ohlone college environmental scan · ohlone college environmental scan ... there has also been a...

Ohlone College

Environmental Scan

Construction of the new Academic Core Buildings 3.18.19

Office of Research and Planning March 2019

2

OHLONE COLLEGE ENVIRONMENTAL SCAN MARCH 2019

Table of Contents Assumptions……………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………….3 Background and Demographics District ....................................................................................................................................... 5 The Economy and Housing ........................................................................................................ 17 Students ................................................................................................................................... 27 Student Success ........................................................................................................................ 37 Course Offerings ....................................................................................................................... 54 Community Colleges ................................................................................................................. 60 Staff ......................................................................................................................................... 71

3


Assumptions

The College will continue to rank among the highest performing community colleges in the state. The District will witness a declining pool of residents under the age of 24, but a dramatically increasing pool of adults aged 55+; conversely, college enrollment increasingly is dominated by students under age 25 and has seen a dramatic decrease of students over the age of 30. The District’s high educational attainment rate will generate expectations of academic excellence among most students—and their parents. Yet 25% of students are first generation, coming to college with very different expectations, particularly from parents. The Fremont campus is within one of the most affluent zip codes in Northern California and near one of the top performing high schools in the state. Elsewhere in the District there are high schools at or below state performance averages, and affluence is not characteristic of most neighborhoods, despite the high income averages. The College mission will continue to address comprehensive needs of transfer, career education, and degree completion; however, the College mission to meet basic skills and personal enrichment needs of students will diminish. The advent of AB705 will provoke early success for some students but will discourage those who now perceive to have less academic support. Students will want course choices and convenience, and they are capable of finding options elsewhere when the College cannot meet their needs. Declining enrollments and the Student Centered Funding Formula will drive the College to become smaller and more efficient, which, in turn, will translate into fewer adjuncts, fewer course and program offerings, and fewer opportunities for students to explore program and career options. Students will be digital natives; their technology skills and awareness will bring expectations for technology standards and availability, and they will constantly redefine “state of the art.” Millenials—children born between 1982 and 2002—approach learning in new ways. Their preference is to learn with technology, with each other, online, in their time, in their place, and by doing things that matter.

4


AB705 and Guided Pathways will decrease the number of units and, accordingly, the amount of time, necessary to complete a degree or transfer. The College will have less time to leave its mark on its students. As the premier institution for higher education within the District, the College can model academic excellence to other schools as well as to the community. Students of color will increasingly dominate ethnic proportions of enrollment, and their needs and interests will be fully considered and addressed appropriately. The College will maintain its commitment to access and to appropriately serve traditionally underrepresented populations. The development of Associate Degrees for Transfer (ADTs) and meta-majors will support transfer, while some career education programs become increasingly transfer-oriented to align with vocational professions expecting or requiring a baccalaureate degree. Local high schools are not growing substantially and, with both CSU and UC systems dramatically increasing the number of new student admissions, more District high school graduates will opt to attend university rather than community college, making community college recruitment within the District more challenging. Because of the high cost of living in the District, financial aid will become even more necessary for students who do not live with parents; but high wages in the District will also restrict the ability to qualify for financial aid. Attracting and keeping exceptional faculty and staff will become more difficult as the cost of living in the District accelerates at rates beyond salary increases. Legislators—both federal and state—will tend to be more intrusive into higher education, and the College will have to adapt programs and services to legislative mandates. Older adults seeking degree completion favor flexible, streamlined course offerings that can fit into an already-full schedule.

5


Background and Demographics

District

6


Background and Demographics: District

Ohlone College District encompasses three cities within Alameda County: Fremont, Newark, and Union City. 21.5% of the county population resides within the Ohlone Community College District, an increase of 0.9% since 2014. The population of the district is 350,872 residents, an increase (4.1%) from 2014. The dominant ethnic groups are Asian (43.1%) and White (20.6%); Hispanics (17.7%) represent the third largest ethnic group in the district. There has been growth in the district among Asians (+3.7%), but a decline among Whites and Hispanics since 2014. Over 6% of White residents have left the District (about 5000 residents). There has also been a notable decline in African Americans in the District, down 1,400 residents, a loss of almost 10% of African Americans living in the District. In the city of Fremont, where over half (56.1%) of Ohlone students reside, there is a culture of attainment: of the almost 70% of residents age 25 or over, 29.0% hold a baccalaureate degree and another 26.6% have earned graduate or professional degrees. Additionally, of the employed civilian population over the age of 16, over half (58.8%) work as management or as professionals. Since 2014, the percent of residents with a bachelor’s degree or higher has increased 3.8%, and the percentage of residents working as management or as professionals has increased 2.3%. This increase in management and professional occupations has been accompanied by a decline in sales and office jobs throughout the District. Females outnumber males in the district by 0.6%, a decrease from the 0.8% difference in 2015. Within the district there has been an aging tendency since 2014. The median age in Fremont is up 0.3 years, is up 1.1 years in Union City; however, Newark resident median age is 0.5 years younger than in 2014. Residents of all ages between 0-24 years have declined both in number and population rate despite a more than 4% growth in the population. The number of school age children in the District has remained relatively stable, but the rate within the overall population has declined 0.7% At the other end of the spectrum, adults 55+ have increased by 1.1% and in numbers by over 7600 residents. Per capita income has risen 14.9% in just the past two years while median family income, at $121,957, is up 15.2%. The number of individuals in poverty within the district has decreased 1.9% despite having been on the rise as recently as 2016. The annual earnings for all residents by educational attainment have increased. Residents with less than a high school diploma have shown the greatest rise in income, up 22% ($5372) over 2016. Residents with a bachelor’s degree have seen earnings increase by 12%, but that translates to an additional $8881. High school graduates are now earning 7% more ($2528) than in 2016, and those with some college or an associate’s degree are up 8% ($3427). Residents who have a graduate degree showed the largest dollar gain ($9259), reflecting a 9% increase over 2016.

7


Given the upturn in the economy, most recent unemployment rates specific to the district show 5.7% of Newark working residents are unemployed, while Fremont and Union City had rates of 5.3% and 6.8% respectively. Each of these unemployment rates are down 1.7%-2.3% from 2016.

American Community Survey 2017:

RACE Fremont % Newark % Union

City %

District Total

%

American Indian 735 0.3% 139 0.3% 239 0.3% 1,113 0.3%

African American

6,729 2.9% 2,250 4.9% 3,673 4.9% 12,652 3.6%

Asian 116,088 50.3% 10,199 22.4% 24,942 33.5% 151,229 43.1%

Filipino 16,193 7.0% 3,668 8.1% 14,462 19.5% 34,323 9.8%

Hispanic 31,101 13.5% 15,394 33.8% 15,542 20.9% 62,037 17.7%

Pacific Islander 1,952 0.8% 355 0.8% 1,136 1.5% 3,443 1.0%

White 49,186 21.3% 11,580 25.4% 11,498 15.5% 72,264 20.6%

Multi-racial 8,525 3.7% 1,935 4.2% 2,742 3.7% 13,202 3.8%

Other 455 0.2% 34 0.1% 120 0.2% 609 0.2%

Total 230,964 45,554 74,354 350,872

PLACE OF BIRTH OR

CITIZENSHIP STATUS Fremont % Newark %

Union City

% District Total

%

Native 118,770 51.4% 29,072 63.8% 39,669 53.4% 187,511 53.4%

Foreign born 109,638 47.5% 15,787 34.7% 33,739 45.4% 159,164 45.4%

Naturalized Citizen

60,471 26.2% 9,916 21.8% 21,943 29.5% 92,330 26.3%

Not a citizen 49,167 21.3% 5,871 12.9% 11,796 15.9% 66,834 19.0%

GENDER Fremont % Newark % Union

City %

District Total

%

Male 113,862 49.3% 22,965 50.4% 37,552 50.5% 174,379 49.7%

Female 117,102 50.7% 22,589 49.6% 36,802 49.5% 176,493 50.3%

Total 230,964 45,554 74,354 350,872

8


AGE Fremont % Newark % Union

City %

District Total

%

Under 5 14,824 6.4% 2,414 5.3% 4,420 5.9% 21,658 6.2%

Age 5 - 19 43,236 18.7% 8,465 18.6% 11,602 15.6% 63,303 18.0%

20-24 11,017 4.8% 2,818 6.2% 4,701 6.3% 18,536 5.3%

25-34 35,792 15.5% 7,180 15.8% 13,059 17.6% 56,031 16.0%

35-44 38,752 16.8% 6,704 14.7% 10,149 13.6% 55,605 15.9%

45-54 33,776 14.6% 6,784 14.9% 9,975 13.4% 50,535 14.4%

55-64 26,358 11.4% 5,641 12.4% 9,210 12.4% 41,209 11.7%

65 and over 27,209 11.8% 5,548 12.2% 11,238 15.1% 43,995 12.5%

Median age 37.7 37.7 38.2 37.8

INCOME AND

POVERTY Fremont % Newark %

Union City

% District Total

%

Households 73,617 13,395 21,106 108,118

Median household income (dollars)

$122,191 $96,817 $95,625 $113,863

Families 59,672 10,711 17,341 87,724

Median family income (dollars)

$130,360 $100,375 $102,341 $121,957

Per capita income (dollars)

$47,015 $35,920 $34,727 $42,971

Individuals in poverty

11,317 4.9% 2,870 6.3% 5,279 7.1% 19,466 5.5%

9


EDUCATIONAL

ATTAINMENT Fremont % Newark %

Union City

% District Total

%

Population 25 and over

161,887 31,857 53,631 247,375

High school graduate

28,510 17.6% 9,865 31.0% 14,742 27.5% 53,117 21.5%

Some college, no degree

24,267 15.0% 6,708 21.1% 11,454 21.4% 42,429 17.2%

Associate degree 9,268 5.7% 1,855 5.8% 3,291 6.1% 14,414 5.8%

Bachelor's degree

46,883 29.0% 6,742 21.2% 12,535 23.4% 66,160 26.7%

Graduate or professional degree

42,339 26.2% 3,228 10.1% 6,479 12.1% 52,046 21.0%

% High school grad or higher

93.4% 89.1% 90.4% 92.2%

% Bachelor’s degree or higher

55.2% 31.3% 35.5% 47.7%

MEDIAN EARNING

DURING 2017 BY

EDUCATIONAL

ATTAINMENT

Fremont Newark Union

City

District Total

Less than High School

$28,212 $31,935 $30,000 $29,362

High School Graduate

$37,150 $39,139 $36,822 $37,424

Some College or Associates Degree

$47,915 $50,652 $45,805 $47,588

Bachelor’s Degree

$83,178 $74,090 $67,386 $79,260

Graduate Degree $114,134 $94,596 $94,983 $110,538

10


LABOR AND

EMPLOYMENT

BY OCCUPATION

2017

Fremont % Newark % Union

City %

District Total

%

Employed civilian population 16 years and over

116,110 23,187 36,891 176,188

Management, professional and related

68,249 58.8% 9,316 40.2% 15,223 41.3% 92,788 52.7%

Service 12,971 11.2% 3,653 15.8% 6,020 16.3% 22,644 12.9%

Sales and office

21,553 18.6% 4,783 20.6% 8,014 21.7% 34,350 19.5%

Natural Resources, construction, and maintenance

5,065 4.4% 2,219 9.6% 2,682 7.3% 9,966 5.7%

Production, transportation, and material moving

8,272 7.1% 3,216 13.9% 4,952 13.4% 16,440 9.3%

Unemployed 4.6% 5.1% 5.4% 4.8%

LANGUAGE

SPOKEN AT

HOME

(POPULATION 5

YEARS AND

OVER)

Fremont % Newark % Union

City %

District Total

%

English 84,752 39.2% 19,838 46.0% 26,392 37.7% 130,982 39.8%

Other than English

131,388 60.8% 23,302 54.0% 43,542 62.3% 198,232 60.2%

Total 216,140 43,140 69,934 329,214

Ohlone College generally reflects the ethnic distribution of the district. Asians are the largest ethnic group in both the district and the college (43.1% and 37.9%). Whites are the second largest group

11


(20.6%) in the district but now rank third (15.8%) behind Hispanics (24.9%) at the college. Hispanics are the third largest in the district at 17.7% but have seen their share of the population decline from 18.2% in the past few years. Filipino/Pacific Islanders, with a student population of 10.8% (up 2.6% from 2016), equal the district total of 10.8%. African-American students attend at a rate 0.5% below the district population, reflecting a decline of 1400 African American residents in the district.

With the advent of a new funding formula, district socio-economic status will influence the amount of apportionment a college will receive. The funding formula is established in such a way as to give funding preference to those districts with large financial aid eligible populations. Ohlone will not benefit from this metric because the district is particularly affluent. Among district residents, only 14.9% have family incomes below $50,000, an amount often cited as the point below which students may qualify for financial aid—albeit minimal aid the closer the family is to the $50,000 mark. This rate of eligible families is less than half the statewide rate and means that the college will have far less financial aid students than average.

PUBLIC SCHOOL INFORMATION

There are three major high school districts that serve the Ohlone College District: Fremont Unified in Fremont, Newark Unified in Newark, and New Haven Unified in Union City. The combined student

Race Fremont % Newark % Union City %District

Total%

Ohlone

College

2018FA

%

American Indian 735 0.3% 139 0.3% 239 0.3% 1,113 0.3% 17 0.2%

African American 6,729 2.9% 2,250 4.9% 3,673 4.9% 12,652 3.6% 261 3.1%

Asian 116,088 50.3% 10,199 22.4% 24,942 33.5% 151,229 43.1% 3,250 37.9%

Filipino 16,193 7.0% 3,668 8.1% 14,462 19.5% 34,323 9.8% 873 10.2%

Hispanic 31,101 13.5% 15,394 33.8% 15,542 20.9% 62,037 17.7% 2,135 24.9%

Pacific Islander 1,952 0.8% 355 0.8% 1,136 1.5% 3,443 1.0% 54 0.6%

White 49,186 21.3% 11,580 25.4% 11,498 15.5% 72,264 20.6% 1,355 15.8%

Multi-racial 8,525 3.7% 1,935 4.2% 2,742 3.7% 13,202 3.8% 479 5.6%

Other 455 0.2% 34 0.1% 120 0.2% 609 0.2% 142 1.7%

Total 230,964 45,554 74,354 350,872 8,566

Comparison of Ethnicity between Ohlone College and Ohlone College District

Families <$50K Rate

Fremont 59,672 7,700 12.9%

Newark 10,711 1,917 17.9%

Union City 17,341 3,433 19.8%

District 87,724 13,050 14.9%

Alameda County 379,405 88,504 23.3%

California 8,862,523 2,903,224 32.8%

Families with Annual Income below $50,000

12


populations for grades 9-12 of those three districts provide a glimpse of prospective students. Notably, 43.9% of high school students in the district are Asian, while only 12.4% are white; Hispanics comprise 24.7% of district high school enrollment, and 12.0% are Filipino/Pacific Islander. African-Americans, at 3.8% of the high school population, align with both the district’s 3.8% and the college’s 3.7% populations. Since 2016 the biggest changes to the high school demographics in the district are the 3.1% increase in Asian high school population and the 1.9% decline in White high school population. Since 2008 there has been a 11.9% decline in White high school population rate. In eight years White high school students have gone from one-in-four to one-in-eight in district high schools. Asian high school population rate has increased 10.2% over the same time period with Hispanic students gaining 3.6% in high school population rate. In terms of numbers of White students attending high school in the district, there has been a 51.3% decline; similarly, Asian and Hispanic student count has gone up 30.8% and 9.2% respectively. District high schools generally are performing at rates equal to those of two years prior. Graduation rates at district high schools are 92%. The rates of student completion of CSU/UC entry requirements are above the statewide average for all but one high school, but the overall completion rates have declined 5.3% since 2015. The rate of district high school students who enroll at the college has declined by 4.4%; however, the total number of students enrolled from district high schools has remained the same (4028 in 2015FA and 4033 in 2018FA). This decline in the rate of district high school students enrolling at the college, of course, could reflect the increased preparedness to enter CSU/UC among district high school graduates as they opt for university rather than community college. High school students from outside the district are most likely to come from Milpitas High School (245) or high schools in Hayward (160) and Pleasanton (76).

2013-14

Grads

2014-15

Enrolled %

2014-15

Grads

2015-16

Enrolled %

2015-16

Grads

2016-17

Enrolled %

2016-17

Grads

2017-18

Enrolled %

American 451 97 21.5% 436 75 17.2% 426 78 18.3% 485 81 16.7%

Irvington 486 40 8.2% 463 32 6.9% 521 50 9.6% 474 48 10.1%

Kennedy 337 58 17.2% 354 61 17.2% 338 71 21.0% 332 63 19.0%

Logan 815 187 22.9% 813 215 26.4% 792 196 24.7% 756 164 21.7%

Mission San Jose 531 46 8.7% 517 51 9.9% 540 52 9.6% 465 47 10.1%

Newark Memorial 392 96 24.5% 413 123 29.8% 413 131 31.7% 315 88 27.9%

Washington 450 110 24.4% 428 117 27.3% 386 148 38.3% 392 123 31.4%

Bridgepoint Continuation 39 8 20.5% 33 15 45.5% 44 8 18.2% 28 6 21.4%

Robertson Continuation 92 29 31.5% 81 15 18.5% 78 24 30.8% 59 23 39.0%

Total 3593 671 18.7% 3538 704 19.9% 3538 758 21.4% 3306 643 19.4%

13


American

IndianAsian

Pacific

IslanderFilipino Hispanic

African

AmericanWhite

Multiple

Races

Not

reported

State Grades 9-12 0.6% 9.3% 0.5% 2.9% 53.3% 5.8% 23.9% 2.9% 0.9%

Alameda County 9-12 0.3% 24.0% 1.1% 5.8% 33.9% 10.6% 19.5% 4.3`% 0.6%

Fremont Schools

Grade 9 0.4% 58.9% 0.4% 6.5% 15.2% 2.7% 12.9% 3.0% 0.0%

Grade 10 0.3% 58.2% 0.5% 6.9% 15.7% 2.7% 13.0% 2.8% 0.0%

Grade 11 0.2% 58.3% 0.9% 7.7% 13.7% 2.3% 14.7% 2.3% 0.0%

Grade 12 0.3% 56.0% 0.4% 6.2% 15.0% 2.9% 17.2% 2.0% 0.0%

Newark Schools

Grade 9 0.2% 11.6% 1.4% 10.0% 52.8% 4.9% 14.0% 4.3% 0.8%

Grade 10 0.0% 12.2% 1.3% 9.6% 55.0% 4.3% 14.7% 2.6% 0.4%

Grade 11 0.2% 12.3% 1.7% 9.0% 53.5% 4.5% 16.1% 1.7% 0.9%

Grade 12 0.2% 15.8% 1.7% 9.5% 51.7% 4.8% 14.1% 2.2% 0.0%

Union City Schools

Grade 9 0.2% 24.8% 1.1% 21.8% 36.6% 5.8% 4.9% 4.8% 0.0%

Grade 10 0.0% 21.6% 2.4% 22.3% 37.7% 5.8% 6.1% 4.2% 0.0%

Grade 11 0.4% 22.6% 3.7% 22.0% 33.3% 6.9% 6.6% 4.6% 0.0%

Grade 12 0.3% 21.5% 2.2% 22.0% 37.9% 6.5% 5.7% 4.0% 0.1%

Total District 9-12 0.3% 43.9% 1.1% 10.9% 24.7% 3.8% 12.4% 3.0% 0.1%

Comparative Demographics - Ohlone College to State, County, District

School Enrollment GraduatesGraduation

RateEnrollment Graduates

Graduation

Rate

American HS 460 429 93.3% 510 485 95.1%

Irvington HS 487 458 94.1% 495 474 95.8%

Kennedy HS 364 344 94.5% 362 332 91.7%

James Logan HS 860 798 92.8% 879 756 86.0%

Mission San Jose HS 525 514 97.9% 476 465 97.7%

Newark Memorial HS 438 404 92.9% 351 315 89.7%

Washington HS 442 421 95.3% 430 392 91.2%

Graduation Rates for District High Schools

2014-15 2016-17

14


School Graduates

Completion of

CSU/UC

Requirements

Completion

Rate

Compared

to 2014-15

State Rate

Graduates

Completion of

CSU/UC

Requirements

Completio

n Rate

Compared

to 2016-17

State Rate

American HS 429 286 66.7%23.3% over

state485 346 71.3%

24.5% over

state

Irvington HS 458 372 81.2%37.8% over

state474 338 71.3%

24.5% over

state

Kennedy HS 344 166 48.3%4.9% over

state332 163 49.1%

2.3% over

state

James Logan HS 798 506 63.4%20.0% over

state756 357 47.2%

0.4% over

state

Mission San Jose HS 514 476 92.6%49.2% over

state465 424 91.2%

44.4% over

state

Newark Memorial HS 404 70 17.3%26.1%

below state315 112 35.6%

11.2%

below state

Washington HS 421 266 63.2%19.8% over

state392 227 57.9%

11.1% over

state

2014-15 Graduates 2016-17 Graduates

Percent of District High School Graduates Completing CSU/UC Entry Requirements

High School 2015FA 2018FA Change

American 511 521 2.0%

Irvington 489 603 23.3%

Kennedy 446 516 15.7%

Logan 866 822 -5.1%

Mission San Jose 342 281 -17.8%

Newark Memorial 647 605 -6.5%

Washington 595 571 -4.0%

Bridgepoint 39 32 -17.9%

Robertson 93 82 -11.8%

Total Enrollments 8549 7832 -8.4%

Percent Total

Enrollment from

District High Schools

47.1% 51.5%

(Excludes Dual Enrollment and Consortium)

Enrollment by District High Schools

15


Overall the district dropout rate is below the state and county dropout rates, and have all declined dramatically in the past two years. The district dropout rate is less than 1% but was more than 3% two years prior. In the same period, the countywide dropout rate fell by 7.7% (from 9.6%) and the state rate is down 8.3% (from10.7%).

Milpitas 245

Mt. Eden, Hayward 77

Tennyson, Hayward 45

Amador Valley, Pleasanton 39

Hayward 38

Castro Valley 37

Foothill, Pleasanton 37

Granada, Livermore 33

Piedmont Hills, San Jose 28

Dublin 20

Other Sending High Schools 2018FA

American

IndianAsian

Pacific

IslanderFilipino Hispanic

African

AmericanWhite Total

American HS 0.0% 0.2% 5.6% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3%

Irvington HS 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.3% 0.3%

Kennedy HS 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.7% 0.9% 1.5% 0.6% 0.7%

Mission San Jose HS 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.0% 0.2%

Washington HS 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 0.4% 0.5%

Newark Memorial HS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.1% 1.2% 0.0% 0.2%

Logan HS 0.0% 0.7% 1.8% 0.1% 1.4% 0.4% 0.5% 0.9%

County Total 3.6% 0.5% 2.9% 0.7% 3.1% 3.6% 1.0% 1.9%

State Total 5.0% 0.6% 2.4% 0.7% 2.8% 4.5% 1.5% 2.4%

Dropout Rates for District High Schools 2016-2017

16


School enrollment within the district for 2013-14 was 52,782, compared to 53,303 in 2017-18, an increase of 1.0%. High school enrollments in the district have gone from 16,183 in 2013-14 to 16,321 in 2017-18, also an increase of 1.0%. High school graduation rates declined by 2.3% (from 94.2% to 91.9%) between 2014-15 and 2016-17. However, the number of high school graduates ready to start college in Fall 2017 was less than the number two years prior by 149, nonetheless, virtually the same number of district high school graduates (4033 to 4028) were enrolled at the college in 2018FA as were in 2015FA.

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 % Change

Fremont

Elementary (Grades 1-8) 23,879 24,142 24,779 24,996 25,378 6.28%

High School (9-12) 10,008 10,066 10,073 10,175 10,399 3.91%

Newark

Elementary (Grades 1-8) 4,305 4,221 4,128 4,013 4,008 -6.90%

High School (9-12) 1,989 1,975 1,885 1,832 1,905 -4.22%

Union City

Elementary (Grades 1-8) 8,415 8,355 8,067 7,838 7,596 -9.73%

High School (9-12) 4,186 4,194 4,104 4,055 4,017 -4.04%

District

Elementary (Grades 1-8) 36,599 36,718 36,974 36,847 36,982 1.05%

High School (9-12) 16,183 16,235 16,062 16,062 16,321 0.85%

District School Enrollment Trends

17



The Economy and Housing

18


BACKGROUND AND DEMOGRAPHICS: THE ECONOMY AND HOUSING Employment gains and losses are important drivers of the economic health of an area and have particular influence on the vitality of the college. In recessionary times, such as what was experienced between 2007-2010, unemployment is on the rise, and people seeking career changes or the opportunity to go to, or return to, college push up college enrollment. When the economy is stronger and more people are in the workforce, as is currently the case, sustaining college enrollment is more challenging. Additionally, the college must be responsive to the changing and emerging occupations and industries in the region it serves and ensure that college programs are relevant to workforce needs. The current trend in Silicon Valley (of which the college district is part) is a decreasing rate of job growth in the Tier 2 (mid-skill, mid-wage) occupations. These are jobs that generally require some college or an associate degree. Concurrently, Tier 1 jobs, generally requiring at least a baccalaureate degree, are increasing at a rate 5% higher than Tier 2 jobs. This trend would support an approach to curriculum building that focuses on general transfer and CTE programs that lead to transfer. Terminal associate degrees, except in a few areas, will not align well with the emerging employment trends in the Silicon Valley. Another consideration is that the median wage difference among the Tiers in Silicon Valley reflects the greatest wage disparity in the nation. Tier 1 median wages are $118,000, while Tier 2 median wages are $56,000. Tier 3 (low-skill, low-wage) median wages are $28,000. The $90K disparity between Tier 1 and Tier 3 median wages in Silicon Valley compares to a national difference of only $50K and illustrates the premium placed on education and the benefits aligned with degree completion in the Bay Area. To illustrate, Silicon Valley graduates with a graduate degree earn almost $88K more than those without a high school diploma; in the past decade, this gap has widened more than $17K. From EDD’s Labor Market census of quarterly employment and wages specific to the Bay Area, a study was done in 2016 of those area industries that best align with college programs and offer employment in the district. The highest number of job openings align with college programs in the departments of Computer Studies (CS) and Multimedia (MM). Significant numbers of jobs are also available for graduates in the departments of Biotechnology (BIOT), Engineering (ENGI), Early Childhood Studies (ECS), Kinesiology (KIN), and Business Administration (BA). In the district there were 786 specific occupations providing 155,844 jobs in 2016. This represents a 13.5% (18,546 jobs) increase within the district since 2013, above the Bay Area increase of 10.8% and the state increase of 8.3%. The greatest growth rate came from automobile manufacturing as Tesla added over 4000 jobs between 2013-2016. In October 2016, Tesla announced plans to add an additional 3000 jobs within the district. The two largest occupations in the district are computer programming and computer systems design, both aligned with programs at the college. Other occupations that align with college programs were also tracked. The most significant growth in Bay Area occupations are in those areas that align with our Computer Studies (CS), Business Administration (BA), Nursing (NUR), Computer Networks and Emerging Technology (CNET), and

19


Multimedia (MM) departments, with some growth realized for Early Childhood Studies (ECS) and Kinesiology (KIN) majors.

Fremont, Newark, and Union City are the three cities that, by virtue of their industries, are a part of Silicon Valley. (Silicon Valley is comprised of Santa Clara County, San Mateo County, Scotts Valley in Santa Cruz County, and Fremont, Newark, and Union City in Alameda County.) According to Silicon Valley Joint Venture 2018, Silicon Valley industry employment has now far surpassed pre-recession levels, up 19.0% since 2007. After the job losses from 2007-2009, the beginning of the economic recovery in 2010 saw job growth in Silicon Valley of 27%, with a similar gain of 24% in Alameda County; this is compared to gains of 17% in California and 12% nationwide. The region added 47,272 jobs in 2017, an annual increase of 3.0%. This mirrors 2016 growth, but is down from the two years’ prior average of 4.2%. By comparison, the growth rate for Alameda County was 3.3%. More than half (52%) of new jobs were in industries such as healthcare, retail, construction, and

Description 2017 Jobs

Change in

Number of

Jobs

Percent

Growth in

Occupation

Annual Job

Openings

Regional

Completers

(2014)

Percent

Job

Market

met

Locally

Security Guards 28,948 1,302 5% 4,812 0 0%

Environmental Engineering Technicians 738 37 5% 83 6 7%

Computer Systems Analysts 30,054 5,239 21% 3,511 339 10%

Network and Computer Systems Administrators 14,705 1,147 8% 1,315 135 10%

Bookkeeping, Accounting, and Auditing Clerks 36,829 (579) (2%) 4,380 788 18%

Real Estate Sales Agents 2,601 (308) (11%) 252 47 19%

Accountants and Auditors 39,856 3,083 8% 4,498 870 19%

Real Estate Brokers 1,260 78 7% 142 47 33%

Correctional Officers and Jailers 2,157 (358) (14%) 228 94 41%

Broadcast Technicians 488 63 15% 68 32 47%

Fitness Trainers and Aerobics Instructors 8,953 1,699 23% 1,818 861 47%

Audio and Video Equipment Technicians 2,490 493 25% 361 182 50%

Police and Sheriff's Patrol Officers 14,098 828 6% 1,172 754 64%

Computer User Support Specialists 25,527 4,757 23% 3,233 2,230 69%

Registered Nurses 53,770 6,706 14% 4,757 3,539 74%

Preschool Teachers 14,938 1,810 14% 1,919 1,476 77%

Desktop Publishers 422 (20) (5%) 60 64 106%

Education Administrators, Preschool and Childcare 2,420 20 1% 204 223 109%

Graphic Designers 7,827 896 13% 981 1,073 109%

Interior Designers 2,223 390 21% 324 390 120%

Computer Programmers 12,670 (2,770) (18%) 970 1,856 191%

Physical Therapists 4,025 735 22% 387 790 204%

Environmental Scientists and Specialists 3,071 (341) (10%) 305 863 283%

Respiratory Therapists 3,017 311 11% 247 743 301%

Web Developers 7,817 946 14% 903 2,852 316%

Multimedia Artists and Animators 3,952 330 9% 444 1,623 366%

Interpreters and Translators 1,967 363 23% 284 1,079 380%

Computer Network Support Specialists 5,546 (86) (2%) 584 2,230 382%

Physical Therapist Aides 1,128 143 15% 176 720 410%

Radio and Television Announcers 545 (54) (9%) 101 473 470%

Environmental Science and Protection Technicians 1,142 (22) (2%) 155 851 550%

Film and Video Editors 1,030 105 11% 140 823 589%

Reporters and Correspondents 742 (26) (3%) 110 883 805%

Physical Therapist Assistants 476 27 6% 65 720 1102%

Detectives and Criminal Investigators 918 (53) (5%) 63 754 1203%

Respiratory Therapy Technicians 128 (13) (9%) 14 757 5407%

Bay Area Occupations Aligned with College Programs

20


education, with 17% in healthcare alone. Twenty-nine percent of the growth was within the tech sector. The regional unemployment continued to decline, reaching 2.5% unemployment in November 2017; however, district unemployment levels still approach 5%. Particularly notable is the metric that reflects per capita income for White residents of the region is three times higher than for Hispanic residents, despite a 3% higher gain for Hispanics than Whites. Poverty status by ethnicity reflects African Americans having almost three times the poverty rate of White residents (14.6% to 5.3%), with Hispanic residents similarly affected (13.6% in poverty). As the college looks forward to growing or emerging occupations and industries, one vital factor to keep in mind is the number of regional completions. There are numerous occupations that are growing for which the college has no aligned program; but it could also be true that other colleges in the region do have those programs and are producing adequate numbers of students to enter the workforce in those occupations. The college should embark on developing new programs for which already there are not sufficient completers from other colleges to meet the workforce needs. For instance, see below for occupations with job openings but more annual completers than there are jobs available.

Select Bay Area Occupations and Regional Completers

Occupation Annual Openings

(2017)

Annual Completers

(2014)

Medical Assistant 2,096 2,918

Hairdressers and cosmetologists 985 1,386

Construction Managers 981 8,387

Licensed Vocational Nurses 912 1,951

Pharmacy Technician 745 1,063

Massage Therapist 524 1,572

Dental Hygienist 413 829

Tax Preparer 411 1,045

Veterinary Assistant 402 810

Medical Records Technician 395 843

Paramedics and EMTs 323 1,052

Medical/Clinical Laboratory Technician

190 698

Occupational Therapist 177 900

Dieticians and Nutritionists 167 907

Although the college does do well in maintaining programs that align with occupations in the Bay Area, the changing economy and demographics have created growth in some occupations that the college does not specifically address but could be addressed within the scope of its current Strategic Plan.

21


Growing Occupations in the Bay Area Not Already Served by Programs

Occupation Annual Openings

(2017)

Annual Completers

(2014)

Personal Care Aides 19,402 170

Sales Representatives 7,515 286

Market Research/Marketing Specialists

6,143 304

Secretaries/Administrative Assistants

5,925 163

Electricians 3,523 358

Teachers' Assistants 3,318 6

Elementary School Teachers 2,732 1,363

Human Resource Specialists 2,588 235

Executive Secretaries 2,574 341

Nursing Assistants 2,322 749

Marketing Managers 2,138 353

Plumbers 1,947 59

Social and Human Services Assistants

1,265 246

Event Planners 629 6

Technical Writers 336 21

Library Assistants 321 28

Phlebotomists 262 188

Solar Voltaic Installers 259 0

Chemical Technicians 203 0

Cabinet Makers 197 4

Electrical and electronic Drafters 188 2

Human Resource Assistants 148 73

Surveyors 100 0

Silicon Valley’s innovation industry jobs increased by 3% between 2016 and 2017. Innovation companies are those that research and develop new technologies or support the development of startup companies. Over twenty-five percent of Silicon Valley’s total jobs are in innovation industries, the highest concentration of such industries in the world. In the innovative environment of the Silicon Valley, new occupations emerge that are not yet reflected in labor market information. The college must rely on advisory committees and industry news to discover what the new occupations will be, and then decide if these occupations are appropriate for developing new curriculum and programs. The college could also maximize its current curriculum that supports innovation. STEM degrees conferred in Silicon Valley, which are vital to innovation industries, increased by 10% over 2015 and by 56% over 2006. Thirty-eight percent of the degrees have been awarded to women, a rate that has remained constant since 2001.

22


Of particular significance to a college district is the high educational attainment level of the district residents. It is reasonable to assume that the higher the percentage of college-educated residents, the greater the expectation for children to attend college and the greater the expectation for the college to educate with excellence. More than half (60.9%) of Fremont residents 25 years of age or older possess one or more college degrees, compared to the county average of 51.2% and the national average of 38.8%. Fremont also exceeds the Silicon Valley average for residents with at least a bachelor’s degree, 55.2% to 51.0%. However, residents of Newark (37.1%) and Union City (41.6%) fall below the county average.

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT (POPULATION 25 YEARS AND OLDER)

Fremont Newark Union City

Alameda County

Silicon Valley

Less than high school 6.6% 10.9% 9.5% 12.4% 12.5%

High school graduate 17.6% 31.0% 27.5% 14.8% 17.9%

Some college 15.0% 21.1% 21.4% 15.9% 18.7%

Associate's degree 5.7% 5.8% 6.1% 6.8% 6.5%

Bachelor's degree 29.0% 21.2% 23.4% 26.8% 25.7%

Graduate or professional degree 26.2% 10.1% 12.1% 23.2% 19.0%

Despite the district’s educational attainment levels, Hispanic/Latino residents had the lowest level of educational attainment, with only 13% holding a bachelor’s degree or higher, down 2% since 2014. Similarly, the African American population with a bachelor’s degree or higher decreased from 34% to 29% from 2014 to 2017. The diversity of the district is illustrated by the number of homes where English is not the first language spoken. Compared to a national average of 21.3% and a state average of 44.0%, 60.8% of Fremont homes primarily communicate using a language other than English. Although the rate is lower in Newark (54.0%) and higher in Union City (62.3%), overall more than half of all homes represent a non-English background and culture. Fremont has seen non-English-speaking households increase 2.8%, a 1.6% increase in Newark, and there has been a 0.6% increase in Union City. Nationwide the gain has been 0.4%.

23


Languages Spoken at Home


English 39.2% 46.0% 37.7%

Spanish 8.4% 23.7% 13.6%

Other European 17.7% 9.6% 16.3%

Asian/Pacific Islander 33.9% 20.1% 31.5%

Other Languages 0.9% 0.6% 0.8%

More so than the rest of Alameda County, the college district residents are more likely to live in a single family home rather than in a residence built for multiple families. Union City has more than three times (4.1%) the number of residents living in mobile homes than the county average (1.2%). The district also has a lower vacancy rate (3.9%) than the county average (6.0%). However, households in all three district cities average more persons per household than the average.

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

Fremont Newark Union City SiliconValley

AlamedaCounty

California UnitedStates

60.8%

54.0%

62.3%

52.4%

44.6% 44.0%

21.3%

Percent of Population Speaking a Language Other than English at Home

24


All three cities in the district have higher median income levels than the county, the state, or the national averages. The median household income level in Fremont is 112% higher than the national average, as well as being almost 14% higher than the Silicon Valley average, but that gain must be tempered by the fact that the cost of living in the greater Silicon Valley is almost 50% higher than the national average. Median home sale prices are 210% of the national average, while rental rates exceed the average by 140% and child care costs are 130% of average.

Fremont Newark Union City Alameda County

Residents 227,934 44,677 73,500 1,605,217

Housing Units

Total Units 75,875 13,932 21,645 592,796

Single 55,511 73.2% 11,485 82.4% 15,928 73.6% 361,520

Multiple 19,527 25.7% 2,402 17.2% 4,825 22.3% 224,142

Mobile Homes 837 1.0% 45 0.3% 892 4.1% 7,134

Owner Occupied 44,986 59.3% 9,455 67.9% 13,490 62.3% 296,634

Renter Occupied 28,007 36.9% 4,067 29.2% 7,208 33.3% 267,659

Vacant 2,882 3.8% 410 2.9% 947 4.4% 28,503

Persons per household

Owner Occupied 3.13 3.23 3.54 2.92

Renter Occupied 3.05 3.44 3.47 2.64

Area Housing


Family households 80.8% 78.5% 82.6%

Non-family households 4.5% 6.7% 4.8%

People living alone 14.6% 14.8% 12.6%

Types of Households

25


$0

$20,000

$40,000

$60,000

$80,000

$100,000

$120,000

$140,000

Fremont Newark Union City SiliconValley

AlamedaCounty

California UnitedStates

$122,191

$96,817 $95,625

$106,761

$85,743

$67,169

$57,652

Median Household Income - 2017

26


27



Students

28


Background and Demographics: Students

Ohlone College serves 15,000 students in an academic year, down from 20,000 in 2007. 76.2% of students come from within the college district (up from 67.1% in 2013). In Fall 2015 there were 5% more female than male students; in Fall 2018 there were also 5% more female than male students. The percentage of students enrolled full time is the highest it has ever been at 40%. This number is up significantly over the 2007 rate of 27% and up 5% in just the past two years. Almost three-quarters (72%) are under the age of 25, with an average age of 28.4, a median age of 23.0, and a modal (most frequent) age of 19.0. Looking at Fall 2018 enrollment, Asians comprise the largest ethnic group on campus (38%), followed by Hispanic (25%) and White (16%). Hispanic enrollment has remained constant in the past two years and is the second largest ethnic group on campus, while Asian student population has increased 7%; White student population has gone down 4%. Enrollment status divides into 8% of students are first time students, 81% are returning or continuing Ohlone students. Because dual enrollment students often are in year-long classes, their fall enrollment rates are not reflective of their presence. Compared to fall 2018 enrollment, 16% of Ohlone students are concurrently enrolled in high school. Only 0.1% of students are from outside California. Eleven percent of students are evening students, the same as in 2015 but down 2% from 2017 and down 200 headcount from 2015. Thirty percent of students enroll for less than six units; ten years ago over half (52%) of students took less than six units, but in 2017 the rate was only 25%. Of the 40% who enroll as full-time students, 24% actually complete 12 or more units; that completion rate is up 5% over 2015.

29


Ohlone College

Student Access

Fall 2018

Gender Count Percent Age Group Count Percent

Female 4,440 52% 19 or less 3,043 36%

Male 4,044 47% 20-24 3,086 36%

Unknown 82 1% 25-29 1,009 12%

Total 8,566 30-34 509 6% 35-39 331 4%

Ethnicity Count Percent 40-49 372 4%

African American 261 3% 50+ 216 3%

Asian 3,250 38% Total 8,566

Filipino 873 10%

Hispanic 2,135 25%

Native American 17 0%

Pacific Islander 54 1% Mean Age Median Age Modal Age

White 1,355 16% 24.8 21.0 19.0

Multi-Ethnic 479 6%

Unknown 142 2% Full/Part Time Count Percent

Total 8,566 Full-time 3,431 40%

Part-time 5,135 60%

Total 8,566

Enrollment Status Count Percent Day-Evening Status Count Percent

First-time student 691 8% Day 6,718 78%

First-time transfer 638 7% Evening 934 11%

Returning student 986 12% Unknown 914 11%

Continuing student 5,910 69% Total 8,566

Special Admit (K-12) 313 4%

Unrecorded 28 0%

Total 8,566

30


Residence Count Percent

Alameda County 8,266 87.3%

Fremont 5,300 Attempted Units* Count Percent Newark 956 0.5-2.9 528 6.3% Union City 946 3.0-5.9 1,969 23.6% Hayward 579 6.0-8.9 1,303 15.6% Pleasanton 102 9.0-11.9 1,538 18.4% Livermore 94 12.0-14.9 1,890 22.6% San Leandro 73 15.0-17.9 994 11.9% Oakland 64

18.0-20.9 105 1.3% Castro Valley 55 21+ 29 0.3% Dublin 36 San Lorenzo 38 8,298 Other 23 Santa Clara County 793 8.4% San Jose 369 Earned Units* Count Percent Milpitas 350 0 1,080 12.9% Other 74 0.5-2.9 550 6.6% San Joaquin Valley 108 1.1% 3.0-5.9 2,104 25.2% Tracy 41 6.0-8.9 1,300 15.6% Other 67 9.0-11.9 1,292 15.5% Contra Costa County 137 1.4% San Ramon 47

Other 90

12.0-14.9 1,329 15.9% San Mateo County 36 0.4%

15.0-17.9 647 7.7% San Francisco City/County

30 0.3%

18.0-20.9 41 0.5% Other California counties

83 0.9%

21+ 13 0.2% Out of state/Foreign 11 0.1% *Excludes annual dual enrollment

31


Enrollment: After a high-enrolled 2014 fall semester (11,065 headcount), Ohlone College has seen consistent and significant decline in the fall enrollment in each of the following three years. Fall headcount for 2018 was 22.6% below the 2014 fall level. Similarly, annual headcount has declined 11.5% from 2014-15 to 2017-18. Curiously, FTES went down from 2014-15 to 2017-18 by only 4.5%. This does reflect the trend of the increasing full time enrollments so that fewer students generate more FTES. This also reflects another college trend, that of increasing international student enrollment. Because international students are generally required to enroll full time, more international students yield proportionately more FTES. But when international students are removed from the FTES count, the resident student FTES (those FTES generating apportionment) will see a greater decline; the drop in resident FTES from 2014-15 to 2017-18 is 7.4%.

Ohlone College

Total Annual FTES and Unduplicated Annual Enrollment

2010-11 to 2017-18

Year Annual FTES Percent Change Annual Headcount Percent Change

2010-11 8,735 -1.2% 17,728 2.7%

2011-12 8,353 -4.4% 15,555 -12.3%

2012-13 8,840 5.8% 16,064 3.3%

2013-14 8,596 -2.8% 15,979 -0.5%

2014-15 8,399 -2.3% 16,989 6.3%

2015-16 8,438 0.5% 16,714 -1.6%

2016-17 8,369 -0.8% 16,996 1.7%

2017-18 8,021 -4.2% 15,035 -11.5%

32


With the budget-imposed downsizing of the previous Newark site in Fall 2003—which at one point generated about 900 FTES—Ohlone College found itself without room to grow. One response was to develop online learning opportunities for students. Although a new Newark campus opened in Spring 2008, the college still had to address the course needs of students who had welcomed online classes as a natural component of the collegiate experience. Distance learning opportunities were increased to meet student needs, and compared to Fall 2004, online FTES has increased almost 350%. Since 2013, online enrollment has climbed 21% after a prior two-year decline. The current online FTES, however, is still below the one-year high in 2015.

8763

7977

8154

8363

76987765

7888

8133

77157590 7535

6000

6500

7000

7500

8000

8500

9000

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Resident Full Time Equivalent Students (FTES)

33


91.1

148.2

220.7

251.5

289.4 298.4

438.5

476.6461.6

407.7

465.1

536.2

443.6 447.6

493.6

0.0

100.0

200.0

300.0

400.0

500.0

600.0Distance Education FTES

34


A look at Full Time Equivalent Students (FTES) by credit type reveals the distribution of course selection by students from among transferable credit courses, vocational credit courses, or basic skills courses.

FTES by Credit Type

Transferable Credit

Vocational Credit

Basic Skills Credit

Total FTES*

Fall 2011 2,991.5 884.2 614.0 3,850.0

Spring 2012 3,119.6 993.3 551.1 4,038.2

Fall 2012 3,067.9 814.7 630.1 3,972.8

Spring 2013 3,201.0 873.7 541.2 4,014.0

Fall 2013 2,941.0 836.9 628.2 3,839.5

Spring 2014 3,013.9 846.0 515.5 3,816.2

Fall 2014 2,835.9 866.0 626.3 3,823.0

Spring 2015 3,021.9 803.5 467.8 3,717.0

Fall 2015 3,022.6 784.7 598.3 3,924.0

Spring 2016 3,224.2 856.1 407.8 3,870.9

Fall 2016 3,085.0 874.7 569.8 3,990.8

Spring 2017 3,277.5 824.0 389.9 3,841.3

Fall 2017 3,185.4 851.2 459.7 3,912.1

Spring 2018 2,826.0 790.9 283.9 3,273.8

Fall 2018 3,186.2 862.5 338.1 3,757.6

* Total FTES does not equal the sum of all credit types because vocational credit may also be transferable

Fall 2018 FTES is down slightly (1.7%) from 2014FA, and it is also down from the prior year by 3.9%. The greatest FTES drop is 2018SP, down almost 15% from 2017SP. Transferable credit makes up 84.8% of all courses, above the previous five-year average. Even with declining enrollment, fall enrollment in transferable courses is essentially the same as fall transferable enrollment of three years ago. This is a reflection of the collegewide emphasis that is placed on degree completion and transfer. Vocational credit, at 23.0% of courses, is up over the five-year-previous rate of 21.1%. Basic skills credit at 9.0% of courses is down from the five-year-previous rate of 14.7%, reflecting the move away from basic skills encouraged by AB705.

35


Student Demographic Year-to Year Trends:

Gender Fall 2014 Fall 2015

Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %

Female 5,147 47% 5,119 52% 4,879 51% 4,573 51% 4,440 52%

Male 5,809 52% 4,695 47% 4,566 48% 4,388 48% 4,044 47%

Unknown 109 1% 123 1% 110 1% 95 1% 82 1%

Total 11,065 9,937 9,555 9,056 8,566

Fall 2018Fall 2017

Fall Headcount Frequency and Percentage Distribution by Gender

Fall 2016

Ethnicity Fall 2014 Fall 2015


African-American 481 4% 429 4% 358 4% 334 4% 261 3%

American Indian 29 0% 23 0% 13 0% 12 0% 17 0%

Asian 3,001 27% 3,094 31% 3,274 34% 3,383 37% 3,250 38%

Filipino 884 8% 922 9% 947 10% 920 10% 873 10%

Hispanic/Latino 2,497 23% 2,379 24% 2,329 24% 2,194 24% 2,135 25%

Multi-Ethnic 511 5% 502 5% 479 5% 504 6% 479 6%

Pacific Islander 98 1% 72 1% 58 1% 64 1% 54 1%

Unknown 552 5% 521 5% 342 4% 155 2% 142 2%

White Non-Hispanic 3,012 27% 1,995 20% 1,755 18% 1,490 16% 1,355 16%

Total 11,065 9,937 9,555 9,056 8,566

Fall 2018

Fall Headcount Frequency and Percentage Distribution by Ethnic Group

Fall 2016 Fall 2017

Age Fall 2014 Fall 2015


19 or less 2,877 26% 3,095 31% 2,971 31% 3,065 34% 3,043 36%

20-24 3,265 30% 3,314 33% 3,634 38% 3,289 36% 3,086 36%

25-29 1,164 11% 1,139 11% 1,160 12% 1,135 13% 1,009 12%

30-34 889 8% 659 7% 561 6% 544 6% 509 6%

35-39 718 6% 509 5% 381 4% 360 4% 331 4%

40-49 1,265 11% 726 7% 518 5% 397 4% 372 4%

50+ 872 8% 492 5% 330 3% 266 3% 216 3%

Total 11,065 9,937 9,555 9,056 8,566

Fall 2018

Fall Headcount Frequency and Percentage Distribution by Age Group

Fall 2016 Fall 2017

Day/Evening Status Fall 2014 Fall 2015


Day 9,288 84% 8,252 83% 7,581 79% 7,036 78% 6,718 78%

Evening 1,305 12% 1,117 11% 1,182 12% 1,189 13% 934 11%

Unknown 472 4% 568 6% 792 8% 831 9% 914 11%

Total 11,065 9,937 9,555 9,056 8,566

Fall 2018

Fall Headcount Frequency and Percentage Distribution by Day/Evening Status

Fall 2016 Fall 2017

36


Unit Load Fall 2014 Fall 2015


0.1 - 2.9 Units 2,638 24% 1,242 13% 960 10% 356 4% 294 3%

3.0 - 5.9 2,052 19% 2,241 23% 2,155 23% 2,285 25% 2,142 25%

6.0 - 8.9 1,489 13% 1,409 14% 1,394 15% 1,513 17% 1,263 15%

9.0 - 11.9 1,661 15% 1,602 16% 1,514 16% 1,403 15% 1,436 17%

12.0 - 14.9 2,088 19% 1,967 20% 1,851 19% 1,814 20% 1,678 20%

15 or Over 1,137 10% 1,476 15% 1,681 18% 1,685 19% 1,753 20%

Total 11,065 9,937 9,555 9,056 8,566

Fall 2018Fall 2017Fall 2016

Fall Headcount Frequency and Percentage Distribution by Unit Load

Entering Academic Level Fall 2014 Fall 2015


AA Degree Recipient 523 5% 425 4% 494 5% 521 6% 460 5%

BA Degree Recipient 1,010 9% 608 6% 736 8% 841 9% 940 11%

High School Graduate

Without a College Degree 7,420 67% 7,627 77% 7,631 80% 6,946 77% 6,589 77%

Not a High School

Graduate 21 0% 126 1% 114 1% 90 1% 77 1%

Special Admit student

currently enrolled in K-12 442 4% 694 7% 260 3% 399 4% 313 4%

Unknown 1,649 15% 457 5% 320 3% 259 3% 187 2%

Total 11,065 9,937 9,555 9,056 8,566

Fall 2018Fall 2016

Fall Headcount Frequency and Percentage Distribution by Entering Academic Level

Fall 2017

Enrollment Status Fall 2014 Fall 2015


Continuing Student 6,019 54% 5,758 58% 6,383 67% 6,089 67% 5,910 69%

First Time Student 1,588 14% 845 9% 736 8% 719 8% 691 8%

First Time Student Transfer 1,686 15% 1,064 11% 894 9% 671 7% 638 7%

K-12 Student 442 4% 694 7% 260 3% 399 4% 313 4%

Returning Student 1,224 11% 1,231 12% 1,164 12% 1,158 13% 986 12%

Uncollected/Unreported 106 1% 345 3% 118 1% 20 0% 28 0%

Total 11,065 9,937 9,555 9,056 8,566

Fall 2018

Fall Headcount Frequency and Percentage Distribution by Enrollment Status

Fall 2016 Fall 2017

37


There has been an 22.6% decline in student headcount from 2014FA to 2018FA

There has been a 72.5% decline in students age 40+ since 2014, a loss of over 1500 students in this age group. 40+ age students represented 19% of total students five years prior; currently they represent 7%.

Asian students have shown the greatest percentage increase (11%) in the past five years while White students have shown the greatest decline (also 11%).

The percentage of students enrolled in evening classes has remained fairly constant for the past five years. However, in Fall 2008, when headcount was at its most recent peak, over 2500 more students (28% of total enrollments) were in evening classes than were enrolled in Fall 2018, when only 11% of enrollments were in evening classes.

The percentage of students enrolled full time has increased 11% in the past three years (29% to 40%).

Continuing students comprise 69% of the student body, up from 54% in Fall 2014; by comparison, only 39% of students in Fall 2006 were continuing. Conversely, in 2014, 29% of students were first time or first time transfer; in 2018 that rate is only 15%.

Students enrolling already in possession of a baccalaureate degree are up 55% (940 to 608) of what they were in 2015 and have increased from 6% to 11% of the student body, yet in 2012 baccalaureate students represented 12% of the student body.

Conversely, students entering right from high school have remained at the 77% level they were in 2017—but are up 11% compared to 2012.

There is a slow, but constant, decline in the percentage of students who are U.S. citizens. Notably, there are also 54 fewer international students enrolled with a student visa—down 1% of total enrollment compared to 2017FA.

Citizenship Status Fall 2014 Fall 2015


U.S. Citizen 9,340 84% 8,263 83% 7,835 82% 7,366 81% 6,946 81%

Permanent Resident 1,061 10% 961 10% 977 10% 914 10% 896 10%

Temporary Resident 11 0% 10 0% 17 0% 22 0% 21 0%

Refugee/Asylee 72 1% 76 1% 64 1% 54 1% 63 1%

Student Visa 348 3% 355 4% 392 4% 425 5% 371 4%

Uncollected/Unreported 233 2% 172 3% 270 3% 275 3% 269 4%

Total 11,065 9,937 9,555 9,056 8,566

Fall 2018Fall 2016

Fall Headcount Frequency and Percentage Distribution by Citizenship Status

Fall 2017

38


39



Student Success

40


Background and Demographics: Student Success

Award Type 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018

Associate of Arts Degree 536 688 647 618 674

Associate in Arts for Transfer 38 104 122 141 160

Associate of Science Degree 106 98 91 102 112

Associate in Science for Transfer 5 49 84 119 131

Total Degrees awarded 685 939 944 980 1,077

Certificate of Achievement 33 61 51 49 66

Certificate of Accomplishment 788 372 446 499 565

Total Awards 1,506 1,372 1,441 1,528 1,708

Program Awards

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

569 545

685

939 944980

1077

178

271

821

433497

548631

747816

1506

13721441

1528

1708

Program Awards

Degrees Awarded Certificates Awarded Total Awards

41


In the past five years, the number of degrees awarded has increased 57.2%, and the number of Chancellor’s Office-approved certificates awarded has increased by 100%. The number of Associate Degrees for Transfer (ADTs) has increased dramatically, up 41.3% in just the past two years. ADTs now constitute over 27% of awarded degrees; four years ago the rate was 6%. With the beginning of the completions project at the college, certificate awards jumped dramatically in 2013-14, but fell in 2014-15. The jump was attributable to capturing for the first time multiple years of students who had earned a certificate. Going forward the project only captures a single year of students each reporting year. However, the 2017-18 certificate number outpaces years prior to 2013-14 by over 100% and is 46% higher than the earliest comparable year of 2014-15. Transfer:

Ohlone College Students Transferring to Campuses of the University of California and California State University

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

University of California, Berkeley

29 27 33 29 32 47

University of California, Davis 66 63 47 46 72 70

University of California, Irvine 12 14 16 11 18 21

University of California, Los Angeles

21 19 17 21 28 24

University of California, San Diego

19 33 23 28 27 34

University of California, Santa Barbara

21 15 16 12 14 17

Other Universities of California

36 14 14 27 20 30

UC Totals 204 185 166 174 211 243

California State University, East Bay

165 180 214 161 168 178

San José State University 92 154 145 148 183 180

San Francisco State University

67 86 59 49 28 48

California State University, Sacramento

21 21 23 11 19 13

Other California State Universities

58 67 46 72 47 38

CSU Totals 403 508 487 441 445 457

Total UC/CSU Transfers 607 693 653 615 656 700

42


Transfers to In-State Private Universities and Out of State Universities

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17

In-State Private Universities 117 152 143 119 79 65 49

Out of State Universities 96 93 95 138 137 144 121

Transfer to the University of California campuses increased 15% in 2017-18. University of California, Davis has emerged over the past several years as the most popular destination for Ohlone students transferring to the UC system. Transfer to California State University campuses declined in 2015-16 compared to the high in 2013-14 and 2014-15. The 2017-18 transfers to CSU are up slightly over the prior year, but not yet back to the 2013-14 high. Transfer to in-state private and out-of-state universities fell below 200 for the first time, continuing a consistent downward trend. This may be attributable, in part, to the demise of the for-profit transfer opportunities; transfers to University of Phoenix, for example, have declined 86% (from 37 to 5) since 2008.

43


Completions In the recently released 2018 Student Success Scorecard, a statewide measure of performance indicators and accountability, measures were developed to track student progress and achievement among the California community colleges by the CCC Chancellor’s Office. One measure was the percentage of first-time students who showed intent to complete and who achieved any of the following outcomes within six years: transferred to a four-year college; or earned an AA/AS; or earned a certificate of 18 or more units; or achieved “transfer directed” or “transfer prepared” status. By this measure, Ohlone was ranked among the top performing colleges statewide, 3.3% above the peer group average, 7.1% above the Bay 10 average, and 10.8% above the average for all California community colleges. The college completion rate is 2% above the 2016 rate, but about 2% below the 2017 rate.

Peer Colleges Rate

All Students Af-Amer Hispanic Nat Amer

Moorpark 64.0% 51.5% 55.7% *50.0%

DeAnza 63.5% 42.7% 47.2% *100.00%

Diablo Valley 62.0% 47.7% 53.0% *25.0%

Santa Barbara City 62.0% 53.3% 50.9% *40.0%

Orange Coast 60.9% 40.8% 49.6% 38.5%

Ohlone 59.0% 51.8% 51.3% NA

Las Positas 57.4% 47.1% 49.9% *0.0%

Golden West 56.0% 46.4% 47.2% *50.0%

Mira Costa 55.9% 47.2% 48.5% *50.0%

Pasadena City 55.9% 36.7% 46.2% *100.0%

Peer Average 55.7% 45.6% 47.4% 46.8%

San Diego Mesa 54.5% 40.0% 47.1% 66.7%

Fullerton 53.4% 51.7% 45.9% *55.6%

Skyline 52.6% 50.0% 38.6% *0.0%

LA Pierce 52.0% 45.6% 42.9% *66.7%

Sierra 50.8% 44.1% 50.9% 35.3%

College of Alameda 50.3% 30.8% 46.7% NA

Cuesta 50.2% 61.5% 44.4% *33.3%

Folsom Lake 50.0% 42.9% 48.0% *37.5%

CCC Average 48.2% 36.9% 41.6% 35.1%

Santa Monica 47.8% 33.9% 36.0% *28.6%

44


Completion of 30 Units The same report measured the percentage of first-time students who showed intent to complete and who earned at least 30 units while in the California Community College system. By this measure, Ohlone ranked fifth among 32 peer colleges, and Ohlone students were 4.4% above the statewide average, 4.1% above the Bay 10 average, and 7.3% above students at peer colleges. However, in 2016, the college had a rate 1.4% higher that was the leading rate among peer colleges.

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Standard

Benchmark

Statewide Average

Bay 10 Average

Peer Average

Ohlone College

57.0%

59.7%

48.2%

51.9%

55.7%

59.0%

2018 Scorecard College Performance Indicators -Completions

45


Peer Colleges Rate


Irvine Valley 80.8% 82.5% 77.9% *100.0%

Las Positas 75.7% 79.4% 72.3% *25.0%

San Diego Miramar 75.1% 62.3% 69.5% *100.0%

Santiago Canyon 75.0% 76.9% 71.4% *0.0%

Ohlone 74.0% 69.6% 73.4% NA

Cuyamaca 73.9% 70.0% 69.7% *100.0%

Mission 71.3% 72.5% 68.8% *100.0%

Monterey Peninsula 70.5% 60.0% 75.8% *60.0%

Skyline 70.2% 50.0% 65.1% *33.3%

Evergreen Valley 69.9% 50.0% 63.0% *75.0%

Napa Valley 69.9% 61.9% 71.2% *50.0%

CCC Average 69.6% 58.7% 67.4% 58.7%


Allan Hancock 67.6% 52.4% 66.9% *57.1%

Laney 67.2% 60.2% 61.4% *0.0%

Hartnell 66.9% 67.7% 66.3% *50.0%

LA Mission 66.9% 58.8% 64.8% *66.7%

Peer Average 66.7% 60.4% 66.4% 51.9%

Los Medanos 66.6% 61.9% 66.7% *50.0%

Gavilan 66.2% 66.7% 62.3% *66.7%

Columbia 66.0% *60.0% 69.0% 40.0%

San Jose City 65.8% 64.2% 62.8% *60.0%

Oxnard 65.6% 68.8% 65.5% *0.0%

Berkeley City 65.1% 51.6% 72.6% *100.0%

Mendocino 63.7% 60.0% 65.8% 52.4%

Contra Costa 63.6% 55.6% 63.9% *0.0%

Merritt 62.8% 58.9% 65.4% *100.0%

Southwest LA 62.6% 58.0% 67.3% *0.0%

West LA 60.5% 56.0% 61.6% *50.0%

Cerro Coso 60.4% 26.7% 62.2% *75.0%

College of the Siskiyous 58.8% 66.7% 75.5% 71.4%

San Diego City 58.7% 55.8% 58.9% *50.0%

Barstow 56.2% 48.8% 60.0% *0.0%

Lassen 49.3% 47.2% 38.8% 43.8%

46


0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Standard

Benchmark

Statewide Average

Bay 10 Average

Peer Average

Ohlone College

70.0%

72.0%

69.6%

69.9%

66.7%

74.0%

2018 Scorecard College Performance Indicators -

Completion of 30 Units

47


Persistence Ohlone ranked seventh among peers in persistence (re-enrollment) rate, a decline of 0.9% in 2016, but in 2016 the college rate was highest among statewide peers. The 2018 rate is 2.7% above peers, 5.6% above the Bay 10, and 3.0% above the statewide average. This is an area where peer and Bay 10 colleges are improving while Ohlone has declined.

Peer Colleges Rate


Irvine Valley 82.6% 80.0% 83.5% *100.0%

Las Positas 82.5% 82.4% 83.7% *75.0%

West Valley 81.6% 80.5% 79.7% *50.0%

Moorpark 81.2% 72.7% 81.5% *50.0%

Diablo Valley 81.2% 71.6% 79.1% *100.0%

Saddleback 80.0% 69.4% 78.8% *77.8%

Ohlone 79.5% 83.9% 77.2% NA

College of the Canyons 77.9% 72.5% 76.1% *83.3%

Peer Average 76.8% 73.9% 75.7% 60.0%

CCC Average 76.5% 71.8% 75.7% 68.6%

College of Marin 75.9% 88.0% 77.1% 60.0%

Evergreen Valley 75.8% 73.7% 69.9% *75.0%

De Anza 75.2% 65.6% 69.1% *100.0%

San Jose City 75.2% 75.8% 73.0% *100.0%

San Mateo 73.6% 77.1% 75.8% NA

Mission 73.2% 70.0% 77.0% *100.0%

Gavilan 71.3% 72.2% 70.1% *88.9%

Canada 70.0% 59.1% 69.9% *100.0%

Foothill 69.5% 61.7% 65.7% *50.0%

48


One notable area where the college excelled was in the rate of remedial math students who ultimately succeeded in a transfer level math course. In remedial math, Ohlone students continue to perform at rates that are first among peers and first in the Bay 10; in fact, Ohlone has the highest rate among all California Community Colleges on this metric. In remedial English, students perform at rates fifth among peers and more than 5% above both the Bay 10 and statewide averages. However, the 2018 remedial English improvement rate for the college is down 6.6% from the 2016 rate of 60.8% when the college was also first among peers in this indicator.

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Standard

Benchmark

Statewide Average

Bay 10 Average

Peer Average

Ohlone College

66.0%

75.0%

76.5%

73.9%

76.8%

79.5%

2018 Scorecard College Performance Indicators -Persistence

49


Remedial Math Improvement

Peer Colleges Rate


Ohlone 55.8% 53.6% 53.3% *0.0%

Berkeley City 49.0% 35.4% 53.1% *40.0%

Cuyamaca 45.5% 47.8% 43.8% *0.0%

Folsom Lake 43.9% 20.0% 43.3% *16.7

San Diego Mesa 40.3% 27.0% 37.1% 50.0%

Diablo Valley 40.0% 25.4% 36.4% *44.4%

Southwest LA 39.9% 34.8% 45.5% NA

Allan Hancock 39.1% 43.5% 35.4% *28.6%

Cuesta 38.5% 30.0% 32.7% *20.0%

College of Alameda 37.4% 28.3% 34.9% *0.0%

CCC Average 36.5% 22.1% 35.6% 27.6%

San Diego Miramar 36.4% 19.1% 33.3% *16.7%

Peer Average 36.0% 25.9% 35.7% 28.9%

Los Medanos 35.8% 25.0% 38.1% *22.2%

Laney 35.7% 26.1% 31.4% *50.0%

Ventura 35.5% 23.7% 35.1% *33.3%

Chabot 34.7% 19.1% 34.6% *50.0%

El Camino 33.5% 21.3% 35.1% *20.0%

American River 33.0% 15.1% 31.1% 26.7%

Contra Costa 32.7% 23.0% 34.7% *50.0%

Cerritos 32.5% 24.0% 32.6% *33.3%

Merritt 31.0% 26.9% 31.6% *0.0%

Santa Monica City 30.6% 15.6% 29.9% *0.0%

LA Harbor 29.0% 14.3% 31.0% *25.0%

San Diego City 24.3% 15.8% 24.9% 10.0%

Compton 23.7% 17.2% 29.8% *20.0%

West LA 21.7% 16.3% 24.3% *66.7%

50


0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Standard

Benchmark

Statewide Average

Bay 10 Average

Peer Average

Ohlone College

45.0%

51.1%

36.5%

39.6%

36.0%

55.8%


Remedial Math Improvement

51


Remedial English Improvement

Peer Colleges Rate


Diablo Valley 61.8% 47.7% 58.6% *40.0%

Cuyamaca 56.9% 48.1% 50.8% *25.0%

San Diego Mesa 56.0% 51.7% 52.6% *57.1%

Chabot 55.8% 43.4% 50.4% *100.0%

Ohlone 54.2% 41.6% 48.6% NA

Ventura 54.0% 30.6% 54.4% *100.0%

Cuesta 52.6% 28.6% 43.6% 20.0%

Folsom Lake 52.3% 26.1% 50.3% *57.1%

San Diego Miramar 52.2% 40.4% 47.8% NA

El Camino 51.7% 34.9% 53.2% *33.3%

Cerritos 51.5% 43.8% 50.6% *0.0%

LA Harbor 50.8% 43.5% 49.8% *25.0%

American River 49.5% 33.0% 46.6% 44.0%

CCC Average 48.7% 32.3% 47.6% 34.4%

Santa Monica City 48.4% 33.3% 49.4% *16.7%

Peer Average 46.8%

San Diego City 46.7% 36.8% 47.2% *57.1%

Los Medanos 45.8% 34.3% 48.2% *25.0

Allan Hancock 43.6% 13.0% 44.8% *40.0%

Berkeley City 40.7% 23.6% 44.2% *0.0%

Southwest LA 39.6% 35.6% 45.9% NA

Contra Costa 37.4% 25.9% 43.1% *0.0%

Compton 36.2% 28.1% 44.4% *50.0%

College of Alameda 35.8% 19.6% 41.7% *50.0%

West LA 33.7% 25.7% 42.5% *50.0%

Merritt 33.0% 25.9% 38.2% *33.3%

Laney 29.3% 25.3% 30.5% *0.0%

52


0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Standard

Benchmark

Statewide Average

Bay 10 Average

Peer Average

Ohlone College

51.0%

57.0%

48.7%

49.3%

46.8%

54.2%


Remedial English Improvement

53


Vocational Course Completion Vocational course completion rate is an area where the college has newly excelled. The current rate is fifth among statewide peers, a marked improvement from the rates that were below both statewide and peer group averages just two years prior. It should also be noted that the vocational completion rate for the college’s Hispanic students is the highest rate (by more than 5%) of all peer colleges.

Peer Colleges Rate

All Students

Af-Amer Hispanic Nat Amer

Mt. San Antonio 63.6% 59.8% 61.0% *50.0%

Sierra 62.8% 56.5% 61.5% *80.0%

East LA 58.0% 56.4% 56.1% *25.0%

Las Positas 57.9% 46.7% 58.8% *33.3%

Ohlone 57.8% 28.6% 66.7% *0.0%

MiraCosta 57.3% 63.2% 58.1% *20.0%

San Jose City 55.3% 55.0% 50.2% *100.0%

CCC Average 55.1% 47.0% 54.6% 52.0%

Cerritos 54.8% 46.4% 54.4% *44.4%

Skyline 54.4% 61.1% 50.0% *0.0%


Peer Average 52.9% 47.2% 53.1% 51.6%

San Mateo 52.9% 38.7% 57.9% NA

Palomar 52.2% 61.5% 49.8% 60.0%

Cabrillo 51.8% *22.2% 52.4% 41.7%

Cosumnes River 51.2% 40.2% 50.5% *37.5%

Chabot 50.9% 44.2% 45.0% *50.0%

San Bernardino 50.3% 51.9% 51.3% *60.0%

San Diego Miramar 49.8% 46.0% 49.4% 54.5%

Hartnell 48.7% 43.8% 54.6% *0.0%

American River 48.6% 38.6% 49.7% 50.0%

LA Trade Tech 47.9% 44.3% 50.7% *85.7%

Long Beach City 47.1% 29.4% 50.1% *50.0%

City College of San Francisco 46.4% 33.1% 46.8% *25.0%

Foothill 43.0% 42.3% 41.5% *50.0%

54


0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Standard

Benchmark

Statewide Average

Bay 10 Average

Peer Average

Ohlone College

42.3%

49.4%

55.1%

53.1%

52.9%

57.8%


Vocational Completion

55


ESL Improvement ESL improvement is an area where the college is below the statewide average—by 5.2% in 2018 compared to 14.2% in 2013. The college ESL improvement rate of 28.2% is up 6% in the past two years and is now less than 1% below the peer average (but 5% below the statewide average). Ohlone is hampered in this indicator because the college’s ESL curriculum is designed to place students in mainstream English courses earlier than is the case at some other colleges, and that may impede the continuity of learning for some ESL students.

Peer Colleges

Rate

Santa Monica City 54.1%

Berkeley City 49.5%

San Diego Mesa 45.6%

Cerritos 44.1%

San Diego City 43.5%

El Camino 38.2%

San Diego Miramar 37.6%

LA Harbor 37.5%

American River 34.9%

CCC Average 33.4%

Laney 30.5%

Peer Average 29.0%

Cuyamaca 28.5%

College of Alameda 28.3%

Ohlone 28.2%

Contra Costa 28.0%

Allan Hancock 25.9%

Los Medanos 24.3%

Diablo Valley 23.9%

Southwest LA 23.3%

Chabot 22.1%

West LA 20.2%

Folsom Lake 19.4%

Compton 17.2%

Ventura 7.7%

Merritt 6.4%

Cuesta 6.0%

56


0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Standard

Benchmark

Statewide Average

Bay 10 Average

Peer Average

Ohlone College

19.0%

24.8%

33.4%

29.9%

29.0%

28.2%


ESL Improvement

57


Retention and Success Rates: Retention measures the percent of students who were enrolled in a class at census and subsequently completed the course. Success measures the percentage of those students retained who received a grade of A, B, C, or Pass.

Compared to the statewide average for all 114 community colleges, Ohlone’s retention rate had been below the state rate for five of the past seven years, but in 2018FA the rate exceeded the statewide average. In the past seven years, however, the success rate has consistently surpassed the statewide average. The College’s 75.7% success rate for 2018FA is the highest achieved. The low retention rate may be due, in part, to a college practice of faculty proactively dropping students who are not doing well. This reduces retention but results in fewer students getting substandard grades. It does not affect success rates, though.

84.6% 85.0%

86.8%

85.8%

87.5%

86.3%

87.7%86.6% 86.5%

86.0%

86.2%

86.5%

86.6%86.9%

71.3%72.3%

74.1% 73.2%

75.6%74.6%

75.7%

70.0% 69.6% 69.2% 69.7% 70.4% 70.9% 71.1%

50.0%

55.0%

60.0%

65.0%

70.0%

75.0%

80.0%

85.0%

90.0%

95.0%

100.0%

Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Fall 2016 Fall 2017 Fall 2018

Ohlone Retention and Success Rates Compared to Statewide Average

Ohlone Retention Rates State Retention Rates Ohlone Success Rates State Success Rates

58


Typically, community college students take more time to complete a degree than university students. Ohlone’s course-taking patterns and time-to-degree numbers are aligned with community colleges across the state. The average time-to-degree for all students (which includes the long-term casual student) is nine semesters. This is true for both AA/AS degrees and for ADTs. However, the mode—most common time-to-degree—for both AA/AS and ADT is six semesters. Ten percent of graduates finished in two years; 34% finished in three years. The average accumulated units at graduation also reflects a statewide community college trend. Although 60 units are the minimum required number of units for graduation in most majors, 87 is the current statewide average, about half again more than is needed. Much of this excess is due to the remedial courses most students have had to take before beginning degree-applicable math and English courses. In 2014FA, for example, 57% of students (excluding consortium and dual enrollment students) took an average of four basic skills courses each. In 2018FA, with the advent of AB705 and the reduction of basic skills requisites, 47% of enrolled students had taken a basic skills course and each student averaged only three basic skills courses on their academic record. It is expected that progressively students will take fewer non-degree-applicable courses and will, therefore, accumulate less units on their way to a degree. Currently, Ohlone’s average accumulated units is somewhat

Start Term

Semesters

enrolled Graduates

Semesters

enrolled Graduates

2017FA* 2 5 2 1

2017SP 3 5 3 1

2016FA 4 56 4 19

2016SP 5 36 5 5

2015FA 6 119 6 61

2015SP 7 22 7 9

2014FA 8 101 8 45

2014SP 9 13 9 3

2013FA 10 68 10 28

2013SP 11 13 11 4

2012FA 12 47 12 23

2012SP 13 5 13 1

2011FA 14 33 14 12

2011SP 15 5 15 1

2010FA 16 25 16 10

2010SP 17 2 17 3

2009FA 18 20 18 7

2009SP 19 5 19 1

2008FA 20 11 20 1

Before 2008FA 21+ 62 21+ 19

*Also includes students starting prior summer for all Fall semesters

2017-18 Graduates with Time to Degree

ADTsAll AA/AS

59


higher, but part of that may be due to the high unit requirements of health science majors. The average degree-applicable, transferable units accumulated is appropriate, but the health science majors numbers seem low—below the required 60 units. This is likely because students must complete numerous prerequisite courses before being admitted into a health science major, and generally those prerequisite units are earned at a college other than Ohlone.

Average Accumulated Units at Graduation

All units Transferable units @ Ohlone

All Degrees 96.3 69.3

All ADTs 92.4 74.6

Health Sciences 140.9 56.7

AA/AS's less Health Sciences 91.5 70.7

60


61



Course Offerings

62


Background and Demographics: Course Offerings

FTES per section reflects fill rate on courses and is a measure of efficiency. By this measure the college has had a higher proportion of unfilled classes compared to highs in 2013-14. Weekly Student Contact Hours (WSCH), Full Time Equivalent Faculty (FTEF), and Efficiency

Total 2018FA WSCH decreased slightly compared to 2017FA.

Total 2018FA FTEF decreased by 6.0% from 2017FA, resulting in a WSCH/FTEF increase from 498 to 508.

Twenty-five departments (many of them with small programs) had WSCH gains over 2017FA.

Conversely, seven departments witnessed WSCH drops approximating 20%, including Deaf Studies (DEAF), Interpreter Preparation (INT), Kinesiology (KIN), and Early Childhood Studies (ECS).

50% of the total WSCH is produced by the top seven departments.

Although there was some shuffling, nine of the top ten departments for the past five years remain the top ten producers of WSCH for 2018FA. Only Computer Science is new to the top ten, replacing ASL from the 2014FA list.

The top ten FTEF rankings have remained relatively constant over the past five years, albeit with some minimal shuffling—again, Computer Studies has replaced American Sign Language.

The Top 10 producers of WSCH account for 62.9% of the total WSCH.

The Top 10 FTEF departments account for 54.7% of the total FTEF. With an average load efficiency of 509, 19 departments are above the average, while 35

departments are below the average WSCH/FTEF; only 16 departments have a load efficiency above 525, the efficiency benchmark.

2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-17 2017-18

Summer 4.07 3.14 3.58 3.64 3.56

Fall 3.29 3.18 3.13 3.18 3.12

Spring 3.22 3.06 3.19 3.08 2.88

Average FTES Produced Per Section Taught

63


# Sections WSCH FTES FTEF WSCH/FTEF # Sections WSCH FTES FTEF WSCH/FTEF

Business and Technology

BA 36 5032 147 8.53 590 35 5132 148 8.20 626

BSM 4 201 6 0.80 251 3 173 5 0.60 289

CAOT 3 202 6 0.40 512 2 135 4 0.22 605

CNET 25 2028 62 5.30 383 24 2155 66 5.70 378

CS 27 4548 137 7.47 609 26 4727 144 7.76 609

RE 3 394 11 0.60 657 4 350 10 0.80 438

Division total/average 98 12404 369 23.09 537 94 12673 377 23.28 544


Counseling and Student Success

PD 17 1068 30 2.27 471 19 1271 36 2.51 506



Deaf Studies

ASL 22 2731 79 6.29 434 17 2411 67 4.95 487

DEAF 15 613 19 3.00 204 7 372 12 1.47 254

INT 13 496 15 2.26 219 12 350 11 2.21 158



Health Sciences

AH 3 408 11 0.67 611 3 386 11 0.67 579

NUR 15 1894 51 9.73 195 13 1756 47 6.81 258

PTA 9 974 29 2.75 355 9 999 29 2.28 439

RT 10 861 25 3.32 259 10 887 25 3.26 272



Kinesiology, Athletics, and Arts

ART 41 3861 116 9.16 422 38 3784 56 8.80 430

ATHL 18 2027 62 4.14 489 20 2195 68 4.66 471

GA 4 537 17 1.20 448 4 576 18 1.20 480

HLTH 7 688 19 1.33 516 8 789 22 1.54 512

ID 4 186 6 0.86 217 5 217 7 0.86 253

KIN 9 727 21 1.34 541 8 541 16 1.14 473

MM 11 1079 34 2.87 376 14 944 29 2.59 364

MUS 30 1818 54 5.74 317 34 2004 60 5.77 347

PE 28 1483 46 3.91 379 22 1365 42 3.26 419

TD 27 1907 58 6.39 298 29 2542 77 7.28 349



Language, Communication, and Academic Success

BRDC 14 476 15 2.37 201 11 554 17 1.73 320

COMM 50 4474 133 11.22 399 47 4354 129 10.80 403

ENGL 126 19817 612 27.84 712 99 16349 504 23.22 704

ESL 14 2021 61 4.67 433 13 1787 56 4.20 425

Foreign Language 10 1535 47 3.92 391 11 1717 42 4.19 410

JOUR 2 101 3 0.48 212 3 139 4 0.48 293

LS 2 66 2 0.13 498 2 60 2 0.13 447



Social Sciences

AJ 6 511 16 1.20 426 7 558 17 1.40 399

CHS 5 565 16 1.00 565 7 768 23 1.40 548

CFS 6 774 22 1.20 645 5 593 17 1.00 593

ECS 14 965 29 2.80 345 13 795 24 2.73 291

ENVS 7 792 23 1.54 513 8 963 28 1.74 553

GEOG 8 1053 32 2.08 507 9 1189 36 2.28 522

HIST 32 4257 128 6.80 626 30 3594 107 6.27 574

IS 2 251 8 0.80 314 1 76 2 0.20 380

PHIL 9 761 23 1.80 423 8 727 22 1.60 455

PS 9 1053 31 1.80 585 12 1342 40 2.40 559

PSY 23 3404 103 5.00 681 25 3454 104 5.40 639

SOC 13 1981 59 3.00 660 14 1971 58 3.20 616

WS 2 194 5 0.40 485 1 116 3 0.20 578



Science, Engineering, and Mathematics

ANTH 15 1580 48 3.31 477 11 1305 40 2.63 496

ASTR 1 91 3 0.20 456 3 251 8 0.54 462

BIOL 29 5622 175 9.20 611 28 5102 159 8.93 571

BIOT 13 473 15 2.03 233 11 444 14 1.91 233

CHEM 27 5079 158 8.77 579 29 5475 170 9.52 575

ENGI 7 920 29 1.86 495 9 1037 32 2.34 443

GEOL 5 481 14 1.29 374 4 514 15 1.09 474

MATH 108 18865 583 31.20 605 95 18118 559 28.26 641

PHYS 15 1944 61 4.50 432 14 1943 61 4.38 444


College Total 955 115869 3516 232.73 498 896 111355 3303 218.73 509

Excludes consortium and zero-loaded dual enrollment

2018FA2017FA

WSCH, FTES, and FTEF by Division

64


Top 10

Top 10 Producers of WSCH Top 10 Producers of WSCH

2014FA 2018FA

English 24,610 Mathematics 18,118

Mathematics 17,753 English 16,349

Biological Science 5,862 Chemistry 5,475

History 4,770 Business Administration 5,132

Speech/Communication 4,676 Biological Science 5,102

Business Administration 4,659 Computer Studies 4,727

American Sign Language 4,107 Speech/Communication 4,354

Chemistry 4,099 Art 3,784

Art 3,807 History 3,594

Psychology 3,078

Psychology 3,454

Top 10 FTEF Top 10 FTEF

2014FA 2018FA

English 31.00 Mathematics 28.26

Mathematics 29.76 English 23.22

Speech/Communication 11.89 Speech/Communication 10.80

Biological Science 8.97 Chemistry 9.52

Nursing 7.95 Biological Science 8.93

Art 7.69 Art 8.80

Business Administration 7.60 Business Administration 8.20

American Sign Language 7.01 Computer Studies 7.76

Chemistry 6.96 Theater & Dance 7.28

Theater & Dance 6.83 Nursing 6.81

Top 10 Most Efficient Top 10 Most Efficient

2014FA 2018FA

English 794 English 704

Kinesiology 735 Psychology 639

History 708 Business Administration 626

Personal Development 680 Sociology 616

Psychology 679 Computer Science 609

Sociology 671 Consumer Family Science 593

Geography 666 Allied Health 579

Biological Science 653 Chemistry 575

Consumer Family Science 645 History 574

Business Administration Biological Science 571

*Minimum 10 FTES *Minimum 10 FTES

65


Changes in department WSCH, FTEF, and efficiency over five years Since 2007, community colleges in general, and Ohlone College specifically, have had to adapt course offerings and enrollment expectations. The intervening years were characterized by a statewide fiscal crisis and various responses to that crisis by the governor, the legislature, and the Community Colleges’ Chancellor’s Office. Budgets were cut, enrollments were mandated to be reduced, revisions to Title 5 limited course repetition, courses offered for personal enrichment were discouraged or were no longer a priority—all of which impacted the number of course offerings, the numbers of students that could enroll, and the number of faculty that could be hired. Dramatic changes to WSCH, FTEF, and WSCH/FTEF efficiency were to be expected. With the recent passage of AB705, and its impact on colleges’ basic skills offerings; a strong economy that encourages more students to enter the workforce rather than attend college full time; the Vision for Success goals and the Student Centered Funding Formula that reward districts with low income student populations at the expense of colleges in more affluent districts, even more dramatic changes are to be expected. Despite an 16% overall decline in WSCH since 2010FA, 15 departments saw more than 10% growth in WSCH over what was reported in 2010FA. Conversely, 11 departments saw declines to WSCH in excess of 50% over the same period. The larger departments (1000+ WSCH) that managed to grow in the face of overall declining enrollment included Engineering, Math, Chemistry, Personal Development, Physics, Sociology, Political Science, and Computer Science. Math, Chemistry, and Computer Science added more than 1000+ WSCH over the 2010FA enrollments. Declines of 1000+ WSCH occurred within five departments—American Sign Language, Computer Networks and Emerging Technology, English, Physical Education, and Theatre and Dance--as well as within the combined foreign languages. Curiously, FTEF in 2018FA was only 3% less than in 2010FA. This, of course, means that efficiency measures (WSCH/FTEF) were lower in 2018FA. The benchmark number for efficiency is 525. In 2010FA, sections were taught with a 586 WSCH/FTEF ratio; in 2018FA that number fell to 509. Contrary to the trend, five larger departments had both a minimum 525 ratio and a gain over 2010FA of at least 10% in WSCH/FTEF. Those departments are Math, Chemistry, Sociology, Political Science, and Computer Science.

66


Chicano Studies 277.4%

Computer Science 65.4%

Engineering 65.2%

Political Science 60.9%

Physics 60.7%

Allied Health 56.8%

Environmental Studies 44.4%

Chemistry 33.6%

Graphic Arts 26.9%

Athletics 14.7%

*Minimum 10 FTES

Deaf Studies -49.6%

American Sign Language -41.3%

Biotechnology -41.0%

Administration of Justice -38.4%

Kinesiology -35.6%

Philosophy -33.6%

English -33.6%

Anthropology -28.4%

History -24.7%

Physical Education -24.1%

*Minimum 10 FTES

Greatest Gains in WSCH

2014FA-2018FA

Greatest Losses in WSCH

2014FA-2018FA

67



Community Colleges

68


Background and Demographics: Community Colleges

One way to assess the success of college programs and services is to compare the college to others involved in the same tasks. Two primary sources of comparison exist within the data of the Chancellor’s Office of the California Community Colleges and within the 2018 Student Success Scorecard. Through the Chancellor’s Office’s DataMart, data can be extracted for our geographic peers, those 21 community colleges that comprise the Bay 10 Districts. From the Scorecard, data can be compared to those community colleges that are determined to be peers on the basis of uncontrollable, relevant factors that affect each outcome that is compared.

Annual headcount enrollment of the Bay 10 community colleges shows Ohlone to be a mid-sized college in the Bay Area, ranking seventh in size. Four colleges have an annual enrollment of 25,000 or more. Ohlone is among the middle eleven colleges with an enrollment between 12,000-20,000. Six colleges have enrollment below 12,000. Since 2010-11, Ohlone has seen a decline in annual

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,00039,222

31,23430,034

28,562

19,255

17,91515,035

14,72314,500

14,241

14,00013,952

13,59012,956

12,639

11,45911,041

10,57910,371

9,9129,564

Bay 10 Annual Headcount Enrollment 2017-2018

69


headcount enrollment of 15.2%. Comparing full time equivalent students (FTES) rather than headcount students, Ohlone is the seventh largest within the Bay 10. There are four colleges with FTES above 10,000. Ohlone is among those seven colleges with FTES between 7000-10,000, and there are ten colleges with FTES between below 7000. Between 2010-11 and 2015-16, Ohlone’s FTES declined by 4.3%. Ohlone’s 7.5% gain in 2015-16 FTES over 2014-15 was the highest growth rate in the Bay 10; however, FTES have declined in the past two years by 5.5%, consistent with FTES declines among two-thirds of the Bay 10 colleges. In fall 2018, Ohlone’s percentage of students enrolled full time (12 units or more) was 40.0%. This is a rate second highest among the Bay 10.

FTES Growth 2015-16 to 2017-18

2015-16 2017-18 % Change

Merritt 4,459 4,777 7.1%

Evergreen Valley 6,272 6,690 6.7%

Las Positas 6,729 7,037 4.6%

San Francisco 15,667 16,310 4.1%

San Jose City 5,752 5,917 2.9%

Skyline 8,479 8,675 2.3%

Chabot 9,680 9,817 1.4%

Diablo Valley 17,353 17,278 -0.4%

Contra Costa 5,057 4,989 -1.3%

Canada 4,646 4,523 -2.6%

Los Medanos 8,025 7,738 -3.6%

Marin 3,615 3,443 -4.8%

San Mateo 8,367 7,942 -5.1%

Ohlone 9,001 8,505 -5.5%

Foothill 13,329 12,200 -8.5%

Laney 8,011 7,292 -9.0%

Alameda 4,140 3,767 -9.0%

Berkeley City 4,888 4,370 -10.6%

DeAnza 19,242 17,178 -10.7%

West Valley 6,848 5,983 -12.6%

Mission 6,269 5,278 -15.8%

70


The statewide Student Centered Funding Formula includes as one of its award metrics the number of students who receive Pell Grants or California Promise Grants. As is true for several Bay Area community colleges, Ohlone has a very low rate—and number—of students receiving financial aid. The statewide rate for Pell Grants is 18.5%, with a 40.6% average rate of Promise Grants awarded.

2017-18

Enrollment

2017-18 Pell

Recipients Pell Rate

2017-18 Promise

Grant Recipients

Promise

Rate

Alameda 10,371 1,375 13.3% 5,700 55.0%

Berkeley City 11,041 1,476 13.4% 4,682 42.4%

Canada 9,564 804 8.4% 4,567 47.8%

Chabot 19,255 3,055 15.9% 8,382 43.5%

Contra Costa 10,579 1,959 18.5% 4,986 47.1%

DeAnza 30,034 4,173 13.9% 9,286 30.9%

Diablo Valley 28,562 3,908 13.7% 9,527 33.4%

Evergreen Valley 14,500 3,093 21.3% 6,831 47.1%

Foothill 31,234 1,558 5.0% 5,678 18.2%

Laney 17,915 3,116 17.4% 8,466 47.3%

Las Positas 12,639 1,570 12.4% 3,983 31.5%

Los Medanos 12,956 2,973 22.9% 6,396 49.4%

Marin 9,912 903 9.1% 2,106 21.2%

Merritt 11,459 1,575 13.7% 5,418 47.3%

Mission 13,952 1,592 11.4% 3,476 24.9%

Ohlone 15,035 1,611 10.7% 3,773 25.1%

San Francisco 39,222 4,050 10.3% 12,549 32.0%

San Jose City 14,241 1,820 12.8% 5,946 41.8%

San Mateo 14,000 1,129 8.1% 4,735 33.8%

Skyline 14,723 1,678 11.4% 5,794 39.4%

West Valley 13,590 1,168 8.6% 2,623 19.3%

Bay 10 Students Receiving Financial Aid

71


Comparing measures of completion among those 21 colleges in the Bay 10 districts, Ohlone ranks fourth in the percent of students who graduated with an AA/AS degree during 2017-18. This is an increase from a 12th ranking just five years before. When comparing the percent of students who transferred to a University of California in 2017-18, Ohlone was among the top seven, and was sixth among colleges sending students to a CSU campus. However, using the new Transfer Velocity Rate computation, 57.2% of Ohlone students who show intent to transfer actually do transfer within six years, a rate that is up 7% in the past three years. This transfer velocity rate ranks third among Bay 10 colleges.

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

Bay 10 Percentage of Students Enrolled Full Time 2018FA

72


0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

16.0%

18.0%

20.0%

22.0%

Bay 10 Percentage of Degrees Awarded to Annual FTES 2017-2018

73


0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

55.0%

60.0%

65.0%

Bay 10 Transfer Velocity Rate 2016-2017

74


0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0% 6.6%

5.7%

5.3%

3.8%3.5%

3.3%3.1%

2.8%

2.4%2.2%

2.0% 1.9%1.7% 1.7% 1.6% 1.6%

1.4% 1.3%1.0% 1.0%

0.6%

Bay 10 UC Transfers to Annual FTES 2017-2018

75


Tracking data available for community college students transferring to campuses of the California State University reveal that Ohlone students who entered a CSU in Fall 2017 had a higher GPA (3.18) at the end of the first year at the CSU than the average for all community college students starting at a CSU in Fall 2017 and was second among Bay 10 colleges. Additionally, the persistence rates of Ohlone students at a CSU from Fall 2016 to Fall 2017 was second highest among all Bay 10 colleges.

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

10.0% 9.4%

8.0%7.8%

7.3%

6.7%6.4%

6.1% 6.0% 6.0%5.8%

5.6%5.4%

5.0% 4.9% 4.8%4.6%

4.4%4.2% 4.1%

3.2%

2.7%

Bay 10 CSU Transfer to Annual FTES 2017-2018

76


2.80

2.85

2.90

2.95

3.00

3.05

3.10

3.15

3.20

3.253.24

3.183.16

3.153.14

3.133.12

3.113.10

3.09 3.093.08 3.08

3.07

3.04 3.04 3.043.03

3.013.00

2.972.96

Bay 10 GPA after Transfer to CSU 2017-2018

77


50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

90%89% 89% 89% 89%

88% 88% 88% 88% 88% 88% 88%87% 87% 87% 87%

86% 86%85%

84%

77%76%

Bay 10 Fall-to-fall Persistence after Transfer to CSU 2016-2017

78


79



Staff

80


Background and Demographics: Staff

Employment Status – Total Staff – Fall 2018

Total Staff

Count Percent Statewide Percent

Gender

Male 292 44% 45%

Female 370 56% 55%

Ethnicity

African-American 32 5% 7%

Asian (includes Filipino) 168 25% 11%

Pacific Islander 2 0% 1%

Hispanic 96 15% 20%

Native-American 5 1% 1%

White 307 46% 52%

Multi-Racial 10 2% 1%

Unknown 42 6% 7%

Age

Less than 35 82 12% 15%

35-39 80 12% 12%

40-44 88 13% 12%

45-49 87 12% 13%

50-54 102 15% 13%

55-59 83 13% 13%

60-64 68 10% 11%

65 + 72 11% 12%

81


Employment Status – Non-Faculty – Fall 2018

Total Non-Faculty

Count Percent Statewide Percent

Gender 113 55% 58%

Male 93 45% 42%

Female

Ethnicity




Hispanic 47 23% 29%


White 64 31% 40%


Unknown 16 8% 7%

Age

Less than 35 34 17% 19%

35-39 29 14% 12%

40-44 25 12% 12%

45-49 23 11% 13%

50-54 33 16% 14%

55-59 27 13% 14%

60-64 18 9% 10%

65 + 17 8% 5%

Diversity for total faculty and staff is greater than that of the statewide average. Ohlone has more Asians and less Hispanics than the statewide average. Fifty-four percent of total employees are non-White, above the statewide non-White average of 48%. More dramatically, 69% of managers and classified staff are diverse, 9% above the statewide average.

The percentage of non-faculty that are age 50+ is 46% (up from 39% three years prior); 50% of faculty are age 50+.

82


Ohlone classified staff is no longer younger than the statewide average. In 2014, Ohlone had 35% of staff under the age of 40, compared to the statewide average of 29%; now both average 31%.

There is a higher percentage of female staff than male (56% to 44%) and there are more female staff than the statewide average.

There are almost two and a half times as many Asian classified staff as the statewide average (28% to 12%), but fewer Hispanics (by 6%) and White (by 9%) staff.

83


Employment Status – Faculty – Fall 2018

Faculty

2018FA Count Percent Statewide

Full-time Faculty 124 27% 31%

Adjunct Faculty 332 73% 69%

Total Faculty 456

Total Faculty

2018FA Count Percent Statewide Percent

Gender

Male 199 44% 46%

Female 257 56% 54%

Ethnicity




Hispanic 49 11% 15%


White 243 53% 59%


Unknown 26 6% 7%

Age

Less than 35 48 11% 13%

35-39 51 11% 12%

40-44 63 14% 12%

45-49 64 14% 13%

50-54 69 15% 12%

55-59 56 12% 12%

60-64 50 11% 11%

65 + 55 12% 15%

84


Female faculty outnumber male faculty by 12% compared to a statewide difference of 8%. Female faculty number 20% higher than male faculty.

Among full time faculty, 55% are age 50+ at Ohlone, but now 6% of full time faculty are under age 35; three years prior there were no full time faculty age less than 35..

Reflecting the demographics of the district, Ohlone has significantly higher representation of Asian faculty—both full time and adjunct—than is found statewide, but the rate is still less than the district population rate.

The percentage of African-American faculty mirrors the district residents, but Hispanic faculty are under-represented.

85


Full Time Faculty


Gender

Male 55 44% 45%

Female 69 56% 55%

Ethnicity




Hispanic 15 12% 16%


White 69 56% 59%


Unknown 7 6% 6%

Age

Less than 35 7 6% 7%

35-39 6 5% 11%

40-44 21 17% 14%

45-49 23 19% 16%

50-54 22 18% 15%

55-59 12 10% 14%

60-64 23 19% 13%

65 + 10 8% 10%

86


Adjunct Faculty


Gender

Male 144 43% 47%

Female 188 57% 53%

Ethnicity


Asian (including Filipinos) 84 25% 11%


Hispanic 34 10% 15%


White 174 52% 58%


Unknown 19 6% 8%

Age

Less than 35 41 12% 15%

35-39 45 14% 12%

40-44 42 13% 11%

45-49 41 12% 12%

50-54 47 14% 11%

55-59 44 13% 12%

60-64 27 8% 10%

65 + 45 14% 17%

87


Employees by Occupational Category - Headcount

Category Fall 2015 Fall 2017 Percent Change

Administration 17* 17 0.0%

Management 26 25 -3.8%

FT Faculty 110 118 7.3%

Adjunct Faculty 398 369 -7.3%

Classified 180 165 -8.3%

Total 731 694 -5.1%

*Includes 2 vacant positions

Fall 2015 Fall 2017 Percent Change

Students 9937.0 9056.0 -8.9%

Students per Administrator 584.5 532.7 -8.9%

Students per Manager 354.9 362.2 2.1%

Students per FT Faculty 90.3 76.7 -15.1%

Students per PT Facuty 25.0 24.5 -2.0%

Students per Classified 55.2 54.9 -0.5%

Students per All Staff 13.6 13.0 -7.4%

Employees by Occupational Category – Full-Time Equivalent

Category Fall 2015 Fall 2017 Percent Change

Administration 15.0 17.0 -15.6%

Management 27.3 25.0 1.1%

FT Faculty 117.6 124.2 -13.1%

Adjunct Faculty 165.1 152.6 30.7%

Classified 173.8 158.9 0.5%

Total 498.8 477.7 4.1%

88


Fall 2015 Fall 2017 Percent Change

Students 3924.0 3912.1 -0.3%

Students per Administrator

261.6 230.1 -12.0%

Students per Manager 143.7 156.5 8.9%

Students per FT Faculty

33.4 31.5 -5.7%

Students per PT Faculty

23.8 25.6 7.6%

Students per Classified 22.6 24.6 8.8%

Students per All Staff 7.9 8.2 3.8%

Since Fall 2015, the college has had a 5% decrease in staffing. Non-faculty staff have declined 7% while faculty have decreased by 4%. The student population, however, has declined 9% over the same period. As a result, workload in terms of students:staff has decreased by 7%. However, over that same time period, the workload on mid-level managers has increased.

Average Salary Comparison - By Bay 10 Districts Fall 2017

Management Full Time Faculty Classified Staff

Chabot-Las Positas $144,375 $99,150 $64,400

Contra Costa $137,157 $90,978 $60,671

Foothill-DeAnza $150,969 $97,445 $71,515

Marin $133,520 $103,059 $61,410

Ohlone $151,673 $114,075 $68,867

Peralta $142,671 $92,227 $60,727

San Francisco $166,951 $93,178 $68,850

San Jose-Evergreen $152,423 $125,632 $67,053

San Mateo $205,632 $103,047 $78,355

West Valley-Mission $146,272 $97,381 $76,666

*Source: California Community Colleges DataMart. Salary amounts are reported individually by each district and health and welfare benefits are not included in the reported salaries. Ohlone faculty and management have an allowance for benefits included in their salaries that may skew the comparisons by effectively reducing the average salary for faculty and management groups at Ohlone.

89


Salary comparisons are complicated even in the best of situations, but given Ohlone’s special circumstances noted above, opinions about the accuracy of such comparisons are especially difficult. The average salary comparisons reflect the college’s actual expenditures for faculty and management. However, actual expenditures by the college will not include the cost of benefits that one may pay personally rather than having benefits paid through the college. Conversely, for those who have benefits covered by a spouse, for instance, the full value of the salary would be accurately reflected in the numbers provided to DataMart. There is a move on campus to provide increased benefits for faculty and management, but that has not yet been fully realized, and until it is, salary comparisons will remain complicated. The same complication is not present when comparing classified staff salaries as full benefits are available to classified staff. Single college district comparisons are provided particularly for management comparisons. Multi-college districts tend to have additional layers of administration and, therefore, salary schedules. Note that among the Bay 10, San Francisco and Marin are also single college districts.

Average Salary Comparison - By Similarly-sized Single College Districts Fall 2017

Fall 2017 FTES


Allan Hancock 4158 $109,961 $82,015 $39,666

Cabrillo 4386 $120,628 $90,329 $47,250

College of the Desert 4295 $120,922 $100,455 $59,955

Hartnell 3436 $116,166 $91,672 $54,456

Imperial 3447 $128,415 $91,077 $52,076

Merced 4179 $111,709 $83,330 $39,262

Ohlone 3912 $151,673 $114,075 $68,867

Cuesta 3639 $118,397 $85,763 $50,414

Sequoias 4573 $124,802 $91,350 $47,157

Shasta 3173 $97,342 $91,517 $40,454

Solano 3275 $124,916 $82,080 $55,079

Victor Valley 4154 $114,636 $88,260 $57,040

90


2017 Average Salary as a Percent of 2017 Median Household Income

2017 Median Household Income


Allan Hancock $55,485 198% 148% 71%

Cabrillo $65,421 184% 138% 72%

College of the Desert $56,262 215% 179% 107%

Hartnell $54,864 212% 167% 99%

Imperial $43,581 295% 209% 119%

Merced $40,704 274% 205% 96%

Ohlone $122,191 124% 93% 56%

Cuesta $49,640 239% 173% 102%

Sequoias $54,934 227% 166% 86%

Shasta $46,389 210% 197% 87%

Solano $75,292 166% 109% 73%

Victor Valley $47,895 239% 184% 119%

Also presented is a comparison to the median household incomes for each of the cities where the single college districts are located. This will illustrate relative purchasing power of the salaries within their districts apart from a dollar for dollar comparison. What this shows is that Ohlone salaries, although appearing high by comparison, are the lowest of all noted districts when compared to median household income.

ohlone college environmental scan · ohlone college environmental scan ... there has also been a...

Documents