nutrient uptake and distribution - tfrec.wsu.edu · nutrient uptake and distribution massimo...
TRANSCRIPT
2015 WSU Fruit School Physiology of Apple and Pear
17-18 November 2015
Nutrient uptake
and distribution
Massimo Tagliavini and Damiano Zanotelli
Introduction
• Nutrient availability in tree organs are necessary to adequately support vegetative growth and productivity.
• Both nutrient deficiencies and excesses should be avoided to reconcile economic and ecological aspects of sustainability in fruit production.
2005 2008 2011 2013
Urea 210 500 410 320
Ammonium
phosphate
250 900 600 450
Triple
phosphate
200 850 520 380
Potassium
chlroride
180 550 420 380
REFERENCE PRICE FOR SELECTED FERTILISERS IN THE
INTERNATIONAL MARKET ($/t)
Nutrient uptake
• Nutrient uptake rates depend on environmental (soil) and
tree internal factors
• An increase in soil nutrient availability normally increases
uptake (especially true for N)
• Adequate root density (and new roots) and root C
availability needed to support nutrient uptake
Source of nutrients for tree growh and
production
• Soil «native» fertility and fertilisers provides nutrients for
root uptake
• Foliar nutrient supply might contribute to fulfil the nutrient
needs (to different extent depending on the type of
nutrient)
• In spring, nutrients remobilised from storage organs
support N metabolism during early vegetative growth
phases, flowering and fruit set
Remobilized N supports the early vegetative and
reproductive stages in apple (Neilsen et al., 1997) and
pear (Tagliavini et al., 1997)
Nitrogen uptake (1)
• Both NH4+ and NO3
- absorbed by apple and pear roots
(Tromp and Ovaa, 1979)
• NH4+ sometimes taken up preferentially as compared to
NO3- (Mota et al. 2011)
• NO3- uptake stimulates shoot growth more than NH4
+
uptake, but the latter is sometimes reported as having
positive effect on flower bud formation (Gao et al., 1992).
Nitrogen uptake (2)
• Presence of both NH4+ and NO3
- in soil is often beneficial
(evidences from other fruit crops).
• Not always easy to control NH4+ : NO3
- ratio in soil due to
microbial transformation of the N molecules.
• The higher the uptake, the higher the growth and the
higher the uptake needs for other nutrients as well!
Phosphorus (P) uptake rate by apple roots as affected by their
age (Bouma et al. 2001)
Root age (days)
Rela
tive P
upta
ke
rate
The need for nutrient uptake ultimately
depend on
• Vegetative and reproductive tree growth
• Specific needs (concentrations) of single organs
Tagliavini, Failla and Xiloyannis, 2012
Pome fruit mineral concentrations
• Pome fruits (apple and pear) mainly contain water and
carbohydrates and are low in protein and therefore are
relatively low in N (0.5-0.8 kg/t F.W.)
• Their Ca, P and Mg concentration is low (approx. 0.05-
0.1 kg/t F.W.)
• But they contain relatively high concentrations of K (1.4-
1.6 kg/t F.W.)
Nutrient concentration (on D.W. basis) ranges of main apple organs
Organs N % P % K % Ca % Mg %
Leaves (July) 2.10 - 3.07 0.16 - 0.32 1.19 - 2.37 1.20 - 2.00 0.18 - 0.36
Leaves (senescent)0.78 - 0.94 0.11 - 0.13 1.46 - 1.56 2.35 - 2.65 0.40 - 0.44
Fruits0.19- 0.29 0.07 - 0.08 0.65 – 1.05 0.04 - 0.05 0.03 - 0.05
Woody organs0.45 - 0.88 0.06 - 0.15 0.29 - 0.45 0.58 - 1.18 0.06 - 0.13
Roots0.74 - 0.78 0.19 - 0.21 0.44 - 0.48 0.99 - 1.07 0.16 - 0.18
Example of total annual new biomass in apple trees and its partitioning to fruits in two years (cv. Fuji on M9 with fruit yields
around 60-65 t fresh weight ha-1)
Apple tree growth rate along the season (data from Zanotelli e al. 2013 and 2015)
Accumulation of N in apple fruits and shoots
Accumulation of P in apple fruits and shoots
Accumulation of K in apple fruits and shoots
Accumulation of Ca in apple fruits and shoots
Accumulation of Mg in apple fruits and shoots
Period
(DaFB)
BIOMASS
mg D.W.
/day
N
mg/day
P
mg/day
K
mg/day
Ca
mg/day
Mg
mg/day
0-36 90 1.90 0.19 1.72 0.63 0.18
37- 81 280 2.45 0.39 3.63 1.36 0.28
82-117 320 1.52 0.22 2.79 0.58 0.15
118-158 260 0.88 0.17 1.63 0.26 0.07
Biomass accumulation and influx rates of nutrients in apple bourse shoots (with one fruit) from ful bloom (day 0 ) to harvest (day 158) (average of Golden del. and
Nicoter. Zanotelli et al., 2014)
Yearly new biomass and N uptakeby apple and pear trees
Organs
Biomass (t D.W./ha) N (kg/ha)
Pear(Abbè F.) 35 t/ha
Apple (Fuji)
60 t /ha
Apple (Gala)
40 t /ha
Pear(Abbè F.) 35 t/ha
Apple (Fuji)
60 t /ha
Apple (Gala)
40 t /ha
Leaves (senescent) 2 2 2 19 19 16
Fruits 6 10 6 16 28 16New woody organs
(above ground) 5 2 4 27 17 23
Roots 2 3 1 7 19 10
Total 15 17 13 69 83 65
OrgansN
(kg/ha)P
(kg/ha)K
(kg/ha)Ca
(kg/ha)Mg
(kg/ha)
Leaves (abscised) 19 2 15 28 2
Fruits 16 5 39 4 4
Woody organs (aboveground) 27 3 5 42 7
Roots 7 1 8 22 3
Total 69 11 74 96 16
Yearly nutrient uptake by pear trees (cv. Abbè Fetel). Data areaverges of three rootstocks – average yields 35 t/ha.
Tagliavini and Quartieri, 2008
Different N concentration of apple leaves asaffected by the genotype
Nit
roge
n (
% o
f d
ry w
eig
ht)
Days after full bloom
Source: Beratungsring Manual Boden und Pflanzenernhärung in Obstbau, Weinbau und Bioanbau, 2004
Foliar uptake versus soil uptake
Foliar uptake alone is inadequate to meet the magnitude of
plant demand from macronutrients, but can complement root
uptake.
If soils are well endowed with Ca, but Ca-related disorders
occur, then direct uptake of Ca by fruit cuticle can solve the
problem.
Bitter pit disorder
Courtesy Neilsen G., 2001
Foliar uptake versus soil uptake
Foliar uptake alone is inadequate to meet the magnitude of
plant demand from macronutrients, but can complement root
uptake.
If soils are well endowed with Ca, but Ca-related disorders
occur, then direct uptake of Ca by fruit cuticle can solve the
problem.
Foliar absorbed micronutrients represent an important way to
supply them, due to
– Small amounts requested
– Low availability of micronutrients in many soils
– Soil deficiency and toxicity thresholds often very close
When foliar uptake is likely to be effective
1. At growth resumption in spring, when remobilization has finished and root uptake is suboptimal
2. During the growing season, when nutrient soil availability does not meet nutrient demand
3. When we see symptoms or analysis show deficiencies that need to be quickly overcome
4. When the nutrient is unavailable if soil-applied (es. when no irrigation is available)
5. In late summer to rebuilt nutrient reserves, for those nutrients with phloem mobility
Final remarks
• Nutrient partitioning affects the fate of the absorbed nutrients
treeFramework
“woody
Organs“”
leaves
abscised leavespruning wood
fruits
SOIL
uptake
Uptake and partitioning Fluxes at “Tree scale”
Nutrients contained in decomposing leaves are released and
become available again for uptake
Tagliavini et al., 2007
Final remarks
• Nutrient partitioning affects the fate of the absorbed nutrients
• Nutrient uptake dynamics data should be used together with tools able to assess soil nutrient availability to fine tune the fertilisers supply in order to match nutrient needs and nutrient availability.
THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION