participation. collective intelligence & participation.trendslab 2017. shared

Collective Intelligence & Participation

huntingmammoths.com [email protected]


huntingmammoths.com

Josep Mª Monguet2017 Elisava



Management

Design

Education

Crowdfunding

Co-creation

Social netsMOOC’s

e-Democracy

TechnologyDo it yourself

Participation Collaborative

design

CrowdsourcingCollaborative

economy

Shared

knowledge

Prediction market

Livinglabs

Collective

action

Collective data

Communication

Politics



New mental framework

+ Participation+ Efficiency



0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020

“Co-creation” GS

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020

"Collective Intelligence" GS

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020

“Health participation” GS

Domains of Participation



Collaboration

Coproduction of services

Participation

More engagementMore results

Marginality

Heath domain

Involvement in:- Decision making- Service reception

Innovation in - Professional practice - Service delivery

Offer / Professionals Demand / Consumers



Consensus

Diversity

Co-creation

Decision making

Prediction

Co-learning

Participation



Cultures & sensitivities integrated in the group?

Tools the group has to perform

Learning relationship

within the group?

Collective Intelligence Environment

Participation

Consensus

DiversityCo-learning



Sharing what’ could happen?

Reasoning about priorities and what to do

Acting together

Applying Collective Intelligence

Participation

Co-creation

Decision making

Prediction



Participation

Consensus


Tools the group has to perform




Condorcet’s jury theorem

Consensus

Value of the group



Consensus

Capture experts opinion probability & intensity of enemy attacks.

Other experts anonymously giving feedback.

Process was repeated several times (Rounds) until a consensus emerged.

Delphi method

Value of the group



Consensus

Case/ Critical laboratory results



Consensus

Specialities

Case/ Critical laboratory results



Consensus


Participation


Cultures & sensitivities integrated in the group?



Diversity

Each 10% +in ethnical and racial

diversity in an executive

senior team

0,8% + Profits of the company

What does it really matter in group intelligence?



+ Sociodiversity g + Knowledge, ideas & resilience

Past Present Future

Control Centrality Majorities Collective intelligence

Complexity Low Relevant Growing non-stop

DiversityPerceived as a problem

Accepted A lot will be needed

Participation Concession Empowerment Science of citizens

Threat Change Filters Lack of values

Diversity



Diversitat

http://team.onsanity.com

Individual profiles can be mixed to

see the profile of the group

http://onsanity.com/project-view/team-

equilibrium-management/

About Team equilibrium

Team equilibrium

Measuring “team intelligence“

http://team.onsanity.com/index.php

http://team.onsanity.com/index.php

http://team.onsanity.com/

http://onsanity.com/project-view/team-equilibrium-management/

http://onsanity.com/project-view/team-equilibrium-management/



Participation

Consensus



Learning relationship

within the group?



Frequency of knowledge doubling?

co-Learning

1900 1950 2000

10025

1

Knowledge is becoming a highly complex flux.




How this explosion

can be managed ?

co-Learning

Frequency of knowledge doubling?



co-Learning

Real time Big data: Unconscious consensus




co-Learning

Consensus as a pedagogical resource




Applying participation engineering

Participation

Co-creation

Decision making

Prediction

Sharing what’ could happen?



Aggregate the opinion of

carefully selected experts to

identify credible scenarios

The future can be one of the diverse options that we can imagine, assess and debate.

Prediction

Joining visions, future can be partially seen.



Prediction market

Investing money (simulated) in the probability that an event occurs is an incentive to make more accurate predictions.

Prediction

Joining visions, future can be partially seen.



Participation

Co-creation

Decision making

Prediction

Reasoning about priorities and what to do




Shared leadership:

Decisions

If so, we have the right to participate

Are we affected by the decision?

+ Values and transparency- Power and status quo

Right and science of deciding



Ars electionis. Llull

Voting by coupelsBinary exhaustive comparisons

Couples = n*(n-1) / 2

Decisions




Selecting some ideas from thousands.

Decisions




Decisions

Open

marketplace

for medical

diagnosis

One error in

every two

decisions




Participation

Co-creation

Decision making

Prediction Acting together




co-Creation

Consumers: from YES or NO to Co-creation



“Los catalanes hacen cosas”*

I feel creative

1980 2010

20%

60%

co-Creation

2020

*”Catalans do things”




Purchase decisions based on

consensus among groups of

individuals with different roles.

Selling by consensus

co-Creation




Management

Design

Education

DomainsCrowdfunding

Co-creation

Social netsMOOC’s

e-Democracy

TechnologyDo it yourself

Collaborative

design

CrowdsourcingCollaborative

economy

Shared

knowledge

Prediction market

Livinglabs

Collective

action

Collective data

Communication

Politics

Innovation



BarriersParticipation

Consensus

Diversity

Co-creation

Decision making

Prediction

Co-learning

Are managers willing to share control?

Are users prepared and motivated?

Is society overcoming consumerism?

Are organizations

moving towards new

paradigms ?

Are we conscious

about other people's interests?

Does we actually

want to take control

of our future?