open access advocacy: joining the dots (session 4a)

8
Catherine Sharp [email protected] Open Access Advocacy at UCL

Upload: research-consulting-limited

Post on 16-Jul-2015

94 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Open access advocacy: joining the dots (session 4a)

Catherine Sharp

[email protected]

Open Access Advocacy at UCL

Page 2: Open access advocacy: joining the dots (session 4a)

The institution

• 4,800 staff & postdocs

• 4,500 research students

• 15K publications p.a.

• UCL Publications Policy: all outputs

must be deposited in UCL Discovery

• 6m downloads

• 20K full-text items in Discovery

• UCL Press

• UCL Publications Board

• Open Access Working Group

Page 3: Open access advocacy: joining the dots (session 4a)

The message WHAT…

• REF Policy

• UCL Publications Policy

• COAF, RCUK et al

WHO…

• Office of the Vice-Provost (Research) –

REF Team

• Open Access Team (Library)

• Academic Advisory Group

TO Schools, Faculties, Departments…

• School of Life & Medical Sciences

• Built Environment, Engineering Sciences

and Maths & Physical Sciences

• Arts & Humanities, Laws, Social &

Historical Sciences

Page 4: Open access advocacy: joining the dots (session 4a)

HOW…Open Access Communication Plan

Stakeholders

• Deans & Vice-Deans (Research)

• Research Committees / Groups / Boards

• Heads of Department / Institute / Centre

• Researchers

• DAs and research administrators

• UCL Communications & Marketing

• UCL Research Services

• Jisc & systems suppliers (Symplectic)

• Publishers

Information

• Requirements

• Processes

• Monitoring

Page 5: Open access advocacy: joining the dots (session 4a)

HOW…

Activities

• Meetings with HoDs

• E-mail reminders

• Web guidance

• Workshops

• Conferences

• Guide & 1-page summary

• DA Forum

• Research Support Forum

and so on…

Page 6: Open access advocacy: joining the dots (session 4a)

ChallengesTechnical

• Deposit at acceptance in a world of

post-publication harvesting

• Monitoring and reporting

• Merging records after harvesting

Cultural

• Communicating with all researchers

in a large organisation

• Managing compliance in departments

• Creating manual metadata records

• Depositing the right version

Page 7: Open access advocacy: joining the dots (session 4a)

Field required for REF reporting

Will appearin CASRAI spec?

Related RIOXX element

Requirement Options for populating field

Date of acceptance

dcterms:dateAccepted

Add reportable field

Manual (possible Scopus harvest)

Date of deposit Add reportable field

Automated

Embargo enddate

ali:license_ref Add reportable field

Manual (repository staff only), with automation in future; added at deposit

Version rioxxterms:version Add reportable field

Manual

Exceptions Add REF exceptions (technical, deposit, access)

Manual;repository team to select from pick-list

Key metadata for monitoring and reporting

Page 8: Open access advocacy: joining the dots (session 4a)

Open access projects

• RLUK publisher processes sub-group

- Including initial work on best practice with Edinburgh and Manchester

• Jisc Pathfinder project with Nottingham and Newcastle

• Jisc Monitor

• OpenAIRE2020

[email protected]