.i__ - _-=

- - -- -. . . - . . .- .-* - -

20 2;"'f ATTACHMENT F

"'

. j ', ,rtwe Rav.isaon 19 -.

i. . . .

l(Page 1 of 2) Apri1 7, 14R?*?n

10CFR50.59 FORMAT FOR SAFETY EVALUATION^

STATION [A htLG boa UNIT //2SYSTEM Pverc-se 9/Gr ATrod TEST / PROCEDURE No [7P1240-4

TEST / PROCEDURE TITLE AN REVISION I'- ,

EqulPMENT NAME 12AR 4an es wd Anu Ice k l J

- - - - - . . - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _

.

- ..

LAP-820-2... -.* :. - -- Rev.ision jo.. . -..- ..... ...-- . s_

_ _ . ._s_ __#PPII 7 1982, ..

' . , ..

ATTACHMENT F 21 final.' .-. .o- - (Page 2 of 2)' *

,

-m .SAFETY EVALUATION CHECKLIST (to cyg 3c,33).;-) ;* ,.

- TEST / PROCEDURE No. L tP I2co-4REV|5 ION r

e-

-

t --

Does this cons:Itu:e a change to preceduresas described in Safety Analysis Report?

-, ,

' -.!c ( M I'- . (2: ( ) !I-

,--' i;s a :.anga in **c "ac.31021 5:eC1 fica:1Cn.favcivec?

.s _ . ,.I

.-

'so( ) r .. .. . . .-,__

:P '5:',Ansner .ne felicwing cuestiens diu a 'y".:'SAfri / E7AL"ATICM:and ;::vids,s:ecific reas ns justifying :te tscisien:, . .

'Is :ne :r:bability of an ec: r snes. :ne ::nsecuence cf inC !. . as .rtvi:::17:ac:ican:, er m1 fun :1:n cf saft:y rels:ac ecut:: tat,'' increase?evatus:ad in the Final Safety analysis Ke:cet, .

Jes A No ,n

{": sa,rhp a , , dai- gc A-

'

Or maifuncti:n Of a diffr:n:.r['" 2.

Is :ne possibill:y f:r an accidan:ty:e man any Ortvicu:1y evalua ad in its Fina! Saft y ;

ly:i1^

1 Re:er c tatad?Yes X_ No .

T w & & O. A a. YG, LYY&

of saft:y, as ,.efined in the basis f:r any ~c:--i :13.. is :te :::aritC Scecification, rtducad? Yes A.lic ...) fddk k C' g.

-

p Any An!ser * Yes ( ) I AII An5*.eerT NC (k' -

, .. .

Recut inO t ? i'3-2 *!uci tar'E270 i 2 :Ory "J.Tr:r..$.51 :n'

100:0r7 21 * 17 ?;r Or!.702. ..

t .I f '

l ra n: :.:::n Eec2ivec ( ) |

-'

| u, ,L-

Int ".iata 7"00 wdct/TesD 3I*C15t.ati:nC **{ Q7"- :

-.

[N /%.ra. 80 ..ee ee o 3er':- ned bysneuid :e rt: rne i.. ::a--- :ne.uli rt: r, :: -: ';EC. f'jCata 12 do h,'

p-

| d

.

e

e

._

-

. '.7 - 2 _n, , , , . _ _ - - - _ - --- . _ _ _ _ . _ . .

k -LAi).82072; I; .. ..

ATTACHMENT F Revision 19 ]{* *'' ' - )?' * * --*(Page 1 of 2} April. 7,'19A?* ~t .

i -2n-

10CFR50.39 FORMAT FCR SAFETY EVALUATION

STATION bd UNIT OSYSTEM FfRS$ TEST / PROCEDURE No LN 8 330- 41

pensemmon er itm4,. roe da.w

.-;~.... - -w ..~!)y a

.

*- ; . - . :- .#'

. . ~ . , , ..Lpp.;910 2. '.

. ._

' ' j .1 '

_'- . . _

Rev.i s opn _ ; c..

.;. .: . :. . - . . . ..- _-__ -April 7, 1982

..

.. .. . .ATTACHMENT F 21 finaf*-

. ,

.. . . ,.(Page 2 of 2) -* -*

*

mSAFETY EVALUATION CHECKLIST (10 CFR 50.53)

.

.;.) g* TEST / PROCEDURE No. / ?//3 70->/,. ,

REVISION M--

n..

p.

.

Does this conselcute a change to procedures._as described in Safety Analysis Report?

, ,

.| ti (c: ( ) .le M I .

'~~~

m ;s 1 .nanga in == "tennt:.1 I ectficac1:n'plinvolvec7.i . . , .

.| 'to tsA ,. _ . . . . . . ..*~:',-- Answr the felicwing cues:1cns d12 1 *y'::' :r.

SAFTr/ DALUAl'ICil:and pr:vids,s:ecific reascns justi*ying :Me decisien:

.

..

'Cs the :r:bability of (n, cecur sncs. es nsecuence of in

.

accicane, er .nalfunccien of saf t:y rtla:ad acut::snc, as ;rrit:::!yt.| , facrtsse?'| evalua:ad in Me Final Safaty analysis Re:crt, .

No , M M 0.% */ NW_YesE .& 'W '

I:Is de ;cssibill:y fer- an accicant cc .caifuncti:n :( t it!far:rty:e can any ;rtvicusly evalua: in :te Fina! Saft:7 4 lysis[ 2. tic, J @

. _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _.

+ . . . , , . . -,. . . , . _._ - g F% ~ , . 2,2 .. . - .. . . ,

. _ ._ _;a ;_ . . .

I ' AmCMENT F' , . 9' ,R I on,, ,'

{fage i of 21 Apri l 7, 19 A?.-

10CFR50.59 FORMAT FOR SAFETY EVALUATION

STATION (d UNIT hSYSTEM N TEST / PROCEDURE No C P/7 / 730 -d 3TEST / PROCEDURE TITLE hbdD , +) 0 AT'

EVISIONi ..~ 'EqulPMENT NAME

.

EQUIPMENT NUMBER~

__.___ ____.-- . _ . .

__

OESCRIPTION OF TEST / PROCEDURE' -

Mh M bra [U.Ad( H,' QAk/b MfO_ M CO C

.

.

SAFdTY EVALIJATION: Answer ths following questions with a "yes' er "no", and gide- sps=ifief-

masons Justifying the decisiom .

Is the pecbability ci en occurrence or the corcequence of en cecident, or malfunctica of.;

1.'%gaipment importent to seis es previously ownluated in ths .8inci Safety Anclysis Racert

-

, ,YesNo, Because: . g%~

u %, .4 Q .g gIAA7

.

'

Is the possi'aility fer en accident or malfunction of a different type then any previously2. Yes V No, Bec=use: ;evolucted in the Finci Scisty Anclysis Report enet d7'

A/# f||t

3. Is the mergin er ty, es defined in the basis f=r =ny Technic =1 Specific =rien, redue:d?Yes No, Secause: Gla. kp pdm

!

i

'

Any answer checked "YES" should be reported in the Annual Recor:.|* Note:

:o the NRC|

i

!

N

bed 0rfned dhpg

$hA .ss.b|h- Approwd ty y-

. _ . . . _ . . . _ . . _ _ . _

. .. . ::.. : - _ . . a .:. . --. u - w.- .. a .

. ... ~

. ~ . LAP-320,-2, ~~... .

e .'* Revisicn 39. . -

. _4-_. *.-

__ . _ . - . . .,, _._

A0ril 7. 1982* .> . .- . . ATTACHMENT F 21 finaf**..

. **. . . .

(Page 2 of 2) .' * -*

*

SAFETY EVALUATION CHECKLIST (10 CFR 50.59)- .

.;-)* * *

, ; TEST / PROCEDURE No. 2 M/f 'to -EJ,.

REVISION 'y. An

-

-y' .*

m Coes this constitute a change to preceduresas described in Safety Analysis Report?

, ,

.>s ,.!c 9 9 !', , I I:: ( )

,P 1 ;s a =anga in == acnnte:1 Dec1 fica:icn- .

.i.. , iinya1sec7 ...f fo ()4 T _ . . . . . . . .- -

Answer the fellcwing cuestiens with a 'ye:' r ' :" .r-. .gSAFITI DAL' ATIC:l:J ;and ;r:vids,s;ecific reascns justifying :he itcf sf en: !

L.,

'Is ce :r:bability of an ec: r sces. -he c=nsecuence of 2nC !. .' is ;rsvi:::17ac:Manc, er =alfune.ii:n' of saf t:7 rils:se aquf:= tnt.''avalustad in the Final Safety analysis Xe:ce., incrisse?

'.

Yes N' No , g 3.e M bF' t /f

% o.b : [ tka CO u.f~~. .

Is :he :essibill:y fer in ac:1 dent er maifune:4n :( a dif far:n:Ttype than any Ortvicusly evalua:ad in =a Final Saft:y

:ty f s[ 2..gY

'

/^Reccri crtstad? Yts '>o Ho , (% iO O/w -*d j,!! the ari n of saft y, as defined in :he basis f:r any ~ee-i::I _t i 'g

/71..

Scecificatica, reducad? Yes W No,I] . 4,Q:4 m.

y -,_ All Ans*.etrs 30 b,-

p _ Any An!ser * Its ( ) e.. .

l Recut::: 13 : P! 3!'ic W0 lear"P

'

:ey.:! 2::: / C.:::m.is 1 cn.' - - ~zu=:-~ n-' = ?nt

.

\ -

| 1-;U C M :*.*.i~n rec 2i'#ed ( ) || (-

,I ,L.'

Int:11ta Frt: w urt/Tese[03Itren02:103b '*lOTI:

{ [//

i- c:nr ses.ee =1:ue yes' ,sneui:: :e et::-ne in 22 7tr'Or-ed by

_

M---

1:nu11 ::::r~. = 22 .*'RC. h'! - b'

Ca:a.-

d

i-

.

.

1

e -

!_, _ _ . _ _ . - . - _ _ _ _ _ _ . -_. _ _ ___ - _ _ . -

x rO .. w ' -_ . _ . |-a-_ _ _ _ _ - .~:e ..:. - _ _ _ _ _ .

2UP 820 2 ,'. ATTACHMENT F'' ,RavisLon 1%e .,(Page 1 of 2) Apri l 7, ICE 7~

7010CFR50.53 FORMAT FOR SAFETY EVALUATION

'

STATION UNIT

SYSIEM TEST / PROCEDURE No d8/4570 ,/ber

. . _ _ _ . - --.--. . ...

- -- m. - . . - . . ..-...--..-..a.w..

. '

LAP @20-2-ATTACHMENT F Revisien 19 ,,

(f age 1 of 2) April 7, toA?2n

10CFR50.59 FCRMAT FOR SAFETY EVALUATION

STATION [A UNIT#

SYSTEM //#JJ _ TEST / PROCEDURE No /,,.2/ /JJC Q5'~di A's W a f

TEST / PROCEDURE TITLE #gIJ REVISION 2-

EQUIPMENT NAME

'EqulPMENT NUMBER

, . . , _ . = _z. m

DESCRIPTION OF TEST / PROCEDURE

h d'Y Y/}|ffftsj &n

- -

.

|.

SAFETY EVALUATION: Answer ths folicwing questiens with a "yes" er "no",and provide spnili:

-

reasons justifyirg the decisicmis the pecbability ci en occurrence or the comaquence ci en cccident, or malfuncticn of

I

es previously evclucted in ths Finc! Sciety Anclysis Rupert1,' .-ecpipment imper *cnt to scieit d? Yes No, Because: ~

Mh, fgr

Is the possi'aility ict en accident or malfuncticn of a different type th=n any previcuslyYes Y No, Beccuse:2.evolucW in the Finct Sciety Anclysis Report created?

W0 0 f01 3

Is the mergin ei sefery, es defined in the bcsis fer =ny Technic =( S=ecificerien, redue:d?| 3.'Yes V No, 34ccuse:

*fM h L 532gf 1 1answer checked "YES" should be reported in :he Annual Recert.G* Note: Any

:o the NRC

. .:/~ n_ =:= /.0 /4-

em.=rm=c :x

k .Ba eeAprrous4 tyM

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .. _

.

'. If . .b. . LAP-320-2 ' ,_...

Rev.sien 19. . _. .- i. . . . _ _ . . - . . .--

._ ._

ADFII 7. 1982. .. ...ATTACHMENT F 21 fina0* *

. .

..

.

. .

- - (Page 2 of 2)'-,

SAFETY EVALUATION CHECKLIST (10 CFR 30.39).;] , .- TEST /?ROCEDURE No. Q)D i]]O-pfi*

REVI$10N dn

-

'

. !

-- Does this constitute a change to procedures

as described in Safety Analysis Report?., ,

*t

1 I:: ( ) .!c(K I'

acr.nt:21 S:ecifica:icn -F } ;s 1 : .anga n. ==.i . , linrelved?

_.

e /M.| 'r , _ . . . . . . ._ .. _a-- - ,

Answer- the f:llowing :uesti ns wi a a *ys:' r ' :' , jSAFri / r/AL"ATIC;I: 1and ;r:vida,s:ecific reasens justi'ying me incisten: I

..

'Is ce :r:baciti:y of (n ec: r tnes. -Me =nsecuence of 2nb !. . 1:n of saf t:y esit:ac equi::sn:, 55 ;rtvt:::!yac:ican:, er :r.11! :::, ' inertise?evatustad in Me f r.al Safety analysis Re:crt, .

m yes g :

_.. .. . . ~ , . - _- _ ._ . . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ -

$~- . . LAP 320 2- -. ,ATTACH 9ENT F

<,

Ravisien 19' -* - @ age I of 2} April , tc Ah

-'

.-

2010CFR50.59 FCRMAT F ;R SAFETY EVALUATICN

STATION i f /' / 20 ^ O ', L O 1A(, E UNIT O

SYSTEM d2M TEST /PRCCEDURE No L E /'UC %_C4cn ftgut, CwrnMMEM RUL Ar* 3

TEST / PROCEDURE TITLE Ta t 4e81,, REV1SICH.

EQUlPMENT NAME-

EQUIPMENT NUMBER^

-

.:-, -u. -

.

DESCRIPTION CF TEST /PRCCEDURE-

OtN. Y % )* YALbkcS k(494i

.

.

..

.

. .

t -

SArcif EVALUATICN: Answer ths following questions with a "yes' er "no", and gwide s.oreift:i s

reasons [ustifyire the decision:Is the pechobility of en occurrence or the corzequence of en eccident, or malfunction of-I i F.s= ortegipment important to scieges previously ewslueted in ths Final Sciety Analys sSM.a @' . -

1.

, A /oP @j%No, 'oecausa:increased? , Yes -.

Is the possi~oility fer en accident or malfunction ci e different typs th=n any previouslyYes V No, Seccuse:2.evolucted in the Final Saisty Arelysis Report created?

-

a, , % @ * * -

!s the mergin ei seiery, es defined in the basis fer eny Technie=1 Specifie:rion, reduced?3._Yes % No, 34couse:

& +&p.fa,

Any answer enecked "YES" should be reported in :he Annual Recor:.-

* Note:to the NRC

N/ m ,= h {/ L.3 -.pe, =rm== sz// Joe

. spwa ty v_. . _

- _ . _ _ _ . . . I^^' ~~ ~

-.1. .. .-~

- .lap.320-2

_ ' . - . . .. ,. . ; , . . ~~Ra ision g.. -.-. -- . _ ._-_#APII 7' 1902* ., .~

.ATTACliMENT F 'l finaf..

.i . . .

(Fage 2 of 2)' --- -.

- .

SAFETY EVALUATION CHECKLIST 0 CFR 30.33).;-) ; #TEST /PRCCEOURE No. / / sDo-4,. ,**

RC'!!SION 3-.

"g. < . .-

-Does this constitute a change to proceduresas described in Safety Analysis Repert?- ,

|"i.

'

1 (2: ( ) !!c?t

-

. . . . - - -- . _. - - . . . - - .. . ,-

*

.

2: LAP 820 2-ATTACHMENT F', Revisien 19*'' - -

''- @ age 1 of 2) April 7, 19A7-

D10CFR50.59 FCRMAT FOR SAFITY EVALUATICN

STATION d- M UNIT OSYSTEM MM TEST /PRCCEDURE No G A /J.?C c|)8

vh A Cina Gh-,

URE TITLE A7 . AM d MI REVISdN &TEST /PROCE-

-

EQUIPMENT NAMEe

EqulPMENT NUMBER.:-- ~ - - - -

1 z-

f DESCRIPTION CF TEST / PROCEDURE'-

b|W+Y & YSU1 ,4$ /4 r ) f Act n f sd >% Bu &

...

.

.

SAFcTY EVALUATICN: Answer the following questions with a *yes* cr''no", and ,,iwide sereific=

'

reasons justifyirg the decisicm.-

Is the prebobility of en occurrence or the coresquence of en accident, or malfunction of*1equipment important to sciety es prwviously evelueted in ths Final Sciety Anclysis P.scort

' . - 1.

increased? Yesd No, Because:

-

0 ly'> ,

Is the possi*aility fer en accident or malfunctico of a different typs then any previouslyX Na, Secaus,a:2. Yesevaluated in the Final Saisty Analysis Report created?

p-' .df. M AN[-

Is the mergin =f sefery, es defined in the basis f=r eny Technic =1 5=ecific=rien, redue:d?3.' Yes V No, Sac =use:

g }Any answer enecked "YES" should be reported in the Annual Report.d* Note::o :he NRC

,

W =4e, - %-tePerierrnec :y' _ - -

hf ,/ u.w 2, M Ma

--- -- - - - . _ . . ._ _ __

.., , ..

LAP-320-2- .;. . -. . .r . .. g,yg,,9

. - --- . ._ . - . . ._

_ _ _

April 7, 1982.. .- . . ATTAcangny y 21 finM' |- -.. , *. . . . ,.

(Page 2 of 2) -' * -*- - . '.

SAFETY EVALUATION CHECKLIST (10 CFR 30~d3.;d , .

,,

TEST /PROCECURE No. ( # /330 -* -REVI$ ION t--

.". -j ! ,-

- Does this constitute a change to procedures jas described in Safety Analysis Report?, ,

t..

'

J, I : ( ) 10 FJ _'' #

,5 is a manga in == Tecnnt:al 1:ec1 fica:1:n '3;invcivec7

.s . . , -en.I ..,. ,. . . . . . .: .--SAFITI I'/At.'.!ATIC:t: Answer ce fullcwing :vestiens wiu 1 'y'.

' :r ' :' ,.

an:1 pr:vids,s:ecific reas ns justifying t'.e incisten:|

. . .

' '

Is ce :r:babili:y cf (n, cccur snes. et ::nsecuence of 2nC t. .1.1 rtvi:u-lyac:icant, er ..:alfun :1:n of saft y esta:ad a;uf:. snt., 'evaluated in 2e Final Safaty analysis Re:cet, incrtsse? .

.t _Y es No,*-

(UJ/K(M. ,

--

- .

Is ce ; ssibility for in ac:ican: er maifune:i:n :( a :(!fut:i: .1r'L 2. ty:e can any Ortvicusly avaiuatad n es Fina) Saft y *.: lysis^t Racert cr: stat.? Yes

!fe ,

a= .S-. gp ' ~.

3.. Is ce ::aqin of saft:7. as :f tfined i t."basis f:r any ~c:n-it:I

Scecifica:1:n, rtducad7 Yes 'f e ,

; &. &'

-

.

.

? Anv Ansser * Yes ( ) I AllAnswersMc%,

.. .|

iecut:0 in teti ac 'D;0 lear| | Raget a::: f ;:m.ts1:n'I ,| I :: :-- 1: m !ae :rmee.

.

; t

I -

[ .' e=:- :::t:n Receivec ( ) |L- . ,

,

Inttista Pr:cuurt/ Test !,=,.

' .W

,* ,,

s -

n*[ f n$'dW $ f" af $3yS$

E d"~"3td Dy /IT| 7 sr. Oui: be .t:0*"*10 !5 ". 3

*

b1.a.a.uli "t *F* *: . NRC.""' _[ ' bOa".2

.-

r.' -1 ,.

O

__ y - _ _ - - 7 _._m---

,I. t , ..~

.

O* 'ATTACHMENT F. g ; cn

. .9

<* ~ (Page 1 of 2) April 7, 19R7*

'

10CFRSO.53 FCRMAT FCR SAFETY EVALUATION

STATION dd da f.f_f UNIT O

SYSTEM M MM TEST /PRCCEDURE No (_ ? / / J J 0 - J 2.Ibsr.nw asur Dwaas, as me [. REVISIONTEST / PROCEDURE TITLE 6,f a. Arawu wd'A -

.

~EqulPMENT NAME-

EqulPMENT NUM3ga_..- -

--_. _

DESCRIPTION OF TEST / PROCEDURE '- h&No cde & JU p|c psW cdA|dhoc/ '4. jj

:.' .. .

.

.

SAFETY EVA!.UATICN: Answer the following questions with a "yes* cr''no", and provide- :sseific=

reasons justifying the decisien:~

Is the pechobility of en occurrence or the corzequence of en cecident, or rnolfunction ei'1e9:ipawnt importent to sciety as previously ewluated in ths Final Sciety Anclysis h= ort

1.' -

increased? YesV No, Because:

'

.

!s the possi'aility fer en cecident or rnolfunction ei a different type then any previouslyYes T No, Beecus.3:2.evolvered in the Final Sciety Analysis hport created?

(hk

Is the mergin ci sciery, es defined in the basis fer eny Technic =i 5pecifie=rien, reduced?3._Yes 4 No, Seesuse:

ASOAny answer enecked "YES" should be rescried in the Annual Report.* Note::o the NRC s

,b

I cUn$

_ K2x pk,,,+-n,(J

--

_. . - - - . - ._ - _ . . .- _ -.

|

' ' " - - * = - + - ... , , , _ , _

0

...

i .? t.Ap.320 2- . .j

.

.j....*e g,y;, g 9 1.-. . .. - . ~ . . ..-. _ . . .

_ - _ _ #0fII 7 I982 |... . .

ATTACHMENT F 21 fino.f'- *... *

.. . . ,.(Page 2 of 2) -~ ," --

m .SAFETY EVALUAil0N CHECKLIST (10 CFR 50.53).; ) g

# TEST /PRCCEDURE No. 4PfdJo.3L,. ,_REVISION /-

-

n *

. f ,,.

-. Does this constitute a change to procedures ,

'

as described in Safety Analysis Report?, ,

.'6!c %. -, I I:: ( )

-

I;s 1 :.anga n . : Tecn=te:.! 3:ec1ti:2:1cn---plinvolved?.s.., .. *e& _- T . . . . . . ..| 's'_ .. --

:r '':'.Answer the fell wing :uestiens wi*h t 'y*.:'.gSAFET/ I'/ALUATIC*l:[.. and pr:vids,s;ecific reascas justifying :he feef sfen: I

'

Cs :nt :r:babilf:y of (n, cec::r snes. ht ::nsecuence Of in12 ;rtvi:u:!y.

b t. ac:teanc. cr malfunctica of saf t:y rill:ac equi:= tnt.'. incrtsse?svaluated in :ne Final Safaty analysis Re: ort, ..-m Yes T No,:F.. p o ,O r, a

.,...

- ,

f:r an acciden cr ma functi:n :( t tiffren:*r' Is the :cssibill:7

ty;s nan any Ortvicusly evaluatad in =e Final 54f t-/ .-:ly:f s,[ 2.^Re cre : st:at? Yes V No ,, , %' -Ou-, ' ~ 8M . -* g,

1

Is the = art n of safety, as defined in :he basis f:r any ~c:nni: ;i3..S ecificatten, rtducad? Yes N-No ..

a wTn- .a.-AllAns. vert |{ojdl- .

f- _ Anv Anrser * Ye(( ) e.. .

secus:: in t:sive Weisar-'?.eg:!1::: / Can.is f.:n'tu:. :--:1-9 m % :. ene?. *|' ,

| - .

[[' ?.u--- ---' n Rec 2ivec ( ). ,L-

In1tia:a Pr::wcrt/ Test l!.cIementa:1:n