odm-based study archival

14
ODM-based Study Archival Jozef Aerts XML4Pharma

Upload: taffy

Post on 25-Feb-2016

58 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

ODM-based Study Archival. Jozef Aerts XML4Pharma. History of the work. February 2008: TMF asks to write an expert opinion (“Gutachten”) on the use of ODM for study archival June 2008: first draft February 2009: final version. Topics. Practical use of ODM for archival of clinical studies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ODM-based  Study Archival

ODM-based Study Archival

Jozef AertsXML4Pharma

Page 2: ODM-based  Study Archival

History of the work

February 2008: TMF asks to write an expert opinion (“Gutachten”) on the use of ODM for study archival

June 2008: first draft

February 2009: final version

Page 3: ODM-based  Study Archival

Topics

Practical use of ODM for archival of clinical studies

Advantages / Disadvantages

Electronic Signatures

Page 4: ODM-based  Study Archival

Practical use of ODM for Archival

Many EDC vendors archive as ODM+ CRFs as PDF

Only 1 extensive “experience report”CDISC Interchange Paris 2005: W.Kubick:“Case Study: Applying CDISC Standards to replace a

Legacy CDMS”

What are the best practices ?

Page 5: ODM-based  Study Archival

Wayne's experiences

200+ active studies 3500+ legacy CDMS archives Spanning 15 years

Options Formatted ASCII files SAS XPT CDISC ODM

Page 6: ODM-based  Study Archival

Wayne's experiences

13 months of planning, design, building and validating tools

Actual archival: 8 months (planned: 12-18) 5 staff (planned: 7)

Major issues Metadata were missing Audit trail reconstruction

Page 7: ODM-based  Study Archival

Study ArchivalAdvantages of CDISC ODM

Data + metadata Full audit trail 21 CFR 11 compliant File linking: “chains” of files

Special features => vendor extensions

Page 8: ODM-based  Study Archival

Study ArchivalAdvantages of CDISC ODM

XML is very well searchable(XPath, XQuery)

Native (or mixed) XML databases

Page 9: ODM-based  Study Archival

Study ArchivalDisadvantages of CDISC ODM

File size Same data in SAS XPT has half the size When zipped: 30% difference Compression factor: ~50 Best practice: one file per subject

Visual presentation is lost Use ODM “ArchiveLayout”

Page 10: ODM-based  Study Archival

ODM Archival Best Practices

1 file per subject File chaining using “FileOID” and

“PreviousFileOID” Metadata / ReferenceData in separate file or in

each file Vendor extensions XML-Signature

Page 11: ODM-based  Study Archival

Alternative formatsSAS XPT

Legacy format Many limitations Very limited set of metadata SAS software necessary Audit trails !

Page 12: ODM-based  Study Archival

Alternative formatsPDF

Interesting for (e)CRFs Metadata ? Audit trails

Page 13: ODM-based  Study Archival

Electronic Signaturesand ODM

XML files (but also sections of them) can be signed using XML-Signature

Signature is XML itself and can reside within the XML file

Uses electronic certificates New evolution: XAdES

Complies to European law Extends XML-Signature

Page 14: ODM-based  Study Archival

XML-Signature for ODM