ongoing minex report card - pages.nist.gov · comparisons (after database consolidation). this also...
TRANSCRIPT
Ongoing MINEX Report Card
Matcher 3T
Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 1
Participant DetailsCompany: ID3 SemiconductorsDate Submitted: 7/3/2012Date Validated: 8/8/2012Date Completed: 8/20/2012
Library Size (bytes) MD5 Checksumlibminex 003F.dll 1576448 0e45173e404d5c1c58a6c7bdd2314075libminex 003F.lib 2272 87fd3470d74c0c356b7d5a95825e59f8
NOTE: NIST plans to decertify Windows-based libraries in MINEX III.
Compliance Test ResultsThe following presents PIV compliance results per the criteria detailed in NIST Special Publication 800-76-2:Biometric Specifications for Personal Identity Verification.
PIV Level One: PASS• Must match templates from all certified template generators with an FNMRFMR(0.01) ≤ 0.01 using two
fingers (4.5.2.1-4). 3
PIV Level Two: FAIL• Must pass PIV level one compliance. 3• Native template generator must pass level one compliance. 7• Must match templates from native template generator with an FNMRFMR(0.0001) ≤ 0.02 using one finger
(4.5.3-2) 7
Notes• This report will be updated as new matching algorithms and template generators pass the compliance
test. These updates will not change the PASS/FAIL decision above.
• NIST reserves the right to decertify a matcher if it later discovers the matcher violates PIV specificationsin some previously undetected way.
1 Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 2
Contents
Participant Details 1
Compliance Test Results 1
Notes 1
1 Introduction 3
2 Methodology 32.1 Dataset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32.2 Accuracy Metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32.3 Interoperability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3 Results 53.1 Single Finger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53.2 Two Finger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93.3 Threshold Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123.4 Q-Q Plot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133.5 Minutiae Count Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4 Performance Tables 15
5 References 23
List of Figures1 MINEX Interoperability Test Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 DET (Single Finger) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 DET (Right Index) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 DET (Left Index) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 FNMR @ FMR = 0.01 (Single Finger) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 DET Scatterplot (Single Finger) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 DET (Two Finger) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 FNMR @ FMR = 0.01 (Two Finger) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 DET Scatterplot (Two Finger) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1110 Cummulative Score Functions (Single Finger) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1211 Cummulative Score Functions (Two Finger) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1212 Q-Q Plot (Left vs. Right Index) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1313 FNMR and FMR vs. Minutiae Count . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1414 FNMR and FMR vs. Minutiae Count . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
List of Tables1 Threshold calibration table . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 Single finger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153 Right index finger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174 Left index finger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195 Two finger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2 Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 3
1 IntroductionThis report card presents measurements of performance and interoperability for a single fingerprint matchingalgorithm submitted to NIST as part of the ongoing MINEX Evaluation. It reports whether the matcher passesthe technical requirements for PIV-compliance described in the NIST Special Publication 800-76-2: BiometricSpecifications for Personal Identity Verification.
2 MethodologyTesting is performed at a NIST facility. Each participant’s submission is validated by NIST (http://www.nist.gov/itl/iad/ig/ominex.cfm) before undergoing full testing to ensure it operates correctly. If the matcher passesthe validation procedure, it is then used to compare standard fingerprint templates. Performance is assessedagainst templates created by a template generation algorithm submitted by the participant as well as templatescreated by other compliant template generators.
2.1 DatasetTesting is performed over a single dataset of sequestered fingerprint images. The images were collected by U.S.Visit at ports of entry into the United States. They consist of Live-scan plain impressions of left and right indexfingers. WSQ [1] compression was applied to all images at a ratio of 15:1. The most recent capture of eachsubject was treated as the authentication sample, and the next most recent as the enrolled sample.
The dataset was divided into 123 962 mated and 124 994 non-mated subject pairings. Since both left and rightindex fingerprints are available for each subject, this provides 247 924 mated and 249 988 nonmated single-fingercomparisons (after database consolidation). This also means that when left and right index fingers are fused atthe score level [2, 6], the sets condense to 123 962 mated and 124 994 nonmated comparison scores.
2.2 Accuracy MetricsCore matching accuracy is presented in the form of Detection Error Tradeoff (DET) plots [5], which show thetrade-off between the False Match Rate (FMR) and the False Non-Match Rate (FNMR) as a decision thresholdis adjusted. Formally, let mi (i = 1 . . .M ) be the ith mated comparison score, and nj (j = 1 . . . N ) the jthnon-mated comparison score. Then the statistics are
FNMR(τ) =1
M
M∑i=1
1{mi < τ}, (1)
FMR(τ) =1
N
N∑j=1
1{nj ≥ τ}. (2)
where 1{A} is the indicator [3] of event A. Equations 1 and 2 define the curve parametrically with the decisionthreshold, τ , as the free parameter. In some figures and tables, FNMR is presented as a function of FMR. Thisrelationship is determined by
FNMRFMR(α) = minτ
{ FNMR(τ) | FMR(τ) ≤ α }, (3)
which reads as the smallest FNMR that can be achieved while maintaining an FMR less than or equal to α, thetargeted FMR. This method of relating the two error statistics ensures FNMR is well-defined for all 0 ≤ α ≤ 1.When the matching algorithm produces only a few unique comparison scores, the maximum threshold, τ0, thatelicits an FMR(τ0) ≤ α may, in fact, be quite a bit lower than α. Thus, Equation 3 imposes a natural penalty onmatching algorithms that produce overly discretized scores.
Some figures show pooled DET accuracy, which is a measure of the accuracy of the matcher against all com-pliant template generators. Accuracy is measured by concatenating all comparison scores involving the matchertogether and computing FMR and FNMR using Equations 2 and 1. This roughly simulates performance for abiometric system that employs one matcher and templates created by several template generators.
3 Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 4
Figure 1: MINEX Interoperability Test Setup
2.3 InteroperabilityInteroperability is tested in a manner similar to Scenario 1 from the MINEX Evaluation Report [4] (see Figure1). An enrolment template is prepared using submission X. Submission Y is used to prepare the authenticationtemplate and perform the match. The authentication template is always prepared by the same submission usedto compare the templates. However, enrolment templates need not originate from the same submission. Whenthey do, we refer to it as ”native” mode.
4 Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 5
3 ResultsThis section details the performance of matcher 3T when it compares verification templates created by its owntemplate generator to enrolment templates created by all MINEX compliant template generators. Sections 3.1and 3.2 present accuracy results for single finger and two finger matching respectively. Sections 3.3 and 3.4present potentially useful statistics not directly related to the performance of the matcher.
3.1 Single FingerSinge finger comparison results show the combined results for left and right index comparisons. For reference,NIST Special Publication 800-76-2 requires that the matcher and template generator achieve a native accuracy ofFNMRFMR(0.0001) ≤ 0.02.
Last Updated: Sep 10, 2015
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
3T
3T4Z
4Z4Z
4Z
4Z
4Z
4Z4Z
4Z
4Z
4Z
4Z
4Z
4Z
4Z
4Z
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
A
A1G
1GN
N
NN
NN
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
0.005
0.010
0.020
0.050
0.0001 0.0002 0.0005 0.0010 0.0020 0.0050 0.0100 0.0200 0.0500 0.1000 0.2000FMR
FN
MR
Single FingerMatcher = 3T, Num Mated = 247924, Num Nonmated = 249988
Figure 2: Single finger DET statistics for matcher 3T. Each box shows the distribution of FNMRs at a fixed FMR acrossall MINEX compliant template generators. The ends of the whiskers show the minimum and maximum FNMRs. Theorange DET curve shows pooled performance against all template generators.
5 Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 6
Last Updated: Sep 10, 2015
●
●●
●●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
3T3T
4Z 4Z 3T4Z
4Z4Z
4Z 4Z 4Z4Z
4Z4Z
4Z4Z
4Z
4Z
●
●●
●●
●
●●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
4LA
2WA 1G 1G
NN
N N NN
NN
NN
N
3B
0.002
0.005
0.010
0.020
0.050
0.0001 0.0002 0.0005 0.0010 0.0020 0.0050 0.0100 0.0200 0.0500 0.1000 0.2000FMR
FN
MR
Right Index FingerMatcher = 3T, Num Mated = 123962, Num Nonmated = 124994
Figure 3: Right index finger DET statistics for matcher 3T. Each box shows the distribution of FNMR at a fixed FMRacross all MINEX compliant template generators. The ends of the whiskers show the minimum and maximum FNMRs.The orange DET curve shows pooled performance against all template generators.
Last Updated: Sep 10, 2015
●
●●
●●
●
●●
●●
●
●●
●●
●
●
●
4Z3T
4Z4Z 4Z 4Z
4Z3T
3T3T 3T
4Z4Z
3T2Y
3T
4Z
4Z
●
●●
●●
●
●●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
A1G 1G 1G
1G NN
NN N
NN
NN
NN
N
N
0.005
0.010
0.020
0.050
0.100
0.0001 0.0002 0.0005 0.0010 0.0020 0.0050 0.0100 0.0200 0.0500 0.1000 0.2000FMR
FN
MR
Left Index FingerMatcher = 3T, Num Mated = 123962, Num Nonmated = 124994
Figure 4: Left index finger DET statistics for matcher 3T. Each box shows the distribution of FNMRs at a fixed FMRacross all MINEX compliant template generators. The ends of whiskers show the minimum and maximum FNMRs. Theorange DET curve shows pooled performance against all template generators.
6 Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 7
Last Updated: Sep 10, 2015 0.0643
0.0424
0.0402
0.0413
0.0446
0.0397
0.0453
0.0601
0.0278
0.0483
0.06020.0603
0.0398
0.0427
0.0448
0.0366
0.0318
0.0470
0.0402
0.0451
0.0534
0.0387
0.0380
0.0391
0.0536
0.0278
0.0338
0.0295
0.0277
0.0509
0.0277
0.0332
0.0412
0.0277
0.0383
0.0584
0.0249
0.0301
0.0533
0.04170.0416
0.0247
0.0401
0.0453
0.0391
0.0330
0.0425
0.0410
0.0232
0.0453
0.0413
0.0313
0.0453
0.0387
0.0353
0.0605
0.0353
0.0397
0.0261
0.0397
0.0255
0.0380
0.0376
0.0430
0.0372
0.0233
A4L1G1FN
2W2J2D3B2O1D1YG
3M3V4C2C1M
E4W1L3Q
B3D3F
3WD
2R3SC
2A3H1J4N4Q
F3N2I
4F2F2T4T2G4U4X1N4K4M2L2Q3O1T3Z3A2M1C2K2N2P2S4O4S2Y3G4Z3T
0.04 0.06FNMR
Tem
plat
e G
ener
ator
Single FingerMatcher = 3T, Num Mated = 247924, Num Nonmated = 249988
Figure 5: Single finger FNMRs at FMR = 0.0001 when matcher 3T compares templates created by different templategenerators. The ends of the whiskers show the minimum and maximum FNMRs. Each box represents uncertainty aboutthe true FNMR. The box edges mark the 50% confidence intervals while the whiskers mark the 90% confindence intervals.The numbers on the right show the actual computed FNMRs.
7 Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 8
Last
Upd
ated
: Sep
10,
201
5
●
●●
●
●
● ●●
●
●●●
●
●●●
●●
●
●
●
● ●
●●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
● ●●
●
●
●●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
● ●
●
●● ●
●
●●
● ●
●
●
0.00
5
0.01
0
0.02
0
0.05
0
0.00
005
0.00
010
0.00
020
0.00
050
0.00
100
0.00
200
0.00
500
0.01
000
0.02
000
0.05
000
0.10
000
0.20
000
FM
R
FNMR
Sin
gle
Fin
ger
Mat
cher
= 3
T,
Num
Mat
ed =
247
924,
N
um N
onm
ated
= 2
4998
8
Figu
re6:
Sing
lefin
gerD
ETac
cura
cyfo
rmat
cher
3T.E
ach
clus
tero
fpoi
ntsr
epre
sent
sthe
vari
atio
nin
FMR
and
FNM
Rac
ross
MIN
EXco
mpl
iant
tem
plat
egen
erat
ors
ata
fixed
deci
sion
thre
shol
d.Ea
chpo
int
corr
espo
nds
toan
(FM
R,F
NM
R)
pair
for
asp
ecifi
cte
mpl
ate
gene
rato
rat
apa
rtic
ular
deci
sion
thre
shol
d.Fo
urcl
uste
rsar
epr
oduc
edco
rres
pond
ing
tofo
urde
cisi
onth
resh
olds
whi
chpr
oduc
epo
oled
FMR
sof
10−1,1
0−2,1
0−3,a
nd10
−4.
The
oran
geD
ETcu
rve
show
spo
oled
perf
orm
ance
agai
nsta
llte
mpl
ate
gene
rato
rs.
8 Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 9
3.2 Two FingerThis section presents accuracy when matcher 3T compares templates created by all MINEX compliant templategenerators. Two-finger fusion is achieved by averaging the scores for left and right index fingers for each person.NIST Special Publication 800-76-2 requires the matcher to achieve an accuracy of FNMRFMR(0.01) ≤ 0.01 for allMINEX compliant template generators.
Last Updated: Sep 10, 2015
●Conformance Requirement
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
3T3T
3T3T
2Y2Y
2Y2Y
2Y2Y
2Y
2Y
4Z4S
4S
4Z
4S
3M
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
N
NN
NN
N
NN
NN
N
N
N
N
N
N
3B
3B
0.0002
0.0005
0.0010
0.0020
0.0050
0.0100
0.0001 0.0002 0.0005 0.0010 0.0020 0.0050 0.0100 0.0200 0.0500 0.1000 0.2000FMR
FN
MR
Two FingerMatcher = 3T, Num Mated = 247924, Num Nonmated = 249988
Figure 7: Two finger DET statistics for matcher 3T. Each box shows the distribution of FNMRs at a fixed FMR across allMINEX compliant template generators. The whisker ends show the minimum and maximum FNMRs. The orange DETcurve shows pooled performance against all template generators. Score-level fusion is achieved by averaging the scores forleft and right index fingers.
9 Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 10
Last Updated: Sep 10, 2015
0.0026
0.0017
0.0017
0.0020
0.0022
0.0017
0.0014
0.0036
0.0012
0.0025
0.00330.0033
0.0015
0.0017
0.0020
0.0019
0.0014
0.0019
0.0017
0.0018
0.0026
0.0014
0.0014
0.0021
0.0025
0.0011
0.0015
0.0010
0.0010
0.0019
0.0010
0.0012
0.0018
0.0010
0.0016
0.0024
0.0009
0.0010
0.0026
0.0018
0.0017
0.0010
0.0018
0.0012
0.0021
0.0016
0.0015
0.0017
0.0009
0.0012
0.0018
0.0012
0.0012
0.0017
0.0014
0.0022
0.0014
0.0018
0.0012
0.0013
0.0010
0.0017
0.00120.0012
0.0014
0.0009
N1G1F3B2D
A1D2J
2W4LE
3N2ID
1M1Y2O1N2C2R3D3W3H4N3FC
2A4FBF
1L4T3S2T3O2L3Q1J1TG
4X2F4K4M2G4Q4W4U3M3V4C2Q3Z1C4O2K2P2S3G2N3A2M4S3T4Z2Y
0.0008 0.0010 0.0020 0.0040FNMR
Tem
plat
e G
ener
ator
Two FingerMatcher = 3T, Num Mated = 247924, Num Nonmated = 249988
Figure 8: Two finger FNMR at FMR=0.01 when matcher 3T compares templates created by different template generators.Each box represents uncertainty about the true FNMR. The box edges mark the 50% confidence intervals while the whiskersmark the 90% confindence intervals. The numbers on the right show the actual computed FNMRs. Score-level fusion isachieved by averaging the scores for left and right index fingers.
10 Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 11
Last
Upd
ated
: Sep
10,
201
5
●C
onfo
rman
ce R
equi
rem
ent
●
●
●
●
●
● ●●
●
●●●
●●●
●
●●
●
●
●
●●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
● ●●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
● ●
●
●
● ●
●
●●
●●
●
●
0.00
05
0.00
10
0.00
20
0.00
50
0.01
00
0.00
005
0.00
010
0.00
020
0.00
050
0.00
100
0.00
200
0.00
500
0.01
000
0.02
000
0.05
000
0.10
000
0.20
000
FM
R
FNMR
Two
Fin
ger
Mat
cher
= 3
T,
Num
Mat
ed =
247
924,
N
um N
onm
ated
= 2
4998
8
Figu
re9:
Two
finge
rD
ETac
cura
cyfo
rm
atch
er3T
.Eac
hcl
uste
rof
poin
tsre
pres
ents
the
vari
atio
nin
FMR
and
FNM
Rac
ross
MIN
EXco
mpl
iant
tem
plat
ege
nera
tors
ata
fixed
deci
sion
thre
shol
d.Ea
chpo
int
corr
espo
nds
toan
(FM
R,F
NM
R)
pair
for
asp
ecifi
cte
mpl
ate
gene
rato
rat
apa
rtic
ular
deci
sion
thre
shol
d.Fo
urcl
uste
rsar
epr
oduc
edco
rres
pond
ing
tofo
urde
cisi
onth
resh
olds
whi
chpr
oduc
epo
oled
FMR
sof
10−1,1
0−2,1
0−3,a
nd10
−4.
The
oran
geD
ETcu
rve
show
spo
oled
perf
orm
ance
agai
nsta
llte
mpl
ate
gene
rato
rs.S
core
-leve
lfus
ion
isac
hiev
edby
aver
agin
gth
esc
ores
for
left
and
righ
tind
exfin
gers
.
11 Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 12
3.3 Threshold StatisticsResults in this section are computed by concatenating comparison scores for matcher 3T across all MINEXcompliant template generators.
Last Updated: Oct 08, 2015
0.00005
0.00010
0.00020
0.00050
0.00100
0.00200
0.00500
0.01000
0.02000
0.05000
0.10000
0.20000
1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500Threshold
FMR, Left IndexFMR, Right IndexFNMR, Left IndexFNMR, Right Index
Single FingerMatcher = 3T, Num Mated = 247924, Num Nonmated = 249988
Figure 10: Single finger FMR and FNMR as a function of score threshold for matcher 3T using templates created by allMINEX compliant template generators. Separate curves are presented for left and right index fingers.
Last Updated: Oct 08, 2015
0.00005
0.00010
0.00020
0.00050
0.00100
0.00200
0.00500
0.01000
0.02000
0.05000
0.10000
0.20000
1000 1500 2000 2500Threshold
FMRFNMR
Two FingerMatcher = 3T, Num Mated = 247924, Num Nonmated = 249988
Figure 11: Two finger FMR and FNMR as a function of score threshold for matcher 3T using templates created by allMINEX compliant template generators. Score-level fusion is achieved by averaging scores for the left and right indexfingers.
FMR=0.1 FMR=0.01 FMR=0.001 FMR=0.0001Right index finger 1343.0 1896 2455.0 3043Left index finger 1357.0 1919 2485.0 3092
Single finger 1350.0 1908 2469.0 3061Two finger 1253.5 1625 1973.5 2335
Table 1: Threshold calibration table. The cells show the thresholds corresponding to the FMR indicated by the columnheader.
12 Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 13
3.4 Q-Q PlotThe Q-Q plot compares two probability distributions. It plots the quantile of one distribution as a function ofthe other. If the curve follows the y = x line, then the distributions are identical. If the FMR curve is above they = x line, then the left index finger tends to produce lower non-mated scores than the left index finger. If theFNMR curve is above the y = x line, then the left index finger tends to produce lower mated scores than the leftindex finger. A jagged and/or truncated cur ve is indicative of discretized scores.
Last Updated: Oct 09, 2015
0.0001
0.0010
0.0100
0.1000
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000Right Index Finger
Left
Inde
x F
inge
r
FMRFNMR
Single FingerMatcher = 3T, Num Mated = 247924, Num Nonmated = 249988
Figure 12: Q-Q plot comparing score distributions for left and right index fingers.
13 Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 14
3.5 Minutiae Count StatisticsThis section shows how the number of minutia found in the samples affects recognition accuracy. To be robust tospoofing and other active attacks, the algorithm should not allow FMR to rise sharply as the number of availableminutia decreases. Nor should it allow FMR to rise sharply as the number of detected minutia increases.
Last Updated: Oct 09, 20150.008
0.009
0.010
0.020
40 60 80 100 120Maximum Number of Minutiae
FMRFNMR
Single FingerMatcher = 3T, Template Generator = 3T, Num Mated = 247924, Num Nonmated = 249988
Figure 13: FNMR and FMR as a function of the number of minutia found by the template generator. The vertical axisdefines a filter criterion such that FNMR and FMR are computed over only those comparisons where at least one of thecompared templates has no more than the specified number of minutia. The threshold is fixed separately for FNMR andFMR to elicit an error rate of approximately 0.01 over unfiltered comparisons.
Last Updated: Oct 09, 2015
0.008
0.009
0.010
0.020
20 40 60Minimum Number of Minutiae
FMRFNMR
Single FingerMatcher = 3T, Template Generator = 3T, Num Mated = 247924, Num Nonmated = 249988
Figure 14: FNMR and FMR as a function of the number of minutia found by the template generator. The vertical axisdefines a filter criterion such that FNMR and FMR are computed over only those comparisons where at least one of thecompared templates has at least the indicated number of minutia. The threshold is fixed separately for FNMR and FMRto elicit an error rate of approximately 0.01 over unfiltered comparisons.
14 Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 15
4 Performance TablesThe following tables present accuracy number, including estimates of uncertainty in the form of 90% confidencebounds. These tables are provided because most of the figures in the main body of this report do not presentnumerical results.
Table 2: Single finger FNMRs at various FMRs when matcher 3T compares templates created by itstemplate generator and PIV-compliant template generators.
Enroller FNMR @ FMR=0.01 FNMR @ FMR=0.001 FNMR @ FMR=0.0001A 0.0220± 0.0005 0.0378± 0.0006 0.0643± 0.0008B 0.0147± 0.0004 0.0255± 0.0005 0.0424± 0.0007C 0.0149± 0.0004 0.0252± 0.0005 0.0402± 0.0006D 0.0155± 0.0004 0.0263± 0.0005 0.0413± 0.0007E 0.0175± 0.0004 0.0290± 0.0006 0.0446± 0.0007F 0.0149± 0.0004 0.0251± 0.0005 0.0397± 0.0006G 0.0146± 0.0004 0.0259± 0.0005 0.0453± 0.0007N 0.0241± 0.0005 0.0395± 0.0006 0.0601± 0.00081C 0.0112± 0.0003 0.0182± 0.0004 0.0278± 0.00051D 0.0188± 0.0004 0.0310± 0.0006 0.0483± 0.00071F 0.0229± 0.0005 0.0392± 0.0006 0.0602± 0.00081G 0.0230± 0.0005 0.0393± 0.0006 0.0603± 0.00081J 0.0140± 0.0004 0.0232± 0.0005 0.0398± 0.00061L 0.0149± 0.0004 0.0260± 0.0005 0.0427± 0.00071M 0.0163± 0.0004 0.0283± 0.0005 0.0448± 0.00071N 0.0149± 0.0004 0.0248± 0.0005 0.0366± 0.00061T 0.0127± 0.0004 0.0206± 0.0005 0.0318± 0.00061Y 0.0161± 0.0004 0.0280± 0.0005 0.0470± 0.00072A 0.0149± 0.0004 0.0252± 0.0005 0.0402± 0.00062C 0.0160± 0.0004 0.0276± 0.0005 0.0451± 0.00072D 0.0204± 0.0005 0.0357± 0.0006 0.0534± 0.00072F 0.0145± 0.0004 0.0253± 0.0005 0.0387± 0.00062G 0.0136± 0.0004 0.0239± 0.0005 0.0380± 0.00062I 0.0157± 0.0004 0.0257± 0.0005 0.0391± 0.00062J 0.0195± 0.0005 0.0335± 0.0006 0.0536± 0.00072K 0.0106± 0.0003 0.0178± 0.0004 0.0278± 0.00052L 0.0135± 0.0004 0.0219± 0.0005 0.0338± 0.00062M 0.0108± 0.0003 0.0180± 0.0004 0.0295± 0.00062N 0.0104± 0.0003 0.0176± 0.0004 0.0277± 0.00052O 0.0172± 0.0004 0.0312± 0.0006 0.0509± 0.00072P 0.0106± 0.0003 0.0177± 0.0004 0.0277± 0.00052Q 0.0115± 0.0004 0.0194± 0.0005 0.0332± 0.00062R 0.0154± 0.0004 0.0266± 0.0005 0.0412± 0.00072S 0.0106± 0.0003 0.0177± 0.0004 0.0277± 0.00052T 0.0147± 0.0004 0.0248± 0.0005 0.0383± 0.00062W 0.0203± 0.0005 0.0358± 0.0006 0.0584± 0.00082Y 0.0093± 0.0003 0.0156± 0.0004 0.0249± 0.00053A 0.0108± 0.0003 0.0184± 0.0004 0.0301± 0.00063B 0.0199± 0.0005 0.0327± 0.0006 0.0533± 0.00073D 0.0155± 0.0004 0.0271± 0.0005 0.0417± 0.0007
15 Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 16
Table 2: (continued)
Enroller FNMR @ FMR=0.01 FNMR @ FMR=0.001 FNMR @ FMR=0.00013F 0.0148± 0.0004 0.0252± 0.0005 0.0416± 0.00073G 0.0100± 0.0003 0.0170± 0.0004 0.0247± 0.00053H 0.0157± 0.0004 0.0252± 0.0005 0.0401± 0.00063M 0.0135± 0.0004 0.0251± 0.0005 0.0453± 0.00073N 0.0156± 0.0004 0.0256± 0.0005 0.0391± 0.00063O 0.0131± 0.0004 0.0212± 0.0005 0.0330± 0.00063Q 0.0147± 0.0004 0.0264± 0.0005 0.0425± 0.00073S 0.0144± 0.0004 0.0240± 0.0005 0.0410± 0.00073T 0.0092± 0.0003 0.0152± 0.0004 0.0232± 0.00053V 0.0135± 0.0004 0.0251± 0.0005 0.0453± 0.00073W 0.0149± 0.0004 0.0251± 0.0005 0.0413± 0.00073Z 0.0115± 0.0004 0.0195± 0.0005 0.0313± 0.00064C 0.0135± 0.0004 0.0251± 0.0005 0.0453± 0.00074F 0.0145± 0.0004 0.0247± 0.0005 0.0387± 0.00064K 0.0133± 0.0004 0.0224± 0.0005 0.0353± 0.00064L 0.0202± 0.0005 0.0350± 0.0006 0.0605± 0.00084M 0.0133± 0.0004 0.0224± 0.0005 0.0353± 0.00064N 0.0139± 0.0004 0.0234± 0.0005 0.0397± 0.00064O 0.0106± 0.0003 0.0171± 0.0004 0.0261± 0.00054Q 0.0128± 0.0004 0.0225± 0.0005 0.0397± 0.00064S 0.0099± 0.0003 0.0165± 0.0004 0.0255± 0.00054T 0.0138± 0.0004 0.0234± 0.0005 0.0380± 0.00064U 0.0128± 0.0004 0.0229± 0.0005 0.0376± 0.00064W 0.0133± 0.0004 0.0251± 0.0005 0.0430± 0.00074X 0.0126± 0.0004 0.0221± 0.0005 0.0372± 0.00064Z 0.0092± 0.0003 0.0149± 0.0004 0.0233± 0.0005
16 Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 17
Table 3: Right index finger FNMRs at various FMRs when matcher 3T compares templates created byits template generator and PIV-compliant template generators.
Enroller FNMR @ FMR=0.01 FNMR @ FMR=0.001 FNMR @ FMR=0.0001A 0.0154± 0.0006 0.0272± 0.0008 0.0471± 0.0010B 0.0109± 0.0005 0.0190± 0.0006 0.0331± 0.0008C 0.0105± 0.0005 0.0183± 0.0006 0.0288± 0.0008D 0.0111± 0.0005 0.0195± 0.0006 0.0318± 0.0008E 0.0130± 0.0005 0.0217± 0.0007 0.0348± 0.0009F 0.0104± 0.0005 0.0182± 0.0006 0.0289± 0.0008G 0.0101± 0.0005 0.0189± 0.0006 0.0318± 0.0008N 0.0172± 0.0006 0.0282± 0.0008 0.0464± 0.00101C 0.0081± 0.0004 0.0133± 0.0005 0.0197± 0.00061D 0.0142± 0.0006 0.0245± 0.0007 0.0379± 0.00091F 0.0165± 0.0006 0.0282± 0.0008 0.0449± 0.00101G 0.0166± 0.0006 0.0283± 0.0008 0.0450± 0.00101J 0.0097± 0.0005 0.0166± 0.0006 0.0282± 0.00081L 0.0101± 0.0005 0.0187± 0.0006 0.0328± 0.00081M 0.0116± 0.0005 0.0206± 0.0007 0.0343± 0.00091N 0.0102± 0.0005 0.0175± 0.0006 0.0254± 0.00071T 0.0089± 0.0004 0.0146± 0.0006 0.0226± 0.00071Y 0.0117± 0.0005 0.0211± 0.0007 0.0375± 0.00092A 0.0105± 0.0005 0.0183± 0.0006 0.0288± 0.00082C 0.0109± 0.0005 0.0192± 0.0006 0.0319± 0.00082D 0.0143± 0.0006 0.0259± 0.0007 0.0437± 0.00102F 0.0100± 0.0005 0.0173± 0.0006 0.0285± 0.00082G 0.0092± 0.0004 0.0165± 0.0006 0.0275± 0.00082I 0.0108± 0.0005 0.0184± 0.0006 0.0299± 0.00082J 0.0141± 0.0006 0.0256± 0.0007 0.0428± 0.00092K 0.0071± 0.0004 0.0128± 0.0005 0.0204± 0.00072L 0.0096± 0.0005 0.0157± 0.0006 0.0244± 0.00072M 0.0075± 0.0004 0.0128± 0.0005 0.0206± 0.00072N 0.0070± 0.0004 0.0126± 0.0005 0.0197± 0.00072O 0.0119± 0.0005 0.0230± 0.0007 0.0390± 0.00092P 0.0070± 0.0004 0.0126± 0.0005 0.0196± 0.00062Q 0.0079± 0.0004 0.0139± 0.0005 0.0223± 0.00072R 0.0110± 0.0005 0.0197± 0.0006 0.0314± 0.00082S 0.0070± 0.0004 0.0126± 0.0005 0.0196± 0.00062T 0.0102± 0.0005 0.0177± 0.0006 0.0285± 0.00082W 0.0138± 0.0005 0.0264± 0.0007 0.0457± 0.00102Y 0.0064± 0.0004 0.0111± 0.0005 0.0169± 0.00063A 0.0074± 0.0004 0.0129± 0.0005 0.0228± 0.00073B 0.0142± 0.0006 0.0240± 0.0007 0.0397± 0.00093D 0.0114± 0.0005 0.0204± 0.0007 0.0331± 0.0008
17 Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 18
Table 3: (continued)
Enroller FNMR @ FMR=0.01 FNMR @ FMR=0.001 FNMR @ FMR=0.00013F 0.0104± 0.0005 0.0184± 0.0006 0.0303± 0.00083G 0.0067± 0.0004 0.0121± 0.0005 0.0181± 0.00063H 0.0111± 0.0005 0.0181± 0.0006 0.0310± 0.00083M 0.0095± 0.0005 0.0183± 0.0006 0.0354± 0.00093N 0.0107± 0.0005 0.0182± 0.0006 0.0299± 0.00083O 0.0092± 0.0004 0.0154± 0.0006 0.0247± 0.00073Q 0.0102± 0.0005 0.0195± 0.0006 0.0320± 0.00083S 0.0102± 0.0005 0.0174± 0.0006 0.0310± 0.00083T 0.0065± 0.0004 0.0107± 0.0005 0.0166± 0.00063V 0.0095± 0.0005 0.0183± 0.0006 0.0354± 0.00093W 0.0103± 0.0005 0.0181± 0.0006 0.0310± 0.00083Z 0.0075± 0.0004 0.0132± 0.0005 0.0218± 0.00074C 0.0095± 0.0005 0.0183± 0.0006 0.0354± 0.00094F 0.0101± 0.0005 0.0178± 0.0006 0.0307± 0.00084K 0.0093± 0.0004 0.0159± 0.0006 0.0266± 0.00084L 0.0138± 0.0005 0.0249± 0.0007 0.0471± 0.00104M 0.0093± 0.0004 0.0159± 0.0006 0.0266± 0.00084N 0.0097± 0.0005 0.0172± 0.0006 0.0288± 0.00084O 0.0070± 0.0004 0.0117± 0.0005 0.0182± 0.00064Q 0.0091± 0.0004 0.0162± 0.0006 0.0266± 0.00084S 0.0067± 0.0004 0.0114± 0.0005 0.0174± 0.00064T 0.0098± 0.0005 0.0171± 0.0006 0.0278± 0.00084U 0.0091± 0.0004 0.0167± 0.0006 0.0280± 0.00084W 0.0091± 0.0004 0.0187± 0.0006 0.0325± 0.00084X 0.0090± 0.0004 0.0168± 0.0006 0.0278± 0.00084Z 0.0062± 0.0004 0.0104± 0.0005 0.0175± 0.0006
18 Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 19
Table 4: Left index finger FNMRs at various FMRs when matcher 3T compares templates created by itstemplate generator and PIV-compliant template generators.
Enroller FNMR @ FMR=0.01 FNMR @ FMR=0.001 FNMR @ FMR=0.0001A 0.0287± 0.0008 0.049± 0.001 0.082± 0.001B 0.0185± 0.0006 0.0321± 0.0008 0.052± 0.001C 0.0193± 0.0006 0.0322± 0.0008 0.051± 0.001D 0.0201± 0.0007 0.0331± 0.0008 0.053± 0.001E 0.0222± 0.0007 0.0368± 0.0009 0.055± 0.001F 0.0195± 0.0006 0.0328± 0.0008 0.050± 0.001G 0.0191± 0.0006 0.0332± 0.0008 0.059± 0.001N 0.0314± 0.0008 0.051± 0.001 0.075± 0.0011C 0.0145± 0.0006 0.0233± 0.0007 0.0379± 0.00091D 0.0234± 0.0007 0.0378± 0.0009 0.059± 0.0011F 0.0297± 0.0008 0.050± 0.001 0.079± 0.0011G 0.0298± 0.0008 0.051± 0.001 0.079± 0.0011J 0.0184± 0.0006 0.0299± 0.0008 0.052± 0.0011L 0.0198± 0.0007 0.0330± 0.0008 0.051± 0.0011M 0.0211± 0.0007 0.0357± 0.0009 0.057± 0.0011N 0.0197± 0.0006 0.0324± 0.0008 0.0474± 0.00101T 0.0167± 0.0006 0.0267± 0.0008 0.0407± 0.00091Y 0.0205± 0.0007 0.0347± 0.0009 0.056± 0.0012A 0.0193± 0.0006 0.0322± 0.0008 0.051± 0.0012C 0.0212± 0.0007 0.0362± 0.0009 0.059± 0.0012D 0.0266± 0.0008 0.0459± 0.0010 0.065± 0.0012F 0.0191± 0.0006 0.0342± 0.0008 0.049± 0.0012G 0.0181± 0.0006 0.0314± 0.0008 0.0477± 0.00102I 0.0206± 0.0007 0.0331± 0.0008 0.049± 0.0012J 0.0249± 0.0007 0.0414± 0.0009 0.064± 0.0012K 0.0141± 0.0006 0.0230± 0.0007 0.0354± 0.00092L 0.0176± 0.0006 0.0281± 0.0008 0.0432± 0.00092M 0.0142± 0.0006 0.0232± 0.0007 0.0374± 0.00092N 0.0138± 0.0005 0.0227± 0.0007 0.0362± 0.00092O 0.0226± 0.0007 0.0395± 0.0009 0.063± 0.0012P 0.0141± 0.0006 0.0229± 0.0007 0.0373± 0.00092Q 0.0151± 0.0006 0.0249± 0.0007 0.0436± 0.00102R 0.0199± 0.0007 0.0336± 0.0008 0.051± 0.0012S 0.0141± 0.0006 0.0229± 0.0007 0.0373± 0.00092T 0.0192± 0.0006 0.0318± 0.0008 0.048± 0.0012W 0.0269± 0.0008 0.0454± 0.0010 0.071± 0.0012Y 0.0124± 0.0005 0.0204± 0.0007 0.0342± 0.00083A 0.0142± 0.0006 0.0244± 0.0007 0.0375± 0.00093B 0.0255± 0.0007 0.0413± 0.0009 0.069± 0.0013D 0.0198± 0.0007 0.0337± 0.0008 0.051± 0.001
19 Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 20
Table 4: (continued)
Enroller FNMR @ FMR=0.01 FNMR @ FMR=0.001 FNMR @ FMR=0.00013F 0.0192± 0.0006 0.0327± 0.0008 0.053± 0.0013G 0.0133± 0.0005 0.0219± 0.0007 0.0323± 0.00083H 0.0203± 0.0007 0.0324± 0.0008 0.050± 0.0013M 0.0177± 0.0006 0.0323± 0.0008 0.056± 0.0013N 0.0205± 0.0007 0.0331± 0.0008 0.0481± 0.00103O 0.0172± 0.0006 0.0270± 0.0008 0.0414± 0.00093Q 0.0194± 0.0006 0.0333± 0.0008 0.054± 0.0013S 0.0188± 0.0006 0.0307± 0.0008 0.051± 0.0013T 0.0121± 0.0005 0.0198± 0.0007 0.0303± 0.00083V 0.0177± 0.0006 0.0323± 0.0008 0.056± 0.0013W 0.0194± 0.0006 0.0327± 0.0008 0.055± 0.0013Z 0.0156± 0.0006 0.0260± 0.0007 0.0418± 0.00094C 0.0177± 0.0006 0.0323± 0.0008 0.056± 0.0014F 0.0192± 0.0006 0.0320± 0.0008 0.048± 0.0014K 0.0173± 0.0006 0.0291± 0.0008 0.0440± 0.00104L 0.0266± 0.0008 0.0455± 0.0010 0.071± 0.0014M 0.0173± 0.0006 0.0291± 0.0008 0.0440± 0.00104N 0.0183± 0.0006 0.0300± 0.0008 0.052± 0.0014O 0.0142± 0.0006 0.0225± 0.0007 0.0363± 0.00094Q 0.0166± 0.0006 0.0290± 0.0008 0.054± 0.0014S 0.0134± 0.0005 0.0220± 0.0007 0.0329± 0.00084T 0.0179± 0.0006 0.0301± 0.0008 0.051± 0.0014U 0.0166± 0.0006 0.0292± 0.0008 0.050± 0.0014W 0.0177± 0.0006 0.0320± 0.0008 0.053± 0.0014X 0.0163± 0.0006 0.0277± 0.0008 0.0462± 0.00104Z 0.0121± 0.0005 0.0196± 0.0006 0.0296± 0.0008
20 Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 21
Table 5: Two finger FNMRs at various FMRs when matcher 3T compares templates created by itstemplate generator and PIV-compliant template generators.
Enroller FNMR @ FMR=0.01 FNMR @ FMR=0.001 FNMR @ FMR=0.0001A 0.0026± 0.0002 0.0047± 0.0002 0.0080± 0.0003B 0.0017± 0.0001 0.0032± 0.0002 0.0056± 0.0002C 0.0017± 0.0001 0.0029± 0.0002 0.0048± 0.0002D 0.0020± 0.0001 0.0035± 0.0002 0.0059± 0.0003E 0.0022± 0.0002 0.0039± 0.0002 0.0062± 0.0003F 0.0017± 0.0001 0.0029± 0.0002 0.0050± 0.0002G 0.0014± 0.0001 0.0027± 0.0002 0.0048± 0.0002N 0.0036± 0.0002 0.0064± 0.0003 0.0102± 0.00031C 0.0012± 0.0001 0.0019± 0.0001 0.0030± 0.00021D 0.0025± 0.0002 0.0046± 0.0002 0.0079± 0.00031F 0.0033± 0.0002 0.0058± 0.0003 0.0100± 0.00031G 0.0033± 0.0002 0.0058± 0.0003 0.0100± 0.00031J 0.0015± 0.0001 0.0028± 0.0002 0.0050± 0.00021L 0.0017± 0.0001 0.0029± 0.0002 0.0053± 0.00021M 0.0020± 0.0001 0.0033± 0.0002 0.0061± 0.00031N 0.0019± 0.0001 0.0032± 0.0002 0.0048± 0.00021T 0.0014± 0.0001 0.0024± 0.0002 0.0038± 0.00021Y 0.0019± 0.0001 0.0034± 0.0002 0.0059± 0.00032A 0.0017± 0.0001 0.0029± 0.0002 0.0048± 0.00022C 0.0018± 0.0001 0.0034± 0.0002 0.0060± 0.00032D 0.0026± 0.0002 0.0051± 0.0002 0.0087± 0.00032F 0.0014± 0.0001 0.0028± 0.0002 0.0046± 0.00022G 0.0014± 0.0001 0.0026± 0.0002 0.0043± 0.00022I 0.0021± 0.0001 0.0035± 0.0002 0.0057± 0.00022J 0.0025± 0.0002 0.0049± 0.0002 0.0079± 0.00032K 0.0011± 0.0001 0.0019± 0.0001 0.0032± 0.00022L 0.0015± 0.0001 0.0025± 0.0002 0.0048± 0.00022M 0.0010± 0.0001 0.0019± 0.0001 0.0028± 0.00022N 0.0010± 0.0001 0.0018± 0.0001 0.0029± 0.00022O 0.0019± 0.0001 0.0039± 0.0002 0.0066± 0.00032P 0.0010± 0.0001 0.0018± 0.0001 0.0029± 0.00022Q 0.0012± 0.0001 0.0020± 0.0001 0.0030± 0.00022R 0.0018± 0.0001 0.0033± 0.0002 0.0057± 0.00022S 0.0010± 0.0001 0.0018± 0.0001 0.0029± 0.00022T 0.0016± 0.0001 0.0028± 0.0002 0.0045± 0.00022W 0.0024± 0.0002 0.0046± 0.0002 0.0080± 0.00032Y 0.00090± 0.00010 0.0015± 0.0001 0.0025± 0.00023A 0.0010± 0.0001 0.0019± 0.0001 0.0030± 0.00023B 0.0026± 0.0002 0.0047± 0.0002 0.0077± 0.00033D 0.0018± 0.0001 0.0038± 0.0002 0.0072± 0.0003
21 Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 22
Table 5: (continued)
Enroller FNMR @ FMR=0.01 FNMR @ FMR=0.001 FNMR @ FMR=0.00013F 0.0017± 0.0001 0.0031± 0.0002 0.0058± 0.00023G 0.0010± 0.0001 0.0019± 0.0001 0.0031± 0.00023H 0.0018± 0.0001 0.0031± 0.0002 0.0052± 0.00023M 0.0012± 0.0001 0.0025± 0.0002 0.0047± 0.00023N 0.0021± 0.0002 0.0036± 0.0002 0.0057± 0.00023O 0.0016± 0.0001 0.0027± 0.0002 0.0040± 0.00023Q 0.0015± 0.0001 0.0029± 0.0002 0.0048± 0.00023S 0.0017± 0.0001 0.0031± 0.0002 0.0048± 0.00023T 0.00091± 0.00010 0.0015± 0.0001 0.0023± 0.00023V 0.0012± 0.0001 0.0025± 0.0002 0.0047± 0.00023W 0.0018± 0.0001 0.0033± 0.0002 0.0053± 0.00023Z 0.0012± 0.0001 0.0020± 0.0001 0.0034± 0.00024C 0.0012± 0.0001 0.0025± 0.0002 0.0047± 0.00024F 0.0017± 0.0001 0.0030± 0.0002 0.0056± 0.00024K 0.0014± 0.0001 0.0027± 0.0002 0.0048± 0.00024L 0.0022± 0.0002 0.0041± 0.0002 0.0076± 0.00034M 0.0014± 0.0001 0.0027± 0.0002 0.0048± 0.00024N 0.0018± 0.0001 0.0031± 0.0002 0.0046± 0.00024O 0.0012± 0.0001 0.0018± 0.0001 0.0029± 0.00024Q 0.0013± 0.0001 0.0023± 0.0002 0.0041± 0.00024S 0.0010± 0.0001 0.0017± 0.0001 0.0023± 0.00024T 0.0017± 0.0001 0.0030± 0.0002 0.0045± 0.00024U 0.0012± 0.0001 0.0022± 0.0002 0.0037± 0.00024W 0.0012± 0.0001 0.0024± 0.0002 0.0043± 0.00024X 0.0014± 0.0001 0.0026± 0.0002 0.0043± 0.00024Z 0.00091± 0.00010 0.0015± 0.0001 0.0025± 0.0002
22 Last Updated: October 9, 2015
3T Ongoing MINEX: Matcher Report Card 23
5 References[1] Jonathan N. Bradley, Christopher M. Brislawn, and Thomas Hopper. FBI wavelet/scalar quantization stan-
dard for gray-scale fingerprint image compression. In SPIE, Visual Information Processing II, 1961. 3
[2] Patrick Grother Elham Tabassi, George W. Quinn. When to fuse two biometrics. In IEEE Computer Society onComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Workshop on Multi-Biometrics, 2006. 3
[3] Robert Fontana, Giovanni Pistone, and Maria Rogantin. Cliassification of two-level factorial fractions. Jour-nal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 87:149–172, 2000. 3
[4] P. Grother, M. McCabe, C. Watson, M. Indovina, W. Salamon, P. Flanagan, E. Tabassi, E. Newton, and C. Wil-son. Performance and Interoperability of the INCITS 378 Fingerprint Template. Technical report, NIST, 2006.4
[5] A. Martin, G. Doddington, T. Kamm, M. Ordowski, and M. Przybocki. The DET curve in assessment ofdetection task performance. In Proc. Eurospeech, pages 1895–1898, 1997. 3
[6] George W. Quinn. Evaluation of latent fingerprint technologies: Fusion. In NIST Latent Fingerprint TestingWorkshop Recognition, Workshop, 2009. 3
23 Last Updated: October 9, 2015