observational, radiative and dynamical implications of ...susan hovde & adrian tuck crystal-face...

43
Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of Scale Invariance Near the Tropical Tropopause Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003

Upload: others

Post on 26-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of Scale

Invariance Near the Tropical Tropopause

Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck

CRYSTAL-FACE Science MeetingSalt Lake City, February 2003

Page 2: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

Scaling Exponent H1

• Start with signal f(t).• The first order structure function associated with f is

where the independent variable r is called the “lag”.• Plot log(S1) vs. log(r). If the points describe a relatively

straight line, then f scales, and H1 is given by the slope of the line.

• H1 ranges from 0 to 1.– Values near 1: “persistence”, positive neighbor-to-

neighbor correlation.– Values near 0: “anti-persistence”, negative neighbor-to-

neighbor correlation.

S1 r; f( )= f t + r( )− f t( )

Page 3: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

H1 for Air Along Aircraft Flight Tracks

• H1 is related to spectral exponent β by β = 2H1+1.• Kolmogorov theory predicts β = 5/3 for the atmosphere in

the horizontal direction, corresponding to Hh = 1/3. • Bolgiano’s arguments predict β = 11/5 in the vertical

direction, corresponding to Hv = 3/5.• Even in “level” flight, an aircraft samples a mix of the

horizontal and vertical structure of the atmosphere.• The scaling exponent along an aircraft flight track is given

by Hz = Hh/Hv = 5/9 ≈ 0.56.• Empirically, we see a slightly lower value, possibly due to

the inertia of the aircraft. (Under investigation.)

Page 4: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

WAM 19980511 WB57

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

O3

(ppb

v)

70x103656055Time (seconds UTC)

420

400

380

360

340

320

300

Potential Tem

perature (K)

374 K ± 5 K

418 K ± 6 K

Page 5: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

WAM WB57F 19980511

1.6

1.2

0.8

0.4

log 1

0(M

omen

t)

3210log10(Time Interval Length)

220

200

180

160

140

Ozo

ne (

ppbv

)

62x103

60585654Time (UTC Seconds)

Tropospheric Segment

2.0

1.6

1.2

0.8

log 1

0(M

omen

t)

3210log10(Time Interval Length)

H1 = 0.39±0.05

700

600

500

400

300

Ozo

ne (

ppbv

)

70x103

686664Time (UTC Seconds)

Stratospheric Segment

Page 6: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

Synthetic Signal

-4.0-3.5-3.0-2.5-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.5

Log(

K(q

,η))

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0Log(η)

α = 1.66 ± 0.12

0.20

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.00

K(q

)

3.53.02.52.01.51.00.50.0q

C1 = 0.025 ± 0.002

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

log 1

0(M

omen

t)

3.53.02.52.01.51.00.50.0log10(Time Interval Length)

H1 = 0.50±0.03

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

f(t)

40003000200010000t

Page 7: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

Synthetic Signal Plus 10% Gaussian Noise

-3.5-3.0-2.5-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.5

Log(

K(q

,η))

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0Log(η)

α = 1.64 ± 0.17

0.25

0.20

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.00

K(q

)

3.53.02.52.01.51.00.50.0q

C1 = 0.027 ± 0.002

1.6

1.5

1.4

1.3

1.2

1.1

log 1

0(M

omen

t)

3.53.02.52.01.51.00.50.0log10(Time Interval Length)

H1 = 0.29±0.02

H1 = 0.02±0.02-80

-40

0

40

f(t)+

nois

e

40003000200010000t

Page 8: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

WAM WB57F 19980501 MTP Isentrope Curtain

Page 9: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

WAM WB57F 19980501 minlat-begindescent

-1.0-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.20.00.2

log 1

0(M

omen

t)

3210log10(Time Interval Length)

H1 = 0.30±0.07 0.40.30.20.10.0

PDF

98765Water (ppmv)

98765W

ater

(pp

mv)

68x103

6664Time (UTC Seconds)

20x10-3

1510

50

PDF

400300200100Ozone (ppmv)

2.01.61.20.8

log 1

0(M

omen

t)

3210log10(Time Interval Length)

H1 = 0.35±0.07400

300

200

100Ozo

ne (

ppbv

)

68x103

6664Time (UTC Seconds)

Page 10: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

WAM WB57F 19980501 minlat-begindescent

1.51.00.50.0

-0.5-1.0lo

g 10(

Mom

ent)

3210log10(Time Interval Length)

H1 = 0.65±0.06

0.20

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.00

PDF

210205200195Temperature (K)

205

200

195

Tem

pera

ture

(K

)

68x103

6664Time (UTC Seconds)

-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.51.0

log 1

0(M

omen

t)

3210log10(Time Interval Length)

H1 = 0.70±0.02

80x10-3

60

40

20

PDF

5040302010Wind Speed (m/s)

5040

3020

10Win

d Sp

eed

(m/s

)

68x103

6664Time (UTC Seconds)

Page 11: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

ACCENT 19990921 WB57

40

30

20

10

0

Nav

Rec

orde

r Win

d S

peed

(m

/s)

76x10374727068666462Time (seconds UTC)

360

350

340

330

320

310

300

Potential Tem

perature (K)

360 K ± 3 K

Page 12: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

19990921 Scaling Exponents

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

log(

<|f(

x+r)

- f(x

)|> )

43210log( r )

TemperatureH1 = 0.55 ± 0.041.0

0.5

0.0

-0.5

log(

<|f(

x+r)

- f(x

)|> )

43210log( r )

Wind SpeedH1 = 0.48 ± 0.04

0.8

0.4

0.0

-0.4

log(

<|f(

x+r)

- f(x

)|> )

43210log( r )

Total H2OH1 = 0.31 ± 0.05

1.6

1.2

0.8

0.4log(

<|f(

x+r)

- f(x

)|> )

43210log( r )

OzoneH1 = 0.34 ± 0.04

Page 13: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

Flight Segments Included In AnalysisAircraft Date

yyyymmddSegmentduration(s)

Coordinates (ºlat, ºlon) Segmentcenter time(UTCs)

Approximate mean θ (K)

ER-2 19870203 6971 (14ºS,129ºE) (18ºS, 117ºE) 91635 412ER-2 19870814 6845 (7ºN, 79ºW) (5ºS, 78ºW) 48470 391ER-2 19941026 8207 (15ºN, 158ºW)(1ºN,159ºW) 76878 410WB57F 19980409 7017 (28ºN, 93ºW) (17ºN, 84ºW) 59534 368WB57F 19980409 5943 (19ºN, 85ºW) (27ºN, 91ºW) 66911 413WB57F 19980501 8209 (28ºN, 94ºW) (14ºN, 95ºW) 57962 362WB57F 19980501 7242 (13ºN, 95ºW) (26ºN, 95ºW) 66259 370WB57F 19980504 7926 (14ºN, 95ºW) (28ºN, 95ºW) 68442 420WB57F 19980507 5144 (30ºN, 93ºW) (33ºN, 83ºW) 56910 373WB57F 19980511 8872 (28ºN, 95ºW) (11ºN, 95ºW) 58357 374WB57F 19980511 8052 (13ºN, 95ºW) (28ºN, 95ºW) 67906 418WB57F 19990920 13525 (28ºN, 87ºW) (5ºN, 94ºW) 46669 362WB57F 19990921 10992 (13ºN, 82ºW) (28ºN, 94ºW) 68936 360WB57F 20020726 3125 (22ºN, 86ºW) (17ºN, 84ºW) 63738 369

Page 14: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

Calculations of H1

Segmentduration(s)

H1(H2O) H1(O3) H1([u2+v2]1/2) H1(T)

6971 - 0.34 ± 0.07 - 0.49 ± 0.036845 - - 0.35 ± 0.04 0.34 ± 0.048207 - 0.37 ± 0.04 0.49 ± 0.07 0.52 ± 0.027017 - - 0.56 ± 0.07 0.66 ± 0.025943 - 0.43 ± 0.05 0.36 ± 0.04 0.61 ± 0.038209 0.43 ± 0.05 0.51 ± 0.08 0.64 ± 0.06 0.65 ± 0.047242 0.30 ± 0.07 0.35 ± 0.07 0.65 ± 0.06 0.70 ± 0.027926 - 0.48 ± 0.10 0.36 ± 0.05 0.59 ± 0.035144 0.35 ± 0.05 0.51 ± 0.09 0.56 ± 0.03 -8872 - - 0.57 ± 0.06 0.65 ± 0.048052 - 0.39 ± 0.05 0.43 ± 0.04 0.62 ± 0.0313525 0.26 ± 0.04 0.37 ± 0.06 - 0.47 ± 0.0910992 0.31 ± 0.04 0.33 ± 0.04 0.48 ± 0.04 0.55 ± 0.043125 0.40 ± 0.04 0.43 ± 0.05 0.44 ± 0.08 0.47 ± 0.07

Mean 0.34 ± 0.06 0.41 ± 0.07 0.49 ± 0.11 0.56 ± 0.10

Page 15: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

CRYSTAL-FACE 20020726 WB57

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

Hor

izon

tal W

ind

Spe

ed (

m/s

)

75x103706560Time (seconds UTC)

420

400

380

360

340

Potential Tem

perature (K)

370 K ± 5 K

Page 16: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

20020726 Scaling Exponents

-0.8

-0.4

0.0

0.4

log(

<|f(

x+r)

- f(x

)|> )

3.02.52.01.51.00.50.0log( r )

Wind SpeedH1 = 0.44 ± 0.08

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

log(

<|f(

x+r)

- f(x

)|> )

3.02.52.01.51.00.50.0log( r )

TemperatureH1 = 0.47 ± 0.07

-0.8

-0.4

0.0

0.4

log(

<|f(

x+r)

- f(x

)|> )

3.02.52.01.51.00.50.0log( r )

H2O Vapor H1 = 0.40 ± 0.041.6

1.2

0.8

log(

<|f(

x+r)

- f(x

)|> )

3.02.52.01.51.00.50.0log( r )

OzoneH1 = 0.43 ± 0.05

Page 17: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

Summary

• Wind speed and temperature scale with H1 = 5/9.• Scale breaks for ozone and water on some flights

at about 20 km appear to be instrumental.• Total water, water vapor and ozone scale in the

upper troposphere, as does carbon dioxide in the lower stratosphere, but not as passive scalars, i.e. H1 ≠ 5/9. Sources and sinks are operating faster than mixing.

Page 18: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

Consequence

• Because the radiatively absorbing and emitting species scale, so must the energy input and output to the atmosphere: all scales play a role in forcing and dissipation.

• Better signal-to-noise ratio is required at high frequencies.

• Many more long, “constant level” flight tracks are needed in the troposphere, preferably with 10 Hz data.

Conclusions

Page 19: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

WAM WB57F 19980506 endascent-beginchgalt

25

20

15

10

5

0

Wat

er (

ppm

v)

59x103

58575655Time (UTC sec)

800

700

600

500

400

300

200

Ozone (ppbv)

Water

Ozone

Page 20: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

Tropopause Potential Temperature vs. Latitude

Page 21: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

AAOE ER-2 19870814 endascent-beginchgalt1

-0.70

-0.60

-0.50

log 1

0(M

omen

t)

3210log10(Time Interval Length)

2.01.51.00.50.0

PDF

4.03.63.22.8Water (ppmv)

6

5

4

3

2

Wat

er (

ppm

v)

51x103

504948474645Time (UTC Seconds)

40x10-3

302010

0

PDF

160140120Ozone (ppmv)

1.0

0.8

0.6

log 1

0(M

omen

t)

3210log10(Time Interval Length)

H1 = 0.17±0.04160

140

120Ozo

ne (

ppbv

)

51x103

504948474645Time (UTC Seconds)

Page 22: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

AAOE ER-2 19870814 endascent-beginchgalt1

-0.4

0.0

0.4

log 1

0(M

omen

t)

3210log10(Time Interval Length)

H1 = 0.35±0.04

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

PDF

199198197196Temperature (K)

199

198

197

196

Tem

pera

ture

(K

)

51x103

504948474645Time (UTC Seconds)

-0.8

-0.4

0.0

log 1

0(M

omen

t)

3210log10(Time Interval Length)

H1 = 0.34±0.04

0.250.200.150.100.050.00

PDF

1614121086Wind Speed (m/s)

16141210

86W

ind

Spee

d (m

/s)

51x103

504948474645Time (UTC Seconds)

Page 23: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

ACCENT WB57F 19990921 63441-74432

0.4

0.0

-0.4log 1

0(M

omen

t)

43210log10(Time Interval Length)

H1 = 0.31±0.04 0.200.150.100.050.00

PDF

1614121086Water (ppmv)

16

12

8

Wat

er (

ppm

v)

74x103

7270686664Time (UTC Seconds)

30x10-3

25201510

5

PDF

10080604020Ozone (ppmv)

1.6

1.2

0.8

0.4log 1

0(M

omen

t)

43210log10(Time Interval Length)

H1 = 0.33±0.0410080604020

Ozo

ne (

ppbv

)

74x103

7270686664Time (UTC Seconds)

Page 24: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

ACCENT WB57F 19990921 63441-74432

1.0

0.5

0.0

-0.5log 1

0(M

omen

t)

43210log10(Time Interval Length)

H1 = 0.48±0.04

0.30

0.20

0.10

PDF

204202200198196Temperature (K)

204202

200198196Te

mpe

ratu

re (

K)

74x103

7270686664Time (UTC Seconds)

-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.5

log 1

0(M

omen

t)

43210log10(Time Interval Length)

H1 = 0.55±0.04

0.100.080.060.040.020.00

PDF

252015105Wind Speed (m/s)

25201510

5

Win

d Sp

eed

(m/s

)

74x103

7270686664Time (UTC Seconds)

Page 25: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

WAM WB57F 19980501 minlat-begindescent Ozone

-2.5

-2.0

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

Log(

K(q

,η))

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0Log(η)

α = 1.95 ± 0.20

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

K(q

)

3.53.02.52.01.51.00.50.0q

C1 = 0.047 ± 0.002

2.0

1.6

1.2

0.8log 1

0(M

omen

t)

3210log10(Time Interval Length)

H1 = 0.35±0.07

400

300

200

100

Ozo

ne (

ppbv

)

69x103

686766656463Time (UTC Seconds)

Page 26: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

WAM WB57F 19980501 minlat-begindescent Wind Speed

-1.2

-1.0

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

Log(

K(q

,η))

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0Log(η)

α = 1.35 ± 0.63

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

-0.2

K(q

)

3.53.02.52.01.51.00.50.0q

C1 = 0.179 ± 0.010

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

-0.5

-1.0

log 1

0(M

omen

t)

3210log10(Time Interval Length)

H1 = 0.65±0.06

50

40

30

20

10

Hor

izon

tal W

ind

Spee

d (m

/s)

69x103

686766656463Time (UTC Seconds)

Page 27: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

WAM WB57F 19980501 minlat-begindescent Temperature

-2.5

-2.0

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

Log(

K(q

,η))

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0Log(η)

α = 1.72 ± 0.25

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

K(q

)

3.53.02.52.01.51.00.50.0q

C1 = 0.061 ± 0.002

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

log 1

0(M

omen

t)

3210log10(Time Interval Length)

H1 = 0.70±0.02205

200

195Tem

pera

ture

(K

)

69x103

686766656463Time (UTC Seconds)

Page 28: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

Scaling Exponents as a Function of Potential Temperature

420

410

400

390

380

370

360

Pote

ntia

l Tem

pera

ture

0.70.60.50.40.3H1

420

410

400

390

380

370

360

Pote

ntia

l Tem

pera

ture

0.160.140.120.100.080.060.04C1

420

410

400

390

380

370

360

Pote

ntia

l Tem

pera

ture

2.52.01.51.0α

temperature wind speed water ozone

Page 29: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

Water vapor and ozone along the Canberra flight track 55 N-68 N

Page 30: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

AASE ER-2 19890207 takeoff-endascent

420

400

380

360

340

320

Pote

ntia

l Tem

pera

ture

(K

)

300025002000150010005000Ozone (ppbv)

806040200Water (ppmv)

Ozone

Water

Page 31: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

19890207 Back Trajectories at 390 K Potential Temperature

Page 32: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

19620131 Potential Vorticity, 12 UTC, 375 K

Page 33: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

19620201 Potential Vorticity, 12 UTC, 375 K

Page 34: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

19620206 Potential Vorticity, 12 UTC, 375 K

Page 35: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

Ozone vs. Water, 1962 & 1989

Page 36: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

WAM WB57F 19980507 endascent-beginchgalt, 370 K

12

10

8

6

4

Wat

er (

ppm

v)

59x103

58575655Time (UTC sec)

50

40

30

20

10

Wind Speed (m

/s)

Water

Wind Speed

Page 37: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

ASHOE ER-2 19940327 Hawaii-Fiji

10 0 -10Latitude (°N)

6

5

4

3

2

Wat

er (

ppm

v)

90x103

858075Time (UTC Seconds)

450

400

350

300

Potential Temperature (K

)

1.70

1.65

1.60

1.55

1.50

Met

hane

(ppm

v)

Water

Methane

Pot Temp

Page 38: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

ASHOE ER-2 19940327 Hawaii-Fiji

5.0

4.8

4.6

4.4

4.2

4.0

3.8

Wat

er (

ppm

v)

1.701.651.601.551.50Methane (ppmv)

Outer Tropics Inner Tropics

Page 39: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

Scaling Analysisof Airborne Observations

Near the TropopauseAdrian Tuck, Susan Hovde

NOAA Aeronomy LaboratoryShaun Lovejoy

McGill UniversityDaniel Schertzer

U i ité d Pi t M i C i

Page 40: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

H1 Example (Synthetic Data)

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40f(t

)

40003000200010000t

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0log(

<|f(

x+r)

- f(x

)|> )

3.02.01.00.0log( r )

H1 = Slope = 0.50 ± 0.03

Page 41: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

-80

-40

0

40f(t

)

40003000200010000t

Effect of Adding 10% Gaussian Noise

1.6

1.5

1.4

1.3

1.2

1.1log(

<|f(

x+r)

- f(x

)|> )

3.02.01.00.0log( r )

H1 = 0.29 ± 0.02

H1 = 0.02 ± 0.02

Page 42: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

2.0

1.6

1.2

0.8log(

<|f(

x+r)

- f(x

)|> )

3210log( r )

H1 = 0.38 ± 0.05

700

600

500

400

300

O3

(ppb

v)

80006000400020000t

Stratospheric Segment

Page 43: Observational, Radiative and Dynamical Implications of ...Susan Hovde & Adrian Tuck CRYSTAL-FACE Science Meeting Salt Lake City, February 2003. Scaling Exponent H1 • Start with signal

220200

180160

140

O3

(ppb

v)

80006000400020000t

Tropospheric Segment

1.6

1.2

0.8

0.4

log(

<|f(

x+r)

- f(x

)|> )

3210log( r )

H1 = 0.69 ± 0.12

H1 = 0.15 ± 0.03