p#3 tahapan penelitian
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: P#3 tahapan penelitian](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052301/559e21901a28ab1e3c8b476b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Tahapan Penelitian
Prof. Zainal A. Hasibuan, Ph. D.
Aptikom Doctoral Boot CampPulau Duntungan, Kab. Barru, Sulsel
12-14 April 2013
![Page 2: P#3 tahapan penelitian](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052301/559e21901a28ab1e3c8b476b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
General Model of Scientific of Inquiry
State General Problem
Conduct Literature
Search
State Specific Problem
Design Methodology
Gather Data
Analyze Data
Report Results
Refine Hypotheses
![Page 3: P#3 tahapan penelitian](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052301/559e21901a28ab1e3c8b476b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Tahapan Penelitian
![Page 4: P#3 tahapan penelitian](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052301/559e21901a28ab1e3c8b476b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
- Pertanyaan Penelitian
Kaedah2 Ilmiah
Identifikasi Masalah & Perumusan Masalah
![Page 5: P#3 tahapan penelitian](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052301/559e21901a28ab1e3c8b476b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Penelusuran Pustaka (Literature Review)
![Page 6: P#3 tahapan penelitian](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052301/559e21901a28ab1e3c8b476b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Example : Comparing
“Menurut penelitian yang dilakukan oleh Andri (1999), kinerja IRS denganmenggunakan teknik Extended Boolean lebih baik dibanding menggunakan teknik Boolean saja. Hal ini sejalan dengan hasil-hasil penelitian sebelumnya yang dilakukan oleh Savoy (1995), Salton (1990), dll.”
Andri, 1999
Savoy, 1995Salton, 1990
Si penulis meng-”comparepaper Andri, Savoy danSalton (mencari yg sama)
![Page 7: P#3 tahapan penelitian](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052301/559e21901a28ab1e3c8b476b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Example : Contrasting• “Hasil penelitian yang dilakukan oleh Santoso (2006) menunjukkan bahwa
gaya belajar konstruktif lebih adaptif terhadap penggunaan ICT. Hal ini bertentangan dengan hasil penelitian lainnya yang mengatakan bahwa gaya positivist yang lebih adaptif terhadap penggunaan ICT (Ford, 1998; Huge, 2001”).
Santoso, 2006
Ford, 1998 Huge, 2001
Si penulis meng-”cotrast”paper Santoso, dengan FordDan Huge (mencari perbedaannya)
![Page 8: P#3 tahapan penelitian](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052301/559e21901a28ab1e3c8b476b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Example : Criticizing
• Menurut Hadi (2005) Sistem Informasi Untuk Eksekutif (EIS) dapat membantu pimpinan mengambil keputusan lebih akurat sekitar 90% dibanding tidak menggunakan EIS, tetapi tidak dijelaskan berapa banyak sample EIS yang disurvei dan kategori keputusan yang bagaimana yang dijadikan sebagai acuan.
Si penulis mengkritikpaper Hadi, (mencari kelemahan)
Hadi, 2005
![Page 9: P#3 tahapan penelitian](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052301/559e21901a28ab1e3c8b476b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Example : Synthesize
• “Menurut Hadi (2005) keberhasilan suatu Sistem Informasi Untuk Eksekutif (EIS) sangat ditentukan oleh tingkat ke akuratan menangkap kebutuhan para eksekutif sedangkan menurut Amir (2006), EIS sangat ditentukan oleh kejelasan core bisnis dari perusahaannya. Dari kedua pendapat tersebut, dapat dikatakan bahwa faktor-2 penentu keberhasilan EIS antara lain: keakuratan menangkap kebutuhan pimpinan, dan kejelasan core bisnis perusahaan”
Synthesize:
combine several literatures into an
idea
Hadi, 2005 Amir, 2006
![Page 10: P#3 tahapan penelitian](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052301/559e21901a28ab1e3c8b476b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Why doing a literature review?
• To identify gaps in the literature.
• To avoid reinventing the wheel (at the very least this will save time and it can stop you from making the same mistakes as others).
• To identify methods that could be relevant to your project.
• To carry on from where others have already reached (reviewing the field allows you to build on the platform of existing knowledge and ideas).
• To identify other people working in the same fields (a researcher network is a valuable resource).
• To increase your breadth of knowledge of your subject area.
![Page 11: P#3 tahapan penelitian](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052301/559e21901a28ab1e3c8b476b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Types of Research Method/Design that Research Methodology Can Be Build Upon
Case Study
![Page 12: P#3 tahapan penelitian](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052301/559e21901a28ab1e3c8b476b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Collecting DataSecondary
Data Compilation
Observation
Experimentation
Print or Electronic
Survey
PrimaryData Collection
Basic Business Statistics 10e, 2006 Prentice Hall
Content Analysis
![Page 13: P#3 tahapan penelitian](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052301/559e21901a28ab1e3c8b476b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Pengolahan Data: Distribusi dengan UkuranPemusatan
Mean = Median = Mode
![Page 14: P#3 tahapan penelitian](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052301/559e21901a28ab1e3c8b476b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Fre
qu
en
cy
420-2-4-6
40
30
20
10
0
420-2-4-6
20
15
10
5
0
data1 data2
Histogram of data1 , data2
Fre
qu
en
cy
43210-1-2
25
20
15
10
5
0
43210-1-2
20
15
10
5
0
data1 data3
Histogram of data1 , data3
Ukuran Pemusatan relatif sama namun ukuran penyebaran relatif berbeda
Ukuran Pemusatan relatif berbeda namun ukuran penyebaran relatif sama
?C14
Fre
qu
en
cy
543210-1-2
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Histogram of C1 4
bimodus
outlier
![Page 15: P#3 tahapan penelitian](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052301/559e21901a28ab1e3c8b476b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Penarikan Kesimpulan
Scientific Writing
Kesimpulan 1
Kesimpulan 2
Kesimpulan ..n
![Page 16: P#3 tahapan penelitian](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052301/559e21901a28ab1e3c8b476b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Presentasi Hasil Penelitian
![Page 17: P#3 tahapan penelitian](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052301/559e21901a28ab1e3c8b476b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Output dari Penelitian
![Page 18: P#3 tahapan penelitian](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052301/559e21901a28ab1e3c8b476b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Contoh Hasil Review PaperEvaluation:
Poor Fair Good Very Good Outstanding
Originality ○ ○ ○ ● ○
Innovation ○ ○ ● ○ ○
technical merit ○ ○ ○ ● ○
applicability ○ ○ ● ○ ○
Presentation and
English
○ ○○
● ○
Match to Conference
Topic
○ ○ ●○
○
Recommendation to Editors
Strongly Reject Reject Marginally Accept Accept Strong Accept
Recommendation ○ ○ ○ ● ○
Comments:
Instructions for Composition of Final Paper:
The author should prepare the final version of the paper as per review instructions. The abstract of the
paper should satisfactorily show the aims, methods and result of the paper. The materials and methods
described in the paper should adequately support the arguments. The language used should adequately
inform the reader. The references shown should be relevant and cited in the paper