october 30, 2017 - hanford site

October 30, 2017 Mr. Scot Fitzgerald CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company MSIN R3-50 CHPRC PO Box 1600 Richland, Washington 99352 Re: CHPRC SAF F14-021 Work Order: 434194 SDG: GEL434194 Dear Mr. Fitzgerald:

GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the enclosed analytical results for thesample(s) we received on October 04, 2017. This original data report has been prepared and reviewed inaccordance with GEL’s standard operating procedures.

Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needson time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have anyquestions, please do not hesitate to call me at (843) 556-8171, ext. 4505.

Sincerely, PM_SIGN_HERE Heather Shaffer Project Manager

Purchase Order: 300416 - 7H Chain of Custody: F14-021-155, F14-021-156, F14-021-157 and F14-021-158 Enclosures

OCTOBER 30, 2017

1 of 66

Table of Contents

Case Narrative......................................................................................1

Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation...............................9

Data Review Qualifier Definitions.....................................................15

Laboratory Certifications....................................................................17

General Chem Analysis......................................................................19

Case Narrative............................................................................20

Sample Data Summary...............................................................24

Quality Control Summary..........................................................28

Radiological Analysis.........................................................................32

Case Narrative............................................................................33

Sample Data Summary...............................................................41

Quality Control Summary..........................................................60

OCTOBER 30, 2017

2 of 66

Case Narrative

Page 1 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

3 of 66

General Narrativefor

CH2MHill Plateau Remediation CompanyCHPRC SAF F14-021

SDG: GEL434194

October 30, 2017 Laboratory Identification: GEL Laboratories LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, South Carolina 29407 (843) 556-8171

Summary

Sample receipt

The sample(s) arrived at GEL Laboratories, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina on October 04, 2017, for analysis.The samples were delivered with proper chain of custody documentation and signatures. All sample containersarrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. There are no additional comments concerning samplereceipt.

Items of Note All efforts were made by the lab to meet any short hold times. Samples that were analyzed outsideof the initial hold time but still within 2X hold time will be noted in the lab case narrative.

Sample Identification The laboratory received the following samples:

LaboratoryIdentification

SampleDescription

434194001 B3F968434194002 B3F969434194003 B3F970434194004 B3F971

Case Narrative

Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) StandardOperating Procedures. Any technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction arecontained in the analytical case narratives in the enclosed data package.

Page 2 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

4 of 66

Data Package

The enclosed data package contains the following sections: General Narrative, Chain of Custody and SupportingDocumentation, and data from the following fractions: General Chemistry and Radiochemistry.

We certify that this package is in compliance with the SOW, both technically and for completeness, including afull description of, explanation of, and corrective actions for, any and all deviations, from either the analysesrequested or the case narrative requested. Release of the data contained in this hard copy data package has beenauthorized by the Laboratory Analytical Manager (or designee) and the laboratory’s client servicesrepresentative as verified by their signatures on this report.

PM_SIGN_HERE Heather Shaffer Project Manager

Page 3 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

5 of 66

Technical Case Narrative

CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company (CPRC) SDG #: GEL434194

Work Order #: 434194

General Chemistry Ion Chromatography All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods andprocedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls whereapplicable, with the following exceptions. Quality Control (QC) Information Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LCSD) An LCSD was used in place of matrix QC due to the high activity of the sample matrix (ALARA). 434194001(B3F968). Miscellaneous Information Manual Integrations Sample 434194001 (B3F968) were manually integrated to correctly position the baseline as set in the calibrationstandards. Specific Conductivity There are no exceptions, anomalies or deviations from the specified methods. All sample data provided in thisreport met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration,continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable.

Radiochemistry AMCMISO_EIE_PLATE_AEA: (HIGH RAD) All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods andprocedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls whereapplicable, with the following exceptions. Quality Control (QC) Information RDL Met The blank (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to keeping the blank volume consistent with theother sample aliquots.

Page 4 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

6 of 66

Sample Analyte Value

1203889239 (MB)Americium-241 Result 13.7 < MDA 37.3 > RDL 1 pCi/L

Technical Information Recounts The Laboratory Control Sample 1203889241 (LCS) was recounted due to low recovery and then again due to adetector error. The third count is reported. PUISO_PLATE_AEA:COMMON (HIGH RAD) All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods andprocedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls whereapplicable, with the following exceptions. Quality Control (QC) Information RDL Met The blank (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to keeping the blank volume consistent with theother sample aliquots.


1203889251 (MB)Plutonium-238 Result 12.5 < MDA 48.7 > RDL 1 pCi/L

Plutonium-239/240Result -4.72 < MDA 53.8 > RDL 1 pCi/L

Sample (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to the small sample aliquot used. The aliquot wasreduced due to the high activity of other isotopes and in attempt to minimize interference.


434194004 (B3F971)Plutonium-238 Result 10.5 < MDA 50 > RDL 1 pCi/L

Plutonium-239/240Result 59.8 < MDA 63.4 > RDL 1 pCi/L

Technical Information Recounts Sample 1203889253 (LCS) was recounted due to high recovery and then recounted twice more due to peakshifts. The fourth count is reported. Miscellaneous Information Manual Integration Manual integration of alpha spectroscopy spectra 1203889253 (LCS) was performed to fully separate counts inRegions of Interest which would have been biased. Additional Comments The tracer peak centroid for sample 1203889253 (LCS) is greater than 50 keV from the expected library energy

Page 5 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

7 of 66

value for the tracer; however, the tracer yield requirement was met and the tracer peak is within the tracer regionof interest. UISO_PLATE_AEA:COMMON (HIGH RAD) All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods andprocedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls whereapplicable, with the following exceptions. Quality Control (QC) Information RDL Met The blank (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to keeping the blank volume consistent with theother sample aliquots.


1203889258 (MB)Uranium-233/234Result 36.8 < MDA 72.8 > RDL 1 pCi/L

Uranium-235/236Result 39.2 < MDA 61.7 > RDL 1 pCi/L

Uranium-238 Result 15.9 < MDA 43.2 > RDL 1 pCi/L

Samples (See Below) did not meet the detection limits due to the small sample aliquots used. The aliquots werereduced due to the high activity of other isotopes and in attempt to minimize interference.


1203889259 (B3F969DUP)Uranium-235/236Result 3.18 < MDA 69.4 > RDL 1 pCi/L

434194003 (B3F970) Uranium-235/236Result 19.6 < MDA 53.3 > RDL 1 pCi/L

434194004 (B3F971) Uranium-233/234Result -11.5 < MDA 82.8 > RDL 1 pCi/L

Uranium-235/236Result 0 < MDA 36.6 > RDL 1 pCi/L


Miscellaneous Information Additional Comments The tracer peak centroid for sample 434194002 (B3F969) is greater than 50 keV from the expected libraryenergy value for the tracer; however, the tracer yield requirement was met and the tracer peak is within the tracerregion of interest. GAMMA_GS:COMMON (Cs137) HIGH RAD All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods andprocedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls whereapplicable, with the following exceptions.

Page 6 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

8 of 66

Quality Control (QC) Information RDL Met The blank (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to keeping the blank volume consistent with theother sample aliquots.


1203889225 (MB)Cesium-137Result 1.59 < MDA 30.7 > RDL 15 pCi/L

SRTOT_SEP_PRECIP_GPC: COMMON (HIGH RAD) All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods andprocedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls whereapplicable, with the following exceptions. Quality Control (QC) Information RDL Met The blank (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to keeping the blank volume consistent with theother sample aliquots.


1203889261 (MB)Total StrontiumResult -82.9 < MDA 373 > RDL 2 pCi/L

Technical Information Recounts Sample 434194004 (B3F971) was recounted to confirm the result. The recount is reported. TRITIUM_DIST_LSC: COMMON (HIGH RAD) All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods andprocedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls whereapplicable, with the following exceptions. Quality Control (QC) Information RDL Met The blank (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to keeping the blank volume consistent with theother sample aliquots.


1203889265 (MB)Tritium Result -14700 < MDA 32700 > RDL 100 pCi/L

Page 7 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

9 of 66

Laboratory Comp for preserved & unpres analysis There are no exceptions, anomalies or deviations from the specified methods. All sample data provided in thisreport met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration,continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable. Certification Statement Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of therequirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.

Page 8 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

10 of 66

Chain of Custody andSupporting

Documentation

Page 9 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

11 of 66

of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

12 of 66

of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

13 of 66

of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

14 of 66

of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

15 of 66

of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

16 of 66

Data Review QualifierDefinitions

Page 15 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

17 of 66

GEL LABORATORIES LLC2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 (843) 556−8171

Report Date: 26−OCT−17

Project Specific Qualifier Definitions for GEL Client Code: CPRC

Page 1 of 1

Qualifier Qualifier Definition Department Fraction

U

J

P

C

B

E

A

X

N

*

>

Z

B

D

E

M

o

S

T

W

B

Y

+

B

C

C

<

UX

Analyzed for but not detected above limiting criteria. Includes MDL, MDA, PQL, zero, counting error, and total analytical error.

The analyte was detected at a value less than the contract required detection limit (RDL), but greater than or equal to the IDL/MDL (asappropriate).Value is estimatedAroclor target analyte with greater than 25% difference between column analyses.

Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis

The analyte was detected in both the associated QC blank and in the sample.

Concentration exceeds the calibration range of the instrument

The TIC is a suspected aldol−condensation product

Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier

Spike Sample recovery is outside control limits.

Duplicate analysis not within control limits

Result greater than quantifiable range or greater than upper limit of the analysis range


The analyte was detected at a value less than the contract required detection limit (RDL), but greater than or equal to the IDL/MDL (asappropriate).Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of sample.

Reported value is estimated due to interferences. See comment in narrative.

Duplicate precision not met.

Analyte failed to recover within LCS limits (0rganics only)

Reported value determined by the Method of Standard Additions (MSA)

Spike and/or spike duplicate sample recovery is outside control limits.

Post−digestion spike recovery for GFAA out of control limit. Sample absorbency < 50% of spike absorbency.

The associated QC sample blank has a result >= 2X the MDA and, after corrections, result is >= MDA for this sample


Correlation coefficient for Method of Standard Additions (MSA) is < 0.995

The analyte was detected at a value less than the contract required detection limit (RDL), but greater than or equal to the IDL/MDL (asappropriate).Target analyte was detected in the sample and the associated blank. The associated blank concentration is >= EQL or is > 5% of themeasured concentration and/or decision level for associated samples.Target analyte was detected in the sample and the associated blank. The associated blank concentration is >= EQL or is > 5% of themeasured concentration and/or decision level for associated samples.Sample is below the EPA guidance level for Reactive Releasable Cyanide and/or Reactive Releasable Sulfide

Gamma Spectroscopy−−Uncertain identification

Organics

Organics

Organics

Organics

Organics

Organics

Inorganics

General Chemistry

Inorganics

Inorganics

Inorganics

Organics

Inorganics

Organics

Inorganics

Radiological

Inorganics

General Chemistry

Inorganics

General Chemistry

General Chemistry

Radiological

Pesticide

Semi−Volatile

Metals

Metals

Metals

Metals

Page

16

of 6

4

OCTOBER 30, 2017

18 of 66

LaboratoryCertifications

Page 17 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

19 of 66

State CertificationAlaska

ArkansasCLIA

California Colorado

ConnecticutDelaware

DoD ELAP/ ISO17025 A2LAFlorida NELAP

Foreign Soils PermitGeorgia

Georgia SDWAHawaii

Idaho ChemistryIdaho Radiochemistry

Illinois NELAPIndiana

Kansas NELAPKentucky SDWA

Kentucky WastewaterLouisiana NELAPLouisiana SDWA

MarylandMassachusetts

MichiganMississippiNebraskaNevada

New Hampshire NELAPNew Jersey NELAP

New MexicoNew York NELAP

North CarolinaNorth Carolina SDWA

North DakotaOklahoma

Pennsylvania NELAPPuerto Rico

S.Carolina RadchemSouth Carolina Chemistry

TennesseeTexas NELAPUtah NELAP

VermontVirginia NELAP

WashingtonWest Virginia

UST−011088−0651

42D09040462940

SC00012PH−0169SC000122567.01E87156

P330−15−00283, P330−15−00253SC00012

967SC00012SC00012SC00012200029

C−SC−01E−10332

9012990129

03046 (AI33904)LA170010

270M−SC012

9976SC00012

NE−OS−26−13SC000122018−1

205415SC002

SC0001211501233

45709R−1589904

68−00485SC000121012000210120001TN 02934

T104704235−17−12SC000122017−24

VT87156460202C780

997404

List of current GEL Certifications as of 30 October 2017

Page 18 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

20 of 66

General Chem Analysis

Page 19 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

21 of 66

Case Narrative

Page 20 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

22 of 66

General Chemistry Technical Case Narrative



Product: Ion Chromatography Analytical Method: 9056_ANIONS_IC Analytical Procedure: GL-GC-E-086 REV# 25 Analytical Batch: 1706568 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s). GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 434194001 B3F968 1203889097 Method Blank (MB) 1203889098 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) 1203889099 Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LCSD) The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis. Data Summary: All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and proceduresfor initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable, with thefollowing exceptions. Quality Control (QC) Information Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LCSD) An LCSD was used in place of matrix QC due to the high activity of the sample matrix (ALARA). 434194001(B3F968). Miscellaneous Information Manual Integrations Sample 434194001 (B3F968) were manually integrated to correctly position the baseline as set in the calibrationstandards.

Page 21 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

23 of 66

Product: Specific Conductivity Analytical Method: EPA 120.1 Analytical Procedure: GL-GC-E-009 REV# 15 Analytical Batch: 1711208 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s). GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 434194001 B3F968 434194003 B3F970 434194004 B3F971 1203900828 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) 1203900829 434194001(B3F968) Sample Duplicate (DUP) The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis. Data Summary: There are no exceptions, anomalies or deviations from the specified methods. All sample data provided in this reportmet the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuingcalibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable. Certification Statement Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of therequirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.

Page 22 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

24 of 66

GEL LABORATORIES LLC2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com

CPRC001 CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company

Client SDG: GEL434194 GEL Work Order: 434194

GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all CLP-like deliverablesreceive a third level review of the fractional data package.

The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:B The analyte was detected at a value less than the contract required detection limit (RDL), but greater than or equalto the IDL/MDL (as appropriate).U Analyzed for but not detected above limiting criteria. Includes MDL, MDA, PQL, zero, counting error, and totalanalytical error.

forQualifier Definition Report

Signature: Name:

Date: Title:23 OCT 2017

Kristen Mizzell

Analyst I

Review/Validation

Page 23 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

25 of 66

Sample Data Summary

Page 24 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

26 of 66

Certificate of Analysis


Report Date: October 23, 2017

Parameter Result UnitsQualifier Analyst Date TimeDF Batch MethodRLDL PF

Ion Chromatography

Titration and Ion Analysis

1706568

1711208

1839

1415

ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L

umhos/cm

10/04/17

10/20/17

MXL2

VH1

250200500250250500500

1.00

1111111

1

Mr. Scot FitzgeraldContact:

CH2MHill Plateau Remediation CompanyCompany :MSIN R3-50 CHPRC

Richland, Washington 99352

Address :

CHPRC SAF F14-021Project:

434194001WATER03-OCT-17 07:3004-OCT-17

B3F968 CPRC0F14021Project:CPRC001Client ID:

Client

Sample ID:

Receive Date:

PO Box 1600

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:Collect Date:

Collector:

67.067.033.033.033.067.0133

1.00

1

2

UBUBUUU

BromideChlorideFluorideNitrate-NNitrite-NPhosphorus in phosphateSulfate

Conductivity

9056_ANIONS_IC: COMMON + (add-on) "As Received"

120.1_CONDUCTIVITY: COMMON "As Received"

67.089.833.081.633.067.0133

1.24

The following Analytical Methods were performed:

12

Method Description 9056_ANIONS_ICEPA 120.1

Analyst Comments

Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting LimitSQL: Sample Quantitation Limit

Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution FactorDL: Detection LimitMDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration

Page 25 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

27 of 66






17112081422umhos/cm 10/20/17VH11.00 1




Address :


434194003WATER03-OCT-17 07:3004-OCT-17


Client

Sample ID:

Receive Date:

PO Box 1600

Client Sample ID:


Collector:

1.00 1Conductivity120.1_CONDUCTIVITY: COMMON "As Received"

1.47


1Method Description

EPA 120.1Analyst Comments

Notes:



Page 26 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

28 of 66






17112081422umhos/cm 10/20/17VH11.00 1




Address :


434194004WATER03-OCT-17 07:3004-OCT-17


Client

Sample ID:

Receive Date:

PO Box 1600

Client Sample ID:


Collector:

1.00 1Conductivity120.1_CONDUCTIVITY: COMMON "As Received"

1.90


1Method Description

EPA 120.1Analyst Comments

Notes:



Page 27 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

29 of 66

Quality ControlSummary

Page 28 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

30 of 66

QC Summary

GEL LABORATORIES LLC2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com

Ion Chromatography1706568Batch

Bromide

Chloride

Fluoride

Nitrate-N

Nitrite-N

Phosphorus in phosphate

Sulfate

Bromide

Chloride

Fluoride

Nitrate-N

Nitrite-N


Parmname


CH2MHill Plateau Remediation CompanyMSIN R3-50 CHPRC

Richland, Washington

October 23, 2017Report Date:

Units

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

Anlst Date Time

MXL2 10/04/17 17:42

10/04/17 18:10

QC

1240

4800

2530

2440

2470

1260

9870

1240

4830

2550

2450

2480

1280

NOM Sample Range

(80%-120%)

(80%-120%)

(80%-120%)

(80%-120%)

(80%-120%)

(80%-120%)

(80%-120%)

(0%-20%)

(0%-20%)

(0%-20%)

(0%-20%)

(0%-20%)

(0%-20%)

Qual

QC1203889098

QC1203889099

0.0324

0.565

0.476

0.45

0.166

1.26

REC%

98.8

96.1

101

97.6

98.8

101

98.7

98.9

96.6

102

98

99

102

1250

5000

2500

2500

2500

1250

10000

1250

5000

2500

2500

2500

1250

LCS

LCSD

434194Workorder:

PO Box 1600

RPD%

Page 1 of 3

Page 29 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

31 of 66

QC Summary


Ion Chromatography


1706568

1711208

Batch

Batch

Sulfate

Bromide

Chloride

Fluoride

Nitrate-N

Nitrite-N


Sulfate

Conductivity

Conductivity

Parmname Units

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

umhos/cm

umhos/cm

Anlst Date Time

MXL2

VH1

10/04/17 18:10

10/04/17 17:13

10/20/17 14:22

10/20/17 14:15

QC

9890

67.0

67.0

33.0

33.0

33.0

67.0

133

1.23

1400

NOM Sample

1.24

Range

(0%-20%)

(+/-1.00)

(80%-120%)

Qual

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

QC1203889097

QC1203900829 434194001

QC1203900828

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:

0.17

0.81

REC%

98.9

99.3

10000

1410

MB

DUP

LCS

434194Workorder:

<

>

B

C

D

Sample is below the EPA guidance level for Reactive Releasable Cyanide and/or Reactive Releasable Sulfide


The analyte was detected at a value less than the contract required detection limit (RDL), but greater than or equal to the IDL/MDL (as appropriate).

Target analyte was detected in the sample and the associated blank. The associated blank concentration is >= EQL or is > 5% of the measuredconcentration and/or decision level for associated samples.Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of sample.

^

RPD%

Notes:

Page 2 of 3

Page 30 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

32 of 66

QC Summary


Parmname

Page 3 of 3

Units Anlst Date TimeQCNOM Sample RangeQual REC%

434194Workorder:

N

U

X

Y

Z






N/A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPD not applicable.^ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater thanfive times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +/- theRL is used to evaluate the DUP result.* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.

Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of therequirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.

RPD%

Page 31 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

33 of 66

Radiological Analysis

Page 32 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

34 of 66

Case Narrative

Page 33 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

35 of 66

Radiochemistry Technical Case Narrative



Product: AMCMISO_EIE_PLATE_AEA: (HIGH RAD) Analytical Method: AMCMISO_EIE_PREC_AEA Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-011 REV# 26 Analytical Batch: 1706632

The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s). GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 434194002 B3F969 434194003 B3F970 434194004 B3F971 1203889239 Method Blank (MB) 1203889240 434194002(B3F969) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1203889241 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.

Data Summary: All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods andprocedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls whereapplicable, with the following exceptions. Quality Control (QC) Information RDL Met The blank (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to keeping the blank volume consistent with theother sample aliquots.


1203889239 (MB)Americium-241 Result 13.7 < MDA 37.3 > RDL 1 pCi/L

Technical Information Recounts The Laboratory Control Sample 1203889241 (LCS) was recounted due to low recovery and then again due to adetector error. The third count is reported. Product: PUISO_PLATE_AEA:COMMON (HIGH RAD) Analytical Method: PUISO_PRECIP_AEA

Page 34 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

36 of 66

Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-011 REV# 26 Analytical Batch: 1706636




1203889251 (MB)Plutonium-238 Result 12.5 < MDA 48.7 > RDL 1 pCi/L

Plutonium-239/240Result -4.72 < MDA 53.8 > RDL 1 pCi/L

Sample (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to the small sample aliquot used. The aliquot wasreduced due to the high activity of other isotopes and in attempt to minimize interference.


434194004 (B3F971)Plutonium-238 Result 10.5 < MDA 50 > RDL 1 pCi/L

Plutonium-239/240Result 59.8 < MDA 63.4 > RDL 1 pCi/L

Technical Information Recounts Sample 1203889253 (LCS) was recounted due to high recovery and then recounted twice more due to peakshifts. The fourth count is reported. Miscellaneous Information Manual Integration Manual integration of alpha spectroscopy spectra 1203889253 (LCS) was performed to fully separate counts inRegions of Interest which would have been biased. Additional Comments

Page 35 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

37 of 66

The tracer peak centroid for sample 1203889253 (LCS) is greater than 50 keV from the expected library energyvalue for the tracer; however, the tracer yield requirement was met and the tracer peak is within the tracer regionof interest. Product: UISO_PLATE_AEA:COMMON (HIGH RAD) Analytical Method: UISO_IE_PRECIP_AEA Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-011 REV# 26 Analytical Batch: 1706639




1203889258 (MB)Uranium-233/234Result 36.8 < MDA 72.8 > RDL 1 pCi/L

Uranium-235/236Result 39.2 < MDA 61.7 > RDL 1 pCi/L


Samples (See Below) did not meet the detection limits due to the small sample aliquots used. The aliquots werereduced due to the high activity of other isotopes and in attempt to minimize interference.


1203889259 (B3F969DUP)Uranium-235/236Result 3.18 < MDA 69.4 > RDL 1 pCi/L

434194003 (B3F970) Uranium-235/236Result 19.6 < MDA 53.3 > RDL 1 pCi/L

434194004 (B3F971) Uranium-233/234Result -11.5 < MDA 82.8 > RDL 1 pCi/L

Uranium-235/236Result 0 < MDA 36.6 > RDL 1 pCi/L

Page 36 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

38 of 66


Miscellaneous Information Additional Comments The tracer peak centroid for sample 434194002 (B3F969) is greater than 50 keV from the expected libraryenergy value for the tracer; however, the tracer yield requirement was met and the tracer peak is within the tracerregion of interest. Product: GAMMA_GS:COMMON (Cs137) HIGH RAD Analytical Method: 901.1_GAMMA_GS Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-013 REV# 27 Analytical Batch: 1706626




1203889225 (MB)Cesium-137Result 1.59 < MDA 30.7 > RDL 15 pCi/L

Product: SRTOT_SEP_PRECIP_GPC: COMMON (HIGH RAD)

Page 37 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

39 of 66

Analytical Method: SRTOT_SEP_PRECIP_GPC Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-004 REV# 19 Analytical Batch: 1706640




1203889261 (MB)Total StrontiumResult -82.9 < MDA 373 > RDL 2 pCi/L

Technical Information Recounts Sample 434194004 (B3F971) was recounted to confirm the result. The recount is reported. Product: TRITIUM_DIST_LSC: COMMON (HIGH RAD) Analytical Method: TRITIUM_DIST_LSC Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-002 REV# 22 Analytical Batch: 1706641

The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s). GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 434194001 B3F968 434194003 B3F970 434194004 B3F971 1203889265 Method Blank (MB) 1203889266 434194001(B3F968) Sample Duplicate (DUP)

Page 38 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

40 of 66

1203889267 434194001(B3F968) Matrix Spike (MS) 1203889268 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.



1203889265 (MB)Tritium Result -14700 < MDA 32700 > RDL 100 pCi/L

Product: Laboratory Comp for preserved & unpres analysis Composite Preparation Method: GL-RAD-A-026 Composite Preparation Procedure: GL-RAD-A-026 REV# 17 Composite Preparation Batch: 1706579

The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s). GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 434194003 B3F970 434194004 B3F971 The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.

Data Summary: There are no exceptions, anomalies or deviations from the specified methods. All sample data provided in thisreport met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration,continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable. Certification Statement Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of therequirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.

Page 39 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

41 of 66


CPRC001 CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company

Client SDG: GEL434194 GEL Work Order: 434194

GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all CLP-like deliverablesreceive a third level review of the fractional data package.

The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:U Analyzed for but not detected above limiting criteria. Includes MDL, MDA, PQL, zero, counting error, and totalanalytical error.

forQualifier Definition Report

Signature: Name:

Date: Title:30 OCT 2017

Theresa Austin

Group Leader

Review/Validation

Page 40 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

42 of 66

Sample Data Summary

Page 41 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

43 of 66

GEL Laboratories LLC

Rad Certificate of Analysis

Sample Summary

Page 1 of 1


SDG Number: GEL434194Lab Sample ID: 434194001 Matrix: WATER

Date Received: 10/04/2017 09:05Date Collected: 10/03/2017 07:30

Surrogate/Tracer recovery Recovery% Acceptable Limits

8.72E+05 1.79E+05 33200

Client: CPRC001 Project: CPRC0F14021

CAS No. Parmname ResultQual RDL

Method: TRITIUM_DIST_LSC GL-RAD-A-002Batch ID: 1706641Instrument: LSCYELLOW

15 min

SOP Ref:Run Date: 10/19/2017 09:13 Analyst: JXC5

1 mLAliquot:

Units

pCi/L

B3F968Client ID:

Prep Date: 10/18/2017 00:00

Result Nominal

1706641 EPA 906.0 Modified

"As Received"

Prep Method:

Prep Basis:

TPU MDC

Count Time:

Comments:

Prep Batch:T1706641.xlsData File:

Tritium10028-17-8 100

Units

+/-59600

Uncert

TPU and Counting Uncertainty are calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

The MDC is a sample specific MDC.

Page 42 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

44 of 66



Sample Summary

Page 1 of 1





8.19E+05 71800 445



Method: 901.1_GAMMA_GS GL-RAD-A-013Batch ID: 1706626Instrument: WELL

120 min


0.2 LAliquot:

Units

pCi/L

B3F969Client ID:

Prep Date: 10/09/2017 00:00

Result Nominal

1706626 EPA 901.1

"As Received"

Prep Method:

Prep Basis:

TPU MDC

Count Time:

Comments:

U Analyzed for but not detected above limiting criteria. Includes MDL, MDA, PQL, zero, counting error, and total analytical error.

Prep Batch:G434194002.CNF;2 Data File:

Cesium-13710045-97-3 15.0

Units

+/-2820

Uncert



Page 43 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

45 of 66



Sample Summary

Page 1 of 1





4990 718 51.9


Curium-243/244 Tracer 105 (30%-105%)


Method: AMCMISO_EIE_PREC_AEA GL-RAD-A-011Batch ID: 1706632Instrument: 1066

240 min

SOP Ref:Run Date: 10/19/2017 13:33 Analyst: AXM6

0.001 LAliquot:

Units

pCi/L

B3F969Client ID:

Prep Date: 10/18/2017 00:00

Result Nominal

2640 2500 pCi/L

1706632 DOE EML HASL-300, Am-05

"As Received"

Prep Method:

Prep Basis:

TPU MDC

Count Time:

Comments:


Prep Batch:S0434194002_AM.1A.gcnfData File:

Americium-24114596-10-2 1.00

Units

+/-368

Uncert



Page 44 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

46 of 66



Sample Summary

Page 1 of 1





861

5950

197

968

50.8

48.5


Plutonium-236 Tracer 84.3 (30%-105%)


Method: PUISO_PRECIP_AEA GL-RAD-A-011Batch ID: 1706636Instrument: 1077

239.9998 min


0.001 LAliquot:

Units

pCi/L

pCi/L

B3F969Client ID:

Prep Date: 10/18/2017 00:00

Result Nominal

1130 1340 pCi/L

1706636 DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-11-

"As Received"

Prep Method:

Prep Basis:

TPU MDC

Count Time:

Comments:


Prep Batch:S0434194002_PU.1A.gcnfData File:

Plutonium-238

Plutonium-239/240

13981-16-3

OER-100-70

1.00

1.00

Units

+/-149

+/-388

Uncert



Page 45 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

47 of 66



Sample Summary

Page 1 of 1





91.9

30.9

54.3

U

60.9

40.9

47.3

54.9

30.9

46.1


Uranium-232 Tracer 91 (30%-105%)


Method: UISO_IE_PRECIP_AEA GL-RAD-A-011Batch ID: 1706639Instrument: 1150

240 min


0.001 LAliquot:

Units

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

B3F969Client ID:

Prep Date: 10/18/2017 00:00

Result Nominal

1890 2080 pCi/L

1706639 DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-R

"As Received"

Prep Method:

Prep Basis:

TPU MDC

Count Time:

Comments:


Prep Batch:S0434194002_UU.1A.gcnfData File:

Uranium-233/234

Uranium-235/236

Uranium-238

13968-55-3/13966-29-5

U-233/234

15117-96-1/13982-7

7440-61-1

1.00

1.00

1.00

Units

+/-59.5

+/-40.6

+/-46.7

Uncert



Page 46 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

48 of 66



Sample Summary

Page 1 of 1





4.22E+05 97500 397


Strontium Carrier 93 (40%-110%)


Method: SRTOT_SEP_PRECIP_GPC GL-RAD-A-004Batch ID: 1706640Instrument: PIC9B

60 min

SOP Ref:Run Date: 10/18/2017 17:19 Analyst: JXB7

1 mLAliquot:

Units

pCi/L

B3F969Client ID:

Prep Date: 10/18/2017 00:00

Result Nominal

7.30 7.85 mg

1706640 EPA 905.0 Modified/DOE RP50

"As Received"

Prep Method:

Prep Basis:

TPU MDC

Count Time:

Comments:


Prep Batch:S1706640r1.xlsData File:

Total StrontiumSR-RAD 2.00

Units

+/-5500

Uncert



Page 47 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

49 of 66



Sample Summary

Page 1 of 1





1.20E+06 1.05E+05 496



Method: 901.1_GAMMA_GS GL-RAD-A-013Batch ID: 1706626Instrument: WELL

120 min


0.2 LAliquot:

Units

pCi/L

B3F970Client ID:

Prep Date: 10/09/2017 00:00

Result Nominal

1706626 EPA 901.1

"As Received"

Prep Method:

Prep Basis:

TPU MDC

Count Time:

Comments:



Cesium-13710045-97-3 15.0

Units

+/-3390

Uncert



Page 48 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

50 of 66



Sample Summary

Page 1 of 1





7110 1010 46.6


Curium-243/244 Tracer 99.5 (30%-105%)



240 min


0.001 LAliquot:

Units

pCi/L

B3F970Client ID:

Prep Date: 10/18/2017 00:00

Result Nominal

2490 2500 pCi/L

1706632 DOE EML HASL-300, Am-05

"As Received"

Prep Method:

Prep Basis:

TPU MDC

Count Time:

Comments:



Americium-24114596-10-2 1.00

Units

+/-457

Uncert



Page 49 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

51 of 66



Sample Summary

Page 1 of 1





1160

8400

257

1400

61.1

53.8


Plutonium-236 Tracer 84.5 (30%-105%)



239.9998 min


0.001 LAliquot:

Units

pCi/L

pCi/L

B3F970Client ID:

Prep Date: 10/18/2017 00:00

Result Nominal

1130 1340 pCi/L

1706636 DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-11-

"As Received"

Prep Method:

Prep Basis:

TPU MDC

Count Time:

Comments:



Plutonium-238

Plutonium-239/240

13981-16-3

OER-100-70

1.00

1.00

Units

+/-183

+/-485

Uncert



Page 50 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

52 of 66



Sample Summary

Page 1 of 1





88.2

19.6

63.4

U

63.4

38.6

54.6

63.1

53.3

59.3


Uranium-232 Tracer 84.4 (30%-105%)



240 min


0.001 LAliquot:

Units

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

B3F970Client ID:

Prep Date: 10/18/2017 00:00

Result Nominal

1760 2080 pCi/L

1706639 DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-R

"As Received"

Prep Method:

Prep Basis:

TPU MDC

Count Time:

Comments:


Prep Batch:S0434194003_UU.1B.gcnfData File:

Uranium-233/234

Uranium-235/236

Uranium-238

13968-55-3/13966-29-5

U-233/234

15117-96-1/13982-7

7440-61-1

1.00

1.00

1.00

Units

+/-62.0

+/-38.5

+/-53.8

Uncert



Page 51 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

53 of 66



Sample Summary

Page 1 of 1





6.55E+05 1.51E+05 490


Strontium Carrier 86.6 (40%-110%)


Method: SRTOT_SEP_PRECIP_GPC GL-RAD-A-004Batch ID: 1706640Instrument: PIC9C

60 min


1 mLAliquot:

Units

pCi/L

B3F970Client ID:

Prep Date: 10/18/2017 00:00

Result Nominal

6.80 7.85 mg


"As Received"

Prep Method:

Prep Basis:

TPU MDC

Count Time:

Comments:




Units

+/-7140

Uncert



Page 52 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

54 of 66



Sample Summary

Page 1 of 1





8.67E+05 1.78E+05 33100




15 min


1 mLAliquot:

Units

pCi/L

B3F970Client ID:

Prep Date: 10/18/2017 00:00

Result Nominal


"As Received"

Prep Method:

Prep Basis:

TPU MDC

Count Time:

Comments:



Tritium10028-17-8 100

Units

+/-59300

Uncert



Page 53 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

55 of 66



Sample Summary

Page 1 of 1





1130 138 28.6



Method: 901.1_GAMMA_GS GL-RAD-A-013Batch ID: 1706626Instrument: GAM08

90 min


0.2 LAliquot:

Units

pCi/L

B3F971Client ID:

Prep Date: 10/09/2017 00:00

Result Nominal

1706626 EPA 901.1

"As Received"

Prep Method:

Prep Basis:

TPU MDC

Count Time:

Comments:



Cesium-13710045-97-3 15.0

Units

+/-99.8

Uncert



Page 54 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

56 of 66



Sample Summary

Page 1 of 1





68.2 47.7 39.7


Curium-243/244 Tracer 103 (30%-105%)



240 min


0.001 LAliquot:

Units

pCi/L

B3F971Client ID:

Prep Date: 10/18/2017 00:00

Result Nominal

2570 2500 pCi/L

1706632 DOE EML HASL-300, Am-05

"As Received"

Prep Method:

Prep Basis:

TPU MDC

Count Time:

Comments:



Americium-24114596-10-2 1.00

Units

+/-46.9

Uncert



Page 55 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

57 of 66



Sample Summary

Page 1 of 1





10.5

59.8

U

U

28.9

52.8

50.0

63.4


Plutonium-236 Tracer 80 (30%-105%)



239.9998 min


0.001 LAliquot:

Units

pCi/L

pCi/L

B3F971Client ID:

Prep Date: 10/18/2017 00:00

Result Nominal

1070 1340 pCi/L

1706636 DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-11-

"As Received"

Prep Method:

Prep Basis:

TPU MDC

Count Time:

Comments:



Plutonium-238

Plutonium-239/240

13981-16-3

OER-100-70

1.00

1.00

Units

+/-28.8

+/-51.8

Uncert



Page 56 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

58 of 66



Sample Summary

Page 1 of 1





-11.5

0.00

7.51

U

U

U

31.1

24.7

28.2

82.8

36.6

47.4


Uranium-232 Tracer 87.2 (30%-105%)



240 min


0.001 LAliquot:

Units

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

B3F971Client ID:

Prep Date: 10/18/2017 00:00

Result Nominal

1810 2080 pCi/L

1706639 DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-R

"As Received"

Prep Method:

Prep Basis:

TPU MDC

Count Time:

Comments:


Prep Batch:S0434194004_UU.1A.gcnfData File:

Uranium-233/234

Uranium-235/236

Uranium-238

13968-55-3/13966-29-5

U-233/234

15117-96-1/13982-7

7440-61-1

1.00

1.00

1.00

Units

+/-31.1

+/-24.6

+/-28.2

Uncert



Page 57 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

59 of 66



Sample Summary

Page 1 of 1





1120 436 466


Strontium Carrier 101 (40%-110%)


Method: SRTOT_SEP_PRECIP_GPC GL-RAD-A-004Batch ID: 1706640Instrument: LB4100E2

60 min


1 mLAliquot:

Units

pCi/L

B3F971Client ID:

Prep Date: 10/18/2017 00:00

Result Nominal

7.90 7.85 mg


"As Received"

Prep Method:

Prep Basis:

TPU MDC

Count Time:

Comments:




Units

+/-347

Uncert



Page 58 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

60 of 66



Sample Summary

Page 1 of 1





8.63E+05 1.77E+05 33900




15 min


1 mLAliquot:

Units

pCi/L

B3F971Client ID:

Prep Date: 10/18/2017 00:00

Result Nominal


"As Received"

Prep Method:

Prep Basis:

TPU MDC

Count Time:

Comments:



Tritium10028-17-8 100

Units

+/-60000

Uncert



Page 59 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

61 of 66

Quality ControlSummary

Page 60 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

62 of 66

QC Summary


High Rad Testing1706626

1706632

1706636

Batch

Batch

Batch

Cesium-137

Cesium-137

Americium-241

Cobalt-60

Cesium-137

Americium-241

Curium-243/244 Tracer

Americium-241


Americium-241


Plutonium-238

Parmname


CH2MHill Plateau Remediation CompanyClient :MSIN R3-50 CHPRC

Richland, Washington


Units

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

Analyst Date Time

JXC5

AXM6

AXM6

10/14/17

10/13/17

10/14/17

10/19/17

10/19/17

10/23/17

10/19/17

09:57

19:12

09:58

09:31

09:31

10:39

13:33

QC

1.59

8.24E+05

3.10E+05

66400

1.03E+05

13.7

2420

5080

2540

2150

2270

12.5

NOM Sample

8.19E+05

4990

2640

Range

(80%-120%)

(80%-120%)

(80%-120%)

(30%-105%)

(30%-105%)

(80%-120%)

(30%-105%)

Qual

U

U

U

QC1203889225

QC1203889226 434194002

QC1203889227

QC1203889239

QC1203889240 434194002

QC1203889241

QC1203889251

99352

108

109

109

97

102

109

91

2.88E+05

60800

94900

2500

2500

1970

2500

MB

DUP

LCS

MB

DUP

LCS

MB

434194Workorder:

PO Box 1600

**

**

**

+/-2820

+/-368

+/-259

+/-15.4

+/-2800

+/-6290

+/-2000

+/-2110

+/-26.9

+/-272

+/-406

+/-283

+/-186

+/-199

+/-28.3

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

+/-71800

+/-718

+/-403

+/-15.4

+/-72300

+/-30500

+/-6750

+/-8850

+/-27.0

+/-420

+/-783

+/-435

+/-292

+/-329

1

2

RPD:

RPD:

(0%-20%)

(0%-20%)

0.0943

0.165

RER:

RER:

(0-2)

(0-2)

REC:

REC:

REC:

REC:

REC:

REC:

REC:

QC Criteria

Page 1 of 4

Page 61 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

63 of 66

QC Summary



1706639

Batch

Batch

Plutonium-239/240

Plutonium-236 Tracer

Plutonium-238

Plutonium-239/240


Plutonium-238

Plutonium-239/240


Uranium-233/234

Uranium-235/236

Uranium-238

Uranium-232 Tracer

Uranium-233/234

Uranium-235/236

Uranium-238

Parmname Units

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

Analyst Date Time

AXM6

10/24/17

10/18/17

10/19/17

10:10

21:26

10:25

QC

-4.72

1070

751

5040

1310

26.5

2120

886

36.8

39.2

15.9

1660

94.5

3.18

45.9

NOM Sample

861

5950

1130

91.9

30.9

54.3

Range

(30%-105%)

(30%-105%)

(80%-120%)

(30%-105%)

(30%-105%)

Qual

U

U

U

U

U

U

QC1203889252 434194002

QC1203889253

QC1203889258

QC1203889259 434194002

80

98

108

67

80

1330

1340

1970

1330

2080

DUP

LCS

MB

DUP

434194Workorder:

**

**

**

**

U

+/-149

+/-388

+/-186

+/-59.5

+/-40.6

+/-46.7

+/-21.3

+/-189

+/-134

+/-339

+/-176

+/-29.0

+/-208

+/-171

+/-48.4

+/-49.6

+/-31.2

+/-272

+/-63.0

+/-33.2

+/-44.3

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

+/-197

+/-968

+/-273

+/-60.9

+/-40.9

+/-28.4

+/-21.4

+/-277

+/-171

+/-794

+/-260

+/-29.2

+/-363

+/-253

+/-48.7

+/-50.0

+/-31.3

+/-416

+/-64.5

+/-33.3

14

17

3

77

17

RPD:

RPD:

RPD:

RPD:

RPD:

(0%-20%)

(0%-20%)

(0% - 100%)

N/A

(0% - 100%)

0.826

1.44

0.0561

1.03

RER:

RER:

RER:

RER:

(0-2)

(0-2)

(0-2)

(0-2)

REC:

REC:

REC:

REC:

REC:

QC Criteria

Page 2 of 4

Page 62 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

64 of 66

QC Summary



1706640

1706641

Batch

Batch

Batch

Uranium-232 Tracer

Uranium-233/234

Uranium-235/236

Uranium-238

Uranium-232 Tracer

Total Strontium

Strontium Carrier

Total Strontium

Strontium Carrier

Total Strontium

Strontium Carrier

Tritium

Tritium

Tritium

Tritium

Parmname Units

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

mg

pCi/L

mg

pCi/L

mg

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

pCi/L

Analyst Date Time

JXB7

JXC5

10/18/17

10/18/17

10/18/17

10/19/17

10/19/17

10/19/17

10/19/17

21:26

17:19

17:19

10:02

10:18

10:34

10:50

QC

1890

2760

210

2840

1820

-82.9

7.30

4.17E+05

7.10

20700

7.70

-14700

8.06E+05

9.82E+05

1.02E+05

NOM Sample

1890

4.22E+05

7.30

8.72E+05

8.72E+05

Range

(30%-105%)

(80%-120%)

(30%-105%)

(40%-110%)

(40%-110%)

(80%-120%)

(40%-110%)

(75%-125%)

(80%-120%)

Qual

U

U

QC1203889260

QC1203889261

QC1203889262 434194002

QC1203889263

QC1203889265

QC1203889266 434194001

QC1203889267 434194001

QC1203889268

91

105

87

93

90

87

98

100

93

2080

2690

2080

7.85

7.85

23700

7.85

1.10E+05

1.10E+05

LCS

MB

DUP

LCS

MB

DUP

MS

LCS

434194Workorder:

**

**

**

**

**

+/-261

+/-5500

+/-59600

+/-59600

+/-274

+/-305

+/-95.5

+/-306

+/-265

+/-165

+/-5620

+/-1220

+/-16200

+/-57900

+/-63400

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

Uncert:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

TPU:

+/-47.3

+/-401

+/-97500

+/-1.79E+05

+/-1.79E+05

+/-44.9

+/-418

+/-504

+/-100

+/-514

+/-406

+/-165

+/-96200

+/-4930

+/-16200

+/-1.66E+05

+/-2.00E+05

1

8

RPD:

RPD:

(0%-20%)

(0%-20%)

0.251

0.0744

0.527

RER:

RER:

RER:

(0-2)

(0-2)

(0-2)

REC:

REC:

REC:

REC:

REC:

REC:

REC:

REC:

REC:

QC Criteria

Page 3 of 4

Page 63 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

65 of 66

QC Summary


High Rad Testing1706641Batch

Parmname

Page 4 of 4

Units Analyst Date TimeQCNOM Sample RangeQual

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:

434194Workorder:

<

>

B

B

C

D

N

U

UX

X

Y

Z

Sample is below the EPA guidance level for Reactive Releasable Cyanide and/or Reactive Releasable Sulfide


The analyte was detected at a value less than the contract required detection limit (RDL), but greater than or equal to the IDL/MDL (as appropriate).

The associated QC sample blank has a result >= 2X the MDA and, after corrections, result is >= MDA for this sample

Target analyte was detected in the sample and the associated blank. The associated blank concentration is >= EQL or is > 5% of the measuredconcentration and/or decision level for associated samples.Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of sample.



Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification




N/A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPD not applicable.** Indicates analyte is a surrogate compound.^ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptence criteria when the sample is greater than five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +/-the RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.

Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of therequirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.

+/-26800Uncert: TPU: +/-33300

Notes:


QC Criteria

Page 64 of 64

OCTOBER 30, 2017

66 of 66

october 30, 2017 - hanford site

Documents