next generation networking - ngn checo september, 2003 pat burns, csu

28
Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Upload: anissa-simon

Post on 29-Dec-2015

229 views

Category:

Documents


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Next Generation Networking - NGN

CHECOSeptember, 2003Pat Burns, CSU

Page 2: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 2

What is NGN? Optical data networking “Dark” fiber + optical transport

New technology WDM (wave division multiplexing) – multiple “channels” across a single fiber

Much more efficient use of telecom infrastructure, resulted in a “glut” of fiber in the ground

New technology lowers cost and provides dramatically increased performance

NGN ~ $1/Mbps-mo vs. traditional ~ $100/Mbps-mo

Speeds of 1 tera bps – one million-million bits per second (1012 bps) are possible; 1-40 Gbps easy

Page 3: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 3

Need for NGN – Scale Expensive, constrictive bottleneck between LANs,

CSU LAN@10 Gbps - WAN@135 Mbps - FRGP LAN@10 Gbps WAN “bottleneck” throttles to 1/60th LAN capacity

100 GBE LANs emerging (1/600th capacity) To provide > modem speeds; e.g. at CSU

WAN speed = 135 Mbps, @ 20k networked devices = ~7 kbps/device (even @4X, still only modem speeds)

To accommodate broadband access from off campus

Each broadband connection can consume ~ 1 Mbps CSU can now accept only about 20-30 such connections

For homeland cybersecurity Alternate path, alternate infrastructure

Page 4: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 4

National NGN Activities National Light Rail (NLR)

Initially, CA–WA–Den–Chicago–Pittsburgh Other segments, rings “on the drawing board” Internet2 participation in NLR

Initially, will augment I2 Eventually, will be next generation Internet (I3?)

Puts US on par w/ Canada, Japan, EU countries who are deploying national optical nets

NSF sponsored “Optical Networking Cookbook” See

http://wnt.utexas.edu/~danu/ren-2003-02.html

Page 5: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 5

NGN Activities in Other States California – CENIC Canada – CANARIE Indiana – I-Wire Illinois – I-Wave Mass. – Harvard joint

trench project Michigan – Merit New York - NYSERNet No. Carolina -

NCREN3

Ohio – OARNet Provo, UT & others –

FTTH Southern Crossroads

(SoX) SURA (13 states in the

southeast) Virginia tech E-Corridor

Funded by these other states, despite the economy!

Page 6: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 6

Local Fiber Deployments Boulder – BRAN PRPA – Ft. Collins – Longmont CCoD and others Arkansas Valley (SECOM) Glenwood Springs, to Grand Junction? Durango? CDOT activities

Current project: Denver to Colorado Springs

Page 7: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 7

NGN Deployments in Colorado

Arkansas Valley Glenwood Springs? NCAR-L3-FRGP Boulder: NCAR, NOAA, UCB,… Ft. Collins: CSU, cities of Ft. Collins

and Loveland, county, K-12, hospital CSU-Longmont-NCAR

Page 8: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 8

NGN Deployments - Purpose

Transport for higher education nodes

Have offered to explore mutual back-up with MNT’s OC-3 for transport across the LATA (more later)

Page 9: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 9

CWDM Link: CSU - NCAR Two CWDM links w/ co-lo in Longmont

1. CSU – Longmont: PRPA fiber2. Longmont to NCAR: ICG and BRAN fiber

Movaz equipment at all nodes ~ 27-28 dB (~ 50 fiber miles) optical budget

for CWDM Carrier class, simple, inexpensive 2.5 Gbps waves: up to 8 @CWDM, 40 @DWDM CWDM and DWDM possible in the same cabinet Very small company – risk!

Page 10: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 10

CWDM with 2 Waves (2 ’s) over a single pair of fibers

FRGP

L3 PoP

Movaz -Each = 2.5 Gbps,2 GBE

Qwest OC-3

Cisco - GBE

CSU CWDM

LGMT CWDM

NCAR CWDM To Bldr.County

Page 11: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 11

NGN Pricing Model for CSU Fiber: CSU-Boulder - $36/mile-mo-pair NGN Coarse (C)WDM equip. @ 1 GBE - $64k Amortization of NGN costs (est.)

Fiber @ 70 miles $2,520/month Equipment $1,000/month (5 yrs.) Total $3,520/month Per unit capacity

@ 1 GBE $3.52/Mbps-month @ 10 GBE ~$0.40/Mbps-month

Current costs for Qwest OC-3 circuit $11,600 per month for 135 Mbps

$86/Mbps-monthCompare!

Page 12: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 12

CDOT Fiber Project The CDOT Project

Conduit - south along I-25 from Lincoln in Denver (TREX) to south Colorado Springs

168 ct. fiber from CDOT headquarters in Denver south along I-25 to Colorado Springs, with 3 “spurs” to Douglas County

Regeneration node w/ generator back-up at Monument Hill The deal:

Funded mostly by CDOT (132 ct.) & Douglas County (24 ct.) Higher ed (12 ct.)

Contributes $50k, splicing labor, and some expertise

Next CDOT project is Colorado Springs to Pueblo

Page 13: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 13

Fiber splicing Vans

UCB “ice cream” truck CSU ambulance

Splicing probably in November

Page 14: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU
Page 15: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU
Page 16: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 16

CDOT Fiber Project: In Process

Link to FRGP in Denver Terminus in Colorado Springs Network design

Network topology Passive amplification Equipment specification Operational model Implementation

Page 17: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 17

Denver Terminus – Topology

Lincoln

I-25

I-70

I-225

York

FRGP

Downing

ParkerRoad

CCoDSegments

AdditionalCDOT

Segments

Page 18: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 18

Denver Terminus There will be costs associated with the

Denver Terminus – looking for 2 fibers, to start with CDOT wants a “swap”

Maybe pulling in shared fiber, along I-225? Maybe offer them a color of light from CS-Denver? Cost may be significant

CCoD wants the costs of builds covered Costs will probably be minimal

A second path, maybe via I-25, is on our agenda

Frank Edlin, comments?

Page 19: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 19

I-25 Fiber Laterals – Not to Scale

Fiber is east of I-25

M/M 193,Lincoln Ave.

M/M 183.5,Justice Ctr.

M/M 181.3,

M/M 180.8,Plum Creek

Pkwy

M/M 135,Bijou

M/M 128

DouglasCountyLaterals

168 ct. fiber - 132 CDOT - 24 Douglas Cty. - 12 Higher ed

~ 300 ft. east to DC building?

~ 30 ft. east to DC fiber vault

~ 300 ft west under I-25 to DC Justice Center

M/M 161.3,Monument Hill

Regen node, co-location

CS Traffic Operations Center, CDOT drop-off

Page 20: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 20

Colorado Springs Topology Nodes

Hub - UCCS PPCC north and south campuses

Segments Use city conduit/fiber from I-25 Laterals from city conduit to nodes

Connection to Pueblo, Arkansas Valley?

Jerry Wilson, Ken Goodwin, Dan Tacker – comments?

Page 21: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 21

To Do Fiber topology Network architecture Equipment selection Routing model Operational model Business model – sharing the costs Governance Refinement over time…

Page 22: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 22

Equipment Recommendation Recommend considering carrier

class equipment as the link will be very important to multiple entities Reliability – 5 9’s (99.999%) ? Monitoring and alarms CWDM

Routing flexibility Separation of traffic Relatively inexpensive scalability

Page 23: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 23

Movaz NGN Equipment at CSU

Page 24: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 24

Overview of State Networking – the Front Range GigaPoP (FRGP)

FRGP

1,000 Mbps

Internet2

Level3622 Mbps

155 Mbps

AT&TC&W

“Internet1”

MNT- some K-12, libraries

Higher ed (CO, WY)FederalLabs- state agencies

- cities- counties- K-12

“Internet1”

Page 25: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 25

FRGP Fiber Ring in Denver

FRGP Primary1200 Larimer

FRGP Secondary1250 14th Street

“Telco Hotel”910 15th Street

L3 PoP850 Pearl

AT&T OC-3,I2 OC-12

L3GBE

Page 26: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 26

FRGP Ring in Denver L3 proposal - ~$94k for a 20-year

IRU for 2 strands Can pre-pay 20 years maintenance @

~$100k additional Adesta: $36k per mile for a 20-year

IRU Annual maintenance minimal Need fiber laterals to FRGP #1 and #2 Need to pull in and splice fiber

Page 27: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 27

Northern Colorado/Wyoming Ring UW is ordering a fiber path from L3, as

follows: 2 strands Laramie (UW) through Cheyenne to the L3

PoP in Denver 2 regeneration co-location points along the

route Considering “closing the ring” with a

segment between UW and CSU

Page 28: Next Generation Networking - NGN CHECO September, 2003 Pat Burns, CSU

Septyember 2003 CHECO - NGN Briefing 28

Solicit Feedback

Your feedback and comments are welcome