ontario campaign 2000 december 2020 update

1
* Ontario Campaign 2000 December 2020 Update Decreases in the rate of child poverty have slowed Child Poverty Rates in Ontario Source: Statistics Canada, T1 Family Files. After-tax low income status of tax filers and dependents based on Census Family Low Income Measure (CFLIM-AT), by family type and family type composition. 2014-2018. Table: 11-10-0018-01 (formerly CANSIM 111-0046). Percentage of Children in Low Income Ontario Child Poverty Rate, 2014-2018 (Under 18) 22.5% 21.1% 19.5% 18.7% 18.0% 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 0 5 10 15 20 25 18.2% National Rate 2018 507,760 children 544,710 children 586,150 children 619,170 children 523,990 children 2015 2016 2017 2018 0 5 10 15 20 Source for CFLIM data: Statistics Canada. T1 Family Files. After-tax low income status of tax filers and dependants based on Census Family Low Income Measure (CFLIM-AT), by family type and family type composition, 2018. Table: 11-10-0018-01 (formerly CANSIM 111-0046) Source for MBM data: Statistics Canada. Market Basket Measure Low income statistics by age, sex and economic family type. Table: 11-10-0135-01 (formerly CANSIM 206-0041) CF LIM 18.0% MBM 12.5% Ontario Child Poverty Rate Comparison: MBM vs CFLIM 507,760 children in low income 338,000 children in low income Source: Statistics Canada. T1 Family Files. Table F-20 After-tax low income status of census families (census family low income measures, CFLIM-AT) by family type and family composition, adjusted methodology, 2018. Depth of Family Poverty in Ontario After-Tax Median Income Poverty Gap Lone Parent with 1 Child Couple with 1 Child Lone Parent with 2 Children Couple with 2 Children 0 10k 20k 30k 40k LIM AT: $30,877 LIM AT: $37,816 LIM AT: $37,816 LIM AT: $43,666 $19,580 $27,090 $26,170 $33,840 $11,297 $10,276 $11,646 $9,826 Percentage of Children in Poverty Impact of Government Transfers (Under 18) Poverty Rate Without Transfers Poverty Rate With Transfers Canada Ontario 0 10 20 30 46.6% lower with transfers 45.0% lower with transfers 33.1% 33.7% 18.2% 18.0% Source: Statistics Canada, Center for income and socioeconomic well-being statistics, Annual Income Estimates for Census Families and Individuals (T1 Family File), Custom Tabulation, 2018. No matter how you measure it, children in poverty are falling through the cracks Lone Parents Experience Large Poverty Gaps; and Movement out of Poverty for Many Families is Slowing Without Government Benefits, Many More Children would live in Poverty Systemic inequities have deepened during the pandemic, and the Ontario Government has been Missing in Action on meaningful reform. Treading water on ending child poverty is unacceptable at any time; avoiding policy changes that would help to stem pandemic-related impacts on children and families living in poverty is inexcusable. Ontario Campaign 2000 provides the following recommendations: To read Ontario Campaign 2000's full set of recommendations as published in the April 2020 Report on Child Poverty please visit www.ontariocampaign2000.ca. National, provincial, and territorial report cards can be found at www.campaign2000.ca. The child poverty rate in Ontario has decreased annually since 2013, but recent reductions are marginal - less than a percentage a year since 2015. The under-6 child poverty rate is 19.5% (170,730 children), with a rate reduction of 0.7% from 2017-2018; only 5560 young children moved out of poverty in 2018. Children whose families face marginalization and who are impacted by the ongoing legacy of colonization face higher rates of poverty than the provincial average, ranging from 21% for Métis children, 31% for Inuit children, 32% for non-status FN children, 37% for Status FN children off reserve, and 48% for Status FN children on reserve. Whether rates are measured by MBM or CFLIM-AT, the trend is the same: The rate of reduction has slowed or stopped. Using the Market Basket Measure (MBM), instead of the Census Family Low Income Measure (After-Tax) (CFLIM- AT), to measure poverty doesn’t show the whole picture. In Ontario, 169,760 children live in the poverty gap between the MBM and the CFLIM-AT. If the government isn’t recognizing these children, their families may be excluded from poverty reduction solutions. 1 in 7 families in Ontario live in poverty. This number increases to 1 in 3 for lone parent families. Regardless of family type, social assistance rates in Ontario have been fairly flat since the mid-1990s, and do not bring income rates up to the CFLIM-AT. Lone parent families living in low income face larger wealth gaps than couple families with children living in low income. Government transfers like the Canada Child Benefit and the Ontario Child Benefit have a massive impact on driving down the child poverty rate. The Ontario Child Benefit is indexed to the rate of inflation, but has not been significantly increased in years. Barriers to access can contribute to higher rates of poverty among children in vulnerable families, including First Nations children living on reserve, children in women-led households who have fled violence, children of migrant workers, and undocumented children. Acknowledge the role of systemic inequities in entrenching poverty Implement Gender Based Analysis+ for all policies and programs. Collect disaggregated data at the provincial level to better inform targeted, supportive policies. Invest in systems that will reduce inequities in the workplace, including employment equity programs that set clear targets, are monitored, and are tied to community benefits agreements. Ensure Income Supports Work Together to Bring All Incomes up to the Low Income Measure Reduce barriers to access and increase the OCB, ODSP, and OW benefits. Stop the clawbacks of emergency benefits. Ensure Equitable Access to Safe, High Quality, Affordable Childcare & Public Education Provide adequate base funding for licensed childcare providers. Provide funding for smaller class sizes and capital funding for ventilation improvements. Close the digital divide for virtual learners living in low income. Implement Labour Reforms to Keep Workers and their Families Safe Raise the minimum wage. Require employers to provide paid sick leave: 7 permanent days and an additional 14 days during public health emergencies. Close wage gaps by legislating equal pay for equal work. Reduce Risk of Homelessness through Support for Tenants and Precariously Housed People Re-instate the eviction moratorium as long as the pandemic lasts, and re- institute effective rent control. Allow appeals for all LTB decisions made after August 1, 2020. This snapshot is an update to Ontario Campaign 2000's full April 2020 report on child poverty, and a companion piece to Campaign 2000's National Report Card on Child Poverty, released December 2020. Lone parent families are predominantly headed by women. In 2018, median total income for female-led families was $20,000 lower than those headed by males. While this gap showed slight improvement from 2015-16, it has since remained static, as female-led family income continues to lag by nearly 30%. Commit to reducing child poverty by 50% by 2025 Follow this commitment with bold policy choices & significant investments in support of low income children and families. [email protected] www.ontariocampaign2000.ca twitter: @ONCampaign2000 Beat the Pandemic in Every Community Fund site-specific, community-led interventions to ensure improved access to testing and quarantine supports, and ensure vaccine access is provided to the most vulnerable groups first, regardless of status or geographic location. Even well-designed government transfers are not enough to end child poverty. 1 Statistics Canada, Custom Tabulation. T1 Family File, 2018. 2 Statistics Canada, Custom Tabulation, 2016. Generously provided by Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. 1 2 3 3 Statistics Canada, Table: 11-10-0011-01 (formerly CANSIM 111-0011), “Census families by age of older partner or parent and number of children”, 2018. Based on Ontario data from the last few years, we expected to see a strong continuation of rate reduction, but after looking at the latest comprehensive data (2018), we wonder: what happened in Ontario to slow the downward trend? We can also anticipate that the pandemic has had an even more severe effect on child poverty rates over the last year. The Government of Ontario has no time to lose in making policy decisions and funding interventions designed to support all children and families living in poverty.

Upload: others

Post on 26-Dec-2021

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ontario Campaign 2000 December 2020 Update

*

Ontario Campaign 2000 December 2020 Update

Decreases in the rate of childpoverty have slowed

Child PovertyRates in Ontario 

Source: Statistics Canada, T1 Family Files. After-tax low income status of tax filers anddependents based on Census Family Low Income Measure (CFLIM-AT), by family type andfamily type composition. 2014-2018. Table: 11-10-0018-01 (formerly CANSIM 111-0046). 

Per

cen

tage

of C

hild

ren

in L

ow

Inco

me

Ontario Child Poverty Rate, 2014-2018 (Under18)

22.5%21.1%

19.5%18.7% 18.0%

2014 2015 2016 2017 20180

5

10

15

20

25

18.2% NationalRate 2018

507,760children

544,710children

586,150children

619,170children

523,990children

2015 2016 2017 20180

5

10

15

20

Source for CFLIM data: Statistics Canada. T1 Family Files. After-tax low income status of taxfilers and dependants based on Census Family Low Income Measure (CFLIM-AT), by family typeand family type composition, 2018. Table: 11-10-0018-01 (formerly CANSIM 111-0046)Source for MBM data: Statistics Canada. Market Basket Measure Low income statistics by age,sex and economic family type. Table: 11-10-0135-01 (formerly CANSIM 206-0041)

CF LIM18.0%

MBM12.5%

Ontario  Child Poverty Rate Comparison: MBM vs  CFLIM

507,760childrenin lowincome

338,000 childrenin lowincome

Source: Statistics Canada. T1 Family Files. Table F-20 After-tax low income status of censusfamilies (census family low income measures, CFLIM-AT) by family type and family composition,adjusted methodology, 2018.

Depth of Family Poverty in Ontario

After-Tax Median Income Poverty Gap

Lone Parent with 1Child

Couple with 1 Child Lone Parent with 2Children

Couple with 2Children

0

10k

20k

30k

40k

LIM AT: $30,877

LIM AT: $37,816 LIM AT: $37,816

LIM AT: $43,666

$19,580 $27,090 $26,170 $33,840

$11,297

$10,276 $11,646

$9,826

Per

cen

tage

of C

hild

ren

in P

over

ty

Impact of Government Transfers (Under 18)

Poverty Rate Without Transfers Poverty Rate With Transfers

Canada Ontario0

10

20

30 46.6%lowerwith

transfers

45.0%lowerwith

transfers33.1% 33.7%

18.2% 18.0%

Source: Statistics Canada, Center for income and socioeconomic well-being statistics, Annual IncomeEstimates for Census Families and Individuals (T1 Family File), Custom Tabulation, 2018.

No matter how you measure it,children in poverty are fallingthrough the cracks

Lone Parents Experience LargePoverty Gaps; and Movement outof Poverty for Many Families isSlowing

Without Government Benefits,Many More Children would livein Poverty

Systemic inequities have deepened during the pandemic, and the Ontario Government has been Missingin Action on meaningful reform. Treading water on ending child poverty is unacceptable at any time;avoiding policy changes that would help to stem pandemic-related impacts on children and familiesliving in poverty is inexcusable. Ontario Campaign 2000 provides the following recommendations:

To read Ontario Campaign 2000's full set of recommendations as published in the April 2020 Report on ChildPoverty please visit  www.ontariocampaign2000.ca. National, provincial, and territorial report cards can befound at www.campaign2000.ca.

The child poverty rate in Ontario hasdecreased annually since 2013, butrecent reductions are marginal - lessthan a percentage a year since 2015.The under-6 child poverty rate is19.5% (170,730 children), with a ratereduction of 0.7% from 2017-2018; only 5560 young children moved outof poverty in 2018.Children whose families facemarginalization and who are impactedby the ongoing legacy of colonizationface higher rates of poverty than theprovincial average, ranging from 21% forMétis children, 31% for Inuit children,32% for non-status FN children, 37% forStatus FN children off reserve, and 48%for Status FN children on reserve.

Whether rates are measured by MBM orCFLIM-AT, the trend is the same: The rateof reduction has slowed or stopped.

Using the Market Basket Measure (MBM),instead of the Census Family LowIncome Measure (After-Tax) (CFLIM-AT), to measure poverty doesn’t showthe whole picture.

In Ontario, 169,760 children live in thepoverty gap between the MBM and theCFLIM-AT. If the government isn’trecognizing these children, theirfamilies may be excluded from povertyreduction solutions.

1 in 7 families in Ontario live inpoverty. This number increases to 1 in3 for lone parent families.

Regardless of family type, socialassistance rates in Ontario have beenfairly flat since the mid-1990s, and do notbring income rates up to the CFLIM-AT.

Lone parent families living in lowincome face larger wealth gaps thancouple families with children living inlow income.

Government transfers like the CanadaChild Benefit and the Ontario ChildBenefit have a massive impact ondriving down the child poverty rate.The Ontario Child Benefit is indexed tothe rate of inflation, but has not beensignificantly increased in years.Barriers to access can contribute tohigher rates of poverty among childrenin vulnerable families, including FirstNations children living on reserve,children in women-led households whohave fled violence, children of migrantworkers, and undocumented children.

Acknowledge the role of systemicinequities in entrenching povertyImplement Gender Based Analysis+for all policies and programs. Collectdisaggregated data at the provinciallevel to better inform targeted,supportive policies. Invest in systemsthat will reduce inequities in theworkplace, including employmentequity programs that set cleartargets, are monitored, and are tiedto community benefits agreements.

Ensure Income Supports WorkTogether to Bring All Incomes up tothe Low Income MeasureReduce barriers to access andincrease the OCB, ODSP, and OWbenefits. Stop the clawbacks ofemergency benefits. 

Ensure Equitable Access to Safe, HighQuality, Affordable Childcare & PublicEducationProvide adequate base funding forlicensed childcare providers. Providefunding for smaller class sizes andcapital funding for ventilationimprovements. Close the digital dividefor virtual learners living in low income.

Implement Labour Reforms to KeepWorkers and their Families SafeRaise the minimum wage. Requireemployers to provide paid sick leave: 7 permanent days and an additional14 days during public healthemergencies. Close wage gaps bylegislating equal pay for equal work.

Reduce Risk of Homelessnessthrough Support for Tenants andPrecariously Housed PeopleRe-instate the eviction moratorium aslong as the pandemic lasts, and re-institute effective rent control. Allowappeals for all LTB decisions made afterAugust 1, 2020.

This snapshot is an update to Ontario Campaign 2000's full April 2020 report on child poverty, and acompanion piece to Campaign 2000's National Report Card on Child Poverty, released December 2020.

Lone parent families are predominantlyheaded by women. In 2018, median totalincome for female-led families was$20,000 lower than those headed bymales.  While this gap showed slightimprovement from 2015-16, it has sinceremained static, as female-led familyincome continues to lag by nearly 30%.

Commit to reducing child poverty by50% by 2025Follow this commitment with bold policy choices & significantinvestments in support of lowincome children and families.

[email protected]

twitter: @ONCampaign2000

Beat the Pandemic in EveryCommunity Fund site-specific, community-ledinterventions to ensure improvedaccess to testing and quarantinesupports, and ensure vaccine accessis provided to the most vulnerablegroups first, regardless of status orgeographic location.

Even well-designed governmenttransfers are not enough to end childpoverty.

1 Statistics Canada, Custom Tabulation. T1 Family File, 2018.2 Statistics Canada, Custom Tabulation, 2016. Generously provided by Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.

1

2

3

3 Statistics Canada, Table: 11-10-0011-01 (formerly CANSIM 111-0011), “Census families by age of older partner   or parent and number of children”, 2018.

Based on Ontario data from the last few years, we expected to see a strong continuation of rate reduction,but after looking at the latest comprehensive data (2018), we wonder: what happened in Ontario to slowthe downward trend? We can also anticipate that the pandemic has had an even more severe effect onchild poverty rates over the last year. The Government of Ontario has no time to lose in making policydecisions and funding interventions designed to support all children and families living in poverty.