ns4301 summer term 2015 population/demographics. population i 2 “population debate will gain...

12
NS4301 Summer Term 2015 Population/Demographics

Upload: carmel-turner

Post on 04-Jan-2016

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NS4301 Summer Term 2015 Population/Demographics. Population I 2 “Population Debate Will Gain Prominence,” Oxford Analytica, October 25, 2011 Debate about

NS4301 Summer Term 2015

Population/Demographics

Page 2: NS4301 Summer Term 2015 Population/Demographics. Population I 2 “Population Debate Will Gain Prominence,” Oxford Analytica, October 25, 2011 Debate about

Population I

2

• “Population Debate Will Gain Prominence,” Oxford Analytica, October 25, 2011

• Debate about how many people are too many has a long history

• Confidence in humankind’s ability to feed and cloth itself has risen and fallen over the centuries

• Work of Thomas Malthus (1766-1834) has been associated with a pessimistic view of growing populations

• His main worry was with the food supply but areas of concern have expanded since to include:

• Water,

• Mineral and energy resources, as well as

• Environmental issues including effect of population on greenhouse gas emissions and hence world’s climate.

Page 3: NS4301 Summer Term 2015 Population/Demographics. Population I 2 “Population Debate Will Gain Prominence,” Oxford Analytica, October 25, 2011 Debate about

Population II• Pessimistic View• Neo-Malthusians stress that many improvements the world has

experienced have been due to increased use of:

• Fossil fuels and

• Nitrogen-based fertilizers• Problem these have serious long-term effects that are starting to

assert themselves:

• Climate change provoked by green house gas emissions

• Reduced soil fertility and

• Pollution

• Increasing populations are putting pressure on water supplies and ancient aquifers are beginning to run dry

• Prices of key minerals and food have been rising for most of the last decade

• Result: may generate political instability as food and household costs escalate 3

Page 4: NS4301 Summer Term 2015 Population/Demographics. Population I 2 “Population Debate Will Gain Prominence,” Oxford Analytica, October 25, 2011 Debate about

Population III

4

• Optimistic View

• Important to distinguish between

• short term – where prices rise and resources become scarce and

• Long term within which human ingenuity responds to those changes by finding new ways of fulfilling needs and wants more easily and cheaply

• In addition not all problems of environmental degradation, resource scarcity and price rises are due to population increase

• In many situations bad politics, social injustice, corruption and conflict cause more harm

• Economic success of emerging economies in recent decades as increased demand for commodities and in the absence of an equivalent increase in production and thus their prices.

Page 5: NS4301 Summer Term 2015 Population/Demographics. Population I 2 “Population Debate Will Gain Prominence,” Oxford Analytica, October 25, 2011 Debate about

Population IV• While the Classsicals tended to look at growing

populations as a threat to prosperity, we now often view growing populations as important for growth

• As countries transition from high to low death and birth rates, the population’s age structure changes and the economically dependent-proportion declines

• This transition can create one (or more) forms of “demographic dividend”:

• Labor supply increases as a greater proportion of total populations joins the working age group (15-64 years)

• As each worker’s number of dependents falls, the worker is able to save more to finance deepening of the capital stock and to raise labor productivity

• As dependency declines, more can be invested in healthcare and education for each child raising the quality of the human capital stock

• As per capita income increases, demand increases for consumer goods.

5

Page 6: NS4301 Summer Term 2015 Population/Demographics. Population I 2 “Population Debate Will Gain Prominence,” Oxford Analytica, October 25, 2011 Debate about

Population V

• Some analysts attribute the extremely fast economic growth in a number of Asian countries – Hong Kong, Singapore, and South Korea between the 1960s and 1990s to a demographic dividend

• Studies argue that a sizable portion – in some cases up to one third, of the increase in GDP per capita during those decades could be ascribed to positive impact of demographic changes.

• However unclear whether this experience is repeatable elsewhere and

• Whether in other countries similar demographic changes could actually have adverse effects

• Moreover seem to be scope for significant economic development even without such demographic changes.

6

Page 7: NS4301 Summer Term 2015 Population/Demographics. Population I 2 “Population Debate Will Gain Prominence,” Oxford Analytica, October 25, 2011 Debate about

Population VI

7

Page 8: NS4301 Summer Term 2015 Population/Demographics. Population I 2 “Population Debate Will Gain Prominence,” Oxford Analytica, October 25, 2011 Debate about

Population VII

• Even if a country experiences an increase in the relative size of its working age population there is no guarantee this will turn into economic development

• What happens will depend on the use that the government and private sector make of such a window of opportunity to:

• Increase the workforce participation rate – the proportion of the working age population that is productively employed; and

• Provide opportunities for the efficient investment of the expected higher levels of savings associated with a larger working age population.

8

Page 9: NS4301 Summer Term 2015 Population/Demographics. Population I 2 “Population Debate Will Gain Prominence,” Oxford Analytica, October 25, 2011 Debate about

Population VIII

• Important areas of public policy that need to make use of the demographic dividend include

• Improving and making the public health system more effective

• Increasing the provision and quality of education

• Introducing economic policies that promote labor market flexibility, openness to trade and savings.

• Negative Scenario

• A reduction in the number of children can provide breathing space for countries enabling them to develop infrastructure and policies capable of yielding higher growth rates in the future

9

Page 10: NS4301 Summer Term 2015 Population/Demographics. Population I 2 “Population Debate Will Gain Prominence,” Oxford Analytica, October 25, 2011 Debate about

Population IX

• Yet trying to coordinate such a combination of demographic and institutional changes may prove difficult;

• Country could find itself in a situation where hit has a high proportion of working age citizens who are not productively employed

• Might be left unprepared for an inevitable aging of its population

• Rather than a demographic dividend the country could experience problems of youths

• In these situations the unemployed or underemployed are often prone to violent behavior

10

Page 11: NS4301 Summer Term 2015 Population/Demographics. Population I 2 “Population Debate Will Gain Prominence,” Oxford Analytica, October 25, 2011 Debate about

Population X

• Many countries are now more concerned with declining or slowing rates of population growth

• Demand side started with Hansen and the stagnationists in the 1930s – slowing population would require less investments – feeding back to slack demand and slow growth -- vicious circle

• Supply side view – neoclassicals 1950s – demographic dividend facilitated East Asia miracle

• Over the next 40 years Japan and Europe will see working-age populations shrink by 30 million and 37 million respectively

• China’s working age population will keep growing for 15 years or so then turn down.

• In 2050 China will have 100 million fewer workers than it does today

11

Page 12: NS4301 Summer Term 2015 Population/Demographics. Population I 2 “Population Debate Will Gain Prominence,” Oxford Analytica, October 25, 2011 Debate about

Population XI

12