ngo’s and ci : two separate worlds
DESCRIPTION
Before 2009. Ngo’s and CI : two separate worlds Historically: a lot of ‘ad hoc’ collaborations and exchanges between NGO’s and CI’s A lot of ngo’s started as CI’s CI’s not recognized as actors in the field of international solidarity. NGO’s / CI’s. Ngo’s structural aid-programs - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
• Ngo’s and CI : two separate worlds• Historically: a lot of ‘ad hoc’ collaborations
and exchanges between NGO’s and CI’s• A lot of ngo’s started as CI’s• CI’s not recognized as actors in the field of
international solidarity.
Before 2009
Ngo’sstructural aid-programsactive on national scaleprofessionalsorganised in a federation and an ngo-platform (11.11.11)
CI’s small scale-projects local volunteers not organized
NGO’s / CI’s
A certain generation of ngo-professionals was pleased that we finally left this
small scale CI-approach behind to concentrate on a more structural approach
2007Prof. Develtere (HIVA)
identifies 4 pillars of international cooperation4th pillar = CI’s = “the socialization of development aid”
2009
“4de pijlersteunpunt” founded by the Flemish government and 11.11.11,
umbrella organization of Flemish North-South movement
website helpdesk, coaching, trainings, meetings, networking,
Vision statement adopted by the ngo’s
• CI’s recognized as an actor in international solidarity• Acknowledge the creativity and dynamism of CI’s• We are all expert in our own way• Both have strengths and weaknesses• Let’s not be competitors, but allies.• The ‘big picture’ and ‘small story’ (CI’s) are two sides of the
same story• Focus on local level: The local councils on international
solidarity in towns and cities • Recognizing CI’s does not mean that we have to appreciate all
CI-projects in the same positive way!
Not so easy• Big ngo’s not really interested. Small ngo’s are closer
to CI’s• Ngo’s have their own program: long term programs -
specific countries - specific topics.• Ngo’s lack time and human resources• Ngo’s ‘protect’ their own market• A lot of prejudices about each other
Mutual distrustNGO’s CI• lack of vision, capacity,
professionalism• old style charity • quality of the projects is
questioned• competitors on
fundraising market• ‘no harm’-approach
CI NGO’s• big and non-efficient• money gets lost in
overhead• ngo’s monopolize the
market for themselves• arrogant and looking
down on CI’s
Looking for ways to stimulate exchange
• Platform for CI to defend their interests was created 5 CI-represenatives member of the general assembly
• Getting CI’s involved in public campaigns (MDG’s, climate change, ..)
• Inviting CI’s to events, conferences, political actions,
• Joint network events
Looking for ways to stimulate exchange
• Open up the ‘expertise’ of ngo’s to CI’s • Stimulate partnership on local level (local councils
on international solidarity)• Involve CI’s in networks on actual topics (Philipines,
Central-Afrika, …)
Questions for the future:• How to get more south-south cooperation ?• Open up budgets for CI ?• Do we need an ethical code for CI’s ?