Department of Engineering and Public Works

P.O. Box 21229

West Palm Beach, FL 33416-1229

(561) 684-4000

FAX: (561) 684-4050

www.pbcgov.com

• Palm Beach County

Board of County Commissioners

Melissa McKinlay, Mayor

Mack Bernard, Vice Mayor

Hal R. Valeche

Paulette Burdick

Dave Kerner

Steven L. Abrams

Mary Lou Berger

County Administrator

Verdenia C. Baker

"An Equal Opportunity

Affirmative Action Employer"

~ printed on sustainable lt:icY and recycled paper

October 22, 2018

Vicki L. Castro, P.E. Whitehouse Group, Inc. 401 East Jackson Street, Suite 3300 Tampa, FL 33602

RE: Caliber Collision -Lake Worth FLUA Amendment Policy 3.5-d Review Round 2019-B

Dear Ms. Castro:

Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed Future Land Use Amendment for the above referenced project, dated September 7, 2018, pursuant to Policy 3.5-d of the Land Use Element of the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan. The project is summarized as follows:

Location: West side of Haverhill Rd, about 600 feet north of Lantana Rd

PCN: 00-4 2-44-3 5-24-002-0000

Acres: 4.65 acres

Current FLU Proposed FLU

FLU: Commercial Low (CL) Industrial

Zoning: Residential Single Family (RS) Light Industrial (IL)

Density/ 0.2 FAR 0.45 FAR Intensity:

Maximum General Commercial = Industrial =

Potential: 40,511 SF 91,149 SF

Proposed NIA Automobile Care Center =

Potential: 18,635 SF

Net Daily -1,695 (maximum - current) Trips: -1,567 (proposed - current)

Net PH 64 (56/8) AM, 57 (7/50) PM (maximum) Trips: 42 (28/14) AM, 58 (28/30) PM (proposed) *Maximum indicates typical FAR and maximum trip generator. Proposed indicates the specific uses and intensities/densities in the zoning application.

Vicki L. Castro, P.E. October 22, 2018 Page2

Based on the review, the Traffic Division has determined that the traffic impacts of the proposed amendment meets Policy 3.5-d of the Future Land Use Element of the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan at the maximum potential density shown above.

Please contact me at 561-684-4030 or email to QBari@pbcgov.org with any questions.

Sincerely,

~~· Quazi Bari, P .E. Senior Professional Engineer - Traffic Division

QB:HA/dd ec: Michael R. Yates, Whitehouse Group (myates@whitehousegroup.com)

Jim Norquest, Gunster Unorquest@gunster.com) Hanane Akif - Project Coordinator II, Traffic Division Steve Bohovsky - Technical Assistant III, Traffic Division Lisa Amara - Senior Planner, Planning Division Khurshid Mohyuddin - Principal Planner, Planning Division Jorge Perez - Senior Planner, Planning Division

File: General - TPS - Unincorporated - Traffic Study Review N:\TRAFFIC\Development Review\Comp Plan\19-B\Caliber Collision - Lake Worth (2).docx

COMP PLAN AMENDMENT ANALYSIS Caliber Collision – Lake Worth

Prepared for: Cross Development

Comp Plan Amendment Analysis Caliber Collision – Lake Worth

September 2018

Prepared for: Cross Development

Prepared by: Whitehouse Group Inc. 401 East Jackson Street

Suite 3300 Tampa, FL 33602

Ph: (813) 359-8770

Project No. T0117.00

Vicki L. Castro, P.E. P.E. No. 47128

____________________ ________________Date

Comp Plan Amendment Analysis – Caliber Collision – Lake Worth i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 Project Description.................................................................................................................. 1 Estimated Daily Project Traffic ............................................................................................ 1 Estimated AM Peak Hour Project Traffic ............................................................................ 4 Estimated PM Peak Hour Project Traffic ............................................................................ 4 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 4

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Project Location ................................................................................................................................ 2

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. Estimated Daily Project Traffic ...................................................................................................... 3 Table 2. AM Peak Hour Project Traffic ........................................................................................................ 5 Table 3. PM Peak Hour Project Traffic ........................................................................................................ 6

LIST OF APPENDICES

Conceptual Site Plan

Trip Generation – Current and Proposed FLU

Trip Generation – Proposed Use

Passerby Rates

Comp Plan Amendment Analysis – Caliber Collision – Lake Worth 1

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this report is to support the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the property

located west of Haverhill Road and north of Lantana Road in the City of Lake Worth, Florida, as

shown in Figure 1.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The site is currently vacant. The current Future Land Use (FLU) is General Commercial with a FAR of

0.20, which allows for up to 40,511 square feet of commercial. The proposed FLU is Industrial with

a FAR of 0.45, which allows up to 91,149 square feet. The project is proposed to develop up to

18,635 square feet of automobile body shop.

A conceptual site plan is included in the Appendix of this report.

ESTIMATED DAILY PROJECT TRAFFIC

The trip rates utilized in this report were obtained from the latest computerized version of “OTISS”

which utilizes the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation, 10th Edition, 2017, as

its data base. Based on these trip rates, it is estimated that the proposed land use will attract 580

daily trip ends, as shown in Table 1. The current FLU attracts approximately 3,253 daily trip ends,

as shown in Table 1.

Studies contained in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, indicate that a percentage of

the project trips already exist on the adjacent roadways – passerby capture. Therefore, the new

daily trip ends attracted to the current FLU would be 2,147 trip ends, as shown in Table 1.

Therefore, the proposed land use would result in a net decrease of 1,567 daily trip ends, as shown

in Table 1.

Comp Plan Amendment Analysis – Caliber Collision – Lake Worth 2

Figure 1. Project Location

Comp Plan Amendment Analysis – Caliber Collision – Lake Worth 3

Table 1. Estimated Daily Project Traffic

DailyITE Trip Passerby New Daily

Land Use LUC Size Ends (1) Capture (2) Trip EndsCurrent FLU

Shopping Center 820 40,511 SF 3,253 1,106 2,147

Proposed FLULight Industrial 110 91,149 SF 452 0 452

Difference -2,801 -1,695

Proposed UseAutomobile Care Center 942 18,635 SF 580 0 580

Difference from Existing FLU -2,673 -1,567

(2) Source: ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition.

(1) Source: ITE Trip Generation, 10th Edition, 2017. LUC 942 does not have a Daily rate, therefore, the PM trips were assumed to represent 10% of the daily trips.

Comp Plan Amendment Analysis – Caliber Collision – Lake Worth 4

ESTIMATED AM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC

Again, based on data contained in the ITE Trip Generation, 10th Edition, the proposed FLU would

attract approximately 64 trip ends during the AM peak hour, as shown in Table 2. The current FLU

attracts approximately 172 trip ends during the AM peak hour.

As previously stated, studies contained in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, indicate

that a percentage of the project trips already exist on the adjacent roadways – passerby capture.

Therefore, the new AM peak hour trip ends attracted to the current FLU would be 114 trip ends.

Therefore, the proposed FLU would result in a net decrease of 50 AM peak hour trip ends, as shown

in Table 2.

ESTIMATED PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC

Again, based on data contained in the ITE Trip Generation, 10th Edition, the proposed land use

would attract approximately 58 trip ends during the PM peak hour, as shown in Table 3. The

current FLU attracts approximately 278 trip ends during the PM peak hour.

As previously stated, studies contained in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, indicate

that a percentage of the project trips already exist on the adjacent roadways – passerby capture.

Therefore, the new PM peak hour trip ends attracted to the current FLU would be 183 trip ends.

Therefore, the proposed land use would result in a net decrease of 125 PM peak hour trip ends,

as shown in Table 3.

CONCLUSION

Given that there is a reduction in the net new daily trips for the proposed FLU, no other analysis is

required.

Comp Plan Amendment Analysis – Caliber Collision – Lake Worth 5

Table 2. AM Peak Hour Project Traffic

ITELand Use LUC Size In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total

Current FLUShopping Center 820 40,511 SF 107 65 172 36 22 58 71 43 114

Proposed FLULight Industrial 110 91,149 SF 56 8 64 0 0 0 56 8 64

Difference -51 -57 -108 -15 -35 -50

Proposed UseAutomobile Care Center 942 18,635 SF 28 14 42 0 0 0 28 14 42

Difference from Current FLU -79 -51 -130 -43 -29 -72

(1) Source: ITE Trip Generation,10th Edition, 2017.

(2) Source: ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition.

Trip Ends (1)AM Peak Hour Passerby

Capture (2)New AM Peak Hour

Trip Ends

Comp Plan Amendment Analysis – Caliber Collision – Lake Worth 6

Table 3. PM Peak Hour Project Traffic

ITELand Use LUC Size In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total

Current FLUShopping Center 820 40,511 SF 133 145 278 45 50 95 88 95 183

Proposed FLULight Industrial 110 91,149 SF 7 50 57 0 0 0 7 50 57

Difference -126 -95 -221 -81 -45 -126

Proposed UseAutomobile Care Center 942 18,635 SF 28 30 58 0 0 0 28 30 58

Difference from Current FLU -105 -115 -220 -60 -65 -125

(1) Source: ITE Trip Generation,10th Edition, 2017.

(2) Source: ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition.

Trip Ends (1)PM Peak Hour Passerby

Capture (2)New PM Peak Hour

Trip Ends

APPENDIX

APPENDIX CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN

(1

t I ~

---l"S, I

I

~-

LOCATION MAP

SITE DATA:-------------~

AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL

ADDRESS: 5910 S HAVERHILL ROAD

PARCEL NUMBERS: 00-42-44-35-24-002--0000

LOT SIZE: 4.6 ACRES CALIBER LOT SIZE PROPOSED:+/- 3.4 ACRES (1.2 ACRES REMAINING - CANNOT BE DEVELOPEDO

ZONING: RS TO BE REZONED TO CG REQUIRED COMPREHENSIVE USE PLAN AMENDMENT

BUILDING BREAKOUT: OFFICE SQ. FT. SHOP FLOOR SQ, FT. TOTAL BUILDING SQ. FT. PARKING CALCULATIONS

REQUIRED OFFICE AT 1 :300 SHOP AT 1 PER BAY/EMPLOYEE TOTAL REQUIRED:

PROVIDED

=2,175 = 16,460 =18,635

7 30 37

TOTAL OFFICE (FRONT) 24 TOTAL PARKINGISTAGING 79 TOTAL OVERALL PARKING 103

SITE & BUILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS TABLE 3.B.9.F-PBIAO

FRONT SO'CG SIDE 15' SIDE (STREET) 25' REAR 50'

Issued: Date: A ISSUED FOR PERMITS xx-xx-xx

B

c D Revisions: Date:

2 3 4

5

6

N

CD 50 100 150

SCALE: 1" = 50'

Scott K Stannard, P .E.

FL No. 50565 SEAL

Site Engineering • Larydscape Architects

Commercial Site Solutions, Inc.

21764 State Road 54 Lutz, FL 33549 (813) 885-2032

www.css-eng.com

CROSS DEVELOPMENT

4336 MARSH RlDGE CARROLLTON, 1X 75010

EH: (214) 614 - 8252 CONTACT: RUSTYCOAN,P.E.

Client Name:

CALIBER COLLISION

SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HAVERHILL ROAD AND

NASHlRAIL LAKE WORTII, FL 33463

Project Name & Location:

OVERALL SITE PLAN

Drawing Name:

Drawing No.

Date: 06/13/18

Revised:

C-3.0 Drawn: hsm

Checked: SKS

APPENDIX TRIP GENERATION – CURRENT AND PROPOSED FLU

�������� ��� �����

��������������������������������������������� ���������!""������ �"!#��#��"� ���

$%&'()*) +&,- . /"0�1234-56 +&,- . 7"08� 7�00��� 9 :;< +3 .=&6-. ��������� >*6(.?6&6-@123A*%5-. B*C@13)6&' >3D-.>3E%62(. >'*-%6 +&,-.$%&'()6F) +&,-. GD*6*3%. HIJ9IKL ���� J����M&%D N)- O%D-C-%D-%6P&2*&Q'- ?*R- S*,- 1-2*3D T-6U3D G%62( GV*6 S36&'��� 9 W������ 7����XK���"0<8"��W�8�8"�Y ���� WZ� :�� K;[ !���� \��]�"� �̂�� :� X;_KY ;�XIY � �� �;�X̀Ya���� � �� ��b � � ��b c��c��� 9 K���"0 ;���H�����"0 XK���"0<8"��W�8�8"�Y ���� WZ� :�� K:[ ����� \��]�"� [��"�� !�� �� ��b �� ��b !��M&%D N)- G%62(d-DE56*3% $D4E)6-D G%62( GV*6 d-DE56*3% $D4E)6-D GV*6��� 9 W������ 7���� � b � �� � b � � ��� 9 K���"0 ;��� H�����"0 � b �� � b �� efg h ?U3CC*%i >-%6-2 jjg h k-%-2&' M*iU6 O%DE)62*&'GV*6 � � /�l"�� Jm�� � b X�Y "̂0"����� � /�l"�� J���� � b X�Y G%62( �� G%62( � �� /�l"�� J���� � b X�Y "̂0"����� � /�l"�� Jm�� � b X�Y GV*6 �� efg h ?U3CC*%i >-%6-2S36&' S2*C) O%6-2%&' S2*C) GV6-2%&' S2*C)jjg h k-%-2&' M*iU6O%DE)62*&' S36&'G%62( � �� X���bY � X�bY � X�bY � �� X���bYGV*6 � � X���bY � X�bY � X�bY � � X���bYS36&' c��c X���bY � X�bY � X�bY c��c X���bY jjg h k-%-2&' M*iU6 O%DE)62*&'S36&' S2*C) O%6-2%&' S2*C) GV6-2%&' S2*C)efg h ?U3CC*%i>-%6-2 S36&'

1GdOn= ?GSSO+k

Sd$ooO> dG=N>SOn+?O+SGd+$M SdO1?

�������� ��� �����

��������������������������������������������� ���������!""������ �"!#��#��"� ���

$%&'( �� )���*+ � )�*+ � )�*+ �� )���*+$,-& �� )���*+ � )�*+ � )�*+ �� )���*+./&01 !�� )���*+ � )�*+ � )�*+ !�� )���*+ 20%3 456 $,&6'%01 .'-75 80559:(; 80559:( .'-75 </%970559:(.'-75��� = >������ ?���� @��@ @! ��� ��!���� = A���"B C��� D�����"B !�� � � !��E66F30(C"����� G� ���"���� #�H DIJ� K������ ��� = A���"B C��� D�����"B )A���"B LM"��>�M�M"�+I�� ������ H����� )N��"��+ � ��� ���HH����� M� DIJ� DIJ ���HH���� CDG M"��� �� ��� ������ JO���"B I�� ��� = >������ ?���� )A���"B LM"��>�M�M"�+DIJ ���� ��� ���HH��� " �"���B" �"��=M�* #� ��� �"��� ��� = A���"B C��� D�����"B )A���"B LM"��>�M�M"�+DIJ ���� ��� ���HH��� " �"���B" �"��=M�* #� ��� �"��� ./&01 $%&6'-%P ���@./&01 $,-&-%P ����./&01 $%&6'-%P Q63RS&-/% �./&01 $,-&-%P Q63RS&-/% �./&01 $%&6'-%P T%&6'%01 U07&R'6 Q63RS&-/% �./&01 $,-&-%P T%&6'%01 U07&R'6 Q63RS&-/% �./&01 $%&6'-%P 80559:( Q63RS&-/% ��@./&01 $,-&-%P 80559:( Q63RS&-/% ��@./&01 $%&6'-%P </%980559:( .'-75 �@��./&01 $,-&-%P </%980559:( .'-75 ����

$V.$Q<W2 .QT8XT.$ Y$ZTW.T[< Y$.WT2X

X4\\WQ]

�������� ��� �����

���������������������������������������������� ��!"#$��"�#$������!"����#�%� ��

&'()*+,+ -(./ 0 12 ��%3 4��5678/9: -(./ 0 ;%<$� ;�<<��� = >?@ -7 0A(:/0 ��������� B,:*0C:(:/D567E,'9/0 F,GD57+:() B7H/0B7I':6*0 B),/': -(./0&'()*+:J+ -(./0 KH,:,7'0 LMN=MO2 ���� N����P('H Q+/ R'H/G/'H/':S(6,(T)/ C,U/ V,./ 5/6,7H W/:X7H K':6* KY,: V7:()��� = Z������ ;����[O���%<@$%��Z�$�$%�\ ���� Z]� >�� O?1 #���� ^��3�%�_ ��%34�� �" 1��%����Z���� M%""�_�̀� 4��a������ � %�� �%�b� a��� >� [?Lc\ M � ��� [d\e������ ��� !�f !� �f ������ = O���%< ?���L�����%< [O���%<@$%��Z�$�$%�\ ���� Z]� >�� O>1 ����� ^��3�%�_ ��%34�� �" 1��%����Z���� M%""�_�̀� 4��a������ � %�� �%�b� 1��%�� ��� �! ��f � ��f !#P('H Q+/ K':6*g/HI9:,7' &H8I+:/H K':6* KY,: g/HI9:,7' &H8I+:/H KY,:��� = Z������ ;���� � f ��� � f !���� = O���%< ?��� L�����%< � f �! � f �hij k CX7GG,'l B/':/6 mmj k n/'/6() P,lX: R'HI+:6,()KY,: !� o�b%�� Np�� � f [�\ a%<%����� � o�b%�� N���� � f [�\ K':6* �!K':6* ��� o�b%�� N���� � f [�\ a%<%����� � o�b%�� Np�� � f [�\ KY,: �hij k CX7GG,'l B/':/6V7:() V6,G+ R':/6'() V6,G+ KY:/6'() V6,G+mmj k n/'/6() P,lX:R'HI+:6,() V7:()K':6* ��� [���f\ � [�f\ � [�f\ ��� [���f\KY,: !� [���f\ � [�f\ � [�f\ !� [���f\V7:() ��� [���f\ � [�f\ � [�f\ ��� [���f\

5KgRqA CKVVR-n

Vg&rrRB gKAQBVRq-CR-VKg-&P VgR5C

�������� ��� �����

���������������������������������������������� ��!"#$��"�#$������!"����#�%� ��

&&' ( )*+*,-. /0123 4+5673,0-.893-. 8,0:7 4+3*,+-. 8,0:7 ;<3*,+-. 8,0:7=>' ( ?29::0+1 @*+3*,893-.;+3,A �! B���CD � B�CD � B�CD �! B���CD;<03 � B���CD � B�CD � B�CD � B���CD893-. !# B���CD � B�CD � B�CD !# B���CD /-+5 E7* ;<3*,+-. 8,0:7 F-77(GAH F-77(GA 8,0:7 I9+(:-77(GA8,0:7��� J K������ L���� ��� # �� ��#��� J M���%N O��� P�����%N !# � � !#Q**R5-AS F*-R T96, 9U V5W-X*+3 ?3,**3 8,-UU0XS Y+* T96, Z*3[**+ \ -+5 ] -̂_^O%����� �̀ ���%���� "�a Pbc� d������ ��� J M���%N O��� P�����%N BM���%N e$%��K�$�$%�Db�� ������ a����� Bf��%��D � ��� ���aa����� $� Pbc� Pbc ���aa���� OgM $%��� �� ��������� ch���%N b�� ��� J K������ L���� BM���%N e$%��K�$�$%�DPbc ���� ��� ���aa��� % �%���N% �%��J$�C "� ��� �%��� ��� J M���%N O��� P�����%N BM���%N e$%��K�$�$%�DPbc ���� ��� ���aa��� % �%���N% �%��J$�C "� ��� �%��� 893-. ;+3*,0+1 �! 893-. ;<030+1 � 893-. ;+3*,0+1 i*56X309+ �893-. ;<030+1 i*56X309+ �893-. ;+3*,0+1 4+3*,+-. @-:36,* i*56X309+ �893-. ;<030+1 4+3*,+-. @-:36,* i*56X309+ �893-. ;+3*,0+1 F-77(GA i*56X309+ !893-. ;<030+1 F-77(GA i*56X309+ ��893-. ;+3*,0+1 I9+(F-77(GA 8,0:7 ���893-. ;<030+1 I9+(F-77(GA 8,0:7 ��

;j8;iIV/ 8i4F?48; k;l4V84YI k;8V4/?

?EmmVin

�������� ��� �����

���������������������������������������������� ��!"#$��"�#$������!"����#�%� �

�������� ��� �����

���������������������������������������������������� !���"#�#�#� ���!��"�! ���

$%&'()*) +&,- . �/ ��01 2��3456-78 +&,- . 90:#� 9�::��� ; <=> +5 .?&8-. ��������� @*8(.A8&8-B345C*%7-. D*EB35)8&' @5F-.@5G%84(. @'*-%8 +&,-.$%&'()8H) +&,-. IF*8*5%. JKL;KM/ ���� L����N&%F O)- P%F-E-%F-%8Q&4*&R'- A*S- T*,- 3-4*5F U-8V5F I%84( IW*8 T58&'��� ; X������ 9����YM���0:>#0��X�#�#0�Z ���� X[� <�� M=\ !���� ]��1�0�̂ ��012�� �" \��0����X���� K0""�̂_�� 2���̀����� ! 0�� a��b� �̀�� <� Y=_MZ =�YKZ � ���!=�YcZd���� � !�e �!� ��e ������ ; M���0: =���J�����0: YM���0:>#0��X�#�#0�Z ���� X[� <�� M<\ ����� ]��1�0�̂ ��012�� �" \��0����X���� K0""�̂_�� 2���̀����� ! 0�� a��b� \��0�� ��a � ��e �� ��e ��N&%F O)- I%84(f-FG78*5% $F6G)8-F I%84( IW*8 f-FG78*5% $F6G)8-F IW*8��� ; X������ 9���� � e � � e �!���� ; M���0: =��� J�����0: � e � � e ��ghi j AV5EE*%k @-%8-4 lli j m-%-4&' N*kV8 P%FG)84*&'IW*8 �!� n�b0�� Lo�� � e Y�Z 0̀:0����� � n�b0�� L���� � e Y�Z I%84( �I%84( � n�b0�� L���� � e Y�Z 0̀:0����� � n�b0�� Lo�� � e Y�Z IW*8 ��ghi j AV5EE*%k @-%8-4T58&' T4*E) P%8-4%&' T4*E) IW8-4%&' T4*E)lli j m-%-4&' N*kV8P%FG)84*&' T58&'I%84( � Y���eZ � Y�eZ � Y�eZ � Y���eZIW*8 �!� Y���eZ � Y�eZ � Y�eZ �!� Y���eZT58&' ��� Y���eZ � Y�eZ � Y�eZ ��� Y���eZ

3IfPp? AITTP+m

Tf$qqP@ fI?O@TPp+AP+TIf+$N TfP3A

�������� ��� �����

���������������������������������������������������� !���"#�#�#� ���!��"�! ���

$$% & '()(*+, -./01 2)3451*.+,671+, 6*.85 2)1(*)+, 6*.85 9:1(*)+, 6*.85;<% & =0788.)/ >()1(*671+,9)1*? � @���AB � @�AB � @�AB � @���AB9:.1 �� @���AB � @�AB � @�AB �� @���AB671+, �� @���AB � @�AB � @�AB �� @���AB -+)3 C5( 9:1(*)+, 6*.85 D+55&E?F D+55&E? 6*.85 G7)&8+55&E?6*.85��� H I������ J���� ��� ! �� �� ��� H K���LM N��� O�����LM �� � � ��P((Q3+?R D(+Q S74* 7T U3V+W()1 =1*((1 6*+TT.WR X)( S74* Y(1Z(() [ +)3 \ 8]̂]NL����� _� ���L���� "�̀ Oab� c������ ��� H K���LM N��� O�����LM @K���LM d#L��I�#�#L�Ba�� ������ ̀����� @e��L��B � ��� ���̀ �̀���� #� Oab� Oab ���̀ �̀��� NfK #L��� �� ��������� bg���LM a�� ��� H K���LM N��� O�����LM @K���LM d#L��I�#�#L�BOab ���� ��� ���̀ �̀�� L �L���ML �L��H#�A "� ��� �L��� 671+, 9)1(*.)/ �!�671+, 9:.1.)/ ���671+, 9)1(*.)/ h(34W1.7) �671+, 9:.1.)/ h(34W1.7) �671+, 9)1(*.)/ 2)1(*)+, >+814*( h(34W1.7) �671+, 9:.1.)/ 2)1(*)+, >+814*( h(34W1.7) �671+, 9)1(*.)/ D+55&E? h(34W1.7) !�671+, 9:.1.)/ D+55&E? h(34W1.7) ��671+, 9)1(*.)/ G7)&D+55&E? 6*.85 ��671+, 9:.1.)/ G7)&D+55&E? 6*.85 �!�

9i69hGU- 6h2D=269 j9k2U62XG j96U2-=

=CllUhm

APPENDIX TRIP GENERATION – PROPOSED USE

Analysis Name : AM Peak HourProject Name : Caliber Collision - Lake Worth No :Date: 1/5/2018 City:State/Province: Zip/Postal Code:Country: Client Name:Analyst's Name: Edition: ITE-TGM 10th Edition

Land Use IndependentVariable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total

942 - Automobile CareCenter (GeneralUrban/Suburban)

1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 18.64 Weekday, PeakHour of AdjacentStreet Traffic,One HourBetween 7 and 9a.m.

Average 2.25

28 67%

14 33%

42

Land Use EntryReduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit

942 - Automobile Care Center 0 % 28 0 % 14

Land Use External Trips Pass-by% Pass-by Trips Non-pass-byTrips

942 - Automobile Care Center 42 0 0 42

Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.Landuse No deviations from ITE.

Methods No deviations from ITE.

External Trips 942 - Automobile Care Center (General Urban/Suburban)

ITE does not recommend a particular pass-by% for this case.

PERIOD SETTING

TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS

EXTERNAL TRIPS

ITE DEVIATION DETAILS

Total Entering 28Total Exiting 14Total Entering Reduction 0Total Exiting Reduction 0Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction 0Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction 0Total Entering Pass-by Reduction 0Total Exiting Pass-by Reduction 0Total Entering Non-Pass-by Trips 28Total Exiting Non-Pass-by Trips 14

SUMMARY

Analysis Name : PM Peak HourProject Name : Caliber Collision - Lake Worth No :Date: 1/5/2018 City:State/Province: Zip/Postal Code:Country: Client Name:Analyst's Name: Edition: ITE-TGM 10th Edition

Land Use IndependentVariable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total

942 - Automobile CareCenter (GeneralUrban/Suburban)

1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 18.64 Weekday, PeakHour of AdjacentStreet Traffic,One HourBetween 4 and 6p.m.

Average 3.11

28 48%

30 52%

58

Land Use EntryReduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit

942 - Automobile Care Center 0 % 28 0 % 30

Land Use External Trips Pass-by% Pass-by Trips Non-pass-byTrips

942 - Automobile Care Center 58 0 0 58

Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.Landuse No deviations from ITE.

Methods No deviations from ITE.

External Trips 942 - Automobile Care Center (General Urban/Suburban)

ITE does not recommend a particular pass-by% for this case.

PERIOD SETTING

TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS

EXTERNAL TRIPS

ITE DEVIATION DETAILS

Total Entering 28Total Exiting 30Total Entering Reduction 0Total Exiting Reduction 0Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction 0Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction 0Total Entering Pass-by Reduction 0Total Exiting Pass-by Reduction 0Total Entering Non-Pass-by Trips 28Total Exiting Non-Pass-by Trips 30

SUMMARY

APPENDIX PASSERBY RATES

242

Table F.9 (Cont'd) Pass-By and Non-Pass-By Trips Weekday, PM Peak Period Land Use Code 820-Shopping Center

921

108

118

256

160

550

51

1,090

97

118

126

150

153

153

154

164

166

205

Albany, NY

O~erland Park, KS

Overland Park, KS

Greece, NY

Greece, NY

Greece, NY

Boca Raton, Fl

Ross Twp. PA

Upper Oubfm Twp, PA

Tredyffrin Twp, PA

Lawnside, NJ

Boca Raton. FL

Willow Grove, PA

Broward Cnty., FL

Arden, DE

Doylestown, PA

Middletown Twp, PA

Haddon Twp, NJ

Broward Cnty., FL

July &Aug. 1985

July 1988

Aug. 1988

June 1988

June 1988

June 1988

Dec. 1987

July 1988

Wmter 1988189

Winter 1988/89

Winter 1988189

Winter 1988/89

Winter 1988/89

Winter 1988/89

Winter 1988189

Winier 1988/89

Winter 1988189

Winter 1988189

Winter 1988189

196

111

123

120

78

117

110

411

4:00..{):00 p.m. 23 42 35 77

4:30-5:30 p.m. 26 61 13 74

4:30-5:30 p.m 25 55 20 75

4:00-6:00 p.m 38 62 62

4:00-6:00 p.m 29 71 71

4:00-6:00 p.m. 48 52 52

4:00-6:00 p.m. 33 34 67

2:00-8:00 p.m. 34 56 10 66

4:00-6:00 p.m. 41 59

4:00-6:00 p.m. 24 78

4:00--tl:OO p.m. 37 63

4:00-6:00 p.m. 43 57

4:00--6:00 p.m. 39 61

4:00-6:00 p.m 50 50

4:00-6:00 p.m 30 70

4:00--tl:OO p.m. 32

4:00-6:00 p.m. 67

4:00-6:00 p.m 20 80

4:00--tl:OO p.m 55 45

60.950

34,000

23.410

57,306

40,763

42.225

51,500

34,000

10,000

20,000

40,000

26,000

85,000

26,000

29.000

25,000

6,000

62,000

Raymond Keyes Assoc.

Sear Brown

Sear Brown

Sear Brown

Kimley·Hom and Assoc. Inc.

Wilbur Smith and Assoc.

McMahon Associates

BoozAllen & Hamilton

Pennoni Associates

McMahon Associates

BoozAllen & Hamilton

McMahon Assoc'lates

Orth·Rodgers & Assoc. Inc

Orth·Rodgers & Assoc. Inc.

BoozAllen & Hamilton

Pennoni Associates

McMahon Associates

Table F.9 (Cont'd) Pass-By and Non-Pass-By Trips Weekday, PM Peak Period Land Use Code 820-Shopping Center

237 Winter 1988189 4:00--tl:OO p.m. 48 W. Windsor

Twp, NJ f---- +~~~--+--~----- --"------·--· __ ,,, ---j---

Willow Grove. 242 PA Winter 1988/89 4:00-6:00 p.m 37

297 Whitehall, PA Winter 1988189 4:00--tl:OO p.m. 33

f---"-o __ +-8-"_"_'_~~cc_nty., Winte __ ,_19_8_8_18_9+-----+4-0_o_-6_,_oo_o._m_.1

44

19

PRIMARY DIVERTED

52 46.000 -+----+----·-.. --·--+-----·-j----+--

87

56

81

26,000

26.000

McMahon Associates

Orth-Rodgers & Assoc. Inc.

33,000 Wilbur Smith 370

150

Pittsburgh, ~

Portland, OR

Winter 1988189 4:00-6:00 p.m. ...... ~·-.. ·---+--~--;------r------1 ---+----+ 519

150 Portland, OR 655

780 Calgary, Alberta Oct.-Dec. 1987 15,436

Bordentown,

f---1-78--t--~NcJ _--j_A_P~-~~- ----~~·---·-144 Manalapan, NJ July 1990 176

549 Natick, MA Feb. 1989

Average Pass-By Trip Percentage: 34 "-" means no data were provided

Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition

4:00-6:00 p.m. 68 8

4:00--tl:OO p.m 85

4:00--tl:OO p.m 20 39

2:00--6:00 p.m. 35

3:30-6:15 p.m. 32 44

4:45-5:45 p.m. 33 26

26 32

28 35

41 80

25.000 K~;~f~~i~t!~d

30,000 Kittelson and Associates

City of Calgary DOT

65 37 980 Raymond

-+---j·------1---·--+.c.Kc•cY'c'cAc'o'°c'"-'· 24 68

41 87

69,347 +-----!-----

48,782

Raymond Keyes Assoc.

Raymond Keyes Assoc.

.),

·I ~

cl :A

d ~

'.'.! ~~

cl cl

'

~. I'-!

cl ..

~ l!.-1

d d . ;~

d ~