nuclear reactor disasters chernobyl 1986 three mile island 1979 andrew cornwall
Embed Size (px)
TRANSCRIPT

Nuclear Reactor Disasters
Chernobyl1986
Three Mile Island1979
Andrew Cornwall

Chernobyl
• Worst accident ever in the history of Nuclear power
• Released more than 100 times the radiation produced by the atom bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
• Affected Western Soviet Union, Eastern, Central and Northern Europe, and Eastern and Northern America
• 336,000 people evacuated and resettled elsewhere

Where is the Chernobyl Plant?
• Ukraine
• 18km northwest of Chernobyl town
• 110km north of Kiev

Power Plant
• 4 reactors of type – RBMK-1: now obsolete class of graphite moderated nuclear reactor
• Reactor capacity – 1Gigawatt (total plant capacity: 4 Gigawatt)
• Provided 10% of Ukraine’s electricity at time of accident
• 2 additional reactors under construction at time of accident

What Happened?
Series of events in Reactor 4 resulting in:
• Catastrophic “Steam Explosion”
• Nuclear meltdown
• Graphite fire

Series of Events - April 25th 1986• 11pm: Control rods were lowered to reduce reactor output for planned turbine
test) BUT too quickly - almost complete shut down
• 1am: control rods raised to increase reactor activity for the test (12%)
• 1:23am: Reactor overheats; water coolant turns to steam
• 6 control rods left; minimum safe number = 30
• Emergency shut down button pressed
• Control rods re-inserted BUT fault causes power surge in reactor; Out put:100 times normal
• Fuel pellets explode; roof blown off; air sucked in causing fire

Immediate Aftermath• Area evacuated, but quite slowly - “exclusion zone”
• Tragedy made worse by poor preparation, equipment and assessments
• Radiation estimated at 20,000 Rontgen/hr (lethal dose = 100 R/hr)
• True radiation unknown
• Fire burned until helicopters extinguished it by dropping water, sand, lead and boron
• Radioactive cloud observed

Clean-up
• Liquidators sent in to open sluice gates to vent reactor water
• Worst radioactive debris collected in remains of reactor core
• Covered with bags of sand, lead and boric acid(5000 tonnes in first week after explosion)
• Giant concrete sarcophagus erected to seal off reactor and its contents

Ecological Effects• Radioactive cloud floated in easterly direction
• Radiation travelled as far as Sweden (1100km)
• Initial Soviet Union reports: 60% contamination in Belarus
• River Pripyat and Dnieper river-reservoir systemcontaminated (reduced after initial period)
• Fresh water fish contaminatedto several times the safelimits (reduced afterinitial period)
• Pine forest within 4kmradius turnedginger brownand died: Red Forest
• “exclusion zone” became wildlife haven

Human Effects
• 336,000 people evacuated and resettled
• 237 suffered
from acute
radiation sickness
• 31 deaths within
3 months
• 9,000 cancer deaths expected as direct
result of radiation exposure
• 4,000 thyroid cancer
cases among children by 2002

Causes?
• 1986 IAEA Report: Plant Operators to blame
• 1991 Valeri Legasov:
Reactor design flaws to blame
• 1993 IAEA Report:
revoked original report and placed
blame with flawed reactor design

Flawed Reactor Design
• High void coefficient: weaken convection currents
• Graphite tipped control rods: increase activity for short period
• Vertical water channels in core: temperature gradient in core
• Partial containment measurements to save costs
• Operational for 1 year – stored fission by products
• Reactor vessel warped under intense heat, preventing insertion of control rods

Long Term Aftermath• Construction of reactor 5 and 6 terminated
• 200m of concrete built to isolate contaminated reactor from operational buildings
• Reactors 1,2 and 3 continued to operate due to energy shortage in Ukraine
• 1991: Fire in reactor 2 – damaged beyond repair and taken offline
• 1996: IAEA recommended the termination of operations at plant – reactor 3 decommissioned
• 2000: Reactor 3 and entire plant shut down

Current Situation• Sarcophagus not effective permanent containment method – strong wind could
dislodge roof, and water leaks in through gaping holes
• Rising humidity levels inside sarcophagus cause erosion of concrete and steel
• Chernobyl Shelter Fundstarted in 1997 for Shelter Implementation Plan
• Planned construction of “New Safe Confinement” (NSC)
• Large movable arch:Span: 250mHeight: 100mLength: 150m
• Cost: $1.2 Billion

Three Mile IslandThree Mile Island
• Worst Accident in history of commercial Nuclear power in AmericaWorst Accident in history of commercial Nuclear power in America
• Accident unfolded over 5 daysAccident unfolded over 5 days
• World’s worst civilian disaster until Chernobyl 7 years laterWorld’s worst civilian disaster until Chernobyl 7 years later
• No injuries or deathsNo injuries or deaths

Where is Three Mile Island Plant?Where is Three Mile Island Plant?
• United States of AmericaUnited States of America
• Dauphin County,Dauphin County,
PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
• Three miles downThree miles down
river from near river from near
by town, Harrisburgby town, Harrisburg
(Hence the name)(Hence the name)

Power PlantPower Plant
• 2 Pressurised Water Reactors: TMI-1 and TMI-22 Pressurised Water Reactors: TMI-1 and TMI-2
• TMI-1 : 850 MWe capacityTMI-1 : 850 MWe capacity
• Individual containmentIndividual containment
buildings per reactorbuildings per reactor
• Reactors connected byReactors connected by
cooling towerscooling towers

What Happened?What Happened?
• A series of malfunctions resulting in:A series of malfunctions resulting in:
• Rupturing of quench tank relief diaphragmRupturing of quench tank relief diaphragm
• Small explosion in containmentSmall explosion in containment
buildingbuilding
• Melting of half of the coreMelting of half of the core

Series of malfunctions March 27Series of malfunctions March 27thth 19791979
• Plants main feed water pumps failPlants main feed water pumps fail
• Turbine and reactor shut downTurbine and reactor shut down
• Extra heat causes rise in steam production and increase in pressureExtra heat causes rise in steam production and increase in pressure
• Pilot operated pressuriser relief valve was opened and jammed – cooling Pilot operated pressuriser relief valve was opened and jammed – cooling water escapedwater escaped
• Pressuriser indicator gave false reading and water was cut off from Pressuriser indicator gave false reading and water was cut off from reactorreactor
• Reactor core became uncovered causing reaction between fuel rods and Reactor core became uncovered causing reaction between fuel rods and steam – producing explosionsteam – producing explosion

Immediate AftermathImmediate Aftermath
• 7am: Site area emergency was declared7am: Site area emergency was declared
• 7:24am: Upgraded to “general emergency”7:24am: Upgraded to “general emergency”
• 8pm: primary loop pumps turned back on and reactor core found to 8pm: primary loop pumps turned back on and reactor core found to have meltedhave melted
• Steam and Hydrogen removed using recombinerSteam and Hydrogen removed using recombiner
• Controversial vent used to expel radioactive hydrogen and steam Controversial vent used to expel radioactive hydrogen and steam straight into atmospherestraight into atmosphere
• 13 million curies of radioactive noble gases released13 million curies of radioactive noble gases released

Clean upClean up
• Started in 1979 and officially ended in 1993Started in 1979 and officially ended in 1993
• Cost: $975 millionCost: $975 million
• Removal of 100 tonnes of radioactive fuel between 1985 and 1990Removal of 100 tonnes of radioactive fuel between 1985 and 1990

Ecological and Human EffectsEcological and Human Effects
• Possible link between lung cancer and offsite exposures, but not Possible link between lung cancer and offsite exposures, but not conclusiveconclusive
• No member of public was injured by the accidentNo member of public was injured by the accident
• Average radiation dose to people within 10km radius: 8 millirem; Average radiation dose to people within 10km radius: 8 millirem; equal to single X-rayequal to single X-ray
• Radiation dose no more than 100 millirem; equal to 1/3 background Radiation dose no more than 100 millirem; equal to 1/3 background radiationradiation

DecommissioningDecommissioning
• Reactor gradually dismantled and mothballed by 1993Reactor gradually dismantled and mothballed by 1993
• De-fuelling completed in 1988De-fuelling completed in 1988
• Damaged reactor safely removed and disposed in 1993Damaged reactor safely removed and disposed in 1993
• Unit 1 permitted to resume operations in 1985 following licence Unit 1 permitted to resume operations in 1985 following licence suspensionsuspension
• Unit 2 maintained and monitored since by various companies: Unit 2 maintained and monitored since by various companies: currently Exelon nuclearcurrently Exelon nuclear

Long Term AftermathLong Term Aftermath
• Public approval of nuclear power in the U.S fell from 70% to 50%Public approval of nuclear power in the U.S fell from 70% to 50%
• Only 53 of 123 newly approved plants were ever completed: demise Only 53 of 123 newly approved plants were ever completed: demise in nuclear industryin nuclear industry
• Federal requirements became more stringentFederal requirements became more stringent
• Local opposition became more stringentLocal opposition became more stringent
• Construction time severely lengthenedConstruction time severely lengthened
