notes papilionidae (lepidoptera) from

The Lepidopterological Society of Japan

NII-Electronic Library Service

The LepidopterologicalSociety of Japan

ncLma 7)･ans. IepiaL Soc lapan 49(3):219 228, June 1998

Notes on some Papilionidae (Lepidoptera) from Indonesia

J. J. M. MooNEN

W, ALexanderstraat 4, 6267 AR Cadier & Keer, the Netherlands

Abstract Study of literature and of specimens, mainly in the collection of the Zoelogical

Museum of Amsterdam (ZMA), lead to the fo11owing conclusions and alterations. The correct

name of Pachfiopta nqptunzas from N. E. Sumatra is Pachliopta neptunus sthorangitana (Tsu-kada&Nish{yama, 1980) because Il neptunus sumatrana Hagen is suppressed as invalid byhomonymy. Since Graphium milon (C. & R. Felder, 1864) is a nornen nudum the corrbct name

for this species becomes Graphium anthedon (C. & R. Felder, 1864). A review ofthe species isgiven. The suggestion is made to treat Graphium monticolum Fruhstorfer as a distinct speciesfor Nature Conservation reasons and its uncertain gtatus, Pcrpillo dletnoleus Linnaeus is `success-

fu11y' introduced in Java and two specirnens of Graphium weiskei Ribbe are found on Java,Rembang. The female of G"aphium encelades (Boisduval) is figured fpr the first time. And

finally Papieio polytes aipheios Jordan appears to be synonymous to Papillo alphenor perversusRothschild, whose range extends from N. Sulawesi, Minahasa to the Talaud lslands. Papitfo

polytes aicinclor OberthUr also occurs {n N. Sulawesi and maybe in Sangihe.

Key words Papilionidae. Hagen (1894), Papnto hewitsonii var. sumatrana, Papillo neptunus

yar. sumatvana, Pmpillo cloanthus var. sumatrana, Pach2iopta nqptunus sthorangitana, Gra-phium sumatranum, Graphium milo' n, Graphium anthedon, Graphium mentibotum, Graphiumweiskei, Graphiu,n enceladlas, Pcu)nto demoleus, Papinb polytes aipheios, Papiilo aiphenor

perversus, synenyms, Indonesia, taxonomy,

Introduction

New findings from old and new collections and the renewed study ofliterature on this subjectlead to sQme corrections and supplementary alterations of our knowledge of the species

concerned.

PZvchlibpta neptunus sthorangitana (Tsukada&Nishiyama, 1980), comb. noy.

Losaria neptunzLs sthorangitana Tsukada & Nishiyama, 1980, in Tsukada, E. (Ed.), ButteijZies South East

Asian tslands 1: 259, pl. 52, figs 3-4.PapiiZo neptunus var. sumatrana Hagen, 1894, DL enn Z Irts 7: 21 (nec Hagen, 1894).

In 1894, Hagen described in his article three PapiTlo taxa under the name sumauana : Papillohewrtsonil' var. sumauana (p.20), PopiVlo neptunus var. sumauana (p.21) and Papillocloanthus var. sumanana (p. 28), These names were al1 proposed as varieties with the same

concept as subspecies in the modern sense and there is ne precedence among them Qther thanorder in appearance, Only of Papillo cloanthus surnatrana, Bridges (1988) mentioned that

it is a "homonyrn

in need of a replacement." Papillib hewitsonii var. sumauana is currentlyknown as a synonym ef Papido sinten' pemses Niceville, 1894 since Rothschild (1895), and I

think that a precedence should be given te either of the other two. Popdllo cloanthtns yar.

sumatrana is nowadays known as Graphium sumatranum (e. g Hancock, 1983) and Popilloneptunus var. sumatrana turns out to have ajunior synonym discussed below. In theinterests of nomenclatural stability, I think it better te give special precedence to Papi?lo

NII-Electronic Mbrary




220 J. J, M. MooNEN

cloanthus var. sumanana as an act of the first reviser (Recomrnendation 24A of Article 24of the Code), because in the reverse case a new name is needed for the fbrmer and a new

synonym appears in the latter. Then, PapiXlo neptunus var. sumatrana Hagen becomesinyalid as a junior primary homonym,

Papifib neptunus var. sumanana is finally known us Rachfibpta (:Lasaria) neptuntns

sumatrana, but there is a misunderstanding about the type locality of Papido neptunus var.

sumatrana. Hagen (1894) mentioned that his specimens came from "die Vorberge Delis"

(=the fbothills near Deli) in N. E. Sumatra, Bryk (1930) mentioned S. O. Sumatra (S, O,=SUd Ost== South East) in which he is fbllowed by Schrdder (1976) and Tsukada& Nishiyama

(1980), who described Lasanilri noptunus sthorangttana from Bandar Baru between Brastagiand Medan in N. Sumatra. The type locality is situated in the same area as Hagen'sVorberge Delis, and the description by Hagen (1894) matches the description of Tsukada&

Nishiyama (1980), So, Ptipillo neptunus yar. sumatrana Hagen and Lasan'a neptuntAs

sthorangttana Tsukada&Nishiyama concern the same taxon, Of these names, sumanana

becomes invalid by homonymy as above, and the current combination fbr this taxon is

Pachiiopta (Lasaria) neptunus sthorangitana (Tsukada&Nishiyama), comb. noy.

thaphiam sumatranum (Hagen, 1894)

Papilio cloanthus var. sumatrana Hagen, 1894, Dt ent ZL I)'is 7: 28.Graphiutn sumatranum : Hancock, I983,

PapiXlo cloanthus var. sumanana, a Grcrphium of the satlpedon group, is raised by Hancock

(l983) to a specific level. As mentioned above, Papi/lo cloanthus var. sumatruna Hagenshould be considered te have precedence over the two other sumauana proposed in the samearticle,

thaphium anthedon (C. & R, Felder), stat. noy.

Based on sympatric occurrence Murayama (1978) pointed out that (]raphium mtibn (C. & R,

Felder) is a distinct species and treated montilrotum (Fruhstorfer, 1896) as a subspecies of (1sailoedbn (Linnaeus, 1758). On the same ground Manin (1915) already treated G milon and

G monticolam as two species, but he never received recognition perhaps because he did notindicate a relation with the species Gl sarpedon (Linnaeus), Hancock (1983) saw milon as

a subspecies of G sarpedon and treated monticolam as the distinct species. With Tsukada &Nishiyama (1980), I agree with the two species : G, saipedon and a mdon. But because ofthe uncertain status of monticolam I think that it is best to treat Gl montiboinm also as a

distinct species. As a species this peculiar taxon cannot be overlooked in terms of NatureConservation.

Tsukada & Nishiyama ( 1980) have given a shert review of the subspecies of Graphium mdon

(C.&R. Felder, 1864), with which ] do agree, but milon C. &R. Felder, 1864 is a nomen

nudum as Bryk (1930) had already stated. The oldest valid name fbr this taxon is Tnilbn C, &R, Felder, 1865. In the current definition. of the species, mdon C.&R, Felder, 1865,anthedon C. & R. Felder, 1864, sulaense Lathy, 1899, dodingense Rothschild, 1896, cntdumRothschild, 1898 and halesus Fruhstorfer, 1907 are subspecies ofthe same species, fbr whichthe valid name therefbre becomes anthedon C.&R, Felder, 1864. Below I summarize thesubspecific combinations of this species with their ranges.



The LepidopterologicalSociety ofJapan

Table I.

Notes on Some Papilionidae from Indonesia '

A historical view of the eariier treatment of the three suniatrana

Hagen (1894) under Papiha.

taxa clegcribed by

221

Hagen, 1894

Rothschild, 1895

Jordan, l908-1909

Bryk, L930

Ford, 1944

Munroe, 1961

Igarashi, 1979

Tsukada & Nishiyama,1980

D'Abrera, 1982

Hancock, 1983

Miller, 1987

Bridges, 1988

p. 20Popilio hewitsonii

Westwood, var,

sumatrana

Papiilo slateri pe,sesNiceville (=sumatranaHagen)Pmptilo

slateri persesNiceville (=sumatranaHagen)Papido

slateri persesNic6ville ( == sumatrana

Hagen)Paptilo

sp.

PapMo simeri Gray[incl.]C)-hasa

slaten'

penses NicevMe

Chilasa slateripenyes Niceville

(=sumatrana Hagen)

Chilasa slateripet:ses NicEville

Chilasa slateri(Gray) [incl.]

Popifio sp.

Pmpifio slateri

perses NicevMe

(=sumatrana Hagen)

p. 21Papdio neptunus

Guerin-MEneville, var,

sumatrana

Papilio neptunus

ab. sumatranus Hagen

Papilio neptunus

sumatranus Hagen

Papillo neptunus

sumatranus Hagen

Atrophaneura sp.

Attzlphaneuraneptunus [incl.1Pachtlopta sp,

Losaria neptunus

sumatrana Hagen[S. E. Sumatra]sthorangitana as a new

subspcies

[N. E. Sumatra]Atmphaneuraneptunus sumatrana

Hagen[N, Sumatra]

Atrophaneuraneptunus (Guerin-Meneville) [incl,]Pachliopta (Losaria)neptunus (Guerin-Meneville)

Atrophaneura

(Losan'a) neptunus

sumatranus Hagen

p. 28Papillo coloanthus

Westwood, var,

sumatrana

Popido cloanthus

sumatranus Hagen

Papido eloanthus

sumauana Hagen

Papiilo cloanthus

sumatrana Hagen

Graphium sp.

Graphium cloanthus

[incl.]Grqphium cloanthus

sumatranus Hagen

Graphiuni cloanthus

sumatranus Hagen

Graphium cloanthus

sumatranus Hagen

Craphium (Graphium)sumatranum (Hagen)as new combination

Graphium (Graphium)sp.

Grophiuin eloanthus

sumatrana Hagen

(homonym in need of

a replacement.

Hancock: goodspecies)

thaphium antkedon anthedon (C. & R. Felder, 1864)

Papillo anthedon C.&R. Felder, 1864, Plerh. iooL-both GesL va7en 14: 304. Ceram, AmbQn (TL), Saparua.

thaphium anthedon milon (C, & R. Felder, 1865), stat. nov.

Papilio milon C.&R. Felder, 1864, Vbrh zooZ-bot Ges. P7ien 14: 304, nom, nudum.

Papillo mtibn C.&R. Felder, 186S, Reise Ost li)Jagatte Novara (Zool,) 2 (Abt, 2): 62, n.48. Sulawesi

(TL), Talaud, Peleng, Butung.




222 J, J. M. MooNEN

.t"/igI:ls.aj,tzxl'ps't'#

2

:

xgkgitpa

Fig 1. Graphium enceladds (Beisduval). 9, Bolaang Mongondou, 1920. Coll. v. d. Bergh.

(A: rocto, B: verso),

Figs2-3. Papillopolytes aicindorOberthUr fromN.Sulawesi. 2. cl,Gorontalo, 1913. 3. \, Gorontalo, 1913. (A: recto, B: verso).

Figs4-7. Papillo aiphenor pervensus Rothschild from N. Sulawesi and Sangihe I. 4. ci,,

Sangir I,, 1915, 5. ,ja, Minahassa, 1912. 6. 4, Sangir I., 1915 7. 9, Minahassa, 1912. (A: recto, B: verso).

thaphium anthedon sulaense (Lathy, 1899), stat. nov.

PapWo sarpedon sulaensis Lathy, 1899, EntomoiQgist 32: 149. Sula Arch. (Taliabu, Mangoli (TL), Sanana).



The LepidopterologicalSoclety ofJapan

Notes on Some Papihonidae from lndonesia 223

tt

I

isi,i5

4

1

T

5i

'71

'




224 J. J, M. MooNEN

thaphium anthedon dodingense (Rothschild, 1896), stat. nov.

Paptho sarpedbn dodingensis Rothschild, 1896, IVOvit zooL 3: 323, Halmahera (TL), Bacan.

thaphizam anthedon crudum (Rothschild, 1898), stat. noy.

Papilib sarpedon cnidus Rothschild, 189g, IVbvit, zooL 5: 416. 0bi (TL).

thaphium anthedon haldsus (Fruhstorfer, 1907), stat. noy.

Papitlo sarpeclon halesids Fruhstorfer, 1907, Ent ZL 21: 183. Buru (TL).

thaphium weiskei Ribbe, 1900 found in Java

From a Dutch tourist who collected a few butterfiies I obtained ,two males of Graphiumweiskei which were fbund on alewer hill at Rembang (E. Java) on 5. Xl. 1990. Isuppose

that these are incidentally introduced specimens, or perhaps there is a butterfly farm in theneighbourhood.

The female of thmphium encelades (Boisduyal, 1836)

Studied material. 1 \, N. Celebes, Botaang Mongondou, 1920, ex coll. v. d. Bergh, coll.ZMA,

Several authors (Rothschild, 1895; Jordan, 1909; Martin, 1915; Haugum, et al,, 1980;

Tsukada&Nishiyama, 1980; D'Abrer4 1982) mentioned that the female of Graphiumencelades (Boisduval) is unknown, The female rernained unknown until Detani (1983) and

no figure has yet been published. Martin (1915) suggests that the fernale diflers only slightly

from the male. Detani (1983) reports that his very damaged specimens (2 din and 10 9 fromBenta, Peleng I,) are indistinguishable from the males of Sulawesi. The female in thecol]ection of the Zoological Museum of Amsterdam (Fig, 1) is indeed very like the males.

The brown colour extends along the veins inwards more so than in the males,

Manin (I915) remarks that he could not see any resemblance to poisonous models of Emploeaor other Danaidae, but Detani (1983) writes:"At first glance they resemble the femaleEuploea conj7gurata, but if they avoid being netted, their flight characteristics return to thatof the 6raphium, and they fly off displaying great agility." I only know EuploeaconLfigurata (Felder) from the figure by D'Abrera (1982, p.221 as Euplbea euctemon

Hewitson) butIcan imagine that Detani (1983) is right, Superficially they are alike, and

because oftheir similar flight behaviour it will be diMcult to see the difference in their ownhabitat.

Ilapilib tlemoleus Linnaeus, 1758 on Java

Kato (1989) mentioned the first recent Papillo demoletLs Linnaeus, 1758 from Java, the fifthspecimen after the earlier records (Moonen, 1991). Therefbre it was a surprise fbr me to see

one R demoleus on the wing in Jakarta, Gondangdia, on l5. VII. I996, I also found therea Papillo caterpillar on a little (]7tnts tree in the garden of the guesthouse, where we stayed.

From the phote I could identify it as a caterpillar ofR demoleus but with no other reference

than the plates ofIgarashi (1979, pl. 121). So,Iam not very sure about the determinatien,Later, on 24. VII. 1996, I saw two specimens in Surabaya, Ngagel Jaya, of which I managed




Notes on Some Papilionidae from Indonesia 225

te collect one female. This specimen is without any doubt jPL ctemoleiLs madyanus Wallace,1865, Because efthe few earlier records ofthis spocies in JavaIhad not expected these new

sightings at all, but asIhave seen three specimens and perhapsacaterpillar in the short timethat I was in Java, I can conclude that nowadays the introduction of this species has beenC`successfu1".

At the time this has already been confirmed by the otfer of R ctemoleus fromJava by an Australian dealer, from whom I received three males from East Java, respectivelyfrom Mt Wilis (26, VI, 1996), Mt Guniter (1, X. 1996) and Mt Argopuro (18. X. 1996).These males belong to ssp, thanius Fruhstorfer, 1908.

On the identity of PtzpitiO polytes aipheias Jordan, 1909 from N. Sulawesi=:syn. nov. of

Ripifib aiphenor perversas Rothschild, 1895

Studied material. R aiphenor perverstLs : coll. ZMA (Talaud ; Sangir; N. Celebes : Mina-hassa); R aiphenor polycritos: cQll. G. ten Broek, coll, J. Moonen (Peleng); R polytesaicindor : coll. ZMA, coll. G. ten Broek &coll, J. Moonen (Celebes, localities, see Fig. 8).

Before Fruhstorfer (1902) described his female Pt]pillo polytes ab, aipheias from Menado("female, which is alike aiphenor ? 9 from the Philippines"), in fact this form was alreadymentioned from Sulawosi as R aiphenor by ObemhUr (1879, p. 48) and by Semper (1892, p,277).

OberthUr (1879, p. 48) also mentioned R ledebouria from Sulawesi, of which Rothschild

(l895) judged that it concemed a "loc.

err,", a wrong locality, for he knew ledebouria as thePhilippine subspecies, but possibly it was also the taxon concerned,

Fruhstorfer (]902) mentioned the oocurrence of R polytes ab, aipheios in North Sulawesi butnot ofR polytes aloindbr OberthUr, 1879. Rothschild (1895) and Jordan (1909) excluded N.Sulawesi from the range of aicindbr. Mest authors have fo11owed Rothschild (1895) and

Jordan (1909) in that respect. The latter discussed the eccurrenee ofab. aipheias Fruhstorfer,

1902 in North Sulawesi, and pointed out that alpheias belongs to his group 2 of Paptilib

polytes, which corresponds to the type description of Fruhstorfer.

Jordan (I909) raised the aberration aipheios of Fruhstorfer to a subspecific level and so made

the name valid : Paptilo polytes aiphei(rs Jerdan, 1909.

From North Sulawesi, Martin (1915) knew aiphei(rs Fruhstorfer ({jZ dii & \\) but alsomales of aicindor, However from this sympatric occurrence he did not conclude that there

are two species in Northern Su]awesi instead ofone, as he did with regard to Graphium mitbn

and (1 monticolvm. Not until l971 did Hiura & Alagar split the species Papi2lo polytes intotwo species : R polytes Linnaeus and R aiphenor Cramer (Jordan's group 1 and group 2respectively), That makes the situation in Northern Sulavyesi clear. It is reached from thesouth by R palytes aicinclor and from the north by R aiphenor. Tsukada&Nishiyama

(1980, pl. 114, fig. S) figured as R polytes aipheias a male of aleindor from Doluduo, N.Sulawesi, which is the first recent confirmation of the occurrence of aicindor in NonhernSulawesi.

In the collection of the Zoological Museum of Amsterdam there are short series of bothspecies from N. Sulawesi (Figs 2-7),

In Talaud and Sangihe PapiZiO aiphenor pervensus Rothschild, 1895 oocurs, I cannot see inthese series any differences between aipheios and perversus (Figs 4-7) although Jordan (1909)mentioned Some, so aipheicrs has to be treated as a synonym of perversus (syn. noy.).




226

Fig. 8.

J. J. M. MooNEN

.i.'M'x,

,

. ･ "'Ia]""R

)," ,i Nsangthc..,i / " '"'t t ' '"i.rfsiaue ss.t

i el

2Zeseia:iar

"

Range of Papitio polytes aicindor OberthUr (e) and R alphenor sspp. in Sulawesi and

adjacent islands (-.-･- : P. a. pervensus Rothschild, ---- : R a. polycritos Fruhstor-

fer). 1. Sangir; 2, Menado; 3, Mt Tanggari; 4, Bolaang Mongondou; 5, Doluduo

(Tsukada&Nishiyama, 1980) ; 6. Gorentalo; 7. Tanah Mateh Pa' ; 8. Palu, Biromar-

u; 9. Parigi; 10, Poso; 11, Tentena; 12. road Luwuk-Biak-Poh; I3. Soroako; 14.PaLopo;15. Belalang or Belalango, 62km N, of Majene;16, Watampone;l7,Camba; ]8, Bantimurung; 19. Makassar (=Ujung Pandang) ; 20. MaLing Goa; 21.Bonthain (=Bentaeng) ; 22, Seleier (=Selajar) ; 23. Butung (Bryk, 1930).

Paptilo aiphenor polycritas Fruhstorfer, 1901 was described from the Sula Islands and also

occurs in Peleng Island (=aiphenor Fruhstorfer, 1902 from Bankai (=Peleng)). The map

(Fig. 8) shows the range of both PapiZlo polytes and R aiphenor in this region. Because of

the label of R aiphenor perversus in the Zoological Museum of Amsterdam on wbich iswritten only

"Minahassa", the range on the map contains the whole Minahasa.

One male of PapiZlo polytes aleinclor in the collection of the Zoological Museum o{

Amsterdam suggests the occurrence in Sangihe. This has yet to be confirmed. Only Bryk

(1930) mentioned the occurrence of Pql)illo polytes aicindor in Butung (Buton),

"Despite

the help of the map-room of the Institute for the Tropics in Amsterdam we could not

locate Tanah Mateh, Thq still papered specimens in the Zoological Museum of Amsterdam

are labeled : Tanah Mateh Pa, 6,OOO ft, ..,..., 1936. We presume that Pa is an abbreviation

ofPalu. Therefore we placed it near Palu.



The 　Lepidopterologioal 　Sooiety 　of 　Japan

Notes　on 　Some 　Papilionidae　from　Indonesia 227

Refe『ences

Bridges，　 C．　A ．，1988．　Catalogue　 q！ Papilionidae （fi　Pieridae （Lep，； Rhop ．）． 723　pp，　 C．　A ．　Brid呂es，　　　Urbana．Bryk

，　F．

，1930．　Papilionidae　IL　In　Strand

，　E．（Ed ．）Lepid．　 Cat．37 ： 59−509．

D’Abrera，　B．，1982．β観従〜〜物 ∫ qズ漉θ Orienごα1　Region　1 ： i．xxi ，1．．244．　 HiU　House，　Victoria．Detani，　H ，，1983，　 Butter且ies　or 　Peleng　Island．　∬w α∫θ （1）： 6−60，　pls　63−72．Felder，　 C ．＆ R．　 Felder，1864，　 Species　 Lepidopterorum 　hucusque　descriptae　vel　 iconihus　 expressae 　in

　　　seriem 　systelnaticum 　digestae．　 Pars　Prima ： Papilionidae．　阨〃z．　zool．一わoム Ges．脆 η 14： 289−378．

　　　　　　＆　　　　　」 865．　Rhopalocera ．　ReiSe　derδ、sterreichtSchen 　Fregatte‘‘八りvara

’卩um 伽 Erde

　　　in　I85Z　1858，／859　unter 　den　Befehlen　Commodore β．　voη 贋〜llerstorf− Urbair．（Zoo ⊥．）2 （Abt．2）；

　　　1−136 （」跚．）； 137−378 （D ．）Fruhstorfer，　H ．，1902．　 Neuo 加 do −australische 　Lepidoptera．　Dt．　 ent ．　Z ．傭 14 ： 334−350．

Hagen，　B，，1894．　Verzeichniss　der　von 　mir 　auf 　Sumatra　gelhngenen　Rhopaloceren．　Dt．　en 　t．　Z 　lriS　7 ： 1−

　　　41，pl、1．

Haugum ，亅．，　Ebner，亅．＆ T．　Racheli，1980．　The　Papilionidae　of 　Celebes（Sulawesi）．　 An　annotated 　list．

　　　ム〔lpi吻 tera （｝roup 　qズ 196＆　 Suppl．9． 21pp 、　 Vej　le，　Denmark ．Hiura，1．＆ R ，　E．　Alagar，197L　Studies　Qn 　the　Ph｛lippine　butternies　chieHy 　col且 ted　by　the　co −opcrative

　　　survey 　by　the　Osaka 　Museum 　of 　Natural　History　and 　the　National　Museum 　of 　the　Philippines，1969，

　　　Part　I ； Papilionidae．　BulL　Osaka　Mus ．　nat ．1九鉱 24 ； 29−44，　pls　1−4．Igarashi，　S，，1979、　PapffiPnidae　and 　their θα吻 Stages．　2vols．　 Kodansha，　Tokyo．（In　Japanese）．Jordan，　K ．，1908−1910．　Pqpitio　to　A 厂mandia ．　’n 　Seitz，　A ．（Ed ．）（｝一Schmetterlinge　der　Erde 　9 ； H −

　　　109，pls　1　49．Kato ，　S．，1989．　Notes　on 　Papili∂ demoleus　L．　collocted 　in　Java，　Indonesia （Lepidoptera ，　Papilionidae）．

　　　1ン∂　G α 40 ：　189一正91．Martin

，　L ．

，1915．　 Die　Tagfalter　der　lnsel　Celebes．　 D 乙 θ厩 Zl915 ： 50−90，

Moonen ，」．　J．　M ，，1991．　 Papitio　demoleus　L ．　in　Java（Lepidoptera；Papilionidae）．　 Tyδ Ga 　42 ； 93−94．OberthUr，　C．，1879．　 Cata且ogue 　raisonn6 　des　Papilionidae　de　la　collection 　de　Ch ．　OberthUr 　ti　RenIles．　　　ノ　　　Etzid．　 en　t．4 ： xviii ，19−117，40r 　6　pls．

Rothschild，　W ．，1895．　 A 　revision 　of 　the　Papili∂s　 of 　the　EasteTn　Hemisphere，　exclusive 　 of 　Africa．／＞∂vit．

　　　zooL 　2 ： 167−463，　pl．4．SchrOder，　H ．，1976．　N

．eue 　Lepidoptera　von 　den　Philippines．　En 　t．　Z 　Frankfurt　aL ルt．86： 265−270．

Semper，　C ．　G ．，1886−1892，　 Die 　Schmetterlinge　der　philippinischen　Inseln．　 Beitrag乙ur 　indo−malayischen

　　　Lepidopteren −Fauna ，　 1．　Die　Tagfalter．　加 Semper，　C ．　G ．，　R 曲 θη 枷 Archipet　der　Phitippinen（2）　　　5． Wiesbaden．Tsukada ，　E ．＆ Y ．　Nishiyama ，1980，　 Papilionidae．　∬n 　Tsukada ，　E （Ed ．），8 襯 θ脚 ∫ qプ the　South　East

　　　、4sian　Islands　1．　459　pp．（166　pls〕．　Plapac　Co．　Ltd．，　Tokyo．（ln　Japanese）．

　　　　　　　＆　　　　　　，1982 （English　Edn ）．　Papilionidae．　加 Tsukad自，　E．（Ed．），βμπθ祕 5　q〆　the

　　　South　East　Asian　IStands　1．　459　pp．（166　pls）．　Plapac　Co ．　Ltd．，　Tokyo ．

摘要

インドネシアのアゲハチョウ科の新知見（J．J．　M ．　Moonen ）

インドネシアのアゲハチョウ科の数種について新知見を提出した．

Hagen （1894）は Papitio　 hewitsonii，　 PapiliO 耀 ρ∫槻認，　 Papiiio　 cloanthus のそれぞれについて var ．

sumatrana を記載した．それらは今日，異なる属の種グループ名として扱われているが，もちろん

一次

ホモニムであるので，内 2 つは無効とされねばならない．これらは同じ日付で公表されているため

（この場合では同じ著作），最初の改訂者の行為として Papilio　 ctoanthus 　var ．　sumatrana 　Hagen を有効な

ものと認め，残る 2 つの sumatrana を無効とすることで，学名の変更を最小限なものとした．この結

果，今目独立種とされる Graphium　sum αtranum 　Hagen （＝ Papilie　cloanthus 　var ．　sumatrana ）の学名は

変更しない．Papitio　 neptunus 　 sumatrana は，模式産地を検討したところ Losaria　 neptunus 　 sthoran 一

N 工工一Eleotronio 　Library 　



The 　Lepidopterologioal 　Sooiety 　of 　Japan

228 J．J．　M 　 MoONEN

gitana　Tsukada ＆ Nishiyama，1980の senior 　synonym であることが判明したが，　Papilio　neptUnus 　var．

sumatrana は無効となるので，　 neptunUS のこの亜種名には引き続き sthorangitana が有効となる．ただ

し，本種は Pachiiopta に属するので，所属を変更した．なお，　Papilio　hewitsonti・var ．　sum α trana は，今日

Paptiio　slateri 　perses　Nic6ville，1894のシノニムとされているので，ホモニムの議論とは関係なく perses

Nic6villeが有効名として使用される．

Papilio　miton 　C ．＆ R ．　Felder，1864 は記載を伴わない不適格名で，このタクソンには Papilio　milon 　C ．＆

R ．Felder，1865が適格であるが，種レベルでは Papitio　 anthedon 　C ．＆ R．　Felder，1864が先行するので，

現行の亜種区分に従えぱ，セラムやアンボンのものが原名亜種 Graphium　 anthedon 　 anthedon となり，スラウェシの亜種が Canthedon 　milon （C．＆ Felder，1865〕，スラ諸島が Ganthedon 　 sulaense （Lathy ），

ハルマヘラが G．anthedon 　dodingense（Rothschild），オビ島が Ganthedon 　crudum （Rothschild），ブル

島が G．anthedon 　haleStdS（Fruhstorfer）となる．なお，

（；raphium 　sarpedon の亜種とされることのある

monticolum （Fruhs．　torfer）は，別種として扱うのが望ましいと考える．そうすることで，自然保．護の観

点からも montieolum が見落とされなくなろう．

Graphium　 weiSkei 　 Ribbe の ♂ 2 頭が lggo 年 11 月にジャワで得られているが，偶然持ち込まれたか近

くにバタフライファー

ムがあるのかも知れない．

Graphium　encelades （Boisduval）の ♀は極めて少ないが，古くスラウェシで得られた標本を検した．

Fig．1 に図示した通り，♂ とはほとんど差異がない．

ジャワの Papitio　 demoleus　Linnaeus は数える程しか記録がなかったが，1996 年 7月，ジャカルタとス

ラバヤで 3頭の成虫を観察し，同種と思、われる幼虫をミカンの小木で見つけた．スラバヤで採集した 1

♀は亜種 malayanus 　Wallaceであった．本種はジャワに定着したと考えられる．また，束ジャワ産の 3

♂ をオーストラリアの業者から得たが，これらは亜種肋 αη跏∫ Fruhstorferであった．

Papilio　po！ytes　ab ．　alphelOs 　Fruhstorfer，1902 は，フィリピンの aiphenor の ♀に似たものとして北スラ

ウェシ，ミーナハーサ半島のメナドより記載され，後に Jordan （1909）により：亜種に昇格されたため

P4卿 o　 po！ytes　 aipheios 　 Jordan，1909として知られる．しかし，　 Martin （1915）は北スラウェシに

Papilio　 Po！ytes　 atcindor 　 OberthUrも分布するとした．北スラウェシの aicindor の標本は，塚田・西山

（1980）にもドルドゥオ産の ♂ が図示され，最近での最初の確実な記録となっている．P．　 poむytesが 2種

に分割されたのはようやく1971 年になってからであり，北スラウェシには P． po！ytes　 α〜伽跏厂と P．alphenor が産することとなった．しかし，スラウェシの北方，タラウド島やサンギへ島には P¢ 躍 o　 al−

phenor　perversus　Rothschild， 1895 が産し，北スラウェシのメナドから書かれた alpheios はこれと区別できないので，perversusのシノニムとした．また，

スラ諸島から記載された P．　 aiphenor の別の亜種，P．alphenor 　polycritos　 Fruhstorherはスラウェシ東部のペレン島まで分布する、スラウェシとその周辺のこれら 2 種の分布図を Fig．8 にまとめたが，サンギへ島の α1伽跏厂はアムステルダムの博物館にあ

る 1 ♂ のみであり．確認が必要である．また，スラウェシ東南部のブトゥン島の aicindor の記録は

Bryk 〔1930）が知られるのみである．

［文責：吉本　浩］

（Accepted　February　 l6，1998）

Published　by　the 　Lepidopterological　Society　of 　Japan，5−20

，Motoyokoyama 　2，　Hachioji，　Tokyo，192−0063　Japan

N 工工一Eleotronio 　Library 　

notes papilionidae (lepidoptera) from

Documents