nienaber v citibank and romanelli v associates memorandum opinion and order on motions for attorneys...

Upload: ghostgrip

Post on 04-Jun-2018

228 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Nienaber v Citibank and Romanelli v Associates Memorandum Opinion and Order on Motions for Attorneys Fees a

    1/8

    44-cv-454LLP Dumnt 11 Filed 7/27 1f

    E ST TS DISTRC O

    STRICT OF OUH AKT

    SOUTRN DMON***************************

    RY NABER, on bef o herslf and l others imay it,

    V. 0-

    Plainifs

    CTAN (OH KOT) .A

    Dedant

    LSA O on bhalf of rsl lthes sim l tuatd

    aints

    ASO TOA BNK

    ORU OPIO N OD N MO O AO EES A CSTS*

    ***

    *

    *

    Dd *****************

    In h solde la cto P ged Dfn Bas pib

    sd ceain cd' i eps n o f F C Rpo he

    ps t a tptn Stee t or has sud it Oe o Fa Apprval

    of s Stteent d F Jgmnt D 9 S peg b Co a Pan K

    eab ad Ls Romell' pat qug ws aty s, sts d

    s x. pton of etle onns " sig prov o wih ad at

    n x1 " eb' us a ree o ek wd o

    1A r il agem a ee ded geeme "wee e pay e g o ct h mu t aard by -ting ct s log l h n ng" 925 18 0

  • 8/13/2019 Nienaber v Citibank and Romanelli v Associates Memorandum Opinion and Order on Motions for Attorneys Fees a

    2/8

    40-cv-04054LLP 101 Filed 2 of 8

    $750,0. atoy fs ad s, iank h geed no o oppoe plao

    Nenbers cosel ay s and ense ch d ece 0 R

    co ve gre no s an wd of mo th 200 r atoy a ot,

    Citn as agd o oos n appiation by Rol's ousel to es and

    x wh does n ceed 0 k agrs to ay h a fs n

    xs a e appd by te r th conion the l neat negotae eiling

    Ners Moto Awd of Atoes es es Ta n Cs Dc 7

    sod by the ao oas . Los S an atce ex (Dc. 88) h

    lemna deaton o Tmas . yons S 94, he deon Thms yon

    J d aachd xits (o 9 dclaa of Jo C g an aced xbs c 9

    a Nabes suoting be 9 Rmanel M r A o y aRebuseme of Exenss (Do qes $00 n cm ay es ot ad

    sals ta an soed e dao o Ja ac ad atad 83

    claa Da A ls n atae bts Dc 4 Rm's upg

    bf Do 8)

    A hag as l Feb 1 07 Pats ot F ro a

    Ai n ' M r ' o n Se Tx N

    mee f h Setteent Class ha ojed Pli motio tey e s ad sal

    loh obo te Setemen gen wee d u 8, by an Hd

    a os d c 75 a hrwa o hs oj a ed Fu 8 o

    9 e ou p e whwal oHyde Cd oecns an o ojct pd

    a h arg ebur 00 Sbsqnt o eg a cdert o

    mens n e quet wd o s s o ss Od ustin

    tna Inmtion (Do 98) regdg e e o ass mbes w aual d

    s ts ao Ta ao bn pe o Cot Doc one

    s Ci 191.

    2e pes egged spe semnt a wit erd ay s

    2

  • 8/13/2019 Nienaber v Citibank and Romanelli v Associates Memorandum Opinion and Order on Motions for Attorneys Fees a

    3/8

    4:04-cv-04054LL Dunt 10 Fled Pag 3f

    a la Even i they saw th publsed nato regad h cs cion, ld b fcu

    r poena caman to kow i hey act ad a Thi ad been sl

    exes y e Cr to haring and a te reaso ta the Co eqie oe exenv

    pubic ice a d onlly een conemlaed y e tes Doc. 9

    DISUSION

    Th bd ss wt cns o etais a tual bais t suport an aa of aoefes

    ad Cout eas the responby o utiizig ruets r atoey e Se Johnst

    Cmrica Mrg. rp, 83 F3 241 4 (8th r. 16). dtrc cou ms et e

    reasoaee f toey e e nowandg te ha uch e re subjec a c

    saing e agreemen a owtstag fc ta te sorce o paye e ate e

    doe o diet par th ca e S Du Hk L In 98 Spp 75 3-3 D Mas "Bease any w [o attoey es] a e poia

    'pecedental ale i tre case, te ot oes uy to h npl developmnt f e aw

    o x u jmet n eviewig ae-uon ee me 98 F Supp a t

    Webrr G N ks 9 Fd 26 ( Ci 91)

    apra amout of atoey s mus e deeied on h fs of eac ae In

    deennge apropae mout oey n a i ae te are wee t t

    ous d Amecan B Assoato av cosidered a e eea T e fosd:

    1 the tme and ao rd; e oey ad clt o e e ) eskl quite to e te ea sre roly ( e o o lyey e atoey due to acetae o case he stoay e; 6 whethe ee i xed o onge me laons iosed by h t or thirctance 8 e amout olved a th ret otaied ( h xprenc,repuato and by o e aoys (10 e undesabiit of the as ( thate a le o e pooal rlatonsp he ce nd ads nl ae

    ly Ekr 4US24 43 (983 ( oln l Rgts Attoey Fe Aw

    Ac). Te Supe our h oned w egad o atoey e aads at te m tical

    c te degree of sccess obted kr 4 S a 436

    o m apraces e tzed o ayz a res r aey Uder h "e

    3

  • 8/13/2019 Nienaber v Citibank and Romanelli v Associates Memorandum Opinion and Order on Motions for Attorneys Fees a

    4/8

    Cs 4:0-cv454L Dumnt 11 Fed 4 f

    pc, xdd by counsel mlple by a rasable url ra ofcompenain

    prdc a e aou, ad hi amunt my adjd p dwn to c he

    indiuaiz rct of pl ci. Se Inc F Cor 95 Fd 7,

    2960 (8h Cir.99T secd h "percenae th bee' aoh, perits n

    w f ttoy that qu om con o comon cunl ere

    succl gte ng the cue of igi n ss See Jhst iMg.

    Co 83 3 1, 46 (8 C 996); Wi 968 Fd 47 (8 Cr192)

    distc r s he seo o co wc t pply nton omea r

    Co 8 at 6

    C

    Pli L Ranli rqi an d f atoey e ad expess e mo $200000 conte y e o toe a c 1

    U.SC 8na or vig brogh a ccesf aon r te ar ei Ren Ac

    Th t ut t Ps av sued pvdng Cl mb wih ou

    t edi ptcton v vld prxml $4170 p mr, d hve aciee

    frhr cing o a e don ial etmn wh e Plants

    a by Ctbank ss nd m maon a e nk

    l' a s and xpe. Con n ou ha w etee cap

    Romnl' ut r s n ss a 0000.00 ha is c oy ny-i

    pcn 76 % f l l nd c t h da b io mon

    15 US.A 16 n a3) ode:n pes who u fal o cop h ee md th bcher h rspc to y cou i able o at m i a ea e um --

    (3) n c of a sce acto t nrc an lt unde h o os o ai ee w eso ao m by u

    4

  • 8/13/2019 Nienaber v Citibank and Romanelli v Associates Memorandum Opinion and Order on Motions for Attorneys Fees a

    5/8

    Cs 404--04054LLP Dumnt 101 5 f

    Pa Rae cone tr rqut oey e rasonbl uder

    it a pecnag o h et o os nalysi and r rgen ad dcumetain

    b Te v atos om Fracs & Malman, P .C wo woke on ome s se d hr

    e our gig fo $25 o $36. Th aa o Fnc & Mln P

    wo wore o Roanei's se l1 tei i t a urly a ranging o $95 1 he

    Cou, ter cosdrng he ae-reeced wele fct lde ta ho d

    hou xdd y e ey d leg o rncs Mn P i reob.

    he t aoeys Dov Ses L wo woked n Roanli s e l

    i t a rl rate aging o $0 o $ plgs o Dv C

    wo woked on Rmaels ca bid t ie a a ou e rgg o $14 t 7

    Te Co ns th te h xpede by e toe egas fo Dno aleC is . Hower he o coclus ate cosieg t reeen we

    cs and th iaon regig e cstoar e o sia l

    an e . t a oy re wd e ore eaoae f e a ad t a $

    oury woud m raoale pregals fm Dovn Sls LC e o

    conce hat e tes wou ru a reaoble e n tha th rt i c tat it woud

    q p a atoey.

    Hkv 342 158 162 8thCir 99oweereen afte eg e ouy

    at te atoes nd aaega Donon Sels, LC h desa nis p a

    awad t es d cs li oanei te on of ,0 qeed

    Col fr Near

    uel r at Kay Neab, i euetig an awrd o aoe es ad pees

    e amout $000 iese ced tey re enited oey s ad cs sa

    o 15 USC 681() havg brog a scesfl acon dr he F Ce Rptg

    Ac sel Neber eests at f or in s rn dee ul o

    b bd pn omo nd ocne etee ued te a o $42 i on),

    fs b awded bsed uo the les med wt a mup.

    ul Niab cit o cas a tha po t adng n o h

    ecov la co coon d cae i a mr ci nd apopa me of luai

  • 8/13/2019 Nienaber v Citibank and Romanelli v Associates Memorandum Opinion and Order on Motions for Attorneys Fees a

    6/8

  • 8/13/2019 Nienaber v Citibank and Romanelli v Associates Memorandum Opinion and Order on Motions for Attorneys Fees a

    7/8

    40v4LL 1 Filed 7 f

    T ix teys Lynn Jakon Schulz & b P.C e ie b

    ai a an ly ae ag om $150 $22 r hr and ea aisat b

    at a ouly ae o $7 per our y, Jas Schul Lbn lo bmited

    uibrsd eee ttang 88.35 Te Co d e tal mi f es nd

    exeses of e asa and apoves he sae

    Te aey rLyons a Fi, PA ild his e o eae' acio a a ry at

    ranging m $0 4 pe ur, d he m' lea asta ed te t a an or ly rat

    gg om $ $ er ur yn a Fm alo te uebuse pe

    ttaln $8,88 e Ct nd te hory ae o 0 t b m e aale t $

    adjsts te ii rele he sam a apre r e y Fi s a pese

    te at f 0818T aey Cs s Cenr P. led his ie Nnab at at

    a hy at pr or d t la assian illed im at a hu a f

    pr hou. m Juse etr P ao mtd eimrse epese alg

    $ Th d te sme u ers t sumio es an ens f

    $891 b easab a a am

    Accg

    IT I BY ORDE, ADJUDGED N DECED h:

    I f Ky Nbr's Mtn f Aar Attoeys ees Sae ax ad

    Cs D 8) i grate o e een se i i non, a b

    sl awd he t f $860 atoy ale ta a

    ; d

    lantaaelsM wa Ateys e a Rrsemnt

    of Epees ( 8] i a n is ety ad oael s cnsl

    7

  • 8/13/2019 Nienaber v Citibank and Romanelli v Associates Memorandum Opinion and Order on Motions for Attorneys Fees a

    8/8

    Cs 404v04054LL Dumnt 10 Fd 7 /0500 Pag

    wdd sum f 20000000 r atoey fee and expne.

    Dd this_ ciy f Jy 00

    BY TH OUT:

    C Lfoable Lawee L. Pieol

    Utd Sas Dc Jug

    AET: (SE) DEPY

    8