R1 Swap Benchmark

Technology QOS & CEM

Analysis Summary

• Benchmark analysis conducted on R1 commercial region N1, N2, N3, C1 ,C4 & C5-R1 based on the major service KPIs.• R2 region swap is in progress, hence cannot be analyzed under current circumstances.• Inferences over R1 swap analysis are quite satisfactory in almost all service KPIs.

Tech Region Total Swap Planned Sites Sites Swapped So Far

North 1454 1428

Central-1 584 584

Total 2038 2012

• Swap for R1 has almost been completed with the current status as below.

Major City & Surroundings Commercial Region Percentage Completion1-Sahiwal Central-5 [R1]

Already Huawei(8 Zones)2-Okara, 3-Shahdara, 4-Lahore, 5-Lahore, 6-Lahore Central-1

13-Rawalpindi, 14-Islamabad North-17-Sheikhupura, 8-Gujranwala, 9-Wazirabad, 10-Gujrat Central-4

100%(7 Zones)

11-Gojar Khan North-115-Taxila North-3

19-Skardu North-212-KotliRural North-3 98.00%

16-Bajaur Agency North-2 99.60%17-Khyber Agency North-2 96.50%

18-Peshawar North-2 98.00%

Network Availability [R1]- Central 1

NAR has improved for all the regions as compared to the previous values

Region Jan-2013 Jan-2014 %age

C1 98.9% 99.1% 0.2%

C4 98.4% 99.3% 0.9%

C5 [R1] 97.5% [Jul] 99.0% 1.5%

1/1/

2013

2/1/

2013

3/1/

2013

4/1/

2013

5/1/

2013

6/1/

2013

7/1/

2013

8/1/

2013

9/1/

2013

10/1

/201

311

/1/2

013

12/1

/201

31/

1/20

141/

1/20

132/

1/20

133/

1/20

134/

1/20

135/

1/20

136/

1/20

137/

1/20

138/

1/20

139/

1/20

1310

/1/2

013

11/1

/201

312

/1/2

013

1/1/

2014

7/1/

2013

8/1/

2013

9/1/

2013

10/1

/201

311

/1/2

013

12/1

/201

31/

1/20

14

C1 C4 C5 (R1)

90%

92%

94%

96%

98%

100%

102%

98.9% 99.1%98.4%

99.3%

97.5%

99.0%

Network Availability Central 1 [R1]

CALL SETUP SR [R1]- Central 1

C4 CSSR IMRPOVED with the SWAP C1 & C5 [R1] remained Stable although Blocking Increased in the Regions due to

increase in Traffic

Region Jan-2013 Jan-2014 %age

C1 96.6% 96.2% -0.4%

C4 92.8% 95.0% 2.2%

C5 [R1] 94.9% 94.4% -0.5%

Jan-

13Fe

b-13

Mar

-13

Apr-

13M

ay-1

3Ju

n-13

Jul-1

3Au

g-13

Sep-

13O

ct-1

3N

ov-1

3D

ec-1

3Ja

n-14

Jan-

13Fe

b-13

Mar

-13

Apr-

13M

ay-1

3Ju

n-13

Jul-1

3Au

g-13

Sep-

13O

ct-1

3N

ov-1

3D

ec-1

3Ja

n-14

Mar

-13

Apr-

13M

ay-1

3Ju

n-13

Jul-1

3Au

g-13

Sep-

13O

ct-1

3N

ov-1

3D

ec-1

3Ja

n-14

C1 C4 C5[R1]

909192939495969798

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

96.696.2

92.8

95.0

94.9

94.4

Regional CSSR Central 1 Trend MonthlyMax of CSSR Max of CS Blck

Call

Setu

p Su

cces

s Rat

e

CS T

CH B

lock

ing

Rate

CALL SETUP NORTH [R1]- Central 1

CSSR IMPROVED for all the regions after the SWAP although there was a Traffic rise

Region Jan-2013 Jan-2014 %age

N1 94.2% 96.8% 2.6%

N2 86.7% 90.3% 3.6%

N3 92.3% 96.0% 3.7%

Jan-

13Fe

b-13

Mar

-13

Apr-

13M

ay-1

3Ju

n-13

Jul-1

3Au

g-13

Sep-

13O

ct-1

3N

ov-1

3D

ec-1

3Ja

n-14

Jan-

13Fe

b-13

Mar

-13

Apr-

13M

ay-1

3Ju

n-13

Jul-1

3Au

g-13

Sep-

13O

ct-1

3N

ov-1

3D

ec-1

3Ja

n-14

Jun-

13Ju

l-13

Aug-

13Se

p-13

Oct

-13

Nov

-13

Dec

-13

Jan-

14

N1 N2 N3

75

80

85

90

95

100

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

94.296.8

86.7 90.392.3

96.0

Regional CSSR NORTH Trend MonthlyMax of CSSR Max of CS Blck

Call

Setu

p Su

cces

s Rat

e

CS T

CH B

lock

ing

Rate

DROP CALL RATE [R1]- Central 1

Drop Call Rate reported IMPROVED for C4 & C5[R1] Region as depicted by the Graph Drop Call Rate reported STABLE for C1 Region C4 Reports the HIGHEST improvement because it is the only region that was SWAPPED

[C1 & C5[R1]] were already HUAWEI & therefore no SWAP]

Region Jan-2013 Jan-2014 %age

C1 0.9% 0.91% 0%

C4 1.6% 1.1% 0.5%

C5 [R1] 1.5% [Mar] 1.4% 0.1%

Jan-

13Fe

b-13

Mar

-13

Apr-

13M

ay-1

3Ju

n-13

Jul-1

3Au

g-13

Sep-

13O

ct-1

3N

ov-1

3D

ec-1

3Ja

n-14

Jan-

13Fe

b-13

Mar

-13

Apr-

13M

ay-1

3Ju

n-13

Jul-1

3Au

g-13

Sep-

13O

ct-1

3N

ov-1

3D

ec-1

3Ja

n-14

Mar

-13

Apr-

13M

ay-1

3Ju

n-13

Jul-1

3Au

g-13

Sep-

13O

ct-1

3N

ov-1

3D

ec-1

3Ja

n-14

C1 C4 C5[R1]

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

0.9 0.9

1.6

1.1

1.51.4

Regional DCR Central 1 Trend Monthly Max of DCR Max of Traffic

Dro

p Ca

ll Ra

te

Traffi

c Ca

rrie

d [E

rlang

]

DROP CALL RATE [R1]- NORTH

Drop Call Rate slightly increased for N1 & N2 Regions. For N1 DCR increased after June 2013 [cells of N3 separated from N1 Changed the Set for calculation of DCR Low Traffic carried by N3 cells Low DCR Overall Regional DCR low].

DCR for N2 remained stable although there was substantial Traffic rise.

Region Jan-2013 Jan-2014 %age

N1 1.1% 1.1% 0.0

N2 1.3% 1.3% 0.0

N3 1.0% 1.0% 0.0%

Jan-

13Fe

b-13

Mar

-13

Apr-

13M

ay-1

3Ju

n-13

Jul-1

3Au

g-13

Sep-

13O

ct-1

3N

ov-1

3D

ec-1

3Ja

n-14

Jan-

13Fe

b-13

Mar

-13

Apr-

13M

ay-1

3Ju

n-13

Jul-1

3Au

g-13

Sep-

13O

ct-1

3N

ov-1

3D

ec-1

3Ja

n-14

Jun-

13Ju

l-13

Aug-

13Se

p-13

Oct

-13

Nov

-13

Dec

-13

Jan-

14

N1 N2 N3

00.20.40.60.8

11.21.41.6

0100002000030000400005000060000700008000090000

1.1 1.11.3

1.3

1.0 1.0

Regional DCR North Trend Monthly Max of DCR Max of Traffic

Dro

p Ca

ll Ra

te

Traffi

c Ca

rrie

d [E

rlang

]

DL TBF SR [R1]- Central 1

Downlink TBF SR IMPROVED for C4 despite a substantial rise in Payload Downlink TBF SR remained STABLE for C1 and C5[R1] for a rise in Payload for both the

Regions

Region Jan-2013 Jan-2014 %age

C1 98.9% 98.3% -0.6%

C4 95.4% 97.5% 2.1%

C5 [R1] 98.6% 98.5% -0.1%

Mar

-13

Apr-

13M

ay-1

3Ju

n-13

Jul-1

3Au

g-13

Sep-

13O

ct-1

3N

ov-1

3D

ec-1

3Ja

n-14

Mar

-13

Apr-

13M

ay-1

3Ju

n-13

Jul-1

3Au

g-13

Sep-

13O

ct-1

3N

ov-1

3D

ec-1

3Ja

n-14

Mar

-13

Apr-

13M

ay-1

3Ju

n-13

Jul-1

3Au

g-13

Sep-

13O

ct-1

3N

ov-1

3D

ec-1

3Ja

n-14

C1 C4 C5 [R1]

88

90

92

94

96

98

100

0

50000000

100000000

150000000

200000000

25000000098.9 98.3

95.4

97.598.6 98.5

Regional DL TBF SR Central 1 Trend MonthlyMax of DL TBF SR Max of Payload

TBF

Succ

ess

Rate

Payl

oad

[Kilo

byte

s]

DL TBF SR [R1]- NORTH

DL TBF SR IMPROVED for N1 and N3 despite a substantial increase in the Payload carried per day

DL TBF SR remained STABLE for N2 following an increase in the Payload carried per day

Region Jan-2013 Jan-2014 %age

N1 97.5% 98.6% 1.1%

N2 97% 96.6% -0.4%

N3 94.5% 97.6% 3.1%

Mar

-13

Apr-

13M

ay-1

3Ju

n-13

Jul-1

3Au

g-13

Sep-

13O

ct-1

3N

ov-1

3D

ec-1

3Ja

n-14

Mar

-13

Apr-

13M

ay-1

3Ju

n-13

Jul-1

3Au

g-13

Sep-

13O

ct-1

3N

ov-1

3D

ec-1

3Ja

n-14

Jun-

13Ju

l-13

Aug-

13Se

p-13

Oct

-13

Nov

-13

Dec

-13

Jan-

14

N1 N2 N3

919293949596979899

0

20000000

40000000

60000000

80000000

100000000

120000000

140000000

160000000

97.5

98.6

97.096.6

94.5

97.6

Regional DL TBF SR North Trend MonthlyMax of DL TBF SR Max of Payload

TBF

Succ

ess

Rate

Payl

oad

[Kilo

byte

s]

Mean Opinion Score [MOS]47 48 49 45 46 38 12 39 4 6 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 1 2 3 5 7 16 17

Zone-07 Zone-08 Zone-09

Zone-10 Zone-11 Zone-12 Zone-15 Zone-16

R1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Mean Opinion Score [Pre-Post] ComparisonMax of MOS Pre Swap Max of MOS Post Swap

Mea

n O

pini

on S

core

[MO

S]

47 48 49 45 46 38 12 39 4 6 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 1 2 3 5 7 16 17Zone-07 Zone-08 Zone-

09Zone-10 Zone-11 Zone-12 Zone-15 Zone-16

R1

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

160%

180%

%age Improvement in MOS

%ag

e im

prov

emen

t in

MO

S

Throughput [kbps]

47 48 49 45 46 38 12 39 4 6 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 1 2 3 5 7 16 17 19 20 21 18 24

Zone-07 Zone-08 Zone-09

Zone-10 Zone-11 Zone-12 Zone-15 Zone-16 Zone-18

R1

020406080

100120140

Throughput [kbps] [Pre-Post] ComparisonMax of Post-Swap Max of Pre-Swap

Thro

ughp

ut k

bps

47 48 49 45 46 38 12 39 4 6 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 1 2 3 5 7 16 17 19 20 21 18 24Zone-07 Zone-08 Zone-

09Zone-10 Zone-11 Zone-12 Zone-15 Zone-16 Zone-18

R1

0%

100%

200%

300%

400%

500%

600%

700%

800%

900%

1000%

%age Improvement in Throughput [kbps]

Coverage

All zones with post swap benchmark show

improvement