north american profile: partnership across borders
DESCRIPTION
North American Profile: Partnership across borders. Sharon Shin, Metadata Coordinator, Federal Geographic Data Committee Raphael Sussman; Manager, Lands Information Ontario. What is the NAP. Community profile of ISO 19115 Geospatial Information – Metadata - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
North American North American Profile: Profile:
Partnership across borders.Partnership across borders.
Sharon Shin, Metadata Coordinator,Federal Geographic Data
Committee
Raphael Sussman; Manager, Lands Information Ontario
What is the NAPWhat is the NAP Community profile of ISO
19115 Geospatial Information – Metadata
Addresses metadata for geographic products.
Negotiated content between the ANSI and CGSB representatives.
Format: Profile with “best practices” and simplified diagrams for training, UML in annex
Net Benefits of MetadataNet Benefits of Metadata For data distributors: Metadata makes data
sharing: easier, less risky, and cheaper
For all enterprises: Metadata reduces the cost of losing information about spatial data assets, thereby
increasing the usability of those assets over time. Sustaining and value of the assets
Interoperability IssuesInteroperability Issues(Service Metadata)(Service Metadata)
Portals, using Internet, Intranet, and Extranet displays and/or integrates data
normally intended for use with specific, disparate applications without those applications
uses data from multiple sources without clearly defining quality or source of individual features
Interoperability IssuesInteroperability Issues
Web Services Discovery of Services (including data
services) by computers rather than by people
Simultaneous incorporation of live data from many sources (eg Web Map Services) originally created or stored in different formats, models, or quality
Content CSDGM similar and new elements Domains and conditionality Essential, as opposed to core, metadata
Format UML / XML Multi-level metadata-
Feature to Dataset Series or Service Feature to Dataset Series or Service
What’s similar/new with NAP What’s similar/new with NAP MetadataMetadata
Metadata Entity Set Information
Identification Information
Constraints Data Quality
Information Maintenance
Information Spatial
Representation Information
Reference System Information
Content Information
Portrayal Catalogue Information- new
Distribution Information
Application Schema Information - new
Major ClassesMajor Classes
ConditionalityConditionality SameSame
AbstractAbstract
Metadata Standard NameMetadata Standard Name New terminology and definitionsNew terminology and definitions
CSDGM = CSDGM = OriginatorOriginator
ISO = ISO = Responsible Party - RoleResponsible Party - Role
ISO Metadata / CSDGM ISO Metadata / CSDGM Similar ContentSimilar Content
ISO Metadata: Core ISO Metadata: Core ElementsElements
Dataset title Spatial representation type
Dataset reference date Reference system
Dataset responsible party Lineage statement
Geographic location On-line resource
Dataset language- new Metadata file identifier
Dataset character set- new
Metadata standard name
Dataset topic category- new
Metadata standard version
Spatial resolution Metadata language- new
Abstract Metadata character set- new
Distribution format Metadata point of contact
Additional extent info (vert / temp)
Metadata date stampmandatory
NAP: Essential MetadataNAP: Essential Metadata Requires reviewing the entire standard to
determine what is minimal metadata for each user.
Metadata Record Information – 7 mandatory Identification Information- 3 mandatory
All optional shown with the number of mandatory attributes/subclasses:
Data Quality 1 Maintenance Info 1 Descriptive Keywords 1 Resource Constraints 0 +1 Aggregate Info 1
Spatial Representation Info 4 + 7 Reference System Info 1 Content Info 2 or 3 + 2 Distribution Info 2 +1
FormatsFormats
Data Series wetlands
Dataset Paducah wetlands
Feature Type marsh
Attribute Type salinity
Attribute Instance actual % water salinity
Lands Information Ontario Lands Information Ontario Agreement Agreement
FGDC, FGDC Metadata Working Group, Land Information Ontario FGDC
Update materials, beginning May 1, 2008 and continuing to November 2009
LIOLIO
March 12, 2009 – 3 hr Webinar ~ 500 registants
3 – 5 yr Marketing plan to implement NAP
Graphic RepresentationGraphic Representation
LEGEND
Metadata
IdentificationInformation
DataQuality
Information
SpatialData
OrganizationInformation
SpatialReferenceInformation
Entityand
AttributeInformation
DistributionInformation
MetadataReferenceInformation
4. 5. 6. 7.1. 2. 3.
3-D BoxIndicates
Data EntryField
mandatorymandatory
if applicable
optional
Graphical Representation of:The Federal Geographic Data Committee's
Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
FGDC-STD-001, June 1998
Prepared by Susan Stitt, Center for Biological Informatics, USGSIn conjunction with the Federal Geographic Data Committee
Graphic RepresentationGraphic Representation5.2
Metadata Record Information
5.2.1Field
Identifier
5.2.2Language
5.2.3Character
Set
5.2.4Parent
Indentifier
5.2.5 Heirarchy
Level *
5.2.6Contact *See 5.16
Responsible Party
5.2.7Date
Stamp
5.2.8Metadata Standard
Name
5.2.9Metadata Standard Version
5.2.10Data Set
URI
5.2.11Locale
5.2.12Identification Information *
See 5.3.1 Data Identification and / or
5.3.2 Service Information
5.2.13Metadata
Constraints *See 5.4.1 Constraint
or 5.4.2 Legal Constraints or 5.4.3 Legal Constraints
5.2.14Data Quality Information *
See 5.5Data Quality
5.2.15Metadata
Maintenance Information
See 5.6 Metadata Maintenance
5.2.16Spatial
RepresentationInformation *
See 5.7.1 Grid Spatial
Representation and / or 5.7.2 Vector
Spatial Representation and /or 5.7.3 Georectified
and / or 5.7.4 Georeferenceable
5.2.17Reference System
Information *See 5.8
Reference System
5.2.18Content Information *
See 5.9.1 Feature Catalog Description
and / or 5.9.2Coverage Information
or 5.9.3 Image Description
5.2.19Portrayal Catalogue
Information *See 5.10
Portrayal Catalog Reference
5.2.20Distribution Information See 5.11
Distribution
5.2.21Application Schema
Information *See 5.12
Application Schema Information
6.2PT_Locale
NAP Training ModulesNAP Training Moduleshttp://www.fgdc.gov/training/training-http://www.fgdc.gov/training/training-
materialsmaterials
NAP Guidance DocumentsNAP Guidance Documents
ToolsTools
FGDC sponsored ISO metadata editor FGDC sponsored ISO metadata editor review.review. URL:http://www.fgdc.gov/participation/URL:http://www.fgdc.gov/participation/
working-groups-subcommittees/mwg/working-groups-subcommittees/mwg/ ISO/NAP Validation toolISO/NAP Validation tool CSDGM to ISO 19115 Conversion toolCSDGM to ISO 19115 Conversion tool
ContactsContacts
Raphael Sussman- ManagerRaphael Sussman- Manager Land Information OntarioLand Information Ontario [email protected]
Sharon Shin- Metadata CoordinatorSharon Shin- Metadata Coordinator Federal Geographic Data CommitteeFederal Geographic Data Committee [email protected]@usgs.gov
Supplemental SlidesSupplemental Slides
The FoundationThe FoundationRegional, national, & Regional, national, &
organizational profilesorganizational profiles
ISO19115:2003ISO19115:2003Geographic Information - MetadataGeographic Information - Metadata
State ProfileState Profile
ANZLIC ProfileANZLIC Profile
NATO ProfileNATO Profile
EO ProfileEO Profile Perfil Latinoamericano de MetadataPerfil Latinoamericano de Metadata
North American Profile North American Profile
European ProfileEuropean Profile
Navigation ProfileNavigation Profile
What is ISO 19115 What is ISO 19115 Geospatial Information - Geospatial Information -
MetadataMetadata Provides a schema for describing geographic data and services.
Applies to multiple levels of geographic information. Defines a core set of metadata required to serve the
full range of applications. Allows for multilingual metadata Establishes:
terminology definitions conditionality
NorthAmericanProfile of
ISO 19115Metadata
NorthAmericanProfile of
ISO 19115Metadata
Co-located MeetingsCo-located MeetingsParallel DevelopmentParallel Development
MOU between
Canada and the USA
NAP: Essential MetadataNAP: Essential Metadata Requires reviewing the entire standard to Requires reviewing the entire standard to
determine what is minimal metadata for determine what is minimal metadata for each user.each user.
Metadata Record Information – 7 mandatory Metadata Record Information – 7 mandatory Identification Information- 3 mandatoryIdentification Information- 3 mandatory
All optional with the number of mandatory All optional with the number of mandatory attributes/subclasses:attributes/subclasses:
Data Quality 1Data Quality 1 Maintenance Info 1Maintenance Info 1 Descriptive Keywords 1Descriptive Keywords 1 Resource Constraints 0 +1Resource Constraints 0 +1 Aggregate Info 1Aggregate Info 1
• Spatial Representation Info Spatial Representation Info
• 4 + 74 + 7
• Reference System Info 1Reference System Info 1
• Content Info 2 or 3 + 2Content Info 2 or 3 + 2
• Distribution Info 2 +1Distribution Info 2 +1
Fewer mandatory elementsFewer mandatory elements Fixed domains and code lists in Fixed domains and code lists in
place of free text to control place of free text to control vocabulary and improve vocabulary and improve discoverydiscovery
More optional elementsMore optional elements
ISO Metadata: Content- ISO Metadata: Content- Domains and Domains and ConditionalityConditionality