nox emission study - presentation 2011-12-19
TRANSCRIPT
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 1/24
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 2/24
© Metso
Method of analysis
• Data analysis in this report is based on the process data collected
from the boiler plants listed in the section 3.3. The process data has
been collected as validated hourly averages.
• For improving confidence of the data analysis, all data from each
boiler has been screened to exclude time periods when
- Boiler output steam flow is zero (boiler is off)- Boiler output steam flow measurements are outside 99 % confidence range
2
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 3/24
© Metso
Studied boiler plants
• None of the six studied boiler plants are base-load plants but all of
them supply heat to industrial processes and to district heat network.
• Plants are located in different parts of Finland.
Plant [MWfuel] Boiler
type
Main fuels SNCR Year of
start-up
Kaukaan Voima 410 CFB CHP Biomass and peat Yes 2009
Kymin Voima 294 BFB CHP Biomass, peat and sludge No 2002
Porin
Prosessivoima
206 CFB CHP Biomass, peat and REF Yes 2009
Rauman Voima 120 BFB CHP Biomass, peat, REF and
sludge
Yes 2006
Stora EnsoVeitsiluoto
280 BFB CHP Biomass, peat and sludge No 1996
Tornion Voima 143 CFB CHP Peat, biomass and CO gas Yes 2007
3
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 4/24
© Metso
Fuel mixtures
• The average fuel N-content calculated on a monthly basis
• N-content reflects the fuel mix changes which are due to the season,fuel availability and boiler operational reasons
• Nitrogen content is expressed by weight percent in dry matter
4
1 2 3 4 5 60
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Nitrogen content of fuel mix
N i t r o g e n - %
Month
BFB boiler 1
BFB boiler 2
BFB boiler 3
1 2 3 4 5 60
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Nitrogen content of fuel mix
N i t r o g e n - %
Month
CFB boiler 1
CFB boiler 2
CFB boiler 3
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 5/24
© Metso
Effect of peat on the fuel mix nitrogen content
• Nitrogen content of
peat itself depends
on the geographical
location of the peat
field
5
0 50 1000
1
2
3
Nitrogen share in fuel mix vs. Peat share
N i t r o g e n %
Peat %
BFB boiler 1
0 50 1000
1
2
3
N i t r o g e n %
Peat %
BFB boiler 2
0 50 1000
1
2
3
N i
t r o g e n %
Peat %
BFB boiler 3
0 50 1000
1
2
3
Nitrogen share in fuel mix vs. Peat share
N i t r o g e n %
Peat %
CFB boiler 1
0 50 1000
1
2
3
N i t r o g e n %
Peat %
CFB boiler 2
0 50 1000
1
2
3
N i
t r o g e n %
Peat %
CFB boiler 3
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 6/24
© Metso
Effect of fuel N on NOx in BFB:s 1 and 3
• Illustration of correlation between SO2 and NOx emissions. It is liableto assume that higher SO2 emission reflect higher fuel’s nitrogen
content at that particular time.
6
0 100 200 300 400 5000
200
400
N O x - m g / N m 3
NOx - SO2 fit
BFB boiler 1
0 50 100 150 2000
200
400
N O x - m g / N m 3
SO2 - mg/Nm3
BFB boiler 3
Typical N
% (dry
matter)
TypicalS
% (dry
matter)
Biomass
from wood
0,1 – 0,5 0,05
Peat 1,3 – 3,0 0,2 – 0,4
Emission expressed in mg/Nm3 6 % O2 in
dry gas
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 7/24
© Metso
Annual boiler load variations
Measure BFB 1 BFB 2 BFB 3 Average of
BFB 1-3
%
Max 106 112 99 106
High 99% limit 100 105 91 99
Mean 69 56 50 58
Low 99% limit 47 37 26 37
Min 24 27 26 26
7
Measure CFB 1 CFB 2 CFB 3 Average of
CFB 1-3
%
Max 100 109 106 105
High 99% limit 96 108 101 102
Mean 68 79 82 76
Low 99% limit 38 35 48 40
Min 11 17 38 22
0 50 1000
5
Breakdown of boiler load
%
BFB boiler 1
0 50 1000
5
%
BFB boiler 2
0 50 1000
5 %
Boiler load (%)
BFB boiler 3
0 50 1000
5
Breakdown of boiler load
%
CFB boiler 1
0 50 1000
5
%
CFB boiler 2
0 50 1000
5 %
Boiler load (%)
CFB boiler 3
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 8/24
© Metso
NOx emissions
8
0 1 2 3 4 50
200
400
NOx trend
m g / N m 3
Month
BFB boiler 1
0 1 2 3 4 50
200
400
m g / N m 3
Month
BFB boiler 2
0 1 2 3 4 50
200
400
m g / N m 3
Month
BFB boiler 3
0 1 2 3 4 50
200
400
NOx trend
m g / N m 3
Month
CFB boiler 1
0 1 2 3 4 50
200
400
m g / N m
3
Month
CFB boiler 2
0 1 2 3 4 50
200
400
m g / N m 3
Month
CFB boiler 3
Not calendar monthsEmission expressed in mg/Nm3 6 % O2 in dry gas
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 9/24
© Metso
99 % confidence regions for NOx emissions
9
BFB 1 BFB 2 BFB 3
0
100
200
300
400
500
80
171126
260 258290
401353
438
NOx 99% confidence range
m g / N m 3
CFB 1 CFB 2 CFB 3
0
100
200
300
400
500
1359
86
133 134 144
240 250216
NOx 99% confidence range
m g / N m 3
• High 99 % limit, mean and low
99 % limit values are plotted
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 10/24
© Metso
NOx emission statistics
10
Measure BFB 1 BFB 2 BFB 3
mg/Nm3 % mg/Nm3 % mg/Nm3 %
Max 437 168 478 185 1038 357.5
High 99% limit 401 154 353 137 438 151
Mean 260 100 258 100 290 100
Low 99 % limit 80 31 171 66 126 43
Min 53 20 56 22 65 22
Std 55 21 37 14 48 17
COV 21 % 14 % 17 %
Measure CFB 1 CFB 2 CFB 3
mg/Nm3 % mg/Nm3 % mg/Nm3 %
Max 342 257 286 214 306 212
High 99% limit 240 180 250 187 216 150
Mean 133 100 134 100 144 100
Low 99 % limit 13 95 59 44 86 60
Min 0.003 0.02 34 25 31 21
Std 5 21 37 27 25 17
COV 21 % 27 % 17 %
Emission expressed in mg/Nm3 6 % O2 in dry gas
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 11/24
© Metso
Monthly averages of NOx emission
11
1 2 3 4 50
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
NOx averages
m g / N m 3
Month
BFB boiler 1
BFB boiler 2
BFB boiler 3
1 2 3 4 50
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
NOx averages
m g / N m 3
Month
CFB boiler 1
CFB boiler 2
CFB boiler 3
Not calendar monthsEmission expressed in mg/Nm3 6 % O2 in dry gas
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 12/24
© Metso
Breakdowns of NOx emission
12
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000
1
2
3
4
Breakdown of NOx
%
NOx (mg/Nm3)
BFB boiler 1
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000
1
2
3
4
%
NOx (mg/Nm3)
BFB boiler 2
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000
1
2
3
4
%
NOx (mg/Nm3)
BFB boiler 3
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000
5
10
Breakdown of NOx
%
mg/Nm3
CFB boiler 1
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000
5
10
%
mg/Nm3
CFB boiler 2
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000
5
10
%
mg/Nm3
CFB boiler 3
Vertical-axis shows % disperse of NOx emissions
Emission expressed in mg/Nm3 6 % O2 in dry gas
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 13/24
© Metso
Combustion circumstances affecting NOxemissions - background
• The degree of explanation between the NOx emission and eachcombustion variable are shown at following tables. The explanation
degree for perfect match is 100 % whereas 0 % explanation degree
indicates that there does not exist explanation between two
variables.
• For estimating impact of fuel nitrogen content to the NOx
emissions,
the fuel nitrogen content is indirectly represented by the SO2
emission which in the case of peat and wood biomass burning
correlates in BFB boilers with fuel N and NOx emissions. Some
factors e.g. SNCR, other sulphur containing fuels and SO2 control
methods can weaken the correlation
13
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 14/24
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 15/24
© Metso
NOx emissions and boiler load
15
0 50 1000
200
400
m g / N m 3
NOx - Boiler load fit
BFB boiler 1
0 50 1000
200
400
m g / N m 3
NOx - Boiler load fit
CFB boiler 1
20 40 60 80 1000
200
400
m g / N m
3
BFB boiler 2
20 40 60 80 1000
200
400
m g / N m
3
CFB boiler 2
20 40 60 80 1000
200
400
m g / N m 3
Boiler load (%)
BFB boiler 3
20 40 60 80 1000
200
400
m g / N m 3
Boiler load (%)
CFB boiler 3
• NOx emission of the BFBboilers does not stay constant
at different boiler loads but,
instead, it heavily tends to
increase at low loads below 35
% - 50 % and also at the high
load over 70 % for the BFB
boiler 2
• For CFB boilers, the NOx
emission has a minimum
typically with in load range of
60 - 80 %. The emission
increases at low and high end
boiler loads. Use of SNCRsystem evens out the variation.
Emission expressed in mg/Nm3 6 % O2 in dry gas
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 16/24
© Metso
NOx emissions and boiler load
16
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
100
200
300
400
500
NOx vs. Boiler load
m g / N m 3
Boiler load (%)
BFB boiler 1
BFB boiler 2
BFB boiler 3
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
100
200
300
400
500
m g / N m 3
Boiler load (%)
CFB boiler 1
CFB boiler 2
CFB boiler 3
Emission expressed in mg/Nm3 6 % O2 in dry gas
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 17/24
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 18/24
© Metso
NOx emissions and air staging
18
10 20 30 40 50 60 700
100
200
300
400
500
NOx vs. OFA/Total air
m g / N m 3
OFA/Total air ratio (%)
BFB boiler 1
BFB boiler 2
BFB boiler 3
10 20 30 40 50 60 700
100
200
300
400
500
m g / N m 3
OFA/Total air ratio (%)
CFB boiler 1
CFB boiler 2
CFB boiler 3
Emission expressed in mg/Nm3 6 % O2 in dry gas
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 19/24
© Metso
NOx emissions and flue gas oxygen
• The NOx emission of bothBFB and CFB boilers
increases proportional to
flue gas oxygen level
19
0 2 4 6 80
200
400
m g / N m 3
NOx vs. residual oxygen
BFB boiler 1
0 2 4 6 80
200
400
m g / N m 3
NOx - Residual oxygen fit
CFB boiler 1
0 2 4 6 80
200
400
m g / N m
3BFB boiler 2
0 2 4 6 80
200
400
m g / N m
3CFB boiler 2
0 2 4 6 80
200
400
m g / N m 3
Residual oxygen (%)
BFB boiler 3
0 2 4 6 80
200
400
m g / N m 3
Residual oxygen (%)
CFB boiler 3
Emission expressed in mg/Nm3 6 % O2 in dry gas
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 20/24
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 21/24
© Metso
NOx emissions and CO emissions
• The NOx emissionsdecrease when the
CO emissions increase
21
0 100 200 300 400 5000
200
400
m g / N m 3
NOx - CO fit
BFB boiler 1
0 50 1000
200
400
m g / N m 3
NOx - CO fit
CFB boiler 1
0 50 1000
200
400
m g / N m
3
BFB boiler 2
0 50 1000
200
400
m g / N m
3
CFB boiler 2
0 50 1000
200
400
m
g / N m 3
CO (mg/Nm3)
BFB boiler 3
0 50 1000
200
400
m
g / N m 3
CO (mg/Nm3)
CFB boiler 3
Emission expressed in mg/Nm3 6 % O2 in dry gas
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 22/24
© Metso
NOx emissions and CO emissions
22
0 50 100 150 2000
100
200
300
400
500
NOx vs. CO
m g / N m 3
Flue gas CO (mg/Nm3)
BFB boiler 1
BFB boiler 2
BFB boiler 3
0 50 100 150 2000
100
200
300
400
500
m g / N m 3
Flue gas CO (mg/Nm3)
CFB boiler 1
CFB boiler 2
CFB boiler 3
Emission expressed in mg/Nm3 6 % O2 in dry gas
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 23/24
© Metso
Conclusions
• Six fluidized bed boilers located in Finland were analyzed based onprocess data retrieved from the boilers for a 5-6 month operation
period. The data was collected during the normal operation without
any specific tests on the boilers. Based on the data analysis, the
following conclusions can be drawn:
- Boiler load, fuel’s nitrogen content, flue gas oxygen level in furnace and
combustion air staging are the most important variables on NOx emission- Fuel nitrogen content and NOx emission have a strong correlation. As the
nitrogen content of the fuel increases the NOx emission increases especially in
BFB boilers.
- At low boiler loads NOx emissions increase. Depending on the boiler
dimensioning, emissions can also increase at high boiler load.
- Flue gas oxygen level correlates with NOx emission level. The higher the flue gas
oxygen level is the higher the NOx emission.- The effects of different variables on NOx emissions cannot always be generalized
because all boilers are unique (design, fuel etc.)
23
8/13/2019 Nox Emission Study - Presentation 2011-12-19
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nox-emission-study-presentation-2011-12-19 24/24
© Metso
Conclusions
• Based on different features in combustion technologies of BFB andCFB, the NOx emissions, when using only primary methods are
higher in BFB compared to CFB boilers. Both technologies, BFB and
CFB, have their own benefits and optimum areas concerning fuel
palette used in the boiler, targeted emission limits and economic
aspects. Selection is being done case by case after evaluating these
factors.
• For new boilers the emission requirements can be taken into account
by boiler design and applicable secondary methods. The
performance of an existing boiler depends on the design. The lowest
reachable NOx
level and the cost of the required investment must be
studied case specifically.
24