ODI/ OAK Foundation

Child Protection and Poverty

Linkages

Rachel Marcus

Consultant, Overseas Development Institute

Focus of Research

Four thematic areas: inadequate care, sexual abuse and exploitation, physical violence and early marriage

1) What are the linkages between economic deprivation and child protection

violations? (Comprehensive literature review)

2) What actions in child protection programmes address economic deprivation and how effective are these actions? (Adapted systematic review)

• A 15 month research programme involving a comprehensive literature review, adapted systematic review, e-survey and expert interviews

• Country studies now under way in Uganda, Vietnam and Ethiopia

Relationship economic deprivation and child protection violations

• Of the child protection areas examined, economic deprivation is an important factor exacerbating the risk of: early marriage, sexual exploitation, involvement in gang/neighbourhood violence (as victim and perpetrator), children left without competent care while adults are working, institutionalisation, accidental injury

• Poor living environments may increase risk of sexual violence (eg unsafe neighbourhoods, communal toilets)

• Poor children at greater risk of sexual and physical abuse at work (because more likely to be working)

• Evidence on relationship between physical abuse and poverty mixed but overall limited, esp. where corporal punishment widely accepted.

Adapted Systematic Review: Evidence Base

Multi-dimensional conception of povertyKnowledge gap concerning impacts of actions to reduce economic

deprivation. Entailed looking at a wide range of child protection programmes and

other programmes where child protection outcomes were reported ie not just economic strengthening programmes

369 papers were quality assessed for adapted systematic reviewAfter quality assessment, 80 papers on interventions included in

review Overall 71 interventions examined, 13 for early marriage, 27 for sexual

violence, 15 for physical violence, and 20 for promoting better care (several programmes had impacts on more than one issue)

How far Do CP Programmes involve Economic

Strengthening Components? Economic strengthening programmesCash transfers In-kind transfersVocational skills training Entrepreneurship training and supportMicrofinance Job search information/ job matching

Between a third and a half the programmes examined have economic strengthening components. Most common for early marriage.

Largely run by NGOs. Only exceptions were large cash transfer programmes (state-run)

Very little integration with broader social/ child protection systems (reflects fact that most programmes examined were small-scale and run by NGOs)

Caveat: small number of programmes within each thematic area

Early Marriage (n=18)

Sexual Violence (n=26)

Physical Violence (n=15) Promoting Better Care (n=20)

Mechanism No. of interventions with this component

% No. of interventions with this component

% No. of interventions with this component

% No. of interventions with this component

% Total Occurrence of Each Component

Economic Strengthening

9 50 9 33 5 33 7 35 29

Education/ Awareness Raising/ Life skills (Children)

10 56 13 50 6 40 1 5 30

Education/ Awareness Raising (Adults)

9 50 8 31 12 80 9 45 38

Improving Access to or Quality of Services (mostly Education/ Day care)

5 28 0 0 0 03

15 8

Child Protection System Strengthening

2 11 10 56 4 27 1 5 17

Mentoring/ Social Support

7 35 8 44 3 20 4 20 4

Programme Mechanisms

Type of Intervention Occurrence in Interventions Examined

Total As % Economic Strengthening Activities

Concentrated in Which Thematic Areas?

EM SV PV BCCash transfers 2 1 2 5 12% Early marriageIn-kind transfers 2 4 3 9 22% Better care, early

marriageVocational skills training

4 4 5 1 14 33% Early marriage, Sexual violence, physical violence

Entrepreneurship training/ support

3 3 7% Sexual violence

Microfinance 5 3 1 1 10 24% Early marriage, Sexual violence

Job search information/ job matching

2 1 3 7% Early marriage, physical violence

Economic Strengthening Mechanisms

Early marriage: overview of programmes examined

• 18 programmes in South Asia, Ethiopia and • Senegal; • 3 large (reaching 100,000+ children) • 9/18 had economic strengthening components• Breakdown: 2 cash transfer, 2 in-kind transfer, 5 microfinance,4 vocational skills training, 1 job-search (NB several programmes had multiple economic strengthening activities)• Economic strengthening activities mostly run by NGOs (large cash transfer

programmes were state-run)

Cash and In-kind Transfers

Conditional cash transfers, uniform and fee subsidies, and provision of school materials helped keep girls in school and achieved significant reduction in EM

• Eg 1.2-15 years’ projected delay in age of marriage (Pakistan)• 30 % reduction in marriage among secondary school girls (Malawi)• Uniform recipient girls in Kenya 14% less likely to be married and boys 40% less likely

than control groupWas it:A) By keeping girls in school and thus they were seen as unmarriageable?OR B) through the impact on household finances?May be different mechanisms for in school and out-of-school girls (Malawi).

Most programmes lacked an awareness-raising component so no evidence as to whether this would have had additional impact.

Berhane Hewan (Ethiopia): school supplies had greatest impact on girls’ school attendance but community awareness raising had greatest effect on early marriage rates

Early marriage: Mixed evidence for vocational skills and

microfinance

• Mixed evidence about impact of microcredit for girls and trade-offs with schooling; especially in contexts where there has been a big push for secondary education for girls (e.g. Bangladesh); and also among younger girls (15/16 year olds).

• Savings generally seen more positively than credit• Vocational skills training mixed – reflects specific programmes/ evaluations

rather than constituting clear evidence on vocational skills training as strategy for reducing early marriage

• Job-search support in India had positive effect (but only one programme)• All these programmes targeted girls directly – none targeted families to

reduce economic constraints that may lead to early marriage

Early marriage: non-formal education & communication

activities• Non-formal education (eg life skills)

contributed to significant reduction; esp. in ability to negotiate timing of marriage

• NFE increased awareness of law and of safe age of marriage

• Even split between girls who felt able/ unable to influence marriage decisions

• Effectiveness of communication campaigns greatest among the youngest girls (10-14) and in contexts where viable alternatives to EM exist

• Critically important to bring influencers of social norms , (including religious leaders, grand/parents, mothers-in-laws) ‘on side’

Sexual violence: Overview of Programmes

• 26 programmes:21 in Africa, 2in Asia, 1 in CIS, 1 in LAC, 1 in Middle East

• Only 3/9 gave data on numbers reached. Of these 3 reached 2000+ children

• % run by NGOs• 9 (33%) had economic strengthening

components • 9 had economic strengthening components,

10 child protection strengthening, 13 NFE/ life skills for children/ youth and 8 awareness raising for adults

• ES programmes focused on commercial/ transactional sexual exploitation. Only 3 looked at trafficking.

Sexual violence: impact of economic strengthening programmes

• Strongest vocational skills programmes seen in this theme (eg Save the Children programme in Northern Uganda, BRAC in Uganda) – linked to entrepreneurship training alongside vocational skills

• Savings more effective than loans for younger adolescents• Cash & in-kind transfers limited but some evidence of uniform

subsidy helping reduce cross-generational sex (typically exploitative and risky)

• Skills training and transfers generally played limited role in reducing trafficking

Sexual violence: Positive role of child protection systems and life

skills• Child protection systems strengthening:- Appeared most effective for sexual abuse (compared to other violations) as fitted with

community perceptions of what constitutes abuse- Diverse approaches, including school-based protection structures, sensitising police, building

community level reporting structures, raising adult awareness- Poverty a barrier to use of child protection system (court fees, medical fees, corruption –

Uganda & Zambia)

• Life skills programmes: had positive effect on girls’ sense of their capacity to negotiate around sex (Uganda, Kenya, E Africa regional);

- Boys learned about girls’ views towards sexual harassment (Thailand, Namibia); important because school-based abuse more common by boys than teachers

-Changed attitudes, and some evidence of reduced teen pregnancy (Kenya)- Many achieved significant changes without economic strengthening components

Physical violence

• 15 interventions; 6 in Africa, 6 in LAC, 2 in Middle East, 1 in SE Europe, 0 in Asia

• All small-scale• Deal with corporal punishment/ physical abuse,

involvement in gang violence, former child soldiers• 5/15 had economic strengthening component • (vocational skills training, microfinance, assistance

with job searching)• All 5 were related to gangs/ post-conflict violence

prevention• All economic strengthening activities were run by

NGOs; awareness raising programmes for parents run by government or academics

Physical violence: awareness raising and NFE play important

role• Awareness raising for adults: generally worked well in supporting parents and

teachers to find alternatives to physical punishment. (eg Lebanon reduction in use of severe physical punishment from 40% to 6%)– Most programmes have focused on low-income communities and achieve change

without complementary economic strengthening activities.

• Life/ vocational skills for youth: typically for youth in violent neighbourhoods, in or at risk of gang involvement or of victimisation.– Help build social networks that help break down rivalries between neighbourhoods

and provide safe spaces to socialise; mentoring role also important– Most effective projects provided skills with high demand (ICT) which helped

marginalised youth escape poverty and become socially integrated through work– But economic strengthening components can be challenging as impoverished

communities may struggle to invest in youth-owned businesses – as in post-war Angola

Promoting better care: overview of programmes

• 20 programmes: 11 in Africa, 6 in Asia, 6 in LAC, 3 in Middle East

• Main approaches: improved child care knowledge/ practice, improved access to day care, reduced risk/ incidence of accidents, better care of orphans

• 7/20 programmes had economic strengthening component – primarily orphan support programmes run by NGOs

• Principally in-kind transfers, some cash and microfinance

• 5 programmes reached over 10,000 children (national cash transfer, nursery and parenting programmes)

Better care: training, mentoring, subsidised day-care

• Training effective in changing knowledge and practices re child care, especially regarding greater stimulation, and accident prevention. Poverty emerged as barrier to greater change in accident prevention practices (South Africa, Mexico, Bangladesh)

• Mentoring programmes: can provide essential material support to carers / vulnerable children, but constrained by mentors’ poverty, and problems of sustainability, low prioritisation and underfinancing by village governments (Tanzania). Also raises problems of singling out orphans.

• Subsidised day care helped reduce poverty by enabling parents to work, and/or prevented young children being left alone, e.g. Mexico, Guatemala, but demand outstrips supply - even with Mexico’s estancias which is reaching 200,000 children. Plus issues of quality

• Cash transfers seen as effective in alleviating financial constraints to good care; positive impacts seen from both conditional and unconditional transfers (but only two programmes – Uganda and Peru)

Key Knowledge Gaps

• What is the relative effectiveness of individual components of integrated programmes?

• Could integrated programmes be streamlined to facilitate going to scale?

• For what types of child protection issues can we achieve as much or more through broader poverty interventions compared to child protection-focused initiatives?

• What about longitudinal effects? Are the impacts of awareness-raising/ life skills programmes more sustainable over time than those that focus on economic strengthening?

• What political economy factors have facilitated programmes with positive child protection outcomes going to scale?

Conclusions: How important are economic strengthening

activities?• Varies across and within themes• Much change achieved by changing attitudes/ knowledge alone

(sexual harassment, physical violence, early marriage, better care)BUTAlso strong evidence of positive effect of transfers/ subsidies on

reducing early marriage without any attitude-change activitiesAnd positive impacts of good quality entrepreneurship/ vocational

skills for sexual exploitation, gang violenceAnd income poverty continues to be barrier to accessing CP systems,

improving care practices and continues to exacerbate likelihood of early marriage & sexual exploitation

Economic strengthening: where are impacts greatest?

Age- Emerging evidence that microcredit, entrepreneurship training

worked better for older adolescents; vocational skills worked with ‘mid-adolescents’ and upwards if well linked into local labour markets and adequate support provided

- Little attention to helping parents generate better incomes – focus principally on adolescents

- Youngest children bypassed by programmes that distribute transfers (cash or in-kind) through school, though they may share in broader benefits to households