origin of the unit membrane concept

28
PartC Electron Microscopy and X-ray Diffraetion [nr, ited Papers Origin o~ the Unit Membrane Concept ' By J. D. Robertson ~ Dep~rtme'n,t of Neurc,patho,l,ogy, H,ar~ard Medica ~. Scho,o~, Belmont, Mass,a&usett.s, U.S.A. With 22 Figures The p:ap,er~s i~nelud,ed in :t,h.Ss volume are o,f ~two .kin,d,s. F'.irs.t, t,here are ,short ones presenting the results of recent research as presented at the Fraseati Conference. Since, however, it was planned that the Fraseati Conference wou, ld 5,e the firlst ~of .a serli.es, it was ,fett t,ha,t ~the eol~eetiion .of !papers ,ought to include a few invited longer ones of a more general survey nature to bring the sGort, er ~p,a~per:s ,iatto bet,her p.erts?ectiv,e. I wtats ,a,sked t,o wrilt,e such a pap,er ~dea~ing w.~t,h ,the n~it m,e~nbrane, i ~ceepted witch istorne reludanee beeattse ! ~hav,e revi.ew,ed t'hi,s s:u'b~eet several ~li~n,e,s ,already lin r~e,eent ye.ar*s. However, [ .e.or~se~l.t,ed t,o ,do, this in ttle ~n,~,er,e,s~t o~f 'mak!in,g ,the wh.o)e volume m,or~e useful ,a's a ,ge~er,M ref,er,enee t~o.;smdent,s. T;o tho,s,e who have re~d ,other reviews By me in recent years, there is little new in the present article. I,t 4s ad~dr~e,s~s.e,d o,nly Lo ~thas,e who a.r.e u~fam,illi,ar ~it,]a 'the ,evohltlioa .of ~t~,e um't bme,~brane .eo,neept. Currem thou:~hts about membrane ~str.ue~ure ~ha~d their eiarlies~t ,orion 'in the work .of O v,er t ,o n [1] ab,o,uut the t,urn of 4he .cem,ury. lie no,ted that eerta:i,n ,cell ,naemlbr:a,n.es ~ere mo,r,e ea.si.ly '.pene:t'rated by ,eom*poun~ds wi,th a hligh ,li,pid solub,i}icty ~than ,o.n~es 'th,~t were mare polar ,or wafer ,s,o.lu~b~.e. This led J~im t,o p.o~st,ulate that there might be a ~ip:i,d .eo,mp.on.ent 411 ~the anean- b`ra'n, es ,f.hat affected ,eer, tain f~eature~s ,of me,mb,van.e vem'aea.hi~ity. I,t was already we}l ,est,ablis,hed from ,the !previ.o,us ,eenfu,ry ~that ~ele,ctrieity ~as in ,so~e way a~s~s,oeiated wi~t.h ceil membranes. T'hu,s ,d n B o. i ,s - t/,e y :m ,o n d in i849 [2] ,ha,d noted tbat ,a s~.oltage eouM b.e d.eteefed in nerves a:t ,rest. Later on, B ,e r n s t e i n i:n 1868 [21 r:eati,zed that in ~th'e r,eslt~ing .s,tat,e ,a n.erv,e ,or mu.s,cte fi~b,er .had an exees:s .of po~slit~iv,e ions on tthe ~outsid,e .anLd neg,a,tiv,e ones on ~h,e i~sd~de. I,t i*s relevant t~o O.oin't ~oat that M a t t e u e e i tin 18~2 [2] t~a,d deano,ns,tra~t,ed a r,educt'ion lin t,he st.ea~dy pot,e~i,al ,between t.l~e ,eu~t er~d ,of 1 Supported by Grant B-2665 from the National Institutes of Health and Grant B-5128 from the National Science F.on~dati~n. 2 Present address: Dept. of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A.

Upload: j-d-robertson

Post on 10-Aug-2016

224 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Origin of the unit membrane concept

P a r t C

Electron Microscopy and X-ray Diffraetion

[nr, ited Papers

Origin o~ the Unit Membrane Concept '

By

J. D. R o b e r t s o n ~

Dep~rtme'n,t of Neurc,patho,l,ogy, H,ar~ard Medica ~. Scho,o~, Belmont, Mass,a&usett.s, U.S.A.

With 22 Figures

The p:ap,er~s i~nelud,ed in :t,h.Ss vo lume are o,f ~two .kin, d,s. F'.irs.t, t,here a re ,short ones p resen t ing the results of recent research as p resen ted at the F ra sea t i Conference . Since, however , it was p l a n n e d tha t the F rasea t i Confe rence wou, ld 5,e the firlst ~of .a serli.es, i t was ,fett t,ha,t ~the eol~eetiion .of !papers ,ought to inc lude a few inv i ted l o n g e r ones of a more genera l su rvey na tu r e to b r ing the sGort, er ~p,a~per:s ,iatto bet,her p.erts?ectiv,e. I wtats ,a,sked t,o wrilt,e such a pap,er ~dea~ing w.~t,h ,the n~i t m,e~nbrane, i ~ceep ted witch istorne r e l u d a n e e beeattse ! ~hav,e revi.ew,ed t'hi,s s:u'b~eet severa l ~li~n,e,s ,already lin r~e,eent ye.ar*s. However , [ .e.or~se~l.t,ed t,o ,do, this in ttle ~n,~,er,e,s~t o~f 'mak!in,g ,the wh.o)e vo lume m,or~e usefu l ,a's a ,ge~er,M ref,er,enee t~o. ;smdent,s. T;o tho,s,e w h o have re~d ,other reviews By me in recent years , there is l i t t le new in the p resen t article. I,t 4s ad~dr~e,s~s.e,d o,nly Lo ~thas,e who a.r.e u~fam,illi,ar ~it,]a 'the ,evohltlioa .of ~t~,e um't bme,~brane .eo,neept.

C u r r e m thou:~hts about m e m b r a n e ~str.ue~ure ~ha~d thei r eiarlies~t ,o r ion 'in the w o r k .of O v , e r t ,o n [1] ab,o,uut the t,urn of 4he .cem,ury. l i e no,ted tha t eerta:i,n ,cell ,naemlbr:a,n.es ~ e r e mo,r,e ea.si.ly '.pene:t'rated b y ,eom*poun~ds wi,th a hligh ,li,pid solub,i}icty ~than ,o.n~es 'th,~t were mare p o l a r ,or wa fe r ,s,o.lu~b~.e. This led J~im t,o p.o~st,ulate t h a t the re migh t be a ~ip:i,d .eo,mp.on.ent 411 ~the anean- b`ra'n, es ,f.hat af fec ted ,eer, ta in f~eature~s ,of me,mb,van.e vem'aea.hi~ity. I,t was a l r eady we}l ,est,ablis,hed f rom ,the !previ.o,us ,eenfu,ry ~that ~ele,ctrieity ~ a s in ,so~e w a y a~s~s,oeiated wi~t.h ceil membranes . T'hu,s ,d n B o. i ,s - t / ,e y :m ,o n d in i849 [2] ,ha,d noted t b a t ,a s~.oltage eouM b.e d.eteefed in nerves a:t ,rest. L a t e r on, B ,e r n s t e i n i:n 1868 [21 r:eati,zed t h a t in ~th'e r,eslt~ing .s,tat,e ,a n.erv,e ,or mu.s,cte fi~b,er .had an exees:s .of po~slit~iv,e ions on tthe ~outsid,e .anLd neg,a,tiv,e ones on ~h,e i~sd~de. I,t i*s r e l evan t t~o O.oin't ~oat t h a t M a t t e u e e i tin 18~2 [2] t~a,d deano,ns,tra~t,ed a r,educt'ion lin t,he st.ea~dy pot,e~i,al ,between t.l~e ,eu~t er~d ,of

1 Supported by Grant B-2665 from the National Institutes of Health and Grant B-5128 from the National Science F.on~dati~n.

2 Present address: Dept. of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A.

Page 2: Origin of the unit membrane concept

J. D. Robertson: Origin of the Unit Membrane Concept 219

a antrs,cl,e ,art~d 2,t~s< lin,ta'ct s,urfa.ee ,dur ing :~e~a=i,c <a.cti.~'fy. Tlri.s is ~ w n~rd.e,r- ,st,a,rrd.abl,e ~n ,terms ,of rep,e~i,fiwe <dep,ola~i.za~t,i,on o f ,the fkber:s. A ,d r i a n in 1911 [2] ~a,a,d es,f,a~l,is~ed ~ e a.U .or .n~o.t~i~rrg ,rrat'ure ,o,f ?dae .aetqo~n ,p,o~ent~i.al .o,f a .rrerve f iber ~and i:t w a s real, i,z,ed ttkat t~h~s w,a~ .lar:g, e ly ~a m,exrrbran, e ptre- norfmn,on. T?mrs ,ea.rly ~ri ,ttl, e ,p~res.en,t .ee,irfury, a eo.n,eept h,a,d ~grn~wn u,p Ifhat

Fig. 1. Lipid molecules are indicated by a bar and circle. The bar represents the non-poplar carbon chains and the circle, the polar ends o.f the molecule. A mono- mnleeular film of lipid molecule's is depleted .on a water surface indicated by gray

stippling.

FO RC E ~ , ~ 0

AREA

Fig. 2. Fig. 3.

Fig. 2. A diagramat ic force area curve. Force is depicted as increasing on the or.dinant and area on the abcissa. As the force applied t.o the film increases,, the area decreases until there is a break in the curve as shown. This point of dis.c.on- t,inuity is the minimal area of ihe film and from it the area occupied by the head

of each of the lipid molecules can be calculated. Fig. 3. Diagram taken f rom G o r t e r and G r e n d e 1 [~1 showing their conception

of the lipid bi layer in a red blood cell membrane.

~tte.re w.a,s ~a discr,eie ~i.p,i~d c o n f a i~ ing anem br,a.rm a:s ~tre surf~aces ,of ,cel~s wt t i ch i~n ~h,e case .of rrerve,s> v~a~s ,as,s,~ciai,ed w4,t~a ,a~n el~ectrica..1 p,o~e~nili.al ~gra~d,i,e~nf nrs wel~l ,as ,d~iffere~i.al 9er~ne,al~ilify I~o. ~ir~rrs arrd .o.~her oopmp,on~d~s.

I.n 1917 J~ , an g m u i r [31 .l?.ubl,is<hed ~i.s .p.i~o.rre:el~i,rrg e~p.er i~me~s ~o,n ~.oxto- n~ole.cu,l,al: fi.lms a n d pro~i,d,ed la 43rm Ibas,is fo r ~o,u~ ct~rrenrt ,eoEn,ceptlio,n,s o,f rrre.mbr:a~e rstr~rcftrre. I-re ,s,ho,wed .tJhat ,]Jipl~d m~o,~ecufes, ,eo,u~d ibe ~ d e t,o, s ,pread .o~ut ,~n ,a w a t e r : surface a'f .an ,air vza~t,er i infer face w~~lh :~eJir ~pol, a r ,er~d,s 9,o~nt-

Page 3: Origin of the unit membrane concept

220 ]. D. Roberts on

,i.n)g ,~ow.a'rd 'the v~a`ter ~s,trrf~aee, arrd the i r nien-p,olar carb,on ,drains is,tand,ing ,on end nex`t to the ,air int,erf,aee. H e fo,un,d `tha.t 'it was p,o,ss~ible ~o cocrrpres,s these fi.l~s lin ~such ,a w,ay ' that `t,he mo~ec~les ,came v e r y .el,o,se tog,ether w,i`th `the car~b,~n ch~i.r~s et~s,ely ~.ael~.ed ,as 'i~rdli.,cated ,i,n th'e &i, ag ram i,n F~i,g. t. By ',the trse ,o,f .f,orce a rea cu rves l ike t ha t in F,ig. 2, h e ~ a s . ~a!ble 't,o ,show ~th~t the re was a d,efirrit,e ,s~lrf,a,e,e .t3ressur,e ,a~s,s~rci, a~ed wi th 'the film. ~h,e ip,eirrt o f max,inau,m pressure be fore b r e a k a g e is no ted by the d i scon t inu i ty in Fig. 2. At this po in t the molecules are as c losely packed as t hey can be in a single mono laye r .

EXTERIOR

, ~ I ,' I # , @.,.@.,@,.@.,.@., @,

LIPOID

INTERIOR Fig. 4. The origin.a] Danielli-Davs.on pauci-moleeular melnbrane model [71.

Above this po in t the film collapses as the m o n o l a y e r buckles and becomes mul t i l aye red . The area occup ied b y each po la r g roup at the m a x i m u m pressure be fo re b r e a k a g e was ca lcu la ted f rom the chemical ev idence avai l- able about the s t ruc tu re of the molecules involved and f rom knowledge of the exac t n u m b e r tha t had been p l aced on the surface.

T, ke rrext ~s`t,ep d~ .t~lre ~evolut,i,o~n .of ,ou~r ,id,eas ,came Li~n 1925 w~hen G o r t e r arrd G r e n ,d ,e 1 [41 !p.trb~i~s,h~d the i r work ,o,n the ~s`tru,cmre of Jauman red ~blo,od cell ~membranes. T ~ e y ,u,s.ed ~f,h,e ~eeh~iques evo,lved b y L a n,g m ,a i r and by H a r k i n s et al. [5] for the s t udy of monomoleeu l a r l ip id films. T h e y ca lcu la ted ~the ~o.~al a r ea ,of a le~own numlb,er ,o,f red ,ceils a.rrd ex~rae`ted *~e ~,o,t,d .~i,p:id ~pr,es,en{. T..h, ey `tlhe:n ~e.~rs,u~ed ,the to,t,al ,area ,o, ceu,Fi,ed ~ y the ex,$ra'ebed I,~pMs l)y q3~o`t:~ing a f~or'ee ,area curve. T&ey .eo~clud,ed tha`t the re wals j~st ~s!affi, ci,errt ,~ip,~d i,ll ,~a,e red l)lo,o,d cell su r f ace ~o f, arra ,a ~,iln.&ectrlar leaf le t as dep ic t ed in Fig. 3 t aken front the i r pape r . The i r results were sub jec ted t,o c:o~rsi, cLe~albfe .e~i`t,~ci~sm an, d t he re were Chose wh,o h,eLi,ev.ed tha`t r me thod of .cal~eul,ar the :surfa.ee ,area ,o,f the red ceIfs was ne t ~a,ceur, a te aIrd thaX ~he ~met,ho,ds ,u~sed t,e ,ex`tra.ct `the }i'p,i~d were .n,o,t ,a,d,equ~aCe ,f,or ~o,`tal ,ex`tract~on.

Page 4: Origin of the unit membrane concept

Origin of the Unit Membrane Concept 221

Tirer,e w,as an,ot~her so ,~ce ~of e r ro r !i,n ~trat ~hey d id ~ro~ t ake ~m,o accoun t t,h,e defiui.te degrees ,at ,solu~i~i,ty ~f ~some ,of tire l il31id ,eompro,nen,ts dn ~ a t e r . Never - tir, dess , b y a f~ortu~n,a*e eorubirrafli,on ~of ,eircun~s~anees, ~ e i x ,eouclusi,oaas seem, in ~ t r t ,o,f ,pmseut knowlecLge, t.o h a v e l~een ,es;serr%a,lly correc t .

Duri.rrg tN~s o,eri.ud it is ~i,mla,o~ta~t t,o n,o,te ~the ,e:~perimen.t repor~ted b y M u d d and M ~u d d 1931 [6]. q~hey set nla ,an ,oi$I ~ a t e r ~rtter:faee n nde r a cover ,slit 9 o,n ,a m!i,eroseope s~de arrd .s4uffi'ed ~ .e beiravior ,o,f ir~rman bl~o,d eel,~s ~rt ~d~e ~xrterf~aee. T h e y ~r~Sed ~tir,a~t ~ed ,b]~aod ;eel~s ~se~eet, ive ly emt.ered tire o,il pira~se wirile ~hi6e ~blo,od eel~s,e,Ir't.ere,d ;the aqu,eous ,pir~se. T h e y iaa.terpreted /~heir res,ults ,a,s !in,&iea,tilng ~tir~t '~,e red bl~o,od cel l surfa~ce ~i]s irpd~ro.pirobi,e arrd the ~iri.~e ~blo,od :cell ,sur,faee 5Is ir3~dropiril, ie. I .sha,H relier ,to t~is experimma~t ~ater ,o,n ~in eous~der~ng our p resen t c,oamep:ts ,of the s~ructure of fire uni t m,e~brtan,e.

L: lipid Pr: protein

Fig. 5. Diagram from W. J. S ch m i d t [15] sh.owing hi.s conception of the orga- nization of lipid and protein in the myelin sheath based on polarized light studies.

D uri~rg #)re 1930':s '~irere were ,several siguifi,calrt :s,t,e,p,s th,at .led up ~o hire s,o-ealled p.an,ei-,m.o,l,ecular ~theory of cell ,mem~br,an, e stru.cture t irat wa,s advanced ,by D a n i e J l i and D , a v s o n ~n 1935 [7]. F!ir,st, C o l e ,dem- ons t ra t ed in 1952 [8] t ha t the su r face tension of sea urchin eggs was less t han 0.1 ,dy~ne p e r cent imeter . In 1954 H a T v e y ,aI~d Sir i ~ i r,o [9] measu red t.]~e ,s~tr~aee k e~us.i,on o,f ro~il ,dr,orpl'ets ~i,us,i,de ma~ine eg~s ~ y a v e r y d i f ferent t,ech~rrique. C o 1 e irad ~marcLe iri,s m.easntrements ~ y aao~in,g tire ~oree requ i red t,o ~o,nrpres,s ,an e~g ~etwe,en tw~o thiaa glass ,s,urfaces. H ~a r v e y .and S h i p i r o me,asured tire snrf~ace ite~s,i.~n ,of ,o~il ,droplets ;by ~usi.I~g ,a cen t r i fuge ~micro,s,eo.pe me thod ~i,n ~wirich tire ,centrdf,ugal ,fgree requ i red .to b r e a k .o~il d rop le t s i~nto sin,oiler ,o~res was measured . He re a f igure o,f ,as 0.2 d y n e p,er c,enti,nmter wa,s o,bt,a,ined. I t was ~ n o w n ,that ~ o s t o,f ~h,e JoJi~s th~a:t were p resen t in ~he o,il drog,let,s ~of ~sea aa,r,clrin eg~s ,as wel l .as m a n y t a~e r l~9,id eo,rrrp,o.m~d~s wa,s in tire range ,of ~albloat 10 dyrms ~p,er centianeter. T[irese ,o~il drep$et surf.ace ~tens~on figures were, *th,e~efore, diffi,eul,t ito a,c.eo,um ~fo,r ~n ~.erms .~f a nro,d,e,1 s,u.ch a,s tirat 'pmpo,s,ed :by G ,o r t e r .aud G r ,e n d e,1. D a n ,i e 1 1 i ~a~rd H .a r v e y ~n 1935 [10], Ip,erf,ormed so,me ,experdaneuts ~nvolviaag ,t~e ,strrf, ace ~0ensi,o,n p r o p - er,ties .o,f r~acke~al ,eg~g ,oil and ,pr,o,pos~d tira~ tire 1,o~ ,strrfa,ce tens,i~n srri,ght be due to the p resence of p ro te in at the oil wa t e r in ter face . This led d i r ec t ly to t~ae ~pro,p~sal ~n 1935 [7] ,of the mode l sirown i,n F~i,g. t wki,ch ,is tire origiual

Page 5: Origin of the unit membrane concept

222 J .D . Robertsoa

D,a, ni,e.ll~i-D, av, s,o,n m.~d,el. Aeeo~d~i~rg ~t~o Shis, ~I~e ,cell an.en~brarre w,a,s c~rmeived 4o 'h,awe ,a ~i,pid core ~s She ~p~ol~ar ,en~d~s ,of ,fire ~i,p,i~d ~mo~ecules ~p,o~imirrg .ou,t- w a r d a'n,d ,covered ~on ~ea.ch ~s~ide 'by a ~o,nomo~ecul~ar fi~m ~of !profei.n. T h e y .4~d ~ro,t ,spec~.fy t~he .t.o~,al num'b.er ,of ~i~vid ,moleeule,s ~present because ,tlhere w.a,s n,o~hin, g 6n ,tlheir re~d.en.ee ~,hat ,al.lowed ~h~m ~t,o ~d,o s~o. The re was, ,h,owever, so,me e.-~iden,ee i,n ~t'h,e l~i4e,ra,ture .a't :t'ha:t ~t~i,me ~e~eerrr~n,g ,tih, e electr~ieoJ ~calp,a.ci,ty o,f ~s,o,~e eel4 ~m, embra~res ,a~rd flris was =f.ou.n,d '~t,o b,e a~'bo.~ ~o.n,e ,n~icrofarad. I t was ,al.so kn,own t'hat tire ele,cgrical res4stanee .o,f ~he an,em'brrane was ,abo,ut 1,000 ,t~o 100,000 O'hzn.s. In llBe .ea,se ,of ~so~re ,cell men~b,ra,rms,, i l w~s p,o,ss,i~ble

MYELIN SHEATH STRUCTURES

(RADIAL DIRECTION)

A

~CZZZS ~

~CZZZ Z 2 Z 3 ~ *-q=XZZ ~

C

il li; i i B D

Fig. 6. Diagram from $ e h m i t t, B e a r and P a 1 m e r [1Sl showing four po,s,sible arrangements of lipid and pr.otein in the repeating u~it of the myelin sheath. The

lipid non-polar chains are indieate,d by the tuning fork symbols.

t,o Lsay fI:om t'he measu red eapaci , iy Jt'ha,t ~t,t~e 't~riek~ress ~o,f ~he merrrbrane pro'ht~bly ,died .~o.t ,exceed 100 A. H~owever, .t~here were ,mea~s,ureaTrent~s ~of ere,c- tri,eal ,eap~re~ty ,of eer, tai,n ,mem~braams, n,otably ,o~f Jsk,etetial ,m~s,cle fibers i~n 'wl~i.eh ,t~h.e wal'u,es .o,f 4he ~n,ea~b.raaa.e ca,p,acity we:~e .such ,a,s ,tl~ ~su~gest ~a ,much grea~er ,fl~iek.rms.s.

In 1940 W a u g h and ,S c,h aa i t t [1 i] maAe s,orrr, e ,d41,ect ,mea~s,urement,s o,f the t'l~ick~ess :o,f red .'bl,o,od eel,1 .m, enrba, a.n~es using ,an ,i,r~s,tr~u.lrrextt call.ed t,tre "arrMyt`ical t~Ft,oseolp.e". Ttri,s inwolved e,ssent~ially a ,co~pLardsan rot i~he re- fle@ivi,ty o.f ,a igla,ss ~sur.face ,o,n wlri.e,h a ,meartbr, arm 'wa,s ,dri, ed. TGey ~rse,d the n~et,h,~dJs ,gha~t had ~been ,devel,o,p.ed Ib.y L a n , g . m ~ a : i r ,a.Ird B l o d g e l t [12] f,or ~,ald,rrg is,~ep fit.ms ,of 'b,arl~mn 'ste'a~a~e. In fllese filma,s ,bard, urn bst,earate ,is bui l t nO in st~e,p,s..on a g]Jalss ~s,~i,c[e ~it,h ,ea.eh ,s,~ep li~nvolving ~ll~e ,ad,di,t~ion o:f ,only ,(~im ,m,~Im,mo~eeul~ar filan. T,he r.etteet,iv~ty ,o.f eiaeh ~st,ep v,ar:i,ecl .in ~a ldnear fCa~s,l~i,on ~a~d the ,analytli.eal ].ep,go,seop,e was .essent4afly ~an ~i~nstru,ment v~hi.ch all~owecl ta co,rap,avis,on to 'be ~nade t) ,et~een 4he ref lect i~i ty ,o,f ,d,~i~ed re,d ,hlo,(~cl cell g~'hols~ ton a gla,ss s]$de a n d t'he r,e~ect,an.ce of ~a La.i~g, rrm.i~-Bfodg,~t't ~s,te.p- film. TJ~ey con.ef~ded f rom ~'he, ir smd.ies hhat ~he fresh ~a, sl~e,d r ed ,cell ,gh.o,st n~ean,hr,an, e ~.e,ats,ur~e,d alb.o,l~t 220 A !in ~,hiekn, ess an, d ,t'ha,t af~er ~Li.p,i,d ,extract ion it ~neas.ured .ah,o,ut 120 Y~. Tt~e ,d,iffie.u.lty wi~h tlai,s 'met,h,o,d, of .cettrse, was :the

Page 6: Origin of the unit membrane concept

Origin of the Unit Membrane C,oncept 223

pr,o!b.lean ,o,f removh~g ,all n,on-me,a~bra.n.o,t~s elen~ea,t~s ,t~ha~ rema~i,ned iat4.ache,d to fl:m maean~,rar~es ~,n .the ~r,ep,a~a:t~o~ .of e~he ~ed ,cell ghosts. T,h,e va lues o,bt, ali.ned w e r e hel,i.eved ~o, h,e ~dgh ]~,eca~,se ,o~f +his ,d,iffi,eufty.

E,a~}~er, S e h m i t t. B ,e a r ~ar~d P ,o n d e r i.n 1936 [13] h a d ,st.t~died ,the op~ea.1 or,o.pe~fies .of ih.e red ~l,o,o,cl .cell im.em,b~ane Sn ,polarized }igh,t ,and had dem,arts~t.r'ated .~ha t ~her.e wo~s a ,detlectaMe r a d i a l l y pos i t ive ~r,efr.i,ngence. So,me y~ear;s laCe:r, M i ~t e 'It i s o n [14] s,md~,ed '.~h.e .pr,o,p,e,r,~i,es }of l~ed Ib.lo,od ,cells ~in p,ol.arized li.ght anor:e .ex~e~s,ively a n d c(m,el~a4ed ~ha.t ~he rad,ial ~pos~i,Nvi~ty wa~s d u e t.o fo lded pr, o:tein ,eha,i~s ,arra~ge,d ma, di,atly ri,n ~a laye:r ~o.f t:he ,order o.f 0.1 t,o ~o.ne anSe.ron in thiekn.es.s. I t ~o.w algrpears, l to~ever , rthat t'his ,is no't

Table 1, Chemical Composition o/ JPuri/ied "Light" and "Heavy" Myelin.

Preparation no.

CHCla: CHaOI-I insoluble residue, % dry wt.

Proteolipid protein, % dry wt. Total lipid, % dry w~.

Cholesterol, % of total lipid Galac~olipids, % of total lipid Phospholipids, % of total lipid Plasmalogens, % of total lipid

"Light" myelin

I 2 3

1.1 1.1 0,8 21.2 21.1 21.6 77.7 77.8 77.6

25.9 26.8 28.3 28.2 29.8 29.7 42.3 43.0 43.6

- - 12.5 13.4

25.8 31.9 42.6 15.5

"Heavy" myelin

1 2 3

3.6 5.6 4,7 22.2 21.3 23.9 74,2 73.1 71.4

24.4 25.9 28.2 - - - - 29.4

41.4 -- 42.3 - - - - 13.6

5.8 23.7 70.5

25.1 29.3 44.] ' 13.8

s,o ,and t~hM :the h:ir,efr,i,n~en, ce ,de;tect.ed Iby S ,c :h an ~i t ~, 13 e a r ,a~d P o n d e r p~o~a~ly w~as [pro,dueecl .by ,,tLhe l,i~pii, d ~m, oiecuJ, e,s io.f !~h,e artei~br,a~e. Howeve r , t~ere s~ill mm.a,ins ,the 9.ossib~:~ity ~that rEhere i,s a ~ro~t~ial co~np;o,ne~t qa4t,a.ched ~,o tOae z, ed ,cell an, e~ raa , e t s :t,hM ~h.as detectable: r ad i a l l y ,po,st~ive hlir,efr,ing;e,n,ee ~ha,t s,i,m,ply ,adds 4,0 ~t,~a,t .o,f 4,he tip,~d.

I would l ike n o w .t.o ,t~urn ~LO anolther ~i.n,e ,of evi, d,ence r~lat ing to ,~Ge ~pr,o,blem of cell ,men*br,a,rm: s~truct,ure !fil~at [at first wa~s no,t quiJ~e Is,o ,dJi~,e,ct i,u its r d a - {io~sh,ilp ,~s we rmw k~n.ow ii;t &,o ,be. As a res/u}t of t,h,e ~s~tudli,es ,o,f W. J. S e h m i d t [15] .and ,of F. O . . S e h m i ~ t arrd ~a~s co,ffahorators [16, 17, 18J !i,n ,the la~te 1930's 4t was ,estahfi.s.hed tha t ,the io.W'i,e ia:vis ,of ~e rve r w.as va~d,i.al a n d ifllat tlh,ere was i,n'tr.ir~si.c .post,tire rla.dii,al birefr,~r~gen.e,e. T~hi,s po.sii,t~ve ra~c~i0al h,ir,efrir~g.en, e,e w,as fmrr~d ,to r,evemse tin s!i.gn 'up,o:n 4rea~men,t wi th li~p,id solven, ts [19]. Fr,oln ,su,eh ],ilnes ,o~f ,e:v~deace, W. J. S e,h,m i d t co,n.cl,trded .i.n 1937 [t5] .tha't ~t,he .my.e~in ;s~h!e,a~h was con:s.truot,ed o,f ,aft,ernatirrg layers ,of ~}iip/,d ,and ~0r,ot.ein .as ,i.n,d!i,eaf~ect ,in ,~he ,d~,~gram ~n Fdg. 5. I.n 1935, S .e,hm i ,t :t, B .e a r and C 1 .a r k [16] ,o~4~a~ned ~t.he fi.rs,t ,sin,all aa~gl,e X-r,ay di.ffract.i~o~a 9attterr~s frroan myel in . T h e y found ~ho:t ~t~ie ra,&i,al r e p e a t peri,od ~n f resh ,frrog ~ y e I i n ~ a s 171 A .a~d lin ~m,aan.m.al.i,an ~ay,eliat was 186 A. I~t was kn.oiwn froan var$o,us. &emi,eal st~a,d,ies ' that anye.}ixt .eo,r~tai:ned li,pid aa,d a pro'rein eall,ed .ne.u~,o.k.eratLn. T~a~s in 1942, S e h m i t r[, B ,e,a r ,and P a 1 m e r [18] we re ,ahl~e ~t,o 9ostu$a,te ,kl~a~t ~fJae r~d,i,M' .repeat~ia~g mri~t in ~lt~e ~ny, e}i,n sJaeMla mus,t con~t.ain .two t),}m,olecul,ar l~a,flets o,f ~i,pid ~i:th rass.ocialed ~n,on, o~ayers

Page 7: Origin of the unit membrane concept

Tab

le 2

. C

once

ntra

tion

s o]

Lip

ids

in

Gra

y M

atte

r,

Whi

te M

atte

r,

and

Mye

lin

o/

Hu

ma

n

Bra

ins.

..

..

..

1

0-m

on

th

old

6-y

r ol

d 9

-yr

old

Gra

y

Wh

ite

Gra

y

Wh

ite

Gra

y

Wh

ite

Gra

y

I M

atte

r M

atte

r M

atte

r M

atte

r M

atte

r M

atte

r M

atte

r M

yel

in

My

elin

M

yel

in

Wa

ter

To

tal

lipi

d

No

nli

pid

re

sidu

e T

ota

l g

lyce

rop

ho

sph

atid

es 1

To

tal

sph

ing

oli

pid

s ~

Un

iden

tifi

ed

Cho

lest

erol

E

than

e]am

ine

gly

cero

ph

osp

hat

ides

S

erin

e g

lyce

rop

ho

sph

atid

es

Cho

line

g

lyce

rop

ho

sph

atid

es

Sp

hin

go

my

eliu

C

ereb

rosi

de

Cer

ebro

side

su

lfat

e C

eram

ide

84.1

36.4

63

.6

20.3

5.

1

3.0

7.9

6.8

2.8

10.8

1.8

1.8

0.7

0.8

80.8

49.0

51

.0

20.3

14

.3

2.9

11.5

9.4

2.4

8.6

2.1

8.5

2,5

1.1

m

78.0

22

.0

31.7

24.7

3.0

18.6

14

.2

5.5

12.1

4.6

13.7

5.

1

1.2

83.2

35

.8

64.2

22

.5

3.8

2.9

6.6

10.6

3.6

8.3

1.3

1.0

0.6

0.8

75.5

58.4

41

.6

20.4

19

,2

5.4

13.4

8.6

3.5

8.3

2.7

12.8

2.7

0.9

80.9

19

.1

24.6

28.6

6.

1 21

.5

11.3

4.2

9.1

4.4

19.2

3.9

1.1

85.8

37.6

62

.4

21.2

5.

6

3.5

7.2

9.6

2.7

9.0

2.8

1.9

0.4

0.5

77.4

66.3

33

.7

25.9

19

.9

7.3

13.2

12.0

5,

1 8.

8 4,

9

10.5

3.9

0.5

78.0

22.0

31

.9

25.0

2.

5

18.6

14

.2

5.5

12

.2

4.6

14.0

5.

1

1.3

82.3

39.6

60

.4

21.1

5.

5

5.8

7.2

9.2

2.9

9.0

1.9

2.3

0.8

0.5

All

val

ues

, ex

cep

t w

ater

, ar

e ex

pre

ssed

as

a

per

cen

tag

e of

th

e d

ry

wei

gh

t.

1 S

um

of

EG

P,

SG

P,

and

C

GP

. 2

Ex

clu

din

g

gaug

lios

ides

.

55-y

r ol

d

Wh

ite

Mat

ter

My

elin

75.2

--

64.6

78

.0

35,4

22

.0

21.5

24

.8

21.5

24

.5

6.5

~9.

0 15

.1

19.7

9.

1 1

1.2

4.2

5.3

8.2

8.3

5.2

4.4

12.5

16

.0

3.0

3.4

0.8

0.7

O

Page 8: Origin of the unit membrane concept

Origin of the Unit Membrane Concept 225

of p~mteirt ,o,f the ~g,e:nera,1 ty,p,e ,s,h,own lin the i r d,ia~gra,ms ,in F~ig. 6. Th,ere were a n u m b e r ro,f p,ossli,bd,l,i.ti~es f,o.r th.e sp,e,eific ~arra,ngement ~of 4,he 1,ip,id a n d n,o,n- li,p:i,d ,eomlpo,nents ,any ~o:ne o.f wd~ieh ,wonld ihave sa,tli,stied ,l~he, X - r a y d a t a t h e n a v,aiM,bfe.

Mor.e r~e,e,ent .eheml.eal la~a,alys,es ,of ~myeld.n h a v e .es,tal~il,ishe,d anore ,f,u.}ly t:he n,atur.e ,at :the ,fi~pd, d an,d ~noa-ldo!i,d ,eo~m~p~o,nents ,t,l~at ar'e !present. I,t ,i:s, kn~own tha t t]~e l,ip,ids ,are ,m.a:i,nly ~p,hos[plho,hlpd,d,s, eh.ol,eslt~er~o,l, .~aIaeto~}i,pids an~d

z - 7 0 + 2

r- J -q

U V Fig. ? a. Electron density plot for the repea,ting unit in rat sciatic myel'in from F i n e a n and B u r g e [26J. The two deep throughs neenr in the 1,oeation of the

two unit membranes. The origin "o" is at the center of the in,traperi.od line.

,w :~:.: .:::: ..::.: :.~,~:: ; ~ Cholest ero~

P 'T~ :;? :.i.! (ii:.[?~i: ]i: :'):::i;;~! P ~ P h o s p h o l i p [d

F~g. 7 b. Idealization of the electron density ctlrves for the myel.in layer of rat sciatic nerve in which thee }ocation of the 1.ipi,d Ml.ayer.s an the central p.ortions, of

the two unit membranes are indicated very s&ematically.

pl.asm~alo~gens, s p , h i ~ o myeli,n ,aa~d ins,o,s,itol ~p,ho:sp,h,a,t,i,d.e,s. Th,e pr:in, ei'p,al p,ho,s,pho,l, iRp,i,ds a r e phos,phatirdy] .eho]~in,e, p~h,os,p,h,altd,dy] ,e~han,ol amdne, ph,os- ph,a,ti,dyl s,erli,n,e. Tah,les 1 a,n,d 2 ,summ~arize ~the ],i~p,i,d e,o~mp.osi:f:i,on ,o,f nayelda as d,eterm.ined b y two J:eee,n,t in~es~tigatdoas [20, 211.

T/he p r o t e i n eo,mpio4n,en~t .o.f ,myefi:n cal.le,d n,ear, o,k,erati~n in 4Ge o,lder 1,itera- tur'e wa,s s 'lmwn b y lP ,o 1 .c h a n d L e B a r,o n [22] to 'be ~a ,degra'd.a;tion ,pro,duct of la ]?r~o~te!in ,a~hich ~!hey were lalbl.e ~to ,&,ara,et,eriz,e ,more ~ully .anld ish,ow ~fo ,b,e a oolm;po,ne,nt ,of a ,ela,ss ,of li~p~oLpro~te'ins ref,erxed ,to ,as ,pro,~e,olirpd~d~s. Pr,o4,eo- ].i,p.ilds a r e ,o,per, atio,n.ally ,define,d a,s a ~kiitd of lipo~prote,in w}~ieh d,s .ex4r.ae,ta~ble fr.om ;tiis,s.ues ,by a ~n~ixt,ure ~o~f ehloro,f,orm and a~etihanol ,in ~,h,e r,a~io .o.f 2: i. Mo,st ]:i,pLo,pro,t,e!ias are wa'tier s,o.lu~b.~e, b,u,t ~h4s k:i~,cl of li.pop~,ote,in li,s no,t ,and for til~is r,eas~on ,the ~.erm ,pr.o,teohpd~d w~s inven ted . T~tm ehenfi,eal com~p.osi~ion of .pr,oteo,l'i~p!~ds h,a,s ~.e,en ,ex,tensiv,ely stu.d!ied. T h e ~i,p,ild .ec~mp,one~ts ar,e v e r y s imi la r t,o ~ho,s,e o,f ,my,el.i~n and ,i~d.e,ed, i~ ~he mos t ~p,ure mye]~in fra,oti,ons a.hn~o,s,t 160% o~f ~lh.e ~pro~tei~n i's pr.o~teol,i~p,i~d proteiin. Reoer~tly, a,s ~the r,es'u~ of w o r k Joy M a t s u m o t o and M a t s u m o t o I25[ and T e n n e n J o a u I n [24],

P r o t o p l a s m a , L X l I I / 1 - - 3 15

Page 9: Origin of the unit membrane concept

:~e6 ]. D. Roberts on

it has been found poss ib le to r e m o v e the l ip id c o m p o n e n t ].caving b e h i n d t~he ,protein .in an undenatur ,ed crate i.n ithe ,s,e:n.s,e :that i t ,is st:ill .ehlor.oform- m, et~hano:l ,s,ol,uble. I t i.s, howe.vet, v e r y ,e,asiIy de,na.mr,ed 'by hea t , is, o,me dry,ing pr, o,eedures, ebe. T,be pro,t,ein i,s ,a~so wa' ter .s,olnbie ~ar~d this .opens up n u m e r o u s kinds ,of ..phys:ieal, chemical and ~b~i.o,physl}e,al ,s.i~di.es tha,t are n.ow ju~s:t ,begin- ning. The .am~in.o ,a,eid c,o~po~ss ,o.f ,a ,s,a.m:p}e o.f s,ueh pr,o,{eol,i,p,id Ipro~t,e'in is g iven in T a b l e 3 I251. This p r o t e o l i p i d p r o t e i n m a y tu rn out to be a struct~ural ,pr,o,t,e,in o,f .s!ignifieanee ,i,n a l l ,me,m,branes.

aJpid

Pro/eln ,eea.

Fig. 8. Diagram from F i n e a n [281 showing his conception of the arrangement of molecules in the radial repeating unit of myelin.

i{.eeent X - r a y i&i.ffra,e~t~Lo,n stfudi.e,s of n e r v e Imy,elin Ih,av, e led ,t,o .a refin,e.m,ent of ,the e a r l y aal.o,cl.els pr,ogo.sed b y S e h m i t f, B e a r ,al~d P a 1 m ,e r (Fig. 6) and a plo4 ,o,f it,he ,el,eetron ,d,ensitfy ,&i,str,i'bufFi,on :in the r,epeat,ing u.ni:f 'ha,s no.w been m,ade :to ~a reso.lu,f:i,o,n ,o:f abo,u,t 39 A. This w.~s. d,o.ne i i rde.pendent ly b y F i n e a I1 ,a=~d B u r g .e [26] ~aird 'by M .o .o d y [271. T h e .electron d.en,si~y p l o t of ~t,he r.e~peat~irrg ,u~Li~t g,iv,e,n ,by F ~i n e a n ,a~nd B u r .g .e ~s ~shown in Figs. 7 a and 7 b. Fro,m ~,he k n o w n ,d.eIrs,ilty ~of 't,h.e :pr:obein arid ~i.p:i,d .emnponel~t~s p m s e m in t,he ,mpe~in ish~elalth, ~lt ,i,s :now p,o,s,si.b,~e ,to s,ay fth, a t :the ,ffene.ral ,arr ,angement of ~the $ip,i,d .a,Ird non-lig;id eo.mpo,rre.nt:s ,given ,in F.ig. 8, t a k e n fr,mn an ea r | i e r pa,per b y F :i n e,a n [27], i.s ,esserr~ially eorr,ect. I t :shoquld b.e .noted t ha t t:be d.etaS~ed arran,g,ements ,such .a;s ,the ,s.hape o.f ~{he sphi.rrgo,mye.Iin :molecule an,d po,s'ilti,o~ .of ,elro].e,s,t,erol .~iven !~n .~he ,di,agrmn r.emai:n p u r e l y spe,eulat ive.

Page 10: Origin of the unit membrane concept

Origin of the Unit Membrane Co.ncept 227

Desp,i:te ;i~t,s ~l,im~itations ;thee e l e c t r o n ,dens i ty 'p,lo~t n o w ~prm~i~des ~t:he stre.nges:t ,e~i~cl,ence ~c,f ,the g e n e r a l .eorre.etrre.s,s ,o,f 'the .mc~d,el ,even ~t,h,on~gh :i,t was firs,t p r o - pc~s,e,d Jby F i n e .a n :in ,the lr~id 1950's [281 b e f o r e ~t,h,e r,e,ee,rrt X - r a y Id~ffra.eti,on e~i,dene.e wa.s a,zalifable. T h e m.o,d.el r,es,ul,tecl . f rom ,a ,eorrs~i,derati,on ,of .t,he earli.e,r X - r a y finfd~ilrg,s .o,f .S e h m :i 't d ,at ,al.; n e w e r res'u.tts ,of Fli n ,e a n anicl eow, o.rkerls ,as we l l as evMen,ee wki.eh w.a~s .d,eri~eJ , exc lus ive ly froan e l e c t r o n mier'o,s,co~py. I.n f ac t , :i,t se,em,s .fa,ir !to s a y f l int , ~in ithi,s ,i.r~st.an,ce, rthe eleetr~on mi.ero~sdeo~pile ,e~i, denee pro,~ide,d ~h~e h,est 5as!i.s f o r tJhe .nro,clef w h e n ,d.t w as orig~i,nally ~adv,aneecl ar rd w.e ~thu~s th.ave ,erie :i,n,st~a~ee ~in whi.eh 4d,ireet e.lee'tr,on mieresc.oop:~e ,e~ ideaee Ih.a,s le,d 'to a imo,~eeul.ar ano,d.el whi.eh ]aa,s h.e,en ~.u]> sequ ,en t ly e,onfirlmed b y X - r a y diffr,aetl~on. T]~i~ d~s n,at a ~rri.que si.tuati,o,n, h o w e v e r , .s,i.ne,e .the .int,e~rplay :of e l e c t r o n ~mi.ero,s,eo.pde ~a'rrcl X - r a y Id:iffraet,ion st'u, cli.es ,inwo,lvelcl ,in :the ewolu.t:i,o,n o,f o,ur ,eurren,t .i,d,e'as ,of ~us .e le stru.cXqlre p r o v i d e .ano, t,ker ,/,n.stanee dn wtrieh :i:t :i,s fd.iffieul't t,o 's,ay vztri,eh l i ne ,o,f ,evid.enee w.a.s me.s,t :i~n~plo,r't, ant .

[ rsih.o~ul, d l ike ,t,o . turn no,w anor,e s p e c i f i c a l l y t~o .tlh,e .el~eetron m:i,er.o,s,e.o.Fe s~t~t~d:i.e~ o~f n e r v e m y e l i n ~an~d ,i.rrclieale h,ow ~h,ey .are relate ,d ~,o, t h e ewo.l~u,t,io.n o.f 'the: g.enera,1 ~no~eeul.ar mo, clre] a n d Ira t h e ~g, en.er'a.1 !pr:ot)~ean .of meanI ) rane stru~c:/~u:r,e. I't was a.ss.umecl ,by S e h m :i ;t t .a~d la~i.s eo.wo:rk.ers, dn rt:he ia,t,e ~ ine- te,en ~th,irties :as we l l ,a.s o the r s work~ing ~in th,e fiel,cl t.hat/3r~o~b.lems o.f n e r v e myel]'in ,s~tru.eture ,were r .e ievant 'to. 't~ho,s,e ~o,f .eel] ~neanhran.e s . trn,cture ]9.ee,aus~e repel:in ~seern~ecl t.o ]3,e ~i.n s a m e w a y ,r,e~l, aftecl to m . e m b r a n e p~he,nom,ena. I:t was c lear , fo r ~i,n.s~t~anee, , that its ~pr,e~sen,ee la.a;d ,s.o,meth,ing k,o ~d.o. wit]a eo.n~cluet,i,on velo~ei~ty .'in per~}pheral myelin.a,te,d fibbers. H o w e v e r , tlhe ~e~caclt ~ a y in w h ieh i t was~ rda. tecl ,eo,uicl n.o~t 'b,e .exp~iei:tly s~t,ate,cl u n t i l ee.rt:a'in .el,e,etr,on mi,er~),s,ea,pe smdie.s ha, el ~b,e,en eea~le . te , d. T h e firs-[ ,s.te,p .in u.n,d,er.s,tan, cl;i~ng ,tlh[e n~,orp.ho- log ica l prrobl,ems ~eaxne, n,o,t f roan e l e c t r o n micro . scope stn, cl'i~es .of n~yel:in, b u t ra: ther fr,o~m s~tu, cl~i.e.s o.f n . o n - m y e l i n a t e d n e r v e fiber,s earri , ed. ~u,t ~ y G a s ,s e r in ,t~e .ear ly 1950's. Af:ter ,a lo.n,g a n d f rn i t f ,u l c a r e e r in phys,i~ol.o,gy, G a s s e r turne,ct ,h~!s dalan,d to. e~e.etron m~iems~e,c~py a b o u t i9'50 ]o.e,eau:s,e h,e w a n t e d t.o kllo,W .s,c~me.th'ing a,bou:t , t ie , s t ruc tu re ~o,f ~ fibers. U~p to fish,at ~ti~m,e, i~t h a d b e e n 13,el~i~eved ,that '~ fi~bers, o r n, on-myeli,nate~cl pe . r Jphera l n e r v e fib,ers, eo.ns.i,s,t.ecl of ]oun, cl,les ,of .axoa~s wh ich w e r e encelo.se,cl in , syney t i a i S.ehw.ann cells. T h e S . ehwann cel ts w e r e eoaee:iv,ed ,t,o 1).e ar'r~a~a~ge, cl a,s v, e r y long syn.eyti lal tu'b.e:s. T~he ax,o~,s w e r e tlh,o.u,gh~t 4o h,e: eom,p l e t e ly ,inelu, d, ed dn 4~he s y n e y t i a l cel l anas,ses. H,o,wev.er, 'i,n 1952, ,at ~tla.e C,o.ld S~prri,r~g H,arb,or .Syanp~o~si.um [291, G a .s ,s e r gave t 'he firs't rep ,or t ~o,f ~h~i,s {in, dd~n,g~s and: showed ' tlEat ~,h~e ax, on,s were no.t 'J~s,ol.ated w~i~fahi.n ~tre Sehw.a~n~ ,cell,s, Ib,ut ra,f~h~er tlaat ea,eh .wa~s e,on- neetecl ,~ro thee ,onlter s.urfa~ee ,o,f t h e S e h w a n n ee]~l Iby a ,tenu,o,u,s anemlb,ranous s t ru .e inre wh~i.eh he eon.ee,i,~ed ,o~f ~n gro,s.s m,o.rph~o,~ogieal :t,er~'s .as t).e,i~g a kd.nd ro.f anesen~t'ery, n,o,t .u.n,]~ik,e 't~a.at ,w~a~eh eo.rtrreets tthe {,~t.es~t,i,n,e wi4,1a t~he t),o,dy w a l l dn ~er~t,ebr~age,s. H e i therefore , :in.vented it,h~e: if,eran ~ for' t~h~is s~p,eeial s:trn.et'ure. S,u'b~sequelrt stu~d;i,es b y G a s s e r ~w.~h t,h,e a;s,s!isttanee .of P a 1 a ,d e [3.0], resM,t~d ,in .t.he c l e a r ,d,e'morrs~tra~ti,on ct,h,at fla,e me , saxon eon- s.ist:ecl s i m p l y .o,f .tah,e S,ehwa,nn ce l l .s'urf,a.ee ~menab~a~e 'inv.agfin.a4,ecl ~and e x - t.en, cl,ed ,to en.&ose th.e ,axo,n ,eo~npletely. L~f.er ,on ~i,t w a s ~sh.o~vn b y .t~h~e a u t h o r [31] :th~a't S ,ehwann ,cell ~neanbranes e o ~ i , st of a ..pair ,o~f ,den,s.e 1.ines

15"

Page 11: Origin of the unit membrane concept

228 ]. D. Roberts.on

each ,a~b,out 20 A tkiek separ'a,t.ed ~y ,a 1}i.g~ht een,tra.1 z,o,rm about 35 5~ ,a~er~o,ss t,o wh'ieh Lke ~s,p,ee!i.al ~e.rm "m~}t membr,ane" 'was ,a.plpl,ied. Tihe rel.a~t,ion~sh~i~p,s o.f ;t,t~e un i t ,me~xbr,a,nes .i,n no~n-~nye~ina~te, d nerve fibers ~ar,e ;as; ,sh,own ~in F,ig. 9. As the d!iagra~m ,i,ndieate,s, n,o,n,my,elli~n,~te, d n~rve: fi~bem,s eons4~s:t .of .S,chwann cel.~s w~it,h w,hl!,eh .axo,n,s ar.e relatte, d ~t ~t,h,e var,~ety ,o,f way,s shown. S,o,me ,of t'he axo,ns ~slimply fie ,in ,a,pp,o,si,ti.o,n wi~t~h .the S,ehwann ,eell,s wh,ile ,oit,her~s are pushed down ,int,o ,t,l~e~ ,to v a r y i n g ,&egre,es. W~i,th itlh,e ones ly~i.ng deepe,st, the ,tw,o enve~o.p.ing slheat.h,s ,o,f S.ehw~ann eyt, o~p]~a,san ~eame t.oge~t~her s~o tam/ t,heir .membranes ~i,e in .el,~s,e ap:po,si,t,i,o~n tto m a k e :the mesaxen. In ,adul, t fiS,er~s

Fig. 9. Diagram of a xert.ebrate unmyelinated nerve fiber. See text.

ther;e ,]~s .a ~,e.marka.ble unif.orani,ty !in {~h,e spacing ]3,etween :l.hLe tw, a .S.chwann cell me~mbr:anes !in the me,saxon w~h~er:e t.hey ,are s,eparat.ed 'by .a~b.o.uf 100 t.o 15/) A. Th~s .s,epar,ati,on is als.o .seen 5.etwe,en th, e S.d~w,ann cell ,mebmbr,ane and the ax.on m,emlbranes. Ther,e i~s t~hus a dir'eot ~pa,thway be tween tile surfae.e of tihe axon ,and ,the ,onts.i,d,e 'by m,e~an=s ,of t~his ~in.t.er-,m~embra,ne g~ap. T,he gap i.s c.o,nt.i:n.uro,U;S wi.th .ex.tr,aee,ll:ul.ar ,s,ubstanee. There ,i,s a cm~dens,at:i(on ,o,[ ex t r a - eetl'u}ar ,mater,ial .a'ro,unid .~he S,dlwann eel,l tha t ,i,s J varia~bSe th,iEd~ness and var!i.ab~e dens}ty dep.e~,dling ~'p,o,n how ,t.h,e ma{e~i,al i,s tr,eate, d. T,h:i.s &, shown by .~h.e l.ig,ht s.t, ipp}ir~g ,in F,ig. 9 wh}eh ,d,e~p~iets the .app,ear,anee .o,f flh,e so-eall.ed '%asem'ent m e m b r a n e " ,o.r '~ 1,an~na". The dr.awing wa~s .eo,r~s{ru,ei, ed mailnly fr,mn ~o~b,s,er, v,at~i,on=s o,f ,per,mang,ana{.e f ixed .materli, al ~an, d 'tLhe ~,as,emen,i ]am}na was aee,ordingly .s,o,m ewha t d,e-~e;m~pha,sliz,ed. If ,i,s .much ~more pr,o,min,en{ in 'OsO4 f ixed 'mat,er~ia,1 .and w:ith lead sta.i,rdng :it,s .pr,m~i,n,enee is fur,i~er enha.need. The re .are go,o,d r,eas,o~ns ,t.o ~b,eli.eve, ~b.eoa.u,s~e ,of ,sta:i,I~ing ,ehara.ete'r- i,stics, tha,t ,th,e: ba.s,emen,t fam.lina ii.s a ,e,on.de.l~s,ati.o,n ,of ex, teae,elfuil~ar ~s,ubs,i.an,ee w~t~h a h.i.gh ,Coherent :o.f mueo!poly,saeehar:~des. In m y <~p.ini,o.n, '~/:s suSsi'anee grades ,off ,~mper,ce~pttbly ~in~o 'd~e .exir,aeellular co,nt~numn a n d lalso ~im.o the gap ~in .{ihe ,mesax,o,n and the ,s.pa,oe ]~etween {he ax.o.n .airtd ,the .Sehwann cell

Page 12: Origin of the unit membrane concept

Origin of the Unit Membrane Co.ncept 229

m e m b r a n e s . I thus conceive o.f the gap subs tance as b.eirtg re la ted to the bas,ement .mem,br.ane s.ub,stanee and the genera l in te rce l lu la r m a t r i x . Thus ~t i,s pro,b.aBly hi,gh in muco,p.o.lysacehar.~de and mu,eo,prot.ein. The re is also good ovid.once for a s suming tha t it ~i.s abou t 90 % h y d r a t e d as I shall ind ica te la.ter.

Fig. 10. Reprnduction of the first micrograph sh.owing an outer and inner mesaxon in a myel,inated nerve fiber. This was obtained by the author in 1954 [45].

Mag. X 176,00'0.

In 19'54 G .e r e n [52] b,e,g~an a s t u d y .of the f.orma~ion o.f ne rve m y e l i n in eh,iek periLp,heral n, er~es. At .early s tages be fo re the a p p e a r a n c e of mye l in , s,h,e ,o~b.s~erv.ed t4h,at there were numb,ors of n ,on-myel ina ted ne rve fibers h a v i n g th,e g,eneral s:tr'ue.mr,e es.ta,bli.sh,ed b y G a s s .e r ]).ut in which there was on ly o.ne .Sehwan,n cell pe r ,ax.o.n. This led .her t,o po,s,t'ulat:e t ha t m y e l i n might , in fa,ct, , s imply b,e f .ormed b y .s,p.ira,1 wingding o,f a me,saxon ar,o,u.n,d the axo,n wi th .ee.n,d,ens,atio,n .}n.t,o t~he ,eo,mpaot my.el, in ,s,trueture. Thi,s was a ~ e r y in.t~eresting thy.p,otthesi,s, b u t .o,n t,h,e ev.i,d,en.ee ava,ila,bl,e a t the t ime, if wa,s qui.te p.o,s,s,ibl,e tha.t no.n-.membrano.n,s comp,on, ents were la id d,own ,between .the mem,branes .o,f t~h.e mes,axo,n 1,o,o,ps as m y e l i n fo,rmed even ,if the s ,piral l ing o.f ~'h,e mes,ax,o~n wa,s eo,nt,inu,ed d u r i n g devel, o,pment. The first s tep in .e,s.tab- ]~is,l~i:rtg .t,his hypo thes i s e,ame wit:h ,d,em,ons.trat,i,on of an ouLer and an inner mes.ax.o,n a,~ta,ch, ed to .eomp.aet m y e l i n .i,n a l i za rd m y e l i n a t e d n e r v e fi~b,er f rom

Page 13: Origin of the unit membrane concept

230 J .D . Robertson

the au thor ' s [,ahox,a.tory ~a f,ew ,mo,n.~hs aft.er G e 1" e,n',s hypot~h,esi,s wa~s ~d- w n e e d . T h e .o,riginlal ~mlier,o,g.ra~.ph li,s' ,r~epmd'u,eed ,in F~i,g. 10. T~h,e r,e,la~ti,o,nshi~p,s o,b,s..er~ed ,i,n th,is ',mi.cr,o!gr,a~ph str.o.rrg,ly .s.ugg~st,ed t h a t m y e l i n wa,s f o r m e d ,by a eo,nt:inluing re.labor,at,ion of ,tl]cm ,sp,isal Lmes~axon iseen ~in interlmed~iafe fi,b,er,s. I t wa:s :alts,o i m p o r t a n t ,idn Ithi~s ,c,oknnect~i,on tha t tlhe ~o;ut,er ,m.esax,on .ertt,er,ed the myel~in in a dire.cf,io,n .op,p,o}sli,t,e ,to. t h a t ,of ~tlhe 4~nn, er ane,s,ax,o,n. [.t was ,al,s,o p,o,ssibl:e .frem ,t,he r,el.at,io,ns.hip.s ,o,b,s,erv,ed :to ,st,alte witir tea,so,nab,re ,eerta.inty th~at :no extra-m,enlbran:ous ,mat,er4a.} 'was l~a~i,d d o w n fin tire ,cyto~pla,s:m hetwe,en the m e s a x o n lo,o,ps a,s the myefi:n ,s,he~a:~h ev,olve,d. Thins w a s ;ap,par,errt fr,oun the f~aet t h a t t~he m a jor dense l~ine ,m,ela,sur, ed o,nly ,a,b,ou{ 30 A li,n tlhi&nes~s, and was 'f,ormed b y .the ,int~imat~e ~appio,siti,o~n o.f .one ~of ,tlhe: Sehwann .cell .mean- br:ane.s .e~f rtll:e m,es,ax.o~n wdtir tlhe co,mpa.ct ~myelin. I,t was noit iposLs'ib,~e at !the t ime, howeve r , ~t,o ,st.a~e w~tuh ,eerta,ilrty t ha t the myell in wa,s ~matd~e ,o~nly .o.f S.ehwann ceil rnem,brane m:aterd,al ,b,e,cau,s,e t.he S,ehwann cell imel]rrbrane:s w,e,r,e v e r y fuz.zy :in ,ap,peaxanee .and .of ,i.n, defin'ite thiekn, es~s. Tire r'el,a=t:io~s.l~ip ,of the ~membral]eS m. t~e in~tra~perioJd fine o,f the ,r,epea,t!ing myel'i,n stru.et~ur,e eo,u}d not ,b,e mad.e ,o,ut wLt,h ,cl~arlity par , f ly ,b,eeau,s,e :the S.ehwann cell m~e.mbran.e ,at the su r face ,of r Sehwan,n cell ~extern.a.lly wa,s v e r y ,fuzzy and lin~d:efin,ite ~in app,ea.ran,ee. I~t was a~ppar,ent t h a t i t measur ,ed less t h a n 100 A :in t!hiek~ess bu t t ire pro,bfem wa,s ,how nmeh fes,s. In so,me places , it seemed t~o. ~m~ea,s,ure wel l unde r 50A. T h e ~po~s,sibi}ity t,hu~s r.ema,ined t 'hat extra-m,embrano,u.s m a t e r i a l m!~ghi b,e .aidd,ed ,between ,tlhe ,outside surfaee..s ,o,f the ~mes.ax, o.n m e m - b ranes ,a,s my~elin .ev,o~v,ed.

Tih,e ,s,olu;~ion ~of ~t~he pro,blem awa.ited ~he ,d.ev.eJop~ent of perman,g~anate f ixa t ion b y L u f t [531 w h o i n d e p e n d e n t l y r ed i scove red it in 1956 "~ as a su i tab le fixati ,ze f~o.r mem,brano,us s t ruc tures . Alt,h,o~ugh ~he t y p i c a l urri~t m,em- br!an.e p a t t e r n ~ a d ,b.een seen ~n o.u:r .la,b,ora~ory in 1954 4n ,squ,i,d n e r v e fib,er~s a:fter OsO4 fix.at!i,o.n :al~d ~n.ethacry~at.e ~embed~di.n,g, ,thi,s .a, pp,ear~nee w a s n,ot u.sually s.e,en ;and !its ' import ,anee was not a,t fir,st ap,precia~ed. Itt w a s .only a~t,er it w~s ~se, en in the m e s a x o n ,in refa~io'n to my~el.i~n ~that ~it!s ,stgn,ifiean,ce b e c a m e .e~e,ar.

As ~so.on .a.s we: ,b,egan 4.o ~us,e p.er:mang.an~e 'as a fixi~ng a~ent , .an, d ar,al~d~ife for em]3e, d,d:ing, ithe uni,t me:mtbrane p ,a t tern ;~ppeareld reg'u~ar,ly in aH .our eIeetr~on ,m'icro,graphs. F'/,g. 11 ris ,a ~mi.cr,o,grap~h ,of ,a hu~m~an r,ed ,b~o,o,d ,eel.1 t h a t slmw,s tlh,e ,u~nit mean,b.ra,n,e ~t 4ts su r face . ,Fi,g. 12 s,lmws tire two, un'it ane~n- b ranes .o,f .a mes,ax,on ,in ,a rmn-~npe,l~i,n~ted ~n,erv, e fi,b,er and F,i,g. 15 ,siro,wls ,t,he r'eI~a.tiorrsihilp,s ,og the tw.o ,un,it .m.embr:an,es to .eo~mpa,et ,myeltin in ,a tmyelina~t:in~g m.o,use ,seiat~e ne rve fi,b,er. Such ,m~i,cmgra~phs .a,s ,thins ,alto,wed an~ean:irrg to ,b.e a t tached t~o the u.:ni,t anembrane pat t tern a,r~d .h~,c~iea4,ed t~h~t th,i;s ~p,a.it, e rn , of the var;i,o~ns one.s ,o,b~se,rwed ~[n ~me,mbr,altes, wa,s ,a isi,gnifica.nt ,one. T h e y ,showed eo,n.e~usively .lira4 t,Im lintr~a~per,i,od li~ne .o.f myeldn w,a,s fm~me, d ,by t~he ;in,t,imMe a~Fpo's!i:t~i.on ,o~f tire 'two ,o,u.t,s~id,e: ,d~nse ,s,tra, ta .of :~h,e ,mtit membrane ,s tuek,ed ~n a t 4ire su r f ace ~of .the ,S,ehwa,n,n ,eel1 ,to ,make tire m,esaxon. T,hey ,eo,nfirm, eid the fact , ,sa~g,g, est~ed b y O.sO4 fix.a4,i~on, t ha t t~he 'maj,oa" Id, errs,e ]~in, e ,i,s, f;or,~ed b y the :intd~mat,e ,app,ositi,o,n ,o.f t he ,two ~irrsd~d,e ,dens,e s4rat~a ,of the itrlil,a.m,inar

a P.erm,an,g'a'n;a~te was o.r~ig,~n~ally des,eribed as a fixative for nerve in t.he last century by B e t h e.

Page 14: Origin of the unit membrane concept

~~

r C~

�9

Fig

. 11

. U

nit

mem

bra

ne

at t

he s

urf

ace

of a

hu

man

red

blo

od

cel

l.

Mag

. X

2S0,

000.

Page 15: Origin of the unit membrane concept

232 J .D . Roberts on

u~i~t. ~fih,e i.m.p,ortant e.onel~u~si,o,n w.a~s then r,e.ael~e,d t h a t extr.a-memb.ran.o~us ma.ter.ial was ~ot ine}u, ded d,u.r,i.ng 't.h,e f.o.rama.tli.o~a !o,f mpeI,i,n for there was roLam ,e,n~y {,or the .otb~serve,d rnembr:an,e ~mater~al. In,deed, ,t,kere i~s, ,if ,anythintg, a ~s[iglht .eoa.tra.et,ion ~o.f the uni,t mem~brane~s a,s they ,ent,e, ,the ,eoan,paet myel,in. I t wa.s a p p a r ' e n t fro,m these el,e:etr.o.n mi.er.o.seo.pieal s tudies t ha t the r e p e a t i n g unit in the myel ' in shea th wa.s s i m p l y the mes.axon and no.thing else. i t was

Fig. 12. Portion of a nonmyelinated nerve fiber in m.ouse seiatdc nerve showing the unit membrane of the axon and of the Schwann cell. A porti.on of a mesaxon appears in the upper center. Note the gap between the two unit membranes.

Mag. X 12'8,000.

fu r the r .a,pp:ar,ent on g,ro~u~rLd.s o,f ,sym~metry tha t ,this mu,st eorr, e,s~pon.d t,o the ra.d~ial repe,a~ting un.i.t ,defected in 'myel in b y X - r a y ,diffraot'i.o,n ,s,tu,die,s. To be .sure, the ,d.imensions wer,e r,e,d.uee,d b.eeause .o,f ,shr'inka, ge d,uring the lore- para.tLo,ry proeedur,e,s. T h e exa.et ~degr.ee .of .shr inkage iilvo~v,e,d was .st ud.i,ed b y F i n e a n [34] an~d l a i e r b y F . e r n a n d e z - M o r a n and F i n . e a n [35] b y a eombd~ae, d X - r a y ,di,ffraet~i.oa an.d elee.tron mier,oseo,p,ie ,study t h a t was of va lue in ,su,p,port,ing the b,el.iJ th,a,t the reduet, i.on 4n the r ad i a l r e p e a t fro,m ab,o,u.t 170 -185 A t,o. ,a.b,ou.t 100 120 A was due t.o ,shl, ink,age du,ring pr,e- p,armi.o,n. F,itg. 14 sum,marti:z,eLs .the sJtepp~s ~i,n the format ' i~n .of n e r v e ,myelin and have been w o r k e d out m a i n l y front s tudies of mouse sciat ic ne rve fibers du r ing the first f ew d a y s a f t e r b i r th .

Fr,o,m file above, i~ was po,s,si~ble to m a k e some ,d,e, duetio~l~s ,abom th.e .under- lyialig m'oleeu~ar .ar rangeanent r,e,s.p,o~i~s,i,bfe fo,r the unlit ~membrane ~patiern.

Page 16: Origin of the unit membrane concept

~.

�9 u O

r

Fi~

~. i

S.

~fo

un~

mou

,se

scia

tic

ner

ve

fibe

r sh

ow

in~

o" d

evel

.oui

ng m

yel

in s

hea

th.

No

te

the

rela

t, io

nshi

ps

of

the

un

it

mem

bra

nes

o

f th

e m

esax

on

to

th

e eo

mp

aet

my

elin

. M

ag.

XI6

0,00

0.

Page 17: Origin of the unit membrane concept

234 j . D . Robertson

The d.i,men~sio,ns and .t,he r,ela, t.im~s:h~p t,o m y e l i n aI].o.w,ed one :t,o s,ay ,th:at t~he urrd,er]ying m~ofecul.ar ~pattern w a s f ike ly t.o Ib,e !one ,of 4he ~tlr,ee p at4errrs ,in F~i.g. 15 a - c . A.s f a r as .th,e ehelrdeal a n d ,bi.oplayls,i,eal ev idence w,errt, ,at ,that t ime role e m d d no~t .eho.o,se h,etw.een :these th ree 9o,s,siiibdfitie,s. H~ow,ewer, ,studies of mc, clel sys,tem,s o,f pur,e ]lilp~i.d,s a.rrd ~pr.o4ei~ns so,on p.o~i.ntecl 't,o .f}m .aoCrect eh.e,i,ee .in t,he la,t.e ~[950's. I'i wa.s.w.e.ll kno,wn tha,t pr,o,min m,o~l,eeul,e,s, aft,er fixa+ion, embedddng and s,eeti,o,ning a p p e a r e d as rMh,er u r d f o r m den s,i,tie,s 4n

Schwann Schwann cy'toploem

~ / / _. _ C y t O p l a s m

AXOn

�9 i ' t membrane ~ ~ u n i t g(~p/ membrane membrone gczp membrone

0 b c

Fig'. l& Diagram summarizing the steps in the formation of nerve myelin. The mesaxon is shown .at "m." Nnte that the intraperiod line originates from appositi.on of the two out~s.ide surfaces .of the unit membranes of the me.saxon and the intra-

period 1.ine by apposition of the cytoplasmic surfaces of the mes,axon loops.

~ao~

~PO~

" , /X/VX/

b c

Fig. 15. The appearance of the unit membrane in electron micrographs is .shown to the left with the approximate dimensions. Three poss{ble moleeul,ar configura- tions are shown in a, b and c. The zig-zag lines represent non-l,ipid monol,ayers; the circles represent lipid polar heads and the, bars represent the non-polar carbon

chains of the lipid molecules.

ele.etro,n m~i,crographs, as, for inst,ance, in co[l.agen fi:ber~s or mvofiLam,enf,s. Not,e, f.o,r ,ins,tance, the r a the r u n i f o r m d e n s i t y o.f tlhe cryMa] ,o.[ ,ehy,m.o- tryps~inoge:n .in Fig. 16.

T~his ~spe.eimen was fix,ed, .mr~bedded and ,sectioned dn the s a m e w a y ,that a t i ssue .s'p.ec.ian,ell w.o,uld g a v e b,een handl,ed. O f eourse, tpr,es,eal4 Ld~ay anethods m'ig~t .b.e ex,p.ee~ed t=o y ie ld ~so,m.e signs o.[ . internal ,s.trneture .in ~s~,eh a e,rys.tal, bu t tki,s pr,epara'tio.n was .daaract,eristi,e ,of the o,ne,s availal),Le ,a't the t,irne b,ef.o~e 1960. The pietur,e o.bbtained fr,mn a l ip id ~st>eeimen was , howeve r , a t t ha t d,me a.s a't the p re sen t t ime, r;ad,ieally differ,ent. Ins ' toad o~f a ~no.r,e or l,e,ss u n i f o r m ,density .or g r a n u l a r a .ppearance , t he 1,ipid .sp,ee~me.n ap,p,ea.r,e,d as a s y s t e m ,o,[ r e g u l a r r e p e a t i n g ,den.s,e ,and 1.i~ht lines as in F~i,g. 17 whi.eh sh,ow,s a ~s!p,e,ei'nle,n of egg k e p h a l i n f ixed v~ihh 'Os'O~ ,e~n.bed~ded ,in ar:aldit,e, an'd ~sec-

Page 18: Origin of the unit membrane concept

O

2.

�9

,-r

Fig.

16

. C

ryst

al

of

chym

otry

psin

ogen

fi

xed

wit

h K

MnO

4, e

mbe

dded

in

A

rald

ite

and

sect

ione

d.

Mag

. ;4

28,0

00.

Page 19: Origin of the unit membrane concept

G~

r

Fig

'. 17

. S

peci

men

or

eg

g ce

phal

in

fixe

d w

ith

O sO

4, e

mbe

dded

in

A

r,al

dite

an

d se

ctio

ned.

Mag

. X

l,040

,000

.

Page 20: Origin of the unit membrane concept

Origin of the Unit Membrane Co,neept 237

t4one,d. T i re ,d,en:se f ines .here rrep.eat a4 a per i ,od .obf .ab.ou,t 40 A. T,hi,s rep ,ea t per'to, el ~i,s ,a'b,o~u't tire :same a.s tthe o.n,e f~o,und ~n .such ,sp.e,e~rrrens 5 y X - r a y d,J~f- fracr T,he g.erLer'al ,m,o,le'cular arra'nlge~mel~t ,of .su.eh lip'id,s ~,s k~nown go b.e Iik,e ~hat , shown .~n F~ig. 18 a. T~a, is i,s ,~tre ,mo,s,t e o ~ m o a ,fo,zm in vzhich 's,u,eh lilp,i~d~s .e~i,st. I t i.s .ealled the :smectic .s'~ate. C l e a r l y , t h e ,den.s,e :li'nes. s een ,in tire el~e,etr,o,n ~ticr.o,gra,ph~s anu.s4 r,e,pres,ent ,ei.t,Irer ,~he ~po,lar ,end,s .o;f .the .l~i,p!i~d m,o.]~e- cures o r t h e n, oln-,p~al~ar ,end,s ,of ,~he earb.on ,eha:hrs a,s lindi,ea.t.ed ~in b a n d c res,p,eetliwely. O n .the 5.a,s,i,s o,f tire cv~d:e.nee t~h.a't w e 'ira,d ,at t h a t t 'ime, ,any

Fig. 18. Lipid molecules as. in Fig. 15. "b" and "c" respectively sh.ow ~he po.ssible location of the dense strata in mierographs ,such as that in Fdg. 17 in relat'ion to

the polar and non-polar carbon chains of the lipid mo]eeul.es.

e,ne ,of the t,hree ,d~i~agrams i,ndiea~fecl tin F:i,g. 15 a - c eo.uld ex, pla~in tire urri t men4br:ane pwt~t,ern as .o,bs,erv.ecl ~in l~'i.g. 15 a ,prowid,ing eer t ,a in a.srs.u,m,p;t,i,oa~s w e r e ma,d,e. F:ies,t, ~t~e evi.den.ee ,se,em,eld q.u~ite a,dequ,at,e to ,a l low uts 't,o ass.ua~le t h a t ,pro.~e.ia .or .o,tirer aon-l'ip,id,s i spread .in ,a t h i n f i lm wo.u$d, ,in f i xed a n d e m b e d d e d mater , ia l , a,pp,ear ,a,s a ,tiri,n d e n s e :s,trat~u,m. Fro ,m F,i,gs. 1.6 a n d 17 i,t wa~s ,c~ear :tha,t ,ei,ther ' the a~i.g,ned ,p~ol,ar ~ll.e,ads ,or t h e no~n-p,o]~ar ,earbo,n .&ai,ns .of a ,l'ip~ifd mo.n.olaper wo,u~d .al,so a~ppear a,s a ~iri'.n ~dens,e .strat.um. I f -we as ,sumed .t,hat ,the .p,o.lar Irea,d,s wo,uld a p p e a r ~dens,e, mo, d,el ",a" (F~,g. 15) .co,uld ,be c o r r e c t ~sin, c,e .the ,d.enls,e Mr'ata fro~m h.o.t,h tire ,litp:i, cl ,ancl n,on-,llio!id w.o,ul,d summa,re . I f we a.s.s,umed, ,co~nv,ersc~|y, f i rm ' the n.on-.po]Jar ,ehMns w o u l d ,ap,pear d~en.s.e, "~ ,in F.igl 15 co,u.l,d .al~s,o, 33,e ,eorr,eet. I tow,ever , width ei.t,her .as:su~np- tio,n '~ c o u l d h,e ,eft,mini,areal heea~l,se w,e sLiro,ufd ,ei:$h, er .see t~tLis ,as a ,s.in, gle ,d.e~s,e ,st.ra~tu~m .or a,s t h r e e ,eloJse,ly , spaced ,d,er~s,e ~st~ata each s e p a r a g e d 5 y 1,i,ght h,a,n, ds. ,S~i~ee th,i,s was ,never ,o,b,s,er*eed m,o,d'el % " wa~s rea ,d i ly el, i~rLinaLed. I t was e~i,d,e.nt ,M tlhi,s ,p.oJs ,tha't ~a~e 'eo.ul,d d e e i d e u n m n b i g u . o n s l y ]o,etweeal

Page 21: Origin of the unit membrane concept

eas j . D . Roberts.on

nm.dels "a" and "b" if we eo.ul,d ,decide `between ~h.e .tw.o alt,ernat:ive i,nt,er- p re ta l ions of the dense bands in Fig. 17 as ind ica ted in Fig. 18.

We ,set a~b,otut :the ~s.o]utli.o.n ,o.f ,thi, s ,pro`bl.em ,by ~taki.ng a~dvant.age .o[ an exl>er!iment ,d,o.n.e b y S e~.m~i t t, B,e a r ~ar~d P a lm ,e r in 1942 [18]. This is ,ill,ust.r:ate, d 'in F'i,g. 19. Tt~ey ,showed .that a l ip id .in *he ,s,meetie s ta te as fllu,str,a't,e~d ,i.n F.ig. 19 a when ~hydra~t.ed, ,e.o,u,ld be eau,sed :to spl i t off' int,o i,n,diivi, dua] s 1,e,afl,et,s ,as lind.~ea't,ed :in Fi~g. i9 b ,in a revers ible fashi.oa.

YYYYYY

rrrrrr , 0 O0 0 0 O0 0 0

H20 O 0 0 0 0 o o o o

o o o

Q b

Fig. 19. Di;agram taken frem S c h m i t t , B e a r and P a l m e r [181 showing lipid molecule:s arranged in bilayers in the smectic state. In "a" water is excluded and the bilayers are closely approximated, in "b" water has entered along the polar he,ad,s of the mol.ecules split:ring .off indivi,dual bilayer,s and increasing the repeat

period a.s detected by X-ray diffraction from 65.7 s to ~27 3..

We rea,s~oned t,hat ,if w,e e,oul, d eau,s,e the lip,i,d s.p.eeim.en in tki,s ~stat.e t,o bec,o,me hydr~ated, w,e Mrou,l~d be ab.le .to fix t'h,e ind,ivi,dual bhno,[eeular .I~.eaf~e,t.s .of 1,i~p:i,d and r,eveal them :i.n ~s,e,et~i.ons ~oy e~e.etr.o,n m,iero,s~eo~py. I~t wa,s. .dear ,t,ha.t i f we eoultd ,do t,hti:s, ~and we f.ound f, or .each blimo,l,eeu~ar leaf le t a s!ir~g,~e ,d.eils,e line~ we wou ld have to choose the a l t e rna t ive i n t e rp r e t a t i on i l lus t ra ted in Fig. 18 b. Fig. 20 s~ow,s a Ls,p,eeiLme~n which w~als hydrat ,ed ,during fix,~ti,on. Ea,ch ~,i~ay,er of 1,i'pi~d ap'pe,ar.s '.a~s ~a ,pair ,o~f ,de.rts,e ]ii,ne.s .m,ak.ing u=p ,a uni1 ~ab,o,uf 60 A ~th,iek, apla:earhLg v e r y m.ueh ]ti,ke a u,ni,t meanbr,ane, .alih.o,ugh th,inner. This a l lowed us, then, 'to .eo,ne$u,d~e tha,t l~ip~i~d !mo,leeules, .in ,in.t~eraet{ng ~w.i'i~h ,our f ixing agents, develop densi t ies at the i r po la r ends. F r o m this we were able to eli!mina,le mo,del "b" in F,ig. 18 ,and .etm.o.se the .o,ne Jn "a" a,s .the ~only o.ne w,h~i& fit,t,ed all ,of ,the fa,et~s. I t wars ,thi,s analys,i.s ,t'hat was p r i m a r i l y re,sp,on- .s.i,b~e .fo,r 'the 'unacmb,ig~o,u,s ,cho,i:e.e ,o.f ,the k,ind .o.f Im.o~eeular ,d,iagrmn for the rep,ea~irtg p,er,i,o,d in ~erve mye l in tha t i:s ,i,~d~ieat,ed i~n Fig. 8. S,u~b,sequ,ent artaly,si,s has .eonfir~med ~tri,s in'ter,pr,ei.at, i.on wi th ,the .part ial ~s,o].u'ti, on of ~he

Page 22: Origin of the unit membrane concept

o r r C3

O ~2

Fig

. 20

. S

peci

men

of

egg

ee

ph

alin

fix

ed w

ith

KM

nO4,

em

bed

ded

in

A

rald

ite

and.

s,

ecti

o.ne

d.

Man

y

ind

ivid

ual

b

ilay

ers

are

sep

arat

ed

out

and

app

ear

as

pair

s of

de

nse

stra

ta.

Mag

. X

280,

000.

Page 23: Origin of the unit membrane concept

240 J .D. Roberts.on

X-r 'ay d!iffractii.on pro,bl.em in ;morse .r,eeent year,s [26, 271. H,ow,ever, d ie ,eSeetr,on miemseo,p,ic ,evid.en,ee ~in .th,e la.t,e 1950's was quite .ad,equ,ate t.o ,allow dafi,s e.o,nehtsi.o,n ,t.o .be t,,eached wd,th .a h,i~gh Id,egr,e:e o,f ce r t a imy . I,t .should b,e p,ointed out ,thai ,tlris ,eo,n,el, uls:i,on fro,m m,od,el s,tud~i, es wa,s v e r y ,el~egantly co,nfirmed b y a s i m g a r s t u d y ,by S .t ~. e ,c k ,e n ii u ,s [351 in eorr,e]atio,n wi th ,some X - r a y ,d!if- fract,i,on stu, d'i,e8 Iby La~ z z .a 't i and H u ,s .s o n [31] ,i.n 1962 even t~hough an earl.ier ,s'tndy ,by S t ,o ,c k ,e n i n ,s ,p~,bti,s,hed ~in 1959' [381 reached .e,o.ntr:a,d,iefo,ry con eltlts;ion, s.

Fig. 21. Fig. 22.

Fig. 21. Diagram of the electron microscopic appear~ance o.f myelin at its junction with the mesaxon to the left. Tio the right is ~uperimposed the molecular diagram reduced partly by X-ray diffraction and partly from the studies of model systems

by electron microscopy. Fig. 22. Molecular diagram of the general pattern of organization of the unit membrane. The bars represent non-polar earhon cha,ins ,of lipid m,oleeules with the eircle,s representing their polar heads. The zig-zag lines represent monolayers of non-lipid of two different kinds. It is not intended t,o exclude interpenetrati,on of the lipid earbon chains. This is not shown in the diagram for simplicity, Indeed,

some degree ,of interpenetration of the lipid carbon chains is very probable.

W;i,th all ,o,f thes,e facts dn baird, it was po~s,sib~e to take ~he moh~ecular d i a g r a m f.or the rad,ia~ r,e~peat'ing uni t in 'mye]'in ,t~at was p,o,s,tulaf.e,d 'by F ,i n e a n .i~n Fig. 8, .c,o.mbine dt wi.th the electron m~eroscope ,oS,s.ervatio.ns a.s lin, d ica ted dn F!i,g. 21, ex,tr,apol, af,e ,o,nt t,o the S.chwann cell su r face and ,say tEa.t f,h,e m,o.le,6ular ~pat, fern r.e~s~po~si,ble {or .the m~if m mnbralm .i~ma,ge was tha t .ind,i.eat,ed in tim d i ag ram. Thd,s led ,di,reetly to :t'he pos+uJ~ate t.ha,t t'he unde r ly ing mole,oular c,an~g.uratio,n ~o,[ the u.ndt me/mbrane ~stru.et'ure wa,s t.hat 's~o,wn ~in Fig. 22.

Tt~s dd, ag rmn ~s lin re,any w a y s s,i~n~i~ar to ~the ,o.ne ~p'rogo.se, d ~by D a n .i e 11 i and D a v s o n dn the 1930's b~uf lit sho,uld be no,ted t:h.at :it r:esu~ted fr,o,m a eom- p le te ly , independent l ine ,of work , d r a w i n g m a i n l y ,o,n evi,d,ene,e de r ived fronl e lec t ron m, ieros.eo,pe stud4~s. I n a ~s,ens~e, i,t ~ha,d ,i:ts to,otis ,in eo,mmon wd~th ~'he D,aniei~i-Davson 'm,od.el d n ,th,e w o r k ,of L a n g m u i r. Bu,t 'it was arr,ived

Page 24: Origin of the unit membrane concept

Origin of the Unit Membrane Concept 241

at b y a very +d~ifferetrf p a t t t w a y and thu+s ,sh, ott~d ,be cor~si~dered ~a~s an irrde- perrdemt aaro,d,el. Tlrks ,ks not YOo ~ay tha t ik ~d,o,~ ntc~t 9~rav~t~e ~onfiranat,~on o,f the general eorreetrres,s .of fire Da:niel~i an,odel. I t fd~oes m ~in, deed td~o this, ma, d in a~d&iti~n, if !p.rovides cer ta in rrew fact,s t h a t t ake t~s a liyofle ,f, urSh, e:r ,in ,uqn,d,er- starrffi,rrg the ~noleeul,ar erffa~i,zat~i.orn ,of anexn~rarres. Most ~p ,or t :an t ly , .i~t se,~s a 1,tenet on tire mrln~ex +of t,i!p~,d aTro[ecu, les ,in t~e ~orn~rarre ,to a s,~rrgle b~,layer. Another ~mtportam a,d~d:i~i,ocra~[ .feature .thaNe i t ia,~mdu~ees ~. the noSion +at .chenrieal ,a~syamnefry ,in the an,embr~rre. To he sure, ,drean.ical asy~-nmetry eou'~d be ~km'pLied froan ~t~e ea r ly deetro-p~hy.s,iol.o~eM ,stud,~es, even 4t1~e dayoi,ng l~ack t.o B e r n ~. t e i n. However , we rrow lrave ,d3efl.ni4e ,stru.etrrral ev3d, ence of ek~rrrieal a,syxnm,etry. T.'kis 'is esyoa~blkshed s imp ly f rom She Saet t.hat the r,a,&i,al repeat ' i~g un+it ~deteet.e,d b y X-ray &i.f.fr~a,eti,o;n arrarst +i~ehrd~ ~I~ro uaaiyo aIrel~brarres i~s.tea~d of nrre. T~ris +rrea~s ,~hmat the ~o~s,~die ~srr~f, aces..nard the ~i~rs.i,d,e surfaces of :~he m,e~brane ,must be ,sl~.nifi, eaxrtly l~f~ererryo li,n ,chemi,eal t,era~s. Thks, differ,ea'ree is anal~if,esked +in ihe el, eefroaa arr~i,erogral3tr.s ~of +eetai,ons of ~lyel.ixt 13y ~he +d~iffierent a~ppear:arree ,of ~he xn, aj.o.r ,den~s,e ,line a~d yoIre i~tira- peri, od ~iaae. Thi~ differen.ee c lear ly re+.u,l.t,s f rom a ,dfiff!ererree Sn (0he . r eac t i~ ty of time eomp,o~err~s ~of yolxe ~ia~side ~an, d ,one,side ~s:urfa~ees xrf She anearrbrane '~i,tth fixilrg ag~en.~s. The ~th,er ~m~p,ortam fea,ture th~at wa,s ,a~cLd, ed i,s yoIre ]~rrrit,at~on of 'the t'tri&~tes,s, o,f ,t,he .non-l~i~p$d aa~o+rrotayer in t~e f~ua~d,a.menf~at uni t . I f t ~ Sehwann cell an~enrbra'Ire ~,s ~o bte ~taken +as ,a genera l kype ,of alr~aabr, ane, lh,en the tl~iekness ,of ,the ,~roxt-li,p.id an,on, oLayers canrrot .ex,eeecl 20-30 A, ,riot a n y t,kicker lapers ~t~han tlrks si.a~pty canon,of 'be ~p~adce,d i~tyoo ~tahe imye~in s~eat~a al:o~g w,~6h the li~pid+s Shat a re kn,own fo b,e: .present. This ~thi&nes,s, [i,n~'.'t ,d~oes, h~ow- ever, ,su+gffest 'Nat ,o,rdy :once an oaa,o,layer ,o,f n.on-li.p~i~d .~s presment a t ea,ch surface of tire ,fundam.enyoal nrrit. The exac t ,st,a:te ,of • n~on-[~pid c,o~p,orrenyos Sn terms ,of ,pr~m,ary, secondary .o.r tert:iary ,struet.ure ha~s n, ot yet. been w~o~k,ed orrt. Frrorn ~ e ,fa~t qkra~t :the: ,op:tic az~ks ,of it;he angelica she atL lies in the r.a.d~ial &ireet:ion, w.e ,ea.rr .say h.ow.e~er, ~hat ,She n.on-lip~i,d any.e~i~n ,eoanl3,onen.t,s td~ not have ,a 'preferred or,ienyoafi,on. T,ki,s Js srot t,o ~ay, ~o~ev, er, ~ghat Ithey ,cannot have o.rd,er. F,o.r exanap:l,e, hez~a,ffonat , symmetry ~s , e o ~ p , a f ~ e w~:ch ,an ~ol~t,ic axis ~n the ra+d,i,al +d.iree/~i,o,n. The ra,d.~ally p,ositive i,ntrirrsic ~birefrJrrg.enee ho,wever, str,o,ngly su,ppoet,s ,the ,[a,rrrdlar ,arrange~errt .of ithe ,~'pd, d +a~rd ~n, deecl, the X-ray ~di,ffraet,i,o,n e~iderree 4,n ~ . prasent ,state tpro,~ides quite ,go,od a d,dAyoio~ral ev, id~en,ee.

There ,are severat ,~o.od reas,on.s ,for b,eh,e,~i~r~g yohak pa r t ,of .t~e ehe~ica l a~sy,rrrmetry o.f '~e ~unit membrarre iks attri,but,~rb}e 'to a re~at, ively h igh ,content of anu.eo,po,lys+aechari,de or anu.eopro+iein ,an, d p.erhap~s .glpeoiipi,d,s i~ the .tarter sur face fff t~he ,m.ean,brane border ing ,on 'ex'tr.a.eellular ana/e.rial. Whi le there is trot ye t icLefinifive ,proo.f ' that this .is ~s,o, .there are ,several~ ~s,u~gesSive ,lines of ev~derree. In ~he first p,~a,ee, perm.ar~ganate i.s a ]~et~t,er genera l f ixat ive for p,olys,aeeha~i,des :tJhan O,sO4. It ~ks ,a.l.s+o a ~ett,er fi~ca.tive for +t~bze ~o,uter ha i f .of the urrit an,emGr.a~ne, It w.~s *his fea'~ure +flha.t fizs~ suffgest.ed rthe presence of po.ly+aeeharide eo+mp.onei~s 4n .~he .oa~t,er hal~f e.f ,flhe axnit an,ean~.rarre. O,ttter fea.t,ures tl~at ,s,trg~est t~hks, however , ~d,o. exist . T,here Its very ~oo,d ~isto.elremical e-~kd.enee ~h.at the ,g.ap sttbStranee present betw.een q3~a~irs ~f un i t memhrarr.es, in so,me :t'kss,u.es a.t lea..s~, ~has kksyooekenri.eal ,s.t~rLni.rrg ,proper~i.es ,i.udieagin,g +the

Protoplasma, LXIII/1--3 16

Page 25: Origin of the unit membrane concept

242 J.D. Roberts on

~pI~ese,n,ce of mu:eo,polys,aec~arides. I~1 a.dditi.o~n, tire .tw,o ,out'side anenrbrane sur- fa*c~s ~Lnit,d :i~n an~elin ~o ,malce t im ~intraperi,od ~i.ne ~ a y ~e read i ly ~soI~t apa r t b y s.oaking anye}ixt/i,n ~d~is,t~]],ed ~wat.er. T h e y anay he hro,u,girt back t.o- ~etirer a,ga'~n b y ~mmersing ~flae ~yelr in in a d i lu te salt ,s,olutioa. By co~ntrast, rite is:urfaees aza~ited ,at fire aria}or ,d,errs'e ,1,ine d,o no,t ,eoan,e ,a~p.art ,~nder iiris ~rea,tm,esrt. This l~ehaviour i,s am4 ~urrli~/,e tha t o,f a ~poly,saeeirari,cfe ,gel [39]. Ano.~irer ki.~d .o,f evidence dep,em:ls ~o~n iramun~o~o,~i.e,al ,studies ~hi, ch have su,g.~es,~ed 4ira't .s,onle .of, ~t~te dmmuno,lo,gieal ipr,ol3~t,i.es ,oFf ~eell ~s,ur faces ,ex,pos,ed t,o ~h,e ,tort.side a re ~depemdeat .oa~ 'a rpolys,aeeharide ,e~mp~o.~ent .a~rd glye~li9,ids. The Jb~].~o~cl ,grLo,u,p sttb~stanees, for !i,n.s.~avtee, ,are well ]cno~wn t~o .eon.tai~ .a ,p,oly- s,a,eeharid,e el.eanerrt. Th, ese ,are a~o,st ~roba.bly ,located :i.n ~the ,o,u~sid,e surface ~f ~he ~,nit ,m, er~brane o.f re,el ~,loo,d ~ee~l,s. M,o,s~ .a~l ~o,f :tirese v.ari, ous t~i,fls o.f evidence s,ee~ 't,o. ~b,e m~ost cornpai'ible w,ith the .assu~pii.on ~hat She ex te rna l s,urfa,ee ,o,f .fire ~trrit ,m,embra~re .eo~tM~rs ~a p,olys:ae&aride ,de~nen.t ,in ,the .f,or~n, p,erira:ps, o,f a aTm,e,o,pro,$ein a n d Iperh:ap.s a g,lye,o,}iodd ,element. This m a y very well aeeo~rrt for iire ,s,tr~e~ural d~e~i.eM asymane.try ,evs ~in She ~nye]i,n skeatir as well ,as i,n ,other m, erabranes iby s cha~aetet%i@,s.

I,t was, ,o~f eo.ars,e, neees~sary ~to es~a~b~i,sh tha't ,tire an:it ntea~br,a~e ,pati.erns observed ,in ele.etron ~n~i,er'o~g.raphs a t ~the sur face ~,f 'Lhe S,eItwann .eell.s 6n rel~t~ion to ,myelin was rro:t a ,p.eeuliar'Ry ,o'f tire Sehvca~im cell. We sat~,st]e,d ourselves tha t this was the ease in the late 1950's by conduct ing extensive ,survey,s ,of a n.Ulr~irer ,o,f ~c~ifferent 4y~.es ,o.f ,its,sues ,fr,o~n ,many ,diffe.ren.t ,organs and f.r,oan sunny ,&iger,ent a~ri~rrra}s., ewen ,of ,different ,piryl,a [40]. Tire patLern wa.s demons t r a t ed h.o,tir , ~ t h KMnO4 a~d OsO~ fix,at.fan, al.tirough ~he la~tt,er me ,hod requir,ed ~s,ev.er,al years .o,f .e~Nu~io,n ~o,f .tire ~.eehniq.ue before ,tire uni4 me~,bra'ne p a t t e r n ,beg,an fo a,pg.e,ar ~eonsishently. The pa'tte.rn ~is IrOW fa i r ly regu,l.arly seen a f te r g}u6aral~d,ehyde f ixat ion fo}lo,wed Iby OsO~ and it has b,~en ,de,moaMra~d ,in ,all anel~.r~an,o~u.s eelI ,orgaIrel,~es ian, d strewn r he reg~u- l:arly pr,esem no.t ,only in ani,m:a,fs, hwt i.n l ~ a n t ceils. I.t thus avpears i,o b,e a .u.rriv.er,sa.1 ,bi,ol, ogieal ,eo:n.sta.nt. I t isiron~fd Ire un_,&ers,to.od, Irowever, ~hat thds is ~o'.t ~n,eaat ~o i ,mply firm 4ire struetnr,e is a rli,g,id o~ae which ~ever varies. Obv.i.o,usly .mem~.rane,s h a v e .spe,eificity. I t is kno,wn tlh, a,t :the eirean,i, eaI co~n- po,si,tio,n ,o,f d i f ferent anembranes. ~s qu,i.t,e differ,eat. The ,parbi,eu,lar mole.eular s,p.eeies tIra~t ~ .ake trp ,any given anen~br.ane m a y 'vary co~nslkterat~ly. We .do n,ot ye t k n o w whe.tirer t~er.e is ,any a.rrang,emen~ .of par:t ieular ,mol,eeular species ~tha.t is cmn, m,on ,to. a l l an.e~b.ranes. Tirere ~n.ay he s,oan,e co,maTron s t ruc tura l ~protein ,or .struetural }i,po-protein tirat is .of ,general o,ceurrerme a,t least dn a :p,arti.eular s~peeie,s. Ho,w,ewer, i,t ,d,o.es ,alp~?ear ,o,rt tire basis .of the evi, d,enee t h a t Ir~s b~een .o,utl,in.ed Itira.t tire genera l ,p,attern ,o{ ,or..ga~rization o.f ee]:l m.eanhra.n,es en~b,odie, d :in tire .u,nit ,mem.br'ane .concept is ,eOLr~s.tant .and general. I t is p,assihle ' that lo,eal variatio.n,s ,in ,tire pa~tern ,o.f o.rganizat.ion m a y ,occur, such ,a,s ~phase dranges ,in the ]i:pid hil,ay,er v~iLh r,earran,g.e~ments of ,the l~ipid ~mo.leeu~es oeeurr ing '~n cer ta in r.egi,o~s, r,earrartgements o,f the k ind p,ostal'at, ed ~by S j 5 ,s t r ,a ~n ,d [41] ,on tire basis ,o~f the wo.rk ,o~f L u z z a t i and H u,s s ,o n [37] aI~d ,of S t o.e e k ,e n i u ,s [36] and this ,~s a :topic .on which m,u.eh current .activity is lee~4,ered. H.otwev.er, a't the pr,e,s,ent t,~me, there is no p,c~sit*ive evidence first s,ueh ~piras,e tra~rs,forrcrations ,ever .o.eeur in lilpo-pro.tein

Page 26: Origin of the unit membrane concept

Origin of the Unit Membrane Co,ncept 243

syste~rrrs .eitqher in oitro or in oioo. I t is quite cesta,in t~rat ~uch chaag,es h~ave no~ been d,e~nroa~strated !in ~rerve any,e~in. C,o,rr~el.a~ed ~riophy~i, cal s,t~d~,es b y e.l~ectron ~,cro~:eopy, p,otariz,afion .optics arr, d X-ray ,diffra.et,i,on ,hawe ,a,ls,o been carri~ed ,out .in o,ur ,labor, at,pry on intlaet .re~ina~ ~o~d Qufer ,se,gan,eats ~,here s,tacks of ~rrri~ an,embraxres o~e f , o ~ d ~ra,ldng ~p i]ae regular ,laanellae ,of the u receptors. O,ur .evi~demce fa,~s t,o snl3p,ort a gl,~bu.l~ar phase t ransfor- mation in ~ e nx.eanLbrarre ,1.ip4,d.s .~n She ,inSaet .rod l~rmdIae. How,ever, s.ome q,tresfi.on h~s been rais,ad ~y ~he wor~ ~f ,o/~her~ [42] a~s ~ ~ e ~ e r or n,~ ~l,abnlar ip~ase t.rarrsf, orma~ions ~aay occur ~n the RO S m , e a ~ a ~ e l~ipi,d~. Evidence a,~,trib~rt.a~bl.e to such changes ,h~s b ee~ {,~und ~n X-ray an,d EM st~d,~es of exterrs~ively ~legr,~d,ed ROS naem~ran~,. W~i, le .oar own s~trd.ies do a~ot sutpport t~'he prreSemee of such tr.a~forana,H~rrs ia~ !intact ROS anem- branes, we have seen evi,d.e~ree af l~i,d rearrangements o e c u r r ~ g ia ret ,~al rods afSer prolon,ged .expos.ure ~f,o the X-ray b e a ~ ,th,a.t ,could ~e ,r,daf.ed such phase transformations. We at t r ibute these changes to degradat ion and all our evidence at present is against the occurrence of such phase transitions a,s a ws or ~e~eral ~fea~fnre o,f a n y ,unit an,em~bran,es. I t wou~d be b,eyo~d ~ e ,scape ,of tke ~presen~ p a p e r ~ pro~eeed s ,~nto .~his topic and I shah not ,un, der take ,~o ,do .,so becatrs,e I ,have recerrtly ,considered it at some le~gt,h 5.n two o.t'her ar~e],es [d~3, 4,hi. Saff~ee ,i~ to say ,~hat ~at ,t,'he 9resen.t :t@ne fke ,general arrar~gement of ~,e .,l~pd,d ,an, d non-~ip:id components ~d~p.~eted s F,ig. 21 ~s~i~l.1 appe,ar, s to expresls ~dtre nros.t ~general ,pa~terrt ,of ,m.ol,eeu~ar ,orffa~r~i- zat~on ~of a:ll [4vin~g ~mexrtbra, nes.

Relerenees

[1] O v e r t on, E., 1845: t3ber die o.smo~isehen Eigenschaftea der leben,den Pflan- zen- und Tierzelle~. Yierteljahresschr. Naturforsch. Ges. Ziirieh 40, 159--201.

[2] G i e s e , A. C., 19,62: Cell Physiology. 2rid ed. Philadelphia: Saun~ders and Co. [3] L a n g m u i r, I., 1917: The eons.titution and fun, d,amental propertkes, of spuds

and liquids. II. Liquids. J. Amer. Chem. S.oc. 371, 1Sd,8--1905,. [~] G o r t e r, E., and R. G r e n d el, 1925: On bimolecular layers of lip oid on the

chromocytes of ,the blood. J. Exper. Med. 41, &39 443.. [5] H a r k i n s , W. D., E. C. H. D a v i e s , and F. L. C l a r k , t917: The orientation

of molecules in the surfaces of liquids, the energy relations at snrfaces, solu- bility, absorbtion, emulsification, molecular association, and the effect of acids and bases on interfac~al tension (surface energy VI). Amer. Chem. Soc. ~9, 541--596.

[6] ~ u d d, S., and E. B. H. M u d d , 1931: The dreformabili~ty and the wetting prt}perties of leukocytes and erythrocytes. J. Gen. Physiol. 14, 773--752.

[7] D a n i e l l i , J. F., and H. A. D a v s a n , 1935: A contribution to the theory of permeability of thin films. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. ~, 495--500.

I8] C o l e , K. S., 1932: Surface forces of the arbacia egg. J. Cell. Compl Physiol. I, 1--9.

[9] H a r v e y , E. N., and H. S h i p i r o , 1934: The interfacial tension between oil and protoplasm within living cells. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 5, 255--268.

[10] D a n i e l l i , J. F., and E. N. H a r v e y , 1935: The tension at the surface of mackeral egg oil with remarks on the nature .of the cell surface. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 5, 483--d,94.

16"

Page 27: Origin of the unit membrane concept

244 ~. D. Robertson

[11] W a u g h , D. E., and F. O. S c h m i t t , 1940: Investigations of the ,thickness and ul trastructure of cellular membranes by the analyt ical leptoscope. Cold Spring. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 8, 233--24,1.

[12] B l o d g e t t , K. B., 1935: Films bui l t up by depositing successive monomole- cular 1,ayers on a s,ol~d surface. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 57, 1007--1022.

[13] S c h m i t t, F. O., R. S. Be a r, and E. P o n d er , 1936: Optical properties of the red cell membrane, J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 9, 89--92.

[!4] M i t e h e s o n , J. M., 1952: Cell membranes and cell d~wisions. Soc. Exper. Biol. Symp. 6, 10'5--127.

[15] S c h m i d t, W. J., 1937: Z. Wiss. Mkr. 54, 159. [16] S c h m i t t , F, O., R.S. B e a r ~ and G.L. CI a r k , 1955: X-ray diffraction studies

on nerve, Radiol. 25, 131. [17] S c h m i t t , F. O., 1936: Nerve ul trastructure as revealed by X-ray diffraction

and polarized light studies. Cold. Spring. ~arb . Syrup. quant. Biol. 4, 7--12. [18] S c h m i t t , F. O., R. S. B e a r , and K. Y. P a l m e r , 1941: X-ray diffraction

studies on the s,tructure of the nerve myel,in sheath. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 18, 39. [19] C h i n n, P., and F. O. S c h m i,t t, 1937: On the birefringence of nerve sheaths

as studied in cross sections. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 289--296. [20] A u t i l i o , L. H., W. Y. N o r t o n, and R. D. T e r r y, 1964: The preparat ion

and some properties of purified myelin from the central nervous system. J. Neurochem. 11, 17--27.

[21] O'B r ~e n, J. S., and E. L. S a m p s o n, 19'65: Li.p~,d c,o,mp,o,s~i~t~ion of the normal human brain: gray matter, white mat ter and myelin. J. Lip'id ties. 6, 539~544.

[22] F o l c h , J., and F. N. L e B a r o n , 19'56: The isol,ation from brain tissue of a t rypsin resistant protein fraction cont~aining comb!ned inositol and its rel.a,tion to nuerokerat.in. J. Neurochem. I, 101--10,8.

123] M a t s u i n o t o , M., R. Ma t su ,m ,o~ to , an~d J. F o l c h , 1964: The chtr~om,ato- graphic fract~i.onati.on of brain white matter proteolipids. J. Neurochem. 11, 829--838.

[24] T e n n c n b a u m , D., and J. F o l c h , 19'66: The prepara~don and characteri- zation of water-s,oluble proteol,ipid protein from bovine bra in white matter. Biochem. Biophys. A. 115, 141--14.7.

[25] F o l c h, J., 1964: Some considerafi.ons on the structure of proteol~pids. Federa- tion Proc. 27, 630--633.

[26] F i n e a n , J. B., and R. E. B u r g e , 1963: The de:termination of the Fourier transformation of the myelin layer from a s tudy of swelling phenomena. J. Mol. Biol. 7, 672--682.

I271 M o o d y , M., 1963: X-ray diffraction pat tern of nerve myelin: A method for determdning the phases. Science 142, 1173--1174.

[28] F i n e a n , J. B., 1955: Recent ideas on the structure of myelin. Biochem. Prob. L{pids, Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Univ. Ghent, 129--131, London: Butterworths, 27--20, July 1955.

[291 G a s s e r, H. S., 1952: Discussion in "The hypotheses of s,altatory conduction." Cold Spring. H.arb. Syrup. quant. Biol. 17, 32--26.

[30} G a s s e r , H. S., 1955: Properties of dorsal root in medullated fibers in the two sides of the ganglion. J. Gen. Physiol.. 78, 709~728.

[311 R o b e r t s o n, J. David, 1957: New observations on the ul lrastrueture of the membranes of frog peripheral nerve fibers. JBBC. ~, 10,43--1048.

[3,21 G e r e n, B. B., 1954: The formafi.on from the Schw,ann ceil surface of myelin in the peripheral nerves of chick embryos. Exper. Cell Res. 7, ~73--49'6.

[33] L u f t, J. H., 195,6: Perm~anganate - - a new fix~ative f.or electron microscopy. JBBC. 2, 799--801.

Page 28: Origin of the unit membrane concept

Origin of the Unit Membrane Concept 245

[34] F i n e a n, J. B., 1954: The effects of osmium tetroxide fixation on the structure myelin in sciatic nerve. Exper. Cell Res. 6, 293--29'3.

[35] F e r n a n d e z - M o r a n , H., and J. B. F i n e a n , 195,7: Electron microscope and low angle X-ray diffraction studies of 4he nerve myelin sheath. JBBC. 3, 725--748.

[36] S t o e c k e n i u s, W., 1962: Some electron microscopical obs,ervat-ons on liquid- crystalline phases in lipid-water systems. JCB. 12, 22--22%

[37] L u z z a t i, V., and R. H u s s o n, 1962: The structure of the liquid-crystalline phases of lipid water systems. JCB. 12, 207--220.

[3.8] S t o e c k e n i u s, W., 1959: An electron microscope study of myelin figures. JBBC. 5, 49t--500.

[39] R o b e r t,s o n, J. David, 1958: Structural alterations in nerve fibers produced by hypot.onic and hypertonie so.lutions. JBBC. 4, 349~364.

[40,] R o b e r t s o n, J. David, 1959: The ul, trastrueture of cell membranes ,and their derivatives. Bioehem. Soc. Syrup. 16, 3--43.

[•l] S j i ~ s t r a n d , F. S., 1963: A new s~rucmral element o.f the membranes in miteehondria and of some eyt,oplasmic membranes:. J. Ultrastruet. Res. 9, 340--3'6l.

[42] B l a i s i e , F. K., M. M. D e w e y , A. E. B I a u t o ek, and C. R. W o r t h i n g - t on, 1%5: Electron mierosoepe and low angle X-ray diff:raction studies on outer segment membranes. J. Mol. Biol. 14, 143--152.

[~3] R o b e r t s o n, J. David, 1966: Granulo-fibrillar and gl.obular sub s,trueture in unit memb.ranes. Ann. N.Y. Aead. Sci. IJ7, 42I~440.

[44] R o b e r t s o n , J. David: Design principles of the unit membrane. Ciba Foundation Symposium (in press).

[45] R o b e r t s o n, J. David, 1955: The ultrastructure of adult vertebrate peri- pheral myel,inated fibers in relation to myclinogenesis. JBBC. I, 271--278.