nitrogen use efficiency, crop productivity and ... · nitrogen use efficiency, crop productivity...

4

Click here to load reader

Upload: tranliem

Post on 07-Sep-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Crop Productivity and ... · Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Crop Productivity and Environmental Impacts of Urea Deep Placement in Lowland Rice Fields Yam Gaihre

Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Crop Productivityand Environmental Impacts of Urea Deep

Placement in Lowland Rice Fields

Yam GaihreSoil ScientistInternational Fertilizer Development Center (IFDC)Bangladesh

Page 2: Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Crop Productivity and ... · Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Crop Productivity and Environmental Impacts of Urea Deep Placement in Lowland Rice Fields Yam Gaihre

Urea Deep Placement (UDP) in Lowland Rice Fields

• Nitrogen recovery (REN): 30 –50%

• Losses to the environment—Leaching, Surface runoff,ammonia volatilization, N2Oand NO emissions

• Increase RE from 30-50 % to70-75%

• Increase in grain yield up to20% while saving 30% ureafertilizer

Urea Briquette NPK Briquette

Broadcast method Deep placement

Page 3: Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Crop Productivity and ... · Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Crop Productivity and Environmental Impacts of Urea Deep Placement in Lowland Rice Fields Yam Gaihre

UDP: More Grains with Less UreaReduces NH4 in Floodwaterand NH3 Volatilization

Increases Yields and NUE

UDP increased grain yields by 21%compared to broadcast PU.

Doubled the NUE over broadcast PU(35 %vs 70%)0

5

10

15

20

0 2 4 6 1 3 5 7 0 2 4 6

NH

4-N (k

g ha

-1)

Days after fertilizer application

Control UDP Broadcast PU

IstTD

2ndTD

3rd

TD

0

2

4

6

8

2014 (CSW) 2015 (AWD)

Gra

in y

ield

(t h

a-1 )

Control Broadcast PU UDP

Page 4: Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Crop Productivity and ... · Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Crop Productivity and Environmental Impacts of Urea Deep Placement in Lowland Rice Fields Yam Gaihre

UDP Reduces GHG N2O and NO emissions Reduced emissions by up to 80%

as compared to broadcast PUunder continuous standing water(CSW) management regime.

The effects of UDP under the AWDwater management regime weresite specific depending on theduration and intensity of soil drying.

0

200

400

600

800

2014 (CSW) 2015 (AWD)

N2O

(g N

ha-1

)

Control Broadcast PU UDP

0

200

400

600

800

2014 (CSW) 2015 (AWD)

N2O

(g N

ha-1

)

Control Broadcast PU UDP

BAU Site

BRRI Site

P#24P#24