On-Chart Success Dynamics of Popular Songs

Seungkyu Shin and Juyong ParkGraduate School of Culture Technology and BK21 Plus Postgraduate Programme for Content Science,

Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea 34141

In the modern era where highly-commodified cultural products compete heavily for mass consump-tion, finding the principles behind the complex process of how successful, “hit” products emergeremains a vital scientific goal that requires an interdisciplinary approach. Here we present a frame-work for tracing the cycle of prosperity-and-decline of a product to find insights into influential andpotent factors that determine its success. As a rapid, high-throughput indicator of the preferenceof the public, popularity charts have emerged as a useful information source for finding the marketperformance patterns of products over time, which we call the on-chart life trajectories that showhow the products enter the chart, fare inside it, and eventually exit from it. We propose quantitativeparameters to characterise a life trajectory, and analyse a large-scale data set of nearly 7 000 songsfrom Gaon Chart, a major weekly Korean Pop (K-Pop) chart that cover a span of six years. We findthat a significant role is played by non-musical extrinsic factors such as the established fan base ofthe artist and the might of production companies in the on-chart success of songs, strongly indicativeof the commodified nature of modern cultural products. We also review a possible mathematicalmodel of this phenomenon, and discuss several nontrivial yet intriguing trajectories that we call the“Late Bloomers” and the “Re-entrants” that appears to be strongly driven by serendipitous exposureon mass media and the changes of seasons.

I. INTRODUCTION

Competition for survival and success is a crucial me-chanism underlying the evolution of species or actors ina complex system, be it biological, social, or technologi-cal [1–3]. The increasing availability of large-scale dataalong with a remarkable progress in the theory and mo-deling of complex systems has led to the emergence of the“science of success” that aims to reveal common patternsin the success of people or products in such diverse sub-jects as viral spreading of content, performance of ath-letes in sports, popularity of emergent technologies, andimpact of scientific works [4–7].

The scientific study of success is also deeply relatedto the tradition of developing robust and effective ran-king methods for identifying the most successful and su-perior actors in a competition system [8–12]. Rankingsof products and commodities serve a useful purpose forcustomers looking to purchase, or firms planning to ad-vertise and market products. Cultural products such aspopular songs are no exception, especially in this day andage where digital communication technology has enabledmassive and efficient dissemination and consumption. Po-pularity charts have accordingly become more instanta-neously updated, emerging as an essential reference forcustomers trying to make decisions in the face of a floodof new content and information, therefore becoming a co-veted platform that affords products more exposure andprolonged success [13–16]. This brings up the hope thatwe may now be able to search for answers to many inter-esting questions into the underlying mechanisms of suc-cessful products, including “What are the features of ‘hit’products that can be learnt from their chart dynamics ?”,“What are the factors–intrinsic or extrinsic–behind thesuccess of products ?”, and so forth.

In this paper, as an attempt to answer these questions

using high-quality contemporary data and scientific me-thodology, we study the chart dynamics of K-Pop (Ko-rean pop) songs, i.e. how the songs fare on popularitycharts and what factors are behind it. K-Pop, a relati-vely recent international cultural sensation from SouthKorea, is characterised by catchy tunes and a heavy useof audiovisual elements. One of the early pinnacles ofits global success happened in July of 2012 with PSY’sGangnam Style that reached number two on the U.S.Billboard Hot 100. Its online success can be said to beeven more phenomenal, scoring nearly three billion viewson YouTube as of this writing (April 2017) to become themost-watched online video. Another prominent characte-ristic of K-Pop is the prominence of “idols”, young, highly-trained dancer-singers who are designed to be the hubaround which an entire industry of production and mer-chandise/service providers are organised [17]. This typeof intensive commercialisation places K-Pop at the fore-front of the contemporary music industry where the in-trinsic, musical properties of a song such as its melody orlyrics are relegated to being merely one factor that affectsits success [18–21]. Prompted by this sweeping trend, inthis paper we study a prominent K-Pop chart data tocharacterise the chart dynamics of successful songs, andthen determine the extent to which such extrinsic factorscorrelated with their successes.

II. POPULARITY CHARTS AND THE LIFETRAJECTORY OF A PRODUCT

A. Data, methodology, and life trajectory patterns

We analyze the data from Gaon MusicCharts (www.gaonchart.co.kr), a collection of weeklymusic charts serviced by the association of Korea’s

arX

iv:1

704.

0843

7v2

[ph

ysic

s.so

c-ph

] 1

5 M

ay 2

018

2

Number of Weeks on top 100

Young Girls(Bruno Mars, 10 weeks)

Let It Go(Idina Menzel, 16 weeks)

Gangnam Style(PSY, 24 weeks)

Party Rock Anthem(LMFAO, 33 weeks)

Neoui Uimi(Meaning of You,

IU, 73 weeks)

2

2

1000

100

10

2000

1 week 4 weeks 16 weeks 64 weeksmean=3.95median=21

Num

ber

of S

ongs

Figure 1. Histogram of the number of weeks spent by thesongs on the Gaon Digital Chart that exhibits a highly skewedbehavior. The mean is 3.95 and the median is 2 for the songsthat spend at least one week on the chart. The longest is forIU’s Neoui Uimi (The Meaning of You) at 73 weeks.

music industry. We focus on the Gaon Digital Chart, thesignature one similar in spirit to the U.S. Billboard Hot100. It ranks the top-100 songs (both domestic K-Popand foreign songs in a single chart) according to their di-gital sales figures including downloads, online streamingcounts, and their offline album sales, etc. (The exactweights given to each factor has not been made public,although the rankings themselves are open for anyone.)Our data covers all weeks between the second week of2010 (the actual beginning of Gaon) and the 53rd weekof 2015, for a total of 313 weeks. During this periodthere have been in total 7 560 songs that appeared atleast once on the chart. The actual numbers of weeksspent on the chart, however, vary widely as shown inFig. 1 : 36.4% of the songs (2 750) appeared for one weekonly, whereas 9.1% of the songs (689) stayed on thechart more than ten weeks. The longest life on the chartwas enjoyed by IU’s Neoui Uimi (The Meaning of You)for a record of the 73 weeks. The same artist’s JoeunNal (Good Day) and PSY’s Gangnam Style topped thechart at number one for the most weeks (5).

For most songs, the weekly rankings follow roughly asimilar pattern (notable exceptions are discussed later) :It appears in the chart, reaches its peak rank at somepoint, declines, and eventually leaves the chart. Upon ins-pection of numerous curves made by the songs’ rankings,we find it useful to characterise such life trajectory ofa song via the following parameters :

rinit Song’s inaugural rank on thechart [22]

rmax Peak ranktpre Time taken to reach the peak

since inaugural appearance onchart

tpost Time taken to exit from chartsince peak rank

Ker

nel D

ensi

ty

10 15 20 25 30 35 (Weeks)0 5

1

20

40

60

80

100

Four parameters of a song’s life trajectory Peak

Ran

k (P

opul

arity

)

r init

Time

(a)

(b) r init

Bandwidth = 4.816 Bandwidth = 3.794

Bandwidth = 0.1232 Bandwidth = 0.6161

( N=4810 )

Ker

nel D

ensi

ty

1 (Rank)204060801000.000

0.005

0.010

0.015

0.000

0.010

0.020

1 (Rank)20406080100

1.52.0

0.00.51.0

20 (Weeks)151050 60 (Weeks)40200

0.150.20

0.000.050.10

r ma

x

t pre t post

r max

t pre t post

Figure 2. (a) Four parameters that describe a song’s life tra-jectory on a chart : inaugural rank (rinit), peak rank (rmax),time spent on the chart before peak rank (tpre), and timespent on the chart after its peak (tpost). (b) The distributiondensity of the four parameters estimated using Kernel DensityEstimation (KDE) method. The rinit and rmax are weightedtowards high values, whereas tpre and tpost are weighted to-wards low values. Songs that appeared on the chart for twoweeks or more (4 810 songs in total, see definition of rinit inTable.) were anlayzed to generate these figures.

An example is shown in Fig. 2(a) for girlband EXI-D’s Wiarae (Up and Down). It first entered the chart atrinit = 7, reaching its peak (rmax = 1) tpre = 6 weekslater, then fell gradually (save for some brief rallies) fortpost = 30 weeks until it left the chart. In Fig. 2(b) weshow the probability density function of the four para-meters using Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) methodin the R statistical package [23, 24]. rinit and rmax areslightly skewed towards high values whereas tpre and tpostare more heavily skewed towards lower values, meaningthat an overwhelming majority of songs enjoy only briefstints on the chart. We can also define the overall successof a song to be the area under its trajectory curve so thatthe longer-surviving, higher-ranking songs can naturallybe called more successful.

The relationships between the parameters reveal moreinteresting patterns about the trajectories of the songs,presented in Fig. 3 and 4. In Fig. 3(a), the inauguralranks rinit are plotted along the x-axis, and the maxi-mum ranks rmax are plotted along the y-axis. The datapoints appear to be roughly evenly spread out here withthe exception of a high density of points along the diago-nal rinit = rmax, meaning that for many songs the inaugu-ral rank was indeed the peak. In Fig. 3(b), the time until

3

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

(a)

(b)

x=y

All ( > 1 week on chart)

0 5 10 15 20

05

1015

20

All ( > 1 week on chart)

806040200

8060

4020

0

20406080100 1

2040

6080

100

1

r init

r max

t pre

t post

Figure 3. The life trajectory parameters of the songs on thechart. (a) The inaugural rank is plotted along the x-axis, andthe peak rank is plotted along the y-axis. (b) The amountof time taken to reach the peak is plotted along the x-axis,and the amount of time taken to first go off the chart afterreaching the peak is plotted along the y-axis.

the peak tpre are plotted along the x-axis, and the timeuntil exiting the chart since the peak tpost are plottedalong the y-axis. Since most songs stay on the chart foronly a short period of time as shown in Fig. 1, they arelargely concentrated in the bottom left area. But overalltpost > tpre, meaning that for most songs the decay islonger than ascension.

In order to understand how these parameters are re-lated to the extrinsic properties of the songs, we uti-lize additional metadata of the artists and the genres.The artist metadata consists of three properties : Gen-der (Male, Female, or Mixed), Type (Solo, Group, orCollaboration), and Nationality (Domestic or Foreign).The genre metadata consists of five major classes–Ballad,Dance, Rap and Hiphop, R&B and Soul, and Rock–that each accounts for at least five percent of the songsin the entire data set. We use the analysis of variance(ANOVA) method to determine whether there exist sta-tistically significant differences between groups of songswith those extrinsic properties. We compare the variance

within groups and the variance between groups, then ifthe latter is significantly larger than the former, ANOVAlets us conclude that does exist a difference between thegroups [25]. The original ANOVA requires the popula-tion to be close to a normal distribution and populationvariances to be equal. For our kind of data that do notsatisfy those conditions we use the Kruskal-Wallis test,non-parametric version of ANOVA [26]. If the p-valuefrom the test is less than or equal to the significancelevel (0.05), we reject the null hypothesis and concludethat not all populations are equal. In Table I, we specifythe average trajectory parameters of all groups based onthe metadata and show the p-values from the Kruskal-Wallis test. The p-values shown in Table I tell us that inmost cases there exist statistically significant differences(p < 0.05) depending on the properties of the songs. It isnoteworthy that songs exhibit differences based on theirextrinsic properties. However, the significances are gene-rally weaker for the Gender classes, and particularly rmaxin regards to Gender (p = 0.31) and tpost in regards toNationality (p = 0.12) show insignificant differences. Thismeans that the artist’s Gender is not a strong factor ina song’s peak rank, and domestic (Korean) and foreignsongs do not differ in the time they take to exit the chart.

To further characterize the differences between groupsusing ANOVA, we conducted follow-up tests to see whe-ther certain extrinsic properties led to different chartdynamics. We see that “Male” and “Solo” artists showsignificantly lower values on all parameters in Table I.Therefore their songs enter the chart lower, reach lowerpeak ranks, and exit the chart quickly. Amongst differentgenres, Ballad, R&B and soul, and Rock do not showsignificant differences, while Dance and Hiphop genresare similar. Ballads are less successful than Dance andHiphop music, reflecting the current state of the dance-heavy K-Pop.

When we study the more successful, “hit” songs, dis-tinct patterns emerge. In Fig. 4(a) and (b) we show ana-logous plots for the 689 songs that stayed on the chartfor longer than ten weeks, accounting for 9.1% of thesongs in the full data set. In Fig. 4(a) we see that nowthe songs occupy the top right side, meaning that suc-cessful songs are likely to be already ranked high in itsearly phase, implying that a song’s potential for on-chartsuccess is realised at the very beginning, and appearingon the chart does not necessarily translate to opportu-nity for attaining a higher rank. The message is similarin Fig. 4(b) where tpre (x-axis) ranges merely betweenone and ten weeks (with the exception of Rock PartyAnthem by LMFAO which is not a K-Pop but a foreignsong, which we will discuss later in more detail) whiletpost on the y-axis assume much wider values with themaximum of 71 weeks. Consider PSY’s Gangnam Styleand IU’s Neoui Uimi in Fig. 4(c) A and B that do showtypical behaviors of K-Pop : Both take no to a very shorttime on the chart to reach their peaks.

We also find that foreign songs tend to show anoticeably different general behavior from that of K-

4

Table I. Average trajectory parameters, and results of Kruskal test for 4810 songs (>1 week on chart).

Variable Subgroup N rinit rmax tpre tpost Success p-value

GenderMalea 2738 58.09 71.42 0.43 4.02 288.54 All < 0.01**

but rmax : 0.31Femaleb 1684 60.74 72.41 0.48 4.38 320.90Mixedb 388 61.52 72.60 0.51 4.55 327.91

TypeSoloa 2509 57.13 70.17 0.43 3.78 273.08 All : 0.000***

but tpre : 0.0025**Groupb 1897 61.70 74.12 0.46 4.69 339.11Collabob 404 61.49 71.76 0.55 4.38 319.80

Nationality Domestic 4654 60.05 72.70 0.43 4.19 305.79 All : 0.000***but tpost : 0.12Foreign 156 36.88 46.74 0.96 4.03 221.19

Genre

Ballada 1637 58.51 72.08 0.38 3.74 274.76

All : 0.000***R&Ba 325 56.14 70.45 0.38 3.92 277.36Rocka 311 55.05 72.43 0.30 3.91 276.42Danceb 1039 65.39 76.62 0.47 5.19 380.97Hiphopb 653 61.05 70.95 0.48 4.31 308.15

Table II. Average trajectory parameters, and results of Kruskal test for 689 songs (>10 weeks on chart).

Variable Subgroup N rinit rmax tpre tpost Success p-value

GenderMale 361 91.63 94.43 0.88 13.93 934.56 All > 0.05

but rmax : 0.045*Female 259 93.32 95.35 0.88 13.41 953.95Mixed 69 93.48 96.57 0.86 14.41 972.33

TypeSolo 274 91.72 94.38 0.85 13.94 940.89

All > 0.05Group 346 92.95 95.44 0.86 13.50 940.58Collabo 69 92.86 95.19 1.09 14.58 989.81

Nationality Domestic 669 93.34 95.64 0.80 13.74 947.25 rinit, rmax, tpre : 0.000***tpost, Success > 0.05Foreign 20 62.65 73.45 3.60 15.45 891.60

Genre

Ballad 182 94.51 96.13 0.72 14.02 960.70

All > 0.05R&B 40 94.45 95.975 0.80 15.53 1070.18Rock 38 91.63 95.76 0.63 13.63 903.95Dance 217 93.77 95.75 0.76 13.30 947.16Hiphop 106 93.85 95.71 0.71 14.27 953.06

Pop. Take New Thang by Redfoo and Party Rock An-them by LMFAO, for instance, that are the outliers inFig. 4(a) and (b). New Thang entered the chart at rinit =83, rising in the chart quite slowly (see Fig. 4(c) C), pea-king at rmax = 65 and staying on the chart for a to-tal of 11 weeks. Party Rock Anthem, on the other hand,took tpre = 24 weeks to peak, but exited the chart intpost = 8 weeks. In fact, the other outliers in the plots ofFig. 4(a) and (b) tend to be foreign songs as well, takinga longer time to reach their peaks than K-Pop songs :Six out of eight songs below diagonal x + y = 100 inFig. 4(a) are foreign songs, and below y = x in Fig. 4(b)(meaning tpre > tpost), four out of the seven songs wereforeign although only 5.41% (260) of the songs analyzed(4 810) are foreign.

The Kruskal-Wallis test also reveals significant diffe-rences between domestic and foreign songs with the groupof 689 songs that stayed on the chart for more than tenweeks. The average trajectory parameters of these groupsand p-values from the Kruskal-Wallis tests are given inTable II. Here, unlike the entire group of songs, artistfeatures and genres do not show significant differences

(p > 0.05). However, domestic and foreign artist groupsexhibit significant differences regarding rinit, rmax, andtpre (p < 0.0001). Although the overall success are notsignificantly different, foreign songs have lower rinit andrmax, and take longer times to reach their peaks. Theseobservations regarding hit songs and their artist proper-ties imply that while non-musical extrinsic properties ofpopular songs do in general matter for songs’ on-chartbehaviors, their effects become weaker when successfulsongs are considered and the intrinsic, musical qualitiesof the songs become more important.

B. Chart dynamics of K-Pop vs foreign songs

We now take a deeper look at the differences betweenK-Pop and foreign songs. To do so we analyze two se-parate subcharts of Gaon, primarily due to the smallsample size of foreign songs in the original data : Of theN = 7 560 songs that ever appeared in the main Gaondigital chart, only three percent (260) are foreign. Thesubcharts we use here are the digital top-100 charts ex-

5

(a) (b)

201

5th 10th 15th 20th Week

A. Gangnam Style (PSY)

B. Neoui Uimi (Meaning of You, IU)

10th 30th 50th 70th Week

C. New Thang (Redfoo)

2nd 4th 6th 8th 10th Week

D. Party Rock Anthem (LMFAO)

10th 20th 30th Week

Peaks in the initial phases Peaks in the middle phases

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

New Thang(Redfoo)

Neoui Uimi(Meaning of You, IU)

Party Rock Anthem(LMFAO)

x=y

20406080100 1

406080

201

406080

100

60708090

50

75

85

95

65

All ( > 10 weeks on chart)

(c)

Gangnam Style(PSY)

806040200

2040

6080

100

1 8060

4020

0

All ( > 10 weeks on chart)

x=y

Neoui Uimi(Meaning of You, IU)

/ Gangnam Style(PSY)

r init

r max

t pre

t post

Figure 4. The life trajectory parameters of 689 successful songs (defined as longer than ten weeks on the chart). (a) The bulkof the songs are located on the top right, meaning that a majority of songs that appear on the chart are ranked high in theearly phases. (b) For most songs tpre ranges up to ten weeks while tpost is much more wide-ranging with a maximum of 71weeks.

clusively for K-Pop and foreign songs. This yields a muchlarger set of foreign songs for us to analyze : 7 602 for K-Pop (there is not much difference, since the main chartwas dominated by domestic songs to begin with), and3 855 for foreign songs. Again focusing on those that sur-vived for more than ten weeks on each chart (702 K-Popand 327 foreign songs), we find that the total life on thechart already show significant differences : K-Pop songssurvive on average 15.7 ± 0.4 weeks with maximum 73weeks by IU’s Neoui Uimi, while foreign songs survive37.3± 1.0 with a maximum of 235 weeks by Maroon 5’sMoves Like Jagger (Fig. 5(e) B).

Their life trajectories are plotted separately inFigs. 5(a) to (d). They again confirm that K-Pop songsreach their peaks early, with only 2.14% entering thechart under the 40th place, and the longest tpre is equalto ten, for Geu namjan marya (Because of You) by M.C

the Max. Foreign songs on the other hand, while fewerthan half the number of K-Pop in total, show a wider dis-tribution of the parameters in Fig. 4(c) and (d) : 18.7%entered the chart ranked 40th or lower, and 46 songs tookmore than ten weeks to reach their peaks, with maximumtpre = 220 by Adele’s Someone Like You that entered thechart at rinit = 98.

The question is, then, which factors are behind suchvisible differences between K-Pop and foreign songs. Onecould argue that it could be the music itself, if there reallyare intrinsic differences between K-Pop and foreign pop.Even if such differences from a musical standpoint didexist at all, however, they would be quite subtle, giventhat nearly all modern popular genres–rock and roll, bal-lads, synth pop, electronica, etc.–in foreign pop are alsowell represented in K-Pop. We therefore find it uncon-vincing that the musical differences would be the sole

6

(a)

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

20406080100 1

K-Pop ( > 10 weeks on chart)

2040

6080

100

1

(c)

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

20406080100 1

Foreign ( > 10 weeks on chart)

2040

6080

100

1

(b)

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0 5 10 15 20

05

1015

20

Geu Namjan marya(Because of You, M.C the Max)

806040200

8060

4020

0

(d)

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0 5 10 15 20

05

1015

20Someone Like You

(Adele)

200150100500

200

150

100

500

B. Moves Like Jagger (Maroon 5)

50th 100th 150th 200th Week

D. Someone Like You (Adele)

406080

201

406080100

20

50th 100th 150th 200th Week

60

80

20

40

10th 20th 30th Week

C. Geu Namjan marya (M.C the Max)

Peaks in the initial phases Peaks in the middle phases

Fore

ign

Dom

estic

(e)

Neoui Uimi(Meaning of You, IU)

Moves Like Jaggar(Maroon 5)

r init

r max

t pre

t post

r init

r max

t pre

t post

A. Neoui Uimi (Meaning of You, IU)

10th 30th 50th 70th Week

201

406080

100

Figure 5. The analoguous scatter plots for K-Pop (domestic) songs (red) and foreign songs (blue). Foreign songs are compa-ratively more spread out, probably due to less influence of extrinsic factors.

7

determinant of the differences in the chart dynamics ofsongs. If not the intrinsic properties, then some externalfactors may be in play here. While there could be many,here we study two that are widely believed to be definingcharacteristics of contemporary K-Pop, the artists andthe machinery of production companies.

III. ARTISTS, PRODUCTION COMPANIES OFK-POP

The observed fact that most songs reach their peaks inthe very early phases of their lives does seem unnaturaland counterintuitive–this means that the songs have al-ready realised potential for success during the one shortweek before entering the chart or, even more bizzare, be-fore its release. We believe that the clues to the origin ofsuch behavior comes from a dominant recent trend in hownew K-Pop songs are produced and marketed : Produc-tion companies are increasingly focusing on pre-releasemarketing to rally the fandom that prop up online strea-ming counts and downloads in the very early stages ofthe song’s release [17]. This happens in tandem with theactions of the fan base of the artist who are not passiveconsumers in music industry but active disseminators ofthe songs to the general public outside the fan base. Thismeans that production companies in K-Pop–influentialentities that recruit, train, finance, manage, and marketartist–and huge fan bases that reflect the artists’ priorsuccess and reputation may hold significant sway over thechart success of new songs [27, 28], possibly even morethan their qualities may. Artists and producers of foreignpop songs, on the other hand, generally do not main-tain such a strong presence in Korea which explains theirmore natural dynamics on the charts (Fig. 4(e) and (f)).

We now investigate the influence of artists and pro-duction companies on a song’s chart dynamics. We startby defining a quantity that represents the influence ofan artist and a production company. Possible candidatescould include the size of the fan base, the company’s salesvolume, stock price, and number of affiliated artists incompanies. But here we focus on chart performance asthe measure of an artist and a company’s influence. Inother words, we posit that a history of chart success isan indicator of the entity’s influence and future success.This is inspired by the so-called “Matthew effect”, therich-get-richer phenomena often observed in social sys-tems [29]. We define the Chart Success Index Si of anartist and a company i as the sum total of the weeklyranks of all songs produced by the subject in the historyof Gaon Digital Chart, i.e.

Si ≡∑

w∈All Weekss∈Ωw

i

(101− rws

), (1)

where Ωwi = s refers to all songs from artist or companyi ranked on the chart on week w, and rws refers to theweekly rank of the song.

First, Fig. 6(a) shows the S values of the ten mostsuccessful artists by the last week in our data set. Mostartists display a pattern of alternating rises and plateausin the growth of S, the plateaus meaning the time bet-ween successive songs. While it is the band that generallyoccupy the top positions, IU is a notable exception. Se-cond, Fig. 6(b) shows the S values of the top ten produc-tion companies. Most companies display linear growthpatterns unlike their artist, with YG, SM, and Loen En-tertainment corporations being the major three as of thelast week in our data. To view the relationship between anentity’s influence and the life trajectory of the songs theyrelease, we compute the correlation between final valueof S and the four curve parameters plus overall success ofeach song (the area under its trajectory curve). The er-rors are estimated using the jackknife method [30, 31].Here we note that we consider the life trajectories ofsongs from debuting artists, since unknowns in the mar-ket their production companies’ abilities and clout wouldbe the only major external, non-musical factor behindtheir chart performance. Of the 934 production compa-nies that produced at least one new artist on the chart,514 produced only one. To eliminate similar errors ori-ginating from such small players, we consider 193 artists(out of 1 680) that put more than ten songs, and the 55companies that put nine or more debuting artists on thechart. The results are shown in Fig. 6(c) and (d).

All parameters but the pre-peak time (tpre) showstrong positive correlations with S. This means thatbeing a renowned artist or having powerful productioncompany behind one’s back is highly correlated with ge-neral chart success (i.e. long duration on chart and highpeak rank), but regardless of the prior reputation or com-pany’s influence the artist hits their peak early. To a skep-tical eye, this phenomenon may be a reason for doubtingthe role of the “quality” of a K-Pop song in its chartperformance ; since early peaking (short tpre) is universalwhile rmax is positively correlated with S, rmax could bedue simply to the marketing and the established fan baseof a company–because it suggests that a K-Pop song’ssuccess was somewhat determined even before its release,before it had a chance to be introduced to the largerconsumer base–and tpost would also be a straightforwardconsequence of that (the higher the rank, the more timeit takes to leave the chart). It should be noted, however,that this is not a complete picture, and there is still evi-dence that quality and musical properties do matter in asong’s chart success. Ironically, one could make the pointfrom the dynamics of foreign songs in the Korean mar-ket that lack such a level of support and marketing fromproduction companies : Foreign songs are slow to gainpopularity, but they tend to have more staying power. Itmay be an unsatisfactory state of affairs for the businessthat the effect of marketing may eclipse the importanceof musical quality for K-Pop, and it remains to be seenhow much role quality plays in the long run [32–34].

8

(c) (d)

100 150 200 250 3000

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000 YG EntertainmentSM EntertainmentLoen EntertainmentCube EntertainmentJYP EntertainmentStarship EntertainmentAmoeba CultureCore EntertainmentFNC EntertainmentPlan A Entertainment

Week

Cha

rt S

ucce

ss In

dex

YG

SM

Loen

0 50100 150 200 250 3000

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

35000 IUBusker BuskerBig BangDavichi2NE1BeastSNSDSistarT-araHuh Gak

Week

Cha

rt S

ucce

ss In

dex

(a) (b)

IU

0 50

30000

Big Bang

Pearson Correlation CoefficientSpearman Correlation Coefficient

r init

r max

t pre

tpost

Success(of a song)

r init

r max

t pre

tpost

Success(of a song)

Busker Busker

−0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 −0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Artists Production Companies

Pearson Correlation CoefficientSpearman Correlation Coefficient

Figure 6. (a)–(b) The growth of chart success index S of top 10 artists and production companies. (c)–(d) Correlation betweenthe chart success index and average life trajectory parameters of song released by the artists and the production companies.The errors are estimated using the jackknife method [30]. All parameters except tpre are positively correlated.

IV. ENDOGENOUS VERSUS EXOGENOUSPEAKS

Our analyses on the the impact of extrinsic propertiesseparate from the intrinsic ones of popular songs are inline with earlier studies on the two types of dynamicalfeatures in complex networks : exogeneity and endoge-neity [35–37] that are believed to cause critical peaks.Exogenous peaks occur in response to external kicks,while endogenous peaks are spontaneous internal fluctua-tion formalized by the theory of self-organized criticality.It is therefore well understood that it is important todistinguish between exogeneity and endogeneity to mea-sure their respective effects to ultimately understand thefundamental dynamics underneath a system. In parti-cular, Sornette et al. [38] introduced a model of epide-mic propagation which specifies that exogenous peaks oc-cur abruptly and are followed by a power-law relaxationwhile endogenous peaks are characterized by approxima-tely symmetrical power law growth and relaxation. Ac-cording to the model, the endogenous peaks ascend and

descend slowly proportional to 1/|t− tc|1−2θ where t = 0corresponds to the peak maximum and tc is an additionalpositive parameter. On the other hand, the relaxation ofexogenous peaks behave like 1/(t − tc)1−θ which decaysmuch faster than endogenous peaks. Sornette also foundan average value of the exponent θ ∼ 0.3 ± 0.1. Howe-ver, Lambiotte [39] observed that the relaxation processcan be as well seen as an exponential one that saturatestoward an asymptotic state when focusing on the short-time scale after a sales maximum (∼ 1 month). He sugges-ted a thermodynamic model to represent the decays witha relaxation coefficient λ which is inversely proportionalto the relaxation time, and found that the initial decayof exogenous and endogenous peaks occurs on differenttime ranges : < λ >exo∼ 2 < λ >endo= 0.14.

We apply these models to our data, limited to the 689songs that stayed on the chart more than ten weeks forsufficient data points. First, we transform a time series ofthe rank R of a song into a time series of instantaneoussales flux through the relation S = R−γ , γ = 0.5 follo-wing Sornette et al.’s approach. We fit the relaxation of

9

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70th Week

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35h Week

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5Power Law Fit

Exponenetial Fit

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

Sale

s ( R

)

- 0.5

Mea

n Sq

uare

Dev

iatio

n

Neoui Uimi (Meaning of You, IU)

t (rank ordered) post

Power Law FitExponenetial Fit

(a)

(b)

Figure 7. (a) Power-law (blue) and exponential (red) fitsto IU’s Neoui Uimi, the longest-surviving song on the chart.The power law-fit appears better matched. (b) The change ofroot-mean-square deviation along the relaxation time, tpost.At smaller tpost, the exponential fit (red) shows similar orbetter results than the power-law fit (blue), but the power-law fit shows smaller residual errors at large tpost.

life trajectories with power-law and exponential modelsrespectively, and measure the root mean square deviationin order to quantify the goodness of fit. Lower values ofthe deviation imply a better fit. Fig. 7 (a) shows thepower-law and exponential fits of the song Neoui Uimi,the longest-ranked on the chart, and Fig. 7 (b) showsthe changes in the root-mean-square deviation along therelaxation time, tpost. At smaller tpost (< 5 weeks), theexponential fit (red) showed similar or better results thanthe power-law fit (blue), but the power law seems to havelower residual errors at large tpost, implying that the re-laxation process behave exponentially at the shorter timescale.

In addition, we extract endogenous and exogenouspeaks inferred from their initial acceleration defined asr−0.5max −r

−0.5init

tprehere based on the assumption that exogenous

peaks occur abruptly while endogenous peaks are formedrelatively slowly. 30 high-ranked and low-ranked peaksare respectively classified as exogenous and endogenous.Meanwhile, as most songs (607 out of 689 songs) reachtheir peaks immediately as they are released, the initialacceleration is not defined (rmax − rinit = 0, tpre = 0), sowe classify them as a separate “Early Peaker” group to

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.0

EndogenousExogenous

Early Peaker

Endogenous, 1 - 2θ = 0.271Exogenous, 1 - θ = 0.655Early Peaker, 1 - θ = 0.669

0 2 4 8 16 (Weeks)

20

Relaxation Coefficient

Cum

ulat

ed P

roba

bilit

ySa

les (

R

)- 0

.5

2-2

2-2

2-2

2-2

(a)

(b)

Figure 8. (a) Relaxation of sales after peaks obtained byaveraging over songs in each class classified according to theprecursory acceleration. (b) The cumulated histograms of re-laxation coefficient λ for three classes : endogenous (blue),exogenous (red), and early peaks (black). The vertical linespoint to the average values 0.076 (endogenous), 0.178 (exo-genous) and 0.181 (early peaks). The exogenous and endo-genous classes are markedly distinguishable, and early peakgroup shows a similar behavior to exogenous peaks.

observe whether they show behaviors similar to those ofendogenous or exogenous peaks. Fig. 8 (a) shows relaxa-tion of sales after peaks obtained by averaging over songsin each class, and Fig. 8(b) present the cumulated proba-bility of the relaxation coefficient λ in the three classes.Both figures clearly indicate difference between endoge-nous and exogenous peaks being separated significantly.The power law exponents in Fig. 8 (a) also approxima-tely obey Sornette et al.’s prediction, 1 − θ, and 1 − 2θ.In addition, the average relaxation coefficient of exoge-nous peaks (0.178) is over twice that of endogenous peaks(0.076), implying that the relaxation time is significantlyshorter in exogenous shocks. Interestingly, the early pea-ker songs without any precursory pattern also show asimilar behavior to exogenous peaks in both the power

10

law exponent and relaxation coefficients, leading us toinfer that their early peaks can indeed be attributed toexternal forces rather than spontaneous fluctuations.

V. DISCUSSIONS

In this paper we have studied the life trajectories of K-Pop and foreign songs on Korea’s Gaon Charts. We haveshown that a large majority of life trajectories could berepresented with four parameters of their peak rankingsand duration on the charts. Many songs, especially K-Pop, were found to attain their peaks in the early phases,which indicated the influence of non-musical external fac-tors such as the power of artists and production compa-nies.

We have demonstrated the possibility of utilizing po-pularity data to describe how the state of an industryaffects the success of products, and we believe that theapplication is not necessarily limited to popular songs.We have explored only a small range of possibilities, andwe hope to see our methods applied to more systems ina wider gamut of products and markets.

We now conclude this paper by introducing two classesof songs that do not follow the general trends of Fig. 4but could still be interesting. The first class is “Late Bloo-mers” that take an relatively long time since debut toclimb up the chart. This would be a very rare feat indeed :Only 1.5% of the songs (112 in total) manage to climb inrankings for three straight weeks. A good example is Wi-arae (Up and Down) by EXID : having failed to make itto Gaon upon release, it went viral on other social net-working sites before taking the 1st place several weekslater, as shown in Fig. 9(a). Another example is Resetby Korean-American rapper Tiger JK. The song was in-tended as a soundtrack to a TV drama whose popularitypushed up the song on to the charts, and its peak in themiddle of its trajectory matches with the ratings peak forthe TV show, see Fig. 9(b). The second class of extraor-dinary patterns is “Re-entrants”, referring to the songsthat return to the chart after falling from it the firsttime (we consider a song’s life trajectory on the charthas come to an end when it exits the chart and does notreturn within five weeks.). A very small percentage of thesongs (1.5%, or 116 songs) are such cases, and an evensmaller number (39) stay on the chart for longer thanfive weeks after re-entry. A detailed review of the forcesbehind such behavior tells us that there are broadly twokinds : The first is renewed media exposure and broadcas-ting. Particularly, getting featured on audition programssuch as K-Pop Star (Korean version of American Idol) orgame shows centered on songs is a common way by whichan old song experiences a surge of interest. Gaseum Si-rin Iyagi (Words That Freeze My Heart) by Wheesung(Fig. 9(c)) and Yanghwa daegyo (Yanghwa Bridge) byZion.T in Fig. 9(d) are famous examples helped by themass media, sometime gaining even more popularity af-ter re-entry than upon its release. The second is seasonal

80604020

1

100

Ran

k

Jan2010

Jun2010

Jan2011

Jun2011

Jan2012

Jun2012

Jan2013

Jun2013

Jan2014

Jun2014

Jan2015

Jun2015

Jan2016

Wiarae (Up and Down)

Jan2010

Jun2010

Jan2011

Jun2011

Jan2012

Jun2012

Jan2013

Jun2013

Jan2014

Jun2014

Jan2015

Jun2015

Jan2016

Reset

Jan2010

Jun2010

Jan2011

Jun2011

Jan2012

Jun2012

Jan2013

Jun2013

Jan2014

Jun2014

Jan2015

Jun2015

Jan2016

Gaseum sirin iyagi (Words That Freeze My Heart)

Jan2010

Jun2010

Jan2011

Jun2011

Jan2012

Jun2012

Jan2013

Jun2013

Jan2014

Jun2014

Jan2015

Jun2015

Jan2016

Yanghwa daegyo (Yanghwa Bridge)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

80604020

1

100

80604020

1

100

80604020

1

100

Release

Ran

kR

ank

Ran

k

Jan2010

Jun2010

Jan2011

Jun2011

Jan2012

Jun2012

Jan2013

Jun2013

Jan2014

Jun2014

Jan2015

Jun2015

Jan2016

All I Want For Christmas Is You

80604020

1

100

Ran

k

Jan2010

Jun2010

Jan2011

Jun2011

Jan2012

Jun2012

Jan2013

Jun2013

Jan2014

Jun2014

Jan2015

Jun2015

Jan2016

Beotkkoch ending (Cherry Blossom Ending)

80604020

1

100

Ran

k

Figure 9. Two types of notable outlier types observed inchart dynamics. (a)–(b) The first type are “Late Bloomers,”referring to songs that climb up the chart or peak noticeablylater than their market releases, often due to belated mediaexposure. (c)–(f) The second type are “Re-entrants,” refer-ring to the songs that re-enter a chart after leaving it. Mediaexposure and seasonal changes are the main factors.

effect, which is very straightforward : Christmas carolssuch as All I Want For Christmas Is You by MariahCarey (Fig. 9(e)) is a good example. The K-Pop songBeotkkoch Ending (Cherry Blossoms Ending) by BuskerBusker, popular upon its release, is an example that be-came a spring carol of sorts that re-enters the chart everyspring in Korea, as seen in Fig. 9(f). To conclude, therewere evidence that, absent powerful production compa-nies, quality and other factors such as media exposurecould lead to chart success resulting in extraordinary lifetrajectories such as the late bloomers and the re-entrants.

11

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the BK21 Plus Post-graduate Organisation for Content Science, IITP grant

funded by the Korean government (MSIP-R0115-16-1006), and National Research Foundation of Ko-rea (NRF-20100004910, NRF-2016S1A2A2911945, andNRF-2016S1A3A2925033).

[1] C Darwin, On the Origin of Species (Arcturus, London,2013).

[2] B. Drossel, “Biological evolution and statistical physics,”Adv. Phys. 50, 209–295 (2001).

[3] S. A. Kauffman, The origins of order : Self-organizationand selection in evolution (Oxford University Press, Ox-ford, 1993).

[4] P. Cintia, S. Rinzivillo, and L. Pappalardo, “A network-based approach to evaluate the performance of footballteams,” in Proc. Machine Learning and Data Mining forSports Analytics Workshop (Porto, Portugal, 2015).

[5] T. Garber, J. Goldenberg, B. Libai, and E. Muller, “Fromdensity to destiny : Using spatial dimension of sales datafor early prediction of new product success,” Market. Sci.23, 419–428 (2004).

[6] C. Griwodz, M. Bär, and L. C. Wolf, “Long-term mo-vie popularity models in video-on-demand systems : orthe life of an on-demand movie,” in Proc. ACM Int.conference on Multimedia (ACMMM1997) (ACM, Seat-tle, USA, 1997) pp. 349–357.

[7] R. Sinatra, D. Wang, P. Deville, C. Song, and A. L. Ba-rabási, “Quantifying the evolution of individual scientificimpact,” Science 354, aaf5239 (2016).

[8] M. L. Balinski and R. Laraki, Majority judgment : mea-suring, ranking, and electing (MIT Press, Cambridge,2010).

[9] J. Park and M. E. J. Newman, “A network-based rankingsystem for us college football,” J. Stat. Mech. , P10014(2005).

[10] D. S. Price, “A general theory of bibliometric and othercumulative advantage processes,” J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.27, 292–306 (1976).

[11] S. Shin, S. E. Ahnert, and J. Park, “Ranking competi-tors using degree-neutralized random walks,” PloS one 9,e113685 (2014).

[12] R. J. Williams and N. D. Martinez, “Simple rules yieldcomplex food webs,” Nature 404, 180–183 (2000).

[13] A. E. Burke, “The dynamics of product differentiation inthe british record industry,” J. Cult. Econ. 20, 145–164(1996).

[14] R. D. Dixon, “Lp chart careers : Indices and predictorsof ascent and descent in popularity,” Pop. Music. Soc. 8,19–43 (1982).

[15] P. Hesbacher, R. Downing, and D. G. Berger, “Soundrecording popularity charts : A useful tool for music re-search : I. why and how they are compiled,” Pop. Music.Soc. 4, 3–18 (1975).

[16] E. A Strobl and C. Tucker, “The dynamics of chart suc-cess in the uk pre-recorded popular music industry,” J.Cult. Econ. 24, 113–134 (2000).

[17] K. Howard, Y. Lee, H. Finchum-Sung, R. Maliangkay,O. Hwang, G. L. Pak, M. Son, H. A. Willoughby, E. Jung,and M. Crieghton, Korean pop music : Riding the wave(Global Oriental, Folkestone, 2006).

[18] T. W. Adorno, “On popular music,” Stud. Philos. Soc.Sci. 9, 17 (1941).

[19] A. Hennion, “The production of success : an anti-musicology of the pop song,” Pop. Music. 3, 159–193(1983).

[20] P. D. Lopes, “Innovation and diversity in the popularmusic industry, 1969 to 1990,” Am. Sociol. Rev. , 56–71(1992).

[21] Keith Negus, “Where the mystical meets the market :creativity and commerce in the production of popularmusic,” Soc. Rev. 43, 316–341 (1995).

[22] Since Gaon Digital Chart compiles weekly data startingon Sundays, the first visible rank of a songs can be si-gnificantly affected by at which point during the week itis released : A song released on a Monday, for instance,would have more time to accumulate stats (downloadsand streaming counts) than another one released closerto a Sunday. To alleviate this problem, we actually use asong’s second week rank as its inaugural rank rinit, redu-cing the number of songs analyzed to 4 810.

[23] David W Scott, Multivariate density estimation : theory,practice, and visualization (John Wiley & Sons, 2015).

[24] Simon J Sheather and Michael C Jones, “A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density es-timation,” J. R. Stat. Soc. Series. B. , 683–690 (1991).

[25] R. V. Hogg and A. T. Craig, Introduction to mathemati-cal statistics (Upper Saddle River, New Jersey : PrenticeHall, 1995).

[26] S. Siegal, Nonparametric statistics for the behavioralsciences (McGraw-hill, 1956).

[27] R. A. Peterson and D. G. Berger, “Entrepreneurship inorganizations : Evidence from the popular music indus-try,” Admin. Sci. Q. , 97–106 (1971).

[28] R. A. Peterson and D. G. Berger, “Cycles in symbol pro-duction : The case of popular music,” Am. Sociol. Rev. ,158–173 (1975).

[29] R. K. Merton, “The matthew effect in science,” Science159, 56–63 (1968).

[30] M. E. J. Newman and G. T. Barkema, Monte Carlo me-thods in statistical physics (Oxford University Press, NewYork, 1999).

[31] B. Efron, “Computers and the theory of statistics : thin-king the unthinkable,” SIAM Rev 21, 460–480 (1979).

[32] D. H. Henard and C. L. Rossetti, “All you need is love ?”J. Advert. Res. 54, 178–191 (2014).

[33] M. Mauch, R. M. MacCallum, M. Levy, and A. M. Leroi,“The evolution of popular music : Usa 1960–2010,” R.Soc. Open. Sci. 2, 150081 (2015).

[34] Y. Ni, R. Santos-Rodriguez, M. Mcvicar, and T. De Bie,“Hit song science once again a science,” in Proc. Int.Workshop on MML 11 (Citeseer, Spain, 2011).

[35] Ryogo Kubo, “Statistical-mechanical theory of irrever-sible processes,” J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 12, 570–586 (1957).

[36] Sergio Albeverio, Volker Jentsch, and Holger Kantz, Ex-treme events in nature and society (Springer, 2006).

12

[37] Janusz A Hołyst, Krzysztof Kacperski, and FrankSchweitzer, “Phase transitions in social impact modelsof opinion formation,” Physica A 285, 199–210 (2000).

[38] Didier Sornette, Fabrice Deschâtres, Thomas Gilbert,and Yann Ageon, “Endogenous versus exogenous shocksin complex networks : An empirical test using book sale

rankings,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 228701 (2004).[39] R. Lambiotte and M. Ausloos, “Endo-vs. exogenous

shocks and relaxation rates in book and music âĂIJsale-sâĂİ,” Physica A 362, 485–494 (2006).