northern california pbis symposium november 18, 2013

42
Using PBIS Assessment to Create School and District PBIS Evaluation Plans Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013 Are we doing what we said we would do?

Upload: melinda-knight

Post on 24-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Using PBIS Assessment to Create School and District

PBIS Evaluation Plans

Northern California PBIS SymposiumNovember 18, 2013

Are we doing what we said we would do?

Page 2: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Agenda

Overview of available surveys/tools on the PBIS Assessment website

Developing an Evaluation Action PlanDecisions on which tools to chooseDecisions on timelines

Assessment Example Plans

Developing Evaluation Reports

Questions/Comments

Page 3: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Acknowledgments

School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Implementers' Blueprint and Self-Assessment

Sugai, G., Horner, R.H., Algozzine, R., et.al. (2010).

Evaluation Blueprint for School-Wide Positive Behavior Interventions & Support

Algozzine, R., Horner, R.H, Sugai, G., et.al. (2010).

Fidelity Measures to Improve Implementation of Positive Behavioral Support

Tobin, T. J., Vincent, C. G., Horner, R. H., Rossetto Dickey, C., & May, S. A. (2012).

Page 4: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

PBIS Evaluation Blueprint

“A hallmark of School-wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS) is a commitment to formal evaluation.”

“Evaluation is the process of collecting and using information for decision making.

Page 5: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Foundations

Evaluation is the process of gathering data toAnswer questionsMake decisions

Define the core questions/decisions, before selecting measures.

Provide an adequate context for interpreting the data.

Effective evaluation is cyclical (repeated)Use the evaluation process for improvement

Page 6: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Evaluation Cycle

Core Questions

Evaluation Plan

Data Collection

Evaluation Report

Page 7: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Core Evaluation QuestionsContext

What are/were the goals and objectives for SWPBIS implementation? (state/district capacity; school adoption; student outcomes)

Who delivered the training and technical assistance for SWPBIS implementation?

InputWhat professional development events were part of SWPBIS implementation support?

Was projected level of TA capacity provided (training/coaching)?

Who received the professional development (schools/ cohorts)?

Page 8: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Core Evaluation QuestionsFidelity

To what extent was Tier I SWPBIS implemented with fidelity ?

To what extent were Tier II and Tier III SWPBIS implemented with fidelity?

To what extent is the Leadership Team establishing core functions?

Page 9: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Leadership Team

Active Coordination

FundingVisibility Political

Support

Training Coaching Evaluation

Local School/District Teams/Demonstrations

BehavioralExpertise

Policy

Sugai et al., www.pbis.org

Page 10: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Core Evaluation QuestionsImpact

To what extent is SWPBIS associated with changes in student behavioral outcomes?

To what extent is SWPBIS associated with changes in academic performance, and dropout rates?

To what extent is district/state capacity established? (local training, coaching, evaluation, behavioral expertise)

To what extent is leadership and policy structure established?

Page 11: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Core Evaluation Questions

Replication, Sustainability, and ImprovementTo what extent do Fidelity and Impact outcomes sustain across time?

To what extent does initial SWPBIS implementation affect Implementation with later cohorts?

To what extent did SWPBIS implementation change educational/behavioral capacity/policy?

To what extent did SWPBIS implementation affect systemic educational practice?

Page 12: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Evaluation Questions

FidelityTo what extent was SWPBS implemented as designed?

To what extent was SWPBS implemented with fidelity?

“Are we doing what we said we would do?”

Page 13: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

To What Extent Can

PBIS Applications.org

PBIS Assessment

PBIS Evaluation

Help us answer the question:“Are we doing what we said we would do?”

Page 14: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Current Tools in PBIS Assessment

Research Tool

Annual Assessment

Tool

Progress Monitoring

Tool

UniversalSystem

School-wide Evaluation Tool

(SET)

Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ)

Early Childhood BoQ (ECBoQ)

PBIS Self-Assessment Survey (SAS)

Team Implementation

Checklist (TIC)

Secondary &TertiarySystems

Benchmarks of Advanced Tiers (BAT)

PBIS Self-Assessment Survey (SAS)

Monitoring Advanced Tiers

Tool (MATT)

Outcome Measures: School Safety Survey

Page 15: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Current Tools in PBIS Assessment

Research Tool

Annual Assessment

Tool

Progress Monitoring

Tool

UniversalSystem

School-wide Evaluation Tool

(SET)

Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ)

Early Childhood BoQ (ECBoQ)

PBIS Self-Assessment Survey (SAS)

Team Implementation

Checklist (TIC)

Secondary &TertiarySystems

Individual Student School-wide Evaluation

Tool(ISSET)

Benchmarks of Advanced Tiers (BAT)

PBIS Self-Assessment Survey (SAS)

Monitoring Advanced Tiers

Tool (MATT)

Outcome Measures: School Safety Survey

Page 16: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

www.pbisapps.org

A Tour of

at

Page 17: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Evaluation Action PlanningDecisions:

Evaluation ToolsWhich tools answer your district/schools’ evaluation questions?

Evaluation TimelineWhen/how often will you administer the tools?

Evaluation ReportingHow will you report outcomes to schools and to the District?How often will you report outcomes to schools and to the District?

Page 18: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Evaluation Action Planning

Decisions about Evaluation ToolsDoes your District/School need a research tool?

(SET/ISSET)

Which annual assessment tool(s) will you use?BoQ, SAS, SSS, BAT, ECBoQ

Which progressing monitoring tool(s) will you use?TIC, MATT

Does your District/School need to evaluate Tier I or Tier II & III implementation or all three?

Page 19: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Evaluation Action Planning

It is about…

CONTEXTYour settings => Your needs

Page 20: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Which Surveys Meet Your

District’s Needs?

Page 21: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Example District A

Evaluation Questions

What is our baseline, and what has been our progress through the year?

Are we improving on our implementation of PBIS?

How do our individual staff members rate our implementation?

Are our self-assessments consistent with data from outside evaluators?

Newly implementing, grant needing specific research data as well as fidelity of implementation data

Page 22: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

District A: Evaluation Plan

Measure Year One Year Two Year Three

Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring

SET X X X X

TIC X X X X X X X X X

Safety Survey X X X X

SAS X X X X

Page 23: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Example District B

Evaluation Questions

In what specific PBIS areas are we strong, and in which areas do we need more training?

Are we improving on our implementation of PBIS?

How do our staff members actually rate our PBIS implementation?

How is our implementation of Tiers II and III?

Implementing PBIS for three years, have been using the TIC/SET, and have been consistently over 80%.

Page 24: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

District B: Evaluation Plan

Measure Year One Year Two Year Three

Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring

BoQ X X X

SAS X X X

Safety Survey X X X

ATT X X X X X X X X X

Page 25: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Example District C

Evaluation Questions

Which schools are not meeting the SET benchmark?

In what specific PBIS areas are we strong, and in which areas do we need more training?

How can we tailor our training and evaluation to meet the needs of various schools?

Are we improving on our implementation of PBIS?

How do our individual staff members rate our implementation?

Implementing for five years, some schools are doing very well, but others are not making progress.

Page 26: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

District C: Evaluation Plan: Cohort 1

Measure Year One Year Two Year Three

Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring

SASSurvey X

SET X X X

Safety Survey X X X

TIC X X X X X X X X X

Schools still not performing well

Page 27: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

District C: Evaluation Plan: Cohort 2

Measure Year One Year Two Year Three

Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring

SASSurvey X

BoQ X X X

Safety Survey X X X

MATT X X X X X X X X X

Schools performing well

Page 28: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Example District D

Evaluation Questions

In what specific PBIS areas are we strong, and in which areas do we need more training?

In what academic areas are we strong, and in which areas do we need more improvement?

How can we tailor our training/evaluation to meet the needs of various schools?

How can we schedule our evaluations so that we are not overwhelming our schools?

The district wants to bring RtI Behavior and Academics together and create one evaluation plan.

Page 29: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Assessment Instrument

Fall (August/Sept/Oct)

Winter (Dec/Jan)

Spring(April/May) Purpose

Team Implementation Checklist (TIC)

X X X Fidelity of Implementation

Self-Assessment Survey

X Fidelity of implementation

School Safety Survey

X Outcomes related to Protective and Risk Factors

SET X Fidelity of Implementation

AIMsWeb X X XScreening

Progress Monitor

SAT10 X Summative Evaluation

DIBELS X X X Screening

Progress monitoring

Nieves Flores, 2012

Page 30: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Task: Developing Your Plan

Questions to Consider:Which surveys are your schools/districts currently using?Do they answer your evaluation questions:

Are we implementing SWPBIS with fidelity?Is there more information that we need?

Pbisapps.org > PBIS Assessment > Find Out More about Surveys

Do your surveys assess the Tiers you are implementing?Do you need a research tool?

Page 31: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Task: Developing Your Plan

Are you “topping out” of the surveys you are currently taking?

Do you need to customize your evaluation plan for different schools, or will one evaluation plan fit for all schools?

Do you want to assess all tiers of PBIS implementation?

Is your Evaluation Plan manageable for schools?

Page 32: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

District Evaluation Planning Template

Measure Year One Year Two Year Three

Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring

Page 33: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

SWPBIS School or District Evaluation Reports

Page 34: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Basic Contents of SWPBIS Evaluation Reports

From the PBIS Evaluation BlueprintContext

Input

Impact on SWPBIS Fidelity

Impact on Student Outcomes

Implications for the Future

Page 35: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Context

Define SWPBIS

Define goals of the specific project

Define stakeholders and evaluation questions

Page 36: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Input

Who received what support and from whom?Leadership team

Local Capacity Building Training, Coaching, Behavioral Expertise, and Evaluation

School teams

Page 37: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Impact on SWPBIS Fidelity

Leadership TeamSWPBIS District Leadership Team Self-Assessment

Capacity DevelopmentNumber of trainers/coaches available to support school teams/districtsBehavioral expertise available to support Tier II and Tier III implementationEvaluation capacity

School TeamsTier I Implementation (TIC, BoQ, SET, SAS)

Collectively and/or by training cohortTier II / Tier III Implementation (MATT, BAT, ISSET)

Collectively and/or by training cohort

Page 38: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Impact on Student Outcomes

Behavioral OutcomesOffice Discipline ReferralsSuspension/ExpulsionAttendanceDrop Out/GraduationDisproportionality in ODR and suspension/expulsion

Academic outcomesCurriculum Based Measures

Oral Reading Fluency, Dibels, AimsWebStandardized Measures

State and NationalMath, reading, writing assessments

Page 39: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Impact and Future Directions

Advances to datePlans for next three yearsAreas in need of adaptation

Narrowing of evaluation questions and concerns

Page 40: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Sharing Evaluation Reports

State and District examples at PBIS.orgSend in your district examples, so we can all learn!

Page 41: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Support and Resources

Portal Support SectionSearch FunctionCommunity ForumChat with us online

Account Questions:[email protected]

Technical Assistance Questions:

[email protected]

New phone number1-855-455-8194

Page 42: Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Questions & Answers

When you leave the webinar, please complete the survey.

THANK YOU!