ng ki nrc public meeting on filtering strategies rulemaking · review from december 12, 2013 public...

25
Filt i St t i Rl ki Filtering Strategies Rulemaking Technical Evaluation Rick Wachowiak (EPRI): EPRI Project Manager Jeff Gabor (ERIN): Investigator Doug True (ERIN): Investigator David Luxat (ERIN): Investigator NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking April 30, 2014

Upload: others

Post on 23-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

Filt

iSt

ti

Rl

kiFi

lterin

g St

rate

gies

Rul

emak

ing

Tech

nica

l Eva

luat

ion

Ric

k W

acho

wia

k (E

PR

I): E

PR

I Pro

ject

Man

ager

Jeff

Gab

or (E

RIN

): In

vest

igat

orD

oug

True

(ER

IN):

Inve

stig

ator

Dav

id L

uxat

(ER

IN):

Inve

stig

ator

NR

C P

ublic

Mee

ting

on F

ilter

ing

Stra

tegi

es R

ulem

akin

gA

pril

30, 2

014

Page 2: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

Gen

eral

App

roac

h to

Filt

erin

g St

rate

gies

Rul

emak

ing

Tech

nica

l Ana

lysi

sy

•Bui

ld o

ff of

SE

CY

-12-

0157

met

hodo

logy

usi

ng S

OA

RC

A

refe

renc

e pl

ant

p•A

lign

assu

mpt

ions

with

NR

C a

sses

smen

t as

muc

h as

po

ssib

le•E

xplic

it an

alys

is o

f all

scen

ario

s•C

onsi

der r

isk

and

Def

ense

in D

epth

•Cos

tBen

efit

Ana

lysi

s•C

ost-B

enef

it A

naly

sis

•Add

ress

spe

ctru

m o

f sen

sitiv

ities

–In

clud

eke

ypl

ant-t

o-pl

antv

aria

bilit

yIn

clud

e ke

y pl

antt

opl

ant v

aria

bilit

y

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

Page 3: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

Rev

iew

from

Dec

embe

r 12,

201

3 Pu

blic

M

eetin

gM

eetin

g•

Gen

eral

ass

umpt

ions

–E

LAP

ass

umin

g FL

EX

per

EA

-12-

049,

EA

-13-

109,

Rev

.3 E

PG

/SA

Gs

–In

itial

RP

V p

ress

ure

cont

rol

•10

min

con

trol 8

00-1

000

psig

•1

hour

beg

in 8

0°F/

hrco

oldo

wn.

Con

trol b

etw

een

200-

400

psig

–R

CIC

suc

tion

from

poo

l with

tem

pera

ture

lim

it of

240

°F

–FL

EX

flow

of50

0gp

mat

200

psig

shut

off

FLE

X fl

ow o

f 500

gpm

at 2

00 p

sig

shut

off

–M

SL

rupt

ure

from

ME

LCO

R a

ssum

ed a

t cor

e sl

ump

–S

RV

sei

zure

from

ME

LCO

R a

ssum

ed 1

hou

r afte

r cor

e da

mag

e–

Con

tain

men

t ven

ting

•A

ntic

ipat

ory

WW

vent

at15

psig

(prio

rto

core

dam

age)

•A

ntic

ipat

ory

WW

ven

t at 1

5 ps

ig (p

rior t

o co

re d

amag

e)•

Isol

atio

n of

initi

al v

ent u

pon

entry

into

SA

MG

•U

pon

entry

into

SA

G, v

entin

g at

PS

P (3

0 ps

ig)

•U

pon

vess

el b

reac

h, v

entin

g at

PC

PL

(60

psig

)F

tli

li

i20

idt

lbd

•Fo

r ven

t cyc

ling

anal

ysis

, ass

umin

g 20

psi

dco

ntro

l ban

d–

Con

tain

men

t fai

lure

•Li

ner m

elt-t

hrou

gh•

Hea

d fla

nge

leak

age

per S

OA

RC

A

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

•U

ltim

ate

failu

re p

er C

B&

I

Page 4: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

Alte

rnat

ives

1.B

ase

Cas

e –

FLE

X in

ject

ion

to R

PV

, EA

-13-

109,

Rev

. 3 E

PG

/SA

Gs

2.R

elia

ble

mak

eup

toth

eR

PV

2.R

elia

ble

mak

eup

to th

e R

PV

2A.

Opt

ion

1 pl

us re

liabl

e m

akeu

p to

RP

V2B

.O

ptio

n 2A

plu

s W

W/D

W v

ent c

yclin

g2C

. O

ptio

n 2B

plu

s w

ater

man

agem

ent t

o pr

even

t the

nee

d fo

r DW

ven

ting

2D.

Opt

ion

2A p

lus

wat

er m

anag

emen

t to

prev

ent t

he n

eed

for D

W v

entin

g3.

Rel

iabl

e m

akeu

p to

DW

3A.

Opt

ion

1 pl

us re

liabl

e m

akeu

p to

DW

3BO

ptio

n3A

plus

WW

/DW

vent

cycl

ing

3B.

Opt

ion

3A p

lus

WW

/DW

ven

t cyc

ling

3C.

Opt

ion

3B p

lus

wat

er m

anag

emen

t to

prev

ent t

he n

eed

for D

W v

entin

g3D

.O

ptio

n 3A

plu

s w

ater

man

agem

ent t

o pr

even

t the

nee

d fo

r DW

ven

ting

4.S

mal

l Filt

er4A

.O

ptio

n 3A

plu

s sm

all f

ilter

4B.

Plan

to a

lso

addr

ess

Alte

rnat

ive

2A w

ith S

mal

l Filt

er5.

Larg

e Fi

lter

5AO

ptio

n3A

plus

larg

efil

ter

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

5A.

Opt

ion

3A p

lus

larg

e fil

ter

5B.

Plan

to a

lso

addr

ess

Alte

rnat

ive

2A w

ith L

arge

Filt

er

Page 5: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

Cor

e D

amag

e Sc

enar

io D

evel

opm

ent

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

Page 6: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

Cor

e D

amag

e To

p Ev

ents

•E

LAP

–To

tal l

oss

of o

ffsite

and

ons

ite A

C/D

C p

ower

•E

AR

LY-R

CIC

–R

CIC

ava

ilabl

e to

ope

rate

initi

ally

•FL

EX

–FL

EX

impl

emen

tatio

n su

cces

sful

for i

njec

tion

pum

p an

d D

C p

ower

for p

ress

ure

cont

rol

•W

W-V

EN

T–

Wet

wel

lven

t suc

cess

ful f

or e

xten

ded

RC

IC o

pera

tion

•D

W-V

EN

T–

Dry

wel

l ven

t suc

cess

ful f

or e

xten

ded

RC

IC o

pera

tion

•R

PV-P

RES

SO

tf

llt

lRP

Vt

td

RC

ICti

–O

pera

tors

suc

cess

fully

con

trol R

PV

pre

ssur

e to

ext

end

RC

IC o

pera

tion

•E

AR

LY-F

LEX

–Fo

r sce

nario

s w

ith fa

ilure

of E

AR

LY-R

CIC

, FLE

X im

plem

enta

tion

to p

reve

nt c

ore

dam

age

•LA

TE-F

LEX

Fors

cena

rios

with

succ

ess

ofE

AR

LYR

CIC

and

FLE

XFL

EX

impl

emen

tatio

nla

teaf

terl

oss

ofR

CIC

able

–Fo

r sce

nario

s w

ith s

ucce

ss o

f EA

RLY

-RC

IC a

nd F

LEX,

FLE

X im

plem

enta

tion

late

afte

r los

s of

RC

IC a

ble

to p

reve

nt c

ore

dam

age

•C

ON

T-IS

OL

–If

vent

ing

was

per

form

ed p

rior t

o co

re d

amag

e, th

is n

ode

addr

esse

s th

e su

cces

sful

clo

sure

of t

hat v

ent

path

upo

n en

try in

to th

e S

AG

s

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

Page 7: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

Acc

iden

t Pro

gres

sion

Eve

nt T

ree

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

Page 8: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

APE

T To

p Ev

ents

•R

PV-P

RES

S–

This

nod

e ad

dres

ses

the

pote

ntia

l for

eith

er a

n S

RV

sei

zing

ope

n or

cre

ep ru

ptur

e of

the

mai

n st

eam

line

du

ring

the

core

dam

age

phas

e of

the

acci

dent

. Th

e sp

lit fr

actio

ns w

ill b

e in

fluen

ced

by th

e en

try

cond

ition

forR

PV

pres

sure

asde

fined

byth

eco

reda

mag

est

ate

cond

ition

for R

PV

pre

ssur

e as

def

ined

by

the

core

dam

age

stat

e.•

IVR –

Sho

uld

inje

ctio

n be

pro

vide

d to

the

RP

V a

fter t

he o

nset

of c

ore

dam

age

but p

rior t

o ve

ssel

bre

ach,

ther

e is

som

e lik

elih

ood

that

ves

sel b

reac

h ca

n be

avo

ided

.•

WTR

-INJE

CT

–W

ater

inje

ctio

n in

to th

e R

PV

or i

nto

the

dryw

ell i

s co

nsid

ered

her

e. T

he in

ject

ion

is e

ither

ava

ilabl

e pr

ior

to v

esse

l bre

ach

or fo

llow

ing

vess

el b

reac

h. D

efin

ed b

y al

tern

ativ

e be

ing

cons

ider

ed.

•E

CF

–Th

is e

vent

eva

luat

es th

e po

tent

ial f

or e

arly

dry

wel

l fai

lure

as

a re

sult

of v

esse

l bre

ach

and

the

disc

harg

e of

cor

e m

ater

ial i

nto

cont

ainm

ent.

With

out w

ater

inje

ctio

n, th

e lik

elih

ood

of li

ner m

elt t

hrou

gh (L

MT)

is

jg

()

cons

ider

ed h

igh.

Thi

s no

de c

an a

lso

addr

ess

the

pote

ntia

l for

con

tain

men

t fai

lure

resu

lting

from

hig

h pr

essu

re m

elt e

ject

ion.

MC

CI

–Fo

r cas

es w

ith s

ucce

ssfu

l inj

ectio

n of

wat

er in

to c

onta

inm

ent,

this

eve

nt e

valu

ates

the

pote

ntia

l for

cor

e de

bris

que

nchi

ng, t

here

by s

topp

ing

the

mol

ten

core

con

cret

e in

tera

ctio

n.•

WW

-VE

NT

–W

etw

ellv

entin

g is

initi

ally

use

d fo

r con

tain

men

t pre

ssur

e co

ntro

l (La

ter D

W v

entin

g as

sum

ed a

fter W

W

vent

isol

atio

n pe

r SA

Gs)

•D

W-V

EN

TIf

the

wet

wel

lven

tfai

lsto

oper

ate

the

dryw

ellv

entw

illbe

used

forc

onta

inm

entp

ress

ure

cont

rol

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

–If

the

wet

wel

lven

t fai

ls to

ope

rate

, the

dry

wel

l ven

t will

be u

sed

for c

onta

inm

ent p

ress

ure

cont

rol.

Page 9: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

MA

AP5

/Win

MA

CC

SEx

ecut

ion

•E

xecu

tion

of 5

070

indi

vidu

al

MA

AP

5.0

2 an

d W

inM

AC

CS

calc

latio

nsca

lcul

atio

ns–

13 C

ore

Dam

age

ends

tate

s–

39 A

PE

T en

dsta

tes

EP

RI’s

new

“Pho

ebe”

HP

C s

yste

m

–O

vera

ll 50

7 en

dsta

tes

for

each

filte

ring

stra

tegy

–10

stra

tegi

es•

Pyt

hon

used

to c

onst

ruct

in

divi

dual

MA

AP

5 in

puts

from

C

DE

T an

d A

PE

T st

ruct

ure

Aut

omat

edtra

nsfe

rfro

mM

AA

P5

•A

utom

ated

tran

sfer

from

MA

AP

5 to

Win

MA

CC

S•

Sen

sitiv

ity ru

ns b

eing

def

ined

an

dex

ecut

edno

w

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

and

exec

uted

now

Page 10: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

Win

MA

CC

SA

naly

sis

•Cur

rent

resu

lts b

ased

on

a hi

gh-p

opul

atio

n si

te•R

ecei

ved

Pea

chB

otto

mM

AC

CS

inpu

tfro

mth

eN

RC

and

•Rec

eive

d P

each

Bot

tom

MA

CC

S in

put f

rom

the

NR

C a

nd

are

in th

e pr

oces

s of

re-ru

nnin

g al

l cal

cula

tions

–In

tere

sted

in u

nder

stan

ding

any

cha

nges

bei

ng

impl

emen

ted

by th

e N

RC

for r

ulem

akin

g an

alys

is

10©

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

Page 11: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

Bas

e C

ase

-Cor

e D

amag

e Ev

ent T

ree

Impo

rtant

Con

tribu

tors

to C

ore

Dam

age

Seq

N

ame

Des

crip

tion

Cor

e D

amag

e Ti

min

gC

D

Freq

uenc

y%

of C

DD

omin

ant C

ontri

buto

r(s)

% o

f P

DS

% o

f CD

FA

PE

T Im

plic

atio

nsFL

EX

Faile

ddu

eto

hum

aner

rors

Not

due

CD

-002

RC

IC &

Ear

ly V

entin

g S

ucce

ed, F

LEX

fails

late

, Con

t. R

e-is

olat

ed24

+ hr

s2.

29E

-07

3%O

pera

tors

fail

to d

epol

y FL

EX

in a

tim

ely

man

ner

17%

0%FL

EX

Fai

led

due

to h

uman

err

ors.

Not

due

to

lim

ited

time

FLE

X H

ardw

are

failu

res

83%

2%FL

EX

har

dwar

e un

avai

labl

e

CD

-003

RC

IC &

Ear

ly V

entin

g S

ucce

ed, F

LEX

fails

late

, WW

Ven

t N

otR

e-Is

olat

ed24

+ hr

s5.

72E

-08

0.7%

Ope

rato

rs fa

il to

dep

oly

FLE

X in

a ti

mel

y m

anne

r &

don

't re

-isol

ate

Con

t.17

%0.

12%

Mul

tiple

hum

an fa

ilure

s

FLE

X H

ardw

are

failu

res

83%

0.62

%FL

EX

har

dwar

e un

avai

labl

e

CD

-005

RC

IC L

ost o

n E

D, F

LEX

Fai

ls, C

ont.

Re-

Isol

ated

~12

hrs

1.59

E-0

72%

Ope

rato

r fai

lure

to c

ontro

l pre

ssur

e an

d de

ploy

FL

EX

100%

2%M

any

hum

an fa

ilure

s

Ope

rato

rfai

lure

toco

ntro

lpre

ssur

ede

ploy

FLE

XM

any

hum

anfa

ilure

sAN

DW

Wve

ntis

CD

-006

RC

IC L

ost o

n E

D, F

LEX

Fai

ls, W

W V

ent N

otR

e-Is

olat

ed~1

2 hr

s7.

28E

-08

0.9%

Ope

rato

r fai

lure

to c

ontro

l pre

ssur

e, d

eplo

y FL

EX

an

d cl

ose

vent

100%

1%M

any

hum

an fa

ilure

s AN

DW

W v

ent i

s O

pen

CD

-008

RC

IC &

Ear

ly D

W V

entin

g S

ucce

ed, F

LEX

fails

late

, Con

t. R

e-is

olat

ed24

+ hr

s2.

54E

-09

0.03

%O

pera

tors

fail

to d

epol

y FL

EX

in a

tim

ely

man

ner

17%

0%FL

EX

Fai

led

due

to h

uman

err

ors.

Not

due

to

lim

ited

time

FLE

X H

ardw

are

failu

res

83%

0%FL

EX

har

dwar

e un

avai

labl

e

CD

-009

RC

IC &

Ear

ly D

W V

entin

g S

ucce

ed, F

LEX

fails

late

, DW

V

ent O

pen

24+

hrs

6.35

E-1

00.

01%

Ope

rato

rs fa

il to

dep

oly

FLE

X in

a ti

mel

y m

anne

r &

don

't re

-isol

ate

Con

t.17

%0.

00%

Mul

tiple

hum

an fa

ilure

s

FLE

X H

ardw

are

failu

res

83%

0.01

%FL

EX

har

dwar

e un

avai

labl

eO

pera

torf

ailu

reto

cont

rolp

ress

ure

and

depl

oyC

D-0

11R

CIC

Los

t on

ED, F

LEX

Fai

ls, D

W V

ent R

e-Is

olat

ed~1

2 hr

s1.

76E

-09

0.02

%O

pera

tor f

ailu

re to

con

trol p

ress

ure

and

depl

oy

FLE

X10

0%0%

Man

y hu

man

failu

res

CD

-012

RC

IC L

ost o

n E

D, F

LEX

Fai

ls, D

W V

ent N

otR

e-Is

olat

ed~1

2 hr

s8.

08E

-10

0.01

%O

pera

tor f

ailu

re to

con

trol p

ress

ure,

dep

loy

FLE

X

and

clos

e D

W v

ent

100%

0%M

any

hum

an fa

ilure

s A

ND

DW

ven

t is

Ope

nC

D-0

14R

CIC

Ear

ly, C

ont.

Not

Ven

ted,

RC

IC L

ost o

n S

P-T

24+

hrs

1.30

E-0

80.

2%O

pera

tor f

ailu

re to

con

trol S

P-T

100%

0%S

ingl

e hu

man

failu

re

CD

-016

RC

IC S

ucce

eds

Ear

ly (0

-6 h

rs),

FLE

X S

ucce

eds,

No

Ven

ting,

ED

~12

hrs

1.97

E-0

73%

Ope

rato

rs fa

il to

ven

t10

0%3%

Ope

rato

rs fa

il to

ear

ly v

ent.

CD

-017

RC

IC S

ucce

eds

Ear

ly (0

-6 h

rs),

FLE

X L

ate/

Una

vail

~8 h

rs1.

7E-0

6/yr

22%

Ope

rato

rs F

ail t

o D

eplo

y FL

EX

100%

22%

Hum

an e

rror

s w

ith F

LEX

(due

to P

SFs

ot

her t

han

time

avai

l)

CD

-019

RC

IC F

ails

Ear

ly, O

pera

tor E

D, F

LEX

Lat

e/U

nava

il~1

hr

2.5E

-06/

yr33

%R

CIC

Fai

ls b

efor

e FL

EX

can

be

depl

oyed

90%

30%

Non

e. N

o pr

eced

ing

hum

an fa

ilure

s.

Ope

rato

rs F

ail t

o D

eplo

y w

ithin

Ava

ilabl

e Ti

me

10%

3%FL

EX

Fai

led

due

to h

uman

err

ors,

but

due

to

lim

ited

time

CD

-020

RC

IC F

ails

Ear

ly, N

o ED

, FLE

X in

effe

ctiv

e~1

hr

2.75

E-0

636

%R

CIC

Har

dwar

e Fa

ilure

s &

SO

RV

, Ope

rato

r fai

ls

to E

D60

%21

%N

one.

Pre

cedi

ng h

uman

failu

re to

de

pres

suriz

e R

PV

.O

ther

haz

ard-

indu

ced

failu

res

(e.g

., lo

ss o

f DC

)40

%14

%M

itiga

ting

actio

ns n

ot fe

asib

le?

11©

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

Pre

limin

ary

resu

lts

Page 12: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

Scen

ario

Tim

ing

24+

hrs

4%~1

2 hr

s6%

~8 h

rs22

%22

%

~1hr

1 hr

68%

12©

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

Pre

limin

ary

resu

lts

Page 13: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

Con

trib

utor

s to

Cor

e D

amag

e

Hum

an E

rrors

Res

ultin

g fro

m L

imite

d Ti

me

3%Lo

ss o

f D

C/In

frast

ruct

ure

14%

Hum

an E

rrors

Not

Ass

ocia

ted

with

Lim

ited

Tim

e45

%

Failu

res

of F

LEX

E

quip

men

t3%

Failu

res

of In

stal

led

Pla

nt E

quip

men

t in

Pha

se 1

51%

13©

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

Pre

limin

ary

resu

lts

Page 14: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

Bas

e C

ase

–A

PET

Res

ults

Res

ults

End

stat

e In

terp

reta

tion

Ves

sel

Ves

sel

Dep

ress

M

ode

CD

-002

CD

-003

CD

-005

CD

-006

CD

-008

CD

-009

CD

-011

CD

-012

CD

-014

CD

-016

CD

-017

CD

-019

CD

-020

Tota

lsM

SL

4.01

E-0

91.

00E

-09

1.13

E-0

85.

16E

-09

4.44

E-1

11.

11E

-11

1.25

E-1

05.

73E

-11

9.23

E-1

02.

66E

-08

1.21

E-0

70.

00E

+00

3.71

E-0

75.

41E

-07

7%S

RV

2.22

E-0

75.

55E

-08

1.39

E-0

76.

38E

-08

2.46

E-0

96.

16E

-10

1.55

E-0

97.

08E

-10

1.14

E-0

81.

51E

-07

1.49

E-0

62.

54E

-06

2.10

E-0

66.

79E

-06

88%

HP

2.97

E-0

97.

42E

-10

8.35

E-0

93.

82E

-09

3.29

E-1

18.

23E

-12

9.26

E-1

14.

24E

-11

6.84

E-1

01.

97E

-08

8.94

E-0

80.

00E

+00

2.75

E-0

74.

01E

-07

5%In

-Ves

sel

Ret

entio

nR

eten

tion IV

R2.

37E

-08

5.92

E-0

94.

65E

-08

2.13

E-0

82.

63E

-10

7.16

E-1

15.

16E

-10

2.37

E-1

03.

81E

-09

0.00

E+0

00.

00E

+00

8.90

E-0

82.

49E

-07

4.40

E-0

76%

MC

CI M

IN1.

86E

-09

4.65

E-1

01.

07E

-08

4.88

E-0

92.

07E

-11

5.11

E-1

21.

18E

-10

5.42

E-1

18.

73E

-10

0.00

E+0

00.

00E

+00

0.00

E+0

00.

00E

+00

1.89

E-0

80%

EX

T1.

86E

-09

4.65

E-1

01.

07E

-08

4.88

E-0

92.

07E

-11

5.11

E-1

21.

18E

-10

5.42

E-1

18.

73E

-10

0.00

E+0

00.

00E

+00

0.00

E+0

00.

00E

+00

1.89

E-0

80%

DR

Y2.

02E

-07

5.04

E-0

89.

10E

-08

4.17

E-0

82.

24E

-09

5.53

E-1

01.

01E

-09

4.63

E-1

07.

46E

-09

1.97

E-0

71.

70E

-06

2.45

E-0

62.

50E

-06

7.25

E-0

694

%R

elea

se

Pat

hway

Pat

hway W

W2.

57E

-08

6.85

E-0

96.

37E

-08

2.92

E-0

82.

85E

-10

8.18

E-1

17.

53E

-10

3.24

E-1

05.

22E

-09

0.00

E+0

00.

00E

+00

8.36

E-0

82.

22E

-07

4.37

E-0

76%

DW

7.80

E-1

00.

00E

+00

1.93

E-0

98.

86E

-10

8.66

E-1

20.

00E

+00

0.00

E+0

09.

83E

-12

1.58

E-1

00.

00E

+00

0.00

E+0

02.

54E

-09

1.26

E-0

81.

89E

-08

0%O

P9.

01E

-10

0.00

E+0

02.

23E

-09

1.02

E-0

91.

00E

-11

0.00

E+0

00.

00E

+00

1.14

E-1

11.

83E

-10

0.00

E+0

00.

00E

+00

2.93

E-0

91.

45E

-08

2.18

E-0

80%

LMT

2.02

E-0

75.

04E

-08

9.10

E-0

84.

17E

-08

2.24

E-0

95.

53E

-10

1.01

E-0

94.

63E

-10

7.46

E-0

91.

97E

-07

1.70

E-0

62.

45E

-06

2.50

E-0

67.

25E

-06

94%

Con

tain

men

t Per

form

ance

CC

FP0.

880.

880.

590.

590.

880.

870.

570.

590.

591.

001.

000.

970.

910.

94

14©

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

Pre

limin

ary

resu

lts

Page 15: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

Alte

rnat

ive

2A –

Rel

iabl

e M

akeu

p to

RPV

Impo

rtant

Con

tribu

tors

to C

ore

Dam

age

Seq

C

ore

Dam

age

CD

%

of

Nam

eD

escr

iptio

nTi

min

gFr

eque

ncy

% o

f CD

Dom

inan

t Con

tribu

tor(

s)P

DS

% o

f CD

F

CD

-002

RC

IC &

Ear

ly V

entin

g S

ucce

ed, F

LEX

fails

late

, Con

t. R

e-is

olat

ed24

+ hr

s2.

29E

-07

3%O

pera

tors

fail

to d

epol

y FL

EX

in a

tim

ely

man

ner

17%

0%

FLE

X H

ardw

are

failu

res

83%

2%

CD

-003

RC

IC &

Ear

ly V

entin

g S

ucce

ed, F

LEX

fails

late

, WW

Ven

t Not

Re-

Isol

ated

24+

hrs

5.72

E-0

80.

7%O

pera

tors

fail

to d

epol

y FL

EX

in a

tim

ely

man

ner &

do

n't r

e-is

olat

e C

ont.

17%

0.12

%

FLE

X H

ardw

are

failu

res

83%

0.62

%O

tf

ilt

tl

dd

lC

D-0

05R

CIC

Los

t on

ED

, FLE

X F

ails

, Con

t. R

e-Is

olat

ed~1

2 hr

s1.

59E

-07

2%O

pera

tor f

ailu

re to

con

trol p

ress

ure

and

depl

oy

FLE

X10

0%2%

CD

-006

RC

IC L

ost o

n E

D, F

LEX

Fai

ls, W

W V

ent N

otR

e-Is

olat

ed~1

2 hr

s7.

28E

-08

0.9%

Ope

rato

r fai

lure

to c

ontro

l pre

ssur

e, d

eplo

y FL

EX

an

d cl

ose

vent

100%

1%

CD

-008

RC

IC &

Ear

ly D

W V

entin

g S

ucce

ed, F

LEX

fails

late

, Con

t. R

e-is

olat

ed24

+ hr

s2.

54E

-09

0.03

%O

pera

tors

fail

to d

epol

y FL

EX

in a

tim

ely

man

ner

17%

0%

FLE

X H

ardw

are

failu

res

83%

0%

RC

IC&

El

DW

Vti

Sd

FLE

Xf

ill

tD

WV

t24

+hr

s6

35E

100

01%

Ope

rato

rs fa

il to

dep

oly

FLE

X in

a ti

mel

y m

anne

r &

17%

000

%C

D-0

09R

CIC

& E

arly

DW

Ven

ting

Suc

ceed

, FLE

X fa

ils la

te, D

W V

ent

Ope

n24

+ hr

s6.

35E

-10

0.01

%do

n't r

e-is

olat

e C

ont.

17%

0.00

%

FLE

X H

ardw

are

failu

res

83%

0.01

%

CD

-011

RC

IC L

ost o

n E

D, F

LEX

Fai

ls, D

W V

ent R

e-Is

olat

ed~1

2 hr

s1.

76E

-09

0.02

%O

pera

tor f

ailu

re to

con

trol p

ress

ure

and

depl

oy

FLE

X10

0%0%

CD

-012

RC

IC L

ost o

n E

D, F

LEX

Fai

ls, D

W V

ent N

otR

e-Is

olat

ed~1

2 hr

s8.

08E

-10

0.01

%O

pera

tor f

ailu

re to

con

trol p

ress

ure,

dep

loy

FLE

X

and

clos

e D

W v

ent

100%

0%

CD

-014

RC

IC E

arly

, Con

t. N

ot V

ente

d, R

CIC

Los

t on

SP

-T24

+ hr

s1.

30E

-08

0.2%

Ope

rato

r fai

lure

to c

ontro

l SP

-T10

0%0%

CD

-016

RC

IC S

ucce

eds

Ear

ly (0

-6 h

rs),

FLE

X S

ucce

eds,

No

Ven

ting,

E

D~1

2 hr

s1.

97E

-07

3%O

pera

tors

fail

to v

ent

100%

3%

CD

-017

RC

IC S

ucce

eds

Ear

ly (0

-6 h

rs),

FLE

X L

ate/

Una

vail

~8 h

rs1.

7E-0

6/yr

22%

Ope

rato

rs F

ail t

o D

eplo

y FL

EX

100%

22%

CD

-019

RC

IC F

ails

Ear

ly, O

pera

tor E

D, F

LEX

Lat

e/U

nava

il~1

hr

2.5E

-06/

yr33

%R

CIC

Fai

ls b

efor

e FL

EX

can

be

depl

oyed

90%

30%

Ope

rato

rs F

ail t

o D

eplo

y w

ithin

Ava

ilabl

e Ti

me

10%

3%

~1hr

275

E-0

636

%R

CIC

Har

dwar

e Fa

ilure

s &

SO

RV

, Ope

rato

r fai

ls to

60

%21

%

15©

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

CD

-020

RC

IC F

ails

Ear

ly, N

o E

D, F

LEX

inef

fect

ive

~1 h

r2.

75E

-06

36%

ED

60%

21%

Oth

er h

azar

d-in

duce

d fa

ilure

s (e

.g.,

loss

of D

C)

40%

14%

Pre

limin

ary

resu

lts

Page 16: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

Filte

ring

Stra

tegi

es R

ulem

akin

g Fi

gure

sof

Mer

itFi

gure

s of

Mer

it•M

argi

n to

LC

F S

afet

y G

oal

•Mar

gin

toIE

FS

afet

yG

oal

•Mar

gin

to IE

F S

afet

y G

oal

•Max

Ave

rted

Cos

t•N

etC

ost-b

enef

itN

et C

ostb

enef

it•C

ondi

tiona

l Con

tain

men

t Fai

lure

Pro

babi

lity

(CC

FP)

16©

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

Page 17: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

1.0

Con

ditio

nal C

onta

inm

ent F

ailu

re P

roba

bilit

y (E

LAP)

0.8

0.9

0.6

0.7

0.4

0.5

0.2

0.3

0.0

0.1

Bas

e 2A

-RP

V

2B -

2C -

2D -

3A -

DW

3B

-D

W 3

C -

DW

3D

-D

W

4 -3

A 5

-3A

17©

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

Cas

eM

UR

PV

w

/VC

RPV

w

/VC

&

WM

RPV

w

/WM

MU

w/V

Cw

/VC

&

WM

w/W

Mw

/Sm

Fi

lter

w/L

g Fi

lter

Pre

limin

ary

resu

lts

Page 18: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

1R

isk

Rel

ativ

e to

the

Bas

e C

ase

0.8

0.9

LCF

Ris

k

IEF

Ris

k

0.6

0.7

0.4

0.5

0.2

0.3 0

0.1

Bas

e C

2A-R

PV

M

U2B

-R

PV2C

-R

PV2D

-R

PV3A

-D

W

MU

3B -

DW

/V

C3C

-D

W

/VC

&3D

-D

W

/WM

4 -3

A /S

5 -3

A /L

18©

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

Cas

eM

UR

PV

w/V

CR

PV

w/V

C &

W

M

RPV

w

/WM

MU

w/V

Cw

/VC

&

WM

w/W

Mw

/Sm

Fi

lter

w/L

g Fi

lter

Pre

limin

ary

resu

lts

Page 19: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

1R

isk

Rel

ativ

e to

the

Bas

e C

ase

0.8

0.9

LCF

Ris

k

IEF

Ris

k

0.6

0.7

04

0.5

06

02

0.3

0.4

0.1

0.2

19©

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

0B

ase

Cas

eB

ase

Cas

e w

/Lg

Filte

r3A

-D

W M

U4

-3A

w/S

m

Filte

r5

-3A

w/L

g Fi

lter

Pre

limin

ary

resu

lts

Page 20: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

100%

Cor

e D

ebris

Loc

atio

n

80%

90%

Ex-

Vess

el

In-V

esse

l

60%

70%

40%

50%

20%

30% 0%10%

Bas

e 2A

-RP

V

2B -

2C -

2D -

3A -

DW

3B

-D

W 3

C -

DW

3D

-D

W

4 -3

A 5

-3A

20©

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

Cas

eM

UR

PV

w

/VC

RPV

w

/VC

&

WM

RPV

w

/WM

MU

w/V

Cw

/VC

&

WM

w/W

Mw

/Sm

Fi

lter

w/L

g Fi

lter

Pre

limin

ary

resu

lts

Page 21: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

100%

Cor

e D

ebris

Loc

atio

n

80%

90%

Ex-

Vess

el V

ente

d

Ex-

Vess

el O

verp

ress

ure

Ex-

Vess

el L

iner

Mel

t

60%

70%

Deb

ris In

-Ves

sel

40%

50%

20%

30% 0%10%

Bas

e 2A

-RP

V

2B -

2C -

2D -

3A -

DW

3B

-D

W 3

C -

DW

3D

-D

W

4 -3

A 5

-3A

21©

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

Cas

eM

UR

PV

w

/VC

RPV

w

/VC

&

WM

RPV

w

/WM

MU

w/V

Cw

/VC

&

WM

w/W

Mw

/Sm

Fi

lter

w/L

g Fi

lter

Pre

limin

ary

resu

lts

Page 22: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

1.0

MA

CR

Rel

ativ

e to

Bas

e C

ase

0.8

0.9

0.6

0.7

0.4

0.5

0.2

0.3

0.0

0.1

Bas

e 2A

-RP

V

2B -

2C -

2D -

3A -

DW

3B

-D

W 3

C -

DW

3D

-D

W

4 -3

A 5

-3A

22©

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

Cas

eM

UR

PV

w

/VC

RPV

w

/VC

&

WM

RPV

w

/WM

MU

w/V

Cw

/VC

&

WM

w/W

Mw

/Sm

Fi

lter

w/L

g Fi

lter

Pre

limin

ary

resu

lts

Page 23: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

Nex

t Ste

ps

•Ana

lyze

con

sequ

ence

s us

ing

NR

C-p

rovi

ded

Pea

ch B

otto

m

site

inpu

tsi

te in

put

•Run

com

plet

e an

alys

is fo

r Mar

k II

plan

t•S

ensi

tivity

ana

lysi

s

23©

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

Page 24: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

Filte

ring

Stra

tegi

es R

ulem

akin

g Se

nsiti

vitie

s

Logi

cM

odel

Phen

omen

olog

ical

Cos

t-ben

efit

Logi

c M

odel

•E

LAP

freq

uenc

y•

FLE

X e

quip

men

t re

liabi

lity

Phen

omen

olog

ical

•M

SL

rupt

ure/

SR

V

seiz

ure

Cos

t-ben

efit

•$/

pers

on-re

m•

Dis

coun

trat

ere

liabi

lity

•H

uman

err

or ra

tes

for

–FL

EX

Wat

erin

ject

ion

•In

-ves

sel r

eten

tion

•D

egre

e of

CC

I•

DW

she

ll fa

ilure

Dis

coun

t rat

e

–W

ater

inje

ctio

n–

Effe

ctiv

e w

ater

m

anag

emen

tV

entc

ontro

l

se

au

e

–V

ent c

ontro

l•

Ven

t con

trol d

urin

g in

-ve

ssel

pha

se (i

.e.,

not

use

PS

P)

24©

201

4 E

lect

ric P

ower

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, I

nc. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

)

Page 25: ng ki NRC Public Meeting on Filtering Strategies Rulemaking · Review from December 12, 2013 Public Meeting •General assumptions – ELAP assuming FLEX per EA-12-049, EA-13-109,

Toge

ther

…Sh

apin

g th

e Fu

ture

of E

lect

ricity