ntra mobile qos monthly eport · 2016-11-28 · • benchmarking capabilities in the form of...

NTRA MOBILE QOS MONTHLY REPORT

SEPTEMBER - 2016

This Report is A PROPERTY of NTRA

Any use of this Report for any purpose is permitted only upon NTRA’s written

consent

Before you Read this Report you are advised to take into account the

following elements:

Quality of Mobile Services surveys is a snapshot of the

observed quality and performance offered by Mobile

Operators at the time of the survey.

Mobile Operators are continuously performing modifications

and upgrades so performance of the network at the time of

reading the report may differs from the results stated here.

To be consistent with this level of accuracy, results have been

rounded up or down to the nearest tenth of a unit. It’s

reminded that:

The sum of two rounded results can be different from the rounding of their sum.

Multiplying one rounded result by another is different than rounding the result of their multiplication.

Table of contents

1.0 Introduction…….…………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… 3

2.0 QoS Methodology……….………………………………………………………………………………………………. 4

2.1 QoS Key Performance Indicators....……………………………………………..……………………. 4

2.2 Measuring System......……………………………………………………………..…………..…………. 6

2.3 Benchmarking Drive Test Scenarios...……………………………………………..……..…………. 7

3.0 Missions Statistics….……………………………………………………………..…………………………..……….. 8

3.1 Voice Services Statistics.....…………………….…………………..……….………..…………..……… 9

3.1.1 Short Calls…………………………….………………………………………….…………….. 10

3.1.2 Long Calls…………………………….………………….…….……………..………….…….. 11

3.2 Data Services Statistic…………...…………………………………………….……….………………….. 12

3.2.1 Ping Statistics...……………...……………….…………….……………………………….. 13

3.2.2 HTTP browsing Statistics…….………………………….…………….………………….. 14

3.2.3 Video Streaming Statistic……………………………….…………….…….……………. 15

4.0 Benchmarking Drive Test Results for Mobile Operators

4.1 Voice Services Measurements…..…..….……………………………………………………………… 16

4.1.1 Cairo Region……………….………………….………………….…………………………….. 17

4.1.2 Alex & Northern Coast Region…………………………..……….………….……………. 20

4.1.3 Delta Region………………………….….………………….………………………………….. 23

4.1.4 Red Sea Region……………………………………………….…….…….…….….………….. 26

4.1.5 Upper Egypt Region...…………………………….….………………………..…………….. 29

4.2 Data Services Measurements……...…………..……………………………………..…..…………… 32

4.2.1 Cairo Region………………….……………….………………….…………….…..………….. 33

4.2.2 Alex & Northern Coast Region…………………………..……….………….……………. 35

4.2.3 Delta Region………………………………………………….………………………………….. 37

4.2.4 Red Sea Region………………….……….………….………………………………..……….. 39

4.2.5 Upper Egypt Region...………………………….…………………..………………….…….. 41

1.0 Introduction

The National Telecom Regulatory Authority of Egypt (NTRA) has the power and authority to monitor and measure the Quality of Service (QoS) provided by the three mobile operators in Egypt (Orange, Vodafone and Etisalat). NTRA is responsible for laying down the standards of QoS to be provided by mobile operators, ensuring the QoS and conducting periodical drive test surveys to protect interest of the consumers of wireless networks in Egypt.

Mobile operators deliver weekly reports to NTRA including performance, traffic and roll-out indicators. The operators weekly reports present the results of the Quality of Service indicators based on statistical measurements, averaged over a week.

Moreover, NTRA conducts field survey campaigns covering all governorates across the country on a monthly basis to measure QoS for mobile operators in terms of the major KPI's according to the national standards (ETSI, ITU-T) which introduced in the issued license for mobile operators .

In order to measure those major KPI's, NTRA uses ASCOM’s TEMS Automatic solution which include drive test RTU’s latest automated measuring tools to perform outdoor measurements surveys to benchmark the three mobile operators up to streets level.

This Monthly report presents all measurements and statistics monitored by NTRA QoS monitoring team during the month .The structure of this report can be introduced as follows:

Section 2.0 clarifies the QoS methodology used by NTRA to monitor QoS for mobile operators in Egypt.

Section 3.0 presents a summary of all drive test missions statistics performed by NTRA during the month. This is indicated by number of samples for both voice and data services during all drive test missions for Cairo, Alex, Delta, Red Sea and Upper Egypt Regions along with all measured cities during those drive test surveys.

Section 4.0 introduces the NTRA Monthly Benchmarking QoS Report for Mobile Operators in Egypt to measure the network performance benchmarking for the three mobile operators for both voice services and data services.

2.0 QoS Methodology

NTRA has six teams to measure the QoS of mobile operators all over Egypt. Methodology of NTRA includes major KPI’s to be measured, the technical tools used in the drive test and finally the different tests to be performed.

2.1 QoS Key Performance Indicators

Major QoS indicators were measured during drive test although the available NTRA

QoS monitoring tools can measure other KPI's .These major KPI's give clear image on

the performance of the three mobile operators for Voice and Data Services.

2.1.1 Voice Service KPI's :

2.1.1.1 Call Block Rate :

Definition:

The percentage of unsuccessful call setup attempts to the total number of call

attempts in a specified time period.

Threshold:

Threshold value = 2 %

2.1.1.2 Dropped call Rate :

Definition:

The percentage of calls being dropped or interrupted without the subscriber’s permission after successful call establishment to the total number of successfully established attempts.

Threshold:


2.1.1.3 Speech Voice Quality :

Definition:

Is the rate of bad speech voice calls (less than 2.8) scored on MOS score which is a measure for end-to-end (mouth to ear) speech quality of a voice service call.

Threshold:


2.1.1.4 MOS (Mean Opinion Score) – Max , Min , Mean Values :

Definition:

Is a measure for end-to-end (mouth to ear) perceived speech quality of a voice service call. It is expressed on a MOS (Mean Opinion Score) scale which describes quality categories: best, high, medium, low and poor represented by numbers from 5 to 1 respectively.

2.1.2 Data Service KPI's:

2.1.2.1 Average http download throughput:

Definition:

The average rate of successful message delivery over a communication channel.

This data may be delivered over a physical or logical link, or pass through a

certain network node. The throughput is usually measured in bits per second

(bit/s or bps), and sometimes in data packets per second or data packets per

time slot

2.1.2.2 Latency (Ping):

Definition:

It is the most sufficient element that contributes to network speed. The term

latency refers to any of several kinds of delays typically incurred in processing

of network data. A so-called low latency network connection is one that

generally experiences small delay times, while a high latency connection

generally suffers from long delays.

2.1.2.3 Video Freezing Time Proportion (Streaming Buffering Time):

Definition:

The proportion of the accumulated video freezing duration in relation to

the expected video duration for successful playouts.

2.1.2.4 Transfer Time (Browsing):

Definition:

It is the time needed to transfer a certain web page from the worldwide

internet from a web server into a browser in order to view a webpage.

2.2 Measuring System

NTRA uses ASCOM’s TEMS Automatic Solution as a multi-purpose solution for data collection and end-to-end testing, developed for 24/7 monitoring, troubleshooting, and benchmarking. It produces multi-level output, spanning the whole range from raw route data to KPIs.

TEMS Automatic provides NTRA with:

Insight into the end-user’s perception of the network, thanks to measurements taken in the air interface rather than at network. A faithful measure of the end-to-end quality is obtained both for voice (using POLQA) and for data transfer.

• Automated measurements in the truest sense. Data uploading and system configuration are carried out automatically. This enables rapid feedback on the state of the network – almost in real-time – to the entire organization, all the way from RF engineers in the field to management.

• Benchmarking capabilities in the form of multi-device test units and mechanisms for careful synchronization of test calls and data sessions.

• Remotely configurable data collecting probes. Test units can have their measurement instructions and their software uploaded from a central administration console.

TEMS Automatic uses RTUs (Remote Test Units). These are autonomous data-collecting devices installed in vehicles traveling the network area

RTUs interact with quality test nodes for voice telephony and data services. A built-in GPS unit records driving routes

System administration is done from the Operator Console, which can be operated through a Web interface. A key part of this administration is the assignment of work orders to RTUs, telling them where, when, and how to perform their testing.

RTUs make regular contact with the fixed side of the system in order to upload logfiles and receive new instructions. The logfiles are subsequently stored in a TEMS Discovery relational database for post-processing

TEMS Automatic system overview.

2.3 Benchmarking Drive Test Scenarios:

2.3.1 Voice Scenarios:

NTRA applies the both configurations of tests MTM mobile-to-mobile between RTUs the A-Part is RTU moving through the measured region and the B-Part is RTU placed in NTRA premise to terminate the call, and MTF mobile-to-fixed with RTU devices engaging a Call Generator connected to a PSTN network.

For MTM a voice call attempt followed by 1 minute Conversation and it represents 78% of the whole test.

For MTF a voice call attempt followed by 6 minutes Conversation and it represents 22% of the whole test.

2.3.2 Data Scenarios:

Data test is measured using RTU Data Card. The A-Part is RTU moving through the measured region while the B-Part is the Internet Gateway

Ping test: to test the network latency

HTTP browsing: by testing the time to browse the URL www.facebook.com

HTTP download: to test the throughput by downloading a file of 5 MB

Streaming: To stream a one minute video from www.youtube.com to measure it’s buffering time.

2.3.3 Special dedicated Drive Test Scenarios:

NTRA will perform special dedicated missions to measure the QoS in certain locations that are strategically important .Those measures may include but not limited to:

1- Indoor measurements for ( Conference centers , Airports , Subways , Hotels , Malls) 2- Outdoors measurements for places like :

a. Rings roads and Axes b. High ways connecting main cities.

http://www.facebook.com/

http://www.youtube.com/

3.0 Missions Statistics

3.1 Voice Measurements Statistics

Regions Subregions Cities Total Blocked Droped Total Blocked Droped Total Blocked Droped

Nasr City 353 6 1 349 5 1 389 0 1

Heliopolis 287 2 1 265 0 0 288 1 3

Obour City 348 5 0 352 1 0 344 5 2

Qobba Gardens 309 3 0 316 3 0 308 3 0

Abbassia 300 1 0 277 4 0 299 0 1

Sherouk - Rehab City 719 7 0 710 6 2 693 6 2

Tagamoa 245 3 2 254 3 0 248 1 2

2841 29 5 2823 28 3 2850 17 12

Zayed 293 3 0 287 1 1 306 1 2

Haram 235 2 0 236 0 1 234 4 1

Mohandesin 259 2 0 277 0 1 319 1 1

1566 10 0 1600 7 3 1627 13 5

Zamalek 268 3 2 263 3 0 273 3 1

Down Town 289 4 1 286 0 0 286 1 0

557 7 3 549 3 0 559 4 1

Shobra 294 2 1 299 0 0 293 0 1

Embaba 244 2 1 244 1 0 245 5 0

Ain Shams 424 2 0 317 4 0 420 1 0

962 6 2 860 5 0 958 6 1

Maadi 272 4 0 235 1 0 268 1 1

Helwan 273 2 1 280 1 0 276 5 0

Mokattam 354 4 4 368 2 5 345 3 3

899 10 5 883 4 5 889 9 4

East Alex 940 14 1 959 7 1 929 17 2

West Alex 335 2 2 346 1 4 337 3 1

Matrouh Matrouh 380 2 1 382 3 1 365 4 1

Northern Coast Northern Coast 431 1 0 452 1 0 455 7 0

Zagazig 277 1 0 284 3 1 276 3 0

10th of Ramadan 270 3 0 254 5 0 253 1 1

Tanta 312 2 3 295 1 1 315 3 1

Mahalla 330 5 0 338 2 0 327 2 1

Monoffia Shebin 264 0 1 272 2 2 260 1 2

Dekahlia Mansoura 247 2 0 273 2 3 263 3 0

Kafr Elshikh Kafr Elshikh 255 1 0 249 0 0 246 1 0

Qaliobbia Banha 235 3 1 254 1 0 247 1 0

Damnhour 253 1 1 253 2 0 243 1 0

Kafr Eldawar 237 2 2 235 1 0 236 3 0

Ismailia Ismailia 474 7 1 554 2 0 561 0 0

Port said Port said 400 4 1 422 6 0 439 4 0

Suez Suez 431 5 0 446 1 0 429 2 1

Red Sea Hurgada 271 2 1 269 0 0 265 1 0

Sharm 274 6 0 234 0 1 264 2 0

Dahab 237 3 0 234 0 0 236 1 0

Nouibaa 252 4 0 234 1 0 237 0 0

Fayoum Fayoum 268 0 0 263 1 1 268 2 0

Bany Swif Bany Swif 237 5 0 246 1 0 246 0 0

Menya Menya 272 3 1 276 0 0 274 4 0

Asyout Asyout 235 1 0 242 0 0 237 2 0

Sohag Sohag 485 1 0 497 1 0 462 2 0

Qena Qena 235 0 0 234 2 0 236 2 1

Louxor Luxor 234 5 0 236 0 0 235 1 0

Aswan Aswan 287 1 0 235 0 0 292 4 2

Cairo Center

Cairo Center Total

North Cairo

North Cairo Total

South Cairo

Measured CitiesOrange Vodafone Etisalat

3.1.1 Number of Voice Samples ( Short Calls ) in September- 2016

Upper Egypt

Al Beheirra

Red Sea

South Sinai

South Cairo Total

Alex &

Northern Coast

Alexandria

Delta

Sharkia

Gharbia

Cairo

East Cairo

East Cairo Total

West Cairo

West Cairo Total


Nasr City 79 1 2 90 3 4 104 1 1

Heliopolis 61 0 1 62 0 1 75 2 3

Obour City 79 1 4 84 1 1 84 3 3

Qobba Gardens 74 1 5 74 0 2 81 0 3

Abbassia 67 0 3 58 0 0 80 1 1


Tagamoa 55 0 3 67 1 1 59 0 0

646 5 27 675 7 11 735 10 22

Zayed 68 0 2 67 0 3 76 0 3

Haram 65 0 2 64 0 2 66 0 1

Mohandesin 52 1 1 68 0 1 66 1 0

358 1 17 382 1 6 395 3 5

Zamalek 59 1 4 65 0 2 65 0 1

Down Town 65 0 4 68 0 2 75 0 4

124 1 8 133 0 4 140 0 5

Shobra 61 1 1 72 0 3 76 0 1

Embaba 56 0 4 66 0 1 68 0 2

Ain Shams 94 0 1 66 0 1 106 1 0

211 1 6 204 0 5 250 1 3

Maadi 63 0 1 65 1 0 67 1 2

Helwan 64 0 4 68 0 1 71 1 2

Mokattam 77 1 10 86 1 4 96 2 9

204 1 15 219 2 5 234 4 13

East Alex 221 5 11 233 1 4 220 1 2

West Alex 80 1 4 83 0 0 80 1 1

Matrouh Matrouh 90 0 4 91 1 0 85 1 0


Zagazig 63 0 1 68 1 0 66 0 0

10th of Ramadan 48 1 4 58 0 0 60 0 0

Tanta 59 0 1 70 0 0 73 1 1

Mahalla 77 2 1 82 1 3 87 1 1

Monoffia Shebin 61 2 1 67 1 0 62 1 0



Qaliobbia Banha 65 1 2 61 0 0 64 0 0

Damnhour 58 1 3 59 0 0 58 0 0

Kafr Eldawar 63 0 0 65 0 0 64 1 2



Suez Suez 98 2 3 107 3 0 108 1 0

Red Sea Hurgada 62 1 4 64 0 0 65 0 2

Sharm 61 0 1 66 2 0 60 1 1

Dahab 63 0 2 66 0 0 64 0 0

Nouibaa 56 1 1 66 0 0 63 0 0

Fayoum Fayoum 60 0 3 66 0 2 61 0 0


Menya Menya 61 0 3 69 0 0 64 0 1

Asyout Asyout 65 2 4 58 0 1 63 0 1

Sohag Sohag 108 0 1 118 1 0 107 2 0

Qena Qena 65 0 0 66 0 0 64 0 0

Louxor Luxor 66 0 0 64 0 0 65 0 0

Aswan Aswan 65 1 2 65 0 0 66 1 0

East Cairo

East Cairo Total

West Cairo

West Cairo Total

Upper Egypt

Red Sea

South Sinai

3.1.2 Number of Voice Samples ( Long Calls ) in September- 2016

Al Beheirra

Cairo Center

Cairo Center Total

North Cairo

North Cairo Total

South Cairo

South Cairo Total

Measured CitiesOrange Vodafone

Alex &

Northern Coast

Alexandria

Delta

Sharkia

Gharbia

Etisalat

Cairo

3.2 Data Measurements Statistics


Nasr City 147 0 0 115 0 0 164 0 0

Heliopolis 120 0 0 98 0 0 107 0 0

Obour City 150 0 0 152 0 0 139 0 0

Qobba Gardens 135 0 0 127 0 0 122 0 0

Abbassia 125 0 0 120 0 0 105 0 0


Tagamoa 110 0 0 111 0 0 106 1 0

1206 0 0 1104 0 0 1158 2 0

Zayed 128 0 0 122 0 0 127 1 0

Haram 86 0 0 91 0 0 97 0 0

Mohandesin 115 0 0 104 0 0 124 0 0

656 0 0 622 0 0 655 1 0

Zamalek 117 0 0 110 0 0 112 2 0

Down Town 122 0 0 119 0 0 118 0 0

239 0 0 229 0 0 230 2 0

Shobra 119 0 0 126 0 0 113 0 0

Embaba 113 0 0 113 0 0 112 0 0

Ain Shams 182 0 0 117 0 0 172 0 0

414 0 0 356 0 0 397 0 0

Maadi 115 0 0 110 0 0 99 0 0

Helwan 113 0 0 100 0 0 104 2 0

Mokattam 140 0 0 143 0 0 133 0 0

368 0 0 353 0 0 336 2 0

East Alex 359 0 0 347 0 0 381 2 0

West Alex 140 0 0 144 0 0 148 0 0

Matrouh Matrouh 127 1 0 137 0 0 150 1 0


Zagazig 118 0 0 125 0 0 121 1 0

10th of Ramadan 92 0 0 73 0 0 111 2 0

Tanta 132 0 0 125 0 0 147 1 0

Mahalla 147 1 0 154 0 0 154 2 0

Monoffia Shebin 118 0 0 108 0 0 119 1 0



Qaliobbia Banha 95 0 0 98 0 0 103 1 0

Damnhour 103 0 0 107 0 0 106 0 0

Kafr Eldawar 82 0 0 100 0 0 98 0 0



Suez Suez 182 1 0 193 0 0 190 1 0

Red Sea Hurgada 112 0 0 117 0 0 115 1 0

Sharm 118 0 0 115 0 0 116 0 0

Dahab 68 0 0 70 0 0 94 0 0

Nouibaa 92 0 0 90 0 0 100 0 0

Fayoum Fayoum 105 0 0 107 0 0 220 1 0


Menya Menya 102 0 0 88 0 0 221 2 0

Asyout Asyout 98 0 0 96 0 0 192 2 0

Sohag Sohag 173 0 0 209 0 0 160 0 0

Qena Qena 82 0 0 89 0 0 87 0 0

Louxor Luxor 86 0 0 52 0 0 91 2 0

Aswan Aswan 107 0 0 90 0 0 121 2 0

Upper Egypt

Al Beheirra

Red Sea

South Sinai

South Cairo Total

Alex &

Northern Coast

Alexandria

Delta

Sharkia

Gharbia

Cairo

East Cairo

East Cairo Total

West Cairo

West Cairo Total

Cairo Center

Cairo Center Total

North Cairo

North Cairo Total

South Cairo

Measured CitiesOrange Vodafone Etisalat

September- 20163.2.1 Number of Data Samples ( Ping Test ) in


Nasr City 301 0 0 243 0 0 327 0 0

Heliopolis 242 0 0 188 0 0 215 0 0

Obour City 303 0 0 302 0 0 280 0 0

Qobba Gardens 270 0 0 256 0 0 246 0 0

Abbassia 255 0 0 209 0 0 210 0 0


Tagamoa 227 0 0 227 0 0 216 0 0

2428 0 0 2197 0 0 2325 0 0

Zayed 247 0 0 240 0 0 258 0 0

Haram 175 0 0 183 0 0 191 0 0

Mohandesin 226 0 0 208 0 0 248 0 0

1301 0 0 1253 0 0 1313 0 0

Zamalek 241 0 0 225 0 0 226 0 1

Down Town 253 0 0 240 0 0 238 0 0

494 0 0 465 0 0 464 0 1

Shobra 252 0 0 255 0 2 228 0 0

Embaba 226 0 1 226 0 0 227 0 0

Ain Shams 367 0 0 234 0 0 346 0 1

845 0 0 715 0 0 801 0 0

Maadi 234 0 1 205 0 0 201 0 0

Helwan 233 0 0 203 0 1 216 0 0

Mokattam 290 0 0 296 0 0 274 0 1

757 0 1 704 0 1 691 0 1

East Alex 719 0 0 698 0 0 766 0 0

West Alex 278 0 0 288 0 0 292 0 0

Matrouh Matrouh 252 0 0 288 0 0 304 0 0


Zagazig 236 0 0 253 0 0 243 0 0

10th of Ramadan 186 0 0 144 0 0 222 0 0

Tanta 268 0 0 270 0 0 294 0 0

Mahalla 295 0 0 312 0 0 310 0 0

Monoffia Shebin 229 0 0 219 0 0 238 0 0



Qaliobbia Banha 188 0 0 193 0 0 207 0 0

Damnhour 205 0 0 170 0 0 208 0 0

Kafr Eldawar 171 0 0 204 0 0 200 0 0



Suez Suez 370 0 0 394 0 1 380 0 0

Red Sea Hurgada 223 0 1 233 0 0 230 0 0

Sharm 235 0 0 220 0 0 234 0 1

Dahab 165 0 0 150 0 1 190 0 0

Nouibaa 183 0 1 186 0 0 200 0 0

Fayoum Fayoum 210 0 1 214 0 0 230 0 0


Menya Menya 202 0 0 173 0 0 210 0 1

Asyout Asyout 202 0 0 191 0 0 201 0 0

Sohag Sohag 345 0 0 320 0 0 340 0 0

Qena Qena 166 0 0 180 0 0 175 0 1

Louxor Luxor 169 0 0 180 0 0 183 0 0

Aswan Aswan 215 0 0 200 0 1 242 0 0

Upper Egypt

Red Sea

South Sinai

Alex &

Northern Coast

Alexandria

Delta

Sharkia

Gharbia

Etisalat

Cairo

East Cairo

East Cairo Total

West Cairo

West Cairo Total

September- 20163.2.2 Number of Data Samples (HTTP Browsing Test) in

Al Beheirra

Cairo Center

Cairo Center Total

North Cairo

North Cairo Total

South Cairo

South Cairo Total



Nasr City 144 0 0 113 0 1 156 0 0

Heliopolis 120 0 0 93 0 0 108 0 0

Obour City 149 0 0 151 0 0 140 0 0

Qobba Gardens 131 0 0 127 0 0 120 0 0

Abbassia 125 0 0 104 0 0 108 0 0


Tagamoa 108 0 0 114 0 0 102 0 0

1184 0 0 1075 0 1 1070 0 1

Zayed 124 0 0 116 0 0 134 0 0

Haram 86 0 0 92 0 1 94 0 0

Mohandesin 114 0 0 106 0 0 118 0 0

646 0 0 614 0 1 649 0 0

Zamalek 115 0 0 110 0 0 112 0 0

Down Town 125 0 0 119 0 0 118 0 0

240 0 0 229 0 0 230 0 0

Shobra 119 0 0 125 0 0 114 0 0

Embaba 111 0 0 112 0 1 112 0 0

Ain Shams 183 0 0 116 0 0 172 0 0

413 0 0 353 0 1 398 0 0

Maadi 115 0 0 100 0 0 80 0 0

Helwan 114 0 0 101 0 0 106 0 0

Mokattam 140 0 0 137 0 0 119 0 0

369 0 0 338 0 0 305 0 0

East Alex 355 0 0 343 0 1 377 0 0

West Alex 138 0 0 141 0 0 145 0 0

Matrouh Matrouh 125 0 0 138 0 0 148 0 0


Zagazig 119 0 0 125 0 0 122 0 0

10th of Ramadan 91 0 0 72 0 0 111 0 0

Tanta 131 0 0 124 0 0 147 0 0

Mahalla 145 0 0 155 0 0 154 0 0

Monoffia Shebin 113 0 0 108 0 0 119 0 0



Qaliobbia Banha 93 0 0 98 0 0 103 0 0

Damnhour 104 0 0 90 0 0 104 0 0

Kafr Eldawar 84 0 1 101 0 0 99 0 0



Suez Suez 181 0 0 192 0 0 190 0 0

Red Sea Hurgada 111 0 0 116 0 0 114 0 0

Sharm 117 0 0 104 0 0 116 0 0

Dahab 80 0 0 70 0 0 92 0 0

Nouibaa 91 0 0 96 0 0 100 0 0

Fayoum Fayoum 106 0 0 106 0 0 110 0 0


Menya Menya 101 0 0 100 0 0 103 0 0

Asyout Asyout 97 0 0 95 0 0 102 0 0

Sohag Sohag 173 0 0 155 0 0 170 0 0

Qena Qena 84 0 0 88 0 0 87 0 0

Louxor Luxor 84 0 0 75 0 0 92 0 0

Aswan Aswan 107 0 0 99 0 0 121 0 0

Upper Egypt

Red Sea

South Sinai

Alex &

Northern Coast

Alexandria

Delta

Sharkia

Gharbia

Etisalat

Cairo

East Cairo

East Cairo Total

West Cairo

West Cairo Total

September- 20163.2.3 Number of Data Samples (Video Streaming Test) in

Al Beheirra

Cairo Center

Cairo Center Total

North Cairo

North Cairo Total

South Cairo

South Cairo Total


4.1 Voice Services Measurements

4.1.1 Cairo Region

This graph shows network performance in terms of BAD VOICE QUALITY RATE for the mobile operators in Cairo Region divided to five main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities

represented by the bar charts.(Threshold According to the license = 10% represented by the dashed line)

This graph shows network performance in terms of CALL DROP RATE for the mobile operators in Cairo Region divided to five main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities represented by the

bar charts.(Threshold According to the license = 2% represented by the dashed line)

This graph shows network performance in terms of CALL BLOCK RATE for the mobile operators in Cairo Region divided to five main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities represented by

the bar charts.(Threshold According to the license = 2% represented by the dashed line)

Call Block Rate (%), September- 2016

Call Drop Rate (%) , September- 2016

Bad Voice Quality Rate (%) , September- 2016

1.6%

0.6%

0.6%

1.4%

1.0%

0.3%

1.0%

1.0%

1.0%

0.8%

0.5%

0.7%

0.2%

1.0%

0.6%

1.2%

1.1%

1.2%

0.8%

0.7%

0.4%

0.6%

1.2%

0.6%

1.2%

1.0%

1.8

%

0.0%

1.9%

0.5%

0.8

%

1.2%

0.8%

1.2%

1.0%

0.3%

0.0%

0.0%

1.1%

0.0%

0.4%

0.9%

0.0%

0.4%

0.0%

0.3%

1.0%

0.5%

0.7%

0.3

%

0.7%

0.5%

0.2%

0.8%

0.8%

1.9%

0.8%

0.3%

0.8%

0.3%

0.8%

0.3%

0.8

%

1.3%

1.0%

0.5%

0.8%

0.9%

0.3%

0.6%

0.0%

1.6%

0.4

% 0.

6%

0.6%

1.7%

1.1%

1.2

%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

Nas

r C

ity

He

liop

oli

s

El S

ala

m

Ob

ou

r C

ity

Qo

bb

a G

ard

en

s

Ab

ba

ssia

Sher

ou

k -

Reh

ab C

ity

Taga

mo

a

Zaye

d

Oct

ob

er

Har

am

Fais

al

Mo

han

de

sin

Zam

ale

k

Do

wn

To

wn

Sho

bra

Emb

ab

a

Ain

Sh

am

s

Ma

adi

He

lwan

Mo

katt

am

East Cairo EastCairoTotal

West Cairo WestCairoTotal

Cairo Center CairoCenterTotal

North Cairo NorthCairoTotal

South Cairo SouthCairoTotal

Orange Vodafone Etisalat Threshold

2.1%

2.3%

1.2%

1.9%

0.3%

1.1%

0.3%

0.3%

1.1%

0.8%

2.0%

0.7%

0.5

%

0.3%

0.8%

2.2%

0.9%

1.5

%

1.7%

0.3%

1.0%

1.0

%

0.9%

0.9%

3.4%

1.9%

1.6

%

0.9%

0.0%

1.6%

0.3%

0.9%

0.5

%

0.0%

0.7

%

1.1%

1.4%

0.7%

1.0

% 1.

7%

1.2%

0.6%

0.6%

0.6%

0.5%

0.0%

0.5%

0.4%

0.3

%

1.4%

1.6%

1.2%

1.4%

1.7%

3.1%

2.2%

1.8%

1.3%

1.3%

0.7%

1.6%

0.8%

0.5%

1.4%

2.3%

3.1%

1.7%

0.6

%

0.0%

0.3%

1.6%

0.7%

0.4

%

0.8

%

1.2%

3.2%

2.4%

2.3%

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

Nas

r C

ity

He

liop

oli

s

El S

ala

m

Ob

ou

r C

ity

Qo

bb

a G

ard

en

s

Ab

ba

ssia

Sher

ou

k -

Reh

ab C

ity

Taga

mo

a

Zaye

d

Oct

ob

er

Har

am

Fais

al

Mo

han

de

sin

Zam

ale

k

Do

wn

To

wn

Sho

bra

Emb

ab

a

Ain

Sh

am

s

Ma

adi

He

lwan

Mo

katt

am







0.7%

0.6%

1.4%

0.9%

1.3%

0.8%

0.6%

1.7%

0.9%

0.6%

1.6%

0.7%

1.0%

0.3%

0.9%

1.8%

1.4%

1.6%

0.6%

1.7%

0.2%

0.7%

0.3%

1.5%

3.2%

1.8%

1.1%

0.3%

0.3%

0.2%

0.5%

0.0%

0.3%

0.3%

0.4%

1.1%

0.0%

1.0%

0.0%

0.6%

0.5%

0.6%

0.6%

0.6%

0.8%

0.3%

0.3%

0.5%

0.0%

0.3%

2.0%

0.9%

0.4%

1.7%

1.1%

1.2%

0.8%

0.5%

1.2%

0.7%

0.9%

1.3%

0.0%

0.7%

0.3%

0.3%

0.5%

0.6%

1.1%

0.9%

0.5%

0.6%

0.0%

0.3%

0.9%

0.6%

2.7%

1.5%

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

Nas

r C

ity

He

liop

oli

s

El S

ala

m

Ob

ou

r C

ity

Qo

bb

a G

ard

en

s

Ab

ba

ssia

Sher

ou

k -

Reh

ab C

ity

Taga

mo

a

Zaye

d

Oct

ob

er

Har

am

Fais

al

Mo

han

de

sin

Zam

ale

k

Do

wn

To

wn

Sho

bra

Emb

ab

a

Ain

Sh

am

s

Ma

adi

He

lwan

Mo

katt

am







Voice Quality MOS Scores , September- 2016

The graphs show network performance in terms of VOICE QUALITY MOS Scores values for the mobile operators in Cairo Region divided to five main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities.

The Min and Max MOS values are represented by the bar charts and the Mean MOS value is represented by the line chart.1.

9

1.8 2.

2

1.3

2.8

2.5

2.3

2.7

1.3 1.

9

1.9

1.1 1.

4

2.4

1.1

1.9 2.

6

1.9

1.2 1.

5

1.3

1.2

2.1

1.1

1.1

1.1

4.4

4.4 4.

4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4 4.

4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4 4.

4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.0 4.0 4.1 4.0 4.1 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.0 4.1

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

Nas

r C

ity

He

liop

oli

s

El S

ala

m

Ob

ou

r C

ity

Qo

bb

a G

ard

en

s

Ab

ba

ssia

Sher

ou

k -

Reh

ab C

ity

Taga

mo

a

Zaye

d

Oct

ob

er

Har

am

Fais

al

Mo

han

de

sin

Zam

ale

k

Do

wn

To

wn

Sho

bra

Emb

ab

a

Ain

Sh

am

s

Ma

adi

He

lwan

Mo

katt

am






Orange Voice(Min) Orange Voice(Max) Orange Voice(Mean)

2.0 2.

5 3.2

1.1

2.0 2.1

1.1

3.3

1.1

1.1

1.9 2.

3

2.2

1.3

1.1

1.0

2.4

1.0

2.5

3.2

1.0

1.0

2.6

1.8

1.5

1.5

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4 4.

4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.5

4.5

4.1 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.0 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.2 4.2

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

Nas

r C

ity

He

liop

oli

s

El S

ala

m

Ob

ou

r C

ity

Qo

bb

a G

ard

en

s

Ab

ba

ssia

Sher

ou

k -

Reh

ab C

ity

Taga

mo

a

Zaye

d

Oct

ob

er

Har

am

Fais

al

Mo

han

de

sin

Zam

ale

k

Do

wn

To

wn

Sho

bra

Emb

ab

a

Ain

Sh

am

s

Ma

adi

He

lwan

Mo

katt

am






Vodafone Voice(Min) Vodafone Voice(Max) Vodafone Voice(Mean)

1.2

1.2

1.1 1

.4

1.7

1.4 1.

7 1.9

1.1

2.3

2.3

2.3

1.2

1.1

1.1

2.5 2.

9

2.5

1.1

2.7

2.5

1.1 1.

7

1.5

1.5

1.5

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4 4.

5

4.4

4.4 4.

4

4.5

4.4

4.4

4.5

4.5

4.5

4.5

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.5

4.5

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.1 4.1 4.1 3.9

4.1 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.0 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 3.9 4.0 4.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

Nas

r C

ity

He

liop

oli

s

El S

ala

m

Ob

ou

r C

ity

Qo

bb

a G

ard

en

s

Ab

ba

ssia

Sher

ou

k -

Reh

ab C

ity

Taga

mo

a

Zaye

d

Oct

ob

er

Har

am

Fais

al

Mo

han

de

sin

Zam

ale

k

Do

wn

To

wn

Sho

bra

Emb

ab

a

Ain

Sh

am

s

Ma

adi

He

lwan

Mo

katt

am






Etisalat Voice(Min) Etisalat Voice(Max) Etisalat Voice(Mean)

4.1.2 Alex & Northern Coast Region

This graph shows network performance in terms of BAD VOICE QUALITY RATE for the mobile operators in Alex & Northern Coast Region represented by the bar charts.(Threshold According to the license =

10% represented by the dashed line)

This graph shows network performance in terms of CALL BLOCK RATE for the mobile operators in Alex & Northern Coast Region represented by the bar charts.(Threshold According to the license = 2%

represented by the dashed line)

This graph shows network performance in terms of CALL DROP RATE for the mobile operators in Alex & Northern Coast Region represented by the bar charts.(Threshold According to the license = 2%

represented by the dashed line)

Bad Voice Quality Rate (%), September- 2016

Call Block Rate (%) , September- 2016


1.6%

0.7%

0.4%

0.2%

0.7%

0.2%

0.8%

0.2%

1.6%

1.0%

1.1%

1.2%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

East

Ale

x

Wes

t A

lex

Alexandria Matrouh Northern Coast


2.0%

1.0%

2.2%

0.4%

2.0%

1.4%

3.4%

0.7%

1.6

%

1.2

%

0.5%

0.4%

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

East

Ale

x

Wes

t A

lex



1.0%

1.4%

1.1%

0.6%

0.4%

0.9%

0.2%

0.2%

0.3%

0.5%

0.2%

0.0%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

East

Ale

x

Wes

t A

lex



The graphs show network performance in terms of VOICE QUALITY MOS Scores values for the mobile operators in Alex & Northern Coast Region. The Min and Max MOS values are represented by the bar

charts and the Mean MOS value is represented by the line chart.


1.7 2.

0 2.4

2.0

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

3.9 4.1 4.0

4.2

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0Ea

st A

lex

Wes

t A

lex



2.1

1.2 1.

6

1.4

4.5

4.4

4.4

4.4

3.9 4.1

3.7

4.2

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

East

Ale

x

Wes

t A

lex



2.1

2.0 2.

5

2.6

4.4

4.4

4.4 4.

5

4.0 4.1 4.1 4.2

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

East

Ale

x

Wes

t A

lex



4.1.3 Delta Region

September- 2016


This graph shows network performance in terms of CALL DROP RATE for the mobile operators in Delta Region divided to eight main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities represented by


This graph shows network performance in terms of BAD VOICE QUALITY RATE for the mobile operators in Delta Region divided to eight main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities


This graph shows network performance in terms of CALL BLOCK RATE for the mobile operators in Delta Region divided to eight main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities represented by



Call Drop Rate (%) ,

0.3%

1.3%

0.5%

1.7%

0.6%

1.0%

0.3%

1.3%

1.8%

0.6%

0.7%

1.1%

1.6%

0.3%

0.7%

0.9

%

0.6%

0.0%

0.3%

1.2%

0.6%

0.3%

0.9%

0.3%

1.0%

0.7%

0.6%

1.5%

0.3%

0.3%

0.6%

0.3%

1.3%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

Zaga

zig

10

th o

f R

am

ada

n

Tan

ta

Ma

hal

la

Sheb

in

Ma

nso

ura

Kaf

r El

shik

h

Ban

ha

Dam

iett

a

Dam

nh

ou

r

Kaf

r El

da

war

Sharkia Gharbia Monoffia Dekahlia Kafr Elshikh Qaliobbia Al Beheirra


0.6

%

0.3

%

0.8

% 1.

5%

0.0%

0.3

%

0.0%

1.4%

1.3%

1.3%

1.4%

0.6%

0.7%

4.4%

1.4%

2.7%

7.6%

4.5%

1.9%

6.5%

1.3

%

0.0%

0.9%

0.0%

1.0%

1.0%

0.6%

0.9%

0.0%

1.6%

0.6%

0.0%

0.3%

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

Zaga

zig

10

th o

f R

am

ada

n

Tan

ta

Ma

hal

la

Sheb

in

Ma

nso

ura

Kaf

r El

shik

h

Ban

ha

Dam

iett

a

Dam

nh

ou

r

Kaf

r El

da

war



0.3%

1.3%

1.1%

0.2%

0.6%

0.3%

1.0%

1.0

%

0.9%

1.3%

0.7%

0.3%

0.0%

0.3%

0.7%

0.6%

2.1%

0.3%

0.0%

0.3%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.3%

0.5%

0.5%

0.6%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.7%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

Zaga

zig

10

th o

f R

am

ada

n

Tan

ta

Ma

hal

la

Sheb

in

Ma

nso

ura

Kaf

r El

shik

h

Ban

ha

Dam

iett

a

Dam

nh

ou

r

Kaf

r El

da

war




The graphs show network performance in terms of VOICE QUALITY MOS Scores values for the mobile operators in Delta Region divided to eight main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main

Cities. The Min and Max MOS values are represented by the bar charts and the Mean MOS value is represented by the line chart.1.

9

2.6

2.4

2.0

3.2

2.6 2.

9

1.6 2.

3

1.9

1.9

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4 4.

4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4 4.1 4.1 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

Zaga

zig

10

th o

f R

am

ada

n

Tan

ta

Ma

hal

la

Sheb

in

Ma

nso

ura

Kaf

r El

shik

h

Ban

ha

Dam

iett

a

Dam

nh

ou

r

Kaf

r El

da

war



1.7

2.8

1.3

2.1

1.8 2.1

1.6

2.3

1.7

1.3

3.3

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4 4.

4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.2 4.2 3.9

4.1 3.9 3.9 3.9 4.1

3.8 4.1 4.2

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

Zaga

zig

10

th o

f R

am

ada

n

Tan

ta

Ma

hal

la

Sheb

in

Ma

nso

ura

Kaf

r El

shik

h

Ban

ha

Dam

iett

a

Dam

nh

ou

r

Kaf

r El

da

war



2.3

3.0

1.0

1.1

2.5

2.3

3.2

1.7

2.6

3.2

2.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.0 4.1 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.2 4.1

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

Zaga

zig

10

th o

f R

am

ada

n

Tan

ta

Ma

hal

la

Sheb

in

Ma

nso

ura

Kaf

r El

shik

h

Ban

ha

Dam

iett

a

Dam

nh

ou

r

Kaf

r El

da

war



4.1.4 Red Sea Region

This graph shows network performance in terms of CALL DROP RATE for the mobile operators in Red Sea Region divided to six main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities represented by


This graph shows network performance in terms of CALL BLOCK RATE for the mobile operators in Red Sea Region divided to six main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities represented by





This graph shows network performance in terms of BAD VOICE QUALITY RATE for the mobile operators in Red Sea Region divided to six main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities


1.4%

1.0%

1.3%

0.9%

1.8%

1.0%

1.6%

0.3%

1.6%

0.7%

0.0%

0.7%

0.0%

0.3

%

0.0%

1.1%

0.6%

0.3%

0.9%

0.3

%

0.0%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%Is

ma

ilia

Po

rt s

aid

Suez

Hu

rgad

a

Shar

m

Dah

ab

No

uib

aa

Ismailia Port said Suez Red Sea South Sinai

Orange Vodafone Etisalat Threshold0.

7%

2.8

%

1.5%

1.2%

0.9%

4.1%

0.3%

0.0%

0.4

%

0.5%

0.6%

0.7

%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.6

%

1.5%

0.3%

0.0%

0.7%

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

Ism

aili

a

Po

rt s

aid

Suez

Hu

rgad

a

Shar

m

Dah

ab

No

uib

aa



1.0%

1.6%

0.6%

1.5%

0.3%

0.7%

0.3%

0.0%

0.2%

0.0%

0.0%

0.3%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.4%

0.2%

0.6%

0.3%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

Ism

aili

a

Po

rt s

aid

Suez

Hu

rgad

a

Shar

m

Dah

ab

No

uib

aa



The graphs show network performance in terms of VOICE QUALITY MOS Scores values for the mobile operators in Red Sea Region divided to six main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main

Cities. The Min and Max MOS values are represented by the bar charts and the Mean MOS value is represented by the line chart.


1.6 1.

8

1.6

1.1

2.3

1.5

2.7

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.1 3.9 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.0

4.2

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

Ism

aili

a

Po

rt s

aid

Suez

Hu

rgad

a

Shar

m

Dah

ab

No

uib

aa


Orange Voice(Min) Orange Voice(Max) Orange Voice(Mean)2.

9

2.7

1.9 2.

3

2.2

3.8

3.7

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.3 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

Ism

aili

a

Po

rt s

aid

Suez

Hu

rgad

a

Shar

m

Dah

ab

No

uib

aa



2.9

2.9

2.1

1.6

2.6

3.2

0.0

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.2 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.2

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

Ism

aili

a

Po

rt s

aid

Suez

Hu

rgad

a

Shar

m

Dah

ab

No

uib

aa



4.1.5 Upper Egypt Region

This graph shows network performance in terms of BAD VOICE QUALITY RATE for the mobile operators in Upper Egypt Region divided to eight main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities


This graph shows network performance in terms of CALL DROP RATE for the mobile operators in Upper Egypt Region divided to eight main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities


This graph shows network performance in terms of CALL BLOCK RATE for the mobile operators in Upper Egypt Region divided to eight main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities



Call Block Rate (%), September- 2016


0.0%

2.0%

0.9%

1.0

%

0.2%

0.0%

1.7%

0.6%

0.3%

0.3%

0.0%

0.0%

0.3%

0.7%

0.0%

0.0%

0.6%

0.0%

1.2%

0.7%

0.7%

0.7%

0.3%

1.4%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%Fa

you

m

Ban

y Sw

if

Me

nya

Asy

ou

t

Soh

ag

Qe

na

Luxo

r

Asw

an

Fayoum Bany Swif Menya Asyout Sohag Qena Louxor Aswan

Orange Vodafone Etisalat Threshold0.

3%

2.4%

0.9

%

0.7%

0.7

%

0.0%

0.3%

0.3

%

3.1%

0.3%

3.8%

2.7%

0.5%

0.0%

0.3%

0.0%

1.5%

0.0%

1.5%

1.3%

0.5

%

5.1%

0.0%

1.1%

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

Fayo

um

Ban

y Sw

if

Me

nya

Asy

ou

t

Soh

ag

Qe

na

Luxo

r

Asw

an



0.9%

0.3%

1.2%

1.3%

0.2%

0.0%

0.0%

0.6%

0.9%

0.0%

0.0%

0.3%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.3%

0.3%

0.0%

0.3%

0.0%

0.6%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

Fayo

um

Ban

y Sw

if

Me

nya

Asy

ou

t

Soh

ag

Qe

na

Luxo

r

Asw

anFayoum Bany Swif Menya Asyout Sohag Qena Louxor Aswan



The graphs show network performance in terms of VOICE QUALITY MOS Scores values for the mobile operators in Upper Egypt Region divided to eight main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to

main Cities represented by the bar charts.The Min and Max MOS values are represented by the bar charts and the Mean MOS value is represented by the line chart.

2.4

1.9

1.7 2.

0 2.1

3.0

2.7

2.4

4.4

4.4

4.4 4.

4 4.5

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.1 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

Fayo

um

Ban

y Sw

if

Me

nya

Asy

ou

t

Soh

ag

Qe

na

Luxo

r

Asw

an


Orange Voice(Min) Orange Voice(Max) Orange Voice(Mean)1.

7

2.4

1.4

2.2

2.1

3.1

1.2

3.5

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.0 4.3

4.0 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.3

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

Fayo

um

Ban

y Sw

if

Me

nya

Asy

ou

t

Soh

ag

Qe

na

Luxo

r

Asw

an



1.4

2.9

1.9

1.1

2.4

1.9

3.2

1.6

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.1 4.1 4.1 4.0 4.1 3.9

4.2 4.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

Fayo

um

Ban

y Sw

if

Me

nya

Asy

ou

t

Soh

ag

Qe

na

Luxo

r

Asw

an



4.2 Data Services Measurements

4.2.1 Cairo Region

September- 2016This graph shows network performance in terms of Video Streaming Time Proportion for the mobile operators in Cairo Region divided to five main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities

represented by the bar charts.

Video Streaming Time Proportion (%) ,

September- 2016

Ping Latency (m Sec), September- 2016

This graph shows network performance in terms of HTTP BROWSING TRANSFER TIME for the mobile operators in Cairo Region divided to five main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities


This graph shows network performance in terms of HTTP THROUGHPUT for the mobile operators in Cairo Region divided to five main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities represented by

the bar charts.

This graph shows network performance in terms of PING LATENCY for the mobile operators in Cairo Region divided to five main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities represented by the

bar charts.

HTTP Browsing Transfer Time (Sec) , September- 2016

HTTP Throughput (Kbps) ,

3165

3826

4977

4069

4954

3215

4483

3255

4100

4432

3518

4491

4209

3351

3988

4476

3569

4003

3903

5080

5185

4722

4492

4810

4110

4470

3632

3632

5996

5275

5223

2039

5366

3011

4835

6545

4659

4359

4417

3866

4786

4672

6916

5829

6323

4567

6648

5845

3875

5188

5198

4754

4756

3442

4973

3672

4663

2673

4325

3798

4124

5890

4872

4321

3038

2663

4200

3892

5070

4501

4437

6673

5017

5375

3887

4218

5467

4524

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

Nas

r C

ity

He

liop

oli

s

El S

ala

m

Ob

ou

r C

ity

Qo

bb

a G

ard

en

s

Ab

ba

ssia

Sher

ou

k -

Reh

ab C

ity

Taga

mo

a

Zaye

d

Oct

ob

er

Har

am

Fais

al

Mo

han

de

sin

Zam

ale

k

Do

wn

To

wn

Sho

bra

Emb

ab

a

Ain

Sh

am

s

Ma

adi

He

lwan

Mo

katt

am






Orange Vodafone Etisalat

7.2

7.2

6.4

6.9

6.7 10

.3

9.8 12

.5

8.5

6.9

6.8

7.4

7.6

6.8

7.2

6.3

6.8

6.6

6.5

11.2

6.8 7.9

8.5 9.5

9.9

9.3

18.8

12.9

10.2

7.3 9.

0

45.9

20.8

7.7

14.7

6.9

6.9 9.

4

9.9 11

.1

8.9 10

.2

8.9

9.5

8.4

9.0

8.7

8.7 11

.9

6.9 10

.0

8.9 9.8 11

.1

10.3

11.9

10.2

12.8

11.1

9.6 10

.9

11.0

11.1

9.8 13

.2

13.6

11.9

10.0

9.8

9.9

10.6

13.7

9.4 11

.0

10.3

12.9

12.4

11.9

0.05.0

10.015.020.025.030.035.040.045.050.0

Nas

r C

ity

He

liop

oli

s

El S

ala

m

Ob

ou

r C

ity

Qo

bb

a G

ard

en

s

Ab

ba

ssia

Sher

ou

k -

Reh

ab C

ity

Taga

mo

a

Zaye

d

Oct

ob

er

Har

am

Fais

al

Mo

han

de

sin

Zam

ale

k

Do

wn

To

wn

Sho

bra

Emb

ab

a

Ain

Sh

am

s

Ma

adi

He

lwan

Mo

katt

am







133.

8

127.

3

116.

0

123.

2

118.

0

130.

4

127.

6

131.

9

126.

2

122.

8

132.

2

130.

6

119.

5

138.

0

128.

0

144.

5

124.

7

134.

4

138.

3

121.

3

122.

7

126.

8

122.

9

131.

2

132.

9

129.

3

111.

5

94.4

83.9

53.7

84.3

94.8

53.7

45.5

77.5

53.2

55.0

100.

0

88.9

102.

8

79.3

82.2

76.6

79.3

85.1

78.6

84.1

82.7

72.0

53.9

86.0

70.7

100.

0

90.0

115.

0

73.9

100.

0

120.

0

110.

0

99.0

100.

9

50.5

62.8

151.

6

87.8

92.1

88.0

138.

9

199.

0

168.

0

182.

3

58.8

220.

2

153.

0

113.

0

120.

0

134.

0

122.

0

0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

Nas

r C

ity

He

liop

oli

s

El S

ala

m

Ob

ou

r C

ity

Qo

bb

a G

ard

en

s

Ab

ba

ssia

Sher

ou

k -

Reh

ab C

ity

Taga

mo

a

Zaye

d

Oct

ob

er

Har

am

Fais

al

Mo

han

de

sin

Zam

ale

k

Do

wn

To

wn

Sho

bra

Emb

ab

a

Ain

Sh

am

s

Ma

adi

He

lwan

Mo

katt

am






Orange Vodafone Etisalat0.

6%

0.2%

0.0%

0.1

%

0.1%

0.2

%

1.0%

0.2%

0.4%

0.4%

0.2%

0.3

%

0.2%

0.3%

0.2%

0.2%

0.2%

0.2%

0.3%

0.0%

0.0

%

0.1%

0.4%

0.0%

1.9%

0.8%

5.1%

1.5%

1.6%

0.7%

0.1%

1.0%

1.0%

0.1%

1.2%

0.6%

0.9%

2.8%

1.0%

2.2%

1.3%

1.1%

0.5%

0.8%

0.6%

0.5

%

0.2%

0.4%

3.3%

0.6%

2.0%

1.5

%

1.1

%

0.4

%

0.4%

0.4%

1.2

%

0.4%

0.4%

0.7%

0.6%

0.0%

0.0%

0.2%

0.7

%

1.0%

0.4%

0.9%

1.1

%

1.0%

2.8%

0.1%

0.2%

0.9%

0.2%

0.9

%

2.0%

1.1%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

Nas

r C

ity

He

liop

oli

s

El S

ala

m

Ob

ou

r C

ity

Qo

bb

aG

ard

ens

Ab

ba

ssia

Sher

ou

k -

Re

hab

Cit

y

Taga

mo

a

Zaye

d

Oct

ob

er

Har

am

Fais

al

Mo

han

de

sin

Zam

ale

k

Do

wn

To

wn

Sho

bra

Emb

ab

a

Ain

Sh

am

s

Ma

adi

He

lwan

Mo

katt

am

East Cairo East West Cairo West Cairo Center Cairo North Cairo North South Cairo South


4.2.2 Alex & Northern Coast Region

HTTP Throughput (Kbps) , September- 2016

This graph shows network performance in terms of HTTP THROUGHPUT for the mobile operators in Alex & Northern Coast Region represented by the bar charts.

This graph shows network performance in terms of PING LATENCY for the mobile operators in Alex & Northern Coast Region represented by the bar charts.



This graph shows network performance in terms of HTTP BROWSING TRANSFER TIME for the mobile operators in Alex & Northern Coast Region represented by the bar charts.

Video Streaming Time Proportion (%) , September- 2016

This graph shows network performance in terms of Video Streaming Time Proportion for the mobile operators in Alex & Northern Coast Region represented by the bar charts.

3670

3601

3371

3611

4383

5890

5752

9788

5095

4885

5789

8020

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

East

Ale

x

Wes

t A

lex



12.2

10.9

16.9

12.6

11.6

9.3

12.0

13.2

10.4

11.1

13.0

11.9

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

East

Ale

x

Wes

t A

lex



145.

3

147.

8

176.

5

158.

9

91.1

49.1

65.5

40.1

61.3

62.1

59.9

51.7

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

140.0

160.0

180.0

200.0

East

Ale

x

Wes

t A

lex



0.8%

0.8%

0.7%

0.8%

1.6%

0.5

%

0.2%

0.1%

0.2%

0.2%

0.0%

0.1%

0.0%

0.2%

0.4%

0.6%

0.8%

1.0%

1.2%

1.4%

1.6%

1.8%

East

Ale

x

Wes

t A

lex



4.2.3 Delta Region




This graph shows network performance in terms of HTTP BROWSING TRANSFER TIME for the mobile operators in Delta Region divided to eight main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities



This graph shows network performance in terms of HTTP THROUGHPUT for the mobile operators in Delta Region divided to eight main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities represented

by the bar charts.

This graph shows network performance in terms of PING LATENCY for the mobile operators in Delta Region divided to eight main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities represented by the

bar charts.

This graph shows network performance in terms of Video Streaming Time Proportion for the mobile operators in Delta Region divided to eight main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities


5491

2647

2510

2839

6417

5965

4343

5576

3461

5972

2637

935

6238

3833

4282

3212

4288

3526

4306

3967

5445

4680

4123

5866

4062

2293

5696

4510

5392

6678

5609

4903

3554

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

Zaga

zig

10th

of

Ram

adan

Tan

ta

Mah

alla

Sheb

in

Man

sou

ra

Kaf

r El

shik

h

Ban

ha

Dam

iett

a

Dam

nh

ou

r

Kaf

r El

daw

ar



12.4

10.7

14.0

13.5

10.4

11.5

15.3

15.2

14.2

10.8

23.4

9.3

5.8 9.

8

9.6

10.0

10.4

8.9

9.7

109.

3

18.5

6.1 13

.5

10.3

13.8

13.3

9.0 13

.0

11.4

9.4 11

.1

9.2 12

.8

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

Zaga

zig

10

th o

f R

am

ada

n

Tan

ta

Ma

hal

la

Sheb

in

Ma

nso

ura

Kaf

r El

shik

h

Ban

ha

Dam

iett

a

Dam

nh

ou

r

Kaf

r El

da

war



139.

5

143.

0

136.

9

133.

6

126.

1

150.

8

146.

0

117.

8

146.

1

133.

0

137.

4

78.7

47.2

76.3

70.1

85.1

87.3

95.0

76.3

77.8

52.7

49.7

69.2

62.9

65.1

66.6

59.6

73.8

67.1

119.

0

77.8

55.9

66.7

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

140.0

160.0

Zaga

zig

10

th o

f R

am

ada

n

Tan

ta

Ma

hal

la

Sheb

in

Ma

nso

ura

Kaf

r El

shik

h

Ban

ha

Dam

iett

a

Dam

nh

ou

r

Kaf

r El

da

war


Orange Vodafone Etisalat0.

6%

0.4%

2.0%

0.7

%

0.0

%

0.4%

0.0

%

0.6%

2.5%

0.4

%

6.8%

0.3%

0.6%

6.8

%

0.6

%

2.8%

2.2%

0.1%

3.0%

2.9%

0.6%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.5%

0.1%

0.0%

0.1

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0%

0.0

%

0.2%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

Zaga

zig

10th

of

Ram

adan

Tan

ta

Mah

alla

Sheb

in

Man

sou

ra

Kaf

r El

shik

h

Ban

ha

Dam

iett

a

Dam

nh

ou

r

Kaf

r El

daw

ar



4.2.4 Red Sea Region


September- 2016This graph shows network performance in terms of HTTP BROWSING TRANSFER TIME for the mobile operators in Red Sea Region divided to six main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities


This graph shows network performance in terms of Video Streaming Time Proportion for the mobile operators in Red Sea Region divided to six main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities


This graph shows network performance in terms of HTTP THROUGHPUT for the mobile operators in Red Sea Region divided to six main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities represented

by the bar charts.

This graph shows network performance in terms of PING LATENCY for the mobile operators in Red Sea Region divided to six main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities represented by the

bar charts.



HTTP Browsing Transfer Time (Sec) ,

4237

2950

5625

3872

6137

1007

1353

5838

4630

5035

5960

3304

6508

1499

5841

5657

6145

6378

6399

4837

4710

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Ism

aili

a

Po

rt s

aid

Suez

Hu

rgad

a

Shar

m

Dah

ab

No

uib

aa



7.0

14.3

10.5

9.5

9.3

18.8

11.4

9.1

8.5

7.2

7.4 8.

1

9.7

15.1

10.4

11.4

10.9

10.6

10.4

11.0

11.5

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

Ism

aili

a

Po

rt s

aid

Suez

Hu

rgad

a

Shar

m

Dah

ab

No

uib

aa



132.

7

132.

7 147.

9

150.

3

114.

1

228.

9

220.

0

37.6

49.4

51.0

53.0

102.

8

101.

0

210.

0

52.1

58.8

59.5

68.1

55.5

57.3

60.4

0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

Ism

aili

a

Po

rt s

aid

Suez

Hu

rgad

a

Shar

m

Dah

ab

No

uib

aa



0.0

%

2.0

%

0.7%

0.0

%

0.0

%

4.2%

1.0%

1.0%

0.8%

1.2%

0.2%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0%

0.0%

0.4%

0.1%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.7%

0.1%

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

4.5%

Ism

aili

a

Po

rt s

aid

Suez

Hu

rgad

a

Shar

m

Dah

ab

No

uib

aa



4.2.5 Upper Egypt Region

This graph shows network performance in terms of Video Streaming Time Proportion for the mobile operators in Upper Egypt Region divided to eight main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main

Cities represented by the bar charts.

This graph shows network performance in terms of HTTP BROWSING TRANSFER TIME for the mobile operators in Upper Egypt Region divided to eight main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to

main Cities represented by the bar charts.

This graph shows network performance in terms of HTTP THROUGHPUT for the mobile operators in Upper Egypt Region divided to eight main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities




This graph shows network performance in terms of PING LATENCY for the mobile operators in Upper Egypt Region divided to eight main Subregions and each Subregion is divided to main Cities represented

by the bar charts.



2370

2163

2789

3201

2242

2134

2443

2049

4304

5807

2708

5064

4030

3139

3456

5363

4503

4588

4175

3775

2860

3170

3963

3962

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Fayo

um

Ban

y Sw

if

Me

nya

Asy

ou

t

Soh

ag

Qe

na

Luxo

r

Asw

an



9.0

11.7

10.2

9.2

14.0

8.4 9.

2

11.3

8.6

7.6

20.2

10.2

8.5 9.

7

19.7

7.0

13.1

12.3

14.4

14.0

12.3

11.5

10.8

11.9

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

Fayo

um

Ban

y Sw

if

Me

nya

Asy

ou

t

Soh

ag

Qe

na

Luxo

r

Asw

an



199.

2 218.

0

194.

0

164.

1

214.

8

133.

2

170.

2

152.

3

56.1

42.5

91.5

59.7

51.6

62.3

63.1

49.5

66.0

54.7

61.8

56.5

89.0

66.2

55.9

63.0

0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

Fayo

um

Ban

y Sw

if

Me

nya

Asy

ou

t

Soh

ag

Qe

na

Luxo

r

Asw

an



1.8

%

3.2%

1.6%

0.4%

2.1%

1.3%

0.8%

0.4

%

0.1%

0.0%

1.4%

0.4%

0.5

%

1.5%

5.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.3%

2.6%

0.7%

0.7%

0.2%

0.4%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

Fayo

um

Ban

y Sw

if

Me

nya

Asy

ou

t

Soh

ag

Qe

na

Luxo

r

Asw

an



ntra mobile qos monthly eport · 2016-11-28 · • benchmarking capabilities in the form of...

Documents