nonthermal treatments of fruit and vegetable products
TRANSCRIPT
Nonthermal Treatments of Fruit andVegetable Products
• Pulsed Electric Fields• High Pressure Processing • Plasma
Stefan ToepflGerman Institute of Food Technologies DIL e.V.
founded in 1983legal form not for profit
organisationCEO Dr. Volker Heinzmembers > 150employees > 160
DILFacts and Figures
Nonthermal TechnologiesRelevance
Nonthermal TechnologiesRelevance
Cold Plasma TreatmentApplications
Misra et al., 2014
Thirumdas et al., 2014
Surface decontamination of fruits and vegetables
High Pressure ProcessingIndustrial installations
Source: Carole Tonello
Total machine number installed: 350
Source: Carole Tonello
High Pressure ProcessingIndustrial installations
Source: Francisco Purroy
High Pressure ProcessingIndustrial installations
High Pressure ProcessingOperation
High Pressure ProcessingMicrobial inactivation
350 400 450 500 550 6000
60
120
180
240
300
Apricot
Pear
Apple
Pineapple
alc-free Beer
Tre
atm
en
t T
ime
[s]
Pressure [MPa]
40°C
350 400 450 500 550 6000
60
120
180
240
300
Apricot
Orange
Pineapple
Tre
atm
en
t T
ime
[s]
Pressure [MPa]
40°C
350 400 450 500 550 6000
60
120
180
240
300
Apricot
Orange
Pineapple
Tre
atm
en
t T
ime
[s]
Pressure [MPa]
40°C
L.rhamnosus Schiz. pombe Penicillium Isolate
Microbial inactivation in fruit juices, pressure / time required for 1 log inactivation
Serotype 4b(3987/04)
p-T isokineticity diagrams for 5 log inactivation of 3 pathogenic strains
of Listeria monocytogenes in “Black Forest Prosciutto” (Ham) after 15-
240 s.
Serotype CLIP 74903Serotype CLIP 74902 1/2a
High Pressure ProcessingMicrobial inactivation
Juices & smoothies
• Shelf-life increase.
• Preservation of colour, flavour and vitamins.
• Destruction of pathogens and spoiling microorganisms.
Country Year Product
France 1994 Citrus juices
Portugal 2001 Apple & citrus blended apple juice
Italy 2001 Fruit and vegetable juices
Czech Republic 2004 Broccoli & apple, beetroot, carrot juices
USA 2007 Juices and superfood smoothies
Spain 2007 Smoothies & juices
Australia 2008 Smoothies & juices
Northern Ireland 2008 Wheatgrass & broccoli sprout juices
The Netherlands 2009 Smoothies & Juices
USA 2010 Citrus juices
Korea 2010 Juices and smoothies
Italia 2010 Smoothies
UK 2011 Apple juices
USA 2011 Coconut water
USA 2011 Super fruit and vegetable juices
Korea 2011 Citrus juices
High Pressure ProcessingCommercial juice products
Source: Hiperbaric
High Pressure ProcessingCommercial juice products
“Starbucks Acquires Evolution Fresh to
Enter Wellness Space
With this acquisition, Starbucks will
reinvent the $1.6 billion super-premium
juice segment, its significant next step in
entering the larger $50 billion Health and
Wellness sector”.
Press Release Nov 2011
Source: Hiperbaric
Processing coconut water in Millard (3 x Hiperbaric 420)
“WE DID IT! INTRODUCING THE
WORLD'S FIRST RTD RAW &
ORGANIC COCONUT WATER.”
Source: Hiperbaric14
High Pressure ProcessingCommercial juice products
High Pressure ProcessingCommercial juice products
DIL UHDE HPP TOLLING CENTER
1 x 350 l cold press system
1 x 150 l hot press system
200 m2 chilled storage facilities
Treatment capacity
2.200 kg/h or up to 25 t/day
High Pressure ProcessingOutlook
Pulsed Electric Field ProcessingEffects on biological tissue
Pulsed Electric FieldsPotato industry
Approx 40 machines worldwidefor tissue softening at 50 t/h
Control: No PEF treatment
Heat treatment: 90°C-20 seconds
PEF treatment intensitiesPEF 1 13 kV/cm, Tin 40°C, 157 kJ/kgPEF 2 13 kV/cm, Tin 40°C, 182 kJ/kgPEF 3 13 kV/cm, Tin 44°C, 151 kJ/kgPEF 4 13 kV/cm, Tin 44°C, 155 kJ/kgPEF 5 13 kV/cm, Tin 48°C, 165 kJ/kgPEF 6 13 kV/cm, Tin 48°C, 142 kJ/kg
Untreated
PEF 1
PEF 2-6; Heat treatment
The lowest intensity PEF treatment increased the shelf life from 1 week (untreated) to more than 2 weeks. More intense PEF treatments can increase the shelf life up to 60 days under cold storage (4°C).
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Log
(cfu
/mL)
Days 4°C
Total Plate Count
Pulsed Electric FieldsOrange Juice
Co
ntr
ol
PEF
5
PEF
6
Hea
t Tr
eat.
After one day, the fresh juice presented a clear separation in the pulp, showing two fractions, one floating and as a sediment.
After 21 days, the sedimentation in the treated juices (PEF and thermal) was the same, about 25 mm lower compared to day 1.
The cloud was stable during the subsequent days, reaching a maximum sedimentation of 30 mm compared to day 1.
All the PEF treated juices were comparable to the thermal treated juice. Therefore the enzyme acivity was controlled.
Day 0
Day 61
Day 21
Pulsed Electric FieldsCloud stability
0
0,0005
0,001
0,0015
0,002
0,0025
0,003
UP
E/m
L
PME
PEF: 12.9 kV/cm, 90 kJ/kg, T in 50°C
Thermal treatment: 96°C, 10 s.
PEF can achieve an inactivation in pectyl methyl estherase (PME) comparable to the commercial thermal treatment applied in the industry.
Pulsed Electric FieldsCloud stability
22
Tube-in-tube heat exchanger. 1800 L/h. Heat recovery section included.
Pulsed Electric FieldsLine setup
Aseptic tankUNTREATED PRODUCT
Aseptic tankFINAL PRODUCT
PEF unit
TT
T Temperature control
Juice flow
Juice flow
35°C
4°C
55°C
4°C
4°C
*Temperatures shown here are illustrative
To filling line
Conditioning section
Cooling section
The heat recovery section uses the warm product to temper the cold product. Therefore less energy is required to condition the untreated juice and refrigerate the PEF juice.
Heat recovery section
20°C
20°C
Pulsed Electric FieldsLine setup
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Tem
per
atu
re (
°C)
Time (seconds)
The electrical energy delivered to the product is partially transformed into thermal energy. This is a side effect which is less relevant than the electroporation produced during the treatment. The treatment time is in the range of microseconds. Although the temperature peak can reach more than 60°C in high intensity treatments, the thermal load compared to a traditional thermal pasteurisation is much lower.
Temperature/time profile
LTLT pasteurisation
PEF pasteurisation
Thermal energy load Pasteurization units
HTST pasteurisation
HPP
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,8
2
PU
Pulsed Electric FieldsThermal load
(Netherlands)(UK)
(Netherlands)
(UK)
SupermarketsProducers
(Netherlands)
(Germany)
(Germany)
Pulsed Electric FieldsCommercial experience
5 kW systemCapacity: 1.500 kg/h for cell disintegration
200 l/h for microbial inactivation
30 kW systemCapacity: 10.000 kg/h for cell disintegration
1.500 to 1.800 l/h for microbial inactivation
Pulsed Electric FieldsEquipment
3530.00
3400.00
2100
.00
40 kW systemMarx generatorCapacity: 25.000 kg/h for cell disintegration
2.500 to 3.000 l/h for microbial inactivation
Pulsed Electric FieldsEquipment
80 kW systemMarx generatorCapacity: 50.000 kg/h for cell disintegration
5.000 to 6.000 l/h for microbial inactivation
Pulsed Electric FieldsEquipment
Pulsed Electric Field ProcessingChamber design
Improvement of homogeneity
Shrink-on design
Field concentration chamber
DN 50
Pulsed Electric FieldsInstalled systems
2 x 1.600 l/h
Pulsed Electric FieldsInstalled systems
1 x 1.800 l/h
Nonthermal TechnologiesCase study: juice pasteurisation
Comparison of HTST, PEF and HPP for SME juice processing company
2.000 – 3.000 l/h15 – 20 juice types per week
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
HTST
PEF
HPP
Energy kJ/kg
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
HTST
PEF
HPP
Temperature (°C)
Nonthermal TechnologiesEnergy requirement and maximum temperature
Nonthermal technologiesCase study: overview
HSTS PEF HPH HPP
Energyrequirement
150 kJ/kg 110 kJ/kg 120 kJ/kg 280 kJ/kg
Product loss(excluding filler)
Approx. 100 per batch
Approx 55 l per batch
Approx 55 l per batch
In pack treatment
Fillingrequirement
Ultraclean Ultraclean Ultraclean Standard
Typicalprocessing costs
0,005 – 0,01 €/l 0,01 – 0,02 €/l 0,07 – 0,10 €/l 0,20 – 0,30 €/l
Nonthermal technologiesApproval
Nonthermal technologiesApproval
Nonthermal technologiesLife cycle analysis
FU 1 l of processed juice, scope - from farm to gate; zero values of aquatic acidification and
eutrophication excluded; 1 kPt = impact of 1 European per year
~50%
Nonthermal technologiesLife cycle analysis
Aganovic, K., Smetana, S., Grauwet, T., Toepfl, S., Mathys, A., Van Loey, A., Heinz, V. Pilot scalethermal and alternative pasteurization oftomato and watermelon juice: an energycomparison and life cycle assessment. Journal of cleaner production (submitted)
• Making use of alternatives to thermal processing allows low temperature preservation
• HPP and PEF are in commercial use in food industry
• Technique to be selected dependent on product type, packaging, throughput and commercial background
Nonthermal technologiesConclusions