obesity steering committee

19
Prioritizing Obesity Strategies Obesity Integration Steering Committee Meetings 2.29.12, 3.19.12, 4.2.12, 4.25.12

Upload: hoaglina

Post on 23-Jun-2015

1.169 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Obesity Steering Committee

Prioritizing Obesity Strategies

Obesity Integration Steering Committee Meetings2.29.12, 3.19.12, 4.2.12, 4.25.12

Page 2: Obesity Steering Committee

Prioritization ProcessWhen Purpose/Actions

Meeting 1 (2/29) • Getting Started• Agreements For Moving Forward

Between Meetings(e-input)

Initial Survey• Review/Provide Input on Proposed Criteria• Identify State Roles for Strategies

Meeting 2 (3/19)9:30am -12:30pm

• Review/Finalize Criteria

Meeting 3 (4/2)9:30am-12:30pm

• Clarify Strategies• Clarify State Roles

Between Meetings(e-input)

Prioritization Survey• Rate Strategies Using Final Criteria• Refine Concise Statement

Meeting 4 (4/25)1:30pm – 4:30pm

• Vote on Concise Statement• Share Results of Prioritization • Gather Additional Input for Ex Committee

Page 3: Obesity Steering Committee

Agenda ReviewWelcome and Overview

Vote on Concise Statement

Sharing Results of Prioritization Survey

Reflecting on Where We’ve Been and Clarifying What’s Ahead

Gathering Comments

Closure and Thank You

Page 4: Obesity Steering Committee

Decision Making ProcessDiscussion: All encouraged to participate

Decisions: For Today & Prioritization Survey

60% super majority vote, motioned by a Steering Committee Member

One vote per Steering Committee Member

Ex Committee, and other observers, do not vote

Page 5: Obesity Steering Committee

Steering Committee Voting MembersSector Team Leads or Designee (8 reps from

PSD)

Healthy Eating (2 reps from PSD)

Physical Activity (2 reps from PSD)

LHAs (5 total: 1 rep each from El Paso, Weld, Boulder, Pueblo, West-Central Partnership)

External Organizations (3 total: 1 rep each from Live Well, Kaiser, Health Foundation)

Page 6: Obesity Steering Committee

Voting on Concise Statement

Purpose: To build support for the issues with an organization, policy maker or a funding agency.

Describes the mission, internal strengths and weaknesses, external opportunities and threats, and vision.

Describes gaps between current status and desired goals.

Included: Health condition or risk factor consideredPopulation affectedSize and scope of problemPrevention opportunitiesPotential stakeholders

Page 7: Obesity Steering Committee

Sharing Results of Prioritization Survey

Page 8: Obesity Steering Committee

Top 5 Criteria1. Likelihood of Population Impact (new definition

includes reach)

2. Capacity to Implement

3. Impact of Health Disparities

4. Ability to Measure

5. Political/Community Support

Page 9: Obesity Steering Committee

Reporting of Priorities

1. Strategies Across Sectors (ranked from highest to lowest priority regardless of sector)

Strategy

Sector

Evidence Level

Population Impact (adjusted)

Capacity

Impact on HD

Ability to Measure

Support

Total Score

Potential CDPHE Roles

2. Strategies Within Sectors (ranked from highest to lowest priority within each sector)

Strategy

Evidence Level

Population Impact (adjusted)

Capacity Impact on HD

Ability to Measure

Support

Total Score

Potential CDPHE Roles

Sector A

Strategy

Evidence Level

Population Impact (adjusted)

Capacity Impact on HD

Ability to Measure

Support

Total Score

Potential CDPHE Roles

Sector B

Page 10: Obesity Steering Committee

Reflecting on Where We’ve Been and Clarifying What’s Ahead

Page 11: Obesity Steering Committee

PSD Obesity Project Charter: Key Activities Accomplished1. Community assessment

2. Data presentation quantifying the issue

3. Sector teams searched literature (“boot camp”)

4. Steering Committee approved concise statement (in this meeting)

5. Sector teams rated literature

6. Sector teams submitted literature libraries and ratings to Steering Committee

7. Steering Committee prioritized strategies

Page 12: Obesity Steering Committee

PSD Obesity Project Charter: Next Key Activities8. Executive Committee reviews and approves prioritized

strategies

9. Executive Committee and Steering Committee refer highly rated and prioritized strategies to sector teams.

o Sector teams form implementation teams for selected strategieso Invite stakeholders to participant on teamso Similar to the MCH processo Implementation teams consider:

Applicability to Colorado Resources needed Consultation with sector teams and/or partners Future evidence

Page 13: Obesity Steering Committee

Gathering Comments

Page 14: Obesity Steering Committee

Gathering Comments

Three waysIndividuallySmall GroupLarge Group

What recommendations do you have for the Executive Committee and/or Implementation Teams moving forward?

Page 15: Obesity Steering Committee

Gathering Comments (part 1)

What recommendations do you have for the Executive Committee and/or Implementation Teams moving forward?

Individually – Write down your thoughts (5 min)

Page 16: Obesity Steering Committee

Gathering Comments (part 1)

What recommendations do you have for the Executive Committee and/or Implementation Teams moving forward?

When the chime rings, we’ll form groups of 4-5 people by counting off 1-4 Discuss and chart your comments for the

Executive Committee and/or Implementation Teams (20 min)

Assign a spokesperson You will share these with the larger group

Page 17: Obesity Steering Committee

Gathering Comments (part 2)

What recommendations do you have for the Executive Committee and/or Implementation Teams moving forward?

What key themes do you see emerging from the small group recommendations?

Page 18: Obesity Steering Committee

Gathering Comments (part 2)

What recommendations do you have for the Executive Committee and/or Implementation Teams moving forward?

What else is on your mind?

Page 19: Obesity Steering Committee

Closure and Thank YouReminder

Hopes from Meeting #1Evaluation to follow

Thank you