obligations, tydings and complying with cash management requirements
DESCRIPTION
Obligations, Tydings and Complying with Cash Management Requirements. Michael Brustein, Esq. [email protected] Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2013. “Take Aways” from this session…. When “obligations” matter? When “expenditures” matter? When may I begin to expend funds? - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Obligations, Tydings and Complying with Cash Management
RequirementsMichael Brustein, Esq.
[email protected] & Manasevit, PLLC
Fall Forum 2013
“Take Aways” from this session…
1. When “obligations” matter?2. When “expenditures” matter?3. When may I begin to expend funds?4. When does interest begin to accrue?5. How do I prevent the lapsing of funds?6. What are the OIG concerns on cash
management? Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 2
Basic Rule
• All grantees / subgrantees must maintain accounting records on “source” and “application” of federal funds
–34 CFR 80.20 (b)(2)
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 3
Basic Elements of Cash ManagementAwards – “GAN”Obligations – Commitments made that will
require paymentsUnobligated Balances – Portion not obligated
from grantExpenditures - Outlays / DisbursementsLiquidation – Disburse funds to satisfy
obligationsIncome – Gross income directly generated by
grant supported activityBrustein & Manasevit, PLLC 4
Question:Is the focus on “obligation” of “expenditure”?
Answer: Depends!
Consider the following eight case studies
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 5
Case Study #1
• Where a “funding period” is specified, a grantee may charge to the award only costs from “obligations” of the funding period
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 6
Case Study #2
• Under State-Administered programs, States may “obligate” if (1) Secretary may “obligate” and (2) State plan in “substantially approvable form”
–34 CFR 76.703
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 7
• A State cannot use “obligations” for matching or MOE purposes if obligations are made during a period when obligations are unallowable (black-out period)–58 Federal Register 65856, 12/16/93
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 8
Case Study #3Subgrantees may “obligate” for
“formula” programs if (1) State may “obligate” and (2) local plan is “substantially approvable”34 CFR 76.708 (a)
For competitive programs, subgrantees, may obligate after date subgrant is made34 CFR 76.708 (c)
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 9
• Under Bifurcated S/A Programs (ESEA, IDEA, Perkins), subgrantees may fund “pre-award” obligations (July 1 to September 30) retroactively, from 2nd installment (75%)
• Source: Oct 1, 2013 GAN
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 10
Case Study #4
• Carryover funds must be “obligated” in accordance with new laws, regulations, application–34 CFR 76.710
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 11
Case Study #5
• Are interest calculations based on date of “obligation” or date of “expenditure”?
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 12
QUICK TUTORIAL ON THECASH MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1990 (CMIA)
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 13
Goal of CMIA
• Improve the efficiency and effectiveness of fund transfers between the federal government and States
• Federal agencies determine if funds used for allowable purposes
• States required to ensure federal funds used solely for program purposes
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 14
• CMIA establishes the “Treasury-State Agreement”
–Methods for calculating interest and identifying federal programs subject to “Subpart A” of 31 CFR 205
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 15
What programs are subject to Subpart A?
If State total federal programs less than $10 billion, any program exceeding .60 percent of total amount.
If State total federal program is greater than $10 billion, then greater of .30 percent of total federal assistance of $60 million
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 16
• For Subpart A programs, State must minimize time elapsing between transfer from treasury and State’s “payout”
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 17
THREE DAY DRAWDOWN WINDOW
31 CFR 205.12(b)(4)
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 18
• For Subpart A programs, State interest liability accrues if federal funds are received by a State prior to the date the State “pays out” the funds–31 CFR 205.15(a)
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 19
• Subpart B programs (smaller programs) are not subject to the agreement
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 20
• Treasury requires, for Subpart B programs, State must minimize time between drawdown and disbursement, and comply with A-102 (34 CFR Part 80)
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 21
• Treasury regulations provide that States must not incur interest liability for programs under Subpart B–31 CFR 205.33(b)
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 22
But EDGAR 34 CFR 80.21(i)…
Interest earned, minus $100 annually, by grantees and subgrantees on advances shall be remitted to ED(Tab A)
No exception for LEAs or Subpart B programs
Direct conflict with Treasury
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 23
• ED calculates interest based on date of expenditures, not obligations (Tab A)
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 24
ED / CFO 9/5/13 (Tab A)
• Time between federal grant funds “drawn” and date those funds are “disbursed” expenditure
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 25
• ED/CFO Interprets “reimbursement” (34 CFR 80.21 9 (d)) as payment to grantee after evidence of outlay / disbursement.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 26
• Compliance Supplement requires costs must be paid by the recipient before reimbursement is requested.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 27
Case Study #6
• FIFO Accounting based on “obligations” –See 5/28/70 Memo (Tab B)
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 28
Case Study #7
• “Linkage” and preventing “Lapsing” based on “obligations”–Appeal of California (Tab C)
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 29
• “The legally relevant question is when the obligation arose, not in what account such obligation may have been initially recorded” (Tab C)
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 30
Case Study #8Question:How to measure the five
year statute of limitations to bar recovery?
Answer: Date of “obligation” plus five years.
“ED has consistently held that “expended” as used in the statute means “obligated.”- Appeal of the State of Michigan Docket No. 8(272)88, 9/14/89
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC31
OIG Issues on Cash Management
Council of Inspectors General for Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE)
20 Federal Agencies covering 94% of $1.2 trillion in direct federal awards covered by A-133
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 32
OIG• Request OMB require recipients and
subrecipients to provide interim financial statements
• Such statements must contain basic line item information on how federal funds are spent
• Without such interim statements pass-throughs and federal agencies cannot effectively monitor grantees
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 33
OIG - Cash Management
• Recommend specific time frames for which recipient can draw cash• Terms such as “minimize” or
“anticipated needs” are too general and not auditable
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 34
OIG - Cash Management
• Clarify the type of working capital analysis that is required of federal agencies prior to providing advance payments
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 35
OIG - Cash Management
• All recipients should account for program income using the “deduction method” unless federal agency indicates otherwise
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 36
OIG - Cash Management
• Align Circular with Compliance Supplement on “Reimbursement”
• Compliance Supplement requires that costs must be paid by the recipient before reimbursement is requested.
• Under accrual accounting, a cost could be expensed on an award that has not been paid.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 37
OIG - Cash Management
• Recommends that federal funds never be placed in non-insured depository accounts
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 38
Disclaimer
This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not
constitute legal advice. Attendance at the presentation or later review of these
printed materials does not create an attorney-client relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC. You should not take any action based upon any information in this presentation without first consulting
legal counsel familiar with your particular circumstances.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 39