nienaber v citibank and romanelli v associates memorandum opinion and order on motions for attorneys...
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 Nienaber v Citibank and Romanelli v Associates Memorandum Opinion and Order on Motions for Attorneys Fees a
1/8
44-cv-454LLP Dumnt 11 Filed 7/27 1f
E ST TS DISTRC O
STRICT OF OUH AKT
SOUTRN DMON***************************
RY NABER, on bef o herslf and l others imay it,
V. 0-
Plainifs
CTAN (OH KOT) .A
Dedant
LSA O on bhalf of rsl lthes sim l tuatd
aints
ASO TOA BNK
ORU OPIO N OD N MO O AO EES A CSTS*
***
*
*
Dd *****************
In h solde la cto P ged Dfn Bas pib
sd ceain cd' i eps n o f F C Rpo he
ps t a tptn Stee t or has sud it Oe o Fa Apprval
of s Stteent d F Jgmnt D 9 S peg b Co a Pan K
eab ad Ls Romell' pat qug ws aty s, sts d
s x. pton of etle onns " sig prov o wih ad at
n x1 " eb' us a ree o ek wd o
1A r il agem a ee ded geeme "wee e pay e g o ct h mu t aard by -ting ct s log l h n ng" 925 18 0
-
8/13/2019 Nienaber v Citibank and Romanelli v Associates Memorandum Opinion and Order on Motions for Attorneys Fees a
2/8
40-cv-04054LLP 101 Filed 2 of 8
$750,0. atoy fs ad s, iank h geed no o oppoe plao
Nenbers cosel ay s and ense ch d ece 0 R
co ve gre no s an wd of mo th 200 r atoy a ot,
Citn as agd o oos n appiation by Rol's ousel to es and
x wh does n ceed 0 k agrs to ay h a fs n
xs a e appd by te r th conion the l neat negotae eiling
Ners Moto Awd of Atoes es es Ta n Cs Dc 7
sod by the ao oas . Los S an atce ex (Dc. 88) h
lemna deaton o Tmas . yons S 94, he deon Thms yon
J d aachd xits (o 9 dclaa of Jo C g an aced xbs c 9
a Nabes suoting be 9 Rmanel M r A o y aRebuseme of Exenss (Do qes $00 n cm ay es ot ad
sals ta an soed e dao o Ja ac ad atad 83
claa Da A ls n atae bts Dc 4 Rm's upg
bf Do 8)
A hag as l Feb 1 07 Pats ot F ro a
Ai n ' M r ' o n Se Tx N
mee f h Setteent Class ha ojed Pli motio tey e s ad sal
loh obo te Setemen gen wee d u 8, by an Hd
a os d c 75 a hrwa o hs oj a ed Fu 8 o
9 e ou p e whwal oHyde Cd oecns an o ojct pd
a h arg ebur 00 Sbsqnt o eg a cdert o
mens n e quet wd o s s o ss Od ustin
tna Inmtion (Do 98) regdg e e o ass mbes w aual d
s ts ao Ta ao bn pe o Cot Doc one
s Ci 191.
2e pes egged spe semnt a wit erd ay s
2
-
8/13/2019 Nienaber v Citibank and Romanelli v Associates Memorandum Opinion and Order on Motions for Attorneys Fees a
3/8
4:04-cv-04054LL Dunt 10 Fled Pag 3f
a la Even i they saw th publsed nato regad h cs cion, ld b fcu
r poena caman to kow i hey act ad a Thi ad been sl
exes y e Cr to haring and a te reaso ta the Co eqie oe exenv
pubic ice a d onlly een conemlaed y e tes Doc. 9
DISUSION
Th bd ss wt cns o etais a tual bais t suport an aa of aoefes
ad Cout eas the responby o utiizig ruets r atoey e Se Johnst
Cmrica Mrg. rp, 83 F3 241 4 (8th r. 16). dtrc cou ms et e
reasoaee f toey e e nowandg te ha uch e re subjec a c
saing e agreemen a owtstag fc ta te sorce o paye e ate e
doe o diet par th ca e S Du Hk L In 98 Spp 75 3-3 D Mas "Bease any w [o attoey es] a e poia
'pecedental ale i tre case, te ot oes uy to h npl developmnt f e aw
o x u jmet n eviewig ae-uon ee me 98 F Supp a t
Webrr G N ks 9 Fd 26 ( Ci 91)
apra amout of atoey s mus e deeied on h fs of eac ae In
deennge apropae mout oey n a i ae te are wee t t
ous d Amecan B Assoato av cosidered a e eea T e fosd:
1 the tme and ao rd; e oey ad clt o e e ) eskl quite to e te ea sre roly ( e o o lyey e atoey due to acetae o case he stoay e; 6 whethe ee i xed o onge me laons iosed by h t or thirctance 8 e amout olved a th ret otaied ( h xprenc,repuato and by o e aoys (10 e undesabiit of the as ( thate a le o e pooal rlatonsp he ce nd ads nl ae
ly Ekr 4US24 43 (983 ( oln l Rgts Attoey Fe Aw
Ac). Te Supe our h oned w egad o atoey e aads at te m tical
c te degree of sccess obted kr 4 S a 436
o m apraces e tzed o ayz a res r aey Uder h "e
3
-
8/13/2019 Nienaber v Citibank and Romanelli v Associates Memorandum Opinion and Order on Motions for Attorneys Fees a
4/8
Cs 4:0-cv454L Dumnt 11 Fed 4 f
pc, xdd by counsel mlple by a rasable url ra ofcompenain
prdc a e aou, ad hi amunt my adjd p dwn to c he
indiuaiz rct of pl ci. Se Inc F Cor 95 Fd 7,
2960 (8h Cir.99T secd h "percenae th bee' aoh, perits n
w f ttoy that qu om con o comon cunl ere
succl gte ng the cue of igi n ss See Jhst iMg.
Co 83 3 1, 46 (8 C 996); Wi 968 Fd 47 (8 Cr192)
distc r s he seo o co wc t pply nton omea r
Co 8 at 6
C
Pli L Ranli rqi an d f atoey e ad expess e mo $200000 conte y e o toe a c 1
U.SC 8na or vig brogh a ccesf aon r te ar ei Ren Ac
Th t ut t Ps av sued pvdng Cl mb wih ou
t edi ptcton v vld prxml $4170 p mr, d hve aciee
frhr cing o a e don ial etmn wh e Plants
a by Ctbank ss nd m maon a e nk
l' a s and xpe. Con n ou ha w etee cap
Romnl' ut r s n ss a 0000.00 ha is c oy ny-i
pcn 76 % f l l nd c t h da b io mon
15 US.A 16 n a3) ode:n pes who u fal o cop h ee md th bcher h rspc to y cou i able o at m i a ea e um --
(3) n c of a sce acto t nrc an lt unde h o os o ai ee w eso ao m by u
4
-
8/13/2019 Nienaber v Citibank and Romanelli v Associates Memorandum Opinion and Order on Motions for Attorneys Fees a
5/8
Cs 404--04054LLP Dumnt 101 5 f
Pa Rae cone tr rqut oey e rasonbl uder
it a pecnag o h et o os nalysi and r rgen ad dcumetain
b Te v atos om Fracs & Malman, P .C wo woke on ome s se d hr
e our gig fo $25 o $36. Th aa o Fnc & Mln P
wo wore o Roanei's se l1 tei i t a urly a ranging o $95 1 he
Cou, ter cosdrng he ae-reeced wele fct lde ta ho d
hou xdd y e ey d leg o rncs Mn P i reob.
he t aoeys Dov Ses L wo woked n Roanli s e l
i t a rl rate aging o $0 o $ plgs o Dv C
wo woked on Rmaels ca bid t ie a a ou e rgg o $14 t 7
Te Co ns th te h xpede by e toe egas fo Dno aleC is . Hower he o coclus ate cosieg t reeen we
cs and th iaon regig e cstoar e o sia l
an e . t a oy re wd e ore eaoae f e a ad t a $
oury woud m raoale pregals fm Dovn Sls LC e o
conce hat e tes wou ru a reaoble e n tha th rt i c tat it woud
q p a atoey.
Hkv 342 158 162 8thCir 99oweereen afte eg e ouy
at te atoes nd aaega Donon Sels, LC h desa nis p a
awad t es d cs li oanei te on of ,0 qeed
Col fr Near
uel r at Kay Neab, i euetig an awrd o aoe es ad pees
e amout $000 iese ced tey re enited oey s ad cs sa
o 15 USC 681() havg brog a scesfl acon dr he F Ce Rptg
Ac sel Neber eests at f or in s rn dee ul o
b bd pn omo nd ocne etee ued te a o $42 i on),
fs b awded bsed uo the les med wt a mup.
ul Niab cit o cas a tha po t adng n o h
ecov la co coon d cae i a mr ci nd apopa me of luai
-
8/13/2019 Nienaber v Citibank and Romanelli v Associates Memorandum Opinion and Order on Motions for Attorneys Fees a
6/8
-
8/13/2019 Nienaber v Citibank and Romanelli v Associates Memorandum Opinion and Order on Motions for Attorneys Fees a
7/8
40v4LL 1 Filed 7 f
T ix teys Lynn Jakon Schulz & b P.C e ie b
ai a an ly ae ag om $150 $22 r hr and ea aisat b
at a ouly ae o $7 per our y, Jas Schul Lbn lo bmited
uibrsd eee ttang 88.35 Te Co d e tal mi f es nd
exeses of e asa and apoves he sae
Te aey rLyons a Fi, PA ild his e o eae' acio a a ry at
ranging m $0 4 pe ur, d he m' lea asta ed te t a an or ly rat
gg om $ $ er ur yn a Fm alo te uebuse pe
ttaln $8,88 e Ct nd te hory ae o 0 t b m e aale t $
adjsts te ii rele he sam a apre r e y Fi s a pese
te at f 0818T aey Cs s Cenr P. led his ie Nnab at at
a hy at pr or d t la assian illed im at a hu a f
pr hou. m Juse etr P ao mtd eimrse epese alg
$ Th d te sme u ers t sumio es an ens f
$891 b easab a a am
Accg
IT I BY ORDE, ADJUDGED N DECED h:
I f Ky Nbr's Mtn f Aar Attoeys ees Sae ax ad
Cs D 8) i grate o e een se i i non, a b
sl awd he t f $860 atoy ale ta a
; d
lantaaelsM wa Ateys e a Rrsemnt
of Epees ( 8] i a n is ety ad oael s cnsl
7
-
8/13/2019 Nienaber v Citibank and Romanelli v Associates Memorandum Opinion and Order on Motions for Attorneys Fees a
8/8
Cs 404v04054LL Dumnt 10 Fd 7 /0500 Pag
wdd sum f 20000000 r atoey fee and expne.
Dd this_ ciy f Jy 00
BY TH OUT:
C Lfoable Lawee L. Pieol
Utd Sas Dc Jug
AET: (SE) DEPY
8