osep – results -driven accountability

25
All components of an accountability system will be aligned in a manner that best support States in improving results for infants, toddlers, children and youth with OSEP – Results -Driven Accountability Primary Monitoring Focus (20 USC 616(a)(2)) is Improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities versus ensuring that States meet IDEA program procedural requirements. R DA 1

Upload: zeal

Post on 14-Jan-2016

39 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Primary Monitoring Focus (20 USC 616(a)(2)) is Improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities versus ensuring that States meet IDEA program procedural requirements. R DA. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

All components of an accountability system will be aligned in a manner that best support States in improving results for infants, toddlers, children and youth with disabilities, and their families.

OSEP – Results-Driven Accountability

Primary Monitoring Focus (20 USC 616(a)(2)) is Improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities versus ensuring that States meet IDEA program procedural requirements.

RDA

1

Page 2: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

CollaborationCollaboration

Technical AssistanceTechnical AssistanceAccountabilityAccountability

LeadershipLeadership

OSEP – RDA

Strands of Action 2

Page 3: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

RESULTS-DRIVEN ACCOUNTABILITY

Services include the distribution of resources with or without a direct request for the info.

Support provided to multiple sites based on common needs in a few specific areas.

Support provided to select sites. Services are a negotiated set of activities designed to reach a valued outcome.

3

Page 4: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

SPP/APR measures compliance and results

Determinations reflect performance for results and

compliance

Differentiated monitoring and technical assistance

that supports improvement

OSEP – RDA

4

Page 5: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

A comprehensive, multi-year plan, moving from individual indicator improvement activities to broad strategies focused on improving

results for students with an IEP.

New OSEP Proposed Indicator

New OSEP Proposed Indicator

FFY 2013 to FFY 2018

FFY 2013 to FFY 2018

Comprehensive, ambitious yet

achievable plan

Comprehensive, ambitious yet

achievable plan

A “significant piece of work”A “significant

piece of work”

Will be used in determinationsWill be used in determinations

SSIP

State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)

5

Page 6: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

SSIP: Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015)SSIP: Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015)

DATA ANALYSIS

IDENTIFICATION OF THE

FOCUS FOR IMPROVEMEN

T

INFRASTRUCTURE TO

SUPPORT IMPROVEMEN

T & BUILD CAPACITY

To determine the areas for improvement➲ Report analysis methodology, data quality issues, additional

data needs➲ Identify compliance issues that are barriers to achieving

improved student results

Theory of Action

(IF-THEN…)

6

Page 7: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

DATA ANALYSIS

IDENTIFICATION OF THE

FOCUS FOR IMPROVEMEN

T

INFRASTRUCTURE TO

SUPPORT IMPROVEMEN

T & BUILD CAPACITY

SSIP: Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015)SSIP: Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015)

Identification of the Focus for Improvement➲Describe strategies that will lead to a measureable student-based result➲Demonstrate how strategies will build LEA capacity to improve student results

Theory of Action

(IF-THEN…)

7

Page 8: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

DATA ANALYSIS

IDENTIFICATION OF THE

FOCUS FOR IMPROVEMEN

T

INFRASTRUCTURE TO

SUPPORT IMPROVEMEN

T & BUILD CAPACITY

Theory of Action

(IF-THEN…)

SSIP: Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015)SSIP: Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015)

Describe within the State System regarding:➲Decision-making process➲Representatives that must be involved in planning for systematic improvements

8

Page 9: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

DATA ANALYSIS

IDENTIFICATION OF THE

FOCUS FOR IMPROVEMEN

T

INFRASTRUCTURE TO

SUPPORT IMPROVEMEN

T & BUILD CAPACITY

Theory of Action

(IF-THEN…)

SSIP: Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015)SSIP: Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015)

➲ State analyzed capacity of its current system to implement & sustain evidence-based practices (state & district level)

➲ Strengths, weaknesses, & coordination of governance, fiscal, quality standards, PD, data, TA & accountability

➲ Analysis of any initiatives in the State which may impact SWIs9

Page 10: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

DATA ANALYSIS

IDENTIFICATION OF THE

FOCUS FOR IMPROVEMEN

T

INFRASTRUCTURE TO

SUPPORT IMPROVEMEN

T & BUILD CAPACITY

Theory of Action

(IF-THEN…)

SSIP: Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015)SSIP: Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015)

Based on the State-identified, measurable improvement in results for SWI ➲Describe the strategies & outcomes that will need to be met to achieve the identified results➲Describe the changes in the State System, districts, & schools and provider practices that must occur to achieve the identified results

10

Page 11: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

INFRASTRUCTURE

DEVELOPMENT

SUPPORT FOR LEA

IMPLEMENTATION OF

EVIDENCE-BASED

PRACTICES

EVALUATION PLAN

SSIP: Phase 2 (submitted in Feb. 2016)SSIP: Phase 2 (submitted in Feb. 2016)

11

Page 12: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

INFRASTRUCTURE

DEVELOPMENT

SUPPORT FOR LEA

IMPLEMENTATION OF

EVIDENCE-BASED

PRACTICES

EVALUATION PLAN

SSIP: Phase 2 (submitted in Feb. 2016)SSIP: Phase 2 (submitted in Feb. 2016)

12

Page 13: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

INFRASTRUCTURE

DEVELOPMENT

SUPPORT FOR LEA

IMPLEMENTATION OF

EVIDENCE-BASED

PRACTICES

EVALUATION PLAN

SSIP: Phase 2 (submitted in Feb. 2016)SSIP: Phase 2 (submitted in Feb. 2016)

13

Page 14: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

SSIP: Phase 3 (submitted in Feb. 2017)SSIP: Phase 3 (submitted in Feb. 2017)

RESULTS OF ONGOING

EVALUATION

REVISIONS TO SPP

14

Page 15: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

RESULTS OF ONGOING

EVALUATION

REVISIONS TO SPP

SSIP: Phase 3 (submitted in Feb. 2017)SSIP: Phase 3 (submitted in Feb. 2017)

15

Page 16: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

FUTURE: PROVIDE INPUT DURING ALL

PHASES

How does it affect me?How does it affect me?

TODAY: SUGGEST AREAS FOR ANALYSIS

16

Page 17: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

17

Page 18: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

18

Page 19: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

19

Page 20: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

20

Page 21: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

21

Page 22: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

22

Page 23: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

23

Page 24: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

A Responsive, Durable System…

24

Page 25: OSEP –  Results -Driven Accountability

Draft Action Timelines

25