non representative pay verification representative pay...work number verification new snap case....
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Non representative pay verification Representative Pay...WORK NUMBER VERIFICATION New SNAP case. Filing date: 9/7/16 Work # (at time of the interview) New job. 8/13 is first paycheck](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022080720/5f7a18aa3135d303bb6baf95/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
NON REPRESENTATIVE PAY VERIFICATION
PRESENTED BY THE SOUTH REGION
![Page 2: Non representative pay verification Representative Pay...WORK NUMBER VERIFICATION New SNAP case. Filing date: 9/7/16 Work # (at time of the interview) New job. 8/13 is first paycheck](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022080720/5f7a18aa3135d303bb6baf95/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
WE WANT YOU !1. To be able to determine what representative
pay verification is, and what it isn’t.
2. To understand why it is, or isn’t, representative.
3. To have a clear grasp of what needs to be narrated regarding what was used, and why.
![Page 3: Non representative pay verification Representative Pay...WORK NUMBER VERIFICATION New SNAP case. Filing date: 9/7/16 Work # (at time of the interview) New job. 8/13 is first paycheck](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022080720/5f7a18aa3135d303bb6baf95/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
WORK NUMBER VERIFICATION
New SNAP case.
Filing date: 9/7/16
Work # (at time of the interview)
New job. 8/13 is first paycheck
(Notice, there is no 8/20 week pay visible)
Pay Period
End DatePay Date
Hours
Worked
Gross
Earnings
09/03/2016 09/10/2016 19.87 $210.32
08/27/2016 09/03/2016 32.17 $342.46
08/20/2016 08/27/2016 9.83 $102.52
08/06/2016 08/13/2016 34.64 $356.79
Historical Pay Period Summary
How would you address this case?
![Page 4: Non representative pay verification Representative Pay...WORK NUMBER VERIFICATION New SNAP case. Filing date: 9/7/16 Work # (at time of the interview) New job. 8/13 is first paycheck](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022080720/5f7a18aa3135d303bb6baf95/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
WORK NUMBER VERIFICATION
The worker narrated that pay date 8/20 was not used, since it wasn’t on Work # and customer didn’t know why.
Observations: 1st The 8/13 stub might not be representative since it was his first (and, likely, included training hours) 2nd Three weeks is not a month’s verification of income. 3rd 8/27 pay should have been excluded from calculation, as it is significantly less.
Conclusion: Not enough information to develop a good anticipation of income.
Pay Period
End DatePay Date
Hours
Worked
Gross
Earnings
09/03/2016 09/10/2016 19.87 $210.32
08/27/2016 09/03/2016 32.17 $342.46
08/20/2016 08/27/2016 9.83 $102.52
08/06/2016 08/13/2016 34.64 $356.79
Historical Pay Period Summary
Wkr used: 8/13, 8/27, 9/3 & 9/10 pay dates. $1012.09 / 4 x 4.3 =$1087.99
![Page 5: Non representative pay verification Representative Pay...WORK NUMBER VERIFICATION New SNAP case. Filing date: 9/7/16 Work # (at time of the interview) New job. 8/13 is first paycheck](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022080720/5f7a18aa3135d303bb6baf95/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Case # 2
What was reported on the application: • $13.25/hr• 40hrs/wk• Paid Bi-weekly
![Page 6: Non representative pay verification Representative Pay...WORK NUMBER VERIFICATION New SNAP case. Filing date: 9/7/16 Work # (at time of the interview) New job. 8/13 is first paycheck](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022080720/5f7a18aa3135d303bb6baf95/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
This check is not representative, as it only reflects 40 hrs for the pay period
This check is representative ,40 hrs wk
![Page 7: Non representative pay verification Representative Pay...WORK NUMBER VERIFICATION New SNAP case. Filing date: 9/7/16 Work # (at time of the interview) New job. 8/13 is first paycheck](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022080720/5f7a18aa3135d303bb6baf95/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Case # 3
7/16-7/22
• 40 hrs reg
• 7.73 ot
• 10.75 hr reg
• 16.125 ot
• Total=554.65
7/23-7/29
• 31.20 hrs reg
• 0.47 ot
• 10.75 hr reg
• 16.125 ot
• Total=342.98
8/6-8/12
• 40 hr reg
• 7.97 ot hrs
• 10.75 hr reg
• 16.125 ot
• Total=558.52
7/30-8/05
• 40.0 hrs reg
• 8.27 ot
• 10.75 hr reg
• 16.125 hr ot
• Total=563.35
Not representative! Reg., OT, and gross income much less
Need another week’s worth of verification or speak with employer
![Page 8: Non representative pay verification Representative Pay...WORK NUMBER VERIFICATION New SNAP case. Filing date: 9/7/16 Work # (at time of the interview) New job. 8/13 is first paycheck](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022080720/5f7a18aa3135d303bb6baf95/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
One pay stub is ½ the hours/pay of the other.
Address the difference in hrs/pay
Request more verification or speak with the employer
Case #4
Worker added the two for a monthly total, ignoring the differences.
![Page 9: Non representative pay verification Representative Pay...WORK NUMBER VERIFICATION New SNAP case. Filing date: 9/7/16 Work # (at time of the interview) New job. 8/13 is first paycheck](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022080720/5f7a18aa3135d303bb6baf95/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
FIRST STUB FROM NEW JOB
First check from new employment is often not representative of on-going pay
Customer anticipated 17 hrs/wk, so this stub would be representative (…unless worker gets contradictory information )
Case #5
![Page 10: Non representative pay verification Representative Pay...WORK NUMBER VERIFICATION New SNAP case. Filing date: 9/7/16 Work # (at time of the interview) New job. 8/13 is first paycheck](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022080720/5f7a18aa3135d303bb6baf95/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Worker used 8/26, 9/02, 9/09, and 9/16 dates
Paid weekly
Correct # of pay stubs used
Case #6
Is the 8 hrs used from 9/16 representative?Pay history says “no” Needs a more representative pay period
![Page 11: Non representative pay verification Representative Pay...WORK NUMBER VERIFICATION New SNAP case. Filing date: 9/7/16 Work # (at time of the interview) New job. 8/13 is first paycheck](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022080720/5f7a18aa3135d303bb6baf95/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
New job
Worker only used 1st pay check received
Customer said it was “representative”
Is this a “month’s worth” of verification?
Is customer’s statement sufficient information?
Worker needs to verify with employer it is representative of future eml.
Case #7
If the employer will not provide any further information, we may use what we have and review at 6 months
![Page 12: Non representative pay verification Representative Pay...WORK NUMBER VERIFICATION New SNAP case. Filing date: 9/7/16 Work # (at time of the interview) New job. 8/13 is first paycheck](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022080720/5f7a18aa3135d303bb6baf95/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
THIS BRINGS US TO THE END OF OUR TRAINING FROM THE SOUTHERN OREGON REGION
South Region Reviewers:John PetersDan BlesseTracy SmithLinda JohnstonTara Holcomb
Further Questions? You can reach our region’s Outlook mailbox at: PROGRAM ACCURACY –South Region