No. CoM Block Plan Guidelines (October 2014) – ‘preferred outcomes’ (1-6 of 18)

CoM Proposed Melbourne Planning Scheme Amendment C245 (April 2015)

Comment

1 Heritage Overlay HO7 applies to the entire site, desire to maintain a sense of history of the precinct and its evolution over time

HO7 remains, C198 increased heritage grading D to C for some buildings on the Munro site

Consistent

2 Retain Mercat Cross hotel building

As for 1 above, project intent unchanged Consistent

3 Podium street wall min 20m max 30m

Podium street wall reduced to min 10m max 20m and mandated (DPO Framework Plan and 2.0 Schedule 10). Stringent tower separation controls introduced (DDO Table 1 to Schedule 63)

C245 more stringent

4 Varied parapet height (20m-30m podiums)

Comprehensive design requirements (beyond parapets) demand higher architectural quality for podiums (DPO 2.0 Schedule 10 and DDO 2.0 Schedule 14)

C245 more stringent

5 Setback taller buildings min 10m (above 20m podiums) from street frontages

Mandatory tower setbacks min 10m from podium street frontage (Refer DPO 2.0 Schedule 10)

Consistent

6 Limit overall building heights no overshadowing of new open space (current QVM Car Park) 11am-2pm

*No overshadowing 11am-2pm at 21 June unless RA considers this will not ‘significantly prejudice’ the amenity of the public open space (site of current QVM Car Park)

Variation* to measure (21 June) and RA provided with discretion

Queen Victoria Market Precinct Renewal - Summary Comparison CoM ‘Therry, Elizabeth, Franklin, Queen Block: Plan (October 2014)’ and Proposed ‘Planning Scheme Amendment C245 (April 2015)’

4 May 2015

Attachment 5Agenda item 6.1

Future Melbourne Committee12 May 2015

No. CoM Block Plan Guidelines (October 2014) – ‘preferred outcomes’ (7-11 of 18)

CoM Proposed Melbourne Planning Scheme Amendment C245 (April 2015)

Comment

7 Minimise wind turbulence at ground level

Specific wind speed criterion included as requirements of DPO (DPO 2.0 and 3.0 Schedule 10)

More stringent

8 Create pedestrian link between Franklin and Therry streets

Included (DPO Figure 1 Framework Plan) Consistent

9 Vehicle crossovers to be designed maintain pedestrian amenity and safety

Vehicle ingress and egress to new development controlled by specific requirements in DPO (DPO 2.0 Schedule 10)

Consistent

10 Up to 400 car parking spaces from the number spaces permitted (MPS) for QVM patrons

720 existing QVM car parking spaces should be located on Parcel A (Munro site) and/or Parcel D (Southern Development Sites) (DPO 2.0 Schedule 10)

Variation

11 Activated street frontages (a) 80% ground level, (b) consider accessible balconies Therry and Queen Street, (c) mixed uses

Active frontage requirements (a) included, specific above ground accessible balcony requirement replaced with active uses to promote visual surveillance (DPO 2.0 Schedule 10 and DDO 2.0 Schedule 14 )

Variation

Queen Victoria Market Precinct Renewal - Summary Comparison CoM ‘Therry, Elizabeth, Franklin, Queen Block: Plan (October 2014)’ and Proposed ‘Planning Scheme Amendment C245 (April 2015)’ 4 May 2015

No. CoM Block Plan Guidelines (October 2014) – ‘preferred outcomes’ (12-18 of 18)

CoM Proposed Melbourne Planning Scheme Amendment C245 (April 2015)

Comment

12 Activated Pedestrian mid-block with 60% display windows, food & drink premises etc.

Mid-block link publicly accessible link included, without detailed 60% active frontage instead existing MPS Cluse 22.20 – CBD Lanes calls for activation in new lanes.

Consistent

13 Car parking, store rooms window less performance spaces to be setback 5-15m from street frontage

Active frontage requirements included without specific 5-15m detail requirement (DPO 2.0 Schedule 10 and DDO 2.0 Schedule 14 )

Variation

14 Weather protection for pedestrians

Continuous weather protection requirement in DPO and DDO (DPO 2.0 Schedule 10 and DDO 2.0 Schedule 14)

Consistent

15 Design capable of achieving 5 star green star

Provision in Melbourne Planning Scheme (MPS) Consistent with MPS

16 Review by Office of Victoria Government Architect (OVGA) Design Review Panel

Intention that the OVGA review designs, remains, unnecessary to be included in C245

Not applicable

17 OVGA to review of design drawings submitted by RA

As for 16 above Not applicable

18 Full planning assessment by OVGA

As for 16 above Not applicable

Queen Victoria Market Precinct Renewal - Summary Comparison CoM ‘Therry, Elizabeth, Franklin, Queen Block: Plan (October 2014)’ and Proposed ‘Planning Scheme Amendment C245 (April 2015)’ 4 May 2015