Partisan Politics Emerge During Washington’s Presidency

WASHINGTON & CONGRESS, 1789 - 1796

George Washington didn’t really want for this to happen. In his Cabinet, strong personalities and men of ability were brought together. Jeff erson and Hamilton were frequently on the opposite side of the issues. Yet, all of the men were patriot Americans. Recognizing this, George Washington tried to project a public image of the disinterested statesman. Privately, he appears to have agreed with Alexander Hamilton more frequently than with Thomas Jeff erson.

A NOTE ON GEORGE WASHINGTON

Thomas Jeff erson and Alexander Hamilton ended up on the opposite side of many crucial debates during Washington’s Presidency, including:

The Bill of Rights DebateThe Assumption of the National Debt and

Redemption of Bonds. Powers of the Government under the Constitution The National BankWho Should Rule? Who, exactly, are “We the

People?” Foreign Policy OptionsThe Alien and Sedition Acts – in 1798, under John

Adams

REASONS FOR THE DIVIDE

Thomas Jeff erson & the Republicans

Jeff erson and Madison were strong supporters of the Bill of Rights, believing they were essential to (1) preserve the rights of the people and (2) appease the Antifederalists who had resigned themselves to the Constitution in 1788.

Alexander Hamilton & the Federalists

Alexander Hamilton and his Federalists were unconvinced that any rights would be better preserved by placing them in writing. Overall, they believed that the rights were necessary and proper, but they also thought that this went without saying.

THE BILL OF RIGHTS

Jeff erson, Madison, & the Republicans

Both men, but especially James Madison, saw through Alexander Hamilton’s design. They knew that if the national government assumed all of the states’ debts, that this would give the federal government a compelling reason to tax the states – after all, they had to repay England, France, and Holland for helping to grant us our independence.

Alexander Hamilton & the Federalists

Hamilton knew exactly what he was doing when he assumed the debt of each of the states in 1789. By taking the burden of debt off of the states who still owed money to England, France, Holland or Spain, he was justifying the national government’s right to tax its subjects going forward.

THE ASSUMPTION OF THE NATION DEBT BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

Madison: OPPOSED

Paying full price on the Congress’ paper money bills was going to reward the money speculators who had purchased the bonds when no one believed that the nation would win the confl ict.

Hamilton: IN FAVOR

Hamilton realized that by paying full price on the government bonds, the aristocratic, wealthy, elite would come to support the government. If a few of the “lower sort” felt they were losing power, so be it.

THE REDEMPTION OF BONDS

Jeffersonian Republicans

Jeff erson feared that the national government would attempt to take too much power. He therefore advocated a “strict constructionist” view of the Constitution. If the Constitution did not specifi cally grant the government the power to take an action, they could not do so.

Hamiltonian Federalists

Alexander Hamilton was much more covetous of power – for himself and for the government. He believed that if something was not strictly forbidden by the Constitution, that the government could take action on it’s own. He believed in the “implied powers” within the Constitution.

POWERS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION

Alexander Hamilton viewed the National Bank as a way to encourage cooperation between the wealthy, elite members of society and the government. Since this power was not specifi cally enumerated in the Constitution, Jeff erson viewed the National Bank as a usurpation of power and mistrusted Alexander Hamilton’s motives – as always…

THE NATIONAL BANK

Jeffersonian Republicans

Jeff erson believed in the virtue of an agrarian republic. He believed that small farmers – educated landowners – would be the most virtuous men to build a nation with. He wanted to expand the democracy accordingly.

Hamiltonian Federalists

Alexander Hamilton believed in a nation of industry and merchant traders. His thought was that a productive society would be more profi table and infl uential on the world stage. Hamilton believed in republicanism, but would have restricted the vote to property owners.

WHO SHOULD RULE?

Jeffersonian Republicans

Jeff erson was a Francophile, meaning that he was in favor of strong diplomatic ties with France.

This was generally a popular view, since France had helped the United States gain its independence.

Hamiltonian Federalists

Hamilton was an Anglophile, meaning that he was in favor of strong diplomatic ties with England.

This was not as popular a view, since Americans had recently fought to sever ties with England.

FOREIGN POLICY CHOICES

Jeffersonian Republicans

Jeff erson and Madison viewed the Alien and Sedition Acts as obviously unconstitutional measures which limited freedom of speech and freedom of the press, and put the liberty of the people at risk. The two men penned the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions in protest, claiming that states had the right to declare Congressional acts unconstitutional on their own.

Hamiltonian Federalists

Hamilton agreed with John Adams that the Alien and Sedition acts were necessary infringements of the people’s rights in order to preserve the gains of the revolution. Hamilton viewed the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions as a danger to the supremacy of the federal government, since they advocated nullifi cation and interposition.

THE ALIEN AND SEDITION ACTS