noblesville central storage case study

29
City of Noblesville LTCP – Phase 3: A Case Study of CSO Storage Facilities CHA Consulting | November 21, 2013

Upload: andrew-scales

Post on 11-Apr-2017

190 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

City of Noblesville LTCP – Phase 3: A Case Study of CSO Storage Facilities

CHA Consulting | November 21, 2013

Page 2: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Today’s Presentation•Background

– City of Noblesville– Long-Term Control Plan– Preliminary Design

•Detailed Design/Design Challenges– Storage Tank– Conveyance Sewer

•Construction Implementation

Page 3: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Noblesville, Indiana

Page 4: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Noblesville’s Collection System•Population = 40,000

•32 Square Mile Service Area

•233 Miles of Separate Sanitary Sewer

•12 Miles of Combined Sewer

Page 5: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Noblesville’s CSO Locations•Eight CSO Outfall Locations

– Six Outfalls to White River– Two Outfalls to Wilson’s Ditch

Page 6: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Noblesville’s Regional/Phased Approach to LTCP•CSO Area Broken into Four Regions

– North Region – Sewer Separation– East/Central/South Regions – Convey,

Store & Treat

Page 7: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study
Page 8: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Phase 3: Preliminary Design•SWMM Modeling

– Determine overflow rates – size relief sewers

– Determine overflow volumes – size storage facilities

•Focus on Worst Regions First– East Relief Sewer– Central Relief Sewer

•Central Storage Facility

•Modeled Proposed Facilities

Page 9: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Phase 3, Division 2: Preliminary Design•2.2 MG Underground Storage

– 1.2 MG Storage Tank (sized for 1-YR, 1-HR Storm)

– 1.0 MG Storage Tank (sized for 10-YR, 1-HR Storm

•Dual Submersible 5 MGD Dewatering Pumps

– Controlled by VFDs integrated into Plant SCADA

– Dewatering to WWTP Headworks

•Cleaning via nine (9) hydraulically operated flushing gates.

Page 10: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Phase 3, Division 2: Detailed Design

Page 11: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Phase 3, Division 2: Detailed Design

Page 12: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Phase 3, Division 2: Detailed Design

Page 13: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Phase 3, Division 2: Detailed Design

Page 14: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Phase 3, Division 2: Detailed Design

Page 15: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Phase 3, Division 2: Construction Implementation

Page 16: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Phase 3, Division 2: Construction Implementation

Page 17: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Phase 3, Division 2: Construction Implementation

Page 18: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Phase 3, Division 2: Construction Implementation

Page 19: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Phase 3, Division 2: Construction Implementation

Page 20: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Phase 3, Division 2: Construction Implementation

Page 21: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Phase 3, Division 2: Construction Implementation

Page 22: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Phase 3, Division 2: Construction Implementation

Page 23: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Phase 3, Division 2: Construction Implementation

Page 24: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Phase 3, Division 2: Construction Implementation

Page 25: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Phase 3, Division 2: Construction Implementation

Page 26: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Phase 3, Division 2: Construction Implementation

Page 27: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Phase 3, Division 2: Construction Implementation

Page 28: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study

Phase 3, Division 2: Construction Implementation

Page 29: Noblesville Central Storage Case Study