numerical simulations of liquefaction phenomena after emilia romagna (20 may 2012) earthquake

32
Numerical simulations of liquefaction phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) earthquake D. Forcellini, S. Gobbi and G. Guerra Università di San Marino [email protected]

Upload: openseesdays

Post on 25-Jun-2015

173 views

Category:

Engineering


5 download

DESCRIPTION

Presentation made by Dr Davide Forcellini @ University of Porto during the OpenSees Days Portugal 2014 workshop

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

Numerical simulations of liquefaction

phenomena after Emilia Romagna

(20 May 2012) earthquake

D. Forcellini, S. Gobbi and G. Guerra

Università di San Marino

[email protected]

Page 2: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

OPENSEES PL

Page 3: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

INCOHERENT SOILS

Page 4: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

INCOHERENT SOILS

Page 5: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

COHESIVE SOILS

Page 6: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

CASE STUDY

Page 7: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

CASE STUDY

Page 8: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

CASE STUDY

Page 9: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

CASE STUDY

Page 10: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake
Page 11: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

TRADITIONAL METHODS

Page 12: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

TRADITIONAL METHODS(Youd and Perkins 1978)

Page 13: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

CASE STUDY

Page 14: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

CLAY MATERIALS

Page 15: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

SAND MATERIALS

Page 16: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

INPUT MOTION

-0.17-0.16-0.15-0.14-0.13-0.12-0.11-0.10-0.09-0.08-0.07-0.06-0.05-0.04-0.03-0.02-0.010.000.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.100.110.120.130.140.150.16

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Acc

ele

razi

on

e (g

)

t (s)

Accelerogramma L1

Page 17: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

FEM DEFINITION

Page 18: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS

Page 19: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

FINITE ELEMENTS

Page 20: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

CALIBRATION

(1558 nodes, 1224 elements) (1911 nodes, 1520 elements)(825 nodes, 616 elements)

Page 21: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

CALIBRATION

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

EP

P (

kP

a)

t (s)

EPP (5.55 m)

Mesh 01 Mesh 03 Mesh 04

Page 22: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

CALIBRATION

0.00

0.01

0.01

0.02

0.02

0.03

0.03

0.04

0.04

0.05

0.05

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Top

. D

isp

l. (

m)

t (s)

TOP DISPLACEMENT

Mesh 01 Mesh 03 Mesh 04

Page 23: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

EP

P (

kP

a)

t (s)

Excess Pore Pressure at 3.70 m

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

EP

P (

kP

a)

t (s)

Excess Pore Pressure at 5.55 m

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

EP

P (

kP

a)

t (s)

Excess Pore Pressure at 7.40 m

RESULTS

Page 24: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

0.00

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Late

ral D

isp

lace

me

nt

(m)

t (s)

Top Lateral Displacement

0.00

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Late

ral D

isp

lace

me

nt

(m)

t (s)

Lateral Displacement at 3.70 m

0.00

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Late

ral D

isp

lace

me

nt

(m)

t (s)

Lateral Displacement at 5.55 m

0.00

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Late

ral D

isp

lace

me

nt

(m)

t (s)

Lateral Displacement at 7.40 m

RESULTS

Page 25: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

RESULTS

Page 26: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

RESULTS

(scale 1:150)

Page 27: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

SSI STUDIES

(future research)

Page 28: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

CYCLIC TP

Page 29: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake
Page 30: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

RESULTS

(scale 1:10)

Page 31: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

REFERENCE

Page 32: Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction Phenomena after Emilia Romagna (20 May 2012) Earthquake

THANK [email protected]

D. Forcellini, S. Gobbi and G. Guerra

Università di San Marino

[email protected]