

are mo%ing. Hence w&# t&e law of %i:raon goes e%en furt&er into t&ings t&at arenJt usuall# t&oug&t of

or classi>ed as a form of maer or energ#E suc& as t&oug&tsE emoonsE and states of mind. &ese are all

t&ings t&at &a%e a certain %i:raon$wa%elengt& associated wit& t&em. "%er#t&ing is in a state of

mo%ement and &as a 'arcular wa%elengt&. &ings onl# %ar# in degreeE Oust like &ot and cold are :ot&tem'erature :ut are onl# Oudgments of degree.

Pertaining to moodE w&ic& is t&e sim'lest e=am'leE t&ere are low %i:raonal moods and &ig& %i:raonal

moods. Low %i:raon is usuall# associated wit& nega%e emoonsE suc& as- fearE angerE &ateE Oealous#E

sadness and &ig& %i:raons are usuall# associated wit& 'osi%e emoonsE suc& as- courageE acce'tanceE

lo%eE Oo#E and &a''iness. All %i:raon$freRuenc# originates from t&e mindE suc& as a t&oug&tE w&ic& is

translated into an emoon and can :e felt in t&e '&#siolog#E if t&e t&oug&t is maintained. We also call

emoonE e2moonE or energ# in moon.

i:raon ne%er ceases t&ere is not&ing t&at is Gsll in t&e uni%erse. &ings t&at seem sll are eit&ermo%ing at suc& a low %i:raon t&at it seems to :e a solidE or suc& a &ig& %i:raon t&at it seems to &old a

certain 'lace. If #ou &a%e a 'owerful fan and :egin to turn u' t&e s'eedE #ou will see aQer it reac&es a

certain s'eedE t&at t&e fan will :egin to look as if it is not mo%ing at all. &is is t&e same wit& sound. If

#ou were to control t&e 'itc& of a certain soundE and turn it u' to t&e &ig&est freRuenc#E t&en #ou would

:egin to &ear a %er# &ig& 'itc& sound. @ee' on turning u' t&e dial and #ou would :egin to &ear t&e

sound no more. W&at is &a''ening is t&at t&e freRuenc# of t&e sound wa%e &as risen so &ig& t&at t&e

&uman ear cannot detect itE like a dog w&istle.

&ere are man# t&ings t&at t&e &uman :eing cannot detect 'ertaining to t&e >%e senses. &is is due to a

range limitaon of our sensor# organs. &is is w&# a dog can &ear a &ig& 'itc& w&istleE :ut a &umancannot. &e dogJs ears can sense t&e &ig&er %i:raon generated :# t&e w&istle. "%en looking at t&e

%isi:le lig&t s'ectrumE t&e range for &uman %isi:ilit# is %er# limited. 9or e=am'le- we cannot see radio

wa%esE microwa%esE infrared wa%esE ultra%iolet wa%esE =2ra#JsE or gamma2 ra#Js. &ese freRuencies are all

outside t&e gras' of t&e &uman e#e.

All realit# 'resents itself as %i:raonE freRuenc#E wa%elengt&E energ#E lig&tE or sound t&ese are all

essenall# t&e same t&ing. &e Mantra and 3anskrit sound G0mE deri%ed from t&e Hindu languageE is

said to :e t&e %i:raon of t&e 3u'reme 4eing and t&e sound of <od according to Hindu te=ts. &e Hindus

and ot&ers understood t&is conce't of %i:raon. G0m is said to encom'ass all %i:raon$tones in t&at

single mantra. &ereforeE t&e %i:raon of G&e All is felt and &eard w&ile 'roducing t&e mantra. &is'&iloso'&# &as also s'read to man# ot&er sc&ools of t&oug&t t&at All is sound or %i:raonE w&ic& is w&#

religion isn;t de%oid of trut&s. &ere is trut& in man# sc&ools of t&oug&t.

If #ouJ%e e%er &eard of G&e Law of AraconE it originated from G&e Law of i:raon. Aracon is

'ure %i:raon and %i:raon is a form of aracon. &e 'remise for t&e Law of Aracon is t&at like

aracts like. It doesn;t work like magnetsE as like re'els like 'olaries &ere. It works like a radio dial #ou

tune in to t&e freRuenc# #ou wis& to &ear. &e uni%erse works like a com'uter simulaonE e=ce't it;s all

~ 50 ~



mental. If we ta' into to t&e rig&t freRuenc# t&en we;ll :e a:le to e='erience t&e realit# of w&at t&at

freRuenc# emulates in t&e uni%erse. If #ou emulate t&e lo%e freRuenc# t&en #ou;ll aract lo%e. If #ou

emulate t&e %i:raon of &ate t&en #ou aract more &ate into #our life. If #ou e=&i:it a 'osi%e %i:raon

t&en #ou will aract 'osi%e t&ings into #our lifeE and if #ou e=&i:it a nega%e %i:raon #ou will aract

nega%it# into #our life. &is law of i:raon$aracon is t&e star 'la#er of creang #our realit#E w&ic&

we will del%e into more so ne=t c&a'ter. It sounds kind of Gnew age#E :ut t&is is one true t&ing t&at is

'ro'agated :# t&e new age Gmo%ement. &e 'ro:lem wit& t&e new age Gmo%ement is t&at t&e# tease

#ou wit& aaining mainl# su'er>cial or material t&ings. &e dece'on in t&e new age Gmo%ement ist&at #ou can get an#t&ing #ou want Oust :# t&inking a:out it for long enoug&. &e# usuall# lea%e out t&e

acon com'onent or t&e realit# t&at one must 'ut in t&e work necessar# to ac&ie%e w&at t&e# want.

Mastering #our life is mastering #our mind and to master #our mindE #ou need to know of t&e eCect of

t&e Law of i:raon. 9or mind is %i:raon and mind is realit#. 0nce #ou &a%e more control o%er #our

mental state #ou;ll &a%e more control o%er #our %i:raonE and t&erefore will :eer &a%e #our realit# in

&armon# wit& #our own t&oug&ts. &e Law of i:raon is so sim'liscE #et its eCects are astonis&ing.

&he Law of Polarity

&e Law of Polarit#E also known as G&e Law of !ualit#E addresses t&at t&ere are alwa#s two sides to

e%er#t&ing. W&en we s'eak of 'olarit#E it is generall# acce'ted as nega%e and 'osi%e. Polarit# is not

admiZng two diCerent su:OectsE :ut two diCerent natures. &e 'encil e=am'le t&at was :roug&t u' in

t&e GLaw of +orres'ondence can also work for t&e law of 'olarit#. &ere is a nega%e end and a 'osi%e

end to t&e 'encil :ut :ot& sides are sll t&e 'encil. Heat &as a 'osi%e 'olarit# and cold &as a nega%e

'olarit#E #et t&e# are :ot& tem'erature. Posi%e and nega%e are onl# classi>ed in a maer of

degree$'ers'ec%e.

&is descri'on is not to sa# dualit# doesnJt e=ist. It does and it doesnJt- t&e law of 'arado= or

corres'ondence. 9or dualit# is %er# real &ere in t&e material 'lane if it didn;t e=ist t&en we couldn;t

e='erience contrast. "%er#t&ing would :e t&e same wit& no %ar#ing degrees. We wouldn;t know w&at

&a''iness was :ecause t&ere would :e no contrast to it wit&out sadness. We wouldn;t know w&at cold

or &ot was :ecause e%er#t&ing would all :e t&e same tem'erature.

We do see dualit# and 'olarit# e='ressed in e%er#t&ing t&at e=ists &ere in t&is densit# of e=istence. YetE

we sll know t&at t&ere is a &ig&er 'lane and t&at e%er#t&ing originates from one ent#. "%er#t&ing in

e=istence came from sourceE and it is wit& t&is source t&at dualit# does not e=ist. &ere is no contrast

&ere :ecause t&e source is all t&at t&ere is.

&e state of lo%e is classi>ed :# t&e 'osi%e 'olarit# and t&e state of fear is classi>ed :# t&e nega%e

'olarit#. It seems t&at t&ese intense feelings can c&ange almost instantl# and t&en :ack againE :ecause

t&e# are %er# similar #et o''osites. It &as :een t&e ad%ice of t&e wise to go in t&e direcon of #our fears.

&is is w&ere we trul# e='erience enlig&tenmentE e%oluonE and lo%e.

Mental alc&em# :ases its success oC of understanding t&e law of 'olarit#. A mental alc&emist uses t&e

~ 51 ~



art of transmutaon to c&ange &is or &er mental state from one 'olarit# to t&e ne=t. &is is &ow #ou can

go from sad to &a''#E fear to lo%eE and anger to 'assion. &e most 'o'ular descri'on of alc&em# is

transforming t&e :ase metal lead into gold. Howe%erE alc&em# was >rst and foremost a mental art :efore

it :ecame materialied. If mental as'ect canJt :e masteredE t&e material ne%er will. Master t&e mind and

an#t&ing is 'ossi:le. 4udd&ist monks &a%e s&own us t&is is 'ossi:le :# walking on >er# &ot coals wit&

not a sign of 'ain and$or inOur# and undergoing surger# wit&out anest&esia. &is is &ow a &omeless man

li%ing on t&e :ier cold streets can sll :e &a''ier t&an t&ose w&o &a%e e%er# material item t&e# desire.

&is is &ow a man deserted on an island can sll >nd &o'e w&en t&ose w&o &a%e comforta:le li%es lose&o'e in t&emsel%es. &e mind is #our most 'owerful tool.

&he Law of <hythm

&ere is a ceaseless r&#t&m to t&e uni%erse. &e sun rises and setsE t&ere is 'eace and %iolenceE t&ere is

life and deat&. &e r&#t&m is :est c&aracteried :# a swinging 'endulum. &e 'endulum swings :ack and

fort&E as far :ack as it &as fort& and %ice %ersa. &e 'endulum cannot swing fort& wit&out returning :ack

t&is would go against t&e laws of '&#sicsE as well as uni%ersal law. NewtonJs Laws of moon states t&at

for e%er# acon t&ere is an eRual and o''osite reacon.

Kust as a material 'endulum swings :ack and fort&E acted u'on :# t&e laws of '&#sicsE mental and

emoonal states swing :ack and fort&E dictated :# t&e law of r&#t&m. 5ni%ersal Law indeed e='resses

itself in t&e science of manE and t&is is w&# t&e# can work in conOuncon wit& one anot&erE w&en

'ercei%ed 'ro'erl#.

3omeoneE w&om is %er# c&aocall# emoonal isn;t uliing t&e art of mental transmutaon. 0ne is

&a''# one minute and sad t&e ne=tE :ut &as t&e a:ilit# to o%ercome t&is :ackward swing :#

tuning$'olariing t&emsel%es to t&e 'osi%e 'ole. &e :ackward swing will sll occurE :ut will not :e

e='eriences consciousl# :ecause t&e mind is on a diCerent 'lane altoget&er t&e mind is a:o%e t&e 'lane

on w&ic& t&e 'endulum swings. &e a:ilit# to do t&is is 'aramount to mastering #our mind and #our life.

All it reall# means is to realie #ou are not #our emoonsE t&oug&ts or feelingsE :ut it does take

mindfulness and a focus to do t&is. Working on one;s inner2game is ke# to mastering t&e mind. If #ou let

#our emoons rule #ou t&en #ou will :e a mere tum:leweed geZng t&rown around :# t&e wind wit&out

a 'ur'oseful direconE in a constant state of uncertaint# and c&aos. "moon is a 'owerful tool

'ertaining to t&e creaon of #our realit#. If #ou cannot control &ow #ou react to w&at #ou feelE t&en #ou

will alwa#s :e a sla%e to #our feelings. You will not &a%e an# control o%er #our realit#E :ecause #ou will

not :e a:le to consciousl# create or manifest #our desires.

&he Law of Cause and Effect

G&e All is GAll Law. 3ince G&e All is LawE e%er#t&ing in e=istence must :e 'redicated u'on Law. Law is

orderE and t&ere must alwa#s :e reason$cause for order to e=ist. Wit&out orderE t&ere is c&aos. Beason is

causeE and cause :rings a:out eCect. &e uni%erse is %er# muc& an orderl# uni%erse :ased u'on t&e GLaw

of +ause and "Cect. +ause and eCect are in&erentl# Law in acon. A man slee's wit& countless

~ 52 ~



'rostutes and gets an 3!. &ere is a causeE Gt&e man slee'ing wit& man# 'rostutesE and t&ere is an

eCectE Gt&e man contracng an 3!. If t&is wasn;t an orderl# uni%erse :ased on t&e law of cause and

eCect t&en %irgins could randoml# contract 3!s or ma#:e trees would :egin to contract &uman

diseases. &ankfull# t&e uni%erse doesn;t o'erate in t&is c&aoc manner.

&is is a uni%erse :ased u'on order. "%er# acon #ields a reacon. If a man eats >%e &am:urgers eac&

and e%er# da#E t&e eCect would :e t&at t&is man would gain 'rofound weig&t. If cause and eCect wasn;t

a uni%ersal law t&en ma#:e eang >%e &am:urgers a da# could :ecome an a'&rodisiacE and &el' #ou tolose weig&tE or 'er&a's make #our tongue turn 'ur'le. It is undenia:le t&at t&ese circumstances sound

outrageous and sill#E :ut t&ese are t&e 'ossi:ilies of a c&aoc uni%erse not :ased u'on t&e 'rinci'les of

reason and G&e Law of +ause and "Cect. &e scien>c met&od couldn;t e%en work in a world wit&out

cause and eCect. &is ma# %er# well :e a cold and calculang lawE :ut t&is is w&# t&e uni%erse is not a

res'ecter of 'ersonsE and w&# t&is :ook doesn;t 'ro'agate religious doctrine.

&ere is a reason for e%er#t&ing t&at &as &a''enedE is &a''eningE and will &a''en. &e most c&allenging

t&ing is to admit t&at trut& to oursel%es. We oQen ask oursel%es w&# certain t&ings are &a''ening to usE

and G&ow do I deser%e t&is( GIf t&ere is a godE w&# is &e leZng t&is &a''en to us( &e most im'ortant

t&ing to acknowledge is t&at e%er#t&ing is &a''ening to us for a reason. An e%il act in and of itself isne%er going to :e rig&tE :ut we do grow from unOust e='eriences. A kid t&at &as :een :ullied in &is

c&ild&ood can :ene>t from t&is e='erience :# seeing it as an o''ortunit#. W&en t&at kid :ecomes an

adult &e ma# mentor kids and gi%e s'eec&es at elementar# sc&ools to &el' ot&ers stand u' for

t&emsel%es. 4eaut# can come out of darkness. We are gods of oursel%es. We create &ea%en and &ell for

oursel%es. We create t&e cause and e='erience t&e eCect. Wit& t&is comes em'owerment and

somemesE lack of acce'tance. 4eing t&e master of #our life takes massi%e res'onsi:ilit#. We don;t need

to look at oursel%es as %icms an#more. We are %ictors if we c&oose to :e. &e :ullied kid could c&oose

to remain t&e %icm and :ull# ot&er 'eo'leE or t&e more rewarding c&oice of &el'ing alle%iate t&e

suCering of ot&ers.

&he Law of 2ender

&e masculine and feminine as'ects manifest t&emsel%es in all t&at is. 0f course t&e most o:%ious

manifestaon is se=E in t&e form of a male and female. Howe%erE gender also manifests itself in ions and

molecules 'ertaining to t&e electrical c&arge. Posi%e and nega%e energ# correlates to t&e masculine

and feminine 'rinci'les. &e male energ# is referred to as 'osi%e and female would :e considered

nega%e. HereE 'osi%e and nega%e do not refer to good and :adE :ut eRual and o''osing forces t&at

intertwine toget&er as a uni>ed w&ole to create :alance. Wit& no 'rotons or molecules wit& a 'osi%e

c&argeE an atom could not e=ist to ser%e its 'ur'ose. Wit& no electrons an atom could not e=ist and

ser%e its 'ur'ose. No energ# is dominant o%er t&e ot&er :ot& &a%e t&eir se'arate Rualies t&at work

:est w&en t&e# coe=ist. &ere are man# similaries :etween t&is law and Gt&e Law of Polarit#. Howe%erE

t&e# also &a%e t&eir own se'arate meaning. &e Law of <ender can :uild u'on G&e Law of Polarit#E :ut

wit&out 'olarit# gender cannot e=ist. <ender addresses itself 'redicated u'on t&e Gnature of t&e

energ#. &e law of 'olarit# addresses dualit#.

~ 53 ~



In t&e #in and #ang +&inese '&iloso'&#E #in is c&aracteried :# t&e masculine energ#E re'resenng suc&

states as nig&tE coldE leQE and water. &e #angE or masculine energ#E re'resents da#E warmt&E rig&tE and

>re. Howe%erE suc& states are not a:solute to one &uman gender. A male ma# include #in and t&e female

ma# e=&i:it #ang. W&at are a:solute are t&e states of consciousness. Masculine energ# is 'ure will and

:eingE w&ile feminine energ# is 'ure imaginaon and creaon. &e conscious state of mind is

re'resented :# t&e male genderE and t&e su:conscious is re'resented :# t&e female gender. +ollec%e

consciousness generall# %iews women as :eing more dee'E darkE and m#steriousE and t&is is t&e nature

of t&e feminine energ#. +on%ersel#E t&e man is generall# looked at as trans'arentE :luntE and o%erl#logical and t&e same remains true for t&e masculine energ#.

Here are some corres'onding states of mind- logic %ersus imaginaon conscious %ersus su:conscious

com'utaon %ersus creaon. +rea%it# is generall# looked at as a feminine Rualit#E and it isE :ut t&is is

not to sa# a male canJt create. It would :e ignorant to sa# so. 4ot& man and woman can 'ossess :ot&

masculine and feminine Rualies$states of mind. &e Law of +orres'ondence &as its 'lace &ereE

'ertaining to contrast in gender Rualies of G&e All and t&e uni%erse. G&e All re'resents willE

masculinit#E and t&e fat&er. It is t&e will of G&e All$&e 3ource t&at :egan t&e uni%erse t&e uni%erse

re'resenng creaonE t&e feminine 'rinci'le and t&e mot&er. &ese conce'ts seem to :e common

knowledge Oudging :# our language usage. We oQen refer to nature as Gmot&er natureE and t&esu'reme creator as Gt&e fat&erE at least in religion. G&e All is :ot& t&e creator and t&e creaonE

'ossessing :ot& masculine and feminine. &is is w&at :eing w&ole is. If we are to master oursel%es we

need to :ecome w&ole :eingsE and in t&at we need to 'ossess a :alance of masculine and feminine

energ#.

Wit&out willE we can onl# create for anot&er and cannot create our own creaon. 0ur crea%e mind is

alwa#s creangE :ut wit&out our own willE we are ruled :# t&e will of anot&er as &as :een descri:ed in

t&e e=&ortaon u'on t&e Gdark lords. We :ecome ruled w&en we are not at :alance wit& our masculine

and feminine energies. An o%ercom'ensated im:alance 'ertaining to t&e masculine energ# is using

Gwill to mani'ulate. &e 'arado= is t&at w&en we mani'ulate ot&ersE someone else is alwa#smani'ulang us. An o%ercom'ensated im:alance 'ertaining to t&e feminine is w&en we &a%e a lack of

will and t&erefore :ecome t&e sla%es of t&ose w&o w&o use t&eir will to mani'ulate. &e ke# is to :e in

:alanceE w&ic& means to not to mani'ulate ot&ers and not :e mani'ulated. &e will is t&e energ# t&at is

used to Oum'2start t&e creaon 'rocessE :ut we must :e a:le to 'roduce a creaonE or else t&e will is

useless. Kust like t&e 'ollen$s'erm is t&e energ# used to germinate t&e seed to create a 'lant. 4ot&

masculine and feminine energies are meant to work toget&er wit&in t&e realms of :alance and &armon#.

&he Law of 2eneration

&e Law of generaonE ot&erwise known as t&e GLost 'rinci'le or G<enera%e 'rinci'leE is t&at w&ic&

generates growt& and$or c&ange. It is an essenal ingredient to work in &armon# wit& an# of t&e

uni%ersal laws. &e uni%ersal laws re'resent t&e seed of lifeE w&ic& is a s#m:ol of 7 circles enca'sulated

:# an t& circle. &is outer circle re'resents t&e outer co%ering of a seed t&at gi%es it t&e a:ilit# to create

life. &e genera%e 'rinci'le is GcareE w&ic& is diCerenated from lo%e :ecause one can care a:out a

~ 54 ~



t&ing and not e='ress lo%eE :ut fear or &ate. &e dark lords surel# Gcare a:out t&eir agendaE and

t&erefore are a:le to work wit& t&is uni%ersal law for t&eir 's#c&o'at&ic agenda. Wit&out careE no one

will accom'lis& w&at t&e# en%ision. +are is t&e causal factor t&at goes into eCect and generates t&e

c&ange t&at we sa# we want. Wit&out careE t&ere is no creaon of an# %ision and$or realit#.

&he =th *niversal Law

If t&ere is a ?t& uni%ersal lawE I &a%en;t came across an# e=ternal informaon on w&at e=actl# it is. &e

t& lawE Gt&e Lost Princi'leE was alread# somew&at :uried into t&e occultE gi%ing rise to t&e name.

Howe%erE t&ere ma# %er# well :e a ?t& 'rinci'leE &eld in far more secrec# :# t&e dark lordsE onl#

re%ealing itself linearl# w&en one &as ad%anced t&roug& certain le%els of t&e m#ster# sc&ools. Beasoning

logicall#E since t&ere are eig&t lawsE t&en t&ere must surel# :e a nint&. It;s intui%el# suggested t&at t&is

nint& 'rinci'le is somet&ing t&at must :e t&e &ig&est law re'resenng order in t&e uni%erse. &at

'rinci'le would &a%e lo%e and$or trut&. 9or sake of sim'licit#E it will :e called Glo%e &ere. Lo%e

re'resents orderE and fear re'resents c&aos. &e uni%erse is one t&at deals in :alance and orderE and

Glo%e can :e t&e onl# 'rinci'le to re'resent t&at. Howe%erE t&e law mustnJt :e acce'ted to createc&ange onl# Gcare is necessar# for t&at. Ne%ert&elessE t&e 'rinci'le of lo%e must :e esta:lis&ed to

create c&ange t&at is rooted in :alanceE orderE &armon#E and :ene%olence. An#t&ing outside of t&at is

c&aoc and leads to suCering. No one must need to ad%ance into t&e m#ster# sc&ools to aain t&is trut&.

Lo%e is somet&ing in&erent to all s'iritsE and can onl# :e acce'ted.

~ 55 ~



Chapter >: Create 8our <eality

&is :ook &as :een wrien in a certain order for good reason. o consciousl# createE #ou need to know-

w&at t&e trut& isE &a%e a good understanding on &ow t&e uni%erse and life came to :e GoriginsE know

w&o #ou areE and understand t&e uni%ersal laws. All t&is reall# translates into Oust knowing w&o #ou areE

:ut it;s se'arated &ere for t&e >nite mind to :eer see t&e o:Oec%it# of t&is knowledge.

Ne=t on t&e menu is somet&ing t&at &as :een taug&t :# man# ci%iliaon as t&e met&od for t&eir trut&

disco%er# met&odolog#E :ut it;s more so on 'ar wit& understanding &ow to directl# create #our realit#

w&ic& is w&# it;s in t&is c&a'ter. Ironicall#E understanding trut& is a :ig 'art of :eing a:le to create t&e

realit# t&at #ou want for #ourself. 4u#ing into lies and dece'on will &a%e #ou create an illusor# realit#

t&at won;t ser%e #ou or #our goals.

&he &rivium

&e tri%ium is a t&ree ste' orderl# 'rocess t&at determines and e='lains &ow our realit# is created and

w&at manifested creaon will result in. It;s an ancient met&odolog# t&at &as :een taug&t in t&e m#ster#

sc&ools and to t&ose in 'owerE :ut &as :een ke't &idden from t&e 'u:lic e#e for a de>nite 'ur'ose. If

'eo'le knew t&is met&odolog# t&en t&e#;d :e a:le to consciousl# create t&e realit# t&e# want and not

:e sla%e to t&e will of t&e dark lords.

&e 'rocess of t&e tri%ium starts wit& knowledgeE or lack t&ereofE and t&e a%aila:le informaon t&at

constutes as 'otenal knowledge. &is a%aila:le informaon can onl# :ecome knowledge if taken in

and 'rocessed 'ro'erl#. &is stage of t&e tri%ium can also :e referred to as t&e grammar stageE or in'ut

stage.

&e second stage of t&e tri%ium is understandingE or lack t&ereof. 5nderstanding needs to :e 'resent for

decision2making 'rocesses to :e in &armon# wit& t&e wanted realit#. @nowledge results in

understanding. &e correctness of our decision2making 'rocess directl# results from our t&e degree of

our understanding. &ese decision2making 'rocesses take 'lace in t&e mindE and are c&osen :# eac&

indi%idual 'redicated u'on a%aila:le informaon. &is stage can also :e referred to as t&e logic stageE or

'rocessing stage.

&e t&ird stage of t&e tri%ium is wisdomE or lack t&ereof. Wisdom is t&e result of t&e )acons* t&at we

take :ased u'on our understandingE w&ic& is rooted in our knowledge. &e >nal ste' of t&e tri%ium

'rocess is acon. Acon in t&e form of &uman :e&a%ior w&at we do wit& w&at we know and

understand. Fualit# of :e&a%ior is :ased u'on t&e Rualit# of t&e decision2making 'rocessesE w&ic& is

:ased on t&e Rualit# of a%aila:le informaon. &is stage can also :e referred to as t&e r&etoric stageE or

out'ut stage.

&e result of t&e tri%ium is t&e manifested$generated realit#E w&ic& can eit&er :e orderl# or c&aoc. In

~ 56 ~



t&e com'uter wordE t&e result of t&e tri%ium is w&at #ou would see on t&e screen. &e com'uter analog#

is a great one to understand &ow t&is tri%ium works in t&e real worldE :ecause a com'uter is modeled

aQer t&e &uman :rainE and t&e uni%erse and our li%es resem:le t&at of an organic com'uter simulaon.

@nowledge is t&e in'ut t&at needs to :e assimilated. 5nderstanding is 'rocessing and anal#ing t&is

informaon. Wisdom is t&e out'ut. &e result is w&at is seen on t&e screenE t&e Gdis'la#E or w&at is

seen in #our life. W&at #ou create also eCects t&e aggregate on a glo:al scale. 3o we can in fact c&ange

t&e world :# c&anging oursel%es. "ac& indi%idual;s &uman :e&a%iorE in a societ#E takes 'art in manifesng

t&e collec%e e='erience in said societ#. &is makes it all t&e more im'ortant to go t&roug& t&e stages'ro'erl# so order is 'roduced o%er c&aos.

&e tri%ium is a :asic #et great e='lanaon of &ow our realit# is created. Howe%erE it cannot :e

em'&asied enoug& &ow im'ortant our t&oug&ts are in creang t&e realit# we want. &e e='lanaon of

&ow our t&oug&ts create realit# deser%es muc& more detail.

&houghts are &hings

As we knowE realit# was$is created from mind and is mental. Mind 'recedes materialE so our realit# is

constructed and diCerenated :ased u'on diCerent freRuencies$wa%elengt&s$%i:raons. &ese

interc&angea:le terms descri:e in&erentl# w&at a t&oug&t is at it;s core. &oug&ts are t&ings in our

uni%erse &a%ing t&e a:ilit# to master #our t&oug&ts is one of t&e master ke#s to consciousl# creang

#our own realit# and also &el'ing to c&ange t&e collec%e realit# t&at we all e='eriences as a s'ecies.

&e Rueson t&en :ecomesE G&ow does one master t&eir t&oug&ts( We all &a%e numerous nega%e

t&oug&ts entering our mind eac& and e%er# da#. It is fair to t&ink it ma# seem im'ossi:le to master #our

t&oug&ts. 3ome in t&e scien>c communit# claim t&at we &a%e no control o%er our t&oug&ts. Howe%erE

t&e# do not see t&e :igger 'icture and don;t acknowledge t&at we are Oust more t&an com'le=mac&iner#. We wouldn;t &a%e control o%er our t&oug&t if we were Oust 'rogrammed ro:otsE :ut our

in&erent true intangi:le and im'ermanent self &as t&e freedom to make decisions and t&e freedom to

c&oose. Peo'le can c&oose to t&ink 'osi%el# or not. It is not im'lied t&at it;s eas# or e%en 'ossi:le to

:lock out Gall nega%e t&oug&tsE :ut t&ere is no rule t&at t&ese nega%e t&oug&ts must in>ltrate and

take o%er our conscious e='erience. We can :e aware of t&em and t&en discard of t&em at will.

-egative !ental Programing

3ince

we &a%e :een :roug&t into t&is worldE our minds &a%e :een :om:arded wit& nega%it# and t&edark lords &a%e 'la#ed a :ig role in t&is. &e# know t&at c&ildren are t&e future. &ese disagreea:le

:eings are e=tremel# knowledgea:leE and t&e# do know t&at c&ildren are easil# inuenced and molded

:# t&e will of anot&er. &ereforeE c&ildren are :om:arded :# media Oust like t&e adults are. Most

e%er#one &as &eard of t&e Holl#wood and music industr# cons'irac#- t&at all w&o run it and are

associated wit& t&em are satanic and e%il in nature. &is :elief is not&ing more t&an a distraconE :ut

t&ere is trut& in it. 3atanismE w&et&er :ased in illusion or notE is 'racced :# some. And t&e w&ole

~ 57 ~



satanic media cons'irac# is entertained mainl# :# t&e religious crowdE and t&e ones w&om are sll

'rogrammed :# religion. Howe%erE e%er#t&ing 'ertaining to media is not e%il or t&e de%il. Media is :ut

anot&er tool to get a message across. &e tool can :e used to s'read a message of knowledgeE trut& and

&armon#E or a message of distraconE ignoranceE and destrucon.

All of our nega%e mental 'rogramming comes from a message of ignorance and$or destrucon. &e

Mc!onaldJs ad s&ows t&e mind t&at t&is a:ominaon referred to as GfoodEis going to :ring us

'leasureE Oo#E and &a''iness. &e ad correlates t&e 'oison wit& images of to#s and smiling c&aractersE

w&ic& gets 'lanted into t&e su:conscious mind of t&e c&ild. Media also incessantl# 'ro%ides c&ildren

wit& images of inferiorit# 'ertaining to all as'ects of life. 9or e=am'leE media will 'romote t&e message-

You are not as Gcool as anot&er kid if #ou donJt own t&e latest electric Oee'E as&# :ic#cleE %ideo2gameE

and now2a2da#sE cell '&one #ouJre not 're# if #ou don;t look like a 4ar:ie doll #ouJre not going to win

if #ou donJt &a%e t&e :iggest water gun. &ese messages are ones of &ea%# materialisc consumerism

greed. AndE e%en worseE t&is message 'ortra#s t&at t&e Rualit# of a c&ildJs life will not :e t&e :est

wit&out &a%ing t&ese 'roducts or looking like t&ese >gures.

Nega%e mental 'rogramming does not alwa#s come from media. It can also originate from ot&er

&uman :eingsE 'arcularl# t&e ones closest to #ou. &ere will alwa#s :e a 'erson in #our life t&at &as

:een :rokenE and will aem't s'read t&eir :roken world into #our own mind. &ese 'eo'le are :asicall#

'arasitesE and will s'read t&eir nega%e energec >eld unto t&ose w&om let t&em in. As a c&ildE almost

e%er#one can relate to t&at auntE uncleE or anot&er famil# mem:er w&o was a G!e::ie !owner. &is is

an indi%idual w&o &as :een consumed wit& nega%it# and does not&ing else :ut s'read it to ot&ers. It

does not make t&e indi%idual a :ad 'ersonE :ut it is destruc%e to ot&ersE es'eciall# c&ildren. A #oung

mind is es'eciall# susce':le to t&isE :ecause t&e nega%it# turns into an uncontrolla:le 'rogram aQer

its ince'on in t&e #oung mind. It riddles t&e mind like a %irus unl t&e c&ild :elie%es t&at t&is nega%e

t&oug&t is true and a''lies to t&eir %er# own life. &e #oung mind is gulli:le and easil# 'rogramma:le.

&is is not to sa# t&at c&ildren are stu'id. &e# sim'l# take informaon more easil# and less cricall#E

and oQen mimic it instead of drawing out t&e useful :its.

&is Gde::#2downer famil# mem:er tells t&e c&ild t&at t&e# cannotE or s&ould not do certain t&ings

'ertaining to t&e c&ildJs dreams and am:ions. &is is e=tremel# damaging to a #oung mind in t&at it kills

t&e #ounglings self2esteemE con>denceE and am:ion. <enerall# w&en a c&ildE or an# 'ersonE &ears t&is

kind of nega%it# from a 'erson w&o is close to t&eir &earts it is maOorl# destruc%e. Man# mes t&e

G#ou canJt message starts to :ecome :elie%a:le. It onl# originates :ecause t&e 'erson gi%ing t&is G#ou

canJt message &as found t&at t&e# canJt do w&ate%er it is t&emsel%es so t&e# :egin to tell ot&ers t&e#

canJt do it eit&er. ItJs a c#cle :ased on ignoranceE and somemes angerE and is %er# destruc%e to

c&ildren es'eciall#. &is w&ereE man# mes more t&an notE t&e GI canJt mindset originates.

Wit& all t&is :eing saidE e%er#one was once a c&ildE so e%er#one was 'rogrammed to some degree wit&nega%it#. Adults can :e 'rogrammed tooE it;s Oust t&at t&e #oung mind is more easil# susce':le to

'rogramming generall# s'eakingE w&et&er it :e from media or a direct &uman source. &is is also a well2

known conce't studied in 's#c&olog#E wit& nega%e mindset :eing a learned &a:itE and man# of our :ad

&a:its stem from c&ild&ood. W&en we consciousl# createE we want to create a 'osi%e realit# for

oursel%es. 4utE to do t&atE we must >rst tackle our nega%e 'rogramming. Nega%e and misinformed

'rogramming creates a condion t&at can :e referred to as Gnega%e knowledge. Nega%e knowledge

is w&en someone t&inks t&e# &a%e knowledge a:out a su:OectE :ut it was onl# taken in :ased u'on false

~ 58 ~



informaon. &is interferes wit& t&e tri%ium 'rocessE and creates a state in t&e mind of illusion and false

knowledge. We must unlearn our nega%e t&oug&t 'aerns so we can start on a clean slate and >ll t&e

mind wit& 'osi%it#. We must detac& from false teac&ings to get :ack to Gero2'oint or :eginning state

so we can :egin to learn correctl#. A good analog# is t&atE in order to drink a clean glass of waterE #ou

must >rst was& t&e dirt# cu' and :efore #ou >ll it wit& drinking water. &e >rst ste' to im'ro%ement is

cleaning or t&e good #ou 'ut in will :ecome dirt#.

)e !indful of 8our &houghts

+leaning t&e dirt# glass is t&e >rst ste' to aaining a state of serenit# and a clean slate to :uild u'on.

+leaning t&e dirt# glass is :eing mindful of #our t&oug&ts. 4eing mindful of #our t&oug&ts is :eing

consciousl# aware of t&em. As &umansE we are susce':le to get lost in our &eads$t&oug&ts. &e mind is

constantl# working and we endlessl# driQ from one t&oug&t to anot&er wit&out realiing we are lost. We

:ecome like AliceE c&asing t&e ra::it down t&e &ole. A nega%e state of mind results from a com'ulsi%e

nega%e t&oug&t t&at turns into a :elief. It is essenall# a downward s'iral t&at we ride wit&out :eing

aware of it :ecause we were not :eing mindful of our t&oug&ts. No one wants to :e in a nega%e state

of mind. &ink of #our mind as a :oat t&at ma# get &oles. 4# 'raccing awarenessE #ou can a%oid a

sinking s&i' :# idenf#ing reoccurring nega%e t&oug&ts and tossing t&is water out of t&e :oat. 4eing

Gaware is ke# &ere. If we are awareE t&en we can catc& oursel%es red2&anded in t&e act of our :ad

&a:itual t&inking and nega%e t&inking 'aerns. We can :egin to see our :ad &a:its 'la# out and

understand &ow t&e nega%e mind o'erates. If #ou can :ecome aware of #our t&oug&ts and realie t&at

#ou are not #our t&oug&tsE t&en #ou &a%e alread# risen a:o%e t&e &ellis& state of mind. Muc& of t&e

eastern religions and '&iloso'&ies are well aware of t&is. 3uc& '&iloso'&ies and religions suc& as `enE

4udd&ismE and Hinduism focus a great deal on aaining 'eace of mind. Howe%erE '&iloso'&# and

religion are not needed to aain 'eace of mind. +ertain religions and sc&ools of t&oug&t are onl# meant

for guidance 'ur'oses along t&e 'at& to knowing #ourself. Meditaon in its fullness will &el' aain

serenit#. No religionE '&iloso'&#E or sc&ool of t&oug&t needs to :e ad&ered to for t&e 'racce of

meditaon.

0nce #ou &a%e sto''ed :aling #ourselfE and t&e mass of nega%it# is relinRuis&edE onl# t&en will #ou :e

a:le to focus on consciousl# creang t&e realit# t&at #ou want. Man# sc&ools of t&oug&t will teac& t&at

#ou need to constantl# :om:ard #ourself wit& 'osi%e t&inking to enOo# a 'osi%e realit#E :ut it doesn;t

alwa#s work t&at wa#. 0nce t&e distracons are let go of and t&e nega%it# is masteredE t&en #our mind

will automacall# :e o'en to 'osi%it#. Your mind does not &a%e to :e :om:arded wit& 'osi%e

t&oug&ts t&at must :e aainedE :ut #our mind will automacall# reside in a 'osi%e state naturall#. It

will :e eCortlessE :ecause it will :e natural. Most teac&ings will teac& indi%iduals to almost force'osi%it#E :ut e%en 'osi%it# s&ouldnJt :e forced. It is a mistake to force 'osi%it# w&en oneJs mind is full

of nega%it#. &e cu' of water will :e dirt# and onl# cause illness. 0ne cannot 'rogram t&e mind

'osi%el# w&ile nega%e 'rograms are running in t&e :ackground. +lean 'osi%e t&oug&ts cannot last

long in a dirt# mind. &e %iruses must >rst :e taken care of and deleted :efore :ene>cial 'rograms can

:e acce'ted and run 'ro'erl#. BelinRuis& t&e nega%it# and t&en we can >nall# :egin to 'rogram our

minds to create t&e realit# t&at we want for oursel%es.

~ 59 ~



A side note is t&at Gall nega%it# isn;t e='ected to :e gone. We will alwa#s &a%e nega%e t&oug&tsE e%en

t&e most 'osi%e 'eo'leE :ut nega%it# doesn;t &a%e to consume us. We can noce t&ese t&oug&ts and

let t&em 'ass :# wit&out :ecoming t&em :# :elie%ing t&em. 3o don;t e='ect an# nega%e t&oug&ts to

occurE t&e# most likel# willE Oust know t&at t&e# don;t &a%e to consume #ouE :ecome #ouE and take

control o%er #ou.

#ant

0ne must know w&at )s*&e wants in order to know &ow to 'rogram oneJs mind to aain it. Ha%ing a

de>nite 'ur'oseE as'iraonE goalE or Gwant is t&e >rst ste' aQer :rainwas&ing #our mind. 4rainwas&ing

in t&e 'osi%e sense cleansing t&e mind it of its accumulated im'uries. Now #ouJre read# to 'rogram it

wit& w&ate%er it is t&at #ou want to accom'lis&.

W&at is it t&at #ou want( You cannot consciousl# create if #ou do not know t&e answer to t&is RuesonE

and will onl# succeed in creang w&at ot&ers want for #ou. A creator must &a%e a de>nite idea and

%ision for &is$&er creaon. A 'ainter must see t&e 'ainng in t&e mindJs e#e :efore )s*&e creates it or t&e

%ision cannot :e accom'lis&ed. "it&er not&ing will :e drawn or t&e drawing will an unins'ired orunoriginal 'iece. We all are uniRue in our own s'eci>c wantsE so co'#ing t&at of anot&er is Oust :eing

unconscious of our own wantsE and doesn;t make use of our imaginaon$crea%it#.

A want is an intangi:le t&ing at >rstE wit& t&e 'otenal to manifest in our uni%ersal realit#. It all starts in

t&e mindE and t&is is called t&e Law of Mentalism. o create itE #ou must know it. If not knowing w&at

#ou want is t&e 'ro:lemE t&en focus #our energies on wanng to know w&at #ou want. &is stage can :e

me consuming and frustrangE and ma# sound sill#E :ut it is a stage t&at man# go t&roug&. You must

acce't t&at #ou do not consciousl# knowE &owe%er #ou do know and alwa#s &a%e. We know as 'ure

:eings e=actl# w&at we wantE it is onl# w&en we &a%e :een tainted and inuenced :# societ#E and t&e

'eo'le of itE t&at we lose our 'at& and dreams. We &a%e :egun to acce't t&at we must ser%e ot&ersdesires instead of our own wants. Most of us &a%e lost t&e wa#. &is 'assion for w&at #ou want is sll

:uried dee' inside and #ou Oust need to >nd it. &ere is no de>nite me limit to >nd itE it will onl# re%eal

itself to #ou if itJs #our intenon to do so and #ou are read# to know. &e :eaut# of t&is is su:lime. It is

t&e >rst ste'.

Conscious !ental Programming

W&en #ou know w&at it is t&at #ou want to createE t&en #ou can :egin to 'rogram #our mindE s'eci>call#

#our su:conscious. 3ciensts state t&at t&e su:conscious mind is ,E888E888 more 'owerful t&an t&e

conscious mind and t&at t&e conscious mind onl# regulates _ of #our dail# mental ac%it#. &e

su:conscious &as :een long misunderstood. <i%e it a 'rogram and it will act it out. &is is t&e :asis of a

ritual. Bituals are commonl# associated wit& cultsE secre%e organiaonsE and satanismE :ut a ritual is

not in&erentl# nega%e. Bituals can :e used for dark 'ur'osesE :ut t&e# are essenall# a 'rogram t&at

we 'ut in su:conscious minds t&roug& training or &a:itual t&oug&t and acon. Most of us can relate to

t&is conce't :# looking at t&e morning rituals we 'racce. &e alarm clock rings and we &it t&e snooe

onceE twiceE or more. W&en we >nall# decide to :e full# awakeE we usuall# c&eck our '&one for missed

~ 60 ~



callsE messagesE new emailsE and social media alerts. &enE w&en we >nall# make it out of :edE we get

read# :# 'eeingE :rus&ing our teet&E dressingE and so on. 0ur morning roune is an e=am'le of a &a:it

and it is a ritual t&is dail# 'racce is ingrained into our su:conscious mind so we act out t&is 'rogram

wit&out conscious t&oug&t most da#s. &e two wordsE &a:it and ritualE are interc&angea:le w&en

'ertaining to t&e conce't of unconscious acon.

Alt&oug& unconscious acon sounds nega%eE it can :e a good t&ing. Man# of us &a%e good &a:its

alongside t&e :ad. If #ou go to t&e g#m e%er# few da#s da#sE wit& s'oradic 'eriods of a:senceE t&en

t&ere is no &a:it :ecause t&ere is no ritual. Howe%erE if #ou go to t&e g#m t&ree da#s out of t&e week

wit&out failE t&en #ou &a%e created a &a:it. It is now ingrained or 'rogrammed into #our su:conscious

mind so #ou a need to %isit t&e g#m t&ree da#s a week. ItJs 'ossi:le to o%erride t&e 'rogram 'ertaining

to t&e circumstance. W&ate%er o%errides it must :e stronger 'ertaining to #our assigned im'ortance

t&oug&. If #our ritual of ne%er :acking down from a romanc date conicts wit& #our working out

sc&eduleE t&en it is 'resumed t&at one of #our g#m da#s will &a%e to :e 'ut oC. &is ine%ita:l# wouldnJt

desecrate and dismantle t&e ritual. 0ne could sll get :ack on track as long as t&ere arenJt too man#

more conicts. Howe%erE if >%e more dates get in #our wa# of #our working out meE t&en kiss #our

t&ree da# a week g#m regimen :#e :#e. &e onl# wa# to a%oid :reaking #our g#m &a:it &ere would :e to

classif# #our le%el of >tness more im'ortant t&an #our lo%e life. &e &ig&est 'riorit# 're%ails.

&e im'ortant of knowing w&at #ou want and &ow muc& #ou want an# gi%en t&ing cannot :e

em'&asied enoug&. If one does not know t&en one cannot consciousl# create a mental 'rogram. &e

ac%it# would not e%en &a%e a c&ance to :ecome a &a:itE and t&erefore will not :e sustaina:le. W&at is

more im'ortant to #ou- #our romanc life or #our >tness( Your romance and >tness will :ot& suCer if

#ou cannot decide w&at #ou want t&e most. You would :e Ouggling :etween t&e two like a &el'less

sides&ow monke#. &e# would :ot& :e side acts w&en one s&ould :e center stage. &e 'ower of c&oice

is amaing. 4# c&oosing oneE #ou can &a%e #our cake and eat it too. It doesnJt maer w&at one #ou

c&oose )assuming it;s t&e one #ou trul# wanted*E it Oust maers t&at #ouJ%e made a c&oice :ecause now

#ou &a%e a de>nite 'ur'ose or goal.

Wit& an# c&oiceE t&ere is a sacri>ceE :ut it mustnJt :e a detrimental one. 9or e=am'leE assume #ou

de>ned >tness of most im'ortance. You would t&en start e=ercising regularl# and e%entuall# reac& #our

desired le%el of >tness. NowE since #ou &a%e de>ned #our 'riorit#E #ou can tell t&e 'erson in #our

romanc life #our >tness sc&edule and &ow muc& it means to #ou. &e# ma# understand and ask to

sc&edule dates for w&en #ouJre a%aila:leE or t&e# ma# not take kindl# to it and get u'set. If t&e# canJt

understand t&en #ou s&ould consider if t&at 'artner is rig&t for #ou orE if t&e# areE reconsider #our

'riories. In t&e endE #ou must know e=actl# w&at #ou want and declare it. It ma# c&angeE :ut t&at >rm

and con>dent decision2making a:ilit# will determine &ow well #ou will :e a:le to 'rogram #our mind to

ac&ie%e #our as'ired goals. &e 'ower of t&e su:conscious mind can onl# :e ulied :# determined

c&oice.

Inspiration

Ins'iraon is a 'owerful tool to for t&e genesis of creaon. 5liing autosuggeson or self2&#'nosisE wit&

~ 61 ~



ins'iraonE is a :eauful 'lace to :egin on t&e 'at& to re'rogramming t&e mind. "%er#one &as t&e a:ilit#

to 'rogram t&eir mind using t&is met&od if t&e# feel stuck and don;t know w&at to do to mo%e forward.

9illing #our mind and senses wit& ins'iraon will :egin to take eCect on #ou and can onl# :e of :ene>t.

Ins'iraon is in&erentl# inside of #ouE :ut t&ere are man# mediums t&roug& w&ic& it can :e e='ressed. It

can :e drawn from ot&er 'eo'le t&roug& mediums suc& as wringE 'oemsE musicE mo%iesE and s'eec&es.

+oming from a dark 'laceE it is a good idea to constantl# surround #ourself wit& ins'iraon. &is dark

'lace can :e wit&out &o'e for an#t&ing or an#oneE es'eciall# oursel%es. &is state of :eing &as caused us

to forget t&e ins'iraon wit&inE so we must somemes seek to e='erience ins'iraon from ot&ers. It

doesnJt e%en &a%e to :e a 'erson we can >nd ins'iraon in man# t&ingsE like a tree or a sunrise. NatureJs

wonders are e=tremel# ins'iring to t&e &uman mindE :ecause nature is t&e manifestaon of t&e uni%erse

on "art&. We get to see t&e in>nite di%ine consciousness e='ress itself in a li%ing art form. 4eing in

nature is Oust as ins'iring as anot&er &uman :eingJs 'assionate s'eec& or seemingl# miraculous feat.

As far as s&ared &uman ins'iraon goesE it is :est to gain somet&ing from it e%er# da#E for a long enoug&

me t&at It :ecomes em:edded into #our su:conscious as #our own 'osi%e mindset. 3ee if #ou can

download #our fa%orite s'eec& into MP format and install it on #our iPod or anot&er de%ice so #ou can

listen to it e%er# da#. Listen to it o%er and o%er again unl it is almost like a song t&at is stuck in #our

&ead. +ut out all t&e music and ot&er media wit& no ins'iring or u'liQing messages wit& su:stance.

!ownload 'ictures t&at ins'ire #ou and t&at resem:le w&at #ou wantE w&at #ou want to :eE or w&ere

#ou want to go in life. Look at t&ese 'ictures e%er# da# in a rela=ed state of mind and feel like #ou are

e='eriencing w&ate%er t&ese 'ictures re'resent to #ou. Listen to t&e t&oug&ts t&ese 'ictures :ring out of

#ou. Watc& ins'iring >lms wit& 'assion and good acng. 9eel t&e 'osi%e message t&at is :eing

'ortra#ed t&roug& t&e moral of t&e stor# and learn from it. !o t&e same t&ing wit& a no%el if #ou rat&er

read. !o t&is man# mes #ouJll >nd t&at #ou get somet&ing new out of an# work of ins'iraon eac&

me #ou &ear itE feel itE or see it.

Life Purpose

Ins'iraon is alwa#s &el'ing us to make a 'osi%e c&oice. It;s acknowledged t&at somemes a c&oice is

e=tremel# c&allenging to makeE es'eciall# a great c&oice t&at in%ol%es our life 'ur'ose. 3omemes we

Oust need ins'iraon t&at will ins'ire us to know oursel%es. If #ouJre not alread# knowledgea:le of selfE

ins'iraon will 'ose t&e great Rueson 'ertaining to life 'ur'ose- GW&at can #ou not connue to li%e

wit&out doing( A great Rueson like t&is forces u'on our soul an answer to our inRuir#. !ee' down we

all know t&e answers to all of our Ruesons. ItJs 'erfectl# >ne to not consciousl# know e%er#t&ing a:out

#ourself. 0ur souls run dee' wit& in>nite e='eriencesE w&ic& t&e >nite mind cannot alwa#s com're&end.

Life 'ur'ose is not sim'le im'ortantE it is w&# we are ali%e. "%er#one is ali%e for a reason. It is our dut# to

realie our 'ur'ose. We all know we are &ere for a reason :ased on t&e framework of t&e G&e 3ource

and uni%erse. Most of us know as c&ildren w&at we want to do :ecause we are closer to our source of

in>nite intelligence as #ounglings. We dream of doing somet&ing we lo%eE :ut somew&ere along t&e line

of growing u' t&ose dreams get s&ot down :# G'raccalit#. As we grow olderE most of us forget our lifeJs

'ur'oseE and we ask oursel%es t&e Rueson Gw&at am I e=actl# &ere to do(

~ 62 ~



Wit&out 'ur'oseE our life &as no direcon. We cannot consciousl# create wit&out direcon and focusE so

we :ecome lostE like a c&ild wit&out a 'arent or guardian. We can create wit&out knowing our life

'ur'oseE :ut w&at we create :ecomes more ful>lling or rewarding if our creaons are in line wit& our

'ur'ose. W&en we donJt create in line wit& our 'ur'oseE t&e manifestaons usuall# work against us and

make our lessons e%en more c&allenging. &is :ook was created out of 'ur'oseE and #ouE t&e readerE

now know t&e di%ine 'ower of 'ur'ose.

Action? .ocus ' #illpower

It is said t&at G&e All is 'ure willE and it is t&at Gwill t&at &as Oum'2started t&e e='ansion of t&e

uni%erse. o iniate t&e :ig :angE 'ure Gwill was necessar#E and t&at Gwill can onl# come from a source

of intelligence. +reaon is s#non#mous wit& aconE and for acon to occurE t&ere needs to :e a directed

will. It is argued w&et&er we can G&a%e will'ower or if it is somet&ing t&at canJt :e &ad. "it&er wa#E

will'ower 'la#s a signi>cant role our a:ilit# to create our wanted realit#. &is is t&e diCerence :etween

t&e success of diCerent 'eo'les )and :# successE I meant if one is li%ing t&eir wanted life*. It is commonl#

t&oug&t t&at will'ower is somet&ing e='ressed t&roug& us t&at we cannot 'ossess itE onl# &arness t&ea:ilit# to allow its ow t&roug& us. 4ecause will'ower is a forceE it makes sense t&at it cannot necessaril#

:e contained :# a :eingE #et it can :e c&anneled t&roug& one. &e widt& of t&e c&annel determines &ow

muc& will can ow t&roug&. 0ur willing strengt& can grow or weakenE Oust like a muscle. &e 'assage or

c&annel t&at t&e will'ower ows t&roug& resem:les t&e muscle. Will'ower is :ut anot&er name for t&e

di%ine 'rimordial force originang from t&e source of creaon.

&e c&akra s#stemE w&ic& is t&e :asis of man# s'iritual :eliefsE &as its t&ird c&akra as t&e seat of

will'ower. It is referred to as t&e Gsolar 'le=usE and t&e :alance of t&is c&akra determines our a:ilit# to

take acon. &e solar 'le=us is :ased u'on solar energ# and stands for doingE ac&ie%ingE aconE and

will'ower. &ese are also ke# descri'ons for t&at of t&e astrological sign of GLeo. Leo is re'resented :#

t&e 'owerful animal s'irit of t&e lion. Leo is ruled :# t&e sunE 'resents its astrological me in t&e season

of summerE and e='resses itself :# t&e element of >re. &ese s#m:ols all re'resent warmt&E 'owerE

am:ionE mo%aonE strengt&E will'owerE and acon. &is is w&# itJs im'ortant to kee' a )w*&olisc

%iew of t&ings. "%er#t&ing is connected.

&e a:ilit# to c&annel will'ower eXcientl# is 'aramount to creang t&e realit# t&at #ou want. 3ome of

t&e dark lords e='ress strong will'ower and use it to rule o%er weak2willed masses. 3trong will 're%ails

o%er weakE and it is t&at disncon w&ic& se'arates t&e %arious le%els of :eing &ere in t&e dense

material 'lane. "%er#one is on a diCerent le%el 'ertaining to will'ower. &is is not to sa# one indi%idual is

:eer t&an anot&erE :ut it is sa#ing t&at t&e indi%idual e='ressing more will'ower will :e moreinuenal in t&eir a:ilit# to create t&e realit# t&e# so c&oose. Bemem:er t&at #our current state or le%el

does not determine w&ere #ouJre going to :e. &is fact inslls &o'e wit&in eac& one of usE :ecause it is a

reminder t&at we all &a%e t&e 'otenal to e%ol%e and :ecome stronger or Ge='ress strengt&. "%en t&e

'eo'le at t&e Gto' can fall. &is is w&ere t&e law of r&#t&m comes into 'la#. "%er#t&ing e=ce't trut& Is

im'ermanent and su:Oect to c&angeE including ruling 'ower structures. 5ni%erse is 5ni2%erseE or one

c&ange. &e uni%erse is alwa#s mo%ingE c&angingE and e%ol%ing. ItJs 'art of t&e e:: and ow of t&e

~ 63 ~



r&#t&m and c#cle of life.

o sum it u'E t&oug&ts need to :e su''lemented :# will'ower in a:le to get t&ings done. Wit&out

will'owerE t&e t&oug&t will :e in control of #ou instead of #ou :eing t&e master of G#our t&oug&ts. You

will :e reacng to a t&oug&t rat&er t&an res'ondingE and not e%en :e conscious of it. In lifeE we ne%er

want to :e t&e %icm of reacon we want to :e a master of res'onse. Will'ower kee's us mindful or

conscious of our t&oug&ts and aconsE and t&erefore e=em'li>es t&e a:ilit# to consciousl# create t&e

realit# we want.

4# resisng certain urges t&at we are accustomed toE we &a%e t&e a:ilit# to strengt&en our will'ower.

Bemem:er t&at t&e c&annel will'ower ows t&roug& is like t&at of a muscle. &e most rewarding wa# to

work out t&e muscle of will'ower is to graduall# :uild it u'. It wouldnJt :e wise to liQ ,88 kilograms

w&en :enc& 'ressing #our >rst me. A serious inOur# can occur if one Oum's too far a&ead of oneJs self

and is not read#. GBome wasnJt :uilt in a da#E as t&e old adage goes. Howe%erE t&ere are in>nite

'ossi:ilies t&at e=ist in e%er# moment. If someone is a:le to ta' into t&e sourceE suc& t&ings as

Gmiracles can occur. We must :e o:Oec%e :ut we must also &a%e an o'en mind to in>nite 'ossi:ilies.

You donJt &a%e to :e a:le to walk t&roug& a wallE :ut #ou must :elie%e t&at it is 'ossi:le. &ere are

'eo'le t&at can Ruit t&e e=tremel# addic%e &a:it of smoking cigarees aQer one momentJs decision.

5nfortunatel#E some 'eo'le struggle t&eir w&ole lifeJs aem'ng to Ruit t&is :ad &a:it.

Anot&er factor t&at 'la#s a role in our acons is focus. 9ocus is c&anneling our will'ower towards a single

goal. 9ocus &as e=treme 'owerE :ecause all t&e energ# is owing in one direcon. &is is w&# a

magnif#ing glass can :urn t&roug& somet&ing :# &arnessing t&e sunJs ra#s in a concentrated manner. &e

magnif#ing glass focuses t&e ra# of t&e sun to a single 'oint. Wit&out t&e magnif#ing glassE t&e ra#s can

make o:Oects %er# &otE :ut t&e# will not :urn a &ole. &is laser2like focus makes t&e will'ower we

e='ress muc& more construc%e.

9nowing

&is is w&# knowing w&at #ou want is so :ene>cial. &e most 'owerful of #our wants is w&at #ou decide

to :e #our 'riorit# :ecause it is &ere t&at #ou focus #our energ# and 'racce. 4# knowing w&at #ou

wantE #ou set a target or goal for #our intenonE will'owerE and grit. "%en if #ou e='ress a weak willE #ou

are sll on t&e :rig&t side of t&ingsE :ecause t&e focus will am'lif# #our will'ower e='onenall#. 9rom

t&ereE itJs onl# an u'ward s'iraling Oourne# to #our desn#. Kust kee' strengt&ening #our will :# resisng

urges or :ad &a:its to #our :est a:ilit# and 'ace.

Not knowing almost kee's one in a 'urgator# state. Your life will seem to :e at a standsllE or e%en :egin

to re%erse from #our wanted state. 4esides trut&E t&e onl# constant is c&angeE so it seems sense t&at if

#ouJre not e%ol%ingE #ou will :egin to de%ol%e.

W&et&er it takes 'eo'le >%e #ears to realie w&at t&e# wantE &alf a lifemeE or e%en a full lifemeE

knowing is ine%ita:le. &is is :ecause knowing located wit&inE so it;s w&at we alwa#s come :ack to aQer

a searc&. &e c&allenge is to consciousl# know w&at it is t&at we want. If #ouJre reading t&is :ookE t&en it

~ 64 ~



is o:%ious t&at #ou are on t&e 'at& of knowledge and trut&. Acce'ng ignorance is a c&oice in t&e

informaon age of our me. &e 'rocess of Gknowing :egins wit& a c&oice- t&e c&oice to know.

+&oosing knowledge is one of t&e wisest and most rewarding of decisions #ou can make. 4# focusing

u'on Gknowing and geZng t&e answer to #our RuesonsE life will re%eal t&e answers to #ou. @nowing is

certainl# a :eauful t&ing.

.aith

9ait& is oQen mes associated wit& religionE :ut it was not :orn from it. 9ait& is a state of mind and &as

e=isted for as long as intelligence. 9ait& is also t&e last maOor ste' to t&e successful creaon of t&e realit#

#ou want. Let us recall t&e ste's we &a%e co%ered so far- t&e >rst ste' is to clean t&e mind of w&at is

unneededE t&e second ste' is to >gure out w&at #ou want out of life )i.e. #our 'ur'ose*E t&e t&ird ste' is

to consciousl# re'rogram #our mind to aain t&at de>nite 'ur'oseE and t&e fourt& ste' is to maintain

focus and de%elo' t&e strengt& of #our will'ower. &is lea%es t&e >Q& ste'E w&ic& is to a''l# fait&.

9ait& translates to knowing t&at a source of creaon and in>nite intelligence e=istsE and its will workst&roug& us. Beal fait& comes from knowledge of t&e seen and Gunseen. 9ait& is t&e trust in t&at t&e

knowledge we &a%e is ser%ing our 'ur'ose. 4lind fait& is following informaon :ased on t&e 'remise t&at

it can onl# :e acce'ted :# fait& and not :e tested. Beal fait& is tested and t&e uni%ersal laws are &ere to

ser%e us. &is is an orderl# uni%erse :ased u'on natural lawsE and fait& in w&at #ou want to accom'lis&

:ecomes eas# w&en #ou &a%e t&e knowledge t&at t&ere is no instance in w&ic& t&ese laws do not e=ist in

t&e uni%erse. We must know t&e uni%ersal laws and understand &ow to work wit& t&em :efore we can

&a%e fait& in t&em. If e%er#t&ing was c&aoc or random and not :ased on an intelligent designer t&at 'ut

t&ese natural laws into 'laceE t&en fait& wouldn;t make sense or a''ear to &a%e an# %alue. &ankfull#E

we know t&is uni%erse is :ased u'on order. Ha%ing fait& is :eing connected wit& t&e uni%ersal mindE

w&ic& is t&e source of in>nite intelligence. All fear is lost w&en t&is occursE :ecause fear cannot e=ist in astate of knowledge. 0ne can refer to t&is as :eing di%ine. Howe%erE it is not Oust enoug& to &a%e fait& it

must :e a''lied to #our needsE wantsE main goal or de>nite 'ur'ose.

A''lied fait& is going :e#ond :elie%ing to taking acon. A''lied fait& is t&e ac%e distri:uon of fait&

t&roug& acons. A''lied fait& is real fait&. 9ait& wit&out acon is &o'eless and cannot &el' an#one

im'ro%e t&eir life circumstances. &is is w&ere so man# doctrines fail. &ese doctrines :elie%e &a%ing

fait& alone is t&e soluonE :ut t&is is a &alf2trut&. &e ne=t ste' is to a''l# t&at fait&E for wit&out

a''licaonE 'eo'le will sta# down w&ile t&e# &o'e for someone to sa%e t&em e%en t&oug& t&e# &a%enJt

'ut in t&e necessar# work to sa%e t&emsel%es. &e trut& is- onl# #ou can sa%e #ourself. &e uni%erse can

t&row #ou a life :oatE :ut #ou &a%e to :e willing to take t&e risk and swim o%er to it. 4elie%ing fait& is all

t&at is necessar# is like t&inking someone else can swim to t&e life:oat for #ou. GYou and onl# #ou must

swim if #ou want to li%e.

Kust like will'owerE fait& can also :e strengt&ened like a muscle. 9ait& isnJt usuall# accessi:le to someone

w&om doesn;t 'racce it. 9ortunatel#E fait& is grown t&roug& a''licaon. o >nd an a''licaonE #ou

must &a%e a s'eci>c want or su:Oect to a''l# #our fait& to. Wit& t&e focus of aaining a certain goalE #ou

now &a%e a su:Oect or o:Oect in w&ic& to a''l# #our fait&. 3trengt&ening #our fait& is not alwa#s

~ 65 ~



succeeding in aaining #our dreamE :ut it is nocing t&e 'rogress t&at #ou &a%e made. It is nocing &ow

t&e uni%erse &as listened to #our 'lan and &as o'ened u' Grandom coincidences 2 w&ic& are reall#

s#nc&ronisc o''ortunies t&at #ou &a%e taken 'art in creang S in #our fa%or. If aenon and res'ect is

rig&Tull# 'aid to t&isE t&en #our fait& will grow insurmounta:l#. It will :e muc& easier to aain #our

Gwant if #ou connue to act on #our desire. Howe%erE if &onor isn;t 'aid to w&at #ou create and #ou

dismiss t&ings as mere coincidenceE #our fait& is :eing neglected and will :e destro#ed. Life is magical if

#ou c&oose it to :e.

Dou0t

!ou:t is ine%ita:le on t&e 'at& of knowledgeE :ecause we are usuall# in a state of nescience a:out

somet&ing. NescienceE againE is w&ere knowledge is not currentl# a%aila:le. Howe%erE e%en if we cannot

know somet&ing in a gi%en 'oint in meE we must not let dou:t consume us. LeZng e=cessi%e dou:t or

nega%it# consume #ou will cause #ou to make erroneous assum'onsE w&ic& &inders #our 'rogress and

can destro# #our fait&. 3killfull# dou:ng is Ruesoning w&et&er somet&ing is trut& or not. Wit&out t&is

form of agreea:le dou:tE no one would e%er t&ink for t&emsel%es and acce't e%er#t&ing 'resented to

t&em as fact. &is would :e c&oosing t&e road of :lind fait& and ignorance. !ou:t or Rueson e%en w&at

#ou :elie%e to :e trueE so t&at #ou can strengt&en #our fait&.

If dou:t is ne%er 'resent t&en t&ere is no o''osing force to #our fait& and :eliefs a:sence of an

o''osing force means t&ere isnJt an# room to grow and :ecome stronger. 3omemes dou:t is :ene>cial.

If #ou ke't doing t&e same t&ing re'eousl# and e='ected a diCerent resultE des'ite connuous failureE

t&en #ou would :e :e&a%ing insanel#. !ou:ng t&e 'lan;s design &el's #ou make t&e necessar#

re%isions. Fuesoning will ine%ita:l# lead to answers. &ese answers will &el' #ou to take t&e correct

ste's in decision2making 'rocesses and a%oid :eing misled on #our Oourne#. &ese answers and gained

knowledge wouldnJt &a%e come into :eing if no Ruesoning$dou:t was 'ut fort&. 0f courseE t&ere is a

limit to reasona:le dou:t and t&e :ene>ts of dou:t. An e=treme amount of dou:t will nega%el# aCect

t&e fait& #ou &a%e in #ourself and will lead #ou to :ecome o%erl# crical. It can also cause confusion for

one to :ring fort& so man# Ruesons :ecause t&e >nite$conscious mind can onl# &andle so man#

Ruesons at once. Like e%er#t&ing elseE a :alance must :e maintained.

5nskillful dou:tE or dis:elief in #ourselfE will :e destruc%e to #our 'rogress. It is wise to Rueson

w&et&er #ou are taking t&e rig&t acons to aain #our wanted outcomeE :ut somemes t&is can :e

o%erdone. Ha%ing fait& and a''l#ing it is not to sa# #ou cannot Rueson if w&at #ou are doing is rig&t. It

is sa#ing t&at #ou s&ould not Rueson w&et&er #ou will o:tain #our results w&en taking t&e necessar#

ste's. You can :e sure t&at if #ou use a''lied fait& consistentl#E t&at #ou will alwa#s aain #our wanted

outcome. W&ate%er t&e mind can concei%e and :elie%e it can ac&ie%e.

&e onl# e=ce'on to t&is rule is t&at #ou cannot control e=ternal su:Oects or o:OectsE suc& as 'eo'le or

e%ents. You can onl# control #ourself.

.ailure

@nowledge doesn;t constute e%er#t&ing #ou need to 'rogress along #our 'at&. You can know

~ 66 ~



e%er#t&ing t&ere is to know a:out a 'arcular su:OectE :ut if #ou a''l# t&is knowledge incorrectl# #ou

ma# fail. Bemem:erE not&ing is &a''enstanceE so t&e onl# wa# #ou can reall# fail is to t&ink #ou &a%e

failed. &ings t&at &a''en can;t un2&a''en. 9ailure can onl# :e 'ercei%ed in t&e 'ast or feared in t&e

future. &e onl# t&ing t&at #ou can c&ange is w&at &asn;t #et &a''enedE and t&at starts in t&e G'resent

moment. &is c&ange will t&en manifest in t&e future. &e onl# t&ing we can control is our c&oices and

acons. Man# of t&e results$eCects of our acons$causes take some me for us to o:Oec%el# see. We

cannot e='ect our results to a''ear e=actl# as we t&oug&t t&e#;d come a:out. &ere ma# :e a greater

and dee'er &idden am:ionE in t&e 'rocess of manifestaonE t&at we ma# not e%en consciousl# realie.0ur 'ercei%ed failure could &a%e :een la#ing t&e foundaon and clearing t&e 'at& to ac&ie%e our

greatest success.

&e :est wa# to a%oid failure is to not e='ect it or 'ercei%e it as suc&. &is is not den#ing t&e trut&E

:ecause t&e trut& a:out w&o we are can onl# e=ist in t&e 'resent moment. "%er#t&ing t&at &as alread#

&a''ened to usE w&et&er 'ercei%ed failure or notE &as aided in our 'ersonal e%oluon. 9ailing is falling

down and not geZng :ack u'. All we &a%e to do is make t&e c&oiceE in t&e momentE to get :ack u'.

"ssenall# we can eit&er c&oose to :e a %icmE and failE or c&oose to :e t&e %ictorE and ac&ie%e our

dreams.

~ 67 ~



Chapter @: Diet1s Affect on uality of Life

&is c&a'ter is 'er&a's t&e most im'ortant in regards to mastering #our life :ecause t&e informaon

s&ared &ere is &ig&l# transformaonal. We are :eginning to realie t&e tremendous im'ortance of dietE

:ot& on its own and in conOuncon wit& e=ercise or :eing ac%e. W&en it comes to taking control of #our

life its %alue is clearE :ecause no maer w&at met&od #ou master or em'lo# to transform #our life >rstE

diet will sooner or later come u' along t&e wa#. 4efore #ou c&oose to 'ut it on t&e :ack :urner or makeit #our 'riorit#E #ou s&ould know t&at diet &as t&e 'ower to cata'ult #our life in t&e direcon #ou want to

go neglecng it will onl# slow 'rogressE and ma# e%entuall# stall 'rogress alt&oug&.

"%er#t&ing we e='erience :ecomes a 'art of us in some wa#. &e old adage t&at G#ou are w&at #ou eat

is enrel# true. W&at we consume :ecomes a 'art of us. &e food is assimilated into our :od# at a

cellular le%el. &e &uman :od# goes t&roug& a c#clical 'rocess of renewal. 4illions of cells die oC and

new ones are regenerated to re'lace t&e old. !iCerent ssues &a%e diCerent lifes'ans- t&e e'idermis or

outermost la#er of t&e skin is rec#cled e%er# two weeksE w&ile t&e skeletal s#stem can take as muc& as

ten #ears to full# regenerate. &e :od# ma# seem like a 'ermanent structureE :ut Ruite t&e contrar# is

true. 0ur :od# is a self2renewingE restructuringE c&angingE and transforming organism.

W&at we c&oose to 'ut into our mout&s alwa#s &as an eCect on t&e :od#E and t&us t&e mindE and

t&erefore our life. &is is t&e Law of +orres'ondence and Law of +ause and "Cect or @arma. A gluonous

indi%idual w&o indulges in t&e un&ealt&iestE &ea%iestE and most low energ# foods will e='erience t&e

nega%e conseRuence of t&ose acons. W&et&er it is weig&t gainE let&arg#E a low immune s#stemE

and$or c&ronic diseaseE somet&ing undesira:le will come out of it now or in t&e future- t&is is natural

law.

We all noce t&at adolescence oQen comes wit& a sense of Gno conseRuences 'ertaining to dietar#

c&oices. A #oung 'erson ma# eat t&e worst diet and sll seem to glow to a degree or &a%e a slim :od#

s&a'eE :ut t&is does not mean t&e# are not suCering t&e conseRuences internall#. Now or in t&e futureE

t&ese :e&a%iors will create an un&ealt&# :eing. If t&e diet is connued into adult&oodE t&en t&e nega%e

eCects will :egin to 'resent itself outward for e%er#one else to see- 'oor mo:ilit#E o:esit#E un&ealt&#

looking skin or &airE and %isi:le disease. !iet not onl# aCects an indi%idual;s :od#E :ut also t&e mind.

Man# mental issues are associated wit& an un&ealt&# diet and 'resent in adult&ood.

#hy does everything 0ad feel so good

ItJs actuall# comical to t&ink a:outE :ut it can also seem cruel at >rst. Ne%er fearE :ecause in mastering

#our life #ou realie &ow good #ou feel w&en engaging in acons of :ene%olence. &e :ad feels good

:ecause it is an addiconE w&ic& &as its roots in #our own 's#c&olog#. YesE certain foods can :ecome an

addicon tooE :ecause of t&e intense G'leasure associated t&ese unnatural foods. Almost all t&ings

destruc%e t&at 'eo'le indulge in come wit& Ruick 'leasure t&at dissol%es e%en RuickerE lea%ing t&e

indi%idual wit& less of &im$&erself. !estruc%e 'leasures come from instant gra>caon or sasfacon.

"%er#t&ing comes wit& a 'riceE and it must :e asked if t&e s&ort 'leasure is wort& t&e long suCering.

~ 68 ~



3omet&ing ma# feel good 'ertaining to t&e >%e sensesE :ut don;t let 'leasure control #ou or it will

:ecome an addicon t&at will end u' destro#ing #ou. A''reciate certain 'leasuresE :ut align #ourself

wit& %alues suc& as trut& and natural lawE and #ou will li%e :ot& 'leasura:l# and 'roduc%el#. Indulging

in 'leasures is not e%ilE :ut it &as t&e 'otenal to st#mie 'rogress and$or re%erse it if #ou &a%e not

idenf#ing 'osi%e 'leasures. Posi%e 'leasures are t&ose t&at aid in t&e creaon of #our goal.

&he Dangers of Dairy

0ne of t&e reasons dair# is &armful to &uman &ealt& is :ecause it contains &ig& amounts of t&e female

&ormone estrogen. &is 'oses maOor 'ro:lems for womenE in 'arcularE :ut it is :# no means &ealt&# for

men eit&er. &e world;s largest com're&ensi%e and e'idemiological stud# on nutrionE G&e +&ina

3tud#E found t&at a lifeme e='osure to estrogen is around t&ree mes more common among

Westernied women t&an rural +&inese women. &is leads to &ig&er rates of 're%enta:le diseases in t&e

Western world. &e e=tension of t&e female re'roduc%e life c#cle is ari:uted to increased risk for

:reast cancer. A diet ric& in animal foods increases female &ormone le%elsE lowers t&e age for menarc&eE

and 'ost'ones t&e age of meno'ause. All eCects corres'ond wit& factors t&at increase :reast cancer

risk.

Howe%erE dair# not onl# increases t&e risk of cancer in womenE :ut men too. "%en rawE organicE grass2fed

dair# straig&t from t&e farm contains o%er D8 ac%eE naturall#2occurring &ormones for t&e &ealt& and

growt& of t&e calf. 0f t&ese ac%e &ormonesE one of a 'owerful growt& &ormones is called Ginsulin2like

growt& factor ,E or I<9, for s&ort. It is considered to fuel cancer growt& :# t&e medical communit# and

not Oust :reast cancersE :ut ot&ers suc& as 'rostate and colon cancer. I<9, also leads to ra'id o:esit#E

:ecause it;s a growth hormone. &e naturall# occurring &ormones in milk were designed to &el' an 8

'ound calf Ruick grow into a ,888 'ound cow wit&in one #ear;s me. No wonder w&# t&e naon;s wit&t&e &ig&est consum'on of dair# also t&e &ig&est rates of o:esit# +ow;s milk is designed for t&e growt&

and nutrion of a :a:# cow onl#. Human milk is for t&e &uman :a:#E and aQer weeningE a c&ild can grow

&ealt&full# on 'lant foods alone. Adults &a%e no reason to drink milk from &umansE let alone anot&er

mammalE :ecause t&e# are alread# grown.

&e &ormones in cow;s milk aren;t t&e onl# t&ing correlated wit& cancer growt&. &e 'rotein called

Gcasein &as :een found to ac%ate tumor growt& in ratsE as well. "%en t&oug& rat anatom# is not

analogous to &umansE t&is is strong e%idence for t&e dangers of dair#. Bats are classi>ed as o''ortunisc

omni%ores w&o oQen eat &er:i%orous diets in t&e wildE w&ic& is also &ow tradional science la:els

&umansE so t&e fact t&at t&e# de%elo'ed cancer des'ite t&e '&#siological eRui'ment to &andle animal

'rotein &el's demonstrate t&e unnatural eCects of dair#. 9urt&ermoreE rats &a%e a muc& s&orter lifes'an

w&ic& make it diXcult for cancer to 'resent wit&in t&e mes'an of an e='erimentE so t&e fact t&at t&is

occurred w&en tesng casein s&ows t&e danger of t&is milk 'rotein.

Milk is also known to contain :loodE fecesE :acteriaE and 'us. &e 'us is referred to in science and trade

Oournals as Gsomac cellsE :ut it;s Oust a sanitar# term and for gooe# 'us. +ommercial regulaons allow

7D8E888 somac cells$'us and 8E888 li%e :acteria in eac& cu:ic cenmeter of cow;s milk. &e milk is

~ 69 ~



usuall# 'asteuried Ruickl# for ,D secondsE at lower tem'eratures around ,6, degrees 9a&ren&eitE e%en

t&oug& it is suggested t&at we :oil water at ,9 for minutes in order to sanie it. Howe%erE e%en if

&eated for longerE 'asteuriaon is onl# a sanitaon 'rocedureE not a remo%al 'rocess. &e 'us and

ot&er secreons remain in t&e milk.

&he Dangers of Animal Protein

Man# ot&er cancers are associated wit& dietar# c&oicesE es'eciall# &ig& consum'on of animal foods.

It;s not Oust t&e animal 'rotein found in dair# t&at is carcinogenicE :ut animal 'rotein found in all meats

too. Animal 'rotein signals t&e li%er to 'roduce e=cess amounts of t&e cancer 'romong &ormone I<92,E

t&e same &ormone found naturall# in dair#. &e :od# doesn;t know &ow to react to t&e animal 'rotein

so t&e li%er start 'um'ing out I<92, to signal t&e :od# to grow. Howe%erE as a full# grown adultE cell

growt& is somet&ing t&at s&ould :e slowed down not s'eed u'. &is unnatural ra'id cell growt& s'urred

:# t&e animal 'rotein can s'ur tumor growt&. Animal 'roducts &a%e :een linked to ari:ung to t&e

growt& of all cancers. G&e +&ina 3tud# and mul'le 'eer2re%iewed scien>c arcles outline t&is

&ea%il#.

Worldwide studies found t&at 'o'ulaons wit& diets &ig& in animal foods and low in dietar# >:er &a%e

&ig& risk of de%elo'ing and rates of 'rostate cancer. 9i:er is onl# found in 'lant foods and it is t&e onl#

food com'onent t&at kee's our diges%e s#stem owing smoot&l#. Is it t&at >:er is e=tremel# 'rotec%eE

or is it t&at meat and dair# are e=tremel# insalu:rious to our &ealt&( 3cience &asnJt tested to see if >:er

cures cancerE :ut it is known in t&e scien>c communit# t&at animal 'roducts 'romote cancer. "%idence

:ased on sur%e#ed 'eo'les of diCerent naons s&ow t&at more de%elo'ed naons &a%e diets low in >:er

and ric& in animal 'roductsE w&ile less de%elo'ed naons &a%e diets &ig& in >:er and low in animal

:ased 'roducts. In 3out& AfricaE 'eo'le w&o are more abuent eat a de%elo'ed naonJs dietE and t&e

'oor 'eo'le of t&is naon eat a diet &ig& in >:er and low in animal 'roducts. &e stud# found t&at t&ese

two diCerent classes e=&i:it a:normall# dis'arate rates of colon cancer. &e 'oorer class e=&i:ited muc&

less colon cancer t&an t&e more abuent class wit&in t&e same countr#. &e conclusion re%eals t&at a

'lant2:ased diet is ari:uted to lowering t&e risk of cancerE #et again.

Cardiovascular Disease

4ut cancer is not t&e disease res'onsi:le for t&e most res'onsi:le deat&s related to diet. According to

t&e World Healt& 0rganiaon )WH0*E t&e num:er one cause of deat& across t&e world is isc&emic &eartdiseaseE causing 7.1 million deat&s in 8,. In t&e 5nited 3tatesE t&e +enters for !isease +ontrol tells us

t&at &eart disease is t&e leading cause of deat&E wit& o%er D?8E888 'eo'le d#ing eac& #ear from it.

+ancer comes in close secondE at o%er D78E888 'eo'le deat&s eac& #ear. Wit&out a dou:tE cardio%ascular

disease is a maOor 'ro:lem on a world scale and in t&e western worldE and it will onl# grow worse as

'eo'le ado't western2st#le diets due to glo:aliaon.

&e c&olesterol and saturated fats in animal 'roducts &a%e :een found to ari:ute to &eart disease.

~ 70 ~



&ere is anot&er m#t& t&at we need to drink cow;s milk and consume ot&er dair# 'roducts to o:tain

calcium. !air# 'roducts are &ig& in calciumE &owe%erE it &as :een found t&at t&e# also leec& calcium and

'&os'&orous from our :ones to 'ro%ide an acid2:ase :uCer to 'rotect our :odies from acidosis. &is

'rocess causes our :ones to weaken o%er meE leading to osteo'orosis and ot&er :one diseases.

Western countries w&ic& consume more dair# actuall# &a%e &ig&er rates of osteo'orosis t&an de%elo'ing

countries. &ere is 'lent# of calcium in t&e 'lant2:ased diet. It is 'arcularl# a:undant in greensE

:roccoliE lenlsE >gsE orangesE kiwiE oatsE seedsE and so#.

)usting the )%, !yth

LastE :ut not leastE we must dis'el t&e m#t& a:out 4,. &ere are so man# m#t&s relang to &ealt& and

t&e %egan diet out t&ereE :ut t&is is one of t&e most 'o'ular- t&at 4, de>cienc# is strictl# a %egan issueE

and t&at &umans can get 4, :# eang animal es&. According to a stud# from uQs 5ni%ersit#E an

a%erage of ?_ of 'eo'le are de>cient in 4,. &e stud# was done wit& a random sam'le 'o'ulaon

t&at gi%es us a good re'resentaon on &ow t&is a''lies to &umans on a world scale. We also know t&at

%egans consist of a %er# small 'ercentage of t&e 'o'ulaonE a:out an esmated _. It doesn;t take a

stascian to see we &a%e a maOor dis'arit# in 'ercentages &ere. &usE t&ese de>ciencies do not resultfrom a %egan diet.

&e 'ro:lem is not onl# t&e sourceE :ut &ow eCec%el# 4, can :e a:sor:ed. If t&e :od# isn;t clean and

eXcient t&en it can;t assimilate certain nutrients and t&is is t&e case for man# 'eo'le w&om eat animal

'roducts. &e :od# is full of internal mucus and sludgeE caused :# animal 'roductsE w&ic& 're%ents man#

nutrients from :eing adsor:ed. 4, is a nutrient 'roduced :# :acteria. &e animals and t&eir 'roducts

t&at &umans collec%el# eat are %eganE and get t&eir 4, from &a%ing access to t&is :acteriaE w&ic& is

found in nutrient2dense soils and also feces. 4, is also said to :e 'roduced in small Ruanes in t&e gut

and e%en t&e mout&E &owe%er t&e e%idence currentl# s&ows it;s not readil# a:sor:ed into our

:loodstreamE so we must get it from an outside source.

If we li%ed like animals in nature w&o eat dirt and fecesE t&en it would :e 're# eas# to get our 4,

wit&out animal 'roducts. Howe%erE we li%e in a sterile societ# w&ere we was& e%er#t&ing S our &andsE

:odiesE roomsE foodE and morewit& an:acterial soa's and saniers. Man# 'eo'le &a%e 'oor

diges%e &ealt&E as wellE w&ic& makes it diXcult to su''ort good :acterial growt& in t&e colon. 3ince

most of us are disgusted :# t&e idea of eang dirt and fecesE it;s great t&at 4, su''lements are now

a%aila:le. It is recommended to onl# :u# su''lements if #our :lood tests re'ort a de>cienc#E &owe%erE

since most of us indirectl# consume 4, t&roug& for>ed foods and don;t want to waste mone#. 4,

stores tend to take t&ree #ears or e%en decades to de'lete. "%er#one s&ould get t&eir le%els c&ecked

e%er# few #ears to know t&em for certain and get a su''lement if t&e# are low.

4, is a widel# used su''lement :ecause it is a common de>cienc#E not one t&at eCects onl# %egans.

Man# &ea%# animal es& and 'roduct eaters &a%e low le%els of 4, :ecause most indi%iduals &a%e

trou:le assimilang or aaining 4,. o remed# t&isE science and tec&nolog# &a%e created 4,

su''lements in 'ill formE inOeconsE and food. &e 'lant2:ased eater and %egan will &a%e no trou:le

o:taining 4, in a cruelt#2free form. &e :est wa# to su''lement is su:linguall#E :ecause we a:sor:

~ 72 ~



nutrients :eer if t&e#;re inOected directl# into our :loodstream com'ared to our diges%e s#stem. "%en

most animals in factor# farms are su''lemented wit& 4, t&roug& inOeconE 'artl# :ecause t&e# are

eang an unnatural grain2:ased diet. ?8_ of t&e 4, manufactured is actuall# used on farm animals. It;s

suggested t&at all &umans su''lement wit& 4,E no maer &ow well #ou eat. As a %eganE #ou can get all

t&e 4, #ou need in a cruelt#2free form. W&en :u#ing 4,E make sure to :u# met&#lco:alamin. It is

more e='ensi%eE :ut its s#nt&ec counter'art is deri%ed from c#anideE w&ic& is :ot& dangerous and

ineCec%e. 4, is im'ortant for #our &ealt& and regular :odil# funconsE including- 'ro'er circulaonE

cell formaonE ner%ous s#stem funconE and mental &ealt&.

Corruption in the -utritional Arena

If we;re :eing real wit& oursel%esE we realie t&at corru'on can e=ist in an# arena or focus of industr#.

W&et&er it;s &istor#E s'iritualit#E educaonE or medicine and nutrion. Man# industries &ide t&eir

dece'on under t&e guise of w&at is acce'ted as Gscience. 4ut e%en Gscience can :e corru'ted and

fueled :# greedE 'owerE and control. Mone# is t#'icall# t&e mo%ang factor and mind control is t&e

tool. &e Gscience in an# cor'orate industr# is almost alwa#s funded :# %ested interests. Pertaining tonutrionE t&e meat and dair# industr# are :ig funding cor'orate enes for Gscien>c researc& on

nutrion. oda#E most '&armaceucal studies are funded :# t&e drug com'an#E and if t&e results of t&e

stud# are not fa%ora:le t&en t&e# do not 'u:lis& it. "ssenall#E t&e funding ent# su''l#ing t&e fundsE

suc& as grants for researc&E &a%e t&e a:ilit# to mani'ulate t&e e='eriments t&roug& reduconist

met&ods and outcomes in a wa# t&e# see >t to su''ort t&eir own agenda.

!r. . +olin +am':ell talks a:out t&e corru'on of nutrion e=tensi%el# in &is :ook GW&ole. &e 5nited

3tates !e'artment of Agriculture )53!A* is a go%ernment funded agenc# w&ic& claims to :e one of t&e

&ig&est nutrional aut&ories. &e go%ernment &as a %ested interest in making mone# and t&ink can :e

done :# controlling t&e 'eo'le. A control s#stem cannot 'ro%ide muc& correct or e%ol%ing informaon ifit wants to control t&e 'eo'le. A go%ernment must s'read as muc& misinformaon as 'ossi:leE wit&out

seeming :latantl# discredita:leE to mani'ulate and control minds. &ereforeE t&e go%ernment funds

muc& of t&e researc& and o'eraons of animal agricultureE and t&e meat and dair# industries &a%e g&t

monetar# es wit& go%ernment. &ese industries su''ort candidates running for oXceE and in return

recei%e ta= and su:sid# mone#E all at t&e e='ense of t&e ciens of go%ernment. Policians are

cons'iring wit& cor'orate interests for a collec%e goal of control. &e American go%ernment alone

s'ends :illion eac& #ear to su:sidie t&e meat and dair# industries. 0ut of t&atE 8.81_ of t&at mone#

went to su:sidie fruit and %egeta:les. &ere are also &idden costs associated wit& 'roducing animal

food. How does 1,1 :illion a #ear sound( &is num:er results from t&e :ills of su:sidiesE &ealt& care

costsE en%ironmental damageE and ot&er costl# ac%ies associated wit& 'roducing and consuminganimal 'roducts. <enerall#E if #ou want to follow t&e corru'onE follow t&e mone#.

3upport from -utritional BAuthorities

~ 73 ~



recommended :# t&eir '&#sician. 5nfortunatel#E @aiser Permanente found t&at man# '&#sicians are

&esitant to suggest suc& diets to 'aentsE 'ossi:l# due to t&eir lack of educaon on suc& met&ods of

treatment. &ereforeE t&e re'ort included 'aent educaon materials to &el' make 'lant2:ased diets

t&e [new normal.

Impacts of &he Animal Agriculture Industry: 4uman and Environmental

&e World Healt& 0rganiaon also released anot&er im'ortant statement arguing against t&e

sustaina:ilit# of animal agriculture-

“Although two-thirds of the world's populaon depends on cereal or tuber-based diets, the other one-

third consumes signicant amounts of animal food products. The la(er group places an undue demand

on land, water, and other resources re$uired for intensive food producon, which ma)es the typical

%estern diet not only undesirable from the standpoint of health but also environmentally unsustainable.

"f we balance energy inta)e with the e*penditure re$uired for basal metabolism, physical acvity,

growth, and repair, we will nd that the dietary $uality re$uired for health is essenally the same across populaon groups.!

#ater? Land? ' Air

Water is an essenal resource for all li%ing t&ings. According to t&e G+alifornia "ducaon 9oundaonE it

takes o%er E188 gallons of water to 'roduce e%er# 'ound of +alifornia :eef. +om'aring t&at amount of

water consum'on to s&oweringE it would take 6 mont&s of a%erage s&owering to use t&e eRui%alent

amount of water used to 'roduce one 'ound of :eef. 9or a food com'arisonE it takes D gallons to growone 'ound of w&eat. &e li%estock sector accounts for o%er 'ercent of glo:al water use. 0ur fres&

water reser%es are Ruickl# de'lengE and water is likel# to :e t&e ne=t resource S like oil S 'eo'le will go

to war o%er if trends connue. Muc& of our fres& water and oceans are also :eing 'olluted :# runoC

from li%estock facilies suc& as con>ned animal feeding o'eraons )+A90s*E colloRuiall# known as

Gfactor# farms.

A re'ort :# t&e 9ood and Agriculture 0rganiaon of t&e 5nited Naons )9A0* on t&e en%ironmental

im'act on animal agriculture states- GIt is 'ro:a:l# t&e largest sectoral source of water 'olluonE

contri:ung to eutro'&icaonE Gdead ones in coastal areasE degradaon of coral reefsE &uman &ealt&

'ro:lemsE emergence of an:ioc resistance and man# ot&ers.

&is water 'olluon comes from animal wasteE &ormonesE 'escidesE ferliers )'arcularl# nitrogenE

and '&os'&orous*E and ot&er &armful su:stances. &e same 'ollutants t&at go into t&e water end t&e air

t&roug& t&e &#drogen c#cleE and also 'ollute t&e soilE making t&e land less ara:le. &e li%estock sector is

also t&e largest user of land. &e 'roducon of li%estock accounts for 78 'ercent of all agricultural land

useE and co%ers 8 'ercent of t&e eart&;s land surface. 78 'ercent of once forested land in t&e Amaon is

now occu'ied :# 'asturesE and t&e remainder is largel# co%ered :# cro's to feed li%estock. 0%ergraing is

~ 75 ~



also degrading t&e land.

&e micro:ial deconstrucon of organic car:on and nitrogen com'ounds in manure contri:ute to foul

odors and issues of air 'olluon in surrounding areas and t&e "art&;s atmos'&ereE w&ic& 'romotes

climate c&ange. !uring decom'osionE no=ious le%els of gases are emied t&at can lead to acute and

c&ronic illness. Animal agriculture is res'onsi:le for , 'ercent of green&ouse gas emissions measured in

car:on dio=ide eRui%alentsE w&ic& is &ig&er t&an emissions from all trans'ortaon com:ined. &e

li%estock sector emits 7 'ercent of ant&ro'ogenic met&ane. Ant&ro'ogenic means it originates from&uman ac%it#. Met&ane &a''ens to :e mes more 'owerful in glo:al warming 'otenal t&an +0

deri%ed from fermentaon :# ruminants. &e li%estock sector also emits 6D 'ercent of ant&ro'ogenic

nitrous o=ideE wit& ?6 mes more glo:al warming 'otenal t&an +0. Animal agriculture is also

res'onsi:le for nearl# t&e same 'ercentage of ant&ro'ogenic ammonia emissions wit& ammonia

contri:ung signi>cantl# to t&e acidi>caon of ecos#stems and acid rain. "ang %egan would :e :eer

t&an swa''ing a regular all gas o'erang car for a &#:rid. "ang a %egan diet reduces emissions :# 7

mes more t&an eang ,88_ locall# grown. And o%erallE eang a %egan diet reduces emissions :# 7_

more t&an a con%enonal diet of meatE eggsE and dair#. "%en more emissions are reduced w&en eang

organic and locall# grownE :ut of course t&ere are limitaons to t&e a%aila:ilit# of aaining ,88_ organic

and locall# grown 'roduce. &ere are no 'ro:lems aaining con%enonal 'lant2:ased food an#w&eret&oug&.

4uman 3tarvation

Adding to t&e list of nega%es conseRuences from animal agricultureE and consuming animals and

'roducts from t&eir :odiesE is anot&er atrocit#. Human star%aon and glo:al suCering results from t&ese

'racces in t&e Western world. A stud# 'roduced :# +ornell 5ni%ersit# found t&at t&e 5nited 3tates

alone could feed 88 million 'eo'le wit& t&e grain t&at it feeds to li%estock annuall#. It takes :etween 72

, 'ounds of grain to 'roduce a single pound of :eef. &is amount of grain could feed mul'le families.

2rass.ed )eef

&ere;s an idea oang around t&at grass2fed :eef will sa%e t&e da#. W&en we look at t&e o:Oec%e factsE

&owe%erE we >nd t&is 'ro'osion is not 'ossi:le. Pro'onents of grass2fed cows 'osit t&at it;s a more

sustaina:le 'racceE #et it reRuires at least .D acres of 'asture to raise a single grass2fed cow. &e

5nited 3tates alone contains ?1.D million cale. If #ou do t&e mat& and mul'l# t&at num:er :# .Dacres 'er cowE it comes to a''ro=imatel# D8 million acres of land needed for graing 'astures. &at;s

o%er ?8E888 sRuare milesE w&ic& is more t&an ,8_ of all land in America. 4ecause t&e 'lanet is so largeE

It ma# seem like t&ere is enoug& land to do t&is iniall#E :ut let;s consider t&e facts. &e Amaon

rainforest is alread# :eing deforested at an alarming rate for t&e 'lanng of animal feed cro's and t&e

creaon of grass2fed ranges for organicall#2reared cows to grae. If we were to raise cale on Gmarginal

landE w&ic& is land t&at cannot :e used to grow ot&er cro'sE it sll doesn;t add u'. &ese lands are not

~ 76 ~



ferle enoug& to 'roduce t&e grass needed to raise a cow on .D acres alone. &e acreage reRuired is

esmated to increase to D acres 'er cowE w&ic& would reRuire .D :illion acres or D.D million sRuare

miles of marginal land. &is would :e more t&an t&e enre area of t&e 5nited 3tates. &is infeasi:le

'ro'osion is not a soluon to t&e 'ro:lem.

Pro:lems wit& t&e dis'lacement of 'redators and ot&er wildlife also comes into 'la#. &ese 'astures

would disru't ecos#stems and lead to t&e deat& of man# s'ecies. &e resources reRuired to 'rotect

li%estock from 'redators would :e enormous. We would &a%e to de%ise a wa# to feed t&e li%estockduring droug&ts and in t&e winter. AlsoE since grass2fed cows grow muc& more slowl#E t&e# must li%e

longer to reac& a suXcient sie for slaug&ter. 0%er t&eir lifemeE t&e# emit muc& more met&ane and

nitrous2o=ide com'ared to feedlot caleE resulng in D8_ more green&ouse gases.

&he 3olution

+onsuming grass2fed and free range animals 'roducts is not a sustaina:le 'racce for a maOorit#E or e%en

a sia:le minorit#E of t&e 'o'ulaon. 9actor# farming is necessar# to su''l# t&e world;s demand for meatand ot&er animal 'roducts. &e soluon isn;t transioning to grass2fed met&ods. &e soluon is

eliminang all animal 'roducts from #our diet. If we :egin t&is 'rocessE t&en t&e animals and star%ing

&umans and eart& will :e e='onenall# :eer oC. <rowing u' in an indi%idualisc cultureE we oQen feel

t&at one 'erson cannot create meaningful c&angeE :ut t&is is untrue. You can start a wonderful c&ain of

e%ents Oust :# li%ing a &ealt&# lifest#leE :eing a good inuenceE and leading :# e=am'le

~ 77 ~



Chapter : A Diet to Enhance Progress

o look at t&is Rueson from a )w*&olisc 'ers'ec%eE we must consider uni%ersal law. According to G&e

Law of MentalismE e%er#t&ing was designed for a 'ur'ose and a reasonE :ecause all of realit# is a

mental construct. &e source of creaon and intelligence also e='resses itself in &ow t&e &uman :od#

was designed and our o'mal diet. &e &uman :od# was designed for a s'eci>c 'ur'ose like e%er#t&ing

else t&at e=istsE so it makes 'erfect sense t&at t&ere is a s'ecies s'eci>c diet for t&e &uman s'eciesE Oustas t&ere is for an# ot&er animal. &e :est diet for us to eat is t&at w&ic& would :est su''ort our &ealt&.

Healt& comes from li%ing in alignment wit& w&at our :odies are designed to :e in &armon# wit&E or w&at

is natural. 0ur s'ecies s'eci>c diet is a Gw&ole foodsE 'lant2:ased diet.

3pecies 3peci6ic Diet

&is is 'ro:a:l# t&e most contro%ersial to'ic of t&is :ookE and understanda:l# so. An e=tremel# old and

ingrained 'aradigm is going to :e dismantled in t&is 'oron of t&e :ook. &is c&a'ter ad%ocates againstt&e consum'on of animals and animal 'roducts. I sa# t&is wit& t&e trust t&at if #ou &a%e read t&is farE

#ou will &a%e an o'en mind and :e a:le to see t&is informaon for w&at it is.

W&en #ou look in natureE eac& s'ecies eats a 'arcular diet. Mem:ers of t&at s'ecies eat t&e same

t&ing. &e male lion doesnJt eat diCerent food t&an t&e female lion t&e leader of t&e 'ack doesnJt eat

diCerent food t&an t&e rest of t&e 'ack one 'ack doesnJt eat diCerent food t&an anot&er 'ack li%ing

t&ousands of kilometers awa#. &e onl# me a mem:er of one s'ecies eats diCerent from t&e rest is

during t&e new:orn stageE w&en most mammals consume milk from t&eir mot&er. AQer t&e# &a%e grown

enoug& from t&e nutrients 'acked inside and can eat solid foodE t&e# eat t&e same food as t&eir kin. ItJs

common knowledge t&at all animals of a select s'ecies eat t&e same diet. WeE as a s'eciesE s&ould :e no

diCerent. We s&ould at least acknowledge t&at we &a%e no need for dietar# di%ersit#E e=ce't in sur%i%al

situaons. As &umansE we &a%e man# diCerent diets :ecause we li%e all o%er t&e worldE w&ere diCerent

foods grow and diCerent cultures take root. We &a%e a tendenc# to categorie e%er#t&ingE including

&uman :eings. &ere is a s'eci>c diet for a certain religionE raceE se=E dos&a t#'eE and so on. We &a%e

created man# erroneous diets suc& as t&e :lood t#'e dietE Atkins dietE 3out& 4eac& dietE and Paleo or

Primal diet. All of t&ese diets fail to 'romote sustaina:ilit#E %italit#E longe%it#E and )w*&olisc &ealt&.

Humans are :i'edal creaturesE meaning we walk on two lim:s. &is fact a:out &uman '&#siolog# does

not su''ort t&e catc&ing of 're# in our natural state. &e a:ilit# for a &uman to catc& a dogE for e=am'leE

is %er# slim. 0ur locomoon does not su''ort t&e ca'a:ilit# to eXcientl# c&ase 're#E w&ic& reRuires

running %er# fast. If we some&ow miraculousl# catc& t&is 're#E t&en killing it would :e an intense

struggle and %irtuall# im'ossi:le. We donJt &a%e t&e s&ar' claws or teet& t&at are designed to eXcientl#

kill an animal like a real carni%ore or omni%ore does. &e# ri' into t&e furE skinE and es& wit& t&eir teet&

and use t&eir claws to tear t&roug& musclesE tendonsE and :ones. A real carni%ore or omni%ore will eat

all t&e 'arts of t&e animalE not Oust t&e es&E and t&e# don;t drain it of :lood :efore&and. If we got into

t&e animal :# using a knife or working at it for an a:surd amount of meE t&en we would :e disgusted :#

t&e raw carcass. "%en :efore geZng to t&e cor'seE :ing t&roug& t&e fur and skin is not a''eingE and

~ 78 ~



would sicken an# sane &uman :eing. &is reason alone s&ould inform us t&at we are not real omni%ores

or carni%ores. If we wereE we could eCec%el# catc&E killE o'en and eat raw animal carcasses wit& relis&E

and wit& t&e natural :od# we were :orn into as our onl# tool.

W&en we see animalsE we do not &a%e t&e insnct to c&ase t&em down and kill t&em for food. Animals

donJt look tast# in t&eir li%e state like t&e# do to carni%ores and omni%ores. It is onl# cooked and

seasoned animal es& t&at is a''eing most &umans. We are not natural creatures of %iolenceE :ut

'eaceful creatures. We &a%e c&osen to o:tain food t&roug& unnecessar# slaug&terE :ut most of us

wouldn;t :e willing or wanng to engage in t&e killing oursel%es. Most of us are >lled wit& a sense of

a''reciaon w&en we see an animalE and feel inclined to s&ow friends&i' and lo%e towards t&emE as we

do wit& our 'ets. We s&ould look to t&ese feelingsE rat&er t&an social condioningE w&en we consider

our dietar# c&oices. We s&ould also look to our anatom# and '&#siolog# to redisco%er our natural diet.

(ur .rugivorous <elatives

&e :eings we most resem:le in t&e animal kingdom are 'rimates. &e# &a%e &ands of t&e same natureE

w&ic& are 'erfect for 'icking fruitE and t&e# use t&ese t&em to do so. Primates are frugi%orous animalsE

and t&ere is amounng e%idence t&at we ma# :e frugi%ores too. Let us com'are. +arni%orousE

omni%orousE and &er:i%orous creatures all &a%e eit&er 'aws or &oo%es. &is is so t&e# can run to catc&

're# or outrun 'redators. 0mni%ores and carni%ores must :e a:le to run fast enoug& to catc& an animal

and use its 'aws to &el' kill and eat it. Her:i%ores must :e a:le to run long enoug& to esca'e t&eir

aacker and t&eir &oo%es are well2made for graing on %egetaon. &is is not t&e onl# anatomical

diCerence :etween us. 0ur diges%e track is not designed to su''ort t&e consum'on of animal es&.

0ur stomac& acid is not nearl# as acidic as an omni%ore or carni%ore to neutralie 'at&ogensE and t&e

carcass tends to rot in t&e colonE causing all sorts of maladies. &is is w&ere diges%e diseases like

di%erculis and t&e infamous colon cancer originates. All carni%ores and omni%ores &a%e s&ort diges%e

tracts w&ic& eliminate t&e to=ic es& Ruickl# so it does not :ecome a maOor &indrance to t&e :od#. 0ur

diges%e tract is long like t&at of &er:i%orous and frugi%orous animals so it can 'ro'erl# digest all t&e

>:er and eXcientl# e=tract all t&e nutrients. We also &a%e :i'edalism and amaingl# de=terous &ands to

walk u' to a 'lant or e%en clim: a fruit tree and 'ick some food.

+ontrar# to 'o'ular :eliefE &umans arenJt omni%orous or e%en 'urel# &er:i%orous creatures. We are

mainl# fruit eaters. 9ruit &as 'la#ed a :ig role in t&e diet of t&e &uman s'eciesE as it &as wit& 'rimatesE

and s&ould connue to do so. It is dangerous to ignore t&at animals &a%e s'ecies; s'eci>c diets. &is is

not to sa# t&at fruit is all we s&ould eatE :ut it s&ould consist of t&e maOorit# of our caloric intake. 9ruit

%isuall# aracts us wit& its :eauful colors and t&e fragrance is almost alwa#s in%ing. It;s called t&e

:otan# of desireE and it;s w&# some 'eo'le dedicate t&eir li%es to :eing fruit &unters. We &a%e ada'ted

to see diCerent s&ades of green and man# colors to &el' tell w&en fruit is ri'e. W&en itJs %er# ri'eE it falls

from t&e tree to :e eaten fruit can tell us it;s read# :# literall# &iZng us on t&e &ead. 9ruit is solar

energ# en%elo'ed in sweetness. &ere was a reason t&e tree of knowledge in t&e <arden of "den was a

fruit tree. 9ruit is calling to :e eaten :ecause its seeds want to :e s'read.

~ 79 ~



*niversal Law and 3uffering

&e secon a:o%e talks mostl# a:out anatomical and 's#c&ological e%idence t&at s&ows &umans are

more frugi%orous t&an omni%orousE :ut t&is secon will mainl# address t&e nega%es of indulging in an

animal2:ased diet. &e Law of i:raon or Law of Aracon is t&e :asis for t&is e='lanaon.

Animal es& is of a %er# low %i:raon. Animal 'roducts are of an e=tremel# dense form of maerE wit&

low %i:raonal energies t&at es'eciall# reside in t&e es& aQer t&e animal is killed. W&en we eat meatE itfeels '&#sicall# &ea%# :ecause of its material densit#E :ut it is also emoonall#E s'irituall#E and

energecall# &ea%#. Animal 'roducts not onl# weig& us down on a '&#sical le%elE :ut also on an

emoonal and s'iritual le%el. We assume :urdens on all le%els of e=istence aQer indulgence in animal

'roducts. &is is t&e Law of +orres'ondence.

&e nega%e energ# is ingrained into t&e animal t&roug&out its life if it Js raised in a state of distress and

alwa#s :efore itJs killed. "moons suc& as fearE 'ainE deat&E and suCering :ecome a 'art of t&e animal

w&en it e='eriences t&ese emoons. 3uc& nega%e or low emoons :ecomes t&e energ# or aura of t&e

slaug&tered animal;s es&. &ereforeE w&en we eat meatE we are also eang fearE 'ainE deat&E and

suCering.

&e Law of +ause and "CectE or t&e Law of @armaE states t&at e%er# acon #ields a reacon. No acon

goes wit&out a reacon. "%er# acon creates an eCectE w&et&er 'osi%e or nega%e. W&en we feed

oursel%es :ased u'on anot&er animalJs needless suCeringE t&e nega%e eCect of t&at :ecomes

su:stanal. We can see it in t&e &ealt& of 'eo'le w&om freRuentl# ingest large amounts of animal

'roducts. &e naons wit& t&e &ig&est rates of animal 'roduct consum'on e='erience t&e &ig&est rates

of degenera%e disease. W&at we >nd is t&at diseases of abuence )middle to u''er class* result from

t&e western dietE w&ic& contains su:stanal amounts of meatE dair#E and eggs.

&he 3ym0iotic <elationship of Plants and 4umans

Plants are &ere for t&e &uman s'ecies to eatE w&et&er in t&e form of fruits or %egeta:les. Plant foods

grow from Mot&er "art& and cannot &arm t&e &uman :od#E e=cluding some 'oisonous 'lantsE of course.

Plants are t&e source of energ# and nutrion for e%er#one on t&is 'lanet. &e# are t&e foundaon of

e%er# food c&ain :ecause t&e# are w&ere solar energ# is stored. Most &umans eat animals t&at are

&er:i%oresE w&o get t&eir sustenance from t&e 'lants t&at t&e# consume. It makes no sense to consume

a secondar# source w&en we can consume t&e 'rimar# source of energ# directl#. W&# >lter nutrients

w&en it is ineXcient( Plants grow from t&e "art& for t&e well2:eing of allE w&ic& is 'redicated u'on

reason. If we were not to :ene>t as a s'ecies from t&e nouris&ment of 'lants t&en fruits and %egeta:les

wouldnJt grow &ere. It is erroneous to t&ink t&at all t&e fruit trees are &ere for monke#s alone. 3ome areE

of courseE :ut t&is 'lanet and t&e uni%erse oCers us a :eauful :ount# of energ# in t&e form of 'lants.

Man# &umans t&at consume meat feel Ous>ed :ecause t&e# argue eang 'lants is eRuall# &armful or

immoral. &is is clearl# false :ecause of t&e 'rinci'le of necessit#. 3omet&ing is immoral w&en a less

&armful c&oice can :e made :ut is ignored. A lion eang ot&er animals is not immoral :ecause t&is is &is

carni%orous nature and &e &as no ot&er c&oice. Howe%erE &umans can sustain t&emsel%es and t&ri%e oC

~ 80 ~



'lants alone. No suCering comes to t&e 'lant. It is ad%ocated to sll s&ow t&anks to #our food :efore

consuming it :ecause t&e sun and soil of Mot&er Nature &as 'ro%ided us wit& &er energ#E :ut no

Ous>caon is necessar# for t&is natural act. +on%ersel#E t&ere can :e no true Ous>caon for t&e

connued consum'on of animal 'roductsE :ecause t&ere is no moralit# in &a%ing an animal slaug&tered

for t&e sasfacon of our taste :uds. 0ur sole 'ur'ose for consuming food is energ# and nutrion.

Plants do not contain a central ner%ous s#stemE meaning t&at t&e# &a%e no wa# to 'rocess or Gfeel

'&#sical 'ain. Ha%ing to eat 'lants for food is in no wa# com'ara:le to eang animals for food.

3omemes we Gkill a 'lant to consume itE suc& as carrots. YetE com'ared to killing a cowE t&e e='erience

is com'letel# diCerent. W&en a cow is a:out to :e killed #ou can sense &er fearE &ear &er cries for &el'E

&ear &er moans of 'ainE and see t&e emoon of sadness and suCering in &er face. 5suall# t&e &ead is &it

or 'unctured to stun t&e :rain :efore &er t&roat is slit as &er &eart 'um's out a large amount of :lood.

W&en s&e >nall# diesE #ou can feel and smell deat& in t&e air. &e killing of an animal is suc& a :ar:aric

and %iolent act t&at not&ing 'osi%e is felt out of it :# a sane 'erson. W&en we Gkill celer#E we

e='erience no %iolence or nega%e emoons. &at s&ould tell us somet&ing. +onsuming 'lants as food is

not&ing more t&an a 'osi%e energ# e=c&ange. It was a contract t&at we made wit& t&e 'lanet 'rior to

incarnang &ere. We are &ere for t&e 'lanet and t&e 'lanet is &ere for us. We do not %iolate 'lants :#

eang t&emE :ut we do %iolate t&e free will of a senent animal to li%e :# taking its life needlessl#E and

co2o'ng t&em for food t&at we were not designed to eat.

Plants donJt e='erience emoons :ecause t&e# are not senent. Plants are ali%e :ut t&e# are a diCerent

class of :eings. &e 'lant is a :eing t&at s&ares a consciousness more directl# linked wit& t&e 'lanet as a

w&ole. 0ne can understand t&is :# sim'l# realiing t&at 'lants grow from t&e "art&. Plants are a 'art of

Mot&er "art& and are sll growing from &er. It is t&is realiaon w&ic& se'arates life in t&e 'lant kingdom

from t&at of t&e animal kingdom. &e word Ganimal comes from t&e Lan word animaE w&ic& means

GsoulE or an indi%iduated e='ression. Animals donJt grow from t&e "art& t&e# roam t&e "art& and are

indi%iduated from t&e "art&;s consciousnessE also known as <aia. &e "art& a:sor:s t&e energ# of t&e

sun and 'ro%ides our sustenance it is not animals t&at are &ere for t&e 'ur'ose of &uman nutrion.

Animals are certainl# &ere for t&eir own 'ur'oses and not to :e used :# &umansE neit&er for diet or an#

ot&er means. &is is w&at t&e %egan lifest#le is all a:out.

#hat is ;eganism

eganism is a lifest#le t&at reOects t&e e='loitaon of animals for &uman 'ur'oses suc& as consum'onE

clot&ingE tesng )medicalE cosmecE etc.*E and entertainment. Acons t&at :ring &arm and t&eQ to

anot&er senent :eing are not a 'art of t&e %egan lifest#le. &ereforeE %egans do not consume animal

es& or 'roductsE nor do t&e# wear animal skins or use 'roducts tested on animals. &is :ook ad%ocatest&e %egan lifest#le w&ole&eartedl# :ecause it is t&e onl# wa# to li%e in &armon# wit& nature and t&e

trut&. 0n to' of :eing cruelt#2freeE t&e diet of a %eganE usuall# called a G%egan diet or G'lant2:ased

dietE can :e %er# &ealt&# in contrast to a standard American diet. &e nega%e re'ercussions of

consuming animalsE :ot& on a s'iritual le%el and for &uman &ealt&E is not to :e taken lig&tl#. eganism is

a manifestaon of our natural diet wit& a moral or et&ical focusE :ut it is also muc& more t&an a diet.

~ 81 ~



A 4CL. Plant0ased Lifestyle

A wa# of eang is oQen referred to as a diet. Howe%erE most diets are deat&2st#les :ecause t&e# are

unsustaina:le. "ang a &ig&2car:E low2fatE 'lant2:ased Gdiet is essenall# a Glifest#le :ecause it;s

sustaina:le. We all &a%e &eard of t&e #o2#o diets out t&ereE like Weig&t Watc&ers and AtkinsE and t&e

trut& is t&at all diets are :asicall# #o2#o diets. W&en t&e word lifest#le comes to mindE it s&ould trigger a

%ision of %italit#E %i:ranc#E energ#E and o%erall &ealt&. It cannot feel restric%e or :e unaCorda:le. It &as

to mes& wit& #our 'ersonal %alues and social lifeE as well. If a diet lea%es #ou &ungr#E faguedE or'enniless t&en it can ne%er :e a long2lasng lifest#le. 9or man# centuries car:o&#drates &a%e :een a

dietar# sta'le for &umans. oda#E t&e &ig&2car: low2fat %egan lifest#le is gaining 'o'ularit# as it 'ro%es to

:e t&e most sustaina:le wa# of eang to 're%ent disease and maintain a &ealt&# weig&t.

Calories

Man# 'eo'le t&at read t&is :ook alread# know t&e im'ortance of calories. &is is :ecause most readers

likel# use t&eir leQ2:rain to &el' understand issues using more logical and scien>c reasoning. Howe%erE

some 'eo'le w&o are im:alanced or rig&t2:rain dominant ma# not see t&e im'ortance of calories Oust

#et. o understand t&e im'ortance of caloriesE one needs to :e :alanced in t&eir state of mind and also

willing to res'ect t&e material as'ect of our e=istence. We are s'iritual :eings Gcurrentl# &a%ing a

G'&#sical e='erience. 4# Gwe I mean t&e &uman animal or our '&#sical %e&icle. If #ou are reading t&is

:ook rig&t nowE t&en #our consciousness is in t&e ! world. Not to sa# #ou donJt simultaneousl# e=ist in

diCerent realmsE :ut #ou &a%e a :od# t&at e=ists &ere in t&e es&. &e s'irit is in>niteE w&ic& is t&e GIE

:ut t&e Gme as'ect of #ou refers to t&e :od#. &is is a %e&icle t&at must :e &onored and t&is is w&at is

:eing em'&asied w&en referring to understanding t&e im'ortance of calories.

&e material :od# needs caloriesE :ecause it 'ro%ides fuel for our :odil# funcons. IfE one da#E our

:odies :ecome lig&ter in densit# S literall# :ecoming a less dense form of maer S t&en ma#:e we canconsider doing awa# wit& t&e old 'aradigm of '&#sical food and onl# focus u'on t&e new energ# source

t&at we would use to sustain our new :od#. If t&e :od# e%en needed e=ternal sustenance for energ# at

t&at 'oint. It is :elie%ed wit&in man# sc&ools of t&oug&t t&at we were once :eings t&at did not need to

eat '&#sical food. We sustained oC of solar energ#E and energ# manifested from t&e uni%ersal et&er.

3tories of t&e original man :eing green will 'oint to some esoteric knowledge 'ertaining to our energ#

sourceE suc& as solar energ# :eing all t&at we needed to t&ri%e. Like 'lantsE ma#:e c&loro'&#ll was

running t&roug& our %eins. It is o:%ious and agreed u'on t&at &umanit# :egan not as material :eingsE

:ut as immaterial :eings. &e immaterial alwa#s 'recedes t&e materialE t&is is t&e Law of Mentalism.

Howe%erE we &a%e fallen into t&e material world. It is suggested t&at we ma# return and e%ol%e as :eings

to a &ig&er densit#E w&et&er it :e t&roug& deat& or e%oluon. &is is t&e law of r&#t&m.

4utE unl t&at da# comesE we must li%e in t&e GnowE and engage in eang t&e correct amount of calories

from '&#sical w&ole foods. A cater'illar must grow wings :efore it can #. "%ol%ing must &a''en >rst

not t&e ot&er wa# around. &e same conce't a''lies to t&e walking in front of a train analog#. An#t&ing

is 'ossi:leE :ut it;s not intelligent to test #our a:ilit# to not to :e killed :# a train :# walking out in front

of it :ased onl# u'on a :elief t&at #ou can sur%i%e it wit&out an# e%idence >rst. "%idence would :e :eing

a:le to walk t&roug& a wallE for e=am'le. If one &as done no suc& t&ingE t&en it;s is ridiculous to see if

~ 82 ~



#our &uman :od# can 'ass t&roug& a train wit&out :eing &armed. We sll need logic to 'ro'erl#

funcon.

Kust as #ou would need e%idence to see if #ou can 'ass t&roug& a train un&armed :efore tr#ing itE we

would need e%idence to see if we could sur%i%e wit&out food for drasc 'eriods of meE or t&e rest of

our li%es in good &ealt&. A few >gures in t&e s'iritual communit# are s'reading misinformaon u'on

diet. 3ome sa# t&at eang lessE or not at allE will make us more s'iritual. 0t&ers sa# t&at fasngE

liRuidarianismE and :reat&arianism s&ould :e 'racced regularl# to :ecome elite in t&e s'iritual realm. Itis foll# to t&ink t&at :# not eangE we :ecome more s'irituall# elite. &e reason w&# I em'&asie t&is is

:ecause suc& claims are misleading and dangerous to trut& seekers on t&e Ruest for knowledge.

Alt&oug&E it can :e considered t&at we are t&e most s'iritual w&en we dieE I am sure no one reading t&is

:ook is tr#ing to die fastE and t&ese s'iritual star%aon tri's mig&t inad%ertentl# get #ou t&ere. It

consider we;re t&e most s'iritual w&en we ful>ll our 'ur'ose &ere on eart&. o do t&is we need t&e

energ# to manifest our 'ur'ose :# fueling our %e&icles$:iological mac&ines wit& food. &e &uman

Gmaterial :od# needs a calorie source in t&e form of '&#sical food to sustain itselfE Oust a gasoline

'owered car needs gasoline to run. 0ur :od# is designed to :e a:le to e=tract energ# from food S t&is is

realied w&en we look at our &uman :iolog#. Kust as a gasoline car can;t run oC electricit# :ecause it

lacks t&e internal wiringE t&e &uman :od# can;t run oC :reat& or sun along :ecause its designed to run

oC glucose. If we could sur%i%e oC :reat& or sunlig&t alone t&en we would not &a%e teet&E an eso'&agusE

intesnesE an anusE or uret&ra. 0ur w&ole diges%e and waste eliminaon s#stems would :e t&ere for no

reason.

&e &uman :od# cannot draw energ# from sun2gaing or :reat&arianism. &ese 'racces will gi%e #ou

mindfulness t&roug& 'racce and addional s'iritual energ# t&roug& intenonE :ut t&e# do lile for t&e

material :od#. If t&ese 'racces were sustaina:leE t&en a man would :e a:le to run countless marat&ons

consistentl# wit&out t&e :od# :reaking down. &is is not t&e case :eing t&at t&e :od# will e%entuall#

gi%e out wit&out t&e 'ro'er calories and nouris&ment. &e :od# is a mac&ine and a :east t&at must :efed to funcon. Kust like gas must :e 'ut in a car for it to run and tra%el distances. +alories translate to

t&e gas for our %e&icleE and it is :est to :e o:Oec%e a:out t&is as not to lose our minds and our :od#.

3omemes it ma# seem like a c&ore to constantl# &a%e food on our mindsE :ut it is a task t&at we must

engage in :eing in t&is world. We are &ere and we &a%e to res'ect t&e laws of t&e '&#sical realm. W&en

we dieE or transion out of t&e '&#sical :od#E t&en we will no longer &a%e to worr# a:out calories. 4ut

unl t&enE w&# not enOo# solar energ# 'ackaged into sweetness as fruit(

Animals in nature eit&er eat constantl# or eat :ig w&en t&e# get a c&ance. &ere is no restricon in

nature. Humanit# &as de%iated so far from natureE t&at our collec%e diet &as :ecome one of t&e t&ings

&olding us :ack. We;%e created unnatural 'rocessed foodsE co2o'ted animal 'roducts as &uman foodsEand erroneousl# t&ink a diet too &ig& in car:o&#drate is un&ealt&#. It;s 'ossi:le to o%ereat on t&is

unnatural dietE :ut it;s '&#sicall# and anatomicall# im'ossi:le to o%ereat on natural &ig&2car:E w&ole

'lant foods.

+alorie restriconE fasng and :reat&arianism are not necessar# to reac& a &ig&er form of s'iritual

enlig&tenmentE and are destruc%e 'racces. +alorie restricng and fasng results in meta:olic damage

and can cause our :eauful :iological mac&ineE called t&e &uman :od#E to store food as fat unl we can

~ 83 ~



&eal. AQer a fast t&e :od# t&inks it ma# e='erience famine againE so it stores more calories t&an normal

as fat to 'rotect us from deat& in t&e future. &e :od# ne%er forgets. It res'onds Oust like Gin'ut and

out'ut or Gcause and eCect. Animals in nature don;t t&ink twice :efore geZng t&eir >ll. We s&ouldn;t

follow e%er#t&ing an animal doesE :ut some non2&uman animals are %er# similar to us in terms of

anatom#. We can learn from t&em in an as'ect suc& as diet. Humans are most similar to 'rimatesE and

a'es eat &uge fruit meals unl t&e#;re dra'ed o%er t&e :ranc&es wit& full :ellies. It seems almost too

eas# to make t&e conclusion t&at &umans s&ould do t&e same or similar.

&e w&ole conce't of :reat&arianism is actuall# Ruite disres'ecTul and ungrateful to mot&er nature.

0ur mot&er is 'ro%iding us wit& all t&is :eauful :ount# of sweet sustenance and a:undanceE and some

c&oose to den# it. All of our nutrion is :eaufull# 'acked wit&in 'lant foods. &e fruits are &ere for usE

:ut 'eo'le w&o are mislead or on an ego tri' c&oose to entertain t&e conce't of not eang to reac&

some new state of s'iritual enlig&tenmentE w&ile c&ildren are star%ing and would lo%e to :e in t&e

'osion to eat food. It;s e=tremel# ungrateful to restrict #ourself and is not s'iritualE intelligentE or

enlig&tening at all.

Ironicall#E t&ese so2called s'iritual Ggurus w&o 'romote calorie restricon alwa#s &a%e some kind of

su''lementsE 'oonsE and eli=irs to sell t&eir following. W&#( 4ecause t&ese t&ings are smulants t&atare needed to make t&e indi%idual feel like &e or s&e &as energ#. &e snake oil salesmen &a%e mastered

t&at art of selling to 'eo'le ignorant of t&e trut&. &e# make cas& oC of ot&ers :# telling t&em t&e#

s&ould not eat or s&ould restrict calories. 4utE &e#E :u# m# su'erfoods and su''lements

3ugar

&e descri'on of t&is diet tells us t&at it;s &ig& in car:o&#drates. &ese are eit&er in t&e form of

com'le= car:o&#drates )c&ains of sugars t&at take longer to :reak down* or sim'le car:o&#drates)sim'le sugars t&at a:sor: into t&e :loodstream and cells Ruickl#*. o idenf# t&em sim'l#E com'le=

car:o&#drates are usuall# recognied :# t&eir starc&inessE suc& as in rice and 'otatoesE w&ile sim'le

car:o&#drates are usuall# recognied :# t&eir sweetnessE like fruits. All car:o&#drates are essenall#

sugar if it;s not alread# a sim'le sugar t&en t&e :od# will :reak down t&e com'le= sugars into sim'ler

molecules.

3ugar &as :een demonied e=traordinaril# in our societ# as somet&ing t&at is almost e%il. It is almost

ironicE t&enE t&at e%er# cell in t&e &uman :od# runs on sugar. &e :iological term for sugar is glucose.

&e :rain is fueled 'rimaril# on glucose wit&out enoug& glucose going to our :rainE we e='erience :rain

fog and lack of 'ro'er cogni%e funcon. We also need a &ig& enoug& le%el of :lood sugar for our %italorgans to funcon and to :e ali%e. "ac& cell works to :urn glucose t&roug& a 'rocess called aero:ic

meta:olism to create energ#. &e mitoc&ondria :urns t&e glucose wit& o=#genE t&e glucose o=idiesE and

t&e end 'roduct results in &eat energ# and adenosine tri'&os'&ate )AP*. &is AP is t&en released as

energ# or stored in t&e musclesE de'ending u'on t&e cell;s needs.

Humans &a%e a natural sweet toot&. 0ur taste:uds detect sweetness are at t&e ' of t&e tongue and is

~ 84 ~



generall# our onl# 'leasura:le taste sensaon. If we taste somet&ing t&at is %er# salt#E :ier or sourE we

generall# don;t like it or can;t eat muc& of it. 4ut our tongues lo%e to taste sweetness in a:undance. &is

is com'letel# natural and necessar# for our sur%i%al. 0ur tongues are designed like t&is :ecause it tells us

w&at our :odies need to sur%i%e- car:o&#drates. &e 'leasure we get for sweetness is a mec&anism to

detect foods t&at will gi%e us t&e energ# we need. 0f course our 'leasure centers can :e &iOacked :#

cultural condioning and unnatural foods suc& as re>ned sugarsE w&ic& are not o'mal like fruits

:ecause t&e# lack nutrientsE water and >:er. If we can;t get fruitE t&e &uman :od# secrets an en#me in

t&e sali%a called am#lase to digest com'le= car:o&#drates or starc&es into sim'le sugars t&e :od# canuse. W&en we den# our :od# 'ro'er fuelE we are commiZng a great disser%ice to it and oursel%es.

According to t&e our :iological 'rocesses and anatomical funconE glucose is a:solutel# %ital to our

'&#siological needs. &e Rueson is w&at kind of sugar is &ealt&#( &e re>nedE w&ite sugar t&at is in

most candiesE cakesE and soda 'o' is de>nitel# not good for #ou. Howe%erE we s&ould not demonie t&e

sugar in w&ole foods. W&en t&e Gnutrion aut&ories %ilif# sugar t&e# are referring to t&e 'rocessed

re>ned sugars in candies or aem'ng to dissuade 'eo'le from :eing &ealt&# :ecause t&at costs t&em

mone#. 9ruit is t&e &ealt&iest of t&e sugar2ric& foodsE and is t&e most natural food on t&e 'lanet for

&umans. &e non2&uman :eings we most closel# resem:leE 'rimatesE are fruitarians. Howe%erE cooked

car:o&#drates or starc&es suc& as rice and 'otatoes are also e=tremel# &ealt&# for usE :ecause t&e# &a%ea similar 'ackaging of >:er and nutrients.

3tarch is the 3taple of the #orldFs 4ealthiest Populations

3ince me and memorial of &uman ci%iliaonE we &a%e used starc& as a dietar# sta'le to meet our

caloric needs. 3ome of t&e most 'o'ular starc&es are- riceE maieE cornE :arle#E w&eatE milletE Ruinoa and

'otatoes. NowE Oust :ecause somet&ing &as :een going for eonsE doesn;t mean it;s rig&tE :ut it dis'els

t&e m#t& t&at meat and ot&er animal 'roducts fueled ci%iliaons. 3tarc&es were t&e foods t&at su''lied

us wit& our 'rimar# energ# sourceE car:o&#drate$glucose. In trut&E fruit would &a%e :een t&e :eer

'rimar# energ# sourceE :ut not e%er#one li%ed in t&e correct en%ironment to forage or grow fruitE

'arcularl# in t&e necessar# Ruanes. &is made starc& t&e ne=t :est car:o&#drate source for our

energ# needs. In toda#;s worldE it;s muc& easier to get fruit w&ere%er #ou li%eE :ut it;s not alwa#s &ig&

Rualit# or aCorda:le. "%en t&oug& a ,88_ fruit diet is 'ossi:leE it is not eas# or sustaina:le for ??.?_ of

'eo'le. It is not recommended t&at someone eat a strict raw %egan or fruitarian dietE :ut a mostl# raw

fruitarian diet wit& cooked starc&es included. It ma# not :e ,88_ Gnatural to eat cooked food for an

animalE :ut &umans can sustain and e%en t&ri%e on cooked starc&es we are a %er# uniRue animal. Most

of us also li%e in a world t&at doesn;t su''ort eang ,88_ raw food. It;s muc& :eer to feed oC of

cooked food t&an to not eat at all w&en good fruits aren;t a%aila:le. Bemem:erE calories are im'ortant

and we need to take s'ecial care of our :iological needs.

If we tra%el around t&e world we realie t&at all t&e successfulE trimmestE slimmestE &ealt&iestE and

energec 'o'ulaonsE wit&out e=ce'onE o:tain t&e :ulk of t&eir calories from car:o&#drates )fruitE and

starc&.* 5gandans are t&e :iggest consumer of :ananas in t&e world and eat a lot of corn and ot&er

starc& :ased foods as a sta'le. "t&io'ians sustain on cereals grainsE 'otatoesE and ot&er car:o&#drates.

~ 85 ~



@en#a 'roduces some of t&e world;s leanest and fastest runners and eat a lot of fruits and starc&es. 0ne

of t&e fa%orite meals of @en#a and 5ganda is 5galiE w&ic& is usuall# made out of cornmeal cooked in

water to a starc&# consistenc#. 0t&er cultures t&at are leanE &ealt&# and t&ri%e on starc&es are t&e rural

+&inese w&om t&ri%e on rice. &e rural Ka'anese w&om t&ri%ed on rice and sweet 'otatoes. &e &ais

w&om t&ri%e on fruit and rice. &e Atecs w&om t&ri%ed on maie )corn*. &e IncasE ci%iliaons in t&e

AndesE and Peru%ians w&om t&ri%ed and t&ri%e on 'otatoes. &e ancient "g#'ans also su:stanated on

w&eat and :arle#. &e gladiators of t&e 'ast were also referred to as t&e G:arle# menE w&ose diets

resem:led t&at of %egans and didn;t eat an# animal es& or animal 'roducts :ecause it slowed t&emdown in :ale. &e starc& in :arle# ga%e t&em t&e strengt&E %igorE and energ# t&e# needed to :e t&e

:est t&e# could :e in com'eon.

3tarc&es &a%e :een used and are sll :eing used consistentl# around t&e glo:e :# all successfulE &ealt&#E

and trim 'o'ulaons for t&e :ulk of energ# needs. &e stor# is t&e same w&et&er it;s t&e 'otatoes in

3out& AmericaE rice in AsiaE w&eat in "uro'eE maie in central AmericaE or :arel#E :eansE milletE r#eE and

sweet 'otatoes around ot&er 'arts of t&e glo:e. +ar:o&#drates &as :een t&e center of energ# needs and

nutrion t&roug&out all of known &uman &istor#. You;ll noce t&at t&ese cultures t&at use car:o&#drates

as a sta'le are %irtuall# are ne%er o:ese. It is onl# w&en t&e western diet G&ea%# in animal 'roductsE

comes to 'la#E t&at a societ# :ecomes o:ese and sick wit& diseases of abuence. In AsiaE it was noted inG&e c&ina stud#E t&at t&e rural +&inese were %irtuall# all slim and &ealt&#E :ut w&en t&e +&inese were

o:ser%ed in t&e metro'olises of +&inaE o:esit# :ecame %er# nocea:le across t&e 'o'ulaon. &e

reason is most :ig cies &a%e :ecome westernied. &e cultures and dietar# &a:its of t&e original

+&inese transioned to t&at of a western dietE w&ic& is one &ig& in animal 'roducts and ot&er fa#

foods. &is &a''ens not onl# to t&e +&ineseE :ut an# naons w&ere a &ig& car:o&#drate culture is

introduced to a western diet graduall# :ecomes o:ese aQer t&e western wa# of eang is introduced.

!uring feudalismE ro#alt# and no:ilit# owned 'ro'ert# and goods t&at ke't t&em monetaril# wealt&#.

&is ric&ness was reected in all as'ects of t&eir lifest#leE including diet. &e# consumed a large amount

of animal foodsE w&ile la:orers relied on %egeta:les and grains for sustenance. &e land owners e%enfor:ade 'easants from &unng so ro#alt# could engage in &unng s'orts. In modern western societ#E we

all eat like kings and Rueens of t&e 'ast w&o oQen died #oung. &is is not to sa# t&at t&e 'oor didn;t get

sick or die #oungE :ut it wasn;t from diet2related diseases. &e# died of 'lagues or %irusesE

communica:le diseases from lack of sanitaonE and t&e like. Man# of t&e kings of t&e 'ast got

o%erw&elmingl# o:ese oC t&eir ric& diets. Western societ# eats t&e foods found in &anksgi%ing and

+&ristmas feasts %irtuall# e%er# da#E like kings and Rueens. &e s'ecial dinner &as :ecome e%er# ot&er

meal and an e%er# da# occasion. It was wrongl# t&oug&t t&at gluon# was t&e reason ro#als were fat and

sickE t&at t&e# sim'l# o%erate. It is im'ossi:le to o%ereat on a s'ecies s'eci>c diet. 0ne can eat fruit and

starc& all da# and not :ecome o:ese. It is onl# w&en we eat unnatural foods t&at moderaon is reRuired.

)ut Conventional #isdom 3ays Car0s !ake 8ou .at

9or a su:stance t&at s&ould :e our 'rimar# energ# sourceE it sure &as goen a lot o''osion from t&e

nutrion Gaut&ories. 3o w&at does t&e science sa#( AQer our food :reaks down into sugars t&e# need

~ 86 ~



to enter our :loodstream. W&en our glucose needs are met and our :lood is at ca'acit#E an# e=cess

sugar re'lenis&es our musclesE w&ere long2term energ# 'otenal is stored in t&e form of Ggl#cogen.

W&en at&letes car:o2loadE t&e# are re'lenis&ing t&eir gl#cogen stores for t&eir :ig da#. Most 'eo'le

ne%er &a%e full stores and man# &a%e c&ronicall# low gl#cogen stores. <l#cogen &as t&e esmated

ca'acit# to store an#w&ere from E888 to DE888 e=tra calories of sugar for t&e a%erage 'erson and more

for at&letes. 0nce t&ese gl#cogen stores are fullE sugar can 'otenall# go t&roug& a 'rocess known as de

no%o li'ogenesis or !NL. &is 'rocess is %er# ineXcient and ta=ing our :od#E &owe%erE so it does not

occur oQen. Ne%ert&elessE !NL is t&e 'rocess t&at stores sugar as fat. &is 'rocess is w&at man# Ggurusin t&e nutrion and weig&t2loss world refer to w&en t&e# demonie sugar. We must wonder w&# t&e# are

singling out t&is 'rocess w&en t&e :od# tries its :est to a%oid it and it;s an e=tremel# rare occurrence.

&e con%ersion of glucose to fat is ,8 mes less eXcient t&an sim'l# storing fat in a fat cell. It is also

more costl#E :ecause it takes awa# t&e 'otenal for t&is sugar to :e :urned as fuel for man# of our

funcons. &inking alone reRuires a constant su''l# of glucose to t&e :rainE w&ic& is w&# t&e :rain

demands more glucose t&an an# ot&er organ. All :odil# 'rocesses suc& as walkingE talkingE :reat&ingE

and digeson reRuire glucoseE es'eciall# at a cellular le%el. G!ietar# t&ermogenesis is a 'rocess in w&ic&

e=cess glucose :urns oC as &eat. It is muc& more likel# to occur t&an !NL. "%en if we don;t e=erciseE our

:odies will use some sugar to fuel ot&er :odil# mo%ements and ac%ies. 0ur :odies trul# are amaing

mac&ines.

"%er# :od# 'artE from cell to organE is in a constant need for glucose. It;s %irtuall# im'ossi:le to o%ereat

on natural sugarsE :ecause our glucose stores are alwa#s in use. If one drank a :ole of &ig&2fructose

corn s#ru' and sat on t&e couc& all da# mul'le mes in a row t&en t&e# ma# %er# well gain fatE :ut

t&ere is a reason t&at t&is 'racce doesn;t a''eal to most 'eo'le. 0ur sweet toot& can tell us w&en

somet&ing is too muc& and w&en we sto' geZng saated :# car:o&#drates eit&er in t&e form of

starc&esE fruitsE and e%en re>ned sugars. 0ur saaon is a sign t&at we are coming to our fullness of

glucose. 9ood in t&eir w&ole formE is also full of >:er and %olumeE so our stomac&s will e='lode :ased

u'on t&e %olume of w&ole food car:o&#drates we eat :efore we can o%erdose on sugar from w&olefoods.

Mul'le studies &a%e :een 'roduced w&ere su:Oects were Go%erfed car:o&#drates and 'ut on a

sedentar# lifest#le. 9or e=am'leE in one stud#E :ot& o:ese and lean women were Go%erfed :# D8_ wit&

re>ned sugar. &e aut&ors of t&is stud# calculated t&at :etween and g fat was 'roduced t&roug& !NL.

If we use t&e most fat gained )g* or 7 calories dail#E t&en it would take nearl# mont&s to gain one

'ound.

<esults0ased Gudgment

"%en t&oug& some of t&ese studies s&ow car:s don;t contri:ute to o:esit#E some studies do. 3o w&o or

w&at do we trust( W&# is t&ere all t&is conicng informaon in t&is >eld of nutrion researc&( WellE

Gscience claims not to know com'letel# &ow t&e meta:olism worksE es'eciall# !NL. &e researc& is not

%er# clear on it. 3oE t&e most logical t&ing to do if we wis& to :e t&e closest to trut& on t&is su:Oect of

~ 87 ~



weig&t and &ealt&E is to :e aware of w&at 'o'ulaons eat t&at are trim and &ealt&#. If #ou focus long

enoug& #ou will see t&e law of cause and eCect 'la# out.

It;s ad%ocated to also :e #our own scienstE and use t&e scien>c met&od in #our own life. 0:ser%aon

and re'eon can :e used :# eac& and e%er# one of us to make our own conclusions wit&out rel#ing

u'on t&e Ge='erts to 'roduce t&eir reduconist a''roac& at e%idence. It;s good to ask #ourself t&e

Rueson- are t&e 'eo'le w&om eat t&e most riceE cornE 'otatoesE and fruit fat or lean in t&e long2term( I

&a%e #et to >nd an# long2term fruitarians or starc& lo%ers w&o are o%erweig&t in t&e long2term. &is st#leof diet leads to leanE trim :odies.

&he 3uper6iciality of #eightLoss

Weig&t2loss can :e su'er>cial if made to :e one;s main focus in life. 0n t&e ot&er &andE wanng to :e

leanE >t and &ealt&# are not su'er>cial at all. &ese t&ings are a result of caring a:out #ourself and #our

:od# :ecause t&e# are a sign of '&#sical &ealt&. 0ne cannot connue to :e o:ese and :e &ealt&#.

Howe%erE &ealt& isn;t Oust :eing trim eit&er. W&en #ou;re &ealt&#E #ou;ll automacall# :e leanE or :e int&e 'rocess of :ecoming lean. It is t&e law of corres'ondence. Howe%erE weig&t2loss in and of itself is not

&ealt&. 9urt&ermoreE since we now know &ow t&e &uman mind and su:conscious worksE it is :est to use

terms t&at su''ort t&e realit# #ou wis& to create. Instead of weig&t2lossE it would actuall# :e :eer to

refer to t&is 'rocess as Gweig&t2release. &e reason for t&is is t&at t&e word Gloss &as a nega%e

connotaon t&at ma# eCect t&e mind and nega%el# aCect #our realit# w&en referring to #our :od#. &e

word Grelease &as a muc& more 'osi%e connotaon. We usuall# associate release wit& w&at is

relie%ing us.

9ortunatel#E t&e &ig&2car: lifest#le naturall# releases e=cess weig&tE :ecause %er# lile fat is consumed

for 'otenal storage. &e fats t&at we eat go to %ital 'arts of t&e :od#E like t&e :rainE t&at needs essenalfats. &e &ig&2car: lifest#le also gi%es us t&e natural energ# to :e ac%e and lose weig&t eCec%el#.

Howe%erE if one eats a moderate to &ig& amount of sugar and fatE t&en it is a reci'e for o:esit#. &is is

:ecause t&e :od# cannot assimilate glucose 'ro'erl#E as descri:ed :elowE so it is una:le to :urn fat

eCec%el#.

If one eats a low2car: dietE t&en t&e :od# will essenall# go into star%aon mode and :urn fat instead of

glucose for energ# )called ketosis*E so it won;t store large amounts of fat. &is weig&t2loss and star%aon

met&od is t&e :asis of w&at t&ese dangerous low2car: diets 'romote. &e low2car: diet works ra'idl# for

weig&t2loss in t&e s&ort2termE mostl# t&roug& inial loss of water weig&t )&#draon in t&e muscles*.

Howe%erE it is not sustaina:le and 'eo'le gain :ack t&e weig&t t&e# lost on t&e diet. Low2car: diets leadto man# ad%erse &ealt& eCectsE including an increased risk of deat&. "%er# cell in t&e &uman :od# runs

on glucoseE and to de'ri%e our cells of glucose is to de'ri%e our cells and oursel%es of life.

#hat A0out Dia0etes

~ 88 ~



Weig&t gain and dia:etes &a''en w&en 'eo'le eat a large amount of fat and glucose2ric& foodsE w&ic& is

&ig&l# common in t&e 3tandard American !iet )3.A.!.*. Be>ned sugarsE 'rocessed foodsE and fa#

animal2:ased foods are a sta'le for t&e t#'ical American. W&# t&is is dangerous is :ecause &ig& le%els of

:lood li'ids 're%ent glucose from :eing 'ro'erl# a:sor:ed into our cells. Be>ned sugars also s'ike :lood

glucose le%els unnaturall# &ig&. &is fa# :lood leads to insulin resistance. W&en glucose is in&i:ited

from :eing distri:uted to t&e cellsE 'eo'le can de%elo' dia:etes and &ig& trigl#cerides.

Man# 'lant2:ased doctors use a diet &ig& in car:o&#drates and low in fat to &el' 'aents re%erse t#'e2dia:etesE 're%ent t#'e2,E and drascall# &el' t&ose t&at alread# &a%e t#'e2, dia:etes manage it. W&en

we eat a diet low in fatE we a%oid furt&er arterial damage and allow our %essels to o'en u' so our :lood

can ow freel#E &el'ing glucose :e eCortlessl# distri:uted to our cells- dia:etes sim'l# cannot t&ri%e in

t&is free2owing s#stem. It is an en%ironment of easeE not disease.

Are &here 2ood .ats

&ere are good fatsE :ut let;s >rst discuss damaging fats. Animal fats are saturated fatsE w&ic& are full ofc&olesterol and can cause arterial lesions w&ic& lead to clogging. Animal fats are adi'ose ssueE w&ic& is

t&e same com'osion of fat t&at &umans store on t&eir :od#. It would onl# make sense for t&e animal

fat we eat to get stored as fat in our own :od# w&en t&ere is no ot&er necessit# for it. &e fat of t&e

animal is essenall# Oust transferred to t&at of t&e &uman w&en )s*&e ingests it. &e :od# doesn;t :urn

fat for energ#E so it gets stored as fat. 9at is called fat for a reason t&e fat #ou eat is generall# t&e fat #ou

wear.

&ere are fats t&at are referred to as essenal fatsE w&ic& means our :odies cannot 'roduce t&ese on

our own so we need to get t&em from our food. 0mega2s and omega26s are two of t&e most im'ortant

fats we need to get from an e=ternal source. &ese fats actuall# 'rotect our :rainE ner%es and ot&er 'arts

of t&e :od#. &ese essenal fats can :e found in 'lant foods alone. W&ate%er fats aren;t essenal do not

need to :e consumed and t&e worst are trans fatE animal fats and re>ned or &eated fats.

A cou'le e=am'les of good 'lant fats in t&eir w&ole food forms are seeds and fruits suc& as a%ocado.

&ere are also a %er# small amount of fat in all fruits and %egeta:les. 9or e=am'leE a :anana contains

.,_ fat and celer# contains ?.6_ fat. Hig&2fat fruitsE suc& as a%ocadosE can :e un&ealt&# and lead to

weig&t gain if eaten in &ig& RuanesE :ut t&e# are >ne if eaten moderaonE and are muc& more &ealt&

'romong t&an animal fats and re>ned fats suc& as oils :ecause of t&eir 'ackaging S >:er and nutrients.

0ils a:o%e a %er# small 'ercentage of our caloric intake are detrimental to our &ealt& and 'romote fat

gain. All oils are re>ned :ecause t&e# aren;t a w&ole food. 9urt&ermoreE all oils are ,88_ fat. ,

ta:les'oon of oli%e oil is ,,? caloriesE w&ic& 'uts into 'ers'ec%e &ow eas# it is to o%ereat on fat. If we

eat too man# fa# foods t&en t&at lea%es less room for us to eat enoug& car:o&#dratesE and it interferes

wit& our a:sor'on of glucose 'ro'erl# and can cause insulin resistance.

~ 89 ~



&he Calorie <atio

o li%e a &ealt&#E &ig&2car: %egan lifest#leE t&ere is an o:Oec%e rao w&ic& oCers us a useful guideline or

:aseline. It is used :# man# of t&e &ealt&iestE >estE and most ac%e indi%iduals wit&in t&e &ealt&#

lifest#le communit#. &is &el's demonstrate t&e eXcac# of t&is rao for o%erall &ealt& and >tness. &e

rao is as follows- 8_ or more calories coming from car:o&#drateE ,8_ or less calories coming from

'roteinE and ,8_ or less calories coming from fat. &e term G8$,8$,8 was coined :# a raw %egan and

somemes fruitarian named !ouglas <ra&am. 0ne will e='erience great %italit# if one eats close to t&ismacronutrient rao. G8$,8$,8 is an o:Oec%eE :asic re'resentaon of our s'ecies s'eci>c dietE in

terms of a caloric rao resulng from a mostl# frugi%orous and 'arall# &er:i%orous diet t&at is w&oll#

'lant2:ased.

~ 90 ~



Chapter H: 4ealth? #ealth ' 3uccess

Healt& starts in t&e mind as wit& e%er#t&ing else it is t&e law of mentalism. Healt& :egins as a mental

state.

.ind #ealth in 4ealth

Healt& and wealt& are essenall# t&e same t&ing t&ese terms can :e used interc&angea:l#. 3omeone

t&at em:odies good '&#sicalE mentalE and s'iritual &ealt& will t&en go on to :e res'ecTull# successfulE

and see t&e fruits of t&eir own internal wealt&. Beall#E t&ere is no GacRuiring ric&es to :e wealt&#. o

acRuire wealt& is to acRuire &eat&E and %ice %ersa. &e t&ings #ou need will automacall# fall into 'laceE

and t&e t&ings #ou want will :e far more aaina:le aQer &ealt& is acRuired. &is is t&e Law of

+orres'ondence.

&e great Rueson t&at is asked 'ertaining to t&is e='lanaon is- &ow do I get &ealt&# w&en I am not

wealt&#( WellE like an#t&ing elseE it is a 'rocess. We must start somew&ereE and w&ere #ou :eginde'ends on #our current le%el of &ealt&. "%en t&e dirt 'oor can :egin to regain t&eir &ealt&. &e word

Gregain is em'&asied &ere :ecause &ealt& is our in&erent and natural state as &uman :eings. Wit&out

nega%e and destruc%e outside forces t&at corru't t&e :od#E we are all &ealt&#E successfulE and wealt&#

:eings. It is onl# w&en our 'urit# &as :een com'romised :# t&e nega%e as'ect of t&is world allowed

inside t&at we lose our &ealt&. Luckil#E our :odies &a%e a tremendous ca'acit# to &eal.

#ealthy is -ot <ich

Wealt& isn;t sim'l# monetar# ric&es. Your &ealt& is Ged into #our wealt&E and cannot dissol%e in an

instant like monetar# ric&es. Bic&es come and goE :ut wealt& sta#s wit& #ou more consistentl#. Monetar#

wealt& consists of '&#sical o:Oects like mone#E #our &ouseE landE material o:Oects and ot&er 'ro'ert#.

rue wealt& mo%es awa# from t&e mundane into lo%eE self2res'ectE fruiTul relaons&i'sE and #our a:ilit#

to e='ress crea%it#.

A mainstream ra''er is ric&E :ut w&at is so good a:out ric&es( Bic&es tend to make one ounder around

as if t&e# cannot control t&e 'ower %ested to t&em. 4eing ric&E is not owning an# 'owerE it onl# seems to

merel# :e 'ri%ilege t&at can :e taken awa# from one :efore t&e# realie t&at t&e# &a%en;t done an#t&ing

wort&w&ile wit& t&eir ric&es. Bic& 'eo'le are sickl# and t&erefore not wealt&# t&e# are sickl# :ecauset&e# &a%e no self2controlE and self2control is necessar# to :e wealt&#. Wit& sickness comes lossE and loss

is desned to &a''en wit& ric&es. Wealt&# men and women realie t&e# don;t &a%e an#t&ing to loseE

:ecause t&e# don;t trul# own an#t&ing. "%er#t&ing is merel# a giQ :# t&e creator and mot&er nature for

our :ene>t we did not create t&e uni%erse and t&is eart&E :ut we &a%e :een giQed t&e use of t&e

resources. It;s not to sa# a wealt&# man w&om &as 'ut in t&e work doesn;t deser%e t&e fruits of &is me.

Peo'le can deser%e giQsE :ut :eing wealt&#E is understanding t&at we can onl# trul# :orrow resources.

Man did not make t&e water &e drinksE land &e walks u'onE or air &e :reat&es. Man &as taken ad%antage

~ 91 ~



of t&e eart& and its resourcesE and t&inks &e can do w&at &e wants wit& t&emE 'ollung t&e en%ironment

and causing destrucon in t&e 'rocess. 3ickness :reeds sickness. &e ones in unlawful 'ower are literall#

sick 's#c&o'at&sE and t&ese so2called Gelites are neit&er wealt&# nor &ealt&#. &e lust for acRuiring

mone# can lead to ric&esE :ut t&e ric& act Oust as addicts doE wit& mone# :eing t&eir drug. An addict is

ne%er sas>ed wit& t&e doseE and t&e same can :e said wit& for ric&. &e# fear loss and do w&ate%er it

takes to aain more ric&es w&et&er t&at is to l ieE tortureE stealE or kill to aain more. A wealt&#

indi%idual does not fear material and monetar# lossE :ut &as con>dence in t&eir a:ilit# to li%e a fruiTul

and rewarding life.

#hat is 3uccess

3uccess is neit&er in&erentl# good or :adE and doesn;t s#non#mousl# lead to wealt&. Howe%erE to reac&

&ealt&E and wealt&E successes needs to :e esta:lis&ed. &e reason w&# success isn;t alwa#s in line wit&

wealt& is t&e same reason t&at a drug2lord can :e successful at 'us&ing crack cocaineE or a master can :e

successful at controlling &is$&er sla%es. 3uccess isn;t alwa#s :ased in w&at;s moralE or w&at;s orderl#E and

t&erefore doesn;t &a%e to lead to an# kind of wealt&. A man can :low u' a :uildingE and kill innocent

li%es successfull#E :ut t&is does not make a man wealt&# t&is is t&e result of c&aos. A man can :e

addicted to %ideo2gamesE w&ile :eing %er# successful at t&emE :ut &is o:sessi%e nature of 'la#ing %ideo2

games will e%entuall# degrade &is &ealt&. &e same can :e said for someone w&om is o:sessed wit& a

s'ort and losing massi%e amounts of slee' and reco%er# me due to o%er2training. 0:sessi%eness is an

e=tremit#E w&ic& results in an im:alance. An# im:alance leads to nega%e conseRuences for our &ealt&

and long2term success.

4ow Do I 3tart

How does one :egin to :ecome &ealt&# and t&erefore :ecome wealt&#( You must >rst know w&at

com'oses of &ealt& to :egin wit&E w&ic& &as alread# :een e='lained in t&e 'roceeding secons. Healt&

is )w*&oliscE com'osing of t&e '&#sicalE mentalE and s'iritual as'ects. &e :iggest 'orons of &ealt& are

com'rised of :eing in alignment wit& moralit# ?s'iritual &ealt&*E dismantling t&e nega%e series of

'rograms in #our mind )mental &ealt&*E and 'ro'er diet 'lus e=ercise )'&#sical &ealt&*. &is com:inaon

or trinit# com'rises one;s lifest#le. 3egmenng and com'artmentaliing one as'ect of &ealt& is unwise

and will result in failure. &is is w&# onl# focusing u'on diet does not work. Howe%erE t&e &ig&2car:

'lant2:ased lifest#leE w&ic& includes t&e %egan dietE is 'ro:a:l# t&e single :est wa# to start gaining ones;

&ealt& and wealt& :ack. As t&e sa#ing goesE G#ou are w&at #ou eat. GYou :eing #our :od#E mindE and

soul. "ang :eer will start clearing #our t&oug&ts and mindE clear out karmic :lockages in t&e soul and

consciousE and :egin to 'ro%ide one wit& more energ# to engage in '&#sical ac%it#- it;s all connected.

And if #ou;re worried a:out aCording to do t&isE consider t&at a 'lant2:ased diet centered around riceE

'otatoesE :eansE and :ananas can :e e=tremel# c&ea' and e=ercise is free

Also remem:er t&at #ou don;t need to :e 'erfect to :egin t&is 'rocess of &ealt&E :ut :eing %egan is

necessar#. Most of us &a%e eaten 'rocessed foods and animal 'roducts our w&ole lifemesE and feel

addicted to t&em. It can take some me to transion to a &ig&2car: wa# of eangE and t&at;s >ne. egan

~ 92 ~



Ounk food does e=istE and it;s muc& :eer to eat t&ose t&en to connue on eang animal foods. egan

Ounk food is sll &ealt&ier t&an animal foods. &ere are 'roducts on t&e market t&at taste and feel like

animal es& if #ou;re &a%ing cra%ings. egan mock c&eeses and 'lant2:ased milks also e=ist and taste

%er# good. Heat& is a 'rocess and a good rule of t&um: is to connuall# mo%e in t&e direcon of adding

more fruits and w&ole foods into #our diet. As long as t&is 'rocess &a''en consistentl#E #ou are

:ecoming &ealt&ier.

As soon as #ou make t&e c&oice to li%e a &ealt&ier lifest#leE e%er#t&ing else will :egin to c&ange for t&e:eer #ou will start to regain #our wealt& 3tart to e=ercise moreE meditate moreE start a #oga rouneE

and go outside to get sunE fres& airE and reconnect wit& t&e eart&. 3tart to incor'orate more organicE

w&oleE rawE and ri'e fruits and %egeta:les into #our dietE and #ou will :egin to see #our life e='lode wit&

%i:ranc# e='onenall#. Hig&er le%els of &a''iness will :e ac&ie%ed all from li%ing a &ealt&ier lifest#le.

!iet is %er# im'ortant :ecause if it is not correct t&en #ou won;t &a%e t&e energ# to t&ink 'ro'erl#E or

care to do ot&er &ealt& related ac%iesE suc& as '&#sical ac%it#.

An#one can :egin to li%e a &ealt&ier lifest#le no maer t&eir >nancial situaonE so >nances s&ould not :e

an e=cuse. If #ou sll >nd it in&i:ingE it;s recommended to ask for &el'. Ma#:e s'end some me wit&

famil# and$or friendsE and let t&em su''ort #ou unl #ou can get #our life :ack on course. &ere are

unlimited o'ons to start regaining t&e unlimited wealt& t&at we all 'ossess.

0ne t&ing t&at is not neededE :ut is e=tremel# :ene>cial to making t&ese 'osi%e c&anges in #our lifeE is

a su''ort grou'. &is is made e=tremel# eas# wit& social media. An#one wit& internet access can :egin

to connect wit& like minds an#w&ere online t&roug& social media sites and t&e like. &e nega%e as'ect

of social media is t&at it &as dum:ed societ# down wit& t&e massi%e distracons of fri%olous drama and

entertainment. Howe%erE social media &as an agreea:le as'ect to it as wellE in w&ic& it can :e used to

:uild networks and su''ort grou's wit& common lifest#les and am:ions. Learning a:out %eganism and

sta#ing %eganE for e=am'leE is muc& easier w&en #our :egin to connect wit& ot&er %egansE eit&er in real

life or on t&e we:. All t&is is 'ossi:le wit&out t&e internetE :ut man# 'eo'le do not li%e in areas w&ere alot of %egans can readil# :e accessed and connected wit&. &e internet makes it muc& easier to connect

wit& like minds :eing t&at t&e %egan mo%ement is currentl# a %er# small 'ercentage of t&e 'o'ulaon.

Loat&ing can :egin to set in wit&out an# su''ortE or 'eo'le w&om are doing t&is wit& #ou. &e internet

connects millions of indi%iduals in one 'lace w&o are doing similar and ins'iring ac%ies. You can

:ecome more engaged in #our 'assions w&en #ou see ot&ers succeeding in similar as'iraons. &is

works for an# &ealt& focus- t&ere are communies of #ogisE runnersE c#clistsE swimmers weig&t2liQersE

and more. You;ll >nd man# 'eo'le in t&e %egan communit# are also into >tness and ot&er )w*&olisc

as'ects of a &ealt&# lifest#leE :ecause man# %egans do innerE underE and o%er2stand w&at it means to :e

trul# &ealt&# and wealt&#.

3leep? #ater? 3ugar

&ese t&ree t&ings consist of #our :asic '&#siological needs. If t&e# are not taken care ofE t&en #our

energ# and &ealt& will suCerE including #our mental state. It;s &ard to t&ink 'ro'erl# w&en t&e :rain isn;t

:eing fed enoug& glucoseE t&e :od#$mind is stressed from de&#draonE and t&e mind &asn;t goen its

~ 93 ~



'ro'er rest from slee'. 0ne cannot 'ro'erl# funcon w&en t&eir :asic '&#siological needs are not met.

You can onl# :e as strong as #our weakest link. ake care of #our 'rimar# necessiesE w&ic& :egin wit&

#ourself Gskillful self2is&ness.

&is is not&ing a:out sur%i%al of t&e >estE w&ic& entails t&at one must do w&ate%er one &as to do to

sur%i%e. W&et&er t&at it stealing or ste''ing on w&oe%er to ful>ll #our needs. 9ul>lling #our needs need

not come from t&eQ or &arm. A good t&ing to do if #ou feel like #ou don;t &a%e t&e resources for #our

needs to :e met is to ask for assistance. As t&e sa#ing goesE GAsk and #ou s&all recei%e. &e uni%erseworks in m#sterious wa#s and a lot of t&e mes we can get w&at we ask for. If #ou;re running low on

mone# to :u# foodE for e=am'leE ask someone to aid #ou unl #ou can get on #our feet. We are not &ere

alone and we s&ould not :e afraid to acce't assistance from ot&ers unl we can stand on our own feet.

3tealing is ne%er reRuiredE :ut if we don;t get w&at we ask for :# anot&er indi%idualE t&ere is sll

o''ortunit# for us to create w&ate%er it is we need we Oust &a%e to :e aware of t&e signs. &ere are

in>nite o''ortunies t&at e=ist for aaining w&at #ou need and we must ful>ll t&ese needs to t&e :est of

our a:ilit# to :e &ealt&# and wealt&#. Life is not&ing wit&out #our own &ealt&. 0nce #ou &a%e #our

&ealt&E #our life will :e %er# ful>llingE sustaina:leE and #ou;ll &a%e t&e energ# to contri:ute to ot&ersE and

t&e worldE in an# wa# #ou wis&.

It can :e %er# c&allenging to &a%e e%en t&ese :asic forms of &ealt& in 'erfect standingE and t&at is a :ig

reason w&# so man# suCer mentall# and '&#sicall#. 3ociet# does not su''ort t&e ful>llment of t&ese

needsE so we must :egin to detac& from societ#E w&ic& is a 'rocess. !on;t :eat #ourself u' if #ou &a%en;t

:een geZng t&e 'ro'er slee'E Oust take note of it and tr# #our :est to :eer ful>ll #our needs. 3tressing

a:out not &a%ing e%er#t&ing 'erfect is will make it worse oC. If #ou feel o%erw&elmed and stressedE use

t&e alc&emical art of transmutaon and con%ert t&at stress into am:ion and determinaon to ful>lling

w&ate%er it is t&at #ou want. We must go against t&e grain at mesE :ecause societ# does not su''ort

&ealt&E :ut we all want to :e &ealt&#. A &ealt&# lifest#leE for t&e most 'artE is in direct o''osion to

societal norms. We must act wit&out care of an#oneJs o'inion and focus on w&at;s :est for us on our

own Oourne#. &ose w&o care enoug& to cricie our dreams don;t maerE and t&ose w&o maer don;tcare. We came into t&is world alone and we will lea%e it alone. We are not &ere aloneE :ut all we &a%e is

our &ealt& no one else is res'onsi:le for t&at :ut oursel%es.

.itness

9itnessE or e=erciseE is one t&e single most :ene>cial t&ings one can do to im'ro%e t&eir mental state and

'&#sical &ealt& :esides diet. P&#sical ac%it# &as :een known to reli%e de'ressionE an=iet#E and :oost t&e

moodE :ecause of t&e endor'&ins t&at '&#sical ac%it# releases in t&e :rain. &is mood :oost is noted in

t&e runner;s world as t&e Grunner;s &ig&E in w&ic& one can actuall# feel &ig& w&ile e=ercising. &is &ig&

sensaon is natural and &ealt&#E created :# endor'&ins. In natureE we would :e 'la#ingE running at

mesE and using our :odies for energ# intensi%e tasks like an# ot&er animal in nature. Howe%erE modern

societ# is constructed around :eing taken e%er#w&ere :# motor %e&icle to trans'ort ourself from 'lace

to 'lace and muc& of our Oo:s or work are >=ed in a cu:icleE an oXceE or a desk in front of t&e com'uter

in a c&air all da#. As a collec%eE :eing sedentar# &as :ecome a regularit#.

~ 94 ~



9or o'mal &ealt&E we need to counteract or su''lement our sedentar# life wit& '&#sical ac%it# if our

current lifest#le doesnJt naturall# incor'orate it. A:out 2 &ours of moderate e=ercise a week is

ad%ocated for o'mal &ealt& and >tness. Moderate e=erciseE :eing e=ercise w&ere one is steadil#

increasing &eart rate at gradual 'ace and sweangE :ut can sll easil# carr# on a normal con%ersaon.

!uring intense e=erciseE it is nearl# im'ossi:le to talk or carr# on a con%ersaon. Intense e=ercise is sll

&ealt&# :ut it;s not sustaina:le if o%erdone. It is ad%ocated to generall# do moderate e=ercise in t&e

:eginning of #our >tness Oourne#E and t&en #ou can graduall# incor'orate intense ac%it# as #ou 'rogress

and get >er and stronger. "=am'les of moderate e=ercise would :e- walkingE OoggingE swimmingE andc#cling at a 'ace suita:le for #our >tness le%el. 3ome more of t&e :ene>ts of >tness include- geZng t&e

l#m'&ac s#stem mo%ingE w&ic& &el's wit& releasing weig&t and t&e eliminaon of to=insE &el's one

slee' :eerE s'eeds u' meta:olismE im'ro%es self2con>denceE and man# more %er# arac%e and &ealt&

'romong reasons to 'arci'ate in a regular >tness 'lan are to :e &ad.

3taying 4ydrated and Low3odium

Anot&er 'riorit# for a &ealt&# :od# is &#draon. 0ur :odies are made u' of o%er 68_ water. You :rain is#our :iggest liRuid assetE com'osed of D_ water. &e :rain is onl# _ of #our total :od# weig&tE #et

accounts for ,$D or 8_ of #our :lood circulaon &at is nearl# 8_ of all water in #our :od# :eing used

u' :# t&e :rain. Water is second onl# to o=#gen for our sur%i%alE and we can onl# sur%i%e a cou'le da#s

wit&out it. Ha%ing enoug& water in our :od# is essenal to %irtuall# all :odil# funconsE es'eciall# :rain

funcon. It is recommended to drink at least 2 liters of water e%er da#E and more if #ou;re e=ercising

oQen. Your 'ee s&ould :e %er# 'ale #ellow or clearE and #ou s&ould 'ee around 2,8 mes a da#E wit&

one or more 'ees at nig&t. If #our 'ee is dark #ellow it is %er# likel# a sign of e=treme de&#draon. Most

of societ# is c&ronicall# de&#drated and doesn;t e%en know it. !e&#draon leads to fague and ot&er

s#m'toms of 'oor &ealt&. +onsuming enoug& water also &el's us& to=ins out of t&e :od#.

W&en it comes to sodiumE t&e general 'o'ulaon consumes wa# too muc&. &e a%erage American

consumes :etween E888 and E688 mg dail#. According to t&e American Heart AssociaonE e%er#one

s&ould reduce t&eir sodium intake to ,ED88mg or less dail#. It is also stated t&at we onl# need 88mg of

sodium a da#E w&ic& can :e aained from w&ole fruit and %egeta:les alone. "=cess sodium in t&e :od#

can cause uid retenonE as well as 'uXness t&at can gi%e t&e im'ression t&at fat &as :een accruedE

alt&oug& it is Oust water weig&t. It;s recommended t&at t&e a%erage 'erson &a%e :etween D8 and

D88mg of sodium 'er da#. More sodium can :e added to t&e dietE in t&e form of mineral salts or e=tra

foods like celer#E if one e=ercises or sweats a lot.

3leep

An old Kamaican 'ro%er:- G"arl# to :edE earl# to rise makes a man &ealt&#E wealt&#E and wise.

Pro'er slee' is 'aramount to :eing in good &ealt&. 0ur :od# and mind are so ac%e during waking &ours

t&at we need to get 'ro'er rest e%er# nig&t. A good analog# for slee' is rec&arging t&e :aeries. 9ood

~ 95 ~



can :e considered energ# or G'otenal energ#E :ut it is more like fuel slee' is Gmore energiing. W&en

we get t&e 'ro'er restE we s&ould wake u' feeling refres&ed and energied. We s&ould get :etween ?

and ,, &ours of slee' for o'mal &ealt& and energ#. We s&ould also tr# our :est to slee' in &armon#

wit& t&e natural circadian r&#t&m for o'mal eXcienc#. P&#siologicall#E &umans are diurnal mammals

w&ic& means we are :iologicall# designed to :est :e awake and o'erate during da#lig&t &ours. Alt&oug&

our culture and modern world su''orts nig&t me ac%ies and Oo:sE we are not nocturnal creatures S

t&at;s w&# we cannot see in t&e dark.

We s&ould at least la# down in :ed soon :efore or aQer it gets dark outsideE and wake u' :efore or

during t&e sun rise. La#ing down wit& t&e sunset and waking u' wit& t&e sunrise is our natural r&#t&m

and t&is is anot&er e=am'le of t&e law of corres'ondence. &is is one reason w&# t&e ancients regarded

t&e sun as suc& a di%ine ent#. &e sun 'la#s a tremendous role on our li%es. We s&ould not wors&i' t&e

sunE :ut it;s :est to li%e in &armon# wit& it.

An a%erage me to go to :ed for t&e :est rest in around or ? P.M. In t&e 'ers'ec%e of our cultureE it

seems like an earl# :edme for a grown adult. rut&full#E modern societ# doesn;t su''ort 'ro'er slee'

'aerns and isn;t set2u' for going to :ed Gearl#. W&en one is done wit& sc&ool or work for t&e da# t&e#

usuall# want me to 'la# so t&e# go to :ed late. W&en we &a%e a %acaonE we t#'icall# slee' in. We are

a culture t&at creates insomnia. 5nnatural c#cles are 'romotedE rest is cricied and 'roducon is made

'riorit#. 0ur slee' suCers :ecause of it and t&erefore our %italit#E energ#E mood and o%erall &ealt& suCer.

Man# 'eo'le are c&ronicall# fagued :ecause of lack of slee'E and we :ecome de'endent u'on

smulantsE suc& as caCeineE to get us u' :ecause we don;t &a%e t&e dri%e ot&erwise. +aCeine makes us

more energec and t&at;s w&# man# com'anies oCer it freel# to em'lo#ees :ecause it means more

'roducon and 'ro>ts for t&em. +ollege students sta# u' all nig&t wit& a &ea%# work loadE consuming

mul'le coCees and energ# drinks Oust to get a good grade on an e=am. 3tar:ucks &as :ecome a &a%en

for college students and t&e working class alikeE :ut not wit&out a cost.

An# form of caCeine or smulant fries t&e adrenal glands and t&e ner%ous s#stem. &e c&emical makeu'

of a smulant is t&at of a neuroto=in. 3mulants signal t&e :od# to dis'la# signs of energ#E :ut t&is is an

illusion S t&e :od# is actuall# aem'ng to get rid of t&is neuroto=in as Ruick as 'ossi:le. &e adrenal

glands ood t&e :od# wit& adrenalineE w&ic& gi%es one t&e false im'ression t&at t&e# &a%e more energ#.

+aCeine is Oust like an# ot&er drug. All smulants &a%e a to=ic eCect on t&e :od# t&at one will e%entuall#

'a# for wit& '&#siological lowsE dose toleranceE wit&drawal s#m'toms like &eadac&es and cra%ingsE and

more. +aCeine addicon can also cause insomnia and c&ronic fague. Wit&out 'ro'er slee'E #our &ealt&

will failE e%en if #ou eat rig&tE e=erciseE and sta# &#drated. Lack of slee' will cause #our wa# of life to

:ecome unsustaina:le. 3lee'2de'ri%aon alone can create cra%ings and lea%e us wit& no energ# to >g&t

t&em. &e good news is smulants are not needed w&en one is geZng enoug& car:o&#drate caloriesE

waterE and slee'. "nerg# is o:tained drug free wit& t&e rig&t lifest#le.

Do #hat 8ou #ant

Man# 'eo'le claim to want certain t&ingsE :ut t&e# are actuall# tra''ed in an illusion of desire. It seems

fair to state t&at &a''iness is w&at e%er#:od# reall# wants. Howe%erE 'eo'le can get confused as to w&at

~ 96 ~



will make t&em &a''#. Peo'le oQen get distracted :# t&ings like drugsE se=E carsE mone#E and ot&er

material o:Oects. 9ame and social status is also somet&ing man# 'eo'le feel will :ring &a''iness. Like

t&ose searc&ing for &a''inessE most 'eo'le w&o do t&ings t&at infringe u'on t&e free will of anot&er are

stuck in an illusion. A :eing wit& a soul trul# wants lo%eE 'rogressE and &a''inessE :ut it is 'ossi:le for

&uman :eings to get lost. !oing w&at %iolates t&e free will of anot&er is wrong and will not lead an# soul

to w&at it reall# wantsE :ut 'eo'le fail to see t&is somemes. W&at #ouE t&e di%ine source e=isng wit&in

#ouE wants a:o%e all else is to :ene>t t&e 'rogress of all life and t&e 'lanet as a w&oleE including

#ourself. As stated :efore- Gskillful self2is&ness is ad%ocated :ecauseE wit&out knowing and acng u'ont&is 'rinci'leE no )wo*man would :e a:le to eXcientl# take 'art in contri:ung to aggregate 'rogress.

!oing w&at #ou want means diCerent t&ings for diCerent 'eo'leE :ecause we all are our own uniRue

indi%idualE wit& our own 'ur'osesE a:iliesE desniesE and our own free will. If one t&inks t&e# want to

consume addic%e drugs t&en t&e# &a%e t&e free will to act on t&at illusionE :ut it will onl# lead to

suCering.

!oing w&at #ou do not want to do will cause illnessE w&ic& is not in line wit& &ealt& and wealt&. !oing

w&at #ou do not want to do is gi%ing u' on e%er#t&ing #ou are it is :eing t&e %icmE w&ic& is t&e root of

addicon. It is gi%ing u' #our 'ower and t&e onl# t&ing #ou reall# &a%e control o%er- #our freedom ofc&oice. You can :e Gsuccessful w&en doing w&at #ou don;t not wantedE :ut it will not last in t&e long

run. If 'assion is not 'resentE t&en success is unsustaina:le. A common e=am'le of t&is would :e one

w&o gets a car loan to &a%e a %e&icle to tra%el to a Oo: )s*&e does not likeE to make a 'a#c&eckE to

connue 'a#ing for t&e car loanE to tra%el to t&e Oo: )s*&e does not like. It sounds sill#E :ut man# 'eo'le

are tra''ed in t&is form of ser%itude to a cause t&at t&e# &a%e no interest inE Oust :ecause t&e# wis& to

Gmake a li%ing. It;s an endless c#cle and it doesn;t &a%e to :e.

Life cannot :e enOo#ed and lasng &a''iness will not :e aained if one s'ends t&eir life working a Oo:

t&at t&e# do not like in order to make a li%ing or Gsur%i%e. 3tressE de'ressionE and lackluster will ensue if

t&is is t&e case. W&ate%er #ou want to :e and w&ate%er #ou wis& to doE #ou can :e it and s&ould do it.You will come across man# w&om will want to s&ut down #our dreams and tell #ou t&e#;re im'ossi:le.

It;s all a reecon of t&emE and man# mes t&ese o''osions are 'roOecons of t&eir own insecuries

and inadeRuac# onto #our am:ions. &e# ma# not e%en :e aware t&at t&e#;re doing t&is. 3omemes

t&is o''osion is a warning of dangers to comeE w&ic& is 'ro%ided out of good willE :ut if #ou are to trul#

:e freeE #ou can &a%e no fear and go aQer #our greatest am:ions. &e :liss and ecstas# of freedom are

onl# awarded to t&ose w&om take t&e necessar# risks. &e real risk lies in #our comfort and feeling of

securit#. No successful indi%idual :ecame w&o t&e# were and ac&ie%ed w&at t&e# &ad :ased on feeling

secure and 'rotected. It alwa#s takes a lea' of fait& to aain #our dreams. Kust remem:erE #ou are

e%er#t&ing #ou want to :eE and t&ere is not&ing to fear.

G&ose w&o surrender freedom for securit# will not &a%eE nor do t&e# deser%eE eit&er one. 2 4enOamin

9ranklin

3chool1s <ole in 3uccess

~ 97 ~



!o #ou need sc&ooling to manifest #our am:ions( No. You need knowledgeE fait&E and focus to aain

#our goalsE not instuonalied sc&ooling. It;s a social norm to t&ink t&at going to college and geZng a

degree is a 'rereRuisite for li%ing #our dream life. &ere is not&ing furt&er from t&e trut&. In factE t&e

mandator# sc&ooling from elementar# to &ig& sc&ool isn;t e%en needed to ful>ll #our 'ur'ose in lifeE :ut

I digress. &e to'ic of a G&ig&er educaon degree will :e focused u'on &ere.

A degree is literall# a 'iece of 'a'er t&at %aguel# informs :osses of w&at #ou know and can do. Howe%erEa degree tells no one #our ca'a:ilit# or 'otenal. Aaining a degree is :ased on 'assing a series of tests

t&ese linear reduconist tests mainl# focus u'on leQ2:rain knowledge. &e informaon needed to

com'lete t&ese tests is oQen sim'l# regurgitated and soon forgoen. &ese e=ams are designed to treat

#ou as a mac&ineE w&ic& does not su''ort crea%it# or imaginaon in t&e least. &ese tests are created

:# a so2called Gteac&er and$or G:oard of educaon to test #ou on w&at t&e# want #ou to know. &ere

is no room for growt& t&roug& t&is 'rocess of Gteac&ing. 3c&ool teac&es conformit# and su:ordinaon

to aut&orit#E :ecause t&is is w&at #ou must do to 'rogress and graduate. If #ou don;t conform t&en #ou

will fail and cannot aain t&is 'iece of 'a'er called a degree.

&e funn# t&ing a:out it all is- none of it is necessar# @nowledge is not limited to a sc&ool. @nowledgecan also :e found in :ooksE t&roug& &ands2on work and 'racceE and also t&roug& in>nite intelligenceE

w&ic& can :e accessed t&roug& mediaonE imaginaonE t&e et&erE natureE or e%en #our food. 4ut

s'eci>call#E o:Oec%e facts and anal#cal knowledge can :e learned t&oug& :ooks alone and t&en

a''lied in t&e real world. A 'rofessor or Gteac&er need not 'rogram #ou so #ou can gain t&e knowledge

#ou wis&. You can 'rogram #ourself. &is is not to sa# life teac&ersE eldersE and ade'ts aren;t ca'a:le of

teac&ing #ou. &is is onl# sa#ing t&at 'a#ing tuion and wasng me regurgitang informaon onl# to

conform to t&e will of an instuon and 'rofessors is not necessar# to go w&ere #ou want in life.

3ociet# and t&e 'eo'le t&at com'rise of it will constantl# tell #ou t&at #ou need to :e GRuali>ed to do

certain t&ings. W&en t&e# sa# Ruali>edE t&e#;re usuall# referring to a tle suc& as G!r. or a 'iece of'a'er suc& as a degree or cer>caon. 0ccasionall#E #ou need t&ese t&ings if #ou wis& to 'la# t&eir

game :ut if #ou wis& to %enture out and :e #our own :oss t&en no accreditaon from anot&er is

needed All #ou need is t&e 'assion for w&at #ou do and 'eo'le will res'ect or trust #ou wit& Oust t&at.

You will :e known :ecause of #our success stories and t&e word of mout& t&at comes wit& t&at. 3o man#

successful indi%iduals &a%e started out wit& no accreditaon from a G&ig&er educaon s#stem. Here;s a

small list of some to' entre'reneurs w&o;%e succeeded wit&out a college degree- A:ra&am LincolnE

Andrew +arnegieE 4enOamin 9ranklinE Nikola eslaE &omas "disonE Henr# 9ordE Ko&n !. Bockefeller 3r.E

Bic&ard 4ransonE Walt !isne#E 4ill <atesE 3te%e Ko:sE and Mark ̀ ucker:erg.

3ome of t&ese successful entre'reneurs were eit&er &ome2sc&ooled wit& no formal educaon and ne%er

went to 'u:lic or 'ri%ate sc&ool. 3ome of t&ese 'eo'le dro''ed out of collegeE dro''ed out of &ig&

sc&oolE and e%en dro''ed out of elementar# sc&ooling. You ma# ask &ow is it 'ossi:le for one to ac&ie%e

t&e le%el of success t&e# &a%e wit& no GRuali>caon. It;s reall# comical :ecause GRuali>caon from an

outside :od# is irrele%ant :ecause #ou &a%e t&e ca'a:ilit# to Rualif# #ourself. You do t&is wit&

knowledgeE 'assionE and determinaon. Peo'le will :egin to see #our lig&t and not e%en worr# a:out a

'iece of 'a'er or a tle. !id <and&i need a tle to lead t&e millions of 'eo'le &e led( !id Hitler need a

degree to launc& t&e &orrendous mo%ement &e led( Moral 'urit# asideE t&e :asis for w&at;s needed to

~ 98 ~



create or :e an inuence is a %ision and t&e 'assion necessar# to :ack it u' and :egin making t&at %ision

a realit#. &is was discussed in detail in t&e G+reate Your Bealit# c&a'ter.

Man# entre'reneurs %alue am:ionE c&arismaE and imaginaon more so t&an 'ure intellect. 3te%e Ko:s

was one of t&ese entre'reneurs. He would :ecome distraug&t w&en &e saw an em'lo#ee not

e=em'lif#ing t&e crea%it#E inno%aonE and 'assion &e felt would 'ro'el &is com'an#E GA''leE forward.

A com'an# suc& as GA''le needed em'lo#ees w&o didnJt Oust &a%e :ook smarts and could regurgitate

informaonE :ut were %isionariesE in order to reac& t&e le%el of success it now &as.

!ear readers- if #ou feel inadeRuate :ecause #ou do not &a%e an accredited tle or cer>caonE t&en

'lease dismiss suc& nonsensical t&oug&ts. If #ou do not wis& to go t&roug& t&e 'rocess of outward

Ruali>caonE t&en #ou must not stress t&is t&oug&t furt&er. You don;t need a degree to :e %alua:le.

.ollow 8our Passion

Passion can :e s#non#mous wit& 'ur'oseE dri%eE am:ionE and in>nite determinaon. I see 'assion as

an e%erlasng ame t&at :urns :rig&tl# wit&in a fewE :ut &as t&e 'otenal to :urn :rig&tl# wit&in all. IEt&e aut&orE &a%e iden>ed wit& t&e name GPassion :ecause life is not&ing wit&out an internal lig&t.

Passion is t&e >re t&at gi%es our life 'ur'ose and t&e 'ure will'ower to succeed. If #ou &a%e itE 'assion is

e='ressed into e%er#t&ing #ou do and create. It;s %er# nocea:le w&en 'eo'le act wit&out 'assion. &e#

do t&ings for no real reason of t&eir own. &e# are sla%es to t&e will of anot&er wit& no imaginaon.

&e# are like ro:ots or mec&anied mac&ines Oust e=isng to workE onl# t&e# &a%e feelings and desires

t&at are :eing neglected. A &uman w&o forsakes 'assion and t&e dri%e to create S t&eir &umanit# S

:ecomes a om:ie.

Passion alwa#s e=istsE :ut it e='resses itself in #ou more as #ou >nd #ourselfE w&ic& is a 'rocess. &is is

w&# m# >rst c&a'ter was a:out knowing e=actl# w&o #ou are. 5se w&ate%er met&ods #ou t&ink are :estand :e guided :# #our &eart and t&e uni%ersal signs of t&is 'rocess of self2knowledge. &ere is not&ing to

fear on t&e 'at& to >nding #ourself. You know e=actl# w&at it is #ou want to oCer to t&e world and w&#.

You must &a%e 'assionE :ecause t&e >re :urns :rig&t wit&in one w&om doesE for t&e# e=em'lif#

con>dence and courage in e='ressions. &e# know w&at t&eir ne=t 'lan of acon is and all it :ecomes is

a waing game to see w&en e%er#t&ing will trans'ire.

o follow #our 'assionE #ou &a%e to ulmatel# enOo# and :e &a''# wit& w&at #ou;re doing t&is is t&e

sim'lest wa# of 'uZng it. Ask #ourself w&at :rings #ou Oo#E and w&at makes #ou &a''#. Your answer is

#our 'assion. I wouldn;t sa# t&at 'assion is eRuated to &a''inessE :ut it is t&e strong force t&at dri%es us

to ac&ie%e &a''iness for us and for ot&ers. It;s not all sel>s&. You can :e 'assionate a:out feeding t&e&ungr#. It will :ring Oo# to t&e &ungr# and in return :ring Oo# to #ou. We must understandE t&oug&E t&at

no indi%idual is &ere to do e%er#t&ing it;s literall# im'ossi:le to ful>ll all roles in one lifemeE so

:ecoming aware of #our mission is 'aramount. You can &a%e mul'le 'assionsE and t&e# can c&angeE :ut

t&e :est t&ing to do is to feed t&e strongest one #ou &a%e wit& #our energ#. M# strongest 'assion at t&e

me of wring t&is :ook is to s'read t&e messages I;%e wrien in &ere to as man# 'eo'le as 'ossi:le. I

sincerel# want to know more trut&s and understand t&e :roader s'ectrum of realit#. &is will make me

~ 99 ~



&a''#E and I;m 'assionate a:out doing it :ecause it is 'aramount to making t&is world a :eer 'lace.

Passion is t&e care for 'rogress and lo%e.

Passion is not alwa#s eas#E it is not alwa#s funE and it is not alwa#s 'leasura:le. 4ut it will :ring #ou t&e

greatest imagina:le reward and t&en some. Wit& 'assion comes fruit. Li%e wit& 'assion and t&e fruit of

life will :e e='erienced. W&en 'assion isn;t 'resentE life will :e sour or :ier. Li%e wit& 'assion and t&e

sweetness will :e like no ot&er.

~ 100 ~



A0out the Author

N.W. PassionE also known sim'l# as GPassionE graduated from &ig&2sc&ool and com'leted o%er t&ree

#ears of G&ig&er educaon coursework :efore deciding to lea%e t&e uni%ersit# :e&ind. MaOors &a%e

:een- 're2'&armac#$c&emistr#E nursingE >nanceE and :usiness management. AQer lea%ing uni%ersit#E it

was decided t&at Passion s&ould take a :reakE return &ome and reect a:out w&at &e wanted to do wit&

&is life.

AQer almost si= mont&s of not knowingE Passion decided t&at &e wanted to write &is >rst :ookE w&ic&

&as :een in t&e works for nearl# a #ear. &is is Passion;s >rst maOor contri:uon of knowledge and

informaon to societ#E and t&e con>dence is &ig& t&at it will &el' man#. 9urt&er worksE suc& as :ooks

and arclesE ma# :e in t&e future for Passion. 9or nowE &e 'lans to focus on social media in order to

gat&er more su''ort and furt&er s'read &is message.

W&en t&is :ook is releasedE Passion will &a%e em:arked on a great life ad%enture and >nall# leQ &is

&ome state for o%er #ears to tra%el to &ailand. "='loring 3out&east Asia and tra%eling t&e world is

'art of t&e ne=t le%el of &is Oourne#. It is sure to include man# new e='eriences w&ic& will create future

work t&at is %er# e=cingE educaonalE and 'rofound.

PleaseE sta# in touc&.

~ 101 ~



Educational Inspirations and &ools to 3ucceed

&ruth and B(ccult 9nowledge

http://evolveconsciousness.org/

Mark Passio’s work (highly inspired my work): http://www.whatonearthishappening.com/

Natural Law Seminars:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1pka!b"#$

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=%&$'unic*

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=+,-a0a0w

Cosmic Abandonment Seminar (eplaining the human origins 2.3 theory in much more

detail): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiCnrn4#k$o

Dietary ' .itness Advice for a 4ealthy Lifestyle

Below are links to the 5ou3ube channels and website o6 + healthy li6estyle pioneers (7arley 8

9reelee):

https://www.youtube.com/user/durianriders

https://www.youtube.com/user/9reelea

http://www.,bananasaday.com/

!utrition calculator: https://cronometer.com/

Plant-based Doctors:

r. 3. Colin Campbell: http://www.thechinastudy.com/6oundation/tcolincampbell6oundation/

r. ;ichael reger: https://www.youtube.com/user/!utrition9actsrg

r. !eal 'arnard: http://www.nealbarnard.org/

r. ohn ;cougall: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-<064nwraw

~ 102 ~


http://www.whatonearthishappening.com/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1pkJaNbzLU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57UBuxnicOA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=204aGDVa3Vw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiCnrn6LkUo


https://www.youtube.com/user/Freelea

http://www.30bananasaday.com/

https://cronometer.com/

http://www.thechinastudy.com/foundation/t-colin-campbell-foundation/

https://www.youtube.com/user/NutritionFactsOrg

http://www.nealbarnard.org/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XVf36nwraw


http://www.whatonearthishappening.com/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1pkJaNbzLU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57UBuxnicOA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=204aGDVa3Vw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiCnrn6LkUo


https://www.youtube.com/user/Freelea

http://www.30bananasaday.com/

https://cronometer.com/

http://www.thechinastudy.com/foundation/t-colin-campbell-foundation/

https://www.youtube.com/user/NutritionFactsOrg

http://www.nealbarnard.org/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XVf36nwraw



r. e66 !ovick: http://www.e66novick.com/>/7ome.html

r. Caldwell 2sselstyn: http://www.dresselstyn.com

r. ;ichael laper: http://doctorklaper.com/about/

r. oug #isle: http://douglisle.com

Dr. Joel Fuhrman: h!:""www.#r$uhrman.%om"ask"#e$aul.as!&

@9orks ver nivesA plantbased 6ilm: http://www.6orksoverknives.com/

Bhysicians Committee 6or >esponsible ;edicine: www.pcrm.org

;egan .ilms? 3peeches? and Info

2arthlings 6ilm: http://earthlings.com/?pageDid=+

ary 5ouro6skyEs @'est Fpeech 5ou Gill 2ver 7ear:A http://tinyurl.com/kke-wvH

ary 9ranciones @Ghy 'e 0egan?A https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=>-,9IItn;$

1,1 >easons to o 0egan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-7cIJI7*5'e (now )ohin* h!s:""www.+ouu,e.%om"wa%h-/!D9%$eaure/+ouu.,e

*nimal >ights Fpeech: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kK;aetrI#<c

0egan it: www.vegankit.com

**B33: http://www.adaptt.org/veganism.html

Beace6ul #iving in6o: http://suprememastertv.com

e* o%ie+ i#eos: h!s:""www.+ouu,e.%om"user"shi#eo"i#eos

>estaurant directory: http://www.happycow.net

3he Gorld Beace iet (6ree downloadable .pd6): http://worldpeacediet.org

0egan international chain restaurant: http://www.lovinghut.com

Check out 0egan 9acebook groups 6or community

~ 103 ~

http://www.jeffnovick.com/RD/Home.html

http://www.dresselstyn.com/

http://www.doctorklaper.com/about

http://douglisle.com/

http://www.drfuhrman.com/ask/default.aspx

http://www.forksoverknives.com/

http://www.pcrm.org/

http://earthlings.com/?page_id=32

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R40FDqqtnMU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4HJcq8qHAY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqDPA9cGZGA&feature=youtu.be

http://www.vegankit.com/

http://www.adaptt.org/veganism.html

http://suprememastertv.com/

https://www.youtube.com/user/vshvideo/videos

http://www.happycow.net/

http://worldpeacediet.org/

http://www.jeffnovick.com/RD/Home.html

http://www.dresselstyn.com/

http://www.doctorklaper.com/about

http://douglisle.com/

http://www.drfuhrman.com/ask/default.aspx

http://www.forksoverknives.com/

http://www.pcrm.org/

http://earthlings.com/?page_id=32

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R40FDqqtnMU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4HJcq8qHAY

http://www.vegankit.com/

http://www.adaptt.org/veganism.html

http://suprememastertv.com/

https://www.youtube.com/user/vshvideo/videos

http://www.happycow.net/

http://worldpeacediet.org/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqDPA9cGZGA&feature=youtu.be



)i0liography

rigins:

http://www.scienti6icamerican.com/article/gravitywavescmbbmodepolari"ation/

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/+,1,/,1/1,,1,&1-H,H.htm

http://www.nature.com/nature/ournal/v-4-/n&+J&/6ull/-4-4+a.html

http://www.harunyahya.com/en/'ooks/J1+4/theskullsthatdemolishdarwin/chapter/%1,H

http://www.crystalinks.com/sumergods.html

!utrition and iet:

http://acn.nutrition.org/content/J%/4/144&.6ull

http://ournals.cambridge.org/download.php?6ile=L+9B!F

L+9B!F&+DC2-L+9F,,+H44%11,,+4<a.pd68code=eb1--4H,%ee4-+&4+JeJ%16-&6-,Jcb6

http://care.diabetesournals.org/content/+H/J/1&&&.6ull.pd6Mhtml

http://ournals.cambridge.org/download.php?6ile=L+9B7!

L+9B7!%D,%L+9F14JHJ,,,+,,,J&a.pd68code=6466a%%aeJ6+,de4e%6b-d6e&e+a-,6,

https://news.uns.purdue.edu/html-ever/+,,%/,%,1+-.'ressan.osmotin.html

http://care.diabetesournals.org/content//1/-.6ull

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1&J,%HJ?dopt=*bstract

http://ournals.cambridge.org/download.php?6ile=L+9'!

L+9'!-4D,+L+9F,,,&11-%J1,,1,HJa.pd68code=%4d%1J1ecda,c1dJ-a%%e4bH+e61

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/F,,,+H1-HH4,,&4,4

http://care.diabetesournals.org/content/+H/1,/+1.6ull.pd6Mhtml

http://nutrition6acts.org/+,11/,H/,J/howmuchpusisthereinmilk/

http://www.allcreatures.org/6act/6act+,,J,%11.pd6

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/J1%--&

http://www.news.harvard.edu/ga"ette/+,,4/1+.,&/11dairy.html

http://www.rense.com/general+4/truth.htm

http://nutrition6acts.org/+,1/,+/1-/animalproteinandig61/

http://www.nature.com/io/ournal/v+/n11/pd6/,J,111,a.pd6?origin=publicationDdetail

http://acn.nutrition.org/content/J%/4/144&.6ull

http://cebp.aacrournals.org/content/11/11/1--1.6ull.pd6Mhtml

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/6actsheets/6s1,/en/

~ 104 ~

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/gravity-waves-cmb-b-mode-polarization/

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100107143909.htm

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v464/n7287/full/464362a.html

http://www.harunyahya.com/en/Books/8126/the-skulls-that-demolish-darwin/chapter/5109


http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/85/6/1667.full

http://journals.cambridge.org/download.php?file=%2FPNS%2FPNS72_OCE4%2FS002966511300236Xa.pdf&code=eb1446905ee6427628e851f47f408cbf


http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/29/8/1777.full.pdf+html

http://journals.cambridge.org/download.php?file=%2FPHN%2FPHN5_05%2FS1368980002000873a.pdf&code=f6ffa55ae8f20de6e5fb4dfe7e2a40f0


https://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/2005/050124.Bressan.osmotin.html

http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/33/1/43.full

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17805983?dopt=Abstract

http://journals.cambridge.org/download.php?file=/BJN/BJN46_02/S0007114581001098a.pdf&code=56d5181e3cda303c1d84a553e6b92ef1


http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914996007606


http://nutritionfacts.org/2011/09/08/how-much-pus-is-there-in-milk/

http://www.all-creatures.org/fact/fact-20080511.pdf

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8154473

http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/2006/12.07/11-dairy.html

http://www.rense.com/general26/truth.htm

http://nutritionfacts.org/2013/02/14/animal-protein-and-igf-1/

http://www.nature.com/ijo/journal/v23/n11/pdf/0801110a.pdf?origin=publication_detail


http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/11/11/1441.full.pdf+html

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/gravity-waves-cmb-b-mode-polarization/

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100107143909.htm

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v464/n7287/full/464362a.html

http://www.harunyahya.com/en/Books/8126/the-skulls-that-demolish-darwin/chapter/5109








https://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/2005/050124.Bressan.osmotin.html

http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/33/1/43.full




http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914996007606


http://nutritionfacts.org/2011/09/08/how-much-pus-is-there-in-milk/

http://www.all-creatures.org/fact/fact-20080511.pdf


http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/2006/12.07/11-dairy.html

http://www.rense.com/general26/truth.htm

http://nutritionfacts.org/2013/02/14/animal-protein-and-igf-1/

http://www.nature.com/ijo/journal/v23/n11/pdf/0801110a.pdf?origin=publication_detail


http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/11/11/1441.full.pdf+html

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/



http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/+1-J1%,1

http://circ.ahaournals.org/content/1,%/+%/e1H&.6ull

http://www.vrg.org/nutrition/+,,HD**DpositionDpaper.pd6

http://www.6ao.org/docrep/,,-/y+J,He/y+J,He,J.htm

http://circ.ahaournals.org/content/1,-/1%/1J4H.abstract?

ikey=H-%466da,+ded,-4HaH&+-eJ+ca-+HcdH4HH8keytype+=t6Dipsecsha

http://enews.tu6ts.edu/stories/1+4/+,,1/,H/1,/etting2nough'1+

http://acn.nutrition.org/content/&-/4/&,&.6ull

http://sportsmedicine.about.com/od/sportsnutrition/a/Carbohydrates.htm

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4&%%144?dopt=*bstract

https://www.drmcdougall.com/misc/+,,Hnl/mar/passionate.pd6

http://www.cema6e.com.br/lipogenesisL+,andL+,energyL+,balance.pd6

http://science.howstu66works.com/li6e/cellularmicroscopic/6atcell+.htm

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1,4%HJ1

http://badassu.net/1,,scienti6icreasonstonoteatmeat/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nnpt%"5N

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-!kl>O1ctN

2nvironment:

http://www.nrdc.org/water/pollution/66arms.asp

http:/www.bbc/com/6uture/story/+,1+,H+,arewerunningouto66ish

http://www.worldpreservation6oundation.org/ownloads/>educingFhorter#ivedClimate9orcers3

hroughietaryChange.pd6

6tp://6tp.6ao.org/docrep/6ao/,1,/*,&,12/*,&,12,,.pd6

h // h i / / d6 /6 /h h i 6 i d i li d i l


http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/105/25/e197.full

http://www.vrg.org/nutrition/2009_ADA_position_paper.pdf

http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/y2809e/y2809e08.htm

http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/104/15/1869.abstract?ijkey=9456ffda02ded0469a97243e83332ca429cd9699&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha


http://enews.tufts.edu/stories/1263/2001/09/10/GettingEnoughB12




https://www.drmcdougall.com/misc/2009nl/mar/passionate.pdf

http://www.cemafe.com.br/lipogenesis%20and%20energy%20balance.pdf

http://science.howstuffworks.com/life/cellular-microscopic/fat-cell2.htm


http://badassu.net/100-scientific-reasons-to-not-eat-meat/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Qnpjt5KzYQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NjklRZ1ctQ

http://www.nrdc.org/water/pollution/ffarms.asp

http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20120920-are-we-running-out-of-fish

http://www.worldpreservationfoundation.org/Downloads/ReducingShorterLivedClimateForcersThroughDietaryChange.pdf


ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/A0701E/A0701E00.pdf

http://www.humanesociety.org/assets/pdfs/farm/hsus-the-impact-of-industrialized-animal-agriculture-on-the-environment.pdf


http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/105/25/e197.full

http://www.vrg.org/nutrition/2009_ADA_position_paper.pdf

http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/y2809e/y2809e08.htm



http://enews.tufts.edu/stories/1263/2001/09/10/GettingEnoughB12




https://www.drmcdougall.com/misc/2009nl/mar/passionate.pdf

http://www.cemafe.com.br/lipogenesis%20and%20energy%20balance.pdf




ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/A0701E/A0701E00.pdf

http://www.humanesociety.org/assets/pdfs/farm/hsus-the-impact-of-industrialized-animal-agriculture-on-the-environment.pdf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Qnpjt5KzYQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NjklRZ1ctQ

http://science.howstuffworks.com/life/cellular-microscopic/fat-cell2.htm

http://badassu.net/100-scientific-reasons-to-not-eat-meat/

http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20120920-are-we-running-out-of-fish

http://www.nrdc.org/water/pollution/ffarms.asp

passion and fruit.pdf

Documents