parish plan tabulated results

48
Q1. How many people in each of these age groups live in your household? 236 100.0% 142 60.2% 34 14.4% 41 17.4% 18 7.6% 1 .4% 176 74.6% 40 16.9% 15 6.4% 4 1.7% 1 .4% 193 81.8% 22 9.3% 20 8.5% 1 .4% 84 35.6% 47 19.9% 100 42.4% 5 2.1% 155 65.7% 35 14.8% 41 17.4% 5 2.1% Base: All respondents None/not answered 1 2 3 4 Under 18 None/not answered 1 2 3 Ticked but no number given Between 18 and 25 None/not answered 1 2 Ticked but no number given Between 26 and 35 None/not answered 1 2 Ticked but no number given Between 36 and 59 None/not answered 1 2 Ticked but no number given Over 60 Num % Base: All respondents J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey Results Cross tabulations Research & Marketing Plus April 2007 Page 1

Upload: tony-lacey

Post on 29-Mar-2016

223 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Cross tabulated results from parish plan responses

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q1. How many people in each of these age groups live in your household?

236 100.0%

142 60.2%

34 14.4%

41 17.4%

18 7.6%

1 .4%

176 74.6%

40 16.9%

15 6.4%

4 1.7%

1 .4%

193 81.8%

22 9.3%

20 8.5%

1 .4%

84 35.6%

47 19.9%

100 42.4%

5 2.1%

155 65.7%

35 14.8%

41 17.4%

5 2.1%

Base: All respondents

None/not answered

1

2

3

4

Under 18

None/not answered

1

2

3

Ticked but no number given

Between 18 and 25

None/not answered

1

2

Ticked but no number given

Between 26 and 35

None/not answered

1

2

Ticked but no number given

Between 36 and 59

None/not answered

1

2

Ticked but no number given

Over 60

Num %

Base: Allrespondents

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 1

Page 2: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q2. How many people in your household...?

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0%

59 25.0% 53 37.3% 3 8.8% 1 2.4% 2 11.1% 0 .0% 58 33.0% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0%

66 28.0% 32 22.5% 8 23.5% 15 36.6% 11 61.1% 0 .0% 55 31.3% 11 27.5% 0 .0% 0 .0%

76 32.2% 30 21.1% 18 52.9% 22 53.7% 5 27.8% 1 100.0% 57 32.4% 17 42.5% 2 13.3% 0 .0%

24 10.2% 18 12.7% 4 11.8% 2 4.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 10 25.0% 10 66.7% 3 75.0%

5 2.1% 3 2.1% 1 2.9% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.5% 3 20.0% 1 25.0%

6 2.5% 6 4.2% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 5 2.8% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

214 90.7% 132 93.0% 29 85.3% 37 90.2% 15 83.3% 1 100.0% 165 93.8% 33 82.5% 13 86.7% 2 50.0%

21 8.9% 10 7.0% 4 11.8% 4 9.8% 3 16.7% 0 .0% 11 6.3% 6 15.0% 2 13.3% 2 50.0%

1 .4% 0 .0% 1 2.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0%

207 87.7% 128 90.1% 28 82.4% 37 90.2% 13 72.2% 1 100.0% 155 88.1% 34 85.0% 13 86.7% 4 100.0%

24 10.2% 12 8.5% 5 14.7% 4 9.8% 3 16.7% 0 .0% 17 9.7% 5 12.5% 2 13.3% 0 .0%

5 2.1% 2 1.4% 1 2.9% 0 .0% 2 11.1% 0 .0% 4 2.3% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0%

146 61.9% 74 52.1% 29 85.3% 30 73.2% 12 66.7% 1 100.0% 92 52.3% 35 87.5% 14 93.3% 4 100.0%

49 20.8% 27 19.0% 5 14.7% 11 26.8% 6 33.3% 0 .0% 44 25.0% 4 10.0% 1 6.7% 0 .0%

32 13.6% 32 22.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 31 17.6% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0%

3 1.3% 3 2.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 1.7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

6 2.5% 6 4.2% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 6 3.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

140 59.3% 120 84.5% 8 23.5% 8 19.5% 4 22.2% 0 .0% 120 68.2% 14 35.0% 5 33.3% 0 .0%

47 19.9% 20 14.1% 20 58.8% 7 17.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 18 10.2% 18 45.0% 9 60.0% 2 50.0%

34 14.4% 2 1.4% 6 17.6% 23 56.1% 3 16.7% 0 .0% 26 14.8% 8 20.0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

12 5.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.4% 11 61.1% 0 .0% 11 6.3% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 25.0%

3 1.3% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 4.9% 0 .0% 1 100.0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 1 6.7% 1 25.0%

140 59.3% 120 84.5% 8 23.5% 8 19.5% 4 22.2% 0 .0% 120 68.2% 14 35.0% 5 33.3% 0 .0%

47 19.9% 20 14.1% 20 58.8% 7 17.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 18 10.2% 18 45.0% 9 60.0% 2 50.0%

34 14.4% 2 1.4% 6 17.6% 23 56.1% 3 16.7% 0 .0% 26 14.8% 8 20.0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

12 5.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.4% 11 61.1% 0 .0% 11 6.3% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 25.0%

3 1.3% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 4.9% 0 .0% 1 100.0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 1 6.7% 1 25.0%

Base: All respondents

None/not answered

1

2

3

4

Ticked but no number given

Work locally (inNorfolk)

None/not answered

1

2

Work further afield

None/not answered

1

2

Work from home

None/not answered

1

2

3

Ticked but no number given

Do not do any paidwork

None/not answered

1

2

3

4

None/not answered

1

2

3

4

At school or full-timeeducation

Num %

Base: Allrespondents

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

4

Under 18

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 2

Page 3: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q2. How many people in your household...?

1 100.0% 193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0%

0 .0% 56 29.0% 2 9.1% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 43 51.2% 14 29.8% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 8 5.2%

0 .0% 53 27.5% 3 13.6% 10 50.0% 0 .0% 24 28.6% 14 29.8% 27 27.0% 1 20.0% 44 28.4%

0 .0% 51 26.4% 16 72.7% 9 45.0% 0 .0% 13 15.5% 17 36.2% 45 45.0% 1 20.0% 71 45.8%

0 .0% 23 11.9% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 2.4% 1 2.1% 21 21.0% 0 .0% 23 14.8%

0 .0% 5 2.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 5 5.0% 0 .0% 5 3.2%

1 100.0% 5 2.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 100.0% 2 2.4% 1 2.1% 0 .0% 3 60.0% 4 2.6%

1 100.0% 176 91.2% 19 86.4% 18 90.0% 1 100.0% 80 95.2% 39 83.0% 90 90.0% 5 100.0% 136 87.7%

0 .0% 16 8.3% 3 13.6% 2 10.0% 0 .0% 4 4.8% 7 14.9% 10 10.0% 0 .0% 19 12.3%

0 .0% 1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 100.0% 172 89.1% 18 81.8% 16 80.0% 1 100.0% 76 90.5% 39 83.0% 88 88.0% 4 80.0% 135 87.1%

0 .0% 16 8.3% 4 18.2% 4 20.0% 0 .0% 8 9.5% 6 12.8% 9 9.0% 1 20.0% 17 11.0%

0 .0% 5 2.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 4.3% 3 3.0% 0 .0% 3 1.9%

1 100.0% 111 57.5% 22 100.0% 12 60.0% 1 100.0% 27 32.1% 33 70.2% 81 81.0% 5 100.0% 128 82.6%

0 .0% 41 21.2% 0 .0% 8 40.0% 0 .0% 25 29.8% 7 14.9% 17 17.0% 0 .0% 27 17.4%

0 .0% 32 16.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 26 31.0% 6 12.8% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 3 1.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.1% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 6 3.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 6 7.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 100.0% 119 61.7% 12 54.5% 8 40.0% 1 100.0% 68 81.0% 28 59.6% 41 41.0% 3 60.0% 66 42.6%

0 .0% 41 21.2% 0 .0% 6 30.0% 0 .0% 7 8.3% 9 19.1% 31 31.0% 0 .0% 41 26.5%

0 .0% 18 9.3% 10 45.5% 6 30.0% 0 .0% 9 10.7% 10 21.3% 14 14.0% 1 20.0% 33 21.3%

0 .0% 12 6.2% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 11 11.0% 1 20.0% 12 7.7%

0 .0% 3 1.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 3.0% 0 .0% 3 1.9%

1 100.0% 119 61.7% 12 54.5% 8 40.0% 1 100.0% 68 81.0% 28 59.6% 41 41.0% 3 60.0% 66 42.6%

0 .0% 41 21.2% 0 .0% 6 30.0% 0 .0% 7 8.3% 9 19.1% 31 31.0% 0 .0% 41 26.5%

0 .0% 18 9.3% 10 45.5% 6 30.0% 0 .0% 9 10.7% 10 21.3% 14 14.0% 1 20.0% 33 21.3%

0 .0% 12 6.2% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 11 11.0% 1 20.0% 12 7.7%

0 .0% 3 1.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 3.0% 0 .0% 3 1.9%

Base: All respondents

None/not answered

1

2

3

4

Ticked but no number given

Work locally (inNorfolk)

None/not answered

1

2

Work further afield

None/not answered

1

2

Work from home

None/not answered

1

2

3

Ticked but no number given

Do not do any paidwork

None/not answered

1

2

3

4

None/not answered

1

2

3

4

At school or full-timeeducation

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and25

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

Num %

None/notanswered

Over 60

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 3

Page 4: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q2. How many people in your household...?

35 100.0% 41 100.0% 5 100.0%

18 51.4% 28 68.3% 5 100.0%

11 31.4% 11 26.8% 0 .0%

4 11.4% 1 2.4% 0 .0%

0 .0% 1 2.4% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

2 5.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

32 91.4% 41 100.0% 5 100.0%

2 5.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 2.9% 0 .0% 0 .0%

26 74.3% 41 100.0% 5 100.0%

7 20.0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

2 5.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

15 42.9% 3 7.3% 0 .0%

13 37.1% 9 22.0% 0 .0%

6 17.1% 25 61.0% 1 20.0%

0 .0% 3 7.3% 0 .0%

1 2.9% 1 2.4% 4 80.0%

28 80.0% 41 100.0% 5 100.0%

6 17.1% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 2.9% 0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

28 80.0% 41 100.0% 5 100.0%

6 17.1% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 2.9% 0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

None/not answered

1

2

3

4

Ticked but no number given

Work locally (inNorfolk)

None/not answered

1

2

Work further afield

None/not answered

1

2

Work from home

None/not answered

1

2

3

Ticked but no number given

Do not do any paidwork

None/not answered

1

2

3

4

None/not answered

1

2

3

4

At school or full-timeeducation

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 4

Page 5: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - EDUCATION

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

140 59.3% 59 41.5% 24 70.6% 39 95.1% 17 94.4% 1 100.0% 109 61.9% 20 50.0% 7 46.7% 3 75.0% 1 100.0%

57 24.2% 45 31.7% 9 26.5% 2 4.9% 1 5.6% 0 .0% 34 19.3% 15 37.5% 7 46.7% 1 25.0% 0 .0%

20 8.5% 20 14.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 18 10.2% 1 2.5% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

4 1.7% 3 2.1% 1 2.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 1.1% 2 5.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

15 6.4% 15 10.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 13 7.4% 2 5.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

Base: Allrespondents

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

4

Under 18

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - EDUCATION

193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0% 35 100.0%

102 52.8% 19 86.4% 19 95.0% 0 .0% 50 59.5% 35 74.5% 52 52.0% 3 60.0% 100 64.5% 17 48.6%

55 28.5% 0 .0% 1 5.0% 1 100.0% 16 19.0% 7 14.9% 33 33.0% 1 20.0% 36 23.2% 9 25.7%

19 9.8% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 7 8.3% 2 4.3% 10 10.0% 1 20.0% 12 7.7% 1 2.9%

3 1.6% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 2.4% 0 .0% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 2 1.3% 0 .0%

14 7.3% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 9 10.7% 3 6.4% 3 3.0% 0 .0% 5 3.2% 8 22.9%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Over 60

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 5

Page 6: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - EDUCATION

41 100.0% 5 100.0%

20 48.8% 3 60.0%

12 29.3% 0 .0%

6 14.6% 1 20.0%

2 4.9% 0 .0%

1 2.4% 1 20.0%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - RECYCLING

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

124 52.5% 69 48.6% 19 55.9% 19 46.3% 16 88.9% 1 100.0% 98 55.7% 14 35.0% 11 73.3% 0 .0% 1 100.0%

96 40.7% 61 43.0% 14 41.2% 19 46.3% 2 11.1% 0 .0% 66 37.5% 23 57.5% 3 20.0% 4 100.0% 0 .0%

7 3.0% 5 3.5% 1 2.9% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 5 2.8% 2 5.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

9 3.8% 7 4.9% 0 .0% 2 4.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 7 4.0% 1 2.5% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not answered

Num %

Base: Allrespondents

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

4

Under 18

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 6

Page 7: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - RECYCLING

193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0% 35 100.0%

97 50.3% 13 59.1% 14 70.0% 0 .0% 40 47.6% 29 61.7% 52 52.0% 3 60.0% 82 52.9% 22 62.9%

84 43.5% 7 31.8% 5 25.0% 0 .0% 35 41.7% 17 36.2% 42 42.0% 2 40.0% 63 40.6% 11 31.4%

5 2.6% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 1 100.0% 3 3.6% 0 .0% 4 4.0% 0 .0% 5 3.2% 0 .0%

7 3.6% 1 4.5% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 6 7.1% 1 2.1% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 5 3.2% 2 5.7%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not answered

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Over 60

(cont.)

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - RECYCLING

41 100.0% 5 100.0%

17 41.5% 3 60.0%

20 48.8% 2 40.0%

2 4.9% 0 .0%

2 4.9% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not answered

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 7

Page 8: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - OPEN SPACES

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

121 51.3% 70 49.3% 22 64.7% 20 48.8% 8 44.4% 1 100.0% 87 49.4% 21 52.5% 12 80.0% 0 .0% 1 100.0%

90 38.1% 57 40.1% 8 23.5% 17 41.5% 8 44.4% 0 .0% 69 39.2% 16 40.0% 2 13.3% 3 75.0% 0 .0%

11 4.7% 6 4.2% 3 8.8% 1 2.4% 1 5.6% 0 .0% 8 4.5% 1 2.5% 1 6.7% 1 25.0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

13 5.5% 8 5.6% 1 2.9% 3 7.3% 1 5.6% 0 .0% 11 6.3% 2 5.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

Base: Allrespondents

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

4

Under 18

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - OPEN SPACES

193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0% 35 100.0%

99 51.3% 10 45.5% 12 60.0% 0 .0% 43 51.2% 22 46.8% 53 53.0% 3 60.0% 78 50.3% 20 57.1%

76 39.4% 9 40.9% 5 25.0% 0 .0% 28 33.3% 19 40.4% 41 41.0% 2 40.0% 63 40.6% 10 28.6%

8 4.1% 0 .0% 2 10.0% 1 100.0% 4 4.8% 3 6.4% 4 4.0% 0 .0% 9 5.8% 1 2.9%

0 .0% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

10 5.2% 2 9.1% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 8 9.5% 3 6.4% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 5 3.2% 4 11.4%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Over 60

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 8

Page 9: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - OPEN SPACES

41 100.0% 5 100.0%

21 51.2% 2 40.0%

15 36.6% 2 40.0%

1 2.4% 0 .0%

1 2.4% 0 .0%

3 7.3% 1 20.0%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - DESIGN OF NEW DEVELOPMENT

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

65 27.5% 48 33.8% 6 17.6% 6 14.6% 5 27.8% 0 .0% 51 29.0% 8 20.0% 5 33.3% 0 .0% 1 100.0%

93 39.4% 46 32.4% 15 44.1% 22 53.7% 9 50.0% 1 100.0% 68 38.6% 16 40.0% 7 46.7% 2 50.0% 0 .0%

47 19.9% 26 18.3% 9 26.5% 8 19.5% 4 22.2% 0 .0% 32 18.2% 10 25.0% 3 20.0% 2 50.0% 0 .0%

9 3.8% 3 2.1% 4 11.8% 2 4.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 5 2.8% 4 10.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

22 9.3% 19 13.4% 0 .0% 3 7.3% 0 .0% 0 .0% 20 11.4% 2 5.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

Base: Allrespondents

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

4

Under 18

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 9

Page 10: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - DESIGN OF NEW DEVELOPMENT

193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0% 35 100.0%

59 30.6% 5 22.7% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 22 26.2% 17 36.2% 24 24.0% 2 40.0% 32 20.6% 14 40.0%

70 36.3% 11 50.0% 11 55.0% 1 100.0% 23 27.4% 16 34.0% 53 53.0% 1 20.0% 78 50.3% 8 22.9%

38 19.7% 3 13.6% 6 30.0% 0 .0% 18 21.4% 10 21.3% 17 17.0% 2 40.0% 32 20.6% 7 20.0%

7 3.6% 1 4.5% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 4 4.8% 1 2.1% 4 4.0% 0 .0% 6 3.9% 1 2.9%

19 9.8% 2 9.1% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 17 20.2% 3 6.4% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 7 4.5% 5 14.3%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Over 60

(cont.)

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - DESIGN OF NEW DEVELOPMENT

41 100.0% 5 100.0%

17 41.5% 2 40.0%

7 17.1% 0 .0%

7 17.1% 1 20.0%

2 4.9% 0 .0%

8 19.5% 2 40.0%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 10

Page 11: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - TRANSPORT LINKS/ BUS SERVICES

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

90 38.1% 63 44.4% 13 38.2% 9 22.0% 5 27.8% 0 .0% 65 36.9% 17 42.5% 5 33.3% 2 50.0% 1 100.0%

108 45.8% 59 41.5% 15 44.1% 23 56.1% 10 55.6% 1 100.0% 79 44.9% 20 50.0% 7 46.7% 2 50.0% 0 .0%

26 11.0% 12 8.5% 6 17.6% 6 14.6% 2 11.1% 0 .0% 21 11.9% 2 5.0% 3 20.0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

3 1.3% 1 .7% 0 .0% 1 2.4% 1 5.6% 0 .0% 3 1.7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

9 3.8% 7 4.9% 0 .0% 2 4.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 8 4.5% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

Base: Allrespondents

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

4

Under 18

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - TRANSPORT LINKS/ BUS SERVICES

193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0% 35 100.0%

80 41.5% 6 27.3% 4 20.0% 0 .0% 36 42.9% 19 40.4% 32 32.0% 3 60.0% 46 29.7% 21 60.0%

84 43.5% 13 59.1% 10 50.0% 1 100.0% 35 41.7% 24 51.1% 48 48.0% 1 20.0% 78 50.3% 10 28.6%

21 10.9% 1 4.5% 4 20.0% 0 .0% 5 6.0% 4 8.5% 16 16.0% 1 20.0% 24 15.5% 2 5.7%

1 .5% 1 4.5% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 0 .0% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 3 1.9% 0 .0%

7 3.6% 1 4.5% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 7 8.3% 0 .0% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 4 2.6% 2 5.7%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Over 60

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 11

Page 12: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - TRANSPORT LINKS/ BUS SERVICES

41 100.0% 5 100.0%

20 48.8% 3 60.0%

18 43.9% 2 40.0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

3 7.3% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - ROAD SAFETY/ TRAFFIC

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

155 65.7% 92 64.8% 23 67.6% 26 63.4% 13 72.2% 1 100.0% 115 65.3% 28 70.0% 9 60.0% 2 50.0% 1 100.0%

70 29.7% 41 28.9% 10 29.4% 14 34.1% 5 27.8% 0 .0% 54 30.7% 9 22.5% 5 33.3% 2 50.0% 0 .0%

3 1.3% 3 2.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 1.1% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 0 .0% 1 2.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

7 3.0% 6 4.2% 0 .0% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 5 2.8% 1 2.5% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

Base: Allrespondents

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

4

Under 18

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 12

Page 13: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - ROAD SAFETY/ TRAFFIC

193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0% 35 100.0%

130 67.4% 13 59.1% 12 60.0% 0 .0% 56 66.7% 30 63.8% 66 66.0% 3 60.0% 99 63.9% 25 71.4%

54 28.0% 8 36.4% 7 35.0% 1 100.0% 23 27.4% 16 34.0% 29 29.0% 2 40.0% 49 31.6% 7 20.0%

2 1.0% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 3.0% 0 .0% 3 1.9% 0 .0%

1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0%

6 3.1% 0 .0% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 5 6.0% 1 2.1% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 3 1.9% 3 8.6%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Over 60

(cont.)

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - ROAD SAFETY/ TRAFFIC

41 100.0% 5 100.0%

26 63.4% 5 100.0%

14 34.1% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

1 2.4% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 13

Page 14: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - FOOTPATHS/ PAVEMENTS

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

102 43.2% 62 43.7% 14 41.2% 16 39.0% 10 55.6% 0 .0% 77 43.8% 16 40.0% 8 53.3% 0 .0% 1 100.0%

104 44.1% 55 38.7% 18 52.9% 22 53.7% 8 44.4% 1 100.0% 75 42.6% 19 47.5% 6 40.0% 4 100.0% 0 .0%

17 7.2% 14 9.9% 2 5.9% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 13 7.4% 3 7.5% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

3 1.3% 3 2.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 1.1% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

10 4.2% 8 5.6% 0 .0% 2 4.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 9 5.1% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

Base: Allrespondents

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

4

Under 18

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - FOOTPATHS/ PAVEMENTS

193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0% 35 100.0%

86 44.6% 9 40.9% 7 35.0% 0 .0% 40 47.6% 16 34.0% 43 43.0% 3 60.0% 64 41.3% 15 42.9%

80 41.5% 12 54.5% 11 55.0% 1 100.0% 28 33.3% 30 63.8% 45 45.0% 1 20.0% 76 49.0% 15 42.9%

17 8.8% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 6 7.1% 1 2.1% 9 9.0% 1 20.0% 10 6.5% 1 2.9%

2 1.0% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 0 .0% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 2 1.3% 0 .0%

8 4.1% 0 .0% 2 10.0% 0 .0% 9 10.7% 0 .0% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 3 1.9% 4 11.4%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Over 60

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 14

Page 15: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - FOOTPATHS/ PAVEMENTS

41 100.0% 5 100.0%

20 48.8% 3 60.0%

12 29.3% 1 20.0%

6 14.6% 0 .0%

0 .0% 1 20.0%

3 7.3% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - AFFORDABLE HOUSING

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

55 23.3% 38 26.8% 9 26.5% 5 12.2% 3 16.7% 0 .0% 27 15.3% 15 37.5% 10 66.7% 2 50.0% 1 100.0%

87 36.9% 50 35.2% 12 35.3% 15 36.6% 9 50.0% 1 100.0% 64 36.4% 17 42.5% 4 26.7% 2 50.0% 0 .0%

50 21.2% 24 16.9% 9 26.5% 14 34.1% 3 16.7% 0 .0% 45 25.6% 4 10.0% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

27 11.4% 15 10.6% 4 11.8% 5 12.2% 3 16.7% 0 .0% 23 13.1% 4 10.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

17 7.2% 15 10.6% 0 .0% 2 4.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 17 9.7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

Base: Allrespondents

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

4

Under 18

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 15

Page 16: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - AFFORDABLE HOUSING

193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0% 35 100.0%

50 25.9% 3 13.6% 2 10.0% 0 .0% 15 17.9% 9 19.1% 30 30.0% 1 20.0% 37 23.9% 5 14.3%

74 38.3% 8 36.4% 5 25.0% 0 .0% 26 31.0% 21 44.7% 39 39.0% 1 20.0% 59 38.1% 12 34.3%

35 18.1% 8 36.4% 7 35.0% 0 .0% 17 20.2% 10 21.3% 20 20.0% 3 60.0% 37 23.9% 8 22.9%

19 9.8% 2 9.1% 5 25.0% 1 100.0% 13 15.5% 4 8.5% 10 10.0% 0 .0% 18 11.6% 3 8.6%

15 7.8% 1 4.5% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 13 15.5% 3 6.4% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 4 2.6% 7 20.0%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Over 60

(cont.)

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - AFFORDABLE HOUSING

41 100.0% 5 100.0%

12 29.3% 1 20.0%

16 39.0% 0 .0%

4 9.8% 1 20.0%

5 12.2% 1 20.0%

4 9.8% 2 40.0%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 16

Page 17: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - DEVELOPMENT IN THE VILLAGE

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

66 28.0% 43 30.3% 9 26.5% 9 22.0% 5 27.8% 0 .0% 49 27.8% 12 30.0% 5 33.3% 0 .0% 0 .0%

90 38.1% 51 35.9% 16 47.1% 14 34.1% 8 44.4% 1 100.0% 69 39.2% 15 37.5% 3 20.0% 3 75.0% 0 .0%

44 18.6% 23 16.2% 6 17.6% 11 26.8% 4 22.2% 0 .0% 31 17.6% 8 20.0% 4 26.7% 1 25.0% 0 .0%

22 9.3% 14 9.9% 3 8.8% 4 9.8% 1 5.6% 0 .0% 16 9.1% 3 7.5% 2 13.3% 0 .0% 1 100.0%

14 5.9% 11 7.7% 0 .0% 3 7.3% 0 .0% 0 .0% 11 6.3% 2 5.0% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

Base: Allrespondents

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

4

Under 18

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - DEVELOPMENT IN THE VILLAGE

193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0% 35 100.0%

55 28.5% 8 36.4% 3 15.0% 0 .0% 17 20.2% 17 36.2% 31 31.0% 1 20.0% 44 28.4% 13 37.1%

78 40.4% 4 18.2% 8 40.0% 0 .0% 33 39.3% 14 29.8% 42 42.0% 1 20.0% 60 38.7% 7 20.0%

32 16.6% 8 36.4% 3 15.0% 1 100.0% 14 16.7% 11 23.4% 17 17.0% 2 40.0% 32 20.6% 7 20.0%

18 9.3% 0 .0% 4 20.0% 0 .0% 11 13.1% 2 4.3% 8 8.0% 1 20.0% 12 7.7% 3 8.6%

10 5.2% 2 9.1% 2 10.0% 0 .0% 9 10.7% 3 6.4% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 7 4.5% 5 14.3%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Over 60

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 17

Page 18: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - DEVELOPMENT IN THE VILLAGE

41 100.0% 5 100.0%

8 19.5% 1 20.0%

23 56.1% 0 .0%

4 9.8% 1 20.0%

4 9.8% 3 60.0%

2 4.9% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - CLIMATE CHANGE

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

111 47.0% 60 42.3% 18 52.9% 20 48.8% 12 66.7% 1 100.0% 88 50.0% 14 35.0% 8 53.3% 0 .0% 1 100.0%

82 34.7% 51 35.9% 12 35.3% 14 34.1% 5 27.8% 0 .0% 54 30.7% 19 47.5% 5 33.3% 4 100.0% 0 .0%

24 10.2% 16 11.3% 2 5.9% 5 12.2% 1 5.6% 0 .0% 21 11.9% 2 5.0% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

7 3.0% 5 3.5% 2 5.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 4 2.3% 3 7.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

12 5.1% 10 7.0% 0 .0% 2 4.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 9 5.1% 2 5.0% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

Base: Allrespondents

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

4

Under 18

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 18

Page 19: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - CLIMATE CHANGE

193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0% 35 100.0%

90 46.6% 10 45.5% 11 55.0% 0 .0% 34 40.5% 24 51.1% 50 50.0% 3 60.0% 75 48.4% 18 51.4%

67 34.7% 7 31.8% 7 35.0% 1 100.0% 29 34.5% 17 36.2% 35 35.0% 1 20.0% 57 36.8% 9 25.7%

20 10.4% 2 9.1% 2 10.0% 0 .0% 10 11.9% 3 6.4% 10 10.0% 1 20.0% 15 9.7% 4 11.4%

6 3.1% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 3.6% 1 2.1% 3 3.0% 0 .0% 3 1.9% 1 2.9%

10 5.2% 2 9.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 8 9.5% 2 4.3% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 5 3.2% 3 8.6%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Over 60

(cont.)

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - CLIMATE CHANGE

41 100.0% 5 100.0%

17 41.5% 1 20.0%

14 34.1% 2 40.0%

5 12.2% 0 .0%

2 4.9% 1 20.0%

3 7.3% 1 20.0%

Base: All respondents

Very important

Important

Not very important

Not at all important

Not answered

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 19

Page 20: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - Other responses combined

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

222 94.1% 134 94.4% 31 91.2% 39 95.1% 17 94.4% 1 100.0% 165 93.8% 37 92.5% 15 100.0% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

4 1.7% 2 1.4% 2 5.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 3 7.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

3 1.3% 3 2.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 1.7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

2 .8% 1 .7% 1 2.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

2 .8% 1 .7% 0 .0% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 1.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

2 .8% 1 .7% 0 .0% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 1.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 0 .0% 1 2.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 5.6% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 0 .0% 1 2.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

No other

Preservation of architecture

Retention of village post office

Conservation

Policing in the community

Youth discipline

Dogs fouling footpaths

Pavements

Building regulations

All forms of pollution

Environment

Sports facilities

Facilities for young people

Speeding within the village

Access to health services

%Base: All

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

3

%

4Under 18

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

3

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 20

Page 21: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - Other responses combined

193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0% 35 100.0% 41 100.0%

182 94.3% 22 100.0% 17 85.0% 1 100.0% 78 92.9% 43 91.5% 96 96.0% 5 100.0% 148 95.5% 31 88.6% 38 92.7%

4 2.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 2 4.3% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 2 5.7% 1 2.4%

3 1.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 3.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 7.3%

2 1.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 4.3% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 5.7% 0 .0%

1 .5% 0 .0% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 0 .0% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 2 1.3% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .5% 0 .0% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 0 .0% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 2 1.3% 0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.9% 0 .0%

1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.9% 0 .0%

1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.9% 0 .0%

1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.4%

1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

No other

Preservation of architecture

Retention of village post office

Conservation

Policing in the community

Youth discipline

Dogs fouling footpaths

Pavements

Building regulations

All forms of pollution

Environment

Sports facilities

Facilities for young people

Speeding within the village

Access to health services

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2Over 60

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 21

Page 22: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q3. What issues in general are important to you? - Other responses combined

5 100.0%

5 100.0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

Base: All respondents

No other

Preservation of architecture

Retention of village post office

Conservation

Policing in the community

Youth discipline

Dogs fouling footpaths

Pavements

Building regulations

All forms of pollution

Environment

Sports facilities

Facilities for young people

Speeding within the village

Access to health services

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 22

Page 23: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q4. What facilities do you use in the village?

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

60 25.4% 5 3.5% 10 29.4% 33 80.5% 11 61.1% 1 100.0% 56 31.8% 3 7.5% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

220 93.2% 133 93.7% 33 97.1% 37 90.2% 16 88.9% 1 100.0% 162 92.0% 39 97.5% 14 93.3% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

76 32.2% 15 10.6% 16 47.1% 28 68.3% 16 88.9% 1 100.0% 69 39.2% 7 17.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

143 60.6% 62 43.7% 24 70.6% 38 92.7% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 110 62.5% 25 62.5% 7 46.7% 1 25.0% 0 .0%

115 48.7% 80 56.3% 16 47.1% 13 31.7% 5 27.8% 1 100.0% 90 51.1% 16 40.0% 8 53.3% 0 .0% 1 100.0%

Base: All respondents

School

Post office/shop

Village Hall

Play equipment

Playing fields

Church

Num %

Base: Allrespondents

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

4

Under 18

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

Q4. What facilities do you use in the village?

193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0% 35 100.0%

33 17.1% 12 54.5% 15 75.0% 0 .0% 19 22.6% 13 27.7% 26 26.0% 2 40.0% 58 37.4% 1 2.9%

184 95.3% 17 77.3% 18 90.0% 1 100.0% 79 94.0% 42 89.4% 94 94.0% 5 100.0% 142 91.6% 33 94.3%

193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0% 35 100.0%

46 23.8% 14 63.6% 16 80.0% 0 .0% 25 29.8% 19 40.4% 29 29.0% 3 60.0% 65 41.9% 5 14.3%

108 56.0% 19 86.4% 16 80.0% 0 .0% 39 46.4% 29 61.7% 71 71.0% 4 80.0% 114 73.5% 11 31.4%

95 49.2% 11 50.0% 9 45.0% 0 .0% 44 52.4% 23 48.9% 44 44.0% 4 80.0% 65 41.9% 24 68.6%

Base: All respondents

School

Post office/shop

Village Hall

Play equipment

Playing fields

Church

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Over 60

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 23

Page 24: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q4. What facilities do you use in the village?

41 100.0% 5 100.0%

1 2.4% 0 .0%

40 97.6% 5 100.0%

41 100.0% 5 100.0%

5 12.2% 1 20.0%

15 36.6% 3 60.0%

23 56.1% 3 60.0%

Base: All respondents

School

Post office/shop

Village Hall

Play equipment

Playing fields

Church

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

Q5. If you use the Village Hall, what facilities do you use there?

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

104 44.1% 65 45.8% 21 61.8% 14 34.1% 4 22.2% 0 .0% 69 39.2% 22 55.0% 10 66.7% 3 75.0% 0 .0%

20 8.5% 2 1.4% 0 .0% 13 31.7% 4 22.2% 1 100.0% 19 10.8% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

19 8.1% 2 1.4% 3 8.8% 7 17.1% 6 33.3% 1 100.0% 19 10.8% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

29 12.3% 3 2.1% 7 20.6% 9 22.0% 10 55.6% 0 .0% 28 15.9% 0 .0% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

74 31.4% 55 38.7% 10 29.4% 7 17.1% 2 11.1% 0 .0% 46 26.1% 18 45.0% 7 46.7% 2 50.0% 1 100.0%

53 22.5% 20 14.1% 13 38.2% 13 31.7% 7 38.9% 0 .0% 35 19.9% 11 27.5% 4 26.7% 3 75.0% 0 .0%

69 29.2% 12 8.5% 14 41.2% 27 65.9% 15 83.3% 1 100.0% 64 36.4% 5 12.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

129 54.7% 53 37.3% 21 61.8% 37 90.2% 18 100.0% 0 .0% 97 55.1% 23 57.5% 6 40.0% 3 75.0% 0 .0%

27 11.4% 3 2.1% 7 20.6% 10 24.4% 7 38.9% 0 .0% 22 12.5% 4 10.0% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

4 1.7% 2 1.4% 0 .0% 2 4.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 1.1% 1 2.5% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: Those using Village Hall

Social Club

Playgroup

Baby and Toddler group

Scouts

Tasburgh Players

Tennis courts

Play equipment

Playing field

Skate board park

Carpet bowls

Num %

Base: Thoseusing Village

Hall

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

4

Under 18

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 24

Page 25: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q5. If you use the Village Hall, what facilities do you use there?

193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0% 35 100.0%

90 46.6% 11 50.0% 3 15.0% 0 .0% 25 29.8% 29 61.7% 48 48.0% 2 40.0% 70 45.2% 17 48.6%

7 3.6% 4 18.2% 9 45.0% 0 .0% 11 13.1% 3 6.4% 6 6.0% 0 .0% 19 12.3% 0 .0%

8 4.1% 1 4.5% 10 50.0% 0 .0% 11 13.1% 1 2.1% 7 7.0% 0 .0% 18 11.6% 0 .0%

20 10.4% 8 36.4% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 2 2.4% 11 23.4% 16 16.0% 0 .0% 28 18.1% 1 2.9%

67 34.7% 6 27.3% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 23 27.4% 17 36.2% 32 32.0% 2 40.0% 43 27.7% 16 45.7%

44 22.8% 7 31.8% 2 10.0% 0 .0% 10 11.9% 12 25.5% 30 30.0% 1 20.0% 43 27.7% 4 11.4%

40 20.7% 14 63.6% 15 75.0% 0 .0% 23 27.4% 17 36.2% 26 26.0% 3 60.0% 60 38.7% 4 11.4%

97 50.3% 18 81.8% 14 70.0% 0 .0% 32 38.1% 27 57.4% 66 66.0% 4 80.0% 105 67.7% 12 34.3%

20 10.4% 6 27.3% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 2 2.4% 10 21.3% 15 15.0% 0 .0% 25 16.1% 1 2.9%

4 2.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 4 4.0% 0 .0% 4 2.6% 0 .0%

Base: Those using Village Hall

Social Club

Playgroup

Baby and Toddler group

Scouts

Tasburgh Players

Tennis courts

Play equipment

Playing field

Skate board park

Carpet bowls

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Over 60

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 25

Page 26: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q5. If you use the Village Hall, what facilities do you use there?

41 100.0% 5 100.0%

15 36.6% 2 40.0%

1 2.4% 0 .0%

1 2.4% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

14 34.1% 1 20.0%

6 14.6% 0 .0%

4 9.8% 1 20.0%

12 29.3% 0 .0%

1 2.4% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: Those using Village Hall

Social Club

Playgroup

Baby and Toddler group

Scouts

Tasburgh Players

Tennis courts

Play equipment

Playing field

Skate board park

Carpet bowls

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 26

Page 27: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q5. If you use the Village Hall, what facilities do you use there? - Other responses combined

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

183 77.5% 99 69.7% 29 85.3% 38 92.7% 16 88.9% 1 100.0% 136 77.3% 31 77.5% 13 86.7% 2 50.0% 1 100.0%

29 12.3% 25 17.6% 2 5.9% 1 2.4% 1 5.6% 0 .0% 22 12.5% 5 12.5% 1 6.7% 1 25.0% 0 .0%

12 5.1% 10 7.0% 2 5.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 8 4.5% 3 7.5% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

7 3.0% 6 4.2% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 5.6% 0 .0% 7 4.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

3 1.3% 3 2.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 1.7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

2 .8% 1 .7% 1 2.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

2 .8% 1 .7% 0 .0% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 25.0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: Those using Village Hall

No other

Functions/social events

Private hall hire/family events

Recycling facilities

The meeting room

Evening classes

Football/West End football club

Church bookings

Keep fit club

Jumble sales

Cricket

%

Base: Those usingVillage Hall

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

3

%

4

Under 18

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

3

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 27

Page 28: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q5. If you use the Village Hall, what facilities do you use there? - Other responses combined

193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0% 35 100.0% 41 100.0%

145 75.1% 18 81.8% 19 95.0% 1 100.0% 62 73.8% 36 76.6% 80 80.0% 5 100.0% 131 84.5% 24 68.6% 23 56.1%

28 14.5% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 13 15.5% 4 8.5% 12 12.0% 0 .0% 12 7.7% 6 17.1% 11 26.8%

10 5.2% 1 4.5% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 7 8.3% 0 .0% 5 5.0% 0 .0% 7 4.5% 1 2.9% 4 9.8%

4 2.1% 3 13.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 3.6% 2 4.3% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 4 2.6% 0 .0% 3 7.3%

3 1.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 2 4.3% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 8.6% 0 .0%

2 1.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 4.3% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 5.7% 0 .0%

2 1.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 2 1.3% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.4%

1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.4%

1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.4%

1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: Those using Village Hall

No other

Functions/social events

Private hall hire/family events

Recycling facilities

The meeting room

Evening classes

Football/West End football club

Church bookings

Keep fit club

Jumble sales

Cricket

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

Over 60

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 28

Page 29: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q5. If you use the Village Hall, what facilities do you use there? - Other responses combined

5 100.0%

5 100.0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

Base: Those using Village Hall

No other

Functions/social events

Private hall hire/family events

Recycling facilities

The meeting room

Evening classes

Football/West End football club

Church bookings

Keep fit club

Jumble sales

Cricket

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

Q6. What other facilities do you think are needed in Tasburgh?

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

56 23.7% 30 21.1% 9 26.5% 11 26.8% 6 33.3% 0 .0% 42 23.9% 8 20.0% 3 20.0% 3 75.0% 0 .0%

30 12.7% 6 4.2% 4 11.8% 12 29.3% 7 38.9% 1 100.0% 26 14.8% 2 5.0% 1 6.7% 1 25.0% 0 .0%

23 9.7% 13 9.2% 1 2.9% 7 17.1% 2 11.1% 0 .0% 17 9.7% 4 10.0% 1 6.7% 1 25.0% 0 .0%

9 3.8% 6 4.2% 1 2.9% 2 4.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 8 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 25.0% 0 .0%

62 26.3% 38 26.8% 8 23.5% 11 26.8% 5 27.8% 0 .0% 46 26.1% 9 22.5% 5 33.3% 2 50.0% 0 .0%

61 25.8% 29 20.4% 9 26.5% 15 36.6% 8 44.4% 0 .0% 48 27.3% 10 25.0% 2 13.3% 1 25.0% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

More shops

Cafe

Bigger school

Space for businesses

Better access to health facilities

More social facilities/places tomeet

Num %

Base: Allrespondents

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

4

Under 18

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 29

Page 30: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q6. What other facilities do you think are needed in Tasburgh?

193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0% 35 100.0% 41 100.0%

49 25.4% 5 22.7% 2 10.0% 0 .0% 14 16.7% 11 23.4% 31 31.0% 0 .0% 41 26.5% 7 20.0% 8 19.5%

19 9.8% 5 22.7% 6 30.0% 0 .0% 8 9.5% 6 12.8% 16 16.0% 0 .0% 28 18.1% 0 .0% 2 4.9%

17 8.8% 6 27.3% 0 .0% 0 .0% 8 9.5% 9 19.1% 6 6.0% 0 .0% 15 9.7% 2 5.7% 6 14.6%

7 3.6% 2 9.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 3.6% 2 4.3% 4 4.0% 0 .0% 6 3.9% 0 .0% 3 7.3%

51 26.4% 8 36.4% 2 10.0% 1 100.0% 18 21.4% 17 36.2% 26 26.0% 1 20.0% 39 25.2% 12 34.3% 11 26.8%

49 25.4% 7 31.8% 4 20.0% 1 100.0% 20 23.8% 12 25.5% 27 27.0% 2 40.0% 46 29.7% 6 17.1% 9 22.0%

Base: All respondents

More shops

Cafe

Bigger school

Space for businesses

Better access to health facilities

More social facilities/places tomeet

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Over 60

(cont.)

Q6. What other facilities do you think are needed in Tasburgh?

5 100.0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

Base: All respondents

More shops

Cafe

Bigger school

Space for businesses

Better access to health facilities

More social facilities/places tomeet

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 30

Page 31: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q6. What other facilities do you think are needed in Tasburgh? - Other responses combined

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0%

185 78.4% 112 78.9% 29 85.3% 33 80.5% 10 55.6% 1 100.0% 132 75.0% 35 87.5% 13 86.7% 4 100.0%

8 3.4% 7 4.9% 1 2.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 6 3.4% 2 5.0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

6 2.5% 0 .0% 1 2.9% 3 7.3% 2 11.1% 0 .0% 6 3.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

5 2.1% 5 3.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 5 2.8% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

5 2.1% 3 2.1% 0 .0% 1 2.4% 1 5.6% 0 .0% 4 2.3% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0%

3 1.3% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 16.7% 0 .0% 3 1.7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

3 1.3% 3 2.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 1.7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

3 1.3% 1 .7% 0 .0% 2 4.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 1.7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

3 1.3% 2 1.4% 1 2.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 2 5.0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

3 1.3% 2 1.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 5.6% 0 .0% 3 1.7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

3 1.3% 0 .0% 2 5.9% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 2 5.0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

2 .8% 2 1.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 1.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

2 .8% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 11.1% 0 .0% 2 1.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

2 .8% 2 1.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 1.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

2 .8% 2 1.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 1.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 5.6% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 0 .0% 1 2.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 6.7% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 6.7% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

No other

Improvements to current villageshop/post office

Youth club facilities for the youngerchildren

Need to preserve village character

Improvements/ new village hall

A new village pub

Improved information for allvillagers

Newsagents

Social activities designed for youths

Purchase of land adjoining schoolfor extra field area

Improved sports facilities

Footpaths away from traffic

Park or public space in lowerTasburgh

A local dentist

Improved bus services

Delivery service of farm produce

Weekly fish/chip van

A neighbourhood watch scheme

A good restaurant

Wireless broadband

A Doctors surgery

Car share scheme for nondrivers/long Stratton/Norwich

Better play area for youngerchildren

%Base: All respondents

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

3

%

4Under 18

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

3Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 31

Page 32: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q6. What other facilities do you think are needed in Tasburgh? - Other responses combined

1 .4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

A park area

Adult education centre/ classes

Nursery

Improve school

%Base: All respondents

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

3

%

4Under 18

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

3Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 32

Page 33: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q6. What other facilities do you think are needed in Tasburgh? - Other responses combined

1 100.0% 193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0% 35 100.0%

1 100.0% 153 79.3% 15 68.2% 17 85.0% 0 .0% 68 81.0% 33 70.2% 80 80.0% 4 80.0% 123 79.4% 27 77.1%

0 .0% 5 2.6% 3 13.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 2.4% 3 6.4% 2 2.0% 1 20.0% 7 4.5% 0 .0%

0 .0% 3 1.6% 2 9.1% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 3 6.4% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 6 3.9% 0 .0%

0 .0% 5 2.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 4 4.8% 0 .0% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 1 2.9%

0 .0% 5 2.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.1% 4 4.0% 0 .0% 4 2.6% 1 2.9%

0 .0% 3 1.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 3.0% 0 .0% 3 1.9% 0 .0%

0 .0% 2 1.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 100.0% 3 3.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0%

0 .0% 2 1.0% 0 .0% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 1 2.1% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 2 1.3% 0 .0%

0 .0% 3 1.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 6.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 2 5.7%

0 .0% 3 1.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 2.4% 0 .0% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0%

0 .0% 2 1.0% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 4.3% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 2 1.3% 1 2.9%

0 .0% 2 1.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.1% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.9%

0 .0% 1 .5% 0 .0% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 0 .0% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 2 1.3% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0% 2 9.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 4.3% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 1.3% 0 .0%

0 .0% 2 1.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 4.3% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 5.7%

0 .0% 1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.9%

0 .0% 1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.9%

0 .0% 1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0%

0 .0% 1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0%

0 .0% 1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0%

0 .0% 1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.9%

0 .0% 1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

No other

Improvements to current villageshop/post office

Youth club facilities for the youngerchildren

Need to preserve village character

Improvements/ new village hall

A new village pub

Improved information for allvillagers

Newsagents

Social activities designed for youths

Purchase of land adjoining schoolfor extra field area

Improved sports facilities

Footpaths away from traffic

Park or public space in lowerTasburgh

A local dentist

Improved bus services

Delivery service of farm produce

Weekly fish/chip van

A neighbourhood watch scheme

A good restaurant

Wireless broadband

A Doctors surgery

Car share scheme for nondrivers/long Stratton/Norwich

Better play area for youngerchildren

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

%

None/notanswered

%

1Over 60

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 33

Page 34: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q6. What other facilities do you think are needed in Tasburgh? - Other responses combined

0 .0% 1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0%

0 .0% 1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0%

0 .0% 1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

A park area

Adult education centre/ classes

Nursery

Improve school

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

%

None/notanswered

%

1Over 60

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 34

Page 35: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q6. What other facilities do you think are needed in Tasburgh? - Other responses combined

41 100.0% 5 100.0%

31 75.6% 4 80.0%

1 2.4% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

3 7.3% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

1 2.4% 1 20.0%

1 2.4% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

2 4.9% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

1 2.4% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

No other

Improvements to current villageshop/post office

Youth club facilities for the youngerchildren

Need to preserve village character

Improvements/ new village hall

A new village pub

Improved information for allvillagers

Newsagents

Social activities designed for youths

Purchase of land adjoining schoolfor extra field area

Improved sports facilities

Footpaths away from traffic

Park or public space in lowerTasburgh

A local dentist

Improved bus services

Delivery service of farm produce

Weekly fish/chip van

A neighbourhood watch scheme

A good restaurant

Wireless broadband

A Doctors surgery

Car share scheme for nondrivers/long Stratton/Norwich

Better play area for youngerchildren

%

2

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 35

Page 36: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q6. What other facilities do you think are needed in Tasburgh? - Other responses combined

0 .0% 0 .0%

1 2.4% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0%

1 2.4% 0 .0%

A park area

Adult education centre/ classes

Nursery

Improve school

%

2

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

Q7b. Do you think we need better footpaths around the village?

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

153 64.8% 92 64.8% 18 52.9% 29 70.7% 13 72.2% 1 100.0% 119 67.6% 22 55.0% 9 60.0% 2 50.0% 1 100.0%

71 30.1% 38 26.8% 16 47.1% 12 29.3% 5 27.8% 0 .0% 48 27.3% 16 40.0% 5 33.3% 2 50.0% 0 .0%

12 5.1% 12 8.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 9 5.1% 2 5.0% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

Yes

No

Not answered

Num %

Base: Allrespondents

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

4

Under 18

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

Q7b. Do you think we need better footpaths around the village?

193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0% 35 100.0%

120 62.2% 15 68.2% 17 85.0% 1 100.0% 62 73.8% 29 61.7% 58 58.0% 4 80.0% 97 62.6% 23 65.7%

61 31.6% 7 31.8% 3 15.0% 0 .0% 14 16.7% 17 36.2% 39 39.0% 1 20.0% 55 35.5% 9 25.7%

12 6.2% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 8 9.5% 1 2.1% 3 3.0% 0 .0% 3 1.9% 3 8.6%

Base: All respondents

Yes

No

Not answered

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Over 60

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 36

Page 37: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q7b. Do you think we need better footpaths around the village?

41 100.0% 5 100.0%

30 73.2% 3 60.0%

6 14.6% 1 20.0%

5 12.2% 1 20.0%

Base: All respondents

Yes

No

Not answered

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

Q7d.1. Do you think we need better cycle paths in the area?

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

105 44.5% 58 40.8% 19 55.9% 17 41.5% 11 61.1% 0 .0% 83 47.2% 19 47.5% 3 20.0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

104 44.1% 66 46.5% 12 35.3% 22 53.7% 3 16.7% 1 100.0% 69 39.2% 20 50.0% 10 66.7% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

27 11.4% 18 12.7% 3 8.8% 2 4.9% 4 22.2% 0 .0% 24 13.6% 1 2.5% 2 13.3% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

Yes

No

Not answered

Num %

Base: Allrespondents

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

4

Under 18

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

Q7d.1. Do you think we need better cycle paths in the area?

193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0% 35 100.0%

89 46.1% 10 45.5% 5 25.0% 1 100.0% 28 33.3% 24 51.1% 49 49.0% 4 80.0% 73 47.1% 14 40.0%

81 42.0% 11 50.0% 12 60.0% 0 .0% 42 50.0% 20 42.6% 41 41.0% 1 20.0% 67 43.2% 18 51.4%

23 11.9% 1 4.5% 3 15.0% 0 .0% 14 16.7% 3 6.4% 10 10.0% 0 .0% 15 9.7% 3 8.6%

Base: All respondents

Yes

No

Not answered

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Over 60

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 37

Page 38: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q7d.1. Do you think we need better cycle paths in the area?

41 100.0% 5 100.0%

18 43.9% 0 .0%

15 36.6% 4 80.0%

8 19.5% 1 20.0%

Base: All respondents

Yes

No

Not answered

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

Q7e.1. Do you think we need better bus services?

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

95 40.3% 68 47.9% 16 47.1% 7 17.1% 4 22.2% 0 .0% 59 33.5% 26 65.0% 6 40.0% 3 75.0% 1 100.0%

110 46.6% 54 38.0% 16 47.1% 31 75.6% 8 44.4% 1 100.0% 89 50.6% 12 30.0% 8 53.3% 1 25.0% 0 .0%

31 13.1% 20 14.1% 2 5.9% 3 7.3% 6 33.3% 0 .0% 28 15.9% 2 5.0% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: All respondents

Yes

No

Not answered

Num %

Base: Allrespondents

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

4

Under 18

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

3

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

Q7e.1. Do you think we need better bus services?

193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0% 35 100.0%

87 45.1% 6 27.3% 2 10.0% 0 .0% 29 34.5% 19 40.4% 43 43.0% 4 80.0% 59 38.1% 17 48.6%

80 41.5% 13 59.1% 16 80.0% 1 100.0% 39 46.4% 21 44.7% 49 49.0% 1 20.0% 81 52.3% 11 31.4%

26 13.5% 3 13.6% 2 10.0% 0 .0% 16 19.0% 7 14.9% 8 8.0% 0 .0% 15 9.7% 7 20.0%

Base: All respondents

Yes

No

Not answered

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

Num %

None/notanswered

Num %

1

Over 60

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 38

Page 39: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q7e.1. Do you think we need better bus services?

41 100.0% 5 100.0%

17 41.5% 2 40.0%

16 39.0% 2 40.0%

8 19.5% 1 20.0%

Base: All respondents

Yes

No

Not answered

Num %

2

Num %

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 39

Page 40: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q13. What do you like most about Tasburgh? - Combined responses

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

123 52.1% 73 51.4% 17 50.0% 24 58.5% 8 44.4% 1 100.0% 92 52.3% 20 50.0% 9 60.0% 1 25.0% 1 100.0%

69 29.2% 43 30.3% 12 35.3% 8 19.5% 5 27.8% 1 100.0% 48 27.3% 16 40.0% 3 20.0% 2 50.0% 0 .0%

43 18.2% 24 16.9% 6 17.6% 8 19.5% 5 27.8% 0 .0% 33 18.8% 8 20.0% 2 13.3% 0 .0% 0 .0%

43 18.2% 24 16.9% 6 17.6% 11 26.8% 2 11.1% 0 .0% 34 19.3% 4 10.0% 4 26.7% 1 25.0% 0 .0%

27 11.4% 8 5.6% 3 8.8% 14 34.1% 2 11.1% 0 .0% 22 12.5% 4 10.0% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

20 8.5% 15 10.6% 1 2.9% 4 9.8% 0 .0% 0 .0% 11 6.3% 6 15.0% 3 20.0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

17 7.2% 11 7.7% 3 8.8% 1 2.4% 2 11.1% 0 .0% 10 5.7% 4 10.0% 2 13.3% 1 25.0% 0 .0%

16 6.8% 5 3.5% 3 8.8% 6 14.6% 2 11.1% 0 .0% 11 6.3% 4 10.0% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

16 6.8% 8 5.6% 3 8.8% 3 7.3% 1 5.6% 1 100.0% 14 8.0% 0 .0% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 1 100.0%

15 6.4% 9 6.3% 1 2.9% 2 4.9% 3 16.7% 0 .0% 11 6.3% 4 10.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

13 5.5% 9 6.3% 3 8.8% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 5 2.8% 5 12.5% 2 13.3% 0 .0% 1 100.0%

11 4.7% 6 4.2% 3 8.8% 1 2.4% 1 5.6% 0 .0% 7 4.0% 4 10.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

7 3.0% 3 2.1% 0 .0% 2 4.9% 2 11.1% 0 .0% 7 4.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

6 2.5% 1 .7% 2 5.9% 3 7.3% 0 .0% 0 .0% 6 3.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

5 2.1% 2 1.4% 1 2.9% 1 2.4% 1 5.6% 0 .0% 4 2.3% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

3 1.3% 2 1.4% 1 2.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 1.1% 0 .0% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

3 1.3% 3 2.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 1.1% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

2 .8% 0 .0% 1 2.9% 0 .0% 1 5.6% 0 .0% 1 .6% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: Those who would like betterbus services

Friendly community/ people

Peaceful

Access to countryside/rural setting

Ease of travel/access to city

Good school

Pretty unspoilt village

No answer

Open spaces

It's size/village

The location

Very little crime/safe

The post office

Good village societies etc

The Village hall

Historical/architectural heritage

Near southern by-pass

No street lights

Parks and amenities

Good bus service

%

Base: Those whowould like better

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

3

%

4

Under 18

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

3

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 40

Page 41: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q13. What do you like most about Tasburgh? - Combined responses

193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0% 35 100.0% 41 100.0%

97 50.3% 13 59.1% 13 65.0% 0 .0% 44 52.4% 24 51.1% 53 53.0% 2 40.0% 82 52.9% 15 42.9% 26 63.4%

56 29.0% 9 40.9% 4 20.0% 0 .0% 22 26.2% 18 38.3% 28 28.0% 1 20.0% 44 28.4% 13 37.1% 9 22.0%

34 17.6% 4 18.2% 5 25.0% 0 .0% 13 15.5% 10 21.3% 19 19.0% 1 20.0% 30 19.4% 6 17.1% 7 17.1%

26 13.5% 9 40.9% 7 35.0% 1 100.0% 17 20.2% 8 17.0% 17 17.0% 1 20.0% 33 21.3% 3 8.6% 6 14.6%

17 8.8% 4 18.2% 6 30.0% 0 .0% 12 14.3% 3 6.4% 11 11.0% 1 20.0% 23 14.8% 2 5.7% 2 4.9%

16 8.3% 1 4.5% 3 15.0% 0 .0% 8 9.5% 2 4.3% 9 9.0% 1 20.0% 15 9.7% 3 8.6% 2 4.9%

17 8.8% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 6 7.1% 5 10.6% 6 6.0% 0 .0% 9 5.8% 4 11.4% 3 7.3%

11 5.7% 3 13.6% 2 10.0% 0 .0% 3 3.6% 3 6.4% 10 10.0% 0 .0% 15 9.7% 1 2.9% 0 .0%

11 5.7% 4 18.2% 0 .0% 1 100.0% 4 4.8% 6 12.8% 5 5.0% 1 20.0% 12 7.7% 2 5.7% 1 2.4%

14 7.3% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 4 4.8% 0 .0% 11 11.0% 0 .0% 11 7.1% 0 .0% 4 9.8%

11 5.7% 2 9.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 2.4% 2 4.3% 8 8.0% 1 20.0% 11 7.1% 0 .0% 2 4.9%

10 5.2% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 2 4.3% 7 7.0% 1 20.0% 10 6.5% 0 .0% 1 2.4%

6 3.1% 0 .0% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 3 3.6% 1 2.1% 3 3.0% 0 .0% 4 2.6% 3 8.6% 0 .0%

5 2.6% 0 .0% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 2 2.4% 2 4.3% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 5 3.2% 1 2.9% 0 .0%

3 1.6% 2 9.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 6.4% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 4 2.6% 1 2.9% 0 .0%

2 1.0% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 0 .0% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 2 1.3% 0 .0% 1 2.4%

3 1.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 2 4.3% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 2 5.7% 0 .0%

2 1.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 2 1.3% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.4%

Base: Those who would like betterbus services

Friendly community/ people

Peaceful

Access to countryside/rural setting

Ease of travel/access to city

Good school

Pretty unspoilt village

No answer

Open spaces

It's size/village

The location

Very little crime/safe

The post office

Good village societies etc

The Village hall

Historical/architectural heritage

Near southern by-pass

No street lights

Parks and amenities

Good bus service

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

Over 60

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 41

Page 42: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q13. What do you like most about Tasburgh? - Combined responses

5 100.0%

0 .0%

3 60.0%

0 .0%

1 20.0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

1 20.0%

0 .0%

1 20.0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

Base: Those who would like betterbus services

Friendly community/ people

Peaceful

Access to countryside/rural setting

Ease of travel/access to city

Good school

Pretty unspoilt village

No answer

Open spaces

It's size/village

The location

Very little crime/safe

The post office

Good village societies etc

The Village hall

Historical/architectural heritage

Near southern by-pass

No street lights

Parks and amenities

Good bus service

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 42

Page 43: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q14. What do you like least about Tasburgh? - Combined responses

236 100.0% 142 100.0% 34 100.0% 41 100.0% 18 100.0% 1 100.0% 176 100.0% 40 100.0% 15 100.0% 4 100.0% 1 100.0%

72 30.5% 43 30.3% 12 35.3% 10 24.4% 6 33.3% 1 100.0% 54 30.7% 11 27.5% 5 33.3% 2 50.0% 0 .0%

33 14.0% 26 18.3% 2 5.9% 3 7.3% 2 11.1% 0 .0% 24 13.6% 4 10.0% 5 33.3% 0 .0% 0 .0%

19 8.1% 11 7.7% 3 8.8% 3 7.3% 2 11.1% 0 .0% 14 8.0% 4 10.0% 0 .0% 1 25.0% 0 .0%

16 6.8% 8 5.6% 2 5.9% 2 4.9% 4 22.2% 0 .0% 12 6.8% 4 10.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

15 6.4% 6 4.2% 1 2.9% 5 12.2% 3 16.7% 0 .0% 13 7.4% 2 5.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

13 5.5% 12 8.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 5.6% 0 .0% 12 6.8% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

12 5.1% 5 3.5% 1 2.9% 5 12.2% 1 5.6% 0 .0% 7 4.0% 3 7.5% 1 6.7% 1 25.0% 0 .0%

12 5.1% 6 4.2% 0 .0% 5 12.2% 1 5.6% 0 .0% 9 5.1% 2 5.0% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

11 4.7% 8 5.6% 1 2.9% 2 4.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 10 5.7% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

10 4.2% 5 3.5% 3 8.8% 1 2.4% 1 5.6% 0 .0% 9 5.1% 0 .0% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

9 3.8% 5 3.5% 4 11.8% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 6 3.4% 2 5.0% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

8 3.4% 7 4.9% 1 2.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 6 3.4% 2 5.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

8 3.4% 4 2.8% 2 5.9% 2 4.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 5 2.8% 2 5.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 100.0%

7 3.0% 4 2.8% 2 5.9% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 5 2.8% 2 5.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

7 3.0% 5 3.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 11.1% 0 .0% 4 2.3% 0 .0% 3 20.0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

6 2.5% 4 2.8% 0 .0% 2 4.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 5 2.8% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 25.0% 0 .0%

5 2.1% 4 2.8% 1 2.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 1.1% 3 7.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

5 2.1% 3 2.1% 2 5.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 3 7.5% 0 .0% 1 25.0% 0 .0%

4 1.7% 1 .7% 1 2.9% 1 2.4% 1 5.6% 0 .0% 2 1.1% 0 .0% 2 13.3% 0 .0% 0 .0%

4 1.7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 4 9.8% 0 .0% 0 .0% 4 2.3% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

4 1.7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 4 22.2% 0 .0% 4 2.3% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

3 1.3% 2 1.4% 0 .0% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 1.7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

3 1.3% 3 2.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 1.7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Base: Those who would like betterbus services

No answer

Turning right onto A140/Junctionwith

The A140/speed of traffic on

Speeding on 30mph roads

Dog fouling on footpaths

Large increase in traffic

Lack of street lighting

Traffic on Church road

Litter strewnpaths/verges/hedgerows

Lack of footpaths

Traffic cutting through from A140

Noisy youths on streets

Its gradual expansion/threat ofnew development

The few people who are anti-socialand selfish

Too many cars with no parkingspaces

Inconsiderate parking

Lack of shops & basic amenities

Lack of good village store/wellstocked

Poor standard of village hall

No mains gas

Pollution

Unsociable/clique people

Frequent power cuts

%

Base: Those whowould like better

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

3

%

4

Under 18

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

3

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 43

Page 44: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q14. What do you like least about Tasburgh? - Combined responses

3 1.3% 3 2.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 1.1% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

3 1.3% 1 .7% 1 2.9% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 1.7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

2 .8% 2 1.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

2 .8% 1 .7% 0 .0% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 25.0% 0 .0%

2 .8% 1 .7% 0 .0% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 1.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

2 .8% 0 .0% 1 2.9% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

2 .8% 0 .0% 2 5.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 1.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

2 .8% 1 .7% 0 .0% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 1.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 0 .0% 1 2.9% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 6.7% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 1 .7% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Some unsightly gardens

Lack of facilities for youths

Woodland Rise

No late bus service

Poor bus service

Social club needs to involve thewhole community

Poor recycling facilities

Burnt-out cars dumped onSaxlingham Lane

Need new pub in the village

Too few dances in village hall

Poor flood defences

No heart to village

Dormatory village/lacks character

House security lights dazzlingmotorists

Need lower cost housing for firsttime buyers

Green/black wheelie bins on show

Lack of health facilities foryoung/elderly housebound

Lack of innovation/ newdevelopment

%

Base: Those whowould like better

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

3

%

4

Under 18

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

3

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 18 and 25

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 44

Page 45: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q14. What do you like least about Tasburgh? - Combined responses

193 100.0% 22 100.0% 20 100.0% 1 100.0% 84 100.0% 47 100.0% 100 100.0% 5 100.0% 155 100.0% 35 100.0% 41 100.0%

60 31.1% 6 27.3% 5 25.0% 1 100.0% 28 33.3% 14 29.8% 30 30.0% 0 .0% 47 30.3% 11 31.4% 11 26.8%

32 16.6% 0 .0% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 12 14.3% 0 .0% 19 19.0% 2 40.0% 22 14.2% 1 2.9% 10 24.4%

16 8.3% 3 13.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 4 4.8% 6 12.8% 7 7.0% 2 40.0% 11 7.1% 4 11.4% 4 9.8%

12 6.2% 2 9.1% 2 10.0% 0 .0% 7 8.3% 4 8.5% 5 5.0% 0 .0% 9 5.8% 5 14.3% 2 4.9%

12 6.2% 1 4.5% 2 10.0% 0 .0% 2 2.4% 4 8.5% 9 9.0% 0 .0% 13 8.4% 2 5.7% 0 .0%

12 6.2% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 6 7.1% 1 2.1% 6 6.0% 0 .0% 4 2.6% 3 8.6% 5 12.2%

9 4.7% 2 9.1% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 6 7.1% 2 4.3% 4 4.0% 0 .0% 7 4.5% 2 5.7% 3 7.3%

7 3.6% 1 4.5% 4 20.0% 0 .0% 7 8.3% 2 4.3% 3 3.0% 0 .0% 8 5.2% 2 5.7% 1 2.4%

7 3.6% 2 9.1% 2 10.0% 0 .0% 3 3.6% 5 10.6% 3 3.0% 0 .0% 6 3.9% 2 5.7% 3 7.3%

8 4.1% 0 .0% 2 10.0% 0 .0% 4 4.8% 2 4.3% 4 4.0% 0 .0% 6 3.9% 1 2.9% 3 7.3%

8 4.1% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 2.4% 1 2.1% 6 6.0% 0 .0% 7 4.5% 2 5.7% 0 .0%

8 4.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 3.6% 2 4.3% 3 3.0% 0 .0% 3 1.9% 3 8.6% 2 4.9%

6 3.1% 1 4.5% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 2 2.4% 1 2.1% 4 4.0% 1 20.0% 7 4.5% 0 .0% 1 2.4%

6 3.1% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 2.4% 2 4.3% 3 3.0% 0 .0% 4 2.6% 1 2.9% 2 4.9%

7 3.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 1 2.1% 5 5.0% 0 .0% 5 3.2% 1 2.9% 1 2.4%

5 2.6% 0 .0% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 4 4.8% 0 .0% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 4 2.6% 1 2.9% 1 2.4%

4 2.1% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 2 4.3% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 5 3.2% 0 .0% 0 .0%

4 2.1% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 4 8.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 1.9% 2 5.7% 0 .0%

3 1.6% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.1% 3 3.0% 0 .0% 4 2.6% 0 .0% 0 .0%

2 1.0% 2 9.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 4.3% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 4 2.6% 0 .0% 0 .0%

4 2.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 4 4.0% 0 .0% 4 2.6% 0 .0% 0 .0%

2 1.0% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 2 4.3% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 1 2.9% 1 2.4%

3 1.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 20.0% 1 .6% 1 2.9% 1 2.4%

Base: Those who would like betterbus services

No answer

Turning right onto A140/Junctionwith

The A140/speed of traffic on

Speeding on 30mph roads

Dog fouling on footpaths

Large increase in traffic

Lack of street lighting

Traffic on Church road

Litter strewnpaths/verges/hedgerows

Lack of footpaths

Traffic cutting through from A140

Noisy youths on streets

Its gradual expansion/threat ofnew development

The few people who are anti-socialand selfish

Too many cars with no parkingspaces

Inconsiderate parking

Lack of shops & basic amenities

Lack of good village store/wellstocked

Poor standard of village hall

No mains gas

Pollution

Unsociable/clique people

Frequent power cuts

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

Over 60

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 45

Page 46: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q14. What do you like least about Tasburgh? - Combined responses

3 1.6% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 0 .0% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 2 1.3% 0 .0% 1 2.4%

2 1.0% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.1% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 3 1.9% 0 .0% 0 .0%

2 1.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.1% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 1 2.9% 0 .0%

1 .5% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 1 2.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 1.3% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .5% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 4.3% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 1 2.9% 0 .0%

2 1.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 2.0% 0 .0% 2 1.3% 0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0% 2 10.0% 0 .0% 2 2.4% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 1.3% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .5% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 0 .0% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 2 1.3% 0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 0 .0% 1 5.0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 20.0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.2% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.4%

1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1.0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0%

1 .5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0%

0 .0% 1 4.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 2.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 .6% 0 .0% 0 .0%

Some unsightly gardens

Lack of facilities for youths

Woodland Rise

No late bus service

Poor bus service

Social club needs to involve thewhole community

Poor recycling facilities

Burnt-out cars dumped onSaxlingham Lane

Need new pub in the village

Too few dances in village hall

Poor flood defences

No heart to village

Dormatory village/lacks character

House security lights dazzlingmotorists

Need lower cost housing for firsttime buyers

Green/black wheelie bins on show

Lack of health facilities foryoung/elderly housebound

Lack of innovation/ newdevelopment

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 26 and 35

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Between 36 and 59

%

None/notanswered

%

1

%

2

Over 60

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 46

Page 47: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q14. What do you like least about Tasburgh? - Combined responses

5 100.0%

3 60.0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

1 20.0%

0 .0%

1 20.0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

Base: Those who would like betterbus services

No answer

Turning right onto A140/Junctionwith

The A140/speed of traffic on

Speeding on 30mph roads

Dog fouling on footpaths

Large increase in traffic

Lack of street lighting

Traffic on Church road

Litter strewnpaths/verges/hedgerows

Lack of footpaths

Traffic cutting through from A140

Noisy youths on streets

Its gradual expansion/threat ofnew development

The few people who are anti-socialand selfish

Too many cars with no parkingspaces

Inconsiderate parking

Lack of shops & basic amenities

Lack of good village store/wellstocked

Poor standard of village hall

No mains gas

Pollution

Unsociable/clique people

Frequent power cuts

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

(cont.)

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 47

Page 48: Parish Plan Tabulated Results

Q14. What do you like least about Tasburgh? - Combined responses

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

0 .0%

Some unsightly gardens

Lack of facilities for youths

Woodland Rise

No late bus service

Poor bus service

Social club needs to involve thewhole community

Poor recycling facilities

Burnt-out cars dumped onSaxlingham Lane

Need new pub in the village

Too few dances in village hall

Poor flood defences

No heart to village

Dormatory village/lacks character

House security lights dazzlingmotorists

Need lower cost housing for firsttime buyers

Green/black wheelie bins on show

Lack of health facilities foryoung/elderly housebound

Lack of innovation/ newdevelopment

%

Ticked but nonumber given

Over 60

J8145 Tasburgh Parish Plan Postal Survey ResultsCross tabulations

Research & Marketing PlusApril 2007

Page 48