nosql @ qcon sp

noSQL

quarta-feira, 8 de setembro de 2010

. hype


história...


• Hierarchical (IMS): late 1960’s and 1970’s • Directed graph (CODASYL): 1970’s • Relational: 1970’s and early 1980’s • Entity-Relationship: 1970’s • Extended Relational: 1980’s • Semantic: late 1970’s and 1980’s• Object-oriented: late 1980’s and early 1990’s • Object-relational: late 1980’s and early 1990’s • Semi-structured (XML): late 1990’s to late 2000’s• The next big thing: ???

ref: What Goes Around Comes Around por Michael Stonebraker e Joey Hellerstein

modelos


next big thing?


definição...


abaixo ao banco de

dados relacional!


abaixo ao banco de dados relacional!

como bala de prata!


momento histórico...


resolver problemas específicos


quais problemas?


Architectural Anti PatternsNotes on Data Distribution and Handling Failures


Required Listening: Frank Zappa - One size fits all


Anti Patterns

• Evolution from SQL Anti Patterns (NoSQL:br May 2010)• More than just RDBMS• Large volumes of data• Distribution• Architecture• Research on other tools• Message Queues, DHT, Job Schedulers, NoSQL• Indexing, Map/Reduce


RDBMS Anti Patterns Not all things fit on a relational database, single ou distributed

• The eternal table-as-a-tree • Dynamic table creation• Table as cache • Table as queue • Table as log file• Stoned Procedures• Row Alignment• Extreme JOINs• Your scheme must be printed in an A3 sheet.• Your ORM issue full queries for Dataset iterations


Doing it wrong, Junior !


The eternal treeProblem: Most threaded discussion example uses something like a table which contains all threads and answers, relating to each other by an id. Usually the developer will come up with his own binary-tree version to manage this mess.

id - parent_id -author - text1 - 0 - gleicon - hello world2 - 1 - elvis - shout !

Alternative: Document storage:{ thread_id:1, title: 'the meeting', author: 'gleicon', replies:[ { 'author': elvis, text:'shout', replies:[{...}] } ]}


Dynamic table creationProblem: To avoid huge tables, one must come with a "dynamic schema". For example, lets think about a document management company, which is adding new facilities over the country. For each storage facility, a new table is created:

item_id - row - column - stuff1 - 10 - 20 - cat food2 - 12 - 32 - trout

Now you have to come up with "dynamic queries", which will probably query a "central storage" table and issue a huge join to check if you have enough cat food over the country.

Alternatives: - Document storage, modeling a facility as a document- Key/Value, modeling each facility as a SET


Table as cacheProblem: Complex queries demand that a result be stored in a separated table, so it can be queried quickly. Worst than views

Alternatives: - Really ?

- Memcached

- Redis + AOF + EXPIRE

- De-normalization


Table as queueProblem: A table which holds messages to be completed. Worse, they must be ordered bytime of creation.

Corolary: Job Scheduler table

Alternatives: - RestMQ, Resque

- Any other message broker

- Redis (LISTS - LPUSH + RPOP)

- Use the right tool


Table as log fileProblem: A table in which data gets written as a log file. From time to time it needs to be purged. Truncating this table once a day usually is the first task assigned to new DBAs.

Alternative:

- MongoDB capped collection

- Redis, and RRD pattern

- RIAK


Stoned proceduresProblem: Stored procedures hold most of your applications logic. Also, some triggers are used to - well - trigger important data events.

SP and triggers has the magic property of vanishing of our memories and being impossible to keep versioned.

Alternative: - Now be careful so you dont use map/reduce as modern stoned procedures. Unfit for real time search/processing

- Use your preferred language for business stuff, and let event handling to pub/sub or message queues.


Row AlignmentProblem: Extra rows are created but not used, just in case. Usually they are named as a1, a2, a3, a4 and called padding.

There's good will behind that, specially when version 1 of the software needed an extra column in a 150M lines database and it took 2 days to run an ALTER TABLE. But that's no excuse.

Alternative:

- Quit being cheap. Quit feeling 'hacker' about padding

- Document based databases as MongoDB and CouchDB, has no schema. New atributes are local to the document and can be added easily.


Extreme JOINsProblem: Business stuff modeled as tables. Table inheritance (Product -> SubProduct_A). To find the complete data for a user plan, one must issue gigantic queries with lots of JOINs.

Alternative:

- Document storage, as MongoDB might help having important information together.

- De-normalization

- Serialized objects


Your scheme fits in an A3 sheetProblem: Huge data schemes are difficult to manage. Extreme specialization creates tables which converges to key/value model. The normal form get priority over common sense.

Product_A Product_Bid - desc id - desc

Alternatives: - De-normalization- Another scheme ? - Document store for flattening model- Key/Value- See 'Extreme JOINs'


Your ORM ...Problem: Your ORM issue full queries for dataset iterations, your ORM maps and creates tables which mimics your classes, even the inheritance, and the performance is bad because the queries are huge, etc, etc

Alternative:

- Apart from denormalization and good old common sense, ORMs are trying to bridge two things with distinct impedance.

- There is nothing to relational models which maps cleanly to classes and objects. Not even the basic unit which is the domain(set) of each column. Black Magic ?


No silver bullet

- Think about data handling and your system architecture

- Think outside the norm

- De-normalize

- Simplify

- Know stuff (Message queues, NoSQL, DHT)


Cycle of changes - Product A

1.There was the database model2.Then, the cache was needed. Performance was no good.3.Cache key: query, value: resultset4.High or inexistent expiration time [w00t]

(Now there's a turning point. Data didn't need to change often. Denormalization was a given with cache)

5. The cache needs to be warmed or the app wont work.6. Key/Value storage was a natural choice. No data on MySQL anymore.


Cycle of changes - Product B

1.Postgres DB storing crawler results.2.There was a counter in each row, and updating this counter

caused contention errors.3.Memcache for reads. Performance is better.4.First MongoDB test, no more deadlocks from counter update.5.Data model was simplified, the entire crawled doc was

stored.


Stuff to think about

Think if the data you use aren't de-normalized somewhere (cached)

Most of the anti-patterns signals that there are architectural issues instead of only database issues.

The NoSQL route (or at least a partial NoSQL route) may simplify it.

Are you dependent on cache ? Does your application fails when there is no cache ? Does it just slows down ?

Think about the way to put and to get back your data from the database (be it SQL or NoSQL).


arquiteturaquarta-feira, 8 de setembro de 2010

armazenamento de dados NÃO

tem sido [a muito tempo]

considerado parte de

arquitetura


cada escolha uma

renúncia


padrões


how-to


acid


(quarta-feira, 8 de setembro de 2010

existe nosqlacid


)quarta-feira, 8 de setembro de 2010

ref: The CAP Theorem por Seth Gilbert & Nancy Lynch

CAP


CAP

onsistencyvailabilityartition Tolerance


BASE

ref: BASE: an Acid Alternative por Dan Pritchettquarta-feira, 8 de setembro de 2010

BASE

asicallyvailableoft Stateeventually Consistent


Eventually Consistency

ref: Eventually Consistent por Werner Vogelsquarta-feira, 8 de setembro de 2010

eventual em português: pode ou não ocorrer

eventual em inglês: irá ocorrer em algum

momento


Consitência em Momento

Indeterminado

@mdedianaquarta-feira, 8 de setembro de 2010

consistência

W+R > N


durabilidade

ref: The End of an Architectural Era por Michael Stonebraker & al.quarta-feira, 8 de setembro de 2010

★ latência★ performance★ particionamento★ distribuição★ replicação

ainda tem...


lembre-se

vc não está criando uma solução de escala

intergaláctica com tolerância a falhas aleatórias

entre datacenters espalhados em diversas

localizações geográficas e outras dimensões


sacou a importância

da arquitetura?


com tantas definições...com tantos conceitos...com tantos tradeoffs...

com tantos....


como o nosql se tornou tão

sexy e popular?


apesar de tudo....

é fácil usar!quarta-feira, 8 de setembro de 2010

persitência poliglota


Perguntas?


@porcelli

linkedin.com/in/alexandreporcelli

porcelli.com.br

Obrigado

github.com/porcelli

@gleicon

linkedin.com/in/gleicon

zenmachine.wordpress.com

github.com/gleicon


http://twitter.com/porcelli


http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandreporcelli




mailto:[email protected]










nosql @ qcon sp

Technology