ohio teacher evaluation system (otes)
DESCRIPTION
Ohio Teacher Evaluation System (OTES). Timeline 2012-13: Pilot Programs 2013-14: OTES Implemented. Ohio Teacher Evaluation System (OTES). Designed to improve teaching and student learning P rofessional growth model - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
S
Ohio Teacher Evaluation System (OTES)
Timeline2012-13: Pilot Programs
2013-14: OTES Implemented
Ohio Teacher Evaluation System (OTES)
Designed to improve teaching and student learning
Professional growth model
Teachers evaluated using credentialed evaluators and rubric based on Ohio Framework
Ohio Teacher Evaluation Framework
3
50% Teacher Performance
Teacher Self-Assessment
Professional Growth Plan (or Improvement Plan) Goal 1: Student Achievement Goal 2: Teacher Performance Areas of Professional Growth
2 Observations (at least 30 minutes) with Pre and Post Conferences
Informal Walk-Throughs (less than 30 minutes)
Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession
Standard 1: Understand student learning & development
Standard 2: Know & understand the content area
Standard 3: Understand and used varied assessments to inform instruction & evaluate student learning
Standard 4: Plan & deliver effective instruction
Standard 5: Create learning environments that promotes high levels of learning & achievement
Standard 6: Collaborate & communicate with students, parents, administrators & community
Standard 7: Assume responsibility for professional growth
9
Ineffective Developing Proficient Accomplished
Instructiona
l Planni
ng
FOCUS FOR LEARNING
(Standard 4: Instruction)Sources of Evidence:
Pre-Conference
The teacher does not have a clear focus for student learning or the objective is too general to guide lesson planning or the objective is inappropriate for the students.
The teacher states a focus for student learning that is appropriate for students.
The teacher develops a measurable objective for student learning that aligns with the Ohio standards.The teacher can explain the importance of the objective and its appropriateness for students.
The teacher develops an ambitious and measurable objective for student learning that aligns with the Ohio standards. Teacher can explain how the objective fits into the broader unit and course goals for content learning and skills.
Stan
dard
Area
sOTES Rubric Structure
Indi
cato
rs
Ratings
Organizational
Area
Assessment DataStandard 3
Proficient Indicator
The teacher demonstrates an understanding that assessment is a means of evaluating and supporting student learning through effectively incorporating diagnostic, formative, and or summative assessments into lesson planning
Ohio Teacher Evaluation Framework
11
50% Student Growth Measures
3 Student Growth Components• Teacher Value-Added: Grade 4-8
Teachers of Math & Reading• Vendor Assessments• LEA (District) Determined Measures
Student Learning Objectives (SLO)
SLO’s: Teachers identify expected learning outcomes or growth targets for a group of students over a period of time Measurable goals Aligns with standards Demonstrates long-term growth targets that
the teacher sets at the beginning of the year for all students
Demonstrates a teachers impact on student learning
Teacher Ratings in Evaluation
50% Observations/ 50% Student Growth
Accomplished
Proficient
Developing
Ineffective
Additional Resources
Ohio Department of Education Educators
Educator Evaluation Teacher Evaluation